De novo DNA methylation at nonrandom founder sites 5' from an unmethylated minimal origin of DNA replication in latent Epstein-Barr virus genomes

Binding of CCCTC-binding factor in vivo to the region located between Rep* and the C promoter of Epstein–Barr virus is unaffected by CpG methylation and does not correlate with Cp activity

In this study, the binding of the insulator protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) to the region located between Rep* and the C promoter (Cp) of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) was analysed using chromatin immunoprecipitation and in vivo footprinting. CTCF binding was found to be independent of Cp usage in cell lines corresponding to the major EBV latency types. Bisulfite sequencing and an electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (using methylated and unmethylated probes) revealed that CTCF binding was insufficient to induce local CpG demethylation in certain cell lines and was unaffected by CpG methylation in the region between Rep* and Cp. In addition, CTCF binding to the latency promoter, Qp, did not correlate with Qp activity.

Epigenotypes of latent herpesvirus genomes

Epigenotypes are modified cellular or viral genotypes which differ in transcriptional activity in spite of having an identical (or nearly identical) DNA sequence. Restricted expression of latent, episomal herpesvirus genomes is also due to epigenetic modifications. There is no virus production (lytic viral replication, associated with the expression of all viral genes) in tight latency. In vitro experiments demonstrated that DNA methylation could influence the activity of latent (and/or crucial lytic) promoters of prototype strains belonging to the three herpesvirus subfamilies (alpha-, beta-, and gamma-herpesviruses). In vivo, however, DNA methylation is not a major regulator of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1, a human alpha-herpesvirus) latent gene expression in neurons of infected mice. In these cells, the promoter/enhancer region of latency-associated transcripts (LATs) is enriched with acetyl histone H3, suggesting that histone modifications may control HSV-1 latency in terminally differentiated, quiescent neurons. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV, a human gamma-herpesvirus) is associated with a series of neoplasms. Latent, episomal EBV genomes are subject to host cell-dependent epigenetic modifications (DNA methylation, binding of proteins and protein complexes, histone modifications). The distinct viral epigenotypes are associated with distinct EBV latency types, i.e., cell type-specific usage of latent EBV promoters controlling the expression of latent, growth transformation-associated EBV genes. The contribution of major epigenetic mechanisms to the regulation of latent EBV promoters is variable. DNA methylation contributes to silencing of Wp and Cp (alternative promoters for transcripts coding for the nuclear antigens EBNA 1-6) and LMP1p, LMP2Ap, and LMP2Bp (promoters for transcripts encoding transmembrane proteins). DNA methylation does not control, however, Qp (a promoter for EBNA1 transcripts only) in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), although in vitro methylated Qp-reporter gene constructs are silenced. The invariably unmethylated Qp is probably switched off by binding of a repressor protein in LCLs.

Epigenetic regulation of lymphoid specific gene sets

Coregulation of lymphoid-specific gene sets is achieved by a series of epigenetic mechanisms. Association with higher-order chromosomal structures (nuclear subcompartments repressing or favouring gene expression) and locus control regions affects recombination and transcription of clonotypic antigen receptors and expression of a series of other lymphoid-specific genes. Locus control regions can regulate DNA methylation patterns in their vicinity. They may induce tissue- and site-specific DNA demethylation and affect, thereby, accessibility to recombination-activating proteins, transcription factors, and enzymes involved in histone modifications. Both DNA methylation and the Polycomb group of proteins (PcG) function as alternative systems of epigenetic memory in lymphoid cells. Complexes of PcG proteins mark their target genes by covalent histone tail modifications and influence lymphoid development and rearrangement of IgH genes. Ectopic expression of protein noncoding microRNAs may affect the generation of B-lineage cells, too, by guiding effector complexes to sites of heterochromatin assembly. Coregulation of lymphoid and viral promoters is also possible. EBNA 2, a nuclear protein encoded by episomal Epstein-Barr virus genomes, binds to the cellular protein CBF1 (C promoter binding factor 1) and operates, thereby, a regulatory network to activate latent viral promoters and cellular promoters associated with CBF1 binding sites.Key words : lymphoid cells, coregulation of gene batteries, epigenetic regulation, nuclear subcompartment switch, locus control region, DNA methylation, Polycomb group of proteins, histone modifications, microRNA, Epstein-Barr virus, EBNA 2, regulatory network.

