Current clinical evidence for the use of mesenchymal stem cells in articular cartilage repair

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation in the treatment of autoimmune and rheumatic immune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in the treatment of autoimmune and rheumatic immune diseases through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Two researchers conducted a comprehensive search of Chinese and English databases from their inception until Dec. 2023. The literature screening and data extraction were then performed. Statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 42 relevant RCTs, involving 2,183 participants, were ultimately included in this study. These RCTs encompassed four types of rheumatic immune and bone diseases, namely rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthritis, systemic sclerosis arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, primary Sjögren's syndrome (PSS). The systematic review indicates that MSC transplantation may improve spondyloarthritis, RA, PSS. The meta-analysis reveals that MSC transplantation significantly improved symptoms in patients with OA [VAS (visual analogue scale): bone marrow: SMD = - 0.95, 95% CI - 1.55 to - 0.36, P = 0.002; umbilical cord: SMD = - 1.25, 95% CI - 2.04 to - 0.46, P = 0.002; adipose tissue: SMD = -1.26, 95% CI -1.99 to - 0.52, P = 0.0009)], SLE [Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI): SMD = - 2.32, 95% CI - 3.59 to - 1.06, P = 0.0003], inflammatory bowel disease [clinical efficacy: RR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.67, P < 0.00001]. However, MSC transplantation may not improve the symptoms of multiple sclerosis and systemic sclerosis (Ssc). Importantly, MSC transplantation did not increase the incidence of adverse events (OA: RR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.65, P = 0.15; SLE: RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.51, P = 0.76; Inflammatory bowel disease: RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.22, P = 0.96; Multiple sclerosis: RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.53, P = 0.50), supporting its safety profile across the included studies. These findings suggest that MSC transplantation holds promise for several rheumatic and autoimmune diseases while highlighting areas where further research is warranted.

CONCLUSION

MSC transplantation may have the potential to treat autoimmune and rheumatic immune diseases. Moreover. MSC transplantation appears to be relatively safe and could be considered as a viable alternative treatment option for autoimmune and rheumatic immune diseases.

Management of hip osteoarthritis: harnessing the potential of mesenchymal stem cells-a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating condition, necessitating effective and safe treatment options. This systematic review aims to explore the potential of intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) infiltrations as a therapeutic approach for hip OA.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, encompassing PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria involved studies focusing on intra-articular MSC injections in patients with hip OA and reporting pain relief as an outcome measure. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and methodological index for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the review, exhibiting varied designs and sample sizes (316 patients). Outcome measures consisted of cartilage repair assessed through MRI and radiographies, pain scores (WOMAC, VAS, NRS), and functional improvements (HOS-ADL, OHS, FRI, PDQQ, LEFS). The studies reported favorable improvements in functional scores, pain relief, and cartilage repair/radiographic findings, with minimal reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular MSC infiltrations demonstrate promise as an effective and safe therapeutic intervention for managing hip OA, offering pain relief and functional enhancements. Nevertheless, limited high-quality studies and outcome measure variations underscore the need for further research to establish definitive treatment guidelines. Future investigations should address optimal MSC utilization, long-term outcomes, and potential complications to ensure the success of MSC-based therapies for hip OA management, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The findings provide valuable insights into the potential of MSC-based treatments for hip OA, advocating further rigorous research in this field.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023436973).

Chondral regeneration in femoroacetabular lesions is favoured using peripheral blood stem cells with hyaluronan-based scaffold and micro-drilling: A prospective cohort study

Purpose

To determine whether intra-articular injections of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with hyaluronan (HA)-based scaffold improve articular cartilage regeneration in chondral injuries caused by mixed-femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) over a period longer than 24 months post-hip arthroscopy.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, patients with mixed-FAIS and chondral injury ≥ IIIB according to the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society grade or III/IV of Konan/Haddad classification underwent intra-articular injection of PBSC with an HA-based scaffold and micro-drillings during hip arthroscopy. The degree of chondral repair was measured at baseline and 5 years using the International Cartilage Repair Society morphologic score system (MSS) as the primary outcome. Pain was measured at baseline and 5 years using the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), and hip functionality was measured at baseline (presurgery), 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years using the Hip Outcome Score (HOS). The largest diameter of injury, median follow-up, side effects, complications, and improvements were described. T-test, ANOVA with multiple comparisons, and statistical power were estimated.

Results

From initially 34 cases, 25 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 5.1 ± 0.3 years. One patient (4%) reported a few side effects with filgrastim administration. No infection, tumours, or synovitis was reported. The largest diameters in zones two, three, and four were 12.4 ± 3.1 mm (n = 8), 13.5 ± 2.8 mm (n = 14), and 11.4 ± 1.9 mm (n = 3), respectively. Ninety-two percent (23/25) of patients improved their outcomes. The MSS and HOS increased from 3.8 ± 1.1 to 9.6 ± 1.5 pts (p < 0.001) and from 65.5 ± 13.0 to 93.9 ± 2.4 pts (p < 0.001), respectively. The VAS-Pain decreased from 5.3 ± 0.7 to 1.3 ± 0.6 mm (p < 0.001). The obtained a posteriori power-size was 0.99.

