Pulmonary Pathology Society Perspective on the 2018 American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Practice Guidelines

Pulmonary Pathology Society Survey on Practice Approaches in the Histologic Diagnosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: Consensus and Opportunities

CONTEXT.—

The pathologic diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) remains a challenging area, and application of histologic UIP guidelines has proved difficult.

OBJECTIVE.—

To understand current practice approaches by pulmonary pathologists for the histologic diagnosis of UIP and other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).

DESIGN.—

The Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) ILD Working Group developed and sent a 5-part survey on fibrotic ILD electronically to the PPS membership.

RESULTS.—

One hundred sixty-one completed surveys were analyzed. Of the respondents, 89% reported using published histologic features in clinical guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in their pathologic diagnosis; however, there was variability in reporting terminology, quantity and quality of histologic features, and the use of guideline categorization. Respondents were very likely to have access to pulmonary pathology colleagues (79%), pulmonologists (98%), and radiologists (94%) to discuss cases. Half of respondents reported they may alter their pathologic diagnosis based on additional clinical and radiologic history if it is pertinent. Airway-centered fibrosis, granulomas, and types of inflammatory infiltrates were considered important, but there was poor agreement on how these features are defined.

CONCLUSIONS.—

There is significant consensus among the PPS membership on the importance of histologic guidelines/features of UIP. There are unmet needs for (1) consensus and standardization of diagnostic terminology and incorporation of recommended histopathologic categories from the clinical IPF guidelines into pathology reports, (2) agreement on how to incorporate into the report relevant clinical and radiographic information, and (3) defining the quantity and quality of features needed to suggest alternative diagnoses.

The Unveiled Triad: Clinical, Radiological and Pathological Insights into Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DLPD) characterized by complex interstitial lung damage with polymorphic and protean inflammatory aspects affecting lung tissue targets including small airways, the interstitium, alveolar compartments and vascular structures. HP shares clinical and often radiological features with other lung diseases in acute or chronic forms. In its natural temporal evolution, if specific therapy is not initiated promptly, HP leads to progressive fibrotic damage with reduced lung volumes and impaired gas exchange. The prevalence of HP varies considerably worldwide, influenced by factors like imprecise disease classification, diagnostic method limitations for obtaining a confident diagnosis, diagnostic limitations in the correct processing of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) radiological parameters, unreliable medical history, diverse geographical conditions, heterogeneous agricultural and industrial practices and occasionally ineffective individual protections regarding occupational exposures and host risk factors. The aim of this review is to present an accurate and detailed 360-degree analysis of HP considering HRCT patterns and the role of the broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL), without neglecting biopsy and anatomopathological aspects and future technological developments that could make the diagnosis of this disease less challenging.

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern is a frequent finding in patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome treated with bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation: current best evidence

Patients with post-acute COVID-19 (PA-COVID) syndrome or long COVID-19 syndrome develop persistent symptoms and complications that last beyond 4 weeks of the initial infection. There is limited information regarding the pulmonary pathology in PA-COVID patients who require bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation (BOLT). Our experience with 40 lung explants from 20 PA-COVID patients who underwent BOLT is described. Clinicopathologic findings are correlated with best evidence from literature. The lung parenchyma showed bronchiectasis (n = 20) and severe interstitial fibrosis with areas resembling the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern of fibrosis (n = 20), interstitial fibrosis not otherwise specified (n = 20), and fibrotic cysts (n = 9). None of the explants exhibited a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern of fibrosis. Other parenchymal changes included multinucleated giant cells (n = 17), hemosiderosis (n = 16), peribronchiolar metaplasia (n = 19), obliterative bronchiolitis (n = 6), and microscopic honeycombing (n = 5). Vascular abnormalities included thrombosis of a lobar artery (n = 1) and microscopic thrombi in small vessels (n = 7). Systematic literature review identified 7 articles reporting the presence in 12 patients of interstitial fibrosis showing the NSIP pattern (n = 3), organizing pneumonia/diffuse alveolar damage (n = 4) and not otherwise specified (n = 3) patterns. All but one of these studies also reported the presence of multinucleated giant cells and none of the studies reported the presence of severe vascular abnormalities. PA-COVID patients undergoing BOLT show a pattern of fibrosis that resembles a mixed cellular-fibrotic NSIP pattern and generally lack severe vascular complications. As the NSIP pattern of fibrosis is often associated with autoimmune diseases, additional studies are needed to understand the mechanism of disease and learn whether this information can be used for therapeutic purposes.

