Clinical and pharmacological experience with LJP-394

Nanoparticle-mediated Delivery of IL-2 To T Follicular Helper Cells Protects BDF1 Mice from Lupus-like Disease

We recently reported that poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) loaded with interleukin (IL)-2 and targeted to T cells inhibited the development of lupus-like disease in BDF1 mice by inducing functional T regulatory cells (Tregs). Here we show that the protection from disease and the extended survival of BDF1 mice provided by IL-2-loaded NPs targeted to T cells is not only due to an induction of Tregs but also contributed by an inhibition of T follicular helper (T_FH) cells. These results identify a dual protective activity of IL-2 in the control of lupus autoimmunity, namely the inhibition of effector T_FH cells, in addition to the previously known induction of Tregs. This newly recognized activity of IL-2 delivered by NPs can help better explain the beneficial effects of low-dose IL-2 immunotherapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and might be considered as a new strategy to slow disease progression and improve outcomes in lupus patients.

LJP 1082: a toleragen for Hughes syndrome

A hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and related autoimmune diseases such as the antiphospholipid syndrome (APL or Hughes syndrome) is an apparent breakdown in tolerance, the process by which the body distinguishes self from nonself in order to maintain a versatile immune defense while protecting itself from self-annihilation. To some extent, loss of tolerance is a desirable feature of host immunity, and is known to occur in healthy individuals. Optimal tolerance then is probably not an all or nothing phenomenon. Autoimmunity should be seen as a breakdown in homeostasis rather than a completely aberrant kind of immunity. This leads to special considerations in the assessment of potentially toleragenic therapies, in which an attempt is made to re-educate the immune system. LJP 1082 is designed as a polyvalent antigenic structure aimed at crosslinking specific surface immunoglobulin and tolerizing B cells to beta2-glycoprotein I. Issues of antigenic selection and multiplex forces influencing tolerance and immunity may have impact on its optimal development and use in patients.

LJP 394 (abetimus sodium, Riquent) in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

LJP 394 (abetimus, Riquent, La Jolla Pharmaceuticals) is four oligonucleotide B cell toleragen which acts as an 'anti-anti DNA'. Given as a weekly infusion, Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies with this biologic on close to 1,000 patients have demonstrated no toxicity of any note. In patients with lupus nephritis and an elevated anti-DNA (Farr assay) who have a high affinity to LJP 394, the drug significantly decreases anti-DNA, improves quality of life, and trends towards reducing renal flares. LJP 394 is a promising induction and/or maintenance therapy for lupus patients with elevated anti-DNA and active disease.

Therapeutic Potential of Toleragens in the Management of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Autoantibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) are believed to be the primary cause of coagulation abnormalities in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Clinical features include a range of life-threatening thrombotic events and microangiopathies affecting multiple organ systems. Current standard of care relies on long-term, high-intensity anticoagulation and is associated with a high risk for serious bleeding events. The relation between autoantibodies and the pathophysiology of APS is not clearly understood, but numerous in vitro studies have characterized the effects of antiphospholipid autoantibodies on various components of the coagulation cascade, including tissue factor and the protein C pathway. The fine specificity of autoantibodies to beta2GPI is a subject of considerable debate; however, a body of evidence may offer resolution by integrating concepts of antibody affinity and assay sensitivity with carefully designed molecular studies. An investigational new therapy for APS is based on the approach that pathogenic antibodies may be reduced via depletion of circulating autoantibodies and induction of immune tolerance at the B-cell level. Preliminary results from a phase I/II clinical trial with LJP 1082, a B-cell toleragen, indicate the drug was well tolerated and may warrant further development for reduction of thrombotic events in patients with APS.

Novel Approaches to Therapy for SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease manifested by multi-organ involvement and elevated titers of anti-DNA antibodies. Current therapies for SLE are broadspectrum, and include steroids and immunosuppressive cytotoxic agents that are counterbalanced by the toxicity and side effects of the medications. One of the goals is to target therapies by altering specific known mechanisms of inflammation and autoimmunity. Although the inciting antigen is still unknown in SLE, it may be possible to alter the regulation of the immune response by targeted molecular therapy. Methods under investigation, which may be beneficial, are manipulation of second-signal stimulation of the immune response (anti-CD40L), manipulation of cytokines (monoclonal anti-IL-10), inducing tolerance by administration of blocking peptides (LJP394), and the manipulation of idiotypes (IVIg). In this article, we also discuss modalities that are steroid-sparing (MTX), and selective immunosuppression (stem-cell restoration and MMF). We review the ongoing literature from 2000-2002, utilizing the MEDLINE search. Controlled trials, open trials, and trials in phase I and II have been included, and anecdotal reports were excluded. The major advances have been with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and LJP 394.