Conclusion

The intervention suggests a favourable impact on articular cartilage regeneration and clinical outcomes for hip chondral lesions in mixed-FAIS injuries after a median follow-up of 5.1 ± 0.3 years.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Automated xeno-free chondrogenic differentiation from human embryonic stem cells: Enhancing efficiency and ensuring high-quality mass production

Introduction

Repairing damaged cartilage poses significant challenges, particularly in cases of congenital cartilage defects such as microtia or congenital tracheal stenosis, or as a consequence of traumatic injury, as the regenerative potential of cartilage is inherently limited. Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering offer promising approaches to overcome these limitations in cartilage healing. However, the challenge lies in the size of cartilage-containing organs, which necessitates a large quantity of cells to fill the damaged areas. Therefore, pluripotent stem cells that can proliferate indefinitely are highly desirable as a cell source. This study aims to delineate the differentiation conditions for cartilage derived from human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and to develop an automated cell culture system to facilitate mass production for therapeutic applications.

Methods

Cartilage cell sheets were derived from human ESCs (SEES2, clinical trial-compatible line) by forming embryoid bodies (EBs) with either conventional manual culture or a benchtop multi-pipetter and an automated medium exchange integrated cell incubator, using xeno-free media. Cell sheets were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of immunodeficient NOG mice to obtain cartilage tissue. The properties of cartilage tissues were examined by histological staining and quantitative PCR analysis.

Results

We have optimized an efficient xeno-free system for cartilage production with the conventional culture method and successfully transitioned to an automated system. Differentiated cartilage was histologically uniform with cartilage-specific elasticity and strength. The cartilage tissues were stained by Alcian blue, safranin O, and toluidine blue, and quantitative PCR showed an increase in differentiation markers such as ACAN, COL2A1, and Vimentin. Automation significantly enhanced the efficiency of human ESC-derived chondrocyte differentiation. The number of constituent cells within EBs and the seeding density of EBs were identified as key factors influencing chondrogenic differentiation efficiency. By automating the process of chondrogenic differentiation, we achieved scalable production of chondrocytes.

Conclusions

By integrating the differentiation protocol with an automated cell culture system, there is potential to produce cartilage of sufficient size for clinical applications in humans. The resulting cartilage tissue holds promise for clinical use in repairing organs such as the trachea, joints, ears, and nose.

Advancements in tissue engineering for articular cartilage regeneration

Articular cartilage injury is a prevalent clinical condition resulting from trauma, tumors, infection, osteoarthritis, and other factors. The intrinsic lack of blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatic vessels within cartilage tissue severely limits its self-regenerative capacity after injury. Current treatment options, such as conservative drug therapy and joint replacement, have inherent limitations. Achieving perfect regeneration and repair of articular cartilage remains an ongoing challenge in the field of regenerative medicine. Tissue engineering has emerged as a key focus in articular cartilage injury research, aiming to utilize cultured and expanded tissue cells combined with suitable scaffold materials to create viable, functional tissues. This review article encompasses the latest advancements in seed cells, scaffolds, and cytokines. Additionally, the role of stimulatory factors including cytokines and growth factors, genetic engineering techniques, biophysical stimulation, and bioreactor systems, as well as the role of scaffolding materials including natural scaffolds, synthetic scaffolds, and nanostructured scaffolds in the regeneration of cartilage tissues are discussed. Finally, we also outline the signaling pathways involved in cartilage regeneration. Our review provides valuable insights for scholars to address the complex problem of cartilage regeneration and repair.

JD-312 - A novel small molecule that facilitates cartilage repair and alleviates osteoarthritis progression

Background

The chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to enhance cartilage repair and regeneration is a promising strategy to alleviate osteoarthritis (OA) progression.

Method

The potency of JD-312 in inducing chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs was assessed and verified. The efficacy of JD-312-treated MSCs was evaluated using a Sprague-Dawley rat DMM model. Additionally, the capacity of JD-312 to successfully recruit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) for the treatment of OA in vitro was confirmed via intra-articular injection. The repair status of the articular cartilage was analyzed in vivo through histological examination.

Result

In this study, we identify JD-312 as a novel non-toxic small molecule that can promote chondrogenic differentiation in human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUCMSCs) and human bone marrow MSCS (hBMSCs) in vitro. We also show that transient differentiation of MSCs with JD-312 prior to in vivo administration remarkably improves the regeneration of cartilage and promotes Col2a1 and Acan expression in rat models of DMM, in comparison to kartogenin (KGN) pre-treatment or MSCs alone. Furthermore, direct intra-articular injection of JD-312 in murine model of OA showed reduced loss of articular cartilage and improved pain parameters. Lastly, we identified that the effects of JD-312 are at least in part mediated via upregulation of genes associated with the focal adhesion, PI3K-Akt signaling and the ECM-receptor interaction pathways, and specifically cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) may play a vital role.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that JD-312 showed encouraging repair effects for OA in vivo.

The translational potential of this article

Together, our findings demonstrate that JD-312 is a promising new therapeutic molecule for cartilage regeneration with clinical potential.

