Cell therapy for neuropathic pain in spinal cord injuries

Neural stem/progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury treatment; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite the vast improvements of cell therapy in spinal cord injury treatment, no optimum protocol has been developed for application of neural stem/progenitor cells. In this regard, the present meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of the neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation depends mainly on injury model, intervention phase, transplanted cell count, immunosuppressive use, and probably stem cell source. Improved functional recovery post NSPC transplantation was found to be higher in transection and contusion models. Moreover, NSPC transplantation in acute phase of spinal injury was found to have better functional recovery. Higher doses (>3×10(6)cell/kg) were also shown to be optimum for transplantation, but immunosuppressive agent administration negatively affected the motor function recovery. Scaffold use in NSPC transplantation could also effectively raise functional recovery.

Cell transplantation as a pain therapy targets both analgesia and neural repair

Cell transplantation is a potentially powerful approach for the alleviation of chronic pain. The strategy of cell transplantation for the treatment of pain is focused on cell-based analgesia and neural repair. (1) Adrenal medullary chromaffin cells and the PC12 cell line have been used to treat cancer pain and neuropathic pain in both animal models and human cases. As biological or living minipumps, these cells produce and secrete pain-reducing neuroactive substances if administered directly into the spinal subarachnoid space. (2) Cell implantation for pain neurorestorative therapy is a new concept and an emerging research field for pain control along with neural repair. Possible neurorestorative mechanisms include neuroprotective, neurotrophic, neuroreparative, neuroregenerative, neuromodulation, or neuroconstructive interventions, as well as immunomodulation and enhancing the microcirculation. These factors may ultimately restore the damaged or irritated condition of the lesioned nerves. The growing preclinical and clinical data show that neural stem/progenitor cells, olfactory ensheathing cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, and CD34(+) cells have the capacity to manage intractable pain and improve neurological functions. Cell delivery routes include local, intrathecal, or intravascular implants. Although these strategies are still in their infancy phase for pain neurorestoratology, cell-based therapies could open up new avenues for the relief of pain. In this review, these aspects are critically analyzed based on our own investigations. This manuscript is published as part of the International Association of Neurorestoratology (IANR) supplement issue of Cell Transplantation.

Subarachnoid Transplant of the Human Neuronal hNT2.19 Serotonergic Cell Line Attenuates Behavioral Hypersensitivity without Affecting Motor Dysfunction after Severe Contusive Spinal Cord Injury

Transplant of cells which make biologic agents that can modulate the sensory and motor responses after spinal cord injury (SCI) would be useful to treat pain and paralysis. To address this need for clinically useful human cells, a unique neuronal cell line that synthesizes and secretes/releases the neurotransmitter serotonin (5HT) was isolated. Hind paw tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia induced by severe contusive SCI were potently reversed after lumbar subarachnoid transplant of differentiated cells, but had no effect on open field motor scores, stride length, foot rotation, base of support, or gridwalk footfall errors associated with the SCI. The sensory effects appeared 1 week after transplant and did not diminish during the 8-week course of the experiment when grafts were placed 2 weeks after SCI. Many grafted cells were still present and synthesizing 5HT at the end of the study. These data suggest that the human neuronal serotonergic hNT2.19 cells can be used as a biologic minipump for receiving SCI-related neuropathic pain, but likely requires intraspinal grafts for motor recovery.

Treatment of spinal cord injury by transplantation of cells via cerebrospinal fluid

It is very important to probe into the axonal regeneration and functional recovery of central nervous system (CNS) after implantation of cells into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for spinal cord injury (SCI). Transplantation of cells via CSF poses great potentials for SCI in clinic. Studies on administration of cells via CSF indicate that the method is safe and convenient. The method is more suitable to treating multiple lesions of the CNS since it does not produce open lesions. However, there are disputes over its promotion effects on axonal regeneration and functional recovery of spinal cord after injury; and some questions, such as the mechanisms of functional recovery of spinal cord, the proper time window of cell transplantation, and cell types of transplantation, still need to be handled. This review summarized the method of cell transplantation via CSF for treatment of SCI.

Treatments for spinal cord injury: is there hope in neurosteroids?

