Treatment paradigms on hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

Relationship between serum quantitative HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in chronic hepatitis B patients

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level has been developed as an important marker to predict treatment outcome recent years. The authors aimed to identify the correlation between quantitative HBsAg and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and explore whether quantitative HBsAg can be used as a surrogate marker of serum HBV DNA for CHB patients. One hundred seventy-three patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive and negative patients. There was a positive correlation between quantitative HBsAg and HBV DNA level in HBeAg positive patients (r = 0.509, P < 0.001) and poor correlation in HBeAg negative patients (r = 0.176, P = 0.096). Interestingly, completely no correlation (r = -0.01, P = 0.994) was found in younger HBeAg negative patients (<40 years old), whereas in older HBeAg negative patients (>40 years old) there is a positive correlation (r = 0.448, P = 0.003). Mean HBsAg titer and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level were significantly higher in HBeAg positive group (3.81 log₁₀ IU/mL; 105 IU/mL) than in negative group (2.85 log₁₀  IU/mL; 32 IU/mL) (P <  0.001). We concluded that quantitative HBsAg could reflect HBV DNA level in HBeAg positive patients, but could not surrogate for HBV DNA level in HBeAg negative patients. Our study improves understanding of the relationship between HBsAg titers and HBV DNA levels in CHB patient and may have implications for future treatment algorithms evaluating the HBsAg titers in both HBeAg positive and negative patients.

A new model mimicking persistent HBV e antigen-negative infection using covalently closed circular DNA in immunocompetent mice

Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major health problem. HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-negative strains have become prevalent. Previously, no animal model mimicked the clinical course of HBeAg-negative HBV infection. To establish an HBeAg-negative HBV infection model, the 3.2-kb full-length genome of HBeAg-negative HBV was cloned from a clinical sample and then circularized to form covalently closed circular (cccDNA). The resulting cccDNA was introduced into the liver of C57BL/6J mice through hydrodynamic injection. Persistence of the HBeAg-negative infection was monitored at predetermined time points using HBV-specific markers including HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), HBeAg, and HBV core antigen (HBcAg) as well as DNA copies. Throughout the study, pAAV-HBV1.2 was used as a control. In mice injected with HBeAg-negative cccDNA, the HBV infection rate was 100% at the initial stage. HBsAg levels increased up to 1 week, at which point levels peaked and dropped quickly thereafter. In 60% of injected mice, HBsAg and HBcAg persisted for more than 10 weeks. High numbers of HBV DNA copies were detected in the serum and liver. Moreover, cccDNA persisted in the liver tissue of HBeAg-negative mice. In contrast to the pAAV-HBV 1.2 injected mice, no HBeAg was found in mice injected with HBeAg-negative HBV throughout the study period. These results demonstrate the first successful establishment of a model of HBeAg-negative HBV-persistent infection in immunocompetent mice. Compared to pAAV-HBV1.2-injected mice, the infection persistence and levels of serum virological and biochemical markers were approximately equal in the model mice. This model will be useful for mechanistic studies on HBeAg-negative HBV infection and will facilitate the evaluation of new antiviral drugs.

Virological and serological tools to optimize the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B

Molecular biology techniques are routinely used to diagnose and monitor treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). These tools can detect and quantify viral genomes and analyse their sequences to determine genotype. The increasing use of these tools to monitor patients has greatly improved the management of CHB infection by maximizing the potential for individualized treatment. HBV genotyping has become increasingly important and provides additional information to predict a response to therapy. More sensitive methods to determine HBV DNA levels are now available and the units of measurements have been standardized. HBsAg levels in serum have been shown to reflect active intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and to have additional value in treatment decisions, especially as an on-treatment marker.

