The ROADMAP trial: olmesartan for the delay or prevention of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes

Diabetic Kidney Disease: An Update

Diabetes is a major public health challenge and diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a broader diagnostic term than diabetic nephropathy, is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease in the United States and worldwide. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of DKD, and recent clinical trials testing new therapeutic interventions, have shown promising results to curb this epidemic. Given the global health burden of DKD, it is extremely important to prioritize prevention, early recognition, referral, and aggressive management of DKD in the primary care setting.

Change in Proteinuria or Albuminuria as a Surrogate for Cardiovascular and Other Major Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing controversy around the surrogacy of proteinuria or albuminuria, particularly for cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, which remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to assess the surrogacy of changing proteinuria or albuminuria for CV events, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched (from inception to October 2017). All randomized controlled trials in adults that reported change in proteinuria or albuminuria and ≥ 10 CV, ESRD, or all-cause mortality events were included. We calculated treatment effect ratios (TERs), defined as the ratio of the treatment effect on a clinical outcome and the effect on the change in the surrogate outcome. TERs close to 1 indicate greater agreement between the clinical outcome and changing proteinuria or albuminuria.

RESULTS

Thirty-six trials were included in the meta-analysis. We observed inconsistent treatment effects for proteinuria and CV events (20 trials; TER 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.22]) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 51%, P = 0.005). Treatment effects on proteinuria or albuminuria were also inconsistent with the effects on all-cause mortality (21 trials; TER 1.17 [95% CI, 1.07-1.28]; I² = 35%, P for heterogeneity = 0.06), although they were similar with the effects on ESRD (23 trials; TER 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.13]; I² = 9%, P for heterogeneity = 0.337).

CONCLUSIONS

Change in proteinuria or albuminuria might be a suitable surrogate outcome for ESRD. However, overall treatment effects on these potential surrogates are inconsistent and overestimate the treatment effects on CV events and all-cause mortality.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality compared to angiotensin receptor blockers: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background There are few reviews comparing the long-term outcomes of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in a hypertensive population because both are effective in reducing blood pressure. None of them compared angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers with a placebo group in patients with essential hypertension, because few studies exist with this design. Methods A systematic search of PUBMED, LILACS, SCIELO, ICTRP, Cochrane, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2000 until 31 December 2015 selected prospective studies that reported an association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in the following cardiovascular outcomes: heart failure/hospitalisation, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, total cardiovascular deaths, total deaths and total outcomes. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined by using a fixed-effects model. Results Seventeen studies ( n = 73,761) were included of which 12 studies were randomly assigned to angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy ( n = 24,697) and five to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors ( n = 12,170). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors proved to be significant in reducing total deaths (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93) and cardiovascular deaths (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.87). Angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy did not show a reduction in total deaths (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09) or cardiovascular deaths (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.06). For acute myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure/hospitalisation, the reductions were significant for both classes. Conclusion Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker use is similar in preventing major cardiovascular outcomes regarding acute myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure/hospitalisation. However, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is more effective in reducing total deaths and cardiovascular deaths than angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Aberrant activation of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system in the developing kidneys of type 2 diabetic rats

We have previously reported that intrarenal angiotensin II (Ang II) levels are increased long before diabetes becomes apparent in obese Otsuka-Long-Evans-Tokushima-Fatty (OLETF) rats, a model of type 2 diabetes. In this study, we examined the changes in intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity in the developing kidneys of OLETF rats. Ang II contents and mRNA levels of RAS components were measured in male OLETF and control Long-Evans Tokushima (LETO) rats at postnatal days (PND) 1, 5, and 15, and at 4-30 weeks of age. In both LETO and OLETF rats, kidney Ang II levels peaked at PND 1, then decreased during the pre- and post-weaning periods. However, Ang II levels and gene expression of RAS components, including angiotensinogen (AGT), renin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), were not significantly different between LETO and OLETF rats. Intrarenal Ang IIcontents further decreased during puberty (from 7 to 11 weeks of age) in LETO rats, bur not in OLETF rats. At 11 weeks of age, kidney Ang II levels, urinary AGT excretion, and mRNA levels of AGT and renin were higher in OLETF rats than in LETO rats, while blood glucose levels were not significantly different between these groups of rats. These data indicate that continued intrarenal expression of Ang II during pubescence contributes to the increases in intrarenal Ang II levels in prediabetic OLETF rats, and is associated with increased intrarenal AGT and renin expression. Inappropriate activation of the intrarenal RAS in the prediabetic stage may facilitate the onset and development of diabetic nephropathy in later life.

Integrated control of hypertension by olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide and rationale for combination

Hypertension affects nearly one-third of all individuals in the US, yet one-half of all treated patients achieve blood pressure (BP) controlled to recommended goals. The percentage of patients with uncontrolled BP is likely to be much higher when considering the number of patients who are not even aware of their hypertensive state. Elevated BP is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events and end-organ damage. Antihypertensive monotherapy is not always sufficient to achieve BP goals, and thus more aggressive treatment regimens need to be considered. Antihypertensive combination therapy, which may improve tolerability, offers the benefit of targeting different mechanisms of action. Numerous outcomes studies support the use of a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor as a first-line choice in antihypertensive therapy. This review discusses the benefits of combination therapy with the angiotensin type II receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil (OM) paired with the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The pharmacokinetic properties of OM will be reviewed in addition to efficacy studies that support OM + HCTZ combination therapy over other possible antihypertensive combinations. Finally, a rationale for choosing HCTZ over another diuretic, chlorthalidone, will also be discussed based on pharmacokinetic differences, clinical concerns, and trends in use.