Growth hormone treatment in irradiated children with brain tumors

Long-Term Safety of Growth Hormone Deficiency Treatment in Cancer and Sellar Tumors Adult Survivors: Is There a Role of GH Therapy on the Neoplastic Risk?

Experimental studies support the hypothesis that GH/IGF-1 status may influence neoplastic tissue growth. Epidemiological studies suggest a link between GH/IGF-1 status and cancer risk. However, several studies regarding GH replacement safety in childhood cancer survivors do not show a prevalence excess of de novo cancers, and several reports on children and adults treated with GH have not shown an increase in observed cancer risk in these patients. The aim of this review is to provide an at-a-glance overview and the state of the art of long-term effects of GH replacement on neoplastic risk in adults with growth hormone deficiency who have survived cancer and sellar tumors.

Hypothalamic-Pituitary and Other Endocrine Surveillance Among Childhood Cancer Survivors

Endocrine disorders in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancers are associated with substantial adverse physical and psychosocial effects. To improve appropriate and timely endocrine screening and referral to a specialist, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG) aims to develop evidence and expert consensus-based guidelines for healthcare providers that harmonize recommendations for surveillance of endocrine disorders in CAYA cancer survivors. Existing IGHG surveillance recommendations for premature ovarian insufficiency, gonadotoxicity in males, fertility preservation, and thyroid cancer are summarized. For hypothalamic-pituitary (HP) dysfunction, new surveillance recommendations were formulated by a guideline panel consisting of 42 interdisciplinary international experts. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE (through PubMed) for clinically relevant questions concerning HP dysfunction. Literature was screened for eligibility. Recommendations were formulated by drawing conclusions from quality assessment of all evidence, considering the potential benefits of early detection and appropriate management. Healthcare providers should be aware that CAYA cancer survivors have an increased risk for endocrine disorders, including HP dysfunction. Regular surveillance with clinical history, anthropomorphic measures, physical examination, and laboratory measurements is recommended in at-risk survivors. When endocrine disorders are suspected, healthcare providers should proceed with timely referrals to specialized services. These international evidence-based recommendations for surveillance of endocrine disorders in CAYA cancer survivors inform healthcare providers and highlight the need for long-term endocrine follow-up care in subgroups of survivors and elucidate opportunities for further research.

Safety of growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH deficient children and adults treated for cancer and non-malignant intracranial tumors-a review of research and clinical practice

Individuals surviving cancer and brain tumors may experience growth hormone (GH) deficiency as a result of tumor growth, surgical resection and/or radiotherapy involving the hypothalamic-pituitary region. Given the pro-mitogenic and anti-apoptotic properties of GH and insulin-like growth factor-I, the safety of GH replacement in this population has raised hypothetical safety concerns that have been debated for decades. Data from multicenter studies with extended follow-up have generally not found significant associations between GH replacement and cancer recurrence or mortality from cancer among childhood cancer survivors. Potential associations with secondary neoplasms, especially solid tumors, have been reported, although this risk appears to decline with longer follow-up. Data from survivors of pediatric or adult cancers who are treated with GH during adulthood are scarce, and the risk versus benefit profile of GH replacement of this population remains unclear. Studies pertaining to the safety of GH replacement in individuals treated for nonmalignant brain tumors, including craniopharyngioma and non-functioning pituitary adenoma, have generally been reassuring with regards to the risk of tumor recurrence. The present review offers a summary of the most current medical literature regarding GH treatment of patients who have survived cancer and brain tumors, with the emphasis on areas where active research is required and where consensus on clinical practice is lacking.

Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Aspects of Growth Hormone Deficiency During the Transition Period: Review of the Literature

The role of growth hormone (GH) during childhood and adulthood is well established. Once final stature is reached, GH continues to act during the transition, the period between adolescence and adulthood in which most somatic and psychological development is obtained. The achievement of peak bone mass represents the most relevant aspect of GH action during the transition period; however, equally clear is its influence on body composition and metabolic profile and, probably, in the achievement of a complete gonadal and sexual maturation. Despite this, there are still some aspects that often make clinical practice difficult and uncertain, in particular in evaluating a possible persistence of GH deficiency once final stature has been reached. It is also essential to identify which subjects should undergo re-testing and, possibly, replacement therapy, and the definition of unambiguous criteria for therapeutic success. Moreover, even during the transition phase, the relationship between GH substitution therapy and cancer survival is of considerable interest. In view of the above, the aim of this paper is to clarify these relevant issues through a detailed analysis of the literature, with particular attention to the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Response to GH Treatment After Radiation Therapy Depends on Location of Irradiation

OBJECTIVES

Cancer survivors with GH deficiency (GHD) receive GH therapy (GHT) after 1+ year observation to ensure stable tumor status/resolution.

HYPOTHESIS

Radiation therapy (RT) to brain, spine, or extremities alters growth response to GHT.

AIM

Identify differences in growth response to GHT according to type/location of RT.

