Assessment of stress levels in girls with central precocious puberty before and during long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment: a pilot study

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs treatment in girls with central precocious puberty and early fast puberty

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is the standard treatment for children with central precocious puberty (CPP). We assessed efficacy and safety of GnRHa treatment in girls with CPP and early fast puberty (EFP).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included anthropometric, clinical and laboratory data retrieved from medical files of girls with CPP or EFP, treated with GnRHa and followed at a tertiary endocrine clinic during 2007-2021.

RESULTS

For both CPP (n = 144) and EFP (n = 231) groups, mean height-SDS at GnRHa initiation and termination and at the last follow-up visit was greater than mid-parental height-SDS (P < 0.001). Only among girls with EFP, mean BMI-SDS was higher at treatment termination than initiation (P = 0.025). Median ages at menarche of the CPP and EFP groups were 11.8 and 12.0 years. Menstrual irregularities were reported in 20.3% of girls with CPP and in 18.7% of those with EFP. Adverse effects to treatment were reported in 3.5% and 3.9% of girls with CPP and EFP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, GnRHa treatment in girls with EFP was effective without significant adverse effects as in those with CPP. A randomized controlled trial is required to examine the psychological impact of GnRHa treatment of variant early puberty.

IMPACT STATEMENT

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is the standard treatment for central precocious puberty (CPP). We assessed efficacy and safety of GnRHa treatment in girls with early fast puberty (EFP), characterized by pubertal signs between ages 8-9 years with fast pubertal signs advancement and accelerated growth and bone maturation and in girls with CPP. We found in this large cohort that GnRHa treatment in girls with EFP was effective and safe as in those with CPP. A prospective randomized controlled trial is required to examine the psychological impact of GnRHa treatment of variant early puberty.

2022 Clinical practice guidelines for central precocious puberty of Korean children and adolescents

The Committee of Central Precocious Puberty of Korean Pediatrics and Adolescents of the Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology has newly developed evidence-based 2022 clinical practice guidelines for central precocious puberty in Korean children and adolescents. These guidelines provide the grade of recommendations, which includes both the strength of recommendations and the level of evidence. In the absence of sufficient evidence, recommendations are based on expert opinion. These guidelines have been revised and supplement the previous guidelines "Clinical Guidelines for Precocious Puberty 2011," and are drawn from a comprehensive review of the latest domestic and international research and the grade of recommendation appropriate to the domestic situation. This review summarizes the newly revised guidelines into 8 key questions and 27 recommendations and consists of 4 sections: screening, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term outcome of central precocious puberty.

Management of Growth Disorders in Puberty: GH, GnRHa, and Aromatase Inhibitors: A Clinical Review

Pubertal children with significant growth retardation represent a considerable therapeutic challenge. In growth hormone (GH) deficiency, and in those without identifiable pathologies (idiopathic short stature), the impact of using GH is significantly hindered by the relentless tempo of bone age acceleration caused by sex steroids, limiting time available for growth. Estrogen principally modulates epiphyseal fusion in females and males. GH production rates and growth velocity more than double during puberty, and high-dose GH use has shown dose-dependent increases in linear growth, but also can raise insulin-like growth factor I concentrations supraphysiologically, and increase treatment costs. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHas) suppress physiologic puberty, and when used in combination with GH can meaningfully increase height potential in males and females while rendering adolescents temporarily hypogonadal at a critical time in development. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) block androgen to estrogen conversion, slowing down growth plate fusion, while allowing normal virilization in males and stimulating longitudinal bone growth via androgen receptor effects on the growth plate. Here, we review the physiology of pubertal growth, estrogen and androgen action on the epiphyses, and the therapeutic impact of GH, alone and in combination with GnRHa and with AIs. The pharmacology of potent oral AIs, and pivotal work on their efficacy and safety in children is also reviewed. Time-limited use of AIs is a viable alternative to promote growth in pubertal males, particularly combined with GH. Use of targeted growth-promoting therapies in adolescence must consider the impact of sex steroids on growth plate fusion, and treatment should be individualized.

Psychological aspects of pre-adolescents or adolescents with precocious puberty: A systematic review

PROBLEM

Precocious puberty (PP) is an illness that appears when puberty, begins some years earlier than usual, provoking inferences in preadolescents and adolescents and their families. Therefore, the aim is to analyze if psychological consequences can be observed in groups of preadolescents or adolescents with PP.

METHOD

A bibliographic search of the scientific literature was made following the PRISMA guide in the following databases: ProQuest, Psychinfo, Web Of Science, and Scopus. 592 studies were found, were uploaded to Covidence to make a screening, of which finally 6 were included for the revision according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent evaluators made the search, selection, data extraction and quality evaluation of studies independently. The agreement degree between both was excellent in all of the cases.

