DFS70 Autoantibodies: Clinical Utility in Antinuclear Antibody Testing

BACKGROUND

Screening for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells is helpful for the diagnosis and classification of ANA-associated rheumatic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease, systemic sclerosis, and inflammatory myopathies. The dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern is a special HEp-2 IIF pattern (produced by anti-DFS70 antibodies) because it is not associated with a specific medical condition and therefore can obfuscate interpretation.

CONTENT

In this paper, detection methods for and clinical associations of anti-DFS70 antibodies are reviewed.

SUMMARY

The target antigen of the antibodies that cause the DFS pattern is a 70 kDa protein (DFS70). Commercial methods that detect antibodies to full-length or truncated DFS70 are available for use in clinical laboratories (ELISA, chemiluminescence, dot/line blot). Anti-DFS70 can be found in (apparently) healthy individuals (with a higher frequency in young individuals and in females), in several (inflammatory) conditions and in malignancy. There is no clinical association that is well-established. Special attention (and critical reflection) is given to the observation that monospecific anti-DFS70 (i.e., in the absence of antibodies that are linked to ANA-associated rheumatic diseases) is rarely found in ANA-associated rheumatic diseases.

The significance of dense fine speckled pattern in antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease and coexisting autoantibodies: A propensity score-matched cohort study

AIM

To investigate the relationship between the prevalence of antinuclear antibody (ANA) -associated rheumatic diseases (AARD) and the presence of dense fine speckled (DFS) and homogeneous patterns in ANA tests.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with either a DFS or homogeneous pattern in their ANA test. A mixed pattern was defined as the presence of more than one pattern reported in the test. The presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies and other common autoantibodies were detected using EUROLINE ANA Profile 23. A 1:2 propensity score matching was applied to control for demographic and other interfering factors.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients with a DFS pattern were enrolled and compared with a matched homogeneous group. The DFS group had a significantly lower prevalence of AARD (3.4% vs. 16.9%, p = .008) and the subgroup with anti-DFS70 antibodies showed an even lower prevalence (2% vs. 20%, p = .002). Among the 33 patients with monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies, five had a mixed pattern, and all patients with common autoantibodies had an isolated DFS pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that patients with a DFS pattern in their ANA test may have a lower prevalence of AARD compared with those with a homogeneous pattern. However, an isolated DFS pattern in ANA testing does not necessarily indicate the presence of monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies or AARD. Confirmatory testing for the monospecific anti-DFS70 antibody is mandatory to exclude AARD.

Anti-dense fine speckled 70 (DFS70) autoantibodies: correlates and increasing prevalence in the United States

Objective

Recent studies report high-titer anti-dense fine speckled 70 (DFS70) autoantibodies in persons with inflammatory conditions, but the clinical significance remains unclear. Our goals were to estimate anti-DFS70 autoantibody prevalence, identify correlates, and assess time trends.

Methods

Serum antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were measured by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells in 13,519 participants ≥12 years old from three time periods (1988-1991, 1999-2004, 2011-2012) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. ANA-positive participants with dense fine speckled staining were evaluated for anti-DFS70 antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We used logistic models adjusted for survey-design variables to estimate period-specific anti-DFS70 antibody prevalence in the US, and we further adjusted for sex, age, and race/ethnicity to identify correlates and assess time trends.

Results

Women were more likely than men (odds ratio (OR)=2.97), black persons were less likely than white persons (OR=0.60), and active smokers were less likely than nonsmokers (OR=0.28) to have anti-DFS70 antibodies. The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies increased from 1.6% in 1988-1991 to 2.5% in 1999-2004 to 4.0% in 2011-2012, which corresponds to 3.2 million, 5.8 million, and 10.4 million seropositive individuals, respectively. This increasing time trend in the US population (P<0.0001) was modified in some subgroups and was not explained by concurrent changes in tobacco smoke exposure. Some, but not all, anti-DFS70 antibody correlates and time trends resembled those reported for total ANA.

Conclusion

More research is needed to elucidate anti-DFS70 antibody triggers, their pathologic or potentially protective influences on disease, and their possible clinical implications.

