1
|
Green AD, Lee GR. An appraisal of the practice of duplicate testing for the detection of irregular analytical errors. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024; 62:627-634. [PMID: 37942778 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our study aimed to determine the usefulness of duplicate testing in identifying irregular analytical errors and subsequent prevention of patient mismanagement. METHODS In our laboratory, all requests for Na+, Ca2+, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and high-sensitivity cardiac-troponin-I (hs-cTnI) are run in duplicate. Data from four separate weeks for Na+ (n=21,649), Ca2+ (n=14,803) and ALP (n=19,698); and a full year for hs-cTnI (n=17,036) were gathered. For each test, pre-defined limits for differences between duplicates were used to identify erroneous results (Fliers). We further characterised a subset of such fliers as "critical errors", where duplicates fell on opposing sides of a reference/decision making threshold. The costs/benefits of running these tests in duplicate were then considered in light of increased number of tests analysed by this approach. RESULTS For Na+, 0.03 % of duplicates met our flier defining criteria, and 0.01 % of specimens were considered critical errors. For Ca2+ requests, 4.58 % of results met our flier defining criteria and 0.84 % were critical errors. For ALP, 0.22 % of results were fliers, and 0.01 % were critical errors. For hs-cTnI, 1.58 % of results were classified as fliers, whilst 0.14 % were classified as a critical error. Depending on the test in question, running all analyses in duplicate increased annual costs by as little as €1,100 (for sodium), and as much as €48,000 (for hs-cTnI). CONCLUSIONS Duplicate testing is effective at identifying and mitigating irregular laboratory errors, and is best suited for assays predisposed to such error, where costs are minimal, and clinical significance of an incorrect result can justify the practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair D Green
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostic Endocrinology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Graham R Lee
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostic Endocrinology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cervinski MA, Bietenbeck A, Katayev A, Loh TP, van Rossum HH, Badrick T. Advances in clinical chemistry patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC). Adv Clin Chem 2023; 117:223-261. [PMID: 37973321 DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control involves monitoring an assay using patient samples rather than external material. If the patient population does not change, then a shift in the long-term assay population results represents the introduction of a change in the assay. The advantages of this approach are that the sample(s) are commutable, it is inexpensive, the rules are simple to interpret and there is virtually continuous monitoring of the assay. The disadvantages are that the laboratory needs to understand their patient population and how they may change during the day, week or year and the initial change of mindset required to adopt the system. The concept is not new, having been used since the 1960s and widely adopted on hematology analyzers in the mid-1970s. It was not widely used in clinical chemistry as there were other stable quality control materials available. However, the limitations of conventional quality control approaches have become more evident. There is a greater understanding of how to collect and use patient data in real time and a range of powerful algorithms which can identify changes in assays. There are more assays on more samples being run. There is also a greater interest in providing a theoretical basis for the validation and integration of these techniques into routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Cervinski
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Andreas Bietenbeck
- Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie Klinikum, Munich, Germany
| | - Alex Katayev
- Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Elon, Burlington, NC, United States
| | | | - Huub H van Rossum
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Huvaros, The Netherlands
| | - Tony Badrick
- RCPA Quality Assurance Programs, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Badrick T, Loh TP. Developing an evidence-based approach to quality control. Clin Biochem 2023; 114:39-42. [PMID: 36736647 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Effective Quality Control remains one of the pillars of Clinical Biochemistry. An understanding of the possible analytical errors that may occur, how to detect them efficiently and how to prevent them from causing patient harm are critical components of a Quality System. For some time, there have been questions about the theoretical basis of the models used to describe and detect analytical error. The current theory recognises two types of error, systematic and random and a system based on sampling the analytical process using a synthetic material to detect these errors. However, there are at least two other errors that are present. One is related to the QC material and the other, irregular errors. In this Opinion Piece, some of the underlying assumptions of Quality Control systems are described and analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Badrick