Current and Novel Therapeutics for Articular Cartilage Repair and Regeneration

Articular cartilage repair is a sophisticated process that has is being recently investigated. There are several different approaches that are currently reported to promote cartilage repair, like cell-based therapies, biologics, and physical therapy. Cell-based therapies involve the using stem cells or chondrocytes, which make up cartilage, to promote the growth of new cartilage. Biologics, like growth factors, are also being applied to enhance cartilage repair. Physical therapy, like exercise and weight-bearing activities, can also be used to promote cartilage repair by inducing new cartilage growth and improving joint function. Additionally, surgical options like osteochondral autograft, autologous chondrocyte implantation, microfracture, and others are also reported for cartilage regeneration. In the current literature review, we aim to provide an up-to-date discussion about these approaches and discuss the current research status.

Knee Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Mesenchymal Stem Cells: What Else Is New? An Update

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease and the most common orthopedic disorder. A vast majority of the social OA burden is related to hips and knees. The prevalence of knee OA varied across studies and such differences are reflected by the heterogeneity of data reported by studies conducted worldwide. A complete understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this pathology is essential. The OA inflammatory process starts in the synovial membrane with the activation of the immune system, involving both humoral and cellular mediators. A crucial role in this process is played by the so-called “damage-associated molecular patterns” (DAMPs). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be a promising option among all possible therapeutic options. However, many issues are still debated, such as the best cell source, their nature, and the right amount. Further studies are needed to clarify the remaining doubts. This review provides an overview of the most recent and relevant data on the molecular mechanism of cartilage damage in knee OA, including current therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine.

Managing the Heterogeneity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cartilage Regenerative Therapy: A Review

Articular cartilage defects commonly result from trauma and are associated with significant morbidity. Since cartilage is an avascular, aneural, and alymphatic tissue with a poor intrinsic healing ability, the regeneration of functional hyaline cartilage remains a difficult clinical problem. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with multilineage differentiation potential, including the ability to differentiate into chondrocytes. Due to their availability and ease of ex vivo expansion, clinicians are increasingly applying MSCs in the treatment of cartilage lesions. However, despite encouraging pre-clinical and clinical data, inconsistencies in MSC proliferative and chondrogenic potential depending on donor, tissue source, cell subset, culture conditions, and handling techniques remain a key barrier to widespread clinical application of MSC therapy in cartilage regeneration. In this review, we highlight the strategies to manage the heterogeneity of MSCs ex vivo for more effective cartilage repair, including reducing the MSC culture expansion period, and selecting MSCs with higher chondrogenic potential through specific genetic markers, surface markers, and biophysical attributes. The accomplishment of a less heterogeneous population of culture-expanded MSCs may improve the scalability, reproducibility, and standardisation of MSC therapy for clinical application in cartilage regeneration.

Comparative effectiveness of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder, is associated with an increasing socioeconomic impact owing to the ageing population.

AIM

To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) in knee OA management from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Independent and duplicate electronic database searches were performed, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until August 2021 for RCTs that analyzed the efficacy and safety of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs in the management of knee OA. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner score, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and adverse events were analyzed. Analysis was performed on the R-platform using OpenMeta (Analyst) software. Twenty-one studies, involving 936 patients, were included. Only one study compared the two MSC sources without patient randomization; hence, the results of all included studies from both sources were pooled, and a comparative critical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

At six months, both AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs showed significant VAS improvement (P = 0.015, P = 0.012); this was inconsistent at 1 year for BM-MSCs (P < 0.001, P = 0.539), and AD-MSCs outperformed BM-MSCs compared to controls in measures such as WOMAC (P < 0.001, P = 0.541), Lysholm scores (P = 0.006; P = 0.933), and KOOS (P = 0.002; P = 0.012). BM-MSC-related procedures caused significant adverse events (P = 0.003) compared to AD-MSCs (P = 0.673).

CONCLUSION

Adipose tissue is superior to bone marrow because of its safety and consistent efficacy in improving pain and functional outcomes. Future trials are urgently warranted to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the ideal source of MSCs for managing knee OA.

Chondrocyte Isolation from Loose Bodies-An Option for Reducing Donor Site Morbidity for Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Loose bodies (LBs) from patients with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) are usually removed and discarded during surgical treatment of the defect. In this study, we address the question of whether these LBs contain sufficient viable and functional chondrocytes that could serve as a source for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and how the required prolonged in vitro expansion affects their phenotype. Chondrocytes were isolated from LBs of 18 patients and compared with control chondrocyte from non-weight-bearing joint regions (n = 7) and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs, n = 6) obtained during primary arthroplasty. No significant differences in the initial cell yield per isolation and the expression of the chondrocyte progenitor cell markers CD44 + /CD146+ were found between chondrocyte populations from LBs (LB-CH) and control patients (Ctrl-CH). During long-term expansion, LB-CH exhibited comparable viability and proliferation rates to control cells and no ultimate cell cycle arrest was observed within 12 passages respectively 15.3 ± 1.1 mean cumulative populations doublings (CPD). The chondrogenic differentiation potential was comparable between LB-CH and Ctrl-CH, but both groups showed a significantly higher ability to form a hyaline cartilage matrix in vitro than BMSC. Our data suggest that LBs are a promising cell source for obtaining qualitatively and quantitatively suitable chondrocytes for therapeutic applications, thereby circumventing donor site morbidity as a consequence of the biopsies required for the current ACI procedure.