The Nuclear Dense Fine Speckled (DFS) Immunofluorescence Pattern: Not All Roads Lead to DFS70/LEDGFp75

The monospecific dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) pattern is considered a potential marker to aid in exclusion of antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). This pattern is typically produced by autoantibodies against transcription co-activator DFS70/LEDGFp75, which are frequently found in healthy individuals and patients with miscellaneous inflammatory conditions. In AARD patients, these antibodies usually co-exist with disease-associated ANAs. Previous studies reported the occurrence of monospecific autoantibodies that generate a DFS-like or pseudo-DFS IFA pattern but do not react with DFS70/LEDGFp75. We characterized this pattern using confocal microscopy and immunoblotting. The target antigen associated with this pattern partially co-localized with DFS70/LEDGFp75 and its interacting partners H3K36me2, an active chromatin marker, and MLL, a transcription factor, in HEp-2 cells, suggesting a role in transcription. Immunoblotting did not reveal a common protein band immunoreactive with antibodies producing the pseudo-DFS pattern, suggesting they may recognize diverse proteins or conformational epitopes. Given the subjectivity of the HEp-2 IFA test, the awareness of pseudo-DFS autoantibodies reinforces recommendations for confirmatory testing when reporting patient antibodies producing a putative DFS pattern in a clinical setting. Future studies should focus on defining the potential diagnostic utility of the pseudo-DFS pattern and its associated antigen(s).

Anti-DFS70 antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence in a large Chinese cohort and an unexpected association with anti-dsDNA antibodies by a long-term follow-up

Objective

Monospecific autoantibodies to dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) antigen are purported to aid in excluding systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the non-isolated anti-DFS70 still has a certain prevalence in SLE patients, and the clinical significance remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, clinical relevance, and value of long-term monitoring of anti-DFS70 antibodies in SLE patients.

Methods

Anti-DFS70 antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 851 SLE patients, 211 healthy individuals, and 194 patients with other SARD (except SLE). Demographic, serological, and clinical associations of anti-DFS70 antibodies were analyzed by a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model. The correlation of anti-DFS70 with anti-dsDNA, anti-C1q, and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) was analyzed. Sixty-one SLE patients with follow-up time ranging from 2 to 57 months were measured anti-DFS70 antibodies using both ELISA and line immunoassay. The dynamic variations of anti-DFS70 antibodies were evaluated with anti-dsDNA, anti-C1q, and SLEDAI-2K during the follow-up.

Results

The prevalence of anti-DFS70 was significantly higher in SLE (20.7% (176/851)) than in healthy individuals (9.5% (20/211), p = 0.0002) and other SARD (10.8% (21/194), p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that anti-DFS70-positive SLE patients were associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR) = 0.982; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.969, 0.995), higher frequencies of anti-dsDNA (OR 1.598; 95% CI 1.107, 2.306) and anti-PCNA (OR 6.101; 95% CI 2.534, 14.688), and higher levels of serum IgG (OR 1.097; 95% CI 1.067, 1.129) and were more likely to be accompanied by mucosal ulcers (OR 5.921; 95% CI 1.652, 21.215). The O.D. value of anti-DFS70 positively correlated with levels of anti-dsDNA (r = 0.183, p < 0.0001) and anti-C1q (r = 0.181, p < 0.0001), respectively, but not with SLEDAI-2K (p = 0.920). During the follow-up, 49 (42 negative and 7 positive) patients remained stable with anti-DFS70 levels. The other 12 patients experienced significant changes in anti-DFS70, and 83.3% (10/12) of them showed similar trends between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA by evaluation of dynamic variations.

Conclusion

Anti-DFS70 antibodies seem to be prevalent in Chinese SLE patients. The positive association of anti-DFS70 with anti-dsDNA and consistent dynamic variation between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA during the follow-up suggested a potential relationship between anti-DFS70 and anti-dsDNA in patients with SLE.