- RCPA Quality Assurance Programs, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Landin B, Sisowath C, Strålfors A. Factors affecting the evaluation and use of a hemoglobin A2 method – lot-to-lot variation, long-term deviation and carry-over. Clin Chim Acta 2023; 544:117332. [PMID: 37030569 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared two Hb A2 methods, high pressure liquid chromatography and capillary zone electrophoresis, at two occasions. In 2014 the methods showed good agreement, while in 2020 HPLC results were clearly higher than CE results. This finding prompted us to investigate the external quality assessment (EQA) outcome and our total patient results obtained by high pressure liquid chromatography over several years. METHODS The methods compared were Bio-Rad Variant II Beta-Thal Short Program (HPLC) and Sebia Capilllarys Flex Piercing (CE). RESULTS Our annual patient results obtained by HPLC increased significantly from 2014 to 2020. A similar trend was also seen in our EQA results. When patient results were grouped according to different reagent lots it became evident that method comparisons might be severely affected by lot-to-lot variation. We also noticed that samples analyzed with the HPLC method following a sample containing a high proportion of Hb E where prone to give falsely increased Hb A2 results. CONCLUSION Standardization of the measurement of Hb A2 is urgently needed. Furthermore, the lot-to-lot variation must be minimized. While waiting for these improvements each laboratory ought to repeatedly evaluate their distribution of patient Hb A2 results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britta Landin
- Dept. Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden; Dept. Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Christin Sisowath
- Dept. Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annelie Strålfors
- Dept. Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loh TP, Cooke BR, Markus C, Zakaria R, Tran MTC, Ho CS, Greaves RF. Method evaluation in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 61:751-758. [PMID: 36327459 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Method evaluation is one of the critical components of the quality system that ensures the ongoing quality of a clinical laboratory. As part of implementing new methods or reviewing best practices, the peer-reviewed published literature is often searched for guidance. From the outset, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) has a rich history of publishing methods relevant to clinical laboratory medicine. An insight into submissions, from editors' and reviewers' experiences, shows that authors still struggle with method evaluation, particularly the appropriate requirements for validation in clinical laboratory medicine. Here, we consider through a series of discussion points an overview of the status, challenges, and needs of method evaluation from the perspective of clinical laboratory medicine. We identify six key high-level aspects of clinical laboratory method evaluation that potentially lead to inconsistency. 1. Standardisation of terminology, 2. Selection of analytical performance specifications, 3. Experimental design of method evaluation, 4. Sample requirements of method evaluation, 5. Statistical assessment and interpretation of method evaluation data, and 6. Reporting of method evaluation data. Each of these areas requires considerable work to harmonise the practice of method evaluation in laboratory medicine, including more empirical studies to be incorporated into guidance documents that are relevant to clinical laboratories and are freely and widely available. To further close the loop, educational activities and fostering professional collaborations are essential to promote and improve the practice of method evaluation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tze Ping Loh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian R Cooke
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Corey Markus
- Flinders University International Centre for Point-of-Care Testing, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Rosita Zakaria
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mai Thi Chi Tran
- Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, National Children's Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Chung Shun Ho
- Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Unit, Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
| | - Ronda F Greaves
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Plebani M. Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 61:713-720. [PMID: 35969689 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Quality in laboratory medicine is defined as "an unfinished journey", as the more essential the laboratory information provided, the more assured its quality should be. In the past decades, the Journal Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine has provided a valuable forum for garnering new insights into the analytical and extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle, and for debating crucial aspects of quality in clinical laboratories. The impressive number of papers published in the Journal is testimony to the efforts made by laboratory professionals, national and international scientific societies and federations in the quest to continuously improve upon the pre-, intra- and post-analytical steps of the testing cycle, thus enhancing the quality of laboratory information. The paper appearing in this special issue summarizes the most important and interesting contributions published in the Journal, thus updating our knowledge on quality in laboratory medicine and offering further stimuli to identify the most valuable measures of quality in clinical laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Plebani
- Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wauthier L, Plebani M, Favresse J. Interferences in immunoassays: review and practical algorithm. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 60:808-820. [PMID: 35304841 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-1288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Immunoassays are currently the methods of choice for the measurement of a large panel of complex and heterogenous molecules owing to full automation, short turnaround time, high specificity and sensitivity. Despite remarkable performances, immunoassays are prone to several types of interferences that may lead to harmful consequences for the patient (e.g., prescription of an inadequate treatment, delayed diagnosis, unnecessary invasive investigations). A systematic search is only performed for some interferences because of its impracticality in clinical laboratories as it would notably impact budget, turnaround time, and human resources. Therefore, a case-by-case approach is generally preferred when facing an aberrant result. Hereby, we review the current knowledge on immunoassay interferences and present an algorithm for interference workup in clinical laboratories, from suspecting their presence to using the appropriate tests to identify them. We propose an approach to rationalize the attitude of laboratory specialists when faced with a potential interference and emphasize the importance of their collaboration with clinicians and manufacturers to ensure future improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loris Wauthier
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, Namur, Belgium
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Julien Favresse
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, Namur, Belgium
- Department of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for LIfes Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thomas SN, French D, Jannetto PJ, Rappold BA, Clarke WA. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for clinical diagnostics. NATURE REVIEWS. METHODS PRIMERS 2022; 2:96. [PMCID: PMC9735147 DOI: 10.1038/s43586-022-00175-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Mass spectrometry is a powerful analytical tool used for the analysis of a wide range of substances and matrices; it is increasingly utilized for clinical applications in laboratory medicine. This Primer includes an overview of basic mass spectrometry concepts, focusing primarily on tandem mass spectrometry. We discuss experimental considerations and quality management, and provide an overview of some key applications in the clinic. Lastly, the Primer discusses significant challenges for implementation of mass spectrometry in clinical laboratories and provides an outlook of where there are emerging clinical applications for this technology. Tandem mass spectrometry is increasingly utilized for clinical applications in laboratory medicine. In this Primer, Thomas et al. discuss experimental considerations and quality management for implementing clinical tandem mass spectrometry in the clinic with an overview of some key applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefani N. Thomas
- grid.17635.360000000419368657Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | - Deborah French
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Paul J. Jannetto
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Brian A. Rappold
- grid.419316.80000 0004 0550 1859Research and Development, Labcorp, Burlington, NC USA
| | - William A. Clarke
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yilmaz NS, Sen B, Gulbahar O. Contribution of the laboratory to a diagnosis process by sequential reflective testing: Paraprotein interference on a direct bilirubin assay. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2021; 31:020801. [PMID: 33927558 PMCID: PMC8047781 DOI: 10.11613/bm.2021.020801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Errors in laboratory medicine occur in the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical phases. The errors are mostly detected in the preanalytical period. However, analytical errors are still an important source of error, despite their frequency is reduced significantly in years thanks to developments in laboratories. In this case, an analytical error was noticed during the verification of a patient’s results. The direct bilirubin of a 66-year-old male patient admitted to the emergency department was higher than the total bilirubin. The patient’s symptoms were fatigue and dyspnoea. Albumin and haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations of the patient were significantly low. After considering the patient’s demographics and laboratory results, the laboratory specialist suspected a paraproteinemia interference. Total protein was performed as a reflective test. The albumin/globulin ratio was reversed. Thereafter, serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) were performed as another reflective tests, respectively. SPEP and IFE results were in favour of monoclonal gammopathy. The patient was directed to a haematologist, underwent a bone marrow biopsy, and the result was reported as Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia with plasma cell differentiation expressing IgM-Kappa. The patient went on a chemotherapy protocol, and his condition has been improved in subsequent months. Detection of analytical errors is of great importance, like in our case, and may be used as a tool to identify patients who have not yet been diagnosed. The laboratory specialist must dominate the entire process of each test in the laboratory, be aware of the limitations of tests, and turn these disadvantages into advantages when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niyazi Samet Yilmaz
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Polatli Duatepe State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bayram Sen
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Research and Training Hospital, Rize, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Gulbahar