In silico evaluation of the mechanical stimulation effect on the regenerative rehabilitation for the articular cartilage local defects

Osteoarthritis is one of the most severe diseases of the human musculoskeletal system, and therefore, for many years, special attention has been paid to the search for effective methods of its treatment. However, even the most modern methods only in a limited number of cases in the early or intermediate stages of osteoarthritis lead to positive treatment results. In the later stages of development, osteoarthritis is practically incurable and most often ends with disability or the need for joint replacement for a large number of people. One of the main reasons hindering the development of osteoarthritis treatment methods is the peculiarities of articular cartilage, in which there is practically no vascular network and tissue homeostasis is carried out mainly due to the diffusion of nutrients present in the synovial fluid. In modern medicine, for the treatment of osteoarthritis, tissue engineering strategies have been developed based on the implantation of scaffolds populated with chondrogenic cells into the area of the defect. In vitro studies have established that these cells are highly mechanosensitive and, under the influence of mechanical stimuli of a certain type and intensity, their ability to proliferate and chondrogenesis increases. This property can be used to improve the efficiency of regenerative rehabilitation technologies based on the synergistic combination of cellular technologies, tissue engineering strategies, and mechanical tissue stimulation. In this work, using a regenerative rehabilitation mathematical model of local articular cartilage defects, numerical experiments were performed, the results of which indicate that the micro-and macro environment of the restored tissue, which changes during mechanical stimulation, has a significant effect on the formation of the extracellular matrix, and, consequently, cartilage tissue generally. The results obtained can be used to plan strategies for mechanical stimulation, based on the analysis of the results of cell proliferation experimental assessment after each stimulation procedure in vivo.

The role of the immune microenvironment in bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration: from mechanism to therapeutic opportunity

Bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration is a complex spatiotemporal process recruiting a variety of cell types, whose activity and interplay must be precisely mediated for effective healing post-injury. Although extensive strides have been made in the understanding of the immune microenvironment processes governing bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration, effective clinical translation of these mechanisms remains a challenge. Regulation of the immune microenvironment is increasingly becoming a favorable target for bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration; therefore, an in-depth understanding of the communication between immune cells and functional tissue cells would be valuable. Herein, we review the regulatory role of the immune microenvironment in the promotion and maintenance of stem cell states in the context of bone, cartilage, and soft tissue repair and regeneration. We discuss the roles of various immune cell subsets in bone, cartilage, and soft tissue repair and regeneration processes and introduce novel strategies, for example, biomaterial-targeting of immune cell activity, aimed at regulating healing. Understanding the mechanisms of the crosstalk between the immune microenvironment and regeneration pathways may shed light on new therapeutic opportunities for enhancing bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration through regulation of the immune microenvironment.

Modification of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage-targeted therapy

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease characterized by the destruction of the articular cartilage, sclerosis of the subchondral bone, and joint dysfunction. Its pathogenesis is attributed to direct damage and mechanical destruction of joint tissues. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), suggested as a potential strategy for the treatment of OA, have shown therapeutic effects on OA. However, the specific fate of MSCs after intraarticular injection, including cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation, and death, is still unclear, and there is no guarantee that stem cells can be retained in the cartilage tissue to enact repair. Direct homing of MSCs is an important determinant of the efficacy of MSC-based cartilage repair. Recent studies have revealed that the unique homing capacity of MSCs and targeted modification can improve their ability to promote tissue regeneration. Here, we comprehensively review the homing effect of stem cells in joints and highlight progress toward the targeted modification of MSCs. In the future, developments of this targeting system that accelerate tissue regeneration will benefit targeted tissue repair.

The sternum reconstruction: Present and future perspectives

Sternectomy is a procedure mainly used for removing tumor masses infiltrating the sternum or treating infections. Moreover, the removal of the sternum involves the additional challenge of performing a functional reconstruction. Fortunately, various approaches have been proposed for improving the operation and outcome of reconstruction, including allograft transplantation, using novel materials, and developing innovative surgical approaches, which promise to enhance the quality of life for the patient. This review will highlight the surgical approaches to sternum reconstruction and the new perspectives in the current literature.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Studies in the Goat Model for Biomedical Research-A Review of the Scientific Literature

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells, defined by their ability to self-renew, while maintaining the capacity to differentiate into different cellular lineages, presumably from their own germinal layer. MSCs therapy is based on its anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and regenerative potential. Firstly, they can differentiate into the target cell type, allowing them to regenerate the damaged area. Secondly, they have a great immunomodulatory capacity through paracrine effects (by secreting several cytokines and growth factors to adjacent cells) and by cell-to-cell contact, leading to vascularization, cellular proliferation in wounded tissues, and reducing inflammation. Currently, MSCs are being widely investigated for numerous tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Appropriate animal models are crucial for the development and evaluation of regenerative medicine-based treatments and eventual treatments for debilitating diseases with the hope of application in upcoming human clinical trials. Here, we summarize the latest research focused on studying the biological and therapeutic potential of MSCs in the goat model, namely in the fields of orthopedics, dermatology, ophthalmology, dentistry, pneumology, cardiology, and urology fields.