Analysis of Ana/Dfs70 Pattern in a Large Cohort of Autoimmune/Autoinflammatory Diseases Compared with First Degree Relatives and Healthy Controls Evaluated from Colombia

Background: The presence of Antinuclear antibodies/Dense Fine Speckled 70 (ANA/DFS70) has been proposed as a negative biomarker in the process of exclusion of systemic autoimmune/autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (SARD). The purpose was to evaluate and characterize ANA/DFS70 patients in a large Colombian population with SARD; rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Psoriasis (PsO), Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), first-degree relatives of (FDR), and healthy controls (HC). Methods: ANA determination was performed using indirect immunofluorescence. Samples with positive dense fine granular staining in the nucleoplasm of the interphase cell (AC2) fluorescence were confirmed with CytoBead/ANA and ANA/modified (Knocked out for the PSPI1 gen). Results: 530 mestizo Colombian participants were included. ANA/DFS70 antibody positivity in the whole group was 2.3%, and 0.8% in SARD; no RA patients were positive. ANA/DFS70 positives in UCTD were three women; the average time of evolution of the disease was 9.4 years. The most frequent clinical findings were arthralgias, non-erosive arthritis, and Raynaud’s phenomenon. The PsO positive was a woman with C-reactive protein (CRP) positivity and a negative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) without any other positive autoantibody or extracutaneous manifestation. FDR and HC positives were 7/8 women. All were negative for other autoantibodies. Conclusions: ANA/DFS70 autoantibodies were present in Colombian patients with SARD at a shallow frequency, they were more prevalent in healthy individuals.

Low Prevalence of Anti-DFS70 Antibodies in Children With ANA-Associated Autoimmune Disease

INTRODUCTION

Anti-DFS70 antibodies occur in healthy individuals with various medical conditions. Unlike other anti-nuclear autoantibodies (ANA), they are not associated with systemic autoimmune disease in adult patients. To date, only a few studies have addressed the prevalence and/or clinical relevance of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in children with and without autoimmune disease.

METHODS

Included in this retrospective cross-sectional mono-centric study were 308 pediatric patients with suspected or known autoimmune conditions who had a positive ANA in indirect immune fluorescence (IIF) screening and who were screened for anti-DFS70 antibodies by extractable nuclear antigen antibodies (ENA) immunoblot. Patients were assigned to four different diagnostic categories according to their diagnosis in the corresponding medical record: (a) absence of autoimmune or rheumatic disease (noARD, n = 116); (b) suspected autoimmunity without definitive diagnosis (sAI, n = 48); (c) other rheumatic disease (ORD) (n = 115); and (d) ANA-associated autoimmune disease (AARD, n = 29).

RESULTS

The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in the overall cohort was 33.8%. Among children without ARD (46.6%, 54/116), prevalence was significantly higher than among children with ORD (23.7%, 27/115, p = 0.0003) or AARD (17.2%, 5/29, p = 0.0054). Among all of the anti-DFS70 positive patients with AARD, other autoantibodies were found in the ENA immunoblot. In contrast, among anti-DFS70 positive patients with ORD (11.5%, 4/27), sAI (33.3%, 6/18) and noARD (16.7%, 9/54), other autoantibodies infrequently were detected (p = 0.0005). Patients with uveitis rarely were positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies (7.7%, 1/13). No association was found between anti-DFS70 antibodies and a history of allergic conditions (p = 0.51). The concordance between a typical DFS pattern in IIF and the detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies by immunoblot was 59.3%.

CONCLUSION

As with adults, the higher prevalence of anti-DFS70 among children without autoimmune disease confirms the mutual exclusion for this autoantibody in the pathogenesis of ARD. Among ANA-positive children, monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies may help to discriminate between AARD and not-AARD-related conditions.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) as a criterion for classification and diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases

The classification and diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases are frequently based on a collection of criteria composed of clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathology elements that are strongly associated with the respective disease. Autoantibodies are a distinctive hallmark and have a prominent position in the classification criteria of many autoimmune diseases. The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA), historically known as the antinuclear antibody test, is a method capable of detecting a wide spectrum of autoantibodies. A positive HEp-2 IFA test is part of the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), as well as the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). A positive HEp-2 IFA test can appear as different morphological patterns that are indicative of the most probable autoantibody specificities in the sample. Only some of the HEp-2 IFA patterns are associated with the specific autoantibodies relevant to SLE, JIA, AIH, and PBC, whereas some other patterns occur mainly in non-related conditions and even in apparently healthy individuals. This paper provides a critical review on the subject and proposes that the classification and diagnostic criteria for SLE, JIA, AIH, and PBC could be improved by a modification on the HEp-2 IFA (ANA) criterion in that the staining patterns accepted for each of these diseases should be restricted according to the respective relevant autoantibody specificities.