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zaninotto M, Plebani M. Understanding and managing interferences in clinical laboratory assays: the role of laboratory professionals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021; 58:350-356. [PMID: 31622245 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The recently raised concerns regarding biotin interference in immunoassays have increased the awareness of laboratory professionals and clinicians of the evidence that the analytical phase is still vulnerable to errors, particularly as analytical interferences may lead to erroneous results and risks for patient safety. The issue of interference in laboratory testing, which is not new, continues to be a challenge deserving the concern and interest of laboratory professionals and clinicians. Analytical interferences should be subdivided into two types on the basis of the possibility of their detection before the analytical process. The first (type 1) is represented by lipemia, hemolysis and icterus, and the second (type 2), by unusual constituents that are not undetectable before analysis, and may affect the matrix of serum/plasma of individual subjects. Type 2 cannot be identified with current techniques when performing the pre-analytical phase. Therefore, in addition to a more careful evaluation and validation of the method to be used in clinical practice, the awareness of laboratory professionals should be raised as to the importance of evaluating the quality of biological samples before analysis and to adopt algorithms and approaches in the attempt to reduce problems related to erroneous results due to specific or non-specific interferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Zaninotto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
After another decade: LC-MS/MS became routine in clinical diagnostics. Clin Biochem 2020; 82:2-11. [PMID: 32188572 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Tandem mass spectrometry - especially in combination with liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS) - is applied in a multitude of important diagnostic niches of laboratory medicine. It is unquestioned in its routine use and is often unreplaceable by alternative technologies. This overview illustrates the development in the past decade (2009-2019) and intends to provide insight into the current standing and future directions of the field. The instrumentation matured significantly, the applications are well understood, and the in vitro diagnostics (IVD) industry is shaping the market by providing assay kits, certified instruments, and the first laboratory automated LC-MS/MS instruments as an analytical core. In many settings the application of LC-MS/MS is still burdensome with locally lab developed test (LDT) designs relying on highly specialized staff. The current routine applications cover a wide range of analytes in therapeutic drug monitoring, endocrinology including newborn screening, and toxicology. The tasks that remain to be mastered are, for example, the quantification of proteins by means of LC-MS/MS and the transition from targeted to untargeted omics approaches relying on pattern recognition/pattern discrimination as a key technology for the establishment of diagnostic decisions.
Collapse
|
12
|
Aita A, Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The silk road to total quality in Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 57:769-772. [PMID: 30982003 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ada Aita
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Sciacovelli
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus-Personalized Therapy: Second Consensus Report. Ther Drug Monit 2019; 41:261-307. [DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
14
|
Brunet M, van Gelder T, Åsberg A, Haufroid V, Hesselink DA, Langman L, Lemaitre F, Marquet P, Seger C, Shipkova M, Vinks A, Wallemacq P, Wieland E, Woillard JB, Barten MJ, Budde K, Colom H, Dieterlen MT, Elens L, Johnson-Davis KL, Kunicki PK, MacPhee I, Masuda S, Mathew BS, Millán O, Mizuno T, Moes DJAR, Monchaud C, Noceti O, Pawinski T, Picard N, van Schaik R, Sommerer C, Vethe NT, de Winter B, Christians U, Bergan S. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus-Personalized Therapy: Second Consensus Report. Ther Drug Monit 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000640
expr 845143713 + 809233716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
|
15
|
Marlar RA, Rollins-Raval MA. Sources and solutions for spurious test results in coagulation. Int J Lab Hematol 2019; 41 Suppl 1:162-169. [PMID: 31069971 DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
In the coagulation laboratory, much emphasis has been placed on rapid and accurate testing; however, spurious results that are inaccurate and do not reflect the actual status of the patient can potentially lead to an incorrect diagnosis and altered intervention. Errors in coagulation results and interpretation can occur at any point of the process from obtaining the specimen to interpretation and use of the result by the clinician. The main sources of error include the patient's biological and preanalytical variation, analytical testing, and postanalytical use of the reported result(s). This article reviews various sources of error leading to spurious results, providing methods to recognize these aberrant results and presenting solutions for minimizing their occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Marlar
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Marian A Rollins-Raval
- Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Abstract
Owing to their virtually incomparable olfactory apparatus and the mutual loving relationship with man, the use of dogs for assisting humans in many activities has become commonplace. Dogs have been used for long for livestock herding, hunting and pulling. More recently, they have been employed for servicing or assisting people with disabilities, for rescuing, for pet therapy and, last but not least, for detecting a vast array of volatile organic compounds related to drugs, narcotics, explosives and foods. Although cancer detection seems the most distinguished use of “man’s best friends” in science and medicine, increasing emphasis is being placed on their capacity to perceive chemical changes or human expressions associated with harmful, even life-threating, blood glucose variations. The evidence available in the current scientific literature attests that diabetes alerting dogs (DADs) have a heterogeneous efficiency for warning owners of episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, with sensitivities and specificities ranging between 0.29–0.80 and 0.49–0.96, respectively. Although the adoption of DADs seems effective for improving the quality of life of many diabetics patients, some important drawbacks can be highlighted. These typically include adoption and keeping expenditures, lack of certification or accreditation of dog providers, poor harmonization of training procedures, significant inter-breed, intra-breed and intra-dog variabilities, wide-ranging alert behaviors, ability of owners to identify dog’s alerts, as well as lack of quality assessment of a dog’s “diagnostic” performance. Overcoming many of these limitations shall probably make DADs more efficient tools for improving diabetes management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Lippi