HBsAg quantification to optimize treatment monitoring in chronic hepatitis B patients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in serum have been shown to reflect active intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and to have additional value as a marker of on-treatment efficacy. In the past few years, immunoassays to quantify HBsAg have been developed to monitor HBsAg kinetics during treatment. Although HBsAg quantification cannot replace HBV DNA measurement in clinical practice, the combined use of HBsAg quantification and HBV DNA measurements could help predict treatment outcome. One of the most important results of the studies in this new marker is that a decline in HBsAg titres during pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) treatment is a strong predictor of response so that a 'week 12 stopping rule' could be established for both Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) for a sustained viral response (SVR) remains low. The role of HBsAg measurements during nucloes(t)ides analogue (NAs) treatment is unclear. It may be a useful marker for stopping NAs by limiting the chance of relapse or for add-on strategies. Monitoring serum HBsAg levels in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients during treatment may provide significant complementary information to HBV DNA measurements.

Screening for serum biomarkers in patients with chronic hepatitis B with hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance, following pegylated interferon alpha therapy

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is one of the most common infectious disease worldwide and a leading cause of death. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has previously been proven to be a steady biomarker that may be used to predict clinical outcomes. The amount of circulating HBsAg has been reported to reflect the number of infected hepatocytes. An advantage of pegylated interferon alpha (peg-IFN-α) is that as a finite course of therapy, it can potentially lead to sustained disease remission in subsequent decades. HBsAg seroclearance can reportedly be achieved in some hepatitis B patients treated with peg-IFN-α; this is a major advantage of IFN-α, as compared with nucleoside analogue treatment. In the present study, a random phage display peptide library was used to screen for potential serum peptide biomarkers in predicting which patients with CHB would exhibit HBsAg seroclearance, following 48 weeks of peg-IFN-α therapy. A total of 30 patients with CHB who achieved HBsAg seroclearance following peg-IFN-α therapy and an additional 30 age-, gender-, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status- and hepatitis B virus genotype-matched patients with CHB without HBsAg seroclearance following peg-IFN-α therapy, were enrolled as a discovery cohort. In the discovery/screening phase, 17/20 of the randomly selected phage clones, exhibited a specific reaction with purified sera immunoglobulin G from the HBsAg clearance group, and 13/17 positive phage clones came from the same phage clone, with the inserted peptide sequence ETCRASCINESA (named IFNC1). In the validation phase, phage-ELISA results showed that the positive reaction rate of the IFNC1 peptide phage clone was 92.0% with the HBsAg seroclearance group (n=50), which was significantly higher, as compared with the randomly selected HBsAg non-clearance group (12.0%, n=50) and the healthy control group (8.0%, n=50). In conclusion, the newly identified mimic peptide IFNC1 showed a high predictive validity HBsAg seroclearance in patients with CHB, following peg-IFN-α therapy. Therefore IFNC1 may be a potential serum biomarker, which could be used to predict the treatment outcomes of peg-IFN-α therapy.

The natural course of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and its management

Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) runs a long natural course during which underlying changes in liver histology can progress to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, as well as to hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapeutic intervention is currently aiming at suppression of HBV replication by applying a number of pharmacological agents. For an optimum use of available therapies, good knowledge of the natural course of chronic infection, as well as of the role played by several viral, host, and environmental factors, is mandatory. The larger part of this chapter deals with how to treat the various subsets of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), using mainly three first-line drugs: pegylated interferon-α2a, entecavir, and tenofovir, administered either in finite courses or indefinitely. The frequency of virological, serological, biochemical, and histological responses in the various subsets of patients, both during and after stopping treatment, is reviewed. It is stressed that the application of the highly potent antivirals entecavir and tenofovir, with acceptable safety records and with a high barrier to HBV resistance, represents major progress in the treatment of CHB. Despite the hitherto important developments in the treatment of viral hepatitis B, clinical cure of chronic HBV infection with HBsAg loss is achievable only in a few treated patients while eradication of HBV infection appears unrealistic. Development of new pharmacological agents acting at multiple targets of the replicative cycle of HBV may achieve higher efficacy and even cure of CHB.