•

Autoantibodies play a prominent role in the classification or diagnostic criteria of many autoimmune diseases.

•

ANA test is part of the classification criteria for SLE and JIA, as well as the diagnostic criteria for AIH.

•

Different HEp-2 IFA patterns indicate different autoantibodies and only some are associated with a specific disease.

•

ANA classification/diagnostic criteria should reflect the HEp-2 IFA patterns associated to the relevant autoantibodies.

Autoantibodies to dense-fine-speckled 70 (DFS70) do not necessarily rule out connective tissue diseases

OBJECTIVES

In some patients with antinuclear antibodies (ANA), a pattern called anti-dense-fine-speckled-70 antibody (anti-DFS70) can be detected. Presence of anti-DFS70 is less frequently observed in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) and is therefore used as an exclusion criterion by some rheumatologists. To date, however, it is unclear as to what extent the presence of an anti-DFS70 can reliably rule out CTDs.

METHODS

Data of 460 patients who were tested for the presence of anti-DFS70 at University Hospital Bonn, Germany, were analyzed. Patients were examined with regard to clinical symptoms and signs, type of disease, type of CTD, fulfillment of the classification criteria, presence of anti-DFS70, other systemic autoantibodies and ANA titers by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assays and line immunoassays. Differences in DFS70 antibody status between patients with CTD were examined. In addition, specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive values for different ANA titers were calculated.

RESULTS

In 182 of the 460 patients (of whom 79.8% were female), CTD was diagnosed. 354 patients (77.0%) tested negative, 81 (17.6%) positive and 25 (5.4%) borderline for anti-DFS70. Twenty-one patients (25.9%) with a positive result had CTD. No significant differences were observed between anti-DFS70 positive and anti-DFS70 negative patients with CTD concerning age, gender, symptoms, clinical signs, and other disease-specific antibodies. However, of these 21 patients, only one patient showed the monospecific appearance of anti-DFS70. Anti-DFS70 had a sensitivity and a specificity of 26.9% and 86.8%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 68.2% at an ANA titer of ≥1:160 with respect to the absence of CTD.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoantibodies to DFS70 seem to be prevalent in CTD patients and are thus not a good exclusion criterion. The monospecific occurrence of anti-DFS70 can, however, be helpful in ambiguous situations.

Strong Association of the Myriad Discrete Speckled Nuclear Pattern With Anti-SS-A/Ro60 Antibodies: Consensus Experience of Four International Expert Centers

Introduction

The morphological patterns in indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) reflect the autoantibodies in the sample. The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) classifies 30 relevant patterns (AC-0 to AC-29). AC-4 (fine speckled nuclear pattern) is associated to anti-SS-A/Ro, anti-SS-B/La, and several autoantibodies. Anti-SS-A/Ro samples may contain antibodies to Ro60 and Ro52. A variation of AC-4 (herein designated AC-4a), characterized by myriad discrete nuclear speckles, was reported to be associated with anti-SS-A/Ro. The plain fine speckled pattern (herein designated AC-4b) seldom was associated with anti-SS-A/Ro. This study reports the experience of four expert laboratories on AC-4a and AC-4b.

Methods

Anti-Ro60 monoclonal antibody A7 was used to investigate the HEp-2 IFA pattern. Records containing concomitant HEp-2 IFA and SS-A/Ro tests from Durand Laboratory, Argentina (n = 383) and Fleury Laboratory, Brazil (n = 144,471) were analyzed for associations between HEp-2 IFA patterns and disease-associated autoantibodies (DAA): double-stranded DNA, Scl-70, nucleosome, SS-B/La, Sm, and U1-RNP. A total of 381 samples from Dresden Technical University (TU-Dresden), Germany, were assayed for HEp-2 IFA and DAA.