Pathologic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia vs Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Transbronchial Cryobiopsies

Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of fibrosing interstitial pneumonias, but there are few detailed descriptions of the pathologic findings in such cases. It has been proposed that a combination of patchy fibrosis and fibroblast foci with an absence of alternative features is diagnostic of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP; ie, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF]) in TBCB. In this study, we reviewed 121 TBCB in which a diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP; n = 83) or IPF (n = 38) was made by multidisciplinary discussion and evaluated a range of pathologic features. Patchy fibrosis was found in 65 of 83 (78%) biopsies from FHP and 32of 38 (84%) biopsies from UIP/IPF cases. Fibroblast foci were present in 47 of 83 (57%) FHP and 27 of 38 (71%) UIP/IPF cases. Fibroblast foci/patchy fibrosis combined did not favor either diagnosis. Architectural distortion was seen in 54 of 83 (65%) FHP and 32 of 38 (84%) UIP/IPF cases (odds ratio [OR] for FHP, 0.35; P = .036) and honeycombing in 18 of 83 (22%) and 17 of 38 (45%), respectively (OR, 0.37; P = .014). Airspace giant cells/granulomas were present in 13 of 83 (20%) FHP and 1 of 38 (2.6%) UIP/IPF cases (OR for FHP, 6.87; P = .068), and interstitial giant cells/granulomas in 20 of 83 (24%) FHP and 0 of 38 (0%) UIP/IPF (OR, 6.7 x 106; P = .000). We conclude that patchy fibrosis plus fibroblast foci can be found in TBCB from both FHP and UIP/IPF. The complete absence of architectural distortion/honeycombing favors a diagnosis of FHP, as does the presence of airspace or interstitial giant cells/granulomas, but these measures are insensitive, and many cases of FHP cannot be separated from UIP/IPF on TBCB.

A novel gene signature based on the hub genes of COVID-19 predicts the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background: Increasing evidence has demonstrated that there was a strong correlation between COVID-19 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the studies are limited, and the real biological mechanisms behind the IPF progression were still uncleared.

Methods: GSE70866 and GSE 157103 datasets were downloaded. The weight gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) algorithms were conducted to identify the most correlated gene module with COVID-19. Then the genes were extracted to construct a risk signature in IPF patients by performing Univariate and Lasso Cox Regression analysis. Univariate and Multivariate Cox Regression analyses were used to identify the independent value for predicting the prognosis of IPF patients. What’s more, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Gene Ontology (GO), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were conducted to unveil the potential biological pathways. CIBERSORT algorithms were performed to calculate the correlation between the risk score and immune cells infiltrating levels.

Results: Two hundred thirty three differentially expressed genes were calculated as the hub genes in COVID-19. Fourteen of these genes were identified as the prognostic differentially expressed genes in IPF. Three (MET, UCHL1, and IGF1) of the fourteen genes were chosen to construct the risk signature. The risk signature can greatly predict the prognosis of high-risk and low-risk groups based on the calculated risk score. The functional pathway enrichment analysis and immune infiltrating analysis showed that the risk signature may regulate the immune-related pathways and immune cells.

Conclusion: We identified prognostic differentially expressed hub genes related to COVID-19 in IPF. A risk signature was constructed based on those genes and showed great value for predicting the prognosis in IPF patients. What’s more, three genes in the risk signature may be clinically valuable as potential targets for treating IPF patients and IPF patients with COVID-19.

Influence of chest wall conformation on spirometry parameters and outcome in mild-to-moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Extrinsic causes of restrictive lung syndrome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients have been poorly investigated. We aimed to investigate the influence of the anterior chest wall deformity, noninvasively assessed by modified Haller index (MHI), on spirometry parameters and outcome in a consecutive population of patients with mild-to-moderate IPF. Sixty consecutive IPF patients (73.8 ± 6.6 years, 45 males) were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent physical examination, spirometry, blood tests, conventional transthoracic echocardiography and MHI assessment (chest transverse diameter over the distance between sternum and spine) at basal evaluation. During follow-up, we evaluated the composite endpoint of (1) pulmonary or cardiovascular hospitalizations and (2) all-cause mortality. IPF patients with concave-shaped chest wall (MHI > 2.5) (36.7% of total) and those with normal chest shape (MHI ≤ 2.5) (63.3%) were separately analyzed. In comparison to IPF patients with MHI ≤ 2.5, those with MHI > 2.5: were less likely to be men and smokers; had a more severe restrictive pattern; had significantly smaller cardiac chamber dimensions and significantly higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (51.9 ± 15.1 vs 42.4 ± 14.3 mmHg, p = 0.02). Mean follow-up time was 2.5 ± 1.4 years. During follow-up, 13 deaths and 16 pulmonary or cardiovascular hospitalizations were detected. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, concave-shaped chest wall (MHI > 2.5) (HR 4.55, 95% CI 1.02-20.4), increased C-reactive protein (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08-2.61) and absence of beta-blocker therapy (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01-0.26) were independently associated to the investigated outcome. MHI assessment and implementation may help the clinician to identify, among IPF patients, those with poorer prognosis over a medium-term follow-up.