HBsAg quantification: useful for monitoring natural history and treatment outcome

The template of hepatitis B virus transcription, the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), plays a key role in the life cycle of the virus and permits the persistence of infection. It has been suggested that hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification reflects the concentration of cccDNA in the liver. In hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B, HBsAg levels are higherduring the immune tolerance phase than during the immune clearance phase. During the natural history of chronic hepatitis B, serum HBsAg declines progressively from the immune-tolerant to the low replicative phase. In HBeAg negative patients, the combination of low hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (<2000 IU/ml) and low HBsAg levels (<1000 IU/ml) can predict inactive carrier status, low risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, and the probability of HBsAg loss. HBsAg in combination with HBV DNA predicts the outcome of Peg-Interferon therapy: An absence of decline at week 12 is a good predictor of non-response and to stop therapy. Any decline at week 24, suggests that therapy should be continued to 48 weeks. Although the decrease in HBsAg decline slow with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, a rapid decline can predict future HBsAg seroclearance. A level <100 IU/ml during six consecutive months could be a marker of a sustained response after treatment cessation.

Restoration of albumin production by nucleoside analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B

The clinical course of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CH-B) was greatly changed by the introduction of nucleoside analogues. We often encounter patients where the serum level of albumin recovers quickly following the treatment. In this study, we focused carefully on the changes in serum albumin level noted during nucleoside analogue therapy, in an effort to clarify the mechanism behind the restoration of albumin production. We observed changes in serum albumin levels during nucleoside analogue therapy in 12 patients with CH-B and studied the mechanism behind the restoration of albumin production following the therapy. The serum level of albumin was significantly increased very soon after the treatment was started. Prior to treatment with nucleoside analogues, the albumin signal for mRNA was only slightly seen in the peri-portal area, whereas 12 months after the treatment, the liver tissue presented an obvious signal of albumin mRNA. Serum levels of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) were significantly decreased 12 months after the treatment. In this study, we demonstrated that nucleoside analogues decrease HGF through the suppression of hepatocyte damage, leading to the restoration of albumin production in patients with CH-B.

HBsAg quantification to predict natural history and treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis B patients

There is a growing interest in serum HBsAg quantification (qHbsAg). HBsAg titers are negatively correlated with liver fibrosis in HBeAg(+) patients. In HBeAg(-) HBsAg level <1000 IU/ml and HBV-DNA titer <2000 IU/ml accurately identify inactive carriers. During PEG-IFN treatment qHBsAg identifies patients with no benefit from therapy at week 12, allowing stopping or switched- "week 12 stopping rule". During nucleos(t)ide analogues the role of qHBsAg need to be clarified. In clinical practice qHBsAg is a simple and reproducible tool that may be used in association with HBV-DNA to classify patients during the natural history of HBV and to monitor therapy.

Hepatitis B viral factors and treatment responses in chronic hepatitis B

Baseline and on-treatment hepatitis B viral factors are reported to affect treatment responses. A lower baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level is a strong predictor of the response to antiviral therapy. HBV genotype A/B patients have better responses to interferon-based therapy than those with genotypes C/D. Regarding the association of HBV mutants with responses to antiviral therapy, current evidence is limited. On-treatment viral suppression is the most important predictor of response to nucleoside analogs. On-treatment hepatitis B surface antigen decline is significantly associated with response to pegylated interferon. In the future, individualized therapy should be based on treatment efficacy, adverse effects, baseline and on-treatment predictors of antiviral therapy.

The role of HBsAg quantification for monitoring natural history and treatment outcome

Since its discovery by Blumberg in 1965, the hepatitis B virus antigen (HBsAg) is used as the fingerprint of hepatitis B infection. The HBsAg level is a reflection of the transcriptional activity of cccDNA. It is an important marker that not only indicates active hepatitis B infection but can also predict clinical and treatment outcomes. Assays for HBsAg quantification are fully automated and have high output. HBsAg titres are higher in HBe antigen (HBeAg)(+) than in HBeAg(-) patients and are negatively correlated with liver fibrosis in HBeAg(+) patients. In HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B, an HBsAg level <1000 IU/ml and an HBV DNA titre <2000 IU/ml accurately identify inactive carriers. During PEG-IFN treatment, HBsAg quantification is used to identify patients who will not benefit from therapy as early as week 12 on therapy, so that treatment may be stopped or switched- 'week 12 stopping rule'. With nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA), the role of HBsAg quantification must be clarified. Several studies show that baseline and on-treatment HBsAg levels might identify patients that can be treated with no subsequent risk of reactivation. In clinical practice, HBsAg quantification is a simple and reproducible tool that can be used in association with HBV DNA to classify patients during the natural history of HBV and to monitor therapy.