Results

Monoclonal A7 recognized Ro60 in Western blot and immunoprecipitation, and yielded the AC-4a pattern on HEp-2 IFA. Analyses from Durand Laboratory and Fleury Laboratory yielded compatible results: AC-4a was less frequent (8.9% and 2.7%, respectively) than AC-4b (26.1% and 24.2%) in HEp-2 IFA-positive samples. Reactivity to SS-A/Ro occurred in 67.6% and 96.3% of AC-4a-pattern samples against 23% and 6.8% of AC-4b pattern samples. Reciprocally, AC-4a occurred in 24% and 47.1% of anti-SS-A/Ro-positive samples, and in 3.8% and 0.1% of anti-SS-A/Ro-negative samples. Data from TU-Dresden show that the AC-4a pattern occurred in 69% of 169 anti-SS-A/Ro-monospecific samples (62% of all anti-SS-A/Ro-positive samples) and in 4% of anti-SS-A/Ro-negative samples, whereas anti-SS-A/Ro occurred in 98.3% of AC-4a samples and in 47.9% of AC-4b samples. In all laboratories, coexistence of anti-SS-B/La, but not other DAA, in anti-SS-A/Ro-positive samples did not disturb the AC-4a pattern. AC-4a was predominantly associated with anti-Ro60 antibodies.

Conclusions

This study confirms the association of AC-4a pattern and anti-SS-A/Ro in opposition to the AC-4b pattern. The results of four international expert laboratories support the worldwide applicability of these AC-4 pattern variants and their incorporation into ICAP classification under codes AC-4a and AC-4b, respectively. The AC-4 pattern should be maintained as an umbrella pattern for cases in which one cannot discriminate AC-4a and AC-4b patterns. The acknowledgment of the AC-4a pattern should add value to HEp-2 IFA interpretation.

Anti-DFS70 Antibodies for Differentiating Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease in Patients with Positive ANA Tests: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anti-DFS70 antibodies have been proposed as a marker to exclude systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). We conducted this systematic diagnostic test accuracy review and meta-analysis to determine the performance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in patients with a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) test result to exclude SARD. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library up to 22 February 2021, and included studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of anti-DFS70 antibodies in patients with a positive ANA test result. The results were pooled using a hierarchical bivariate model and plotted in summary receiver operating characteristic curves. R software and Stata Statistical Software were used for the statistical analysis. Eight studies with 4168 patients were included. The summary sensitivity was 0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.28) and the specificity was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.88–0.96). The area under the curve was 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.72). The meta-regression analysis showed that targeting only ANA-associated rheumatic disease was associated with higher specificity. In addition, the studies with a non-SARD prevalence of <80% and using a chemiluminescence assay were associated with higher specificity. Anti-DFS70 antibodies have high specificity for the exclusion of SARD among patients presenting with a positive ANA test, but the sensitivity is low.

Serological abnormalities that predict progression to systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases in antinuclear antibody positive individuals

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the auto-antibody (auto-Ab) profiles in anti-nuclear antibody-positive (ANA+) individuals lacking Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease (SARD) and early SARD patients, to determine the key differences between these groups and identify factors that are associated with an increased risk of symptomatic progression within the next two years in ANA+ individuals.

METHODS

Using custom antigen (Ag) microarrays, 144 IgM and IgG auto-Abs were surveyed in 84 asymptomatic and 123 symptomatic (48 undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) and 75 SARD patients) ANA+ individuals. Auto-Ab were compared in ANA+ individuals lacking a SARD diagnosis with ≥ 2 years follow-up (n = 52), including all those who demonstrated progression (n = 14) during this period, with changes over time assessed in a representative subset.

RESULTS

We show that ANA+ individuals have auto-Ab to many self-Ag that are not being captured by current screening techniques and very high levels of these auto-Abs are predominantly restricted to early SARD patients, with SLE patients displaying reactivity to many more auto-Ags than the other groups. In general, the symptoms that developed in progressors mirrored those seen in SARD patients with similar patterns of auto-Ab. Only anti-Ro52 Abs were found to predict progression (positive predictive value 46%, negative predictive value 89%). Surprisingly, over 2 years follow-up the levels of auto-Ab remained remarkably stable regardless of whether individuals progressed or not.

CONCLUSION

Our findings strongly argue that development of assays with an expanded set of auto-Ags and enhanced dynamic range would improve the diagnostic and prognostic ability of auto-Ab testing.