Usual interstitial pneumonia: a clinically significant pattern, but not the final word

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a concept that is deeply entrenched in clinical practice and the prognostic significance of UIP is well established, but the field continues to suffer from the lack of a true gold standard for diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). The meaning and usage of UIP have shifted over time and this term is prone to misinterpretation and poor diagnostic agreement. For pathologists, it is worth reflecting on the limitations of UIP and our true role in the care of patients with ILD, a controversial topic explored in two point-counterpoint editorials published simultaneously in this journal. Current diagnostic guidelines are ambiguous and difficult to apply in clinical practice. Further complicating matters for the pathologist is the paradigm shift that occurred with the advent of anti-fibrotic agents, necessitating increased focus on the most likely etiology of fibrosis rather than simply the pattern of fibrosis when pulmonologists select appropriate therapy. Despite the wealth of information locked in tissue samples that could provide novel insights into fibrotic ILDs, pulmonologists increasingly shy away from obtaining biopsies, likely because pathologists no longer provide sufficient value to offset the risks of a biopsy procedure, and pathologic assessment is insufficiently reliable to meaningfully inform therapeutic decisionmaking. To increase the value of biopsies, pathologists must first recognize the problems with UIP as a diagnostic term. Second, pathologists must realize that the primary goal of a biopsy is to determine the most likely etiology to target with therapy, requiring a shift in diagnostic focus. Third, pathologists must devise and validate new classifications and criteria that are evidence-based, biologically relevant, easy to use, and predictive of outcome and treatment response. Only after the limitations of UIP are understood will pathologists provide maximum diagnostic value from biopsies to clinicians today and advance the field forward.

The histologic diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Where we are and where we need to go

In the 50 years since its inception by Dr. Liebow, the diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) by pathologists has changed significantly. This manuscript reviews the progressive history of the histologic diagnosis of UIP and summarizes the current state of histologic UIP and its relationship to the clinical syndrome idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Fibrotic lung disease mimics of UIP/IPF are reviewed and pearls for distinguishing these diseases from UIP/IPF are provided. Strategies for increasing the value of histologic assessment of biopsies in the setting of pulmonary fibrosis are also discussed.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: new concepts and classifications

The clinical and pathologic diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis has been confounded by conflicting definitions, with two recent guidelines suggesting that hypersensitivity pneumonitis simply be diagnosed as nonfibrotic or fibrotic. Nonfibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is usually characterized by a bronchiolocentric chronic interstitial inflammatory infiltrate, frequently but by no means always with associated granulomas or giant cells. Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis may take the form of interstitial fibrosis confined to the peribronchiolar regions, or fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or a process similar to and sometimes indistinguishable from usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic interstitial fibrosis, but the exact pathologic features that favor a diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis are disputed. Granulomas/giant cells are much less frequent in fibrotic compared to nonfibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Extensive peribronchiolar metaplasia, particularly peribronchiolar metaplasia affecting more than half the bronchioles, supports a diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis over usual interstitial pneumonia, as does the presence of predominantly peribronchiolar disease with relative subpleural sparing. Clinical and CT features are crucial to the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: sparing of the lung bases, centrilobular nodules, air-trapping, or the triple density sign with fibrosis favor a diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. At this point there are no molecular tests that reliably separate fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from other forms of interstitial lung disease. Currently the separation of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from usual interstitial pneumonia is crucial to treatment (immunosuppressives for the former, anti-fibrotics for the latter) but this approach is changing and all progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonias will probably be treated with antifibrotics in the future.

Lung fibrosis in autoimmune diseases and hypersensitivity: how to separate these from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Lung involvement in autoimmune diseases (AID) is uncommon, but may precede other organ manifestations. A diagnostic problem is chronicity presenting with lung fibrosis. A new category of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features for patients with clinical symptoms of AID and presenting with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) enables antifibrotic treatment for these patients. Hypersensitivity pneumonia (HP) and other forms of lung fibrosis were not included into this category. As these diseases based on adverse immune reactions often present with unspecific clinical symptoms, a specified pathological diagnosis will assist the clinical evaluation. We aimed to establish etiology-relevant differences of patterns associated with AID or HP combined with lung fibrosis. We retrospectively evaluated 51 cases of AID, and 29 cases of HP with lung fibrosis, and compared these to 24 cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (UIP/IPF). Subacute AID and HP most often presented with organizing pneumonia (OP), whereas chronicity was associated with UIP. Unspecified fibrosis was seen in a few cases, whereas NSIP pattern was rare. In 9 cases, the underlying etiology could not be defined. Statistically significant features differentiating chronic AID or HP from UIP/IPF are lymphocytic infiltrations into myofibroblastic/fibroblastic foci. Other features significantly associated with AID and HP were granulomas, isolated Langhans giant cells, and protein deposits, but seen in only a minority of cases. A combination of UIP with one of these features enabled a specific etiology-based diagnosis. Besides the antifibrotic drug regimen, additional therapies might be considered.