Long-term follow-up of hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients treated with peginterferon α-2a: progressive decrease in hepatitis B surface antigen in responders

OBJECTIVE

Peginterferon (PEG-IFN) is considered as a first-line treatment option for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. We aimed to evaluate the long-term response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative patients.

METHODS

All patients enrolled in the PARC study who completed the treatment phase were eligible for this long-term follow-up (LTFU) study. Patients received PEG-IFN α-2a (180 μg weekly) ± ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 48 weeks and had at least one additional LTFU visit after the initial follow-up period of 24 weeks (mean duration 2.1 ± 0.2 years). Retreated patients were considered nonresponders.

RESULTS

Of 117 patients who completed the treatment phase, 79 (68%) were included in this LTFU study. Among 19 patients with a combined response at 24 weeks after treatment [initial responders; hepatitis B virus DNA<10 000 copies/ml (<1714 IU/ml) and normal alanine aminotransferase], 12 (63%) sustained this response through LTFU. Three additional patients showed such a response at LTFU, resulting in a total of 15 (19%) combined responders at LTFU. A marked decrease in the serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels was observed in initial responders, resulting in HBsAg clearance in 26% of the patients (6% of all LTFU participants).

CONCLUSION

About one-third of HBeAg-negative patients with a response to PEG-IFN at 24 weeks after treatment subsequently had a relapse during 2 years of follow-up. Despite the limited overall efficacy of PEG-IFN, patients responding to PEG-IFN treatment showed a marked decrease in serum HBsAg, resulting in a high rate of HBsAg clearance, which indicates the need for predictors of response to PEG-IFN in HBeAg-negative disease.

Validation of a stopping rule at week 12 using HBsAg and HBV DNA for HBeAg-negative patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It was recently demonstrated that none of the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients without any serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline and with <2log hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA decline at week 12 of a 48-week peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) treatment course achieved a sustained response (SR). We aimed at validating this stopping rule in two independent trials.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative patients receiving 48 or 96 weeks of PEG-IFN in the phase III registration trial (N=85) and PegBeLiver study (N=75) were stratified according to the presence of any HBsAg decline and/or 2log HBV DNA decline at week 12. SR was defined as HBV DNA <2000IU/ml and normal alanine aminotransferase 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

The original PARC trial included 102 patients (genotype A/D/other: 14/81/7), 25 (25%) had an SR. The validation dataset consisted of 160 patients (genotype A/B/C/D/other: 10/18/34/91/7), 57 (36%) achieved an SR. The stopping rule performed well across the two studies (p=0.001) and its negative predictive value [NPV] was 95% in the validation dataset harbouring genotypes A-D. Its performance was best for genotype D. Moreover, among the 34 patients treated for 96 weeks, none of the 7 (21%) without HBsAg decline and with <2log HBV DNA decline at week 12 achieved an SR (NPV 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed in two independent studies that the combination of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels at week 12 identifies HBeAg-negative patients with a very low chance of SR to either 48 or 96 weeks of PEG-IFN therapy.

