Low-dose intravenous pamidronate reduces fractures in childhood osteoporosis

A practical guide to the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in childhood and adolescence

Osteoporosis in childhood distinguishes itself from adulthood in four important ways: 1) challenges in distinguishing otherwise healthy children who have experienced fractures due to non-accidental injury or misfortunate during sports and play from those with an underlying bone fragility condition; 2) a preponderance of monogenic "early onset" osteoporotic conditions that unveil themselves during the pediatric years; 3) the unique potential, in those with residual growth and transient bone health threats, to reclaim bone density, structure, and strength without bone-targeted therapy; and 4) the need to benchmark bone health metrics to constantly evolving "normal targets", given the changes in bone size, shape, and metabolism that take place from birth through late adolescence. On this background, the pediatric osteoporosis field has evolved considerably over the last few decades, giving rise to a deeper understanding of the discrete genes implicated in childhood-onset osteoporosis, the natural history of bone fragility in the chronic illness setting and associated risk factors, effective diagnostic and monitoring pathways in different disease contexts, the importance of timely identification of candidates for osteoporosis treatment, and the benefits of early (during growth) rather than late (post-epiphyseal fusion) treatment. While there has been considerable progress, a number of unmet needs remain, the most urgent of which is to move beyond the monotherapeutic anti-resorptive landscape to the study and application of anabolic agents that are anticipated to not only improve bone mineral density but also increase long bone cross-sectional diameter (periosteal circumference). The purpose of this review is to provide a practical guide to the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in children presenting to the clinic with fragility fractures, one that serves as a step-by-step "how to" reference for clinicians in their routine clinical journey. The article also provides a sightline to the future, emphasizing the clinical scenarios with the most urgent need for an expanded toolbox of effective osteoporosis agents in childhood.

Drug Treatment of Low Bone Mass and Other Bone Conditions in Pediatric Patients

Osteoporosis may affect young individuals, albeit infrequently. In childhood, bone mass increases, reaching its peak between the second and third decades; then, after a period of stability, it gradually declines. Several conditions, including genetic disorders, chronic diseases, and some medications, can have an impact on bone homeostasis. Diagnosis in young patients is based on the criteria defined by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), published in 2013. High risk factors should be identified and monitored. Often simple interventions aimed to eliminate the underlying cause, to minimize the negative bone effects linked to drugs, or to increase calcium and vitamin D intake can protect bone mass. However, in selected cases, pharmacological treatment should be considered. Bisphosphonates remain the main therapeutic agent for children with significant skeletal fragility and are also useful in a large number of other bone conditions. Denosumab, an anti-RANKL antibody, could become a potential alternative treatment. Clinical trials to evaluate the long-term effects and safety of denosumab in children are ongoing.

The management of osteoporosis in children

This article reviews the manifestations and risk factors associated with osteoporosis in childhood, the definition of osteoporosis and recommendations for monitoring and prevention. As well, this article discusses when a child should be considered a candidate for osteoporosis therapy, which agents should be prescribed, duration of therapy and side effects. There has been significant progress in our understanding of risk factors and the natural history of osteoporosis in children over the past number of years. This knowledge has fostered the development of logical approaches to the diagnosis, monitoring, and optimal timing of osteoporosis intervention in this setting. Current management strategies are predicated upon monitoring at-risk children to identify and then treat earlier rather than later signs of osteoporosis in those with limited potential for spontaneous recovery. On the other hand, trials addressing the prevention of the first-ever fracture are still needed for children who have both a high likelihood of developing fractures and less potential for recovery. This review focuses on the evidence that shapes the current approach to diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of osteoporosis in childhood, with emphasis on the key pediatric-specific biological principles that are pivotal to the overall approach and on the main questions with which clinicians struggle on a daily basis. The scope of this article is to review the manifestations of and risk factors for primary and secondary osteoporosis in children, to discuss the definition of pediatric osteoporosis, and to summarize recommendations for monitoring and prevention of bone fragility. As well, this article reviews when a child is a candidate for osteoporosis therapy, which agents and doses should be prescribed, the duration of therapy, how the response to therapy is adjudicated, and the short- and long-term side effects. With this information, the bone health clinician will be poised to diagnose osteoporosis in children and to identify when children need osteoporosis therapy and the clinical outcomes that gauge efficacy and safety of treatment.