Peripheral Blood-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Cartilage Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background: The treatment of cartilage damage is a hot topic at present, and cell therapy is an emerging alternative therapy. Stem cells derived from peripheral blood have become the focus of current research due to the ease of obtaining materials and a wide range of sources.

Methods: We used a text search strategy using the [“mesenchymal stem cells” (MeSH term) OR “MSC” OR “BMMSC” OR “PBMSC” OR” PBMNC” OR “peripheral blood stem cells”] AND (cartilage injury [MeSH term] OR “cartilage” OR “chondral lesion”). After searching the literature, through the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the last included articles were systematically reviewed.

Result: We found that peripheral blood-derived stem cells have chondrogenic differentiation ability and can induce chondrogenic differentiation and repair in vivo and have statistical significance in clinical and imaging prognosis. It is an improvement of academic differences. Compared with the bone marrow, peripheral blood is easier to obtain, widely sourced, and simple to obtain. In the future, peripheral blood will be a more potential cell source for cell therapy in the treatment of cartilage damage.

Conclusion: Stem cells derived from peripheral blood can repair cartilage and are an important resource for the treatment of cartilage damage in the future. The specific mechanism and way of repairing cartilage need further study.

Insights into the implementation of Fibronectin 1 in the cartilage tissue engineering

Recently, cartilage tissue engineering has become a cornerstone to treat cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis (OA). Fibronectin1 (FN1) is described as multiple functional glycoproteins that play an essential role in chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation. Few studies reported the potential of FN1 to enhance tissue engineering and reduce the death of chondrocytes in OA. Further, FN1 possesses multiple binding domains including collagen, integrin, and heparin that can interact with heparan sulfate proteoglycans at the surface of chondrocyte leading to promote cell signaling and differentiation. Recent studies suggested that FN1 can promote chondrocyte differentiation by upregulating TGF-β/PI3K/Akt pathways. Further, FN1 can inhibit the apoptosis of chondrocytes by preventing the release of metalloproteinases through lowering the expression of p-PI3K/PI3K and p-AKT/AKT pathways. However, the use of FN1 in cartilage repair studies using animal models or clinical trials was rarely reported. Therefore, this article provides new insights into the importance of FN1 in cartilage tissue engineering to encourage more studies concerning FN1 in cartilage repair studies. Further, we provided new suggestions for advanced applications of FN1 to treat OA and cartilage degeneration.

Strategies for Articular Cartilage Repair and Regeneration

Articular cartilage is an avascular tissue, with limited ability to repair and self-renew. Defects in articular cartilage can induce debilitating degenerative joint diseases such as osteoarthritis. Currently, clinical treatments have limited ability to repair, for they often result in the formation of mechanically inferior cartilage. In this review, we discuss the factors that affect cartilage homeostasis and function, and describe the emerging regenerative approaches that are informing the future treatment options.

The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in treating osteoporosis

Osteoporosis (OP), a common systemic metabolic bone disease, is characterized by low bone mass, increasing bone fragility and a high risk of fracture. At present, the clinical treatment of OP mainly involves anti-bone resorption drugs and anabolic agents for bone, but their long-term use can cause serious side effects. The development of stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine has provided a new approach to the clinical treatment of various diseases, even with a hope for cure. Recently, the therapeutic advantages of the therapy have been shown for a variety of orthopedic diseases. However, these stem cell-based researches are currently limited to animal models; the uncertainty regarding the post-transplantation fate of stem cells and their safety in recipients has largely restricted the development of human clinical trials. Nevertheless, the feasibility of mesenchymal stem cells to treat osteoporotic mice has drawn a growing amount of intriguing attention from clinicians to its potential of applying the stem cell-based therapy as a new therapeutic approach to OP in the future clinic. In the current review, therefore, we explored the potential use of mesenchymal stem cells in human OP treatment.

Collagen type II: From biosynthesis to advanced biomaterials for cartilage engineering

Collagen type II is the major constituent of cartilage tissue. Yet, cartilage engineering approaches are primarily based on collagen type I devices that are associated with suboptimal functional therapeutic outcomes. Herein, we briefly describe cartilage's development and cellular and extracellular composition and organisation. We also provide an overview of collagen type II biosynthesis and purification protocols from tissues of terrestrial and marine species and recombinant systems. We then advocate the use of collagen type II as a building block in cartilage engineering approaches, based on safety, efficiency and efficacy data that have been derived over the years from numerous in vitro and in vivo studies.

Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells therapy in musculoskeletal injuries in dogs-a review of the scientific literature

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent, which is defined by their ability to self-renew while maintaining the capacity to differentiate into a certain number of cells, presumably from their own germinal layer. MSCs therapy is based on their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory (immunosuppressive), and regenerative potential. This review aims to provide a clinical overview of the MSCs potential as a therapeutic option for orthopedic diseases in dogs. A total of 25 clinical studies published in the scientific literature in the last 15 years on various diseases will be presented: semitendinosus myopathy, supraspinatus tendinopathy, cruciate ligament rupture, bone fractures and defects, and also osteoarthritis (OA). All articles involved in this study include only diseases that have naturally occurred in canine patients. MSCs therapy in the veterinary orthopedic field has great potential, especially for OA. All studies presented promising results. However, MSCs bone healing capacity did not reveal such favorable outcomes in the long term. Besides, most of these clinical studies did not include immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and histopathology to confirm that MSCs have differentiated and incorporated into the injured tissues. This review summarizes the current knowledge of canine MSCs biology, immunology, and clinical application in canine orthopedic diseases. Despite the positive results in its use, there is still a lack of defined protocols, heterogeneous samples, and concomitant medications used with MSCs therapy compromising therapeutic effects. Further studies are needed in the hope of overcoming its limitation in upcoming trials.

Over-expression of MEG3 promotes differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes by regulating miR-129-5p/RUNX1 axis

This study explored the role of MEG3 in the cartilage differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). We investigated the effects of over-expression and knockdown of MEG3 on cell viability, cell differentiation, and the expressions of MEG3, miR-129-5p, COL2, chondrocyte differentiation-related genes (sry-type high-mobility-group box 9 (SOX9), SOX5, Aggrecan, silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1), and Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP)). The targeting relationship between MEG3 and miR-129-5p and the target gene of miR-129-5p was confirmed through Starbase, TargetScan and luciferase experiments. Finally, a series of rescue experiments were conducted to study the regulatory effects of MEG3 and miR-129-5p. BMSCs were identified as CD29⁺ and CD44⁺ positive, and their differentiation was time-dependent. As BMSCs differentiated, MEG3 expression was up-regulated, but miR-129-5p was down-regulated. Over-expressed MEG3 promoted the viability and differentiation of BMSCs, up-regulated the expressions of COL2 and chondrocyte differentiation-related genes, and inhibited miR-129-5p. Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) was negatively regulated as a target gene of miR-129-5p. Results of rescue experiments showed that the inhibitory effect of miR-129-5p mimic on BMSCs could be partially reversed by MEG3. Over-expression of MEG3 regulated the miR-129-5p/RUNX1 axis to promote the differentiation of BMSCs into chondrocytes. This study provides a reliable basis for the application of lncRNA in articular cartilage injury.

Ultrasound combined with SDF-1α chemotactic microbubbles promotes stem cell homing in an osteoarthritis model

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease in the middle and old age group with obvious cartilage damage, and the regeneration of cartilage is the key to alleviating or treating OA. In stem cell therapy, bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) has been confirmed to have cartilage regeneration ability. However, the role of stem cells in promoting articular cartilage regeneration is severely limited by their low homing rate. Stromal cell‐derived factor‐1α (SDF‐1α) plays a vital role in MSC migration and involves activation, mobilization, homing and retention. So, we aim to develop SDF‐1α‐loaded microbubbles MB(SDF‐1α), and to verify the migration of BMSCs with the effect of ultrasound combined with MB(SDF‐1α) in vitro and in vivo. The characteristics of microbubbles and the content of SDF‐1α were examined in vitro. To evaluate the effect of ultrasound combined with chemotactic microbubbles on stem cell migration, BMSCs were injected locally and intravenously into the knee joint of the OA model, and the markers of BMSCs in the cartilage were detected. We successfully prepared MB(SDF‐1α) through covalent bonding with impressive SDF‐1α loading efficacy loading content. In vitro study, ultrasound combined with MB(SDF‐1α) group can promote more stem cell migration with highest migrating cell counts, good cell viability and highest CXCR4 expression. In vivo experiment, more BMSCs surface markers presented in the ultrasound combined with MB(SDF‐1α) group with or without exogenous BMSCs administration. Hence, ultrasound combined with MB(SDF‐1α) could promote the homing of BMSCs to cartilage and provide a novel promising therapeutic approach for OA.

Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration

Cartilage injuries are typically caused by trauma, chronic overload, and autoimmune diseases. Owing to the avascular structure and low metabolic activities of chondrocytes, cartilage generally does not self-repair following an injury. Currently, clinical interventions for cartilage injuries include chondrocyte implantation, microfracture, and osteochondral transplantation. However, rather than restoring cartilage integrity, these methods only postpone further cartilage deterioration. Stem cell therapies, especially mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) therapies, were found to be a feasible strategy in the treatment of cartilage injuries. MSCs can easily be isolated from mesenchymal tissue and be differentiated into chondrocytes with the support of chondrogenic factors or scaffolds to repair damaged cartilage tissue. In this review, we highlighted the full success of cartilage repair using MSCs, or MSCs in combination with chondrogenic factors and scaffolds, and predicted their pros and cons for prospective translation to clinical practice.

Intra-articular administration of peripheral blood stem cells with platelet-rich plasma regenerated articular cartilage and improved clinical outcomes for knee chondral lesions

PURPOSE

To determine whether intra-articular injections of peripheral blood stem cells improved the regeneration of articular cartilage in patients with osteochondral knee injuries.