RESULTS

211 preadolescents participated in total in all studies, of which 99 were preadolescents with PP, with a mean age of 8,94 years old. Studies evaluated so heterogeneous variables, such as psychopathology, self-image, neuropsychological and cognitive variables, and reasons to delay or stop PP. The quality of studies was moderated especially due to the low quality of the studies design, which were mostly transversal, and the representativity of the sample, being selected by convenience.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

More research is needed to evaluate the psychological consequences of the PP diagnosis in pediatrics, and its protection factors, because none of the studies approached this question. We consider that it is necessary to increment the quality of these studies, and that these take a biopsychosocial perspective.

Evaluation of the resilience of the girls with central precocious puberty treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the resilience of girls with central precocious puberty (CPP) during treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and compare these results with their healthy peers.

METHODS

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a self-report scale used to quantify resilience, which is divided into seven subgroups (hardiness, coping, flexibility, purpose, optimism, regulation of emotion and cognition (REC), and self-efficacy). Fifty-one girls with CPP receiving GnRHa treatment and 51 healthy controls were involved in the study. Anthropometric measurements were evaluated and CD-RISC was performed at least six months after the initiation of GnRHa treatment.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the anthropometric evaluations of girls with CPP and the control group. Similarly, the total score and subgroup scores of patients with CPP and the control group showed no statistically significant difference. In the correlation analysis, there was a weak negative correlation between height and flexibility (r=-0.314 p=0.025), height SDS and flexibility (r=-0.254 p=0.092), height SDS, and purpose (r=-0.285 p=0.058). Also, there was a weak negative correlation between REC and weight (r=-0.435 p=0.003), REC and weight SDS (r=-0.461 p=0.002), REC and height (r=-0.269 p=0.077), REC and height SDS (r=-0.322 p=0.033), REC and BMI (r=-0.289 p=0.058), and REC and BMI SDS (r=-0.353 p=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The resilience of girls with CPP treated with GnRHa was found to be similar to their healthy peers. The early diagnosis of the disease and adequate treatment may decrease the discrepancy of somatic changes between girls with CPP and their peers, which may help them to overcome the stress of CPP and long-term treatment.

The Assessment of Brain Volume Differences in Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty Girls; Comparison of Age-Matched Girls and Normal Puberty Girls

Objective: Although there have been several studies on the neuroanatomical changes in idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP), the association between each brain region and ICPP has not yet been clearly elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the difference in brain structure in ICPP compared with age-matched healthy controls and normal puberty controls, and additionally the correlation between brain volume difference and the luteinizing hormone (LH). Materials and Methods: The study enrolled fifteen girls with ICPP, as well as 15 age-matched healthy girls and 15 normal puberty girls as controls. The subjects underwent a 1.5 Tesla Avanto MR Scanner. Anatomical T1-weighted images were acquired with a T1 spin-echo sequence. The volumes of total and regional brain were compared with each of the two control groups and analyzed through the paired T-test, and the brain region related to the peak LH level was also analyzed through a simple correlation test. Results: The mean age of the ICPP group, age-matched group, and puberty group were 8.0 ± 0.9 years, 7.8 ± 0.9 years, and 11.9 ± 0.9 years, respectively. In our findings, the regional cerebral volumes in ICPP were different from age-matched controls. Compared with controls, ICPP showed a significant increase in gray matter (GM) volumes (the medial prefrontal cortex, superior parietal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, postcentral gyrus, superior occipital gyrus, cuneus, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, posterior cingulate gyrus (PCgG), cerebellar cortex (Cb)) and in white matter (WM) volumes (the insular, caudate, splenium of corpus callosum (p < 0.001)). Especially, the GM volumes of the PCgG (r = 0.57, p = 0.03) and Cb (r = 0.53, p = 0.04) were correlated positively with LH concentrations stimulated by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Compared to the normal puberty control, no significant difference in GM volume was found. Conclusions: This study showed the overall brain volumetric differences between ICPP girls and age-matched controls using voxel-based morphometric analysis, and further showed the correlation between brain volume and the sex hormone in ICPP. Through a comparison between the two groups, the cerebral development pattern of ICPP is similar to that of normal puberty, and these local differences in cerebral volume may affect social and congenital changes. These findings will be useful for understanding the neuroanatomical mechanisms on the specific morphological variations associated with ICPP.

Clinical findings influencing time to menarche post gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy in central precocious puberty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the time interval to menarche after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment in females with central precocious puberty (CPP) and to identify factors contributing to timing of menarche.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 39 females with CPP who reached menarche after GnRHa treatment (leuprolide or histrelin). CPP diagnostic criteria were breast development at &lt;8 years old, measurable pubertal luteinizing hormone and/or estradiol concentrations, and bone age advancement. Indications to treat were advanced bone age and psychosocial concerns. Descriptive summaries were reported as frequency and proportion for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous measures. Linear regression models were developed to evaluate the associations of clinical factors with the time interval to menarche.