Efficacy of pamidronate in pediatric osteosarcoma patients with low bone mineral density

PURPOSE

Most surviving pediatric osteosarcoma patients experience osteoporosis, bone pain, and pathologic fracture during and after therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of pamidronate therapy in these patients.

METHODS

Nine osteosarcoma patients (12.8±1.6 years of age; 5 boys and 4 girls) who had a history of nontraumatic fracture or severe pain after completing chemotherapy were included. Intravenous pamidronate (1.5 mg/kg) was given every 6 weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Clinical outcomes including acute side effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS

After pamidronate treatments, all patients experienced decreased pain. Seven of 9 patients could walk without a crutch. The BMD of lumbar spine was increased by 0.108±0.062 mg/cm(2) after 8.4±1.0 months (n=8, P=0.017) and the mean z-score improved from -2.14±0.94 to -1.76±0.95 (P=0.161). Six patients (67%) had an acute-phase reaction, and 2 patients had symptomatic hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSION

Pamidronate appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of osteosarcoma in children with low BMD and bone pain.

Pain care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa: best care practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a group of rare disorders that have multi-system effects and patients present with a number of both acute and chronic pain care needs. Effects on quality of life are substantial. Pain and itching are burdensome daily problems. Experience with, and knowledge of, the best pain and itch care for these patients is minimal. Evidence-based best care practice guidelines are needed to establish a base of knowledge and practice for practitioners of many disciplines to improve the quality of life for both adult and pediatric patients with EB.

METHODS

The process was begun at the request of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association International (DEBRA International), an organization dedicated to improvement of care, research and dissemination of knowledge for EB patients worldwide. An international panel of experts in pain and palliative care who have extensive experience caring for patients with EB was assembled. Literature was reviewed and systematically evaluated. For areas of care without direct evidence, clinically relevant literature was assessed, and rounds of consensus building were conducted. The process involved a face-to-face consensus meeting that involved a family representative and methodologist, as well as the panel of clinical experts. During development, EB family input was obtained and the document was reviewed by a wide variety of experts representing several disciplines related to the care of patients with EB.

RESULTS

The first evidence-based care guidelines for the care of pain in EB were produced. The guidelines are clinically relevant for care of patients of all subtypes and ages, and apply to practitioners of all disciplines involved in the care of patients with EB. When the evidence suggests that the diagnosis or treatment of painful conditions differs between adults and children, it will be so noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based care guidelines are a means of standardizing optimal care for EB patients, whose disease is often times horrific in its effects on quality of life, and whose care is resource-intensive and difficult. The guideline development process also highlighted areas for research in order to improve further the evidence base for future care.

Treatment of osteoporosis in children with glucocorticoid-treated diseases

Glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis (GIO) is the most frequent form of drug induced osteoporosis. Glucocorticoids affect osteoblastogenesis, osteoclastogenesis and promote the apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes. A decrease of bone mineral density has been described in several pediatric diseases that require glucocorticoids, both as long-term replacement therapy, such as Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, and as treatment of acute phase or relapses, such as asthma, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus, organ transplantation and Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome. The increasing number of children with GIO and at risk of fractures reflects the complex nature of this condition, and the need of development of anti-osteoporotic drugs. In this review, we focus on the mechanisms of GIO in some pediatric diseases and on treatment of osteoporosis. We also report data on new signaling pathways as potential targets for future anti-osteoporotic drugs.

A survey of steroid-related osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention and treatment practices of pediatric rheumatologists in North America

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study is to assess practices of North American pediatric rheumatologists regarding monitoring, prevention, and treatment of low bone mineral density (BMD) in children on long-term glucocorticoid treatment. Long-term glucocorticoid therapy is associated with accelerated bone loss. Children with JIA and lupus have low baseline BMD and incident vertebral fractures commonly occur in these groups of patients even after a relatively short period of time being on systemic glucocorticoids. There are no established guidelines for identification, prevention, and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss in children.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 199 physicians who were listed in the ACR database as practicing pediatric rheumatology in North America.