Impact of hepatitis B e antigen-suppressing mutations on the replication efficiency of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus strains

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative hepatitis B commonly requires long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues aiming at persistently suppressing hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication to halt progression of liver disease and prevent complications. Entecavir (ETV) is widely used in HBeAg-negative hepatitis B, but distinct HBV polymerase mutations can confer resistance against ETV, in conjunction with lamivudine resistance. Precore (PC) and basal core promoter (BCP) mutations that underlie HBeAg-negativity enhance replication of lamivudine-resistant mutants. To comprehensively analyse the impact of PC or BCP mutations on viral replication of ETV-resistant HBV mutants, replication-competent HBV constructs were generated harbouring lamivudine resistance (rtM204V/rtL180M, rtM204I) plus ETV resistance (rtS202G, rtS202I or rtT184G) on wild-type (WT)-, PC- and BCP-backgrounds. Functional consequences on viral fitness and susceptibility to antivirals were assessed in vitro. The presence of any ETV resistance drastically reduced viral replication when compared to WT HBV. In rtS202G mutants (plus lamivudine resistance), addition of either PC or BCP mutations moderately enhanced the reduced replication, without reaching WT HBV levels. In rtS202I or rtT184G mutants, PC and BCP mutations did not significantly improve viral fitness. All ETV-resistant constructs, independently of PC or BCP mutations, showed resistance towards ETV and lamivudine, but remained susceptible to tenofovir. Our data demonstrate that HBeAg-suppressing PC or BCP mutations cannot restore the strongly reduced replicative capacity of ETV-resistant HBV mutants to WT level, although they moderately increase replication of rtS202G combination mutants. ETV resistance thereby differs from lamivudine resistance alone, corroborating that ETV is in short term a safe option for HBeAg-negative patients.

Recent advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

INTRODUCTION

At present, two strategies exist for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB): i) standard or pegylated interferon alpha (IFN) with mainly immune modulatory effects; and ii) nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) with direct antiviral effects. The optimal treatment for an individual patient remains controversial.

AREAS COVERED

The treatment efficacy and prediction of response to antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B are reviewed and discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The rates of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or seroconversion are continuously increasing in CHB patients after stopping a finite course of IFN, whereas long-term NA therapy is usually required to improve the adverse outcomes of CHB. Lower baseline HBV DNA level is a strong predictor for both sustained viral suppression and HBeAg seroconversion in patients receiving IFN-based as well as NAs therapy. In addition, HBeAg-positive patients with genotype A or B infection have better responses to IFN-based therapy than those with genotypes C or D infection. Furthermore, on-treatment predictors such as declines of serum HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBeAg levels may be helpful in making decisions of subsequent therapy. Regarding the association of host genetic factors with responses to antiviral therapy, current evidence is limited.

The Role of Interferon in Hepatitis B Therapy

Despite the introduction of new nucleos(t)ide analogues in recent years, peginterferon is still recommended as a potential first-line treatment option by current practice guidelines for the management of chronic hepatitis B. Peginterferon offers the advantage of higher sustained off-treatment response rates compared to nucleos(t)ide analogues because of its immunomodulatory effects. Sustained transition to the inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carrier state can be achieved in about 30% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients and 20% of HBeAg-negative patients. Recent studies have focused on identification of pretreatment and on-treatment factors that allow the selection of patients who are likely to achieve a sustained response to peginterferon therapy in order to avoid the side-effects and costs associated with unnecessary treatment. Future studies need to address whether specific virologic benchmarks can guide individualized decisions concerning therapy continuation and whether peginterferon combined with new potent nucleos(t)ide analogues improves treatment outcomes.

Characterization of hepatitis virus B isolated from a multi-drug refractory patient