Lowering anti-dsDNA antibodies--what's new?

Antibodies to dsDNA are specific to SLE and are pathogenic, both due to their ability to deposit in tissues through a variety of mechanisms, and to their ability, when present in immune complexes, to activate inflammatory cells. The relationship of serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels to disease activity is a complex one and the factors that determine whether or not such antibodies will be pathogenic in an individual SLE patient are incompletely understood. Although anti-dsDNA antibodies can be made by naïve B cells and B cells belonging to the B1 and marginal zone subsets, pathogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies have the hallmarks of germinal center development and exposure to T cell help, including accumulation of somatic mutations and class switching to the IgG isotype. Epitope spreading may result in aquisition of cross-reactivities with multiple target organ antigens and aquisition of a memory phenotype will allow these B cells to acquire antigen presentation functions that amplify the autoreactive response. In the early stages of disease, or after remission induction protocols, autoreactive B cells may be susceptible to treatments that target T cell costimulation or that deplete or tolerize naïve and mature B cells. Therapeutic approaches targeting innate immune responses or regulatory T cells are starting to be tested in pre-clinical models. In later disease stages, memory and plasma cell accumulation may render patients more resistant to this type of therapeutic approach. Deposition of anti-dsDNA antibodies in target tissues can stimulate an inflammatory cascade that leads to tissue damage. A number of murine models have now been developed that show that interruption of this cascade can prevent or reverse such damage. This type of approach may be beneficial for individuals with established disease. As we learn more about the specific defects that cause SLE, it may become possible to individualize therapy based on patient specific biologic markers.

Newer drugs for the treatment of lupus nephritis

This article first reviews the current treatment of lupus nephritis, with a focus on the most serious forms, that is, the proliferative subtypes. Current standards for treatment have been developed empirically. Corticosteroids form the basis of all regimens. Cyclophosphamide given intravenously for prolonged periods is the current gold standard. Azathioprine can be regarded as an effective drug for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis. Studies on its efficacy in schedules for remission induction are in progress. It has been learned from studies on 'conventional' immunosuppression that randomised, clinical trials should comprise large numbers of patients and a follow-up of many years to elucidate differences between effective strategies. These requirements are not met by any of the 'new' treatments we discuss in this review. There is only limited experience in patients with lupus nephritis with drugs that are currently used for immunosuppression in other autoimmune diseases, such as methotrexate, cyclosporin and high-dose intravenous gammaglobulins, nor with new immunosuppressive drugs that have been developed for immunosuppression in organ transplantation (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, fludarabine and cladribine). Hormonal therapy with the weak androgen prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA) has no role in treatment of active lupus nephritis. There are interesting experiences with agents that have evolved from progress in immunobiology and in our understanding of immunological processes. These modalities enable more specific immunosuppression and include monoclonal antibodies directed at immune cells, cytokines and components of the complement system, constructs developed to induce tolerance in pathogenic B cells, and gene therapy. Finally, we review data on autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. We conclude that some strategies (like mycophenolate mofetil) are good candidates for further investigation in large-scale, prospective, randomised trials with prolonged follow-up (which are almost by definition hard to perform). Most new biological agents still are in a pre-clinical phase.

New therapies: plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and monoclonal antibodies

Rheumatologic emergencies may pose a serious threat to life, and the treatment of patients with these illnesses continues to be challenging. In the last decade extensive animal and human research has led to development of new therapies. Considerable progress has been made in the therapy for RA. Newly developed biologic therapies have shown promising results in clinical studies, and two agents have already been approved by the FDA. These drugs are currently available for therapy and are under close postmarketing scrutiny to assess long-term efficacy and safety. Similar therapies are under investigation for SLE. Plasmapheresis, once used for many diseases, is now restricted mostly to conditions for which its use has been shown to be beneficial in randomized, controlled studies. Immunoadsorption is used to target specific disease-producing pathogens for removal during extracorporeal therapy. Evidence is accumulating for the use of IVIGs in several immune-mediated conditions. The outlook for some emergencies continues be grim, however, and various therapies are used based on evidence from anecdotal case reports and case series. The new therapies are relatively safe, but careful monitoring is needed, because there is potential for serious adverse events.