RESULTS

86 physicians (43%) responded; 87% were board-certified in pediatric rheumatology. 95% used dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as their primary modality for assessing BMD. 79% "rarely" or "never" obtained a baseline BMD measurement prior to initiation of glucocorticoid therapy. 42% of respondents followed BMD annually. 93% "frequently" or "always" prescribed calcium for patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy; 81% "frequently" or "always" prescribed vitamin D. In patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, 35%-50 % of the practitioners "sometimes", "frequently" or "always" prescribed bisphosphonates. Bisphosphonates are prescribed at similar rates for male and female patients, and slightly more frequently for pubertal than for pre-pubertal patients. 96% of respondents "rarely" or "never" prescribed calcitonin for patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy; 92% "rarely" or "never" prescribe this medication for patients with known osteopenia or osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of DXA in children on long-term corticosteroid therapy varies greatly among North American pediatric rheumatologists. Most respondents do not screen for low BMD on a regular basis despite acknowledging the risks of bone loss in this population. Broad consensus appears to be present among practitioners favoring the prescription of calcium and vitamin D for patients receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy. Relatively few respondents consistently recommend bisphosphonate therapy, even for patients with known low bone density; calcitonin is rarely used. These data underscore the need for studies to acquire specific data on bone loss, and its prevention and treatment in young patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy.

The use of bisphosphonates in children: review of the literature and guidelines for dental management

Bisphosphonates are inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption with therapeutic benefit in a variety of bone disorders in both adults and children. While these agents have been routinely used in adults for the past three decades, their more recent introduction into paediatric medicine means there is a paucity of data on long-term safety and effects on dental development. There is uncertainty regarding the dental management of children treated with bisphosphonates, particularly when invasive dental procedures, such as extractions and oral surgical procedures, are required. There are limited data with which to make recommendations about the dental management of patients treated with bisphosphonates, and there are no published recommendations that specifically address paediatric patients. This paper aims to outline paediatric uses and adverse effects of bisphosphonates and present recommendations on the dental management of children receiving bisphosphonates.

Fracture after bisphosphonate treatment in children with cerebral palsy: the role of stress risers

BACKGROUND

In the nonambulatory cerebral palsy (CP) population with a prior history of fracture, the use of pamidronate is not always effective in preventing further fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that when fractures occur after cyclic pamidronate, they will be at the proximal or distal end of a pamidronate band.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of our CP patient database revealed 53 children who had received one or more complete courses of pamidronate therapy (five cycles over 12 months). Medical records were screened to identify children who had sustained a fracture or fractures after completing treatment.

RESULTS

Of 53 patients treated with pamidronate, only 14 sustained fractures after treatment. Radiographs were available for 11 patients, showing 19 fractures. Sixty-three percent of these fractures were located at a junction with pamidronate bands but not within the bands.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose stress risers as the mechanism for fractures that have occurred where bone mineral density abruptly changes as a result of cyclic administration of pamidronate. We show a theoretical example of how alternative dosing might reduce the ratio and therefore decrease the chance of formation of a stress riser.

Approach to the child with fractures

Evaluation of the child with fractures is challenging, as no clear guidelines exist to distinguish traumatic from pathological fractures. Although most fractures in childhood are benign, recurrent fractures may be associated with a wide variety of primary skeletal diseases as well as secondary causes, necessitating a careful history and physical exam to guide the evaluation. There is no "gold standard" for the evaluation and treatment of children with fractures and low bone mineral density (BMD); therefore, the diagnosis of osteoporosis in a pediatric patient should be made using a combination of clinical and radiographic features. Interpretation of bone densitometry in growing patients presents a unique set of challenges because areal BMD measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry depends on multiple dynamic variables. Interpretation of pediatric dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry should be based on Z-scores (sd scores compared to age, sex, and ethnicity-matched controls), using normative databases specific to the brand of densitometer and the patient population. Given the skeleton's ability to recover from low BMD through modeling and remodeling, optimizing management of underlying conditions leading to bone fragility is the initial step. Conservative measures including calcium and vitamin D supplementation and weight-bearing physical activity are important interventions that should not be overlooked. The use of bisphosphonates in children and adolescents is controversial due to lack of long-term efficacy and safety data and should be limited to clinical trials and compassionate therapy in children with significantly compromised quality of life. Close monitoring is required, and further study is necessary to assess their long-term safety and efficacy in children.