The LCR of EBV makes Burkitt's lymphoma endemic

The spectacular ability of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) to immortalize and morphologically transform human B cells in vitro to lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) is central to most molecular models of viral oncogenesis. However, binding of transcription factor and oncoprotein c-Myc to the major locus control region (LCR) of the viral genome directs us to an alternative model for the origin of Burkitt's lymphoma (BL). In this model, improved nuclear maintenance of the viral genome and the continuous expression of anti-apoptotic functions in B cells exhibiting class I EBV latency contribute to the generation of BL, without any detour through EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA) 2-driven B-cell immortalization (also called class III latency).

Protein and sequence requirements for the recruitment of the human origin recognition complex to the latent cycle origin of DNA replication of Epstein-Barr virus oriP

Initiation of DNA replication from within the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent cycle origin oriP occurs once per cell cycle and is almost entirely dependent upon cellular proteins. The human origin recognition complex (ORC) is recruited to oriP and orchestrates the events that lead to the initiation of replication. EBNA-1, the sole viral protein required for oriP-plasmid replication, binds four sites within the replicator but the role(s) it plays in the replication of oriP plasmids has not been elucidated. We investigated the recruitment of ORC to oriP in vivo and show that the binding of EBNA-1 to the replicator is necessary for the association of the ORC subunit Orc2 with the replicator. The minimal replicator of oriP consists of two EBNA-1 binding sites flanked by perfect 14-bp inverted repeats (a and b), but these repeats are dispensable for the association of Orc2 with the replicator. A mutational analysis of the 14-bp repeats provided additional support for a role for the telomere repeat binding protein 2 in oriP replicator function. We show that nucleotide differences between the oriP replicator of the B95-8 and Raji EBV genomes are not solely responsible for the inefficient utilization of this origin in the Raji EBV genome.

Plasticity of DNA replication initiation in Epstein-Barr virus episomes

In mammalian cells, the activity of the sites of initiation of DNA replication appears to be influenced epigenetically, but this regulation is not fully understood. Most studies of DNA replication have focused on the activity of individual initiation sites, making it difficult to evaluate the impact of changes in initiation activity on the replication of entire genomic loci. Here, we used single molecule analysis of replicated DNA (SMARD) to study the latent duplication of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) episomes in human cell lines. We found that initiation sites are present throughout the EBV genome and that their utilization is not conserved in different EBV strains. In addition, SMARD shows that modifications in the utilization of multiple initiation sites occur across large genomic regions (tens of kilobases in size). These observations indicate that individual initiation sites play a limited role in determining the replication dynamics of the EBV genome. Long-range mechanisms and the genomic context appear to play much more important roles, affecting the frequency of utilization and the order of activation of multiple initiation sites. Finally, these results confirm that initiation sites are extremely redundant elements of the EBV genome. We propose that these conclusions also apply to mammalian chromosomes.

Despite overall similarities between genomes, initiation of DNA replication and speed of duplication in different parts of the genome differs amongst EBV strains

Host cell-dependent expression of latent Epstein-Barr virus genomes: regulation by DNA methylation

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous human gammaherpesvirus associated with a wide spectrum of malignant neoplasms. Expression of latent (growth transformation-associated) EBV genes is host cell specific. Transcripts for EBV-encoded nuclear antigens (EBNAs) are initiated at one of the alternative promoters: Wp, Cp (for EBNA1-6), or Qp (for EBNA1 only). Wp is active shortly after EBV infection of human B cells in vitro but is progressively methylated and silenced in established lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). In parallel Cp, an unmethylated, lymphoid-specific promoter is switched on. In contrast, Cp is methylated and silent in Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) cell lines, which keep the phenotype of BL biopsy cells (group I BL lines). These cells use Qp for the initiation of EBNA1 messages. Qp is unmethylated both in group I BLs (Qp on) and in LCLs (Qp off). Thus, DNA methylation does not play a role in silencing Qp. In LCLs and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells, transcripts for latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) are initiated from LMP1p, a promoter regulated by CpG methylation. LMPlp is silent in group I BL lines but can be activated by demethylating agents. Promoter silencing by CpG methylation involves both direct interference with transcription factor binding (Wp, Cp) and indirect mechanisms involving the recruitment of histone deacetylases (LMPlp). A dyad symmetry sequence(DS) within oriP (the latent origin of EBV replication) and intragenic RNA polymerase III control regions of EBER 1 and 2 transcription units are invariably unmethylated in EBV-carrying cells.