METHODS

The Pfizer International Growth Database was searched for cancer survivors on GHT for ≥5 years. Patient data, grouped by tumor type, were analyzed for therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, RT of the focal central nervous system, cranial, craniospinal, or total body irradiation [TBI] as part of bone marrow transplantation), sex, peak stimulated GH, age at GHT start, and duration from RT to GHT start. Kruskal-Wallis test and quantile regression modeling were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1149 GHD survivors on GHT for ≥5 years (male 733; median age 8.4 years; GH peak 2.8 ng/mL), 431 had craniopharyngioma (251, cranial RT), 224 medulloblastoma (craniospinal RT), 134 leukemia (72 TBI), and 360 other tumors. Median age differed by tumor group (P < 0.001). Five-year delta height SD score (SDS) (5-year ∆HtSDS; median [10th-90th percentile]) was greatest for craniopharyngioma, 1.6 (0.3-3.0); for medulloblastoma, 5-year ∆HtSDS 0.9 (0.0-1.9); for leukemia 5-year ∆HtSDS, after TBI (0.3, 0-0.7) versus without RT (0.5, 0-0.9), direct comparison P < 0.001. Adverse events included 40 treatment-related, but none unexpected.

CONCLUSIONS

TBI for leukemia had significant impact on growth response to GHT. Medulloblastoma survivors had intermediate GHT response, whereas craniopharyngioma cranial RT did not alter GHT response. Both craniospinal and epiphyseal irradiation negatively affect growth response to GH therapy compared with only cranial RT or no RT.

GH deficiency in cancer survivors in the transition age: diagnosis and therapy

BACKGROUND

Survival rates among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) have significantly risen in the last 40 years due to substantial improvements in treatment protocols. However, this improvement has brought with it serious late effects that frequently involve the endocrine system. Of the endocrine disorders, GH deficiency (GHD) is the most common among CCSs as a consequence of a history of cancers, surgery, and/or radiotherapy involving the hypothalamo-pituitary region.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of English language articles regardless of age was conducted in the MEDLINE database between December 2018 and October 2019. We selected all studies on GH therapy in CCSs during the transition age regarding the most challenging topics: when to retest; which diagnostic tests and cut-offs to use; when to start GH replacement therapy (GHRT); what GH dose to use; safety; quality of life, compliance and adherence to GHRT; interactions between GH and other hormonal replacement treatments.

RESULTS

In the present review, we provide an overview of the current clinical management of challenges in GHD in cancer survivors in the transition age.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocrine dysfunction among CCSs has a high prevalence in the transition age and increase with time. Many endocrine disorders, including GHD, are often not diagnosed or under-diagnosed, probably due to the lack of specialized centers for the long-term follow-up. Therefore, it is crucial that transition specialized clinics should be increased in terms of number and specific skills in order to manage endocrine disorders in adolescence, a delicate and complex period of life. A multidisciplinary approach, also including psychological counseling, is essential in the follow-up and management of these patients in order to minimize their disabilities and maximize their quality of life.

Final height in growth hormone-deficient childhood cancer survivors after growth hormone therapy

PURPOSE

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is the most prevalent hypothalamic-pituitary (HP) disorder found in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). The published studies assessing GHD in CCS concluded that recombinant human GH (rhGH) does not restore final height (FH) to that predicted from mid-parental height (MPH). Thus, wider analyses on final height outcomes after rhGH in CCS are needed.

METHODS

Retrospective study on final height (FH) in 87 CCS treated with rhGH. Patients were divided into: Group A (n =48) who underwent cranial radiotherapy or had non-irradiated tumours of HP area, and B (n =39) who were treated with craniospinal or total body irradiation (TBI). 19/87 patients with central precocious/early puberty also received GnRH analogues.

RESULTS

Height (HT) gain after 1 and 2 years of rhGH was 0.38 ± 0.35 SDS and 0.18 ± 0.30 SDS, respectively (P < 0.0001); mean FH was in the normal range (- 0.85 ± 1.34 SDS), though not significantly different from HT SDS at baseline. 67% overall failed to reach MPH especially in Group B (P < 0.0001). However, height loss (HT SDS-MPH SDS) at FH improved or remained stable compared to baseline in 26/45 patients (58%). On stepwise regression analysis, major determinants of FH were HT at baseline (P < 0.0001) and delay before start of rhGH (P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in FH when GnRHa was added to rhGH.

CONCLUSION

rhGH and GnRH analogues therapy, when indicated, though failing to induce catch-up growth, prevented further height loss leading to a FH within the normal range but still below MPH, this latter being statistically significant in children who received craniospinal and TBI.

GH Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

GH deficiency (GHD) is common among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) with history of tumors, surgery, and/or radiotherapy involving the hypothalamus-pituitary region. We aimed to evaluate the effects of GH therapy (GHT) in CCSs on adult height, risk of diabetes mellitus, abnormal lipids, metabolic syndrome, quality of life, secondary tumors, and disease recurrence.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for randomized and observational studies. Pairs of reviewers independently selected studies and collected data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool outcomes across the studies.