Prevalence of anti-dense fine speckled 70 antibodies in healthy individuals and patients with antinuclear antibody-associated autoimmune rheumatic diseases in Japan

Previous studies from various countries have reported anti-dense fine speckled pattern (DFS)70 antibody prevalence but few studies have been from Asia. We investigated the prevalence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in a Japanese cohort of healthy individuals (HI) and patients with antinuclear antibody-associated autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AARD).Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect immunofluorescence were performed using samples from 250 HI and 276 AARD patients.The overall anti-DFS70 antibody prevalence in HI was 16.4%, with 12.8% for males and 20.0% for females (sex difference; P = .12). In AARD patients, the anti-DFS70 antibody prevalence in systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM), Sjögren syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was 22.1%, 14.3%, 14.3%, 3.0%, 21.3%, and 18.1%, respectively (no significant difference between AARD patients except DM/PM and HI). The prevalence of isolated anti-DFS70 antibody in HI and all AARD patients excluding RA was 14.8% (37/250) and 4.4% (9/204), respectively (P  < .01 vs HI). Among anti-DFS70 antibody-positive cases, 63.4% (26/41) were DFS pattern by IIF and 23.5% (8/34) were HI and AARD patients excluding RA, respectively.The anti-DFS70 antibody prevalence in HI and AARD patients in Japan was similar. Furthermore, the anti-DFS70 antibody prevalence in HI and AARD in Japan is higher than in HI and AARD in regions other than Asia. This makes AARD differential diagnosis by antinuclear antibody screening difficult.

Antinuclear Autoantibodies in Health: Autoimmunity Is Not a Synonym of Autoimmune Disease

The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing is a critical tool for their diagnosis. However, ANA prevalence in healthy persons has increased over the last decades, especially among young people. ANA in health occurs in low concentrations, with a prevalence up to 50% in some populations, which demands a cutoff revision. This review deals with the origin and probable physiological or compensatory function of ANA in health, according to the concept of immunological clearance, theory of autoimmune regulation of cell functions, and the concept of functional autoantibodies. Considering ANA titers ≤1:320 as a serological marker of autoimmune diseases seems inappropriate. The role of anti-DFS70/LEDGFp75 autoantibodies is highlighted as a possible anti-risk biomarker for autoimmune rheumatic disorders. ANA prevalence in health is different in various regions due to several underlying causes discussed in the review, all influencing additive combinations according to the concept of the mosaic of autoimmunity. Not only are titers, but also HEp-2 IFA) staining patterns, such as AC-2, important. Accepting autoantibodies as a kind of bioregulator, not only the upper, but also the lower borders of their normal range should be determined; not only their excess, but also a lack of them or "autoimmunodeficiency" could be the reason for disorders.

Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey

Background

The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns.

Methods

Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians.

Results

438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories.

Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences.

Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative.

Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest.

Conclusion

This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.

Twenty years of research on the DFS70/LEDGF autoantibody-autoantigen system: many lessons learned but still many questions

The discovery and initial characterization 20 years ago of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) presenting a dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern with strong staining of mitotic chromosomes, detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay in HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IIFA test), has transformed our view on ANAs. Traditionally, ANAs have been considered as reporters of abnormal immunological events associated with the onset and progression of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), also called ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD), as well as clinical biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of these diseases. However, based on our current knowledge, it is not apparent that autoantibodies presenting the DFS IIF pattern fall into these categories. These antibodies invariably target a chromatin-associated protein designated as dense fine speckled protein of 70 kD (DFS70), also known as lens epithelium-derived growth factor protein of 75 kD (LEDGF/p75) and PC4 and SFRS1 Interacting protein 1 (PSIP1). This multi-functional protein, hereafter referred to as DFS70/LEDGF, plays important roles in the formation of transcription complexes in active chromatin, transcriptional activation of specific genes, regulation of mRNA splicing, DNA repair, and cellular survival against stress. Due to its multiple functions, it has emerged as a key protein contributing to several human pathologies, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), leukemia, cancer, ocular diseases, and Rett syndrome. Unlike other ANAs, "monospecific" anti-DFS70/LEDGF autoantibodies (only detectable ANA in serum) are not associated with SARD and have been detected in healthy individuals and some patients with non-SARD inflammatory conditions. These observations have led to the hypotheses that these antibodies could be considered as negative biomarkers of SARD and might even play a protective or beneficial role. In spite of 20 years of research on this autoantibody-autoantigen system, its biological and clinical significance still remains enigmatic. Here we review the current state of knowledge of this system, focusing on the lessons learned and posing emerging questions that await further scrutiny as we continue our quest to unravel its significance and potential clinical and therapeutic utility.