RESULTS

Mean age was 9.4±1.6 years at treatment onset, and treatment duration was 2.2±1.4 years. Menarche occurred at 12.6±1.1 years, which was 1.04±0.5 years after treatment discontinuation. This was negatively associated with Tanner stage of breast development and bone age at treatment onset and change in bone age during treatment. No association was seen between time interval to menarche and treatment duration, medication, or body mass index.

CONCLUSION

We found the average time interval to menarche after GnRHa treatment in our population of female patients with CPP to be 1.04±0.5 years; this is in agreement with other reports. Tanner stage of breast development, bone age at treatment onset, and change in bone age were negatively associated with time interval to menarche. These data provide clinical correlates that assist providers during anticipatory guidance of patients with CPP after GnRHa treatment.

Precocious puberty

Precocious puberty (PP) is a common reason for referral to pediatric endocrinology clinics, with a strong female predominance. PP is a broad term encompassing benign variants of normal development, gonadotropin-dependent precious puberty (GDPP), and gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty (GIPP). This article reviews the definitions, physiology, clinical presentation, evaluation and treatment of these conditions.

Use of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs in Children: Update by an International Consortium

This update, written by authors designated by multiple pediatric endocrinology societies (see List of Participating Societies) from around the globe, concisely addresses topics related to changes in GnRHa usage in children and adolescents over the last decade. Topics related to the use of GnRHa in precocious puberty include diagnostic criteria, globally available formulations, considerations of benefit of treatment, monitoring of therapy, adverse events, and long-term outcome data. Additional sections review use in transgender individuals and other pediatric endocrine related conditions. Although there have been many significant changes in GnRHa usage, there is a definite paucity of evidence-based publications to support them. Therefore, this paper is explicitly not intended to evaluate what is recommended in terms of the best use of GnRHa, based on evidence and expert opinion, but rather to describe how these drugs are used, irrespective of any qualitative evaluation. Thus, this paper should be considered a narrative review on GnRHa utilization in precocious puberty and other clinical situations. These changes are reviewed not only to point out deficiencies in the literature but also to stimulate future studies and publications in this area.

Central precocious puberty in spina bifida children: Guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida

Children with spina bifida are at greater risk of developing central precocious puberty (CPP) compared to others. Therefore, early recognition and timely referral for further evaluation by a pediatric endocrinologist allows appropriate management that reduces the impact of CPP. This article discusses the diagnosis and management of CPP in children with spina bifida. This guideline was developed for SB Transition Healthcare Guidelines from the 2018 Spina Bifida Association's Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida.

Central precocious puberty, functional and tumor-related

Precocious puberty is defined as the appearance of secondary sex characteristics before 8 years of age in girls and before 9 years of age in boys. Central precocious puberty (CPP) is diagnosed when activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis is identified. It is a rare disease with a clear female predominance. A background of international adoption increases its risk, with other environmental factors such as endocrine disruptors also being associated with CPP. The causes of CPP are heterogeneous, with alterations of the CNS being of special interest. Physical injuries of the CNS are more frequent in boys, while idiopathic etiology is more prevalent among girls. However, in the last decade the number of idiopathic cases has diminished thanks to the discovery of mutations in different genes, including KISS1, KISS1R, MKRN3, and DLK1 that cause CPP. For the diagnosis of CPP, hormone studies are needed in addition to the clinical data regarding signs of pubertal onset. For this purpose, the GnRH test continues to be the gold standard. Imaging analyses, such as bone age and brain MRI, are also very useful. Furthermore, genetic testing must be incorporated in the diagnosis of CPP, especially in familial cases. Early puberty has been related to various consequences in the medium and long term such as behavioral problems, breast cancer, obesity, and metabolic comorbidities. However, there are few studies that have exclusively analyzed patients with CPP. GnRH analogs are the most frequent treatment election with the main objective being to improve adult height. Currently, there are new formulations that are being investigated.

Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty

Long-acting analogs of GnRH (GnRHas) have been the gold-standard treatment of central precocious puberty (CPP) worldwide and have an enviable track record of safety and efficacy. Recent years have witnessed much growth in the availability of longer-acting and sustained-release forms of GnRHas. Although all available agents appear promising, limited long-term follow-up and/or comparative data are available. In this review, important issues pertaining to the treatment of children with CPP are discussed. In addition to an assessment of the newer extended-release GnRHa formulations, a delineation of factors essential in determining which children should be treated is offered. Outstanding uncertainties in clinical management are highlighted and areas in need of future research identified. Literature searches for this review were performed in PubMed and OVID, with a focus on English-language publications using the terms "central precocious puberty" and "treatment."