RESULTS

We included 29 observational studies at moderate to high risk of bias. Sixteen studies compared CCSs on GHT with those not on GHT (512 patients, GH dose: 0.3 to 0.9 IU/kg/week). GHT was significantly associated with height gain [standard deviation score, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.13] and was not significantly associated with the occurrence of secondary tumors [odds ratio (OR), 1.10; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.67] or tumor recurrence (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.02). Thirteen studies compared CCSs on GHT with normal age- or sex-matched controls or controls with idiopathic GHD or short stature. GHT was associated with either improved or unchanged risk of diabetes, lipid profiles, and metabolic syndrome. GHT was associated with improvements in quality of life.

CONCLUSION

CCSs treated with GHT gain height compared with the untreated controls. GHT may improve lipid profiles and quality of life and does not appear to increase the risk of diabetes or the development of secondary tumors, although close monitoring for such complications remains warranted due to uncertainty in the current evidence.

Recurrence of brain tumours in patients treated with growth hormone: analysis of KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database)

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH) has been used successfully in the treatment of short stature secondary to GH deficiency in survivors of childhood brain tumours. There has been concern that GH might increase the risk of recurrence.

AIM

To analyse KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) with respect to tumour recurrence in patients with brain tumours.

METHODS

Data for tumour recurrence were analysed retrospectively in 1038 patients with craniopharyngiomas, 655 with medulloblastomas, 113 with ependymomas, 297 with germinomas, and 400 with astrocytomas or gliomas. All patients had received recombinant human GH (Genotropin, Pfizer Inc.).

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival rates were 63% at a follow-up of 10.3 y in craniopharyngioma, 69% in 9.1 y in the glial tumours, 71% in 7.4 y in germinomas, 92% in 4.6 y in medulloblastomas and 89% in 2.5 y in ependymomas. Dose of GH and treatment modalities did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Tumour recurrence rates in surviving patients with brain tumours receiving GH treatment do not appear to be increased compared with published reports. However, longer follow-up regarding recurrences and secondary neoplasms remains essential.

Characteristics of growth hormone therapy for pediatric patients with brain tumors in the National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) and from a survey of pediatric endocrinologists

Pediatric patients with brain tumors may have significant short stature secondary to growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This occurs as a result of impaired hypothalamic function due to tumor location, radiation therapy, surgery, or chemotherapy. The use of GH replacement therapy in this patient population is variable and somewhat unpredictable. We analyzed patient data from the National Co-operative Growth Study (NCGS) database and a survey completed by 19 members of the Pediatric Endocrine Alliance for Neuro Oncology Patients (PEANOP) to identify patterns of GH use in pediatric patients following treatment for brain tumors. From the NCGS database, we present demographic, dosing, and safety data. The PEANOP survey was examined to determine the percentage of patients receiving GH and the likelihood of treating these patients with GH following tumor treatment. The time to initiating GH replacement therapy was evaluated in 14 tumor types, as well as the contributing impact of the extent of tumor resection.

Growth response, pubertal growth and final height in Greek children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency on long-term GH therapy and factors affecting outcome

The growth data of 156 children (100 boys, 56 girls) with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), treated with human growth hormone (GH) for 5.7+/-3.7 years, from 1970-1997, were retrospectively analyzed to assess the efficacy of GH treatment and the factors involved. 62.2% of the studied population had idiopathic GHD (IGHD) and 35.2% had organic GHD (OGHD). At initiation of treatment, chronological age (CA) was 10.1+/-4.0 years in children with IGHD and 9.7+/-4.0 years in those with OGHD, while bone age (BA) was 7.0+/-3.7 and 7.7+/-3.2 years, respectively. The SDS of the growth velocity during the first year of therapy (GV1) was negatively related to CA at start of therapy (r = -0.53, p = 0.01). 109 children have reached final height (FH): 67 boys (FH = 165.3+/-6.3 cm) and 42 girls (FH = 153.9+/-5.4 cm). FH SDS was not significantly different from target height (TH) SDS. In the total group, FH SDS was positively related to height SDS for CA and BA at start of therapy (p = 0.01, p = 0.001, respectively), to TH SDS (r = 0.40, p = 0.001), and to GV1 (r = 0.33, p = 0.001). TH SDS was not different between the IGHD and OGHD groups (-1.02+/-0.8 vs. -0.94+/-6.9). The height gain at puberty did not differ between the groups with induced or spontaneous puberty in boys (23.7+/-8.6 vs. 25.4+/-6.9, not significant), while in girls it was higher in the group with spontaneous puberty (12.7+/-7.3 vs. 20.0+/-9.0, p = 0.008). The age and height at start of puberty was higher in girls and boys with induced puberty. In the total group, the FH SDS of children with induced puberty was higher in comparison with those with spontaneous puberty (-1.0+/-0.8 vs. -1.7+/-0.9, p = 0.001) and it was positively related to the height at start of puberty. When the two sexes were analyzed separately, the difference reached significance only in boys. In conclusion, children with GHD on GH treatment achieved a final height which was comparable to their genetic potential. The FH of children with OGHD was not different from those with IGHD. The age and height at start of puberty were the most significant determining factors for FH. Hence, a better FH might be expected by delaying or arresting puberty.