METHODS

This prospective study included 20 patients with grade 3b knee osteochondral lesions who underwent knee arthroscopies. All were white, and all had performed physical activity at least five times a week. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and visual analog scale scores were recorded before surgery, six months and one year after surgery, and then yearly until five years after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained six months preoperatively and then yearly and were evaluated by musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to the patient data. Tissue repair was quantified using the International Cartilage Repair Society morphologic score system. Unpaired t-tests were used for comparisons between the time points.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative IKDC score was 50.5 (42-61). At the six-month follow-up, the mean values were 60.79 (P = 0.32) and 90.97. At the six-month follow-up, the mean values were 70.8 (P = 0.043). At the end of the five-year follow-up, the IKDC was 82.2 (P = 0.024). At five-year follow-up, the visual analog scale score was 1.1 (P = 0.0018). The main morphologic score system score was 3.2 preoperatively and 9.7 ± 1.6 at five-year follow-up (P = 0.0021). No infection, tumors, or synovitis were reported at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular peripheral blood stem cells with platelet-rich plasma regenerated articular cartilage and improved clinical outcomes for knee chondral lesions at five years of follow-up.

Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration in dogs

Articular cartilage damage and osteoarthritis (OA) are common orthopedic diseases in both humans and dogs. Once damaged, the articular cartilage seldom undergoes spontaneous repair because of its avascular, aneural, and alymphatic state, and the damage progresses to a chronic and painful situation. Dogs have distinctive characteristics compared to other laboratory animal species in that they share an OA pathology with humans. Dogs can also require treatment for naturally developed OA; therefore, effective treatment methods for OA are desired in veterinary medicine as well as in human medicine. Recently, interest has grown in regenerative medicine that includes the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In cartilage repair, MSCs are a promising therapeutic tool due to their self-renewal capacity, ability to differentiate into cartilage, potential for trophic factor production, and capacity for immunomodulation. The MSCs from dogs (canine MSCs; cMSCs) share various characteristics with MSCs from other animal species, but they show some deviations, particularly in their differentiation ability and surface epitope expression. In vivo studies of cMSCs have demonstrated that intraarticular cMSC injection into cartilage lesions results in excellent hyaline cartilage regeneration. In clinical situations, cMSCs have shown great therapeutic effects, including amelioration of pain and lameness in dogs suffering from OA. However, some issues remain, such as a lack of regulations or guidelines and a need for unified methods for the use of cMSCs. This review summarizes what is known about cMSCs, including their in vitro characteristics, their therapeutic effects in cartilage lesion treatment in preclinical in vivo studies, their clinical efficacy for treatment of naturally developed OA in dogs, and the current limitations of cMSC studies.

Accelerated Growth of Cellular Therapy Trials in Musculoskeletal Disorders: An Analysis of the NIH Clinical Trials Data Bank

The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the growth rate and the trends of musculoskeletal cellular therapy trials in the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Data Bank; (2) analyze the study design and characteristics; and (3) assess which cellular therapies and disease conditions are studied. A systematic review of musculoskeletal clinical trials from 2005 to 2016 using cell-based therapies as the primary intervention was performed through ClinicalTrials.gov. The number of musculoskeletal cell-based clinical trials is increasing, with most being early stage, phase I/II, and using autologous cells harvested mostly from bone marrow to target cartilage-related diseases. Among the 282 clinical trials identified, only 99 (35.1%) were completed; 62 of the 99 (62.6%) did not list any related publications. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e144-e150.].

Synovium-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells and their Promise for Cartilage Regeneration

Adult tissues are reservoirs of rare populations of cells known as mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) that have tissue-regenerating features retained from embryonic development. As well as building up the musculoskeletal system in early life, MSCs also replenish and repair tissues in adult life, such as bone, cartilage, muscle, and adipose tissue. Cells that show regenerative features at least in vitro have been identified from several connective tissues. Bone marrow and adipose tissue are the most well recognized sources of MSCs that are already used widely in clinical practice. Regenerative medicine aims to exploit MSCs and their tissue regeneration even though the underlying mechanisms for their beneficial effects are largely unknown. Despite many studies that have used various tissue-derived MSCs, the most effective tissue source for orthopedic procedures still remains to be identified. Another question that needs to be addressed is how to evaluate autologous MSCs (i.e., patient derived). Previous studies have suggested the features of bone-marrow-derived MSCs can differ widely between individuals, and can be changed in particular in patients suffering from some forms of degenerative disorder, such as osteoarthritis. The synovium is a thin membrane that protects the synovial joints, and it is a rich source of MSCs that show great potential for regenerative medicine. Here, we review synovium-derived MSCs from reports on basic and clinical studies. We discuss their potential to treat cartilage defects caused by either degeneration or trauma, and what needs to be done in further research toward their better exploitation for joint regeneration.