Prolonged treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleoside analogues (NAs) almost invariably engenders viral resistance, and sequential NAs monotherapy can promote multi-drug resistance. This study aimed to investigate the molecular characteristics and the mutation profile of multi-drug resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). The complete genome of HBV isolated from a multi-drug refractory patient was amplified and cloned, and 22 clones were selected for sequencing. The homology of the full-length genome between clones ranged from 98.7% to 99.9%. A precore stop codon mutation of G1896A and basic core promoter (BCP) mutations A1762T/G1764A were detected in a majority of clones. A phylogenetic analysis showed that all clones were classified as subgenotype B2. Three mutations in the surface (S) antigen region, sC76Y, sP120T and sI195M, were detected in 100%, 100% and 77.3% of the clones, respectively. In the core (C) antigen region, a mutation at codon 135 (cP135Q) was detected in 100% of clones. Lamivudine (LAM)-resistant mutations, rtL180M and rtM204V/I were detected in 86.4% of clones. Adefovir (ADV) or entecavir (ETV)-resistant mutations were not detected. Several novel mutations, such as rtT128N, rtA222T, rtS256G, rtL271M, rtS332R, and rtN/T337D, were present in a majority of clones. Furthermore, six pairs of mutations in the overlapping reverse transcriptase (RT) gene and S gene were detected. In conclusion, the complex HBV mutation profile detected in the multi-drug refractory patient highlights the problems associated with the ongoing selection of mutations, including further compensatory mutations as well as potential cross-resistance mutations.

Hepatitis B virus kinetics under antiviral therapy sheds light on differences in hepatitis B e antigen positive and negative infections

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B infection has a presentation and clinical course that is divergent from that of HBeAg‐positive infection. The former usually presents with lower viral levels but faster progression to liver disease. We sought to better understand the balance between replication and the immune response against hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODS

Viral kinetics in 50 HBeAg‐negative patients under various treatment protocols with interferon α and/or nucleoside or nucleotide analogs was analyzed. HBV DNA level was measured frequently and the data fitted to a viral dynamic model. A meta‐analysis of all published studies of viral kinetics in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative infection was also conducted.

RESULTS

We found that the clearance of both HBV virions and infected cells was significantly faster in HBeAg‐negative infection than in HBeAg‐positive infection. In HBeAg‐negative infection, there was also a negative correlation between baseline HBV DNA levels and infected cell half‐life, suggesting that the higher the viral load the faster the turnover of infected cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reveal the dual role played by the immune response in maintaining lower viral levels and inducing faster turnover of infected cells, the latter of which may be responsible for the more aggressive nature of HBeAg‐negative infection.

Reactivation of hepatitis B

Reactivation of hepatitis B refers to the abrupt increase in hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in a patient with inactive or resolved hepatitis B. Reactivation can occur spontaneously, but more typically is triggered by immunosuppressive therapy of cancer, autoimmune disease, or organ transplantation. Reactivation can be transient and clinically silent, but often causes a flare of disease that can be severe resulting in acute hepatic failure. Most instances of reactivation resolve spontaneously, but if immune suppression is continued, re-establishment of chronic hepatitis occurs which can lead to progressive liver injury and cirrhosis. The best-described instances of reactivation occur in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers with inactive or minimally active disease who are given cancer chemotherapy for lymphoma or leukemia. Typically, serum HBV DNA rises during chemotherapy, followed by a disease flare and HBV DNA clearance with immune reconstitution after chemotherapy is stopped. Special forms of reactivation occur after solid organ and bone marrow transplantation in which chronic infection often results. Several randomized, placebo-controlled trials have shown that reactivation can be prevented by antiviral prophylaxis. Routine prophylaxis is therefore recommended for persons with HBsAg undergoing cancer chemotherapy or transplantation, but major questions remain. Which patients should be screened for HBsAg and should all be treated? Which antiviral should be used and for how long? Should persons with resolved hepatitis B without HBsAg receive prophylaxis? Future research should address the underlying molecular mechanisms of reactivation as well as its optimal means of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in different patient populations.