Viral genes and methylation

Epigenetics represents a new frontier in cancer research. Methylation is the best studied of the epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene expression. Regulation of gene expression by means of methylation has been reported for tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, viral promoters, and age-related genes. In this review, the regulation of viral gene expression by methylation is discussed, with particular emphasis on: (1) the virus-specific factors that bind to promoter regions; (2) the implications of this knowledge for designing viral vectors that can be used to deliver genes for the purpose of gene therapy; and (3) the use of this knowledge for the early detection and prevention of cancer. Since methylation can be reversed by a variety of exogenous agents, great potential exists to develop interventions that target cancer-associated aberrant methylation in an effort to reverse or prevent carcinogenesis.

Protein-DNA interaction and CpG methylation at rep*/vIL-10p of latent Epstein-Barr virus genomes in lymphoid cell lines

The viral interleukin-10 promoter (vIL-10p), overlapping the rep* element in the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome, is a promoter element active mostly in the late phase of the lytic cycle and immediately upon infection of B cells. rep* was, through transfection experiments with small plasmids, characterised as a cis element supporting oriP replicative function. In this study, in vivo protein binding and CpG methylation at rep*/vIL-10p were analysed in five cell lines that harbour strictly latent EBV genomes. Contrary to the invariably unmethylated dyad symmetry element (DS) of oriP, rep*/vIL-10p was highly methylated and showed only traces of protein binding in all examined cell lines. This result is in agreement with vIL-10p being an inactive promoter of EBV genomes, and makes it less likely that rep* functions as a replicative element of latent EBV genomes.

Epigenetics of latent Epstein-Barr virus genomes: high resolution methylation analysis of the bidirectional promoter region of latent membrane protein 1 and 2B genes

We analysed the methylation patterns of CpG dinucleotides in a bidirectional promoter region (LRS, LMP 1 regulatory sequences) of latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genomes using automated fluorescent genomic sequencing after bisulfite-induced modification of DNA. Transcripts for two latent membrane proteins, LMP 1 (a transforming protein) and LMP 2B, are initiated in this region in opposite directions. We found that B cell lines and a clone expressing LMP 1 carried EBV genomes with unmethylated or hypomethylated LRS, while highly methylated CpG dinucleotides were present at each position or at discrete sites and within hypermethylated regions in LMP 1 negative cells. Comparison of high resolution methylation maps suggests that CpG methylation-mediated direct interference with binding of nuclear factors LBF 2, 3, 7, AML1/LBF1, LBF5 and LBF6 or methylation of CpGs within an E-box sequence (where activators as well as repressors can bind) is not the major mechanism in silencing of the LMP 1 promoter. Although a role for CpG methylation within binding sites of Sp1 and 3, ATF/CRE and a sis-inducible factor (SIF) cannot be excluded, hypermethylation of LRS or regions within LRS in LMP 1 negative cells suggests a role for an indirect mechanism, via methylcytosine binding proteins, in silencing of the LMP 1 promoter.

Protein-DNA binding and CpG methylation at nucleotide resolution of latency-associated promoters Qp, Cp, and LMP1p of Epstein-Barr virus

Epstein-Barr viral (EBV) latency-associated promoters Qp, Cp, and LMP1p are crucial for the regulated expression of the EBNA and LMP transcripts in dependence of the latency type. By transient transfection and in vitro binding analyses, many promoter elements and transcription factors have previously been shown to be involved in the activities of these promoters. However, the latency promoters have only partially been examined at the nucleotide level in vivo. Therefore, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of in vivo protein binding and CpG methylation patterns at these promoters in five representative cell lines and correlated the results with the known in vitro binding data and activities of these promoters from previous transfection experiments. Promoter activity inversely correlated with the methylation state of promoters, although Qp was a remarkable exception. Novel protein binding data were obtained for all promoters. For Cp, binding correlated well with promoter activity; for LMP1p and Qp, binding patterns looked similar regardless of promoter activity.