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry , University Hospital of Verona , Piazzale LA Scuro , 37134 Verona , Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine , University Hospital of Padova , Padova , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clerico A, Belloni L, Carrozza C, Correale M, Dittadi R, Dotti C, Fortunato A, Vignati G, Zucchelli GC, Migliardi M. A Black Swan in clinical laboratory practice: the analytical error due to interferences in immunoassay methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56:397-402. [PMID: 29220884 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
It is well known that the results of immunoassay methods can be affected by specific or non-specific interferences, ranging from 0.4% to 4.0%. The presence of interference may greatly compromise the accuracy of immunoassay analyses causing an error in the measurement, producing false-positive or false-negative results. From a clinical point of view, these analytical errors may have serious implications for patient care because they can cause misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment. Unfortunately, it is a very difficult task to identify the irregular analytical errors related to immunoassay methods because they are not detectable by normal laboratory quality control procedures, are reproducible within the test system, may be clinically plausible and are relatively rare. The first line of defense against erroneous results is to use in laboratory practice only immunoassay systems with the highest level of robustness against interference. The second line of defense is always taking into account the possibility of interference in immunoassay results. A correct approach should be addressed on identification of samples at high risk of interference. The attainment of this goal requires a critical review of the test result in relation to patient's clinical conditions and literature data, taking into account the analytical characteristics of the immunoassay system. The experts in immunoassay systems should make every effort to find some specific and reliable quality indicators for irregular analytical errors in order to better detect and monitor erroneous immunoassay results due to specific or non-specific interferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Clerico
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Endocrinology and Cell Biology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione CNR Toscana G. Monasterio, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Via Trieste 41, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Lucia Belloni
- Dipartimento di Medicina di laboratorio, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Carrozza
- Laboratorio Analisi 1, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Roma, Italy
| | - Mario Correale
- Clinical Pathology Unit, IRCCS De Bellis, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
| | - Ruggero Dittadi
- Medicina di Laboratorio, Ospedale dell'Angelo ULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, Italy
| | - Claudio Dotti
- Dipartimento di Medicina di laboratorio, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Antonio Fortunato
- U.O.C. Patologia Clinica, ASUR Marche Area Vasta 5, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Migliardi
- S.C. Laboratorio Analisi, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Plebani M. Quality and future of clinical laboratories: the Vico’s whole cyclical theory of the recurring cycles. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56:901-908. [DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
In the last few decades, laboratory medicine has undergone monumental changes, and laboratory technology, which has made enormous advances, now has new clinical applications thanks to the identification of a growing number of biomarkers and risk factors conducive to the promotion of predictive and preventive interventions that have enhanced the role of laboratory medicine in health care delivering. However, the paradigm shift in the past 50 years has led to a gap between laboratory and clinic, with an increased risk of inappropriateness in test request and interpretation, as well as the consolidation of analytical work in focused factories and megastructurers oriented only toward achieving greater volumes, decreasing cost per test and generating a vision of laboratory services as simple commodities. A careful historical revision of the changing models for delivering laboratory services in the United States leads to the prediction that there are several reasons for counteracting the vision of clinical laboratory as a commodity, and restoring the true nature of laboratory services as an integral part of the diagnosis and therapy process. The present study, which reports on internal and external drivers for change, proposes an integrated vision of quality in laboratory medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Plebani
- Department of Medicine-DIMED , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine , University-Hospital of Padova , Padova , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Plebani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine , University-Hospital of Padua , Via Giustiniani 2 , 35128 Padua , Italy , Phone: +39 0498212792, Fax: +39 049663240
| |
Collapse
|