The effects of midazolam and morphine on analgesic and sedative activity of ketamine in rats

Effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on motor coordination and analgesia: a comparative analysis

Objective

We compared the effects of 2 sedative drugs, dexmedetomidine and midazolam, on motor performance and analgesic efficacy in a rat model.

Materials and methods

Rats were randomly divided into the following 4 groups on the basis of the treatment received. The first group received 83 µg/kg/min midazolam; the second, 1 µg/kg/min dexmedetomidine; the third, 83 µg/kg/min morphine; and the fourth was a control group. The rats were measured motor coordination and pain reflexes by using rotarod, accelerod, hot plate, and tail flick tests.

Results

At all the tested speeds, the midazolam-injected rats remained on the rotarod longer than did the dexmedetomidine-injected rats. Furthermore, in the 10-minute accelerod test, the midazolam-injected rats remained for a longer duration than did the dexmedetomidine-injected rats. The latency time for the hot plate test was significantly higher at 10 minutes and 20 minutes in the dexmedetomidine group than in the midazolam group. Further, the latency time at 10 minutes for the tail flick test was greater in the dexmedetomidine group than in the midazolam group.

Conclusions

In this rat model, midazolam results in faster recovery of motor coordination performance when compared with dexmedetomidine.

Midazolam enhances the analgesic properties of dexmedetomidine in the rat

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the analgesic properties of different dose combinations of midazolam and dexmedetomidine administered intraperitoneally (IP) in the rat.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective experimental trial.

ANIMALS

Seventy adult male Sprague Dawley rats weighing 250-300 g.

METHODS

Dexmedetomidine (D) 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15, 0.18, 0.21 mg kg(-1) and midazolam (M) 5, 10, 25, 50 mg kg(-1) were administered IP, alone then in combinations ranging from 0.03 D:5 M to 0.18 D:30 M mg kg(-1). Analgesia was evaluated using the tail-flick test at time 0 (before injection), 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 minutes.

RESULTS

Midazolam at all doses administered (5-50 mg kg(-1)) did not significantly change tail-flick latencies from baseline values whereas D showed clear dose-dependent increases in tail-flick latency for doses administered in the range of 0.03-0.18 mg kg(-1). Tail-flick latencies in rats administered D+M combinations were significantly greater than D alone (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A dose-related analgesic effect was demonstrated for D in the rat, which was enhanced by co-administration of M.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The combination of D+M administered IP to rats at doses of 0.12:20 and 0.09:15 mg kg(-1) was shown to be a good combination to provide sedation/analgesia with a duration of action greater than 60 minutes. The onset of sedation was rapid (1-3 minutes), and onset of profound analgesia was reached within 5-10 minutes.

Effects of ketamine on acute somatic nociception in wild-type and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor ɛ1 subunit knockout mice

Although the properties of ketamine appear to be well characterized, there is a lot of ambiguity in the literature regarding its analgesic effects. After careful selection of proper experimental conditions and drug doses, we systematically characterized the effects of systemic ketamine on acute somatic nociception in mice and examined the role of the NMDA receptor epsilon1 subunit in mediating its analgesia. Intraperitoneal administration of ketamine was not analgesic in any of the phasic pain assays (thermal, mechanical, electrical) applied to C57BL/6 (wild-type) and NMDA receptor epsilon1 subunit knockout (mutant) mice. Surprisingly, rather than being analgesic for thermal nociception, ketamine showed pronociceptive properties in case of low-intensity heat stimulation in wild-type mice. In the formalin test (tonic pain), ketamine significantly reduced phase 2 nociceptive behavior in both wild-type and mutant mice. These data indicate that in wild-type mice ketamine has no analgesic effect on phasic pain in normal somatic tissues, but alleviates tonic pain after inflammation. Such analgesic spectrum of ketamine can be fully explained by its NMDA receptor antagonist properties. The results for the mutant mice suggest that the epsilon1 subunit of the NMDA receptor does not mediate the analgesic effects of ketamine in tonic pain.