In this review, we describe the current therapeutic strategies to find a cure for paralysis. We use the example of DHEA, a neurosteroid normally produced in the developing neural tube, to raise the hypothesis that such a class of molecules, capable of modulating proliferation of committed neural precursors, could serve as an environmental cue in the adult injured spinal cord to promote re-population of CNS lesion with endogenous dormant precursor cells. Such mechanism may be a part of the natural response to heal the injured CNS and promote recovery of function, suggesting that neurosteroid-treatment could be a promising and novel therapeutic avenue for SCI. We will review pertinent biological activities of DHEA supporting this hypothesis, demonstrate that such activities, dependent on an intact sonic-hedgehog pathway, are responsible for the motor and bladder functional recovery observed after DHEA-treatment in the adult injured spinal cord. We will also raise the current limitations to further development of DHEA- or other neurosteroid-treatments as drug candidates, including the urgent need to further document DHEA long-term safety in CNS indications.

Subarachnoid Transplant of a Human Neuronal Cell Line Attenuates Chronic Allodynia and Hyperalgesia After Excitotoxic Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat

The relief of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) remains daunting, because pharmacologic intervention works incompletely and is accompanied by multiple side effects. Transplantation of human cells that make specific biologic agents that can potentially modulate the sensory responses that are painful would be very useful to treat problems such as pain. To address this need for clinically useful human cells, the human neuronal NT2 cell line was used as a source to isolate a unique human neuronal cell line that synthesizes and secretes/releases the inhibitory neurotransmitters gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine. This new cell line, hNT2.17, expresses an exclusively neuronal phenotype, does not incorporate bromodeoxyuridine during differentiation, and does not express the tumor-related proteins fibroblast growth factor 4 and transforming growth factor-alpha during differentiation after 2 weeks of treatment with retinoic acid and mitotic inhibitors. The transplant of predifferentiated hNT2.17 cells was used in the excitotoxic SCI pain model, after intraspinal injection of the mixed AMPA/metabotropic receptor agonist quisqualic acid (QUIS). When hNT2.17 cells were transplanted into the lumbar subarachnoid space, tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia induced by the injury were quickly and potently reversed. Control cell transplants of nonviable hNT2.17 cells had no effect on the hypersensitivity induced by QUIS. The effects of hNT2.17 cell grafts appeared 1 week after transplants and did not diminish during the 8-week course of the experiment when grafts were placed 2 weeks after SCI. Immunohistochemistry and quantification of the human grafts were used to ensure that many grafted cells were still present and synthesizing GABA at the end of the study. These data suggest that the human neuronal hNT2.17 cells can be used as a "biologic minipump" for antinociception in models of SCI and neuropathic pain.

PERSPECTIVE

This study describes the initial characterization and use of a human-derived cell line to treat neuropathic pain that would be suitable for clinical application, once further tested for safety and approved by the Food and Drug Administration. A dose of these human cells could be delivered with a spinal tap and affect the intrathecal spinal environment for sensory system modulation.

New targets for neuropathic pain therapeutics

Neuropathic pain (NeP) is initiated by a lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system. Unlike physiological pain it serves no useful purpose and is usually sustained and chronic. NeP encompasses a wide range of pain syndromes of diverse aetiologies which together account for > 12 million sufferers in the US. Currently, there are a number of therapies available for NeP, including gabapentin, pregabalin, anticonvulsants (tiagabine HCl), tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline) and acetaminophen/opioid combination products (Vicodin, Tylenol #3). However, these products do not provide sufficient pain relief and a significant proportion of sufferers are refractory (60%). Therefore, there is a need for new therapies that provide more predictable efficacy in all patients with improved tolerability. Over the last decade, understanding of the basic mechanisms contributing to the generation of NeP in preclinical animal models has greatly improved. Together with the completion of the various genome sequencing projects and significant advances in microarray and target validation strategies, new therapeutic approaches are being rigourously pursued. This article reviews the rationale behind a number of these mechanism-based approaches, briefly discusses specific challenges that they face, and finally, speculates on the potential of emerging technologies as alternative therapeutic strategies to the traditional 'small-molecule' approach.