Treatment of symptomatic osteoporosis in children: a comparison of two pamidronate dosage regimens

Bisphosphonate treatment for bone fragility has expanded beyond children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) to those with other causes of low bone mass. However, clinical efficacy and optimal dosing in non-OI patients has not been established. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of patients with non-OI-related bone fragility to describe the effects of two different pamidronate treatment regimens on the bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture rate of these children. Between 2000 and 2009, 15 non-OI patients aged 8-16 years received pamidronate 1 mg/kg intravenously for 1 day every 3 months (4 mg/kg/year) or 1 mg/kg/day for 3 days every 4 months (9 mg/kg/year). After 1 year of pamidronate, the two groups had a comparable increase in adjusted BMD and reduction in fragility fractures. No serious adverse effects were observed. Since the long-term effects of bisphosphonate are unknown, large trials are needed to delineate the minimal effective dose in these patients.

Clinical review 1: Bisphosphonate use in childhood osteoporosis

CONTEXT

As awareness of osteoporosis in childhood has increased, so have pressures to consider use of the pharmacological agents used to treat osteoporosis in adults. This review examines available research on the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate therapy for pediatric osteoporosis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed the medical literature for key articles and consensus statements on the use of bisphosphonates in children through June 2008.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We compared reports using varying bisphosphonate agents, doses, and duration of therapy to treat osteogenesis imperfecta and a variety of secondary causes of osteoporosis in children. Conclusions drawn from a recently published Cochrane analysis and the consensus statements from experts in the field were considered as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of bisphosphonate therapy in pediatric patients remains controversial because of inadequate long-term efficacy and safety data. For this reason, many experts recommend limiting use of these agents to those children with recurrent extremity fractures, symptomatic vertebral collapse, and reduced bone mass. Current data are inadequate to support the use of bisphosphonates in children to treat reductions in bone mass/density alone. More research is needed to define appropriate indications for bisphosphonate therapy and the optimal agent, dose, and duration of use in pediatric patients.

Alendronate treatment promotes bone formation with a less anisotropic microstructure during intramembranous ossification in rats

There are safety concerns regarding administration of bisphosphonates to children. Little is known about the effects of bisphosphonates on bone matrix organization during bone modeling. The present study examined the effects of alendronate (ALN) on bone matrices formed by intramembranous ossification in the appendicular growing skeleton. ALN was administered to 1-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats at a dose of 0, 35, or 350 microg/kg/week for 4 or 8 weeks. The position of femoral diaphysis formed exclusively by intramembranous ossification was identified, and cross sections of cortical bone at this position were analyzed. Bone mineral density (BMD) and geometric parameters were evaluated using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The preferential orientation degree of biological apatite (BAp) crystals in the bone longitudinal direction, which shows the degree of bone matrix anisotropy, was evaluated using microbeam X-ray diffraction analysis. We analyzed bone histomorphometrical parameters and performed bone nanomechanical tests to examine the material properties of newly developing cortical bone. The preferential orientation degree of BAp crystals significantly decreased in 35 microg/kg/week ALN-treated groups compared with vehicle-treated groups, although there were no significant differences in BMD between the two groups. The periosteal mineral apposition rate significantly increased in the 35 microg/kg/week ALN-treated group. We found a high negative correlation between bone matrix anisotropy and the regional periosteal mineral apposition rate (r = -0.862, P < 0.001). Nanomechanical tests revealed that 35 microg/kg/week ALN administration caused deterioration of the material properties of the bone microstructure. These new findings suggest that alendronate affects bone matrix organization and promotes bone formation with a less anisotropic microstructure during intramembranous ossification.