The rtA194T polymerase mutation impacts viral replication and susceptibility to tenofovir in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis B virus strains

Tenofovir is a new effective treatment option for patients with chronic hepatitis B, but could be potentially hampered by mutations in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase conferring drug resistance. Drug resistance may occur preferentially if long-term administration is required, for example, in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative HBV infection bearing precore (PC) and basal core promoter (BCP) mutations. The rtA194T polymerase mutation has been found in HBV/HIV coinfected patients during tenofovir treatment and may be associated with tenofovir resistance. We generated replication-competent HBV constructs harboring rtA194T alone or in addition to lamivudine (LAM) resistance (rt180M + rtM204V), PC mutations, and BCP mutations and assessed their replicative capacity after transient transfection in human hepatoma cells. The rtA194T polymerase mutation alone or in conjunction with LAM resistance reduced the replication efficiency as compared with wild-type (WT) HBV. In contrast, combination of rtA194T (+/- LAM resistance) with HBeAg-negative PC or BCP mutants increased the replication capacity of the drug-resistant polymerase mutants, thereby restoring the viral replication to similar levels as WT clones. Clones harboring rtA194T showed partial resistance to tenofovir in vitro and also to LAM but remained susceptible to telbivudine and entecavir.

CONCLUSION

The rtA194T polymerase mutation is associated with partial tenofovir drug resistance and negatively impacts replication competence of HBV constructs. Viral replication, however, can be restored to WT levels, if these polymerase mutations occur together with precore or basic core promoter substitutions as found in HBeAg-negative hepatitis B. Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection may therefore be at particular risk when developing drug resistance to tenofovir. Telbivudine or entecavir should be considered as effective alternative treatment options for these patients.

Adefovir combined with lamivudine in treatment of lamivudine-resistant patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis: an analysis of 14 cases

AIM: To observe the efficacy and safety of adefovir in combination with lamivudine in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

METHODS: Fourteen decompensated liver cirrhosis patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants, positive HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBcAb, and HBV DNA level >10⁸ copies/L were treated with lamivudine in combination with adefovir. The clinical efficacy after 6 mo and the adverse reaction during treatment were observed.

RESULTS: The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (Alb), and prothrombin activity (PTA) were improved distinctly after 6-mo combined treatment. The levels of serum ALT, AST and TBIL became normal in 57.1%, 42.8%, and 50.0% of patients, respectively. The percentages of patients with undetectable HBV DNA levels (<10⁵ copies/L), seropositive HBeAg and seroconversion were 50.0%, 28.4% and 7.1%, respectively. Ascites was retrogressed in those accompanied with ascites. There were no obvious renal toxicity and adverse reation. No adefovir-related HBV mutations were identified.

CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with lamivudine and adefovir is stable and safe for lamivudine-resistant patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

Current approaches for treating chronic hepatitis B: when to start, what to start with, and when to stop

The natural course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is variable, and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) disease exhibits itself through a spectrum of clinical manifestations. These factors contribute to the challenges faced when managing patients who live with HBV infection. Furthermore, conventional treatment options (e.g., interferon alfa-2a, lamivudine, and adefovir) are moderately effective and can be associated with problems, such as poor tolerability (interferon alfa-2a) and the development of drug resistance (lamivudine). Over the last 5 years, several antiviral agents including entecavir, peginterferon alfa-2a, and telbivudine which are more efficacious and have improved tolerability over previous drugs have become available. The availability of novel antiviral agents and advances in understanding resistance patterns of antiviral agents has resulted in refinement of CHB treatment recommendations and guidelines. More recently, evidence from clinical trials suggests the central importance of virologic suppression as an indicator of treatment outcome and the predictive value of on-treatment HBV DNA levels in response to antiviral therapy. This review highlights the goals of therapy and clinical experience with therapies that are newly licensed or in the late stages of clinical development. Current approaches for treating CHB and new strategies for optimizing response to therapy are also discussed.

Telbivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with oral nucleos(t)ide analogs is evolving rapidly with newer compounds gaining approval. Recently, the US FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) have approved telbivudine, a potent anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific agent with a hitherto excellent safety profile. This review focuses on the efficacy of this agent in chronic hepatitis B compared with lamivudine, evaluated clinically in Phase II and a large Phase III study. Monitoring of the virologic response under treatment with sensitive HBV-DNA assays has been applied, aiming at increasing efficacy and reducing HBV resistance. The results are critically presented and the evolving concept of effective long-term telbivudine and other nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, predicted by the extent of suppression of HBV replication at week 24, are analyzed and discussed.