1
|
Fadlallah H, El Masri J, Fakhereddine H, Youssef J, Chemaly C, Doughan S, Abou-Kheir W. Colorectal cancer: Recent advances in management and treatment. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:1136-1156. [PMID: 39351451 PMCID: PMC11438855 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. In 2020, the estimated number of deaths due to CRC was approximately 930000, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths worldwide. Accordingly, there is a vast amount of ongoing research aiming to find new and improved treatment modalities for CRC that can potentially increase survival and decrease overall morbidity and mortality. Current management strategies for CRC include surgical procedures for resectable cases, and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, in addition to their combination, for non-resectable tumors. Despite these options, CRC remains incurable in 50% of cases. Nonetheless, significant improvements in research techniques have allowed for treatment approaches for CRC to be frequently updated, leading to the availability of new drugs and therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the most recent therapeutic approaches for CRC, with special emphasis on new strategies that are currently being studied and have great potential to improve the prognosis and lifespan of patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Fadlallah
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Jad El Masri
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Hiam Fakhereddine
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Joe Youssef
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Chrystelle Chemaly
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Samer Doughan
- Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Wassim Abou-Kheir
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang M, Du Q, Zuo L, Xue P, Lan C, Sun Z. Metabolism and Distribution of Novel Tumor Targeting Drugs In Vivo. Curr Drug Metab 2020; 21:996-1008. [PMID: 33183197 DOI: 10.2174/1389200221666201112110638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a new tumor therapy, targeted therapy is becoming a hot topic due to its high efficiency and low toxicity. Drug effects of targeted tumor drugs are closely related to pharmacokinetics, so it is important to understand their distribution and metabolism in vivo. METHODS A systematic review of the literature on the metabolism and distribution of targeted drugs over the past 20 years was conducted, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of approved targeted drugs were summarized in combination with the FDA's drug instructions. Targeting drugs are divided into two categories: small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Novel targeting drugs and their mechanisms of action, which have been developed in recent years, are summarized. The distribution and metabolic processes of each drug in the human body are reviewed. RESULTS In this review, we found that the distribution