Treatment options for juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory chronic disease characterized by the presence of activated helper T-cells that induce a B-cell response, resulting in the secretion of pathogenic autoantibodies and the formation of immune complexes. SLE in children is a disease of low prevalence with a wide range of clinical manifestations, which means that the number of randomized controlled studies are few and usually involve a small number of patients. In recent years, new therapeutic agents have appeared and the role of older treatments has been clarified. Many of these treatments are designed to reduce inflammation. The spectrum is broad and ranges from traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to cytotoxic agents that have anti-inflammatory effects. The current treatment of children or adults depends on the clinical expression of the disease. Minor manifestations usually respond to the administration of NSAIDs, low doses of corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, or methotrexate. Thalidomide could be used for refractory skin lesions. Major manifestations can endanger the patient's life and require early, aggressive treatment. Kidney disease and other manifestations have been related to the formation or deposit of tissular immune complexes. Therefore, for years the main aim of treatment has been to suppress the immune response. The immunosuppressant treatments used in children with SLE include high doses of corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide. Several combinations of medications have been used to obtain a rapid remission or to reduce the risk of toxicity of prolonged administration of cytotoxic agents. Intravenous gamma-globulin has been successfully used in the treatment of lupus nephritis, vasculitis, and acute thrombocytopenia. In spite of numerous published studies, the use of these drugs is still controversial. The immunosuppression achieved with these treatments is nonspecific, not always effective, and associated with significant toxicities; the most significant being growth retardation, accelerated atherosclerosis and severe infectious complications. The purpose of new biological therapies is to achieve specific immunosuppression, which makes it possible to design more effective and less toxic therapeutic strategies. Mycophenolate mofetil is a promising alternative in patients who do not respond to high doses of cyclophosphamide or azathioprine. Some recently developed monoclonal antibodies such as anti-CD40L or anti-IL-10, or other molecules such as LJP394 may prove useful in the near future. Finally, stem cell transplantation may be proposed in patients with severe juvenile-onset SLE who do not respond to any treatment.

Management of lupus erythematosus: recent insights

This article reviews and cites only publications relating to the management of lupus that have appeared since 1999. The data in these publications demonstrate that preventive and proactive strategies are as important as medication in improving the quality of life and life span of the patient with lupus. The use of lasers and thalidomide represents major advances in cutaneous lupus. The first major study over 25 years using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to manage lupus suggests benefits. Further evidence was presented showing that dehydroepiandrosterone, leflunomide, and methotrexate are effective in treating mild to moderate disease. Various iterations and modifications of traditional cyclophosphamide therapy with or without mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and azathioprine continue to be studied for treating organ-threatening disease. Intravenous gamma globulin and selective apheresis are niche therapies appropriate in a few, highly selected patients. Immunoablative doses of cyclophosphamide appear to be as effective as stem cell transplantation for serious disease resistant to conventional doses of cyclophosphamide. Twelve biologic agents have been studied in lupus since 1999, with only LJP-394 showing clear-cut, convincing efficacy.

How to manage patients with lupus nephritis

The clinical and renal biopsy predictors of assistance in determining therapy are reviewed. While pulse cyclophosphamide remains the most effective treatment for proliferative nephritis, there is increasing interest in other agents, such as azathioprine, particularly to maintain remission. While lupus membranous nephropathy has attracted limited study, preliminary work suggests a role for cyclophosphamide. Newer therapies, including cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, immunoadsorption, intravenous immune globulin, LJP-394, high-dose immunoablation and nucleoside analogues require further study but offer hope for those failing conventional treatments.

New therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus

A new understanding of the pathogenesis of autoimmunity, the mechanisms of action of older drugs, the advent of target-specific biological therapies and pharmacogenomics has created multiple treatment options for the patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. These include topical therapies, more selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, hormonal interventions and a new generation of immune suppressives. Currently available strategies also include the use of intravenous gamma globulin, apheresis, stem-cell transplantation and antileprosy preparations alone or in combination with immune suppressives. A handful of biologicals have been studied in clinical trials. After two decades without new options for lupus patients practitioners now have a full menu of improved therapeutic options.