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia in Contemporary Surgical Pathology Practice: Impact of International Consensus Guidelines for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Pathologists

CONTEXT.—

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) radiologically and pathologically. Per consensus criteria adopted in 2011, diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis no longer requires a biopsy in an appropriate context if UIP is seen on imaging. As a result, lung biopsies are now typically reserved for patients having indeterminate clinical or imaging findings or suspicion for alternative diagnoses, but the impact of updated guidelines on pathology practice remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine the frequency of histologic UIP before and after 2011.

DESIGN.—

Surgical lung biopsies from adults were studied within two 4-year periods: July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2010 and January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2015. Pathology slides were reviewed in a fashion blinded to clinical information and were classified using current guidelines.

RESULTS.—

Biopsies from 177 and 86 patients (mean [SD] age, 62 [12] and 59 [14] years; 50.3% [89 of 177] and 48.8% [42 of 86] men) before and after 2011, respectively, were reviewed. Probable UIP or UIP was less-frequently encountered after 2011 in all patients with fibrosis (9 of 54 [16.7%] versus 41 of 119 [34.5%] before 2011, P = .02) and also in patients 50 years old and older (8 of 46 [17.4%] versus 39 of 109 [35.8%] before 2011, P = .02), with a concomitant rise in cases indeterminate for UIP or showing alternative diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Histology for UIP is less frequently encountered in our contemporary practice compared with the historic era. The pretest probability of a non-UIP diagnosis is now high, even in elderly patients, underscoring the need for pathologists to be familiar with the histologic features of alternative diagnoses.

Histopathologic Assessment of Suspected Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go

CONTEXT.—

Accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) requires multidisciplinary diagnosis that includes clinical, radiologic, and often pathologic assessment. In 2018, the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Latin American Thoracic Society (ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT) and the Fleischner Society each published guidelines for the diagnosis of IPF, which include criteria for 4 categories of confidence of a histologic usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern.

OBJECTIVE.—

To (1) identify the role of the guidelines in pathologic assessment of UIP; (2) analyze the 4 guideline categories, including potential areas of difficulty; and (3) determine steps the Pulmonary Pathology Society and the greater pulmonary pathology community can take to improve current guideline criteria and histopathologic diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were derived from the guidelines, published literature, and clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Both guidelines provide pathologists with a tool to relay to the clinician the likelihood that a biopsy represents UIP, and serve as an adjunct, not a replacement, for traditional histologic diagnosis. There are multiple challenges with implementing the guidelines, including (1) lack of clarity on the quantity and quality of histologic findings required, (2) lack of recognition that histologic features cannot be assessed independently, and (3) lack of guidance on how pathologists should incorporate clinical and radiographic information. Current criteria for "probable UIP" and "indeterminate for UIP" hinder accurate reflection of the likelihood of IPF. These challenges highlight the need for further morphologic-based investigations in the field of pulmonary pathology.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: What nurses need to know

ABSTRACT

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a restrictive lung disease in which the cause cannot be determined. This article discusses restrictive lung diseases that fall under the general category of interstitial lung disease with a focus on IPF-a fatal disease characterized by progressive fibrosis and interstitial pneumonia, dyspnea, and decreasing pulmonary function.

Galectin-9 regulates follicular helper T cells to inhibit humoral autoimmunity-induced pulmonary fibrosis

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is an unexplained disease state characterized by autoimmunity and pulmonary fibrosis. Exploring the pathogenesis of IPAF is helpful for the treatment of interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In this study, we observed that the lung Galectin-9 (Gal-9) of IPAF patients was significantly reduced, which was significantly related to lung dysfunction and abnormal humoral immunity. Moreover, an overreactive germinal center (GC) reaction in the lung lymph nodes (LNs) of Gal-9-deficient mice was found to be related to abnormally active follicular helper T cells (Tfh) cells. The lack of Gal-9 ligand in Tfh cells can lead to excessive transcriptional programming and differentiation and help GC B cells. Gal-9 deficiency caused an abnormal humoral immune response in mice, leading to excessive deposition of nonspecific autoantibodies in mice and chronic lung fibrosis. Our research reveals the important regulatory role of gal-9 in Tfh cells and a possible target for the treatment of IPAF.