Bisphosphonate therapy for children and adolescents with secondary osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Children with chronic illnesses are at increased risk for reductions in bone strength and subsequent fractures (osteoporosis), either due to the impact of the underlying condition on skeletal development or due to the osteotoxic effect of medications (e.g., glucocorticoids) used to treat the chronic illness. Bisphosphonates are being administered with increasing frequency to children with secondary osteoporosis; however, the efficacy and harm of these agents remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and harm of bisphosphonate therapy in the treatment and prevention of secondary osteoporosis in children and adolescents.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and ISI Web of Science (inception-December 2006). Further literature was identified through expert contact, key author searches, scanning reference lists of included studies, and contacting bisphosphonate manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, quasi-randomized, controlled clinical trials, cohort, and case controls of bisphosphonate(s) in children 0-18 years of age with at least one low-trauma fracture event or reductions in bone mineral density in the context of secondary osteoporosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality. Case series were used for supplemental harms-related data.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs, two CCTs, and one prospective cohort (n=281 children) were included and classified into osteoporosis due to: 1) neuromuscular conditions (one RCT) and 2) chronic illness (five RCTs, two CCTs, one cohort). Bisphosphonates examined were oral alendronate, clodronate, and intravenous (IV) pamidronate. Study quality varied. Harms data from 23 case series (n=241 children) were used. Heterogeneity precluded statistically combining the results. Percent change or Z-score change in lumbar spine areal BMD from baseline were consistently reported. Two studies carried out between-group analyses; one showed no significant difference (using oral alendronate in anorexia nervosa) while the other demonstrated a treatment effect on lumbar spine with IV pamidronate in burn patients. Frequently reported harms included the acute phase reaction, followed by gastrointestinal complaints, and bone/muscle pain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results justify further evaluation of bisphosphonates among children with secondary osteoporosis. However, the evidence does not support bisphosphonates as standard therapy. Short-term (3 years or less) bisphosphonate use appears to be well-tolerated. An accepted criterion for osteoporosis in children, a standardized approach to BMD reporting, and examining functional bone health outcomes (e.g., fracture rates) will allow for appropriate comparisons across studies.

Bisphosphonate therapy for reduced bone mineral density in children with chronic graft-versus-host disease

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) occurs frequently in children after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but therapy for this complication is undefined. To determine the impact of bisphosphonate therapy on reduced BMD after HCT, we compared baseline and follow-up dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans of 48 patients (controls) who received calcium and vitamin D to 18 patients who also received bisphosphonate therapy. Among the controls, median annualized increase in standardized BMD (sBMD) was 10% (range, -26% to +41%), but the deviation of sBMD from normal, as indicated by the Z-score, did not improve from baseline, -2.46 (range: -5.15 to -1.16) compared to follow-up, -2.79 (range: -5.76 to +0.07). For the bisphosphonate-treated patients, the median annualized increase in sBMD was 33% (range 3% to 147%, P = .0002) and the median Z-score improved from -3.57 (range: -5.13 to -0.86) at baseline, to -1.80 (-4.89 to +0.47) at follow-up (P = .06). The annualized median change in BMD Z-scores per year was +0.12 (-2.28 to +4.24) among the controls and +1.43 (-0.29 to +3.72) for the bisphosphonate group (P = .0002). The greatest improvement in BMD was observed in children who received therapy with bisphosphonates.

Consensus and Controversy Regarding Osteoporosis in the Pediatric Population

OBJECTIVE

To review current consensus and controversy surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in childhood and adolescence.

METHODS

The medical literature was reviewed with emphasis on the importance of early skeletal health, risk factors for bone fragility, and the diagnosis and management of children at risk for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Childhood and adolescence are critical periods for optimizing bone growth and mineral accrual. Bone strength is determined by bone size, geometry, quality, and mass-variables that are influenced by genetic factors, activity, nutrition, and hormones. For children with genetic skeletal disorders or chronic disease, bone growth and mineral accrual may be compromised, increasing the lifetime risk of osteoporosis. The goal for the clinician is to identify children at greatest risk for future fragility fracture. Bone densitometry and turnover markers are challenging to interpret in children. Prevention and treatment of bone fragility in children are less well established than in adults. Optimizing nutrition and activity may not restore bone health, but the drug armamentarium is limited. Sex steroid replacement has not proven effective in restoring bone mass in patients with anorexia nervosa or exercise-associated amenorrhea. Bisphosphonates can increase bone mass and may reduce bone pain and fractures, most convincingly in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Further studies are needed to establish the safety, efficacy, and optimal drug, duration, and dosage in pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Bone health during the first 2 decades contributes to the lifetime risk of osteoporosis. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in childhood.

Systematic review of effectiveness of bisphosphonates in treatment of low bone mineral density and fragility fractures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

AIMS

To evaluate the currently available evidence for the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in children with low bone mineral density (BMD) and fragility fractures associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and the safety of bisphosphonates in JIA and other conditions.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched using a structured search strategy. The effectiveness review included any studies of children with JIA treated with bisphosphonates. The safety review also included studies of osteogenesis imperfecta. Quantitative data analysis was not undertaken because of the heterogeneity of the studies; findings were summarised using tables and narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Ninety four studies were identified. Sixteen studies (78 JIA children) were included in the effectiveness review: one randomised controlled trial, three controlled cohort studies, 11 case series, and one case report. At baseline, children had low BMD below the expected values for age and sex matched children. In all studies, treatment with bisphosphonates increased BMD compared with baseline: the mean percentage increase in spine BMD ranged from 4.5% to 19.1%. Overall, studies were heterogeneous and of variable quality. A total of 59 papers were included in the safety review; treatment durations were up to three years. The most common side effect was a flu-like reaction with intravenous treatment. This occurred during the first infusion and was transient; the symptoms were managed with paracetamol and did not occur during subsequent cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates are a promising treatment for low BMD and fragility fractures in children with JIA. However, the quality of the current evidence is variable and better studies are needed to more clearly assess their role.

Pamidronate treatment of pediatric fracture patients on chronic steroid therapy

Pediatric nephrology and rheumatology patients with steroid-induced osteopenia are at risk of skeletal fracture. Bisphosphonate therapy has not been routinely advocated as a primary or secondary intervention for steroid-associated fractures in this population. This case control study evaluates the role of pamidronate therapy as a secondary fracture intervention. Children with symptomatic pathological fractures of the axial spine or ribs were treated with pamidronate 1 mg/kg/dose (n=17) IV at 60-day intervals for 1 yr (n=15) or 2 yr (n=2). Bone mineral density of L1-L4 (BMD) was assessed prior to treatment and at six-month intervals, and compared to 17 disease-age-gender-steroid dose-matched control patients. Alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphate, PTH, renal biochemistry, and 24-hr urine collections for CrCl, N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio, phosphate excretion, and calcium excretion were obtained every two months in the pamidronate population. Pamidronate caused a first exposure transient flu-like illness lasting <24 h in three patients and one patient had a new pathological fracture. No adverse events of hypocalcemia, allergic reaction or thrombophlebitis were noted. All patients reported improvement of skeletal pain. Despite ongoing steroid treatment, pamidronate significantly increased L1-L4 BMD Z-scores (mean+/-SE) relative to baseline (pamidronate vs control: 0-6 months: 0.27+/-0.14 vs -0.82+/-0.31; 0-12 months: 0.63+/-0.17 vs -0.46+/-0.27; 0-18 months: 0.55+/-0.32 vs 0.17+/-0.27; 0-24 months: 0.15+/-0.21 vs -0.23+/-0.22; 0-30 or 36 months: 0.77+/-0.71 vs -0.68+/-0.25) with repeated measures ANOVA assessment (F=11.27, p=0.0057). This study supports the safety and efficacy of pamidronate in steroid-induced fractures in pediatric nephrology and rheumatology patients.