A Comparison of Bone Marrow and Cord Blood Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cartilage Self-Assembly

Joint injury is a common cause of premature retirement for the human and equine athlete alike. Implantation of engineered cartilage offers the potential to increase the success rate of surgical intervention and hasten recovery times. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a particularly attractive cell source for cartilage engineering. While bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) have been most extensively characterized for musculoskeletal tissue engineering, studies suggest that cord blood MSCs (CB-MSCs) may elicit a more robust chondrogenic phenotype. The objective of this study was to determine a superior equine MSC source for cartilage engineering. MSCs derived from bone marrow or cord blood were stimulated to undergo chondrogenesis through aggregate redifferentiation and used to generate cartilage through the self-assembling process. The resulting neocartilage produced from either BM-MSCs or CB-MSCs was compared by measuring mechanical, biochemical, and histological properties. We found that while BM constructs possessed higher tensile properties and collagen content, CB constructs had superior compressive properties comparable to that of native tissue and higher GAG content. Moreover, CB constructs had alkaline phosphatase activity, collagen type X, and collagen type II on par with native tissue suggesting a more hyaline cartilage-like phenotype. In conclusion, while both BM-MSCs and CB-MSCs were able to form neocartilage, CB-MSCs resulted in tissue more closely resembling native equine articular cartilage as determined by a quantitative functionality index. Therefore, CB-MSCs are deemed a superior source for the purpose of articular cartilage self-assembly.

Is there a role for stem cells in treating articular injury?

Articular cartilage is a specialized tissue with a high prevalence of injuries. The complex architecture of articular cartilage means that injuries are difficult to treat. The sequelae of such injuries include post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Current treatments include microfracture, microdrilling, osteochondral transplantation and matrix autologous chondral implantation. However, current surgical therapies have a number of disadvantages. Mesenchymal stem cells have been suggested as a potential alternative therapy, with a theoretical ability to regenerate articular cartilage. Research, although positive, is mainly limited to case series, in which the follow up is short to medium term. Stem cells may hold the answer to the age-old problem of articular cartilage injury but more robust evidence is required.

Clinical efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for osteoarthritis treatment: A meta-analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Materials

We performed a meta-analysis of relevant published clinical studies. An electronic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MSC-based therapy in knee OA. The visual analogue scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne algofunctional indices (Lequesne), Lysholm knee scale (Lysholm), Tegner activity scale (Tegner) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

Results

Eleven eligible trials with 582 knee OA patients were included in the present meta-analysis. We demonstrated that MSC treatment could significantly decrease VAS and increase IKDC scoresafter a 24-month follow-up compared with controls (P<0.05). MSC therapy also showed significant decreases in WOMAC and Lequesne scores after the 12-month follow-up (P<0.01). Analysis of Lysholm (24-month) and Tegner (12- and 24-month) scores also demonstrated favorable results for MSC treatment (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, MSC transplantation treatment was shown to be safe and has great potential as an efficacious clinical therapy for patients with knee OA.

Trauma and Stem Cells: Biology and Potential Therapeutic Implications

Trauma may cause irreversible tissue damage and loss of function despite current best practice. Healing is dependent both on the nature of the injury and the intrinsic biological capacity of those tissues for healing. Preclinical research has highlighted stem cell therapy as a potential avenue for improving outcomes for injuries with poor healing capacity. Additionally, trauma activates the immune system and alters stem cell behaviour. This paper reviews the current literature on stem cells and its relevance to trauma care. Emphasis is placed on understanding how stem cells respond to trauma and pertinent mechanisms that can be utilised to promote tissue healing. Research involving notable difficulties in trauma care such as fracture non-union, cartilage damage and trauma induced inflammation is discussed further.

Characteristics, applications and prospects of mesenchymal stem cells in cell therapy

Recent advances in the field of cell therapy and regenerative medicine describe mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as potential biological products due to their ability to self-renew and differentiate. MSCs are multipotent adult cells with immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, and, given their therapeutic potential, they are being widely studied in order to evaluate their viability, safety and efficacy. In this review, we describe the main characteristics and cellular sources of MSCs, in addition to providing an overview of their properties and current clinical applications, as well offering updated information on the regulatory aspects that define them as somatic cell therapy products. Cell therapy based on MSCs is offered nowadays as a pharmacological alternative, although there are still challenges to be addressed in this regard.

Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Cocultured with Chondrocytes Promote the Proliferation of Chondrocytes

Articular cartilage injury and defect caused by trauma and chronic osteoarthritis vascularity are very common, while the repair of injured cartilage remains a great challenge due to its limited healing capacity. Stem cell-based tissue engineering provides a promising treatment option for injured articular cartilage because of the cells potential for multiple differentiations. However, its application has been largely limited by stem cell type, number, source, proliferation, and differentiation. We hypothesized that (1) adipose-derived stem cells are ideal seed cells for articular cartilage repair because of their accessibility and abundance and (2) the microenvironment of articular cartilage could induce adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) to differentiate into chondrocytes. In order to test our hypotheses, we isolated stem cells from rabbit adipose tissues and cocultured these ADSCs with rabbit articular cartilage chondrocytes. We found that when ADSCs were cocultured with chondrocytes, the proliferation of articular cartilage chondrocytes was promoted, the apoptosis of chondrocytes was inhibited, and the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of ADSCs was enhanced. The study on the mechanism of this coculture system indicated that the role of this coculture system is similar to the function of TGF-β1 in the promotion of chondrocytes.