Oral Azithromycin Use and the Recovery of Lung Function from Pulmonary Exacerbations Treated with Intravenous Tobramycin or Colistimethate in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

Drugs, Drugs, Drugs: Current Treatment Paradigms in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Infections

Airway infections have remained a prominent feature in persons living with cystic fibrosis (CF) despite the dramatic improvements in survival in the past decades. Antimicrobials are a cornerstone of infection management for both acute and chronic maintenance indications. Historic clinical trials of antimicrobials in CF have led to the adoption of consensus guidelines for their use in clinical care. More recently, however, there are efforts to re-think the optimal use of antimicrobials for care with the advent of novel and highly effective CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapies. Encouragingly, however, drug development has remained active concurrently in this space. Our review focuses on the evidence for and perspectives regarding antimicrobial use in both acute and maintenance settings in persons with CF. The therapeutic innovations in CF and how this may affect antimicrobial approaches are also discussed.

Hypoxia-sensitive adjuvant loaded liposomes enhance the antimicrobial activity of azithromycin via phospholipase-triggered releasing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms eradication

Robust biofilms and the complex airway environment with thick sputum, local hypoxia and persistent inflammation induce the intractability of chronic pulmonary infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). Herein, we proposed a type of antibiotic-adjuvant liposomes (NANO@PS-LPs), co-incorporating azithromycin (AZI), adjuvant (2-nitroimidazole derivative, 6-NIH) and biofilm dispersant (nitric oxide donor, DETA NONOate). NANO@PS-LPs possessing negatively-charged surface and good hydrophilicity could easily penetrate through the sputum layer, then disassembled triggered by overexpressed phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂) in the microenvironment around biofilms. Nitric oxide produced by DETA NONOate promoted P. aeruginosa biofilms dispersal. 6-NIH was reduced to 2-aminomidazole derivative (6-AIH) under a hypoxic condition, and hence acted as an AZI adjuvant to enhance the antibacterial activity of AZI. It was found that NANO@PS-LPs could significantly eliminate mature P. aeruginosa biofilms, effectively kill dispersed bacteria, inhibit the metabolism of survivors and prevent P. aeruginosa adherence to airway epithelial cells, accordingly restrain recurrent infections. Additionally, NANO@PS-LPs performed a remarkable advantage in killing AZI-resistant P. aeruginosa and removing their biofilms. In summary, NANO@PS-LPs present a potential nano-strategy to treat stubborn pseudomonal pulmonary infections and overcome correlative drug resistance.

Testing the effects of combining azithromycin with inhaled tobramycin for P. aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a randomised, controlled clinical trial

RATIONALE

Inhaled tobramycin and oral azithromycin are common chronic therapies in people with cystic fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. Some studies have shown that azithromycin can reduce the ability of tobramycin to kill P. aeruginosa. This trial was done to test the effects of combining azithromycin with inhaled tobramycin on clinical and microbiological outcomes in people already using inhaled tobramycin. We theorised that those randomised to placebo (no azithromycin) would have greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and greater reduction in P. aeruginosa sputum in response to tobramycin.

METHODS

A 6-week prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial testing oral azithromycin versus placebo combined with clinically prescribed inhaled tobramycin in individuals with cystic fibrosis and P. aeruginosa airway infection.

RESULTS

Over a 6-week period, including 4 weeks of inhaled tobramycin, the relative change in FEV1 did not statistically significantly differ between groups (azithromycin (n=56) minus placebo (n=52) difference: 3.44%; 95% CI: -0.48 to 7.35; p=0.085). Differences in secondary clinical outcomes, including patient-reported symptom scores, weight and need for additional antibiotics, did not significantly differ. Among the 29 azithromycin and 35 placebo participants providing paired sputum samples, the 6-week change in P. aeruginosa density differed in favour of the placebo group (difference: 0.75 log10 CFU/mL; 95% CI: 0.03 to 1.47; p=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having greater reduction in P. aeruginosa density in participants able to provide sputum samples, participants randomised to placebo with inhaled tobramycin did not experience significantly greater improvements in lung function or other clinical outcomes compared with those randomised to azithromycin with tobramycin.

Emerging non-pulmonary complications for adults with cystic fibrosis

Improved treatments of cystic fibrosis (CF) related lung disease have resulted in increased longevity, but also increasing prevalence and severity of extrapulmonary manifestations of CF, treatment related complications, age-related conditions and psychosocial effects of longstanding chronic disease. Likewise, the recognition of mild CF phenotypes has changed the landscape of CF disease. This review outlines our current understanding of the common extrapulmonary complications of CF, as well as the changing landscape and future directions of the extrapulmonary complications experienced by patients with CF.

Effect of Concomitant Azithromycin and Tobramycin Use on Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation Treatment

Rationale: Pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) are associated with significant morbidity in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Severe PExs are treated with intravenous antibiotics, including tobramycin. CF care guidelines recommend continuing chronic maintenance medications during PEx treatment. Azithromycin (AZM) is one of the most widely prescribed chronic medications for CF in the United States. Recent evidence has identified a potential antagonistic relationship between AZM and tobramycin.Objectives: To determine whether, among PEx treated with intravenous tobramycin, concomitant AZM use is associated with worse clinical outcomes.Methods: Retrospective cohort study using the CF Foundation Patient Registry-Pediatric Health Information System (CFFPR-PHIS)-linked dataset. People with CF age 6-21 years were included if they were hospitalized between 2006 and 2016 for a PEx. Inverse probability of treatment weighing was used to minimize the effects of confounders, including indication bias. Associations of concomitant treatment with AZM and lung function outcomes were determined using linear mixed-effect models and generalized estimating equations. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate associations with time to next PEx.Results: Among the 10,660 people with CF included in the CFFPR-PHIS-linked dataset, 2,294 children and adolescents with 5,022 PExs that had intravenous tobramycin use were identified. A little less than half (n = 2,247; 45%) of all PExs were treated concomitantly with AZM and intravenous tobramycin. AZM use both at the most recent outpatient clinic encounter and during PEx treatment in combination with intravenous tobramycin was associated with a significantly lower absolute improvement in percentage-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV₁) (-0.93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.78 to -0.07; P = 0.033), a lesser odds of returning to 90% or more of baseline ppFEV₁ (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93; P = 0.003), and a shorter time to next PEx requiring intravenous antibiotics (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31; P < 0.001) compared with intravenous tobramycin use without concomitant AZM.Conclusions: Concomitant AZM and intravenous tobramycin use for in-hospital PEx treatment was associated with poorer clinical outcomes than treatment with intravenous tobramycin without AZM. These results support the hypothesis that an antagonistic relationship between these two medications might exist.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Current Evidences, Gaps in Knowledge and Future Directions

Antibiotic therapy is one of the main treatments for cystic fibrosis (CF). It aims to eradicate bacteria during early infection, calms down the inflammatory process, and leads to symptom resolution of pulmonary exacerbations. CF can modify both the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of antibiotics, therefore specific PK/PD endpoints should be determined in the context of CF. Currently available data suggest that optimal PK/PD targets cannot be attained in sputum with intravenous aminoglycosides. Continuous infusion appears preferable for β-lactam antibiotics, but optimal concentrations in sputum are unlikely to be reached, with some possible exceptions such as meropenem and ceftolozane. Usual doses are likely suboptimal for fluoroquinolones and linezolid, whereas daily doses of 45-60 mg/kg and 200 mg could be convenient for vancomycin and doxycycline, respectively. Weekly azithromycin doses of 22-30 mg/kg could also be appropriate for its anti-inflammatory effect. The difficulty with achieving optimal concentrations supports the use of combined treatments and the inhaled administration route, as very high local concentrations, concomitantly with low systemic exposure, can be obtained with the inhaled route for aminoglycosides, colistin, and fluoroquinolones, thus minimizing the risk of toxicity.

Pulmonary Outcomes Associated with Long-Term Azithromycin Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis

Rationale: Chronic azithromycin is commonly used in cystic fibrosis based on short controlled clinical trials showing reductions in pulmonary exacerbations and improved FEV₁. Long-term effects are unknown.

Objectives: Examine pulmonary outcomes among chronic azithromycin users compared with matched controls over years of use and consider combined azithromycin use in cohorts using chronic inhaled tobramycin or aztreonam.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. cystic fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Incident chronic azithromycin users were compared with matched controls by FEV₁% predicted rate of decline and rates of intravenous antibiotic use to treat pulmonary exacerbations. Propensity score methods were utilized to address confounding by indication. Predefined sensitivity analyses based on lung function, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) status, and follow-up time intervals were conducted.

Measurements and Main Results: Across 3 years, FEV₁% predicted per-year decline was nearly 40% less in those with PA using azithromycin compared with matched controls (slopes, −1.53 versus −2.41% predicted per yr; difference: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30–1.47). This rate of decline did not differ based on azithromycin use in those without PA. Among all cohorts, use of intravenous antibiotics was no different between azithromycin users and controls. Users of inhaled tobramycin and azithromycin had FEV₁% predicted per-year decline of −0.16 versus nonusers (95% CI, −0.44 to 0.13), whereas users of inhaled aztreonam lysine and azithromycin experienced a mean 0.49% predicted per year slower decline than matched controls (95% CI, −0.11 to 1.10).

Conclusions: Results from this study provide additional rationale for chronic azithromycin use in PA-positive patients to reduce lung function decline.

Azithromycin is the answer in paediatric respiratory medicine, but what was the question?

The first clinical indication of non-antibiotic benefits of macrolides was in the Far East, in adults with diffuse panbronchiolitis. This condition is characterised by chronic airway infection, often with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, airway inflammation, bronchiectasis and a high mortality. Low dose erythromycin, and subsequently other macrolides, led in many cases to complete remission of the condition, and abrogated the neutrophilic airway inflammation characteristic of the disease. This dramatic finding sparked a flurry of interest in the many hundreds of macrolides in nature, especially their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. The biggest subsequent trials of azithromycin were in cystic fibrosis, which has obvious similarities to diffuse panbronchiolitis. There were unquestionable improvements in lung function and pulmonary exacerbations, but compared to diffuse panbronchiolitis, the results were disappointing. Case reports, case series and some randomised controlled trials followed in other conditions. Three trials of azithromycin in preschool wheeze gave contradictory results; a trial in pauci-inflammatory adult asthma, and a trial in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis both showed a significant reduction in exacerbations, but none matched the dramatic results in diffuse panbronchiolitis. There is clearly a huge risk of antibacterial resistance if macrolides are used widely and uncritically in the community. In summary, Azithromycin is not the answer to anything in paediatric respiratory medicine; the paediatric respiratory community needs to refocus on the dramatic benefits of macrolides in diffuse panbronchiolitis, use modern - omics technologies to determine the endotypes of inflammatory diseases and discover in nature or synthesise designer macrolides to replicate the diffuse panbronchiolitis results. We must now find out how to do better!

Prevention of drug-related complications in cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to continuous development of new drugs and better treatment strategies, survival of patients with cystic fibrosis has changed dramatically. Recently, targeted therapy of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have become available. Despite these promising developments, treatment of this complex multiorgan disease constitutes a high and variable amount of other drugs. Complications of pharmacotherapeutic treatment are, therefore, expected to become more prevalent. This gives cause to review drug-related side effects in this new era in cystic fibrosis treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

We will discuss cystic fibrosis-related pharmacotherapies with a focus on indication of treatment, side effects and their complications, drug--drug interactions, and options to monitor and prevent drug-induced toxicity. Many recent publications about pharmacotherapy in cystic fibrosis, focus on antifungal therapy and CFTR modulators. We will give an overview of the most important studies.

SUMMARY

With increased life expectancy which is, in part, because of better treatment options, the burden of pharmacotherapy in cystic fibrosis patients will increase. This has a high impact on quality of life as pharmacotherapy is time consuming and may cause side effects. Therefore, it is very important to be aware of possible pharmacotherapy-related side effects and their complications, drug--drug interactions, and options to monitor and prevent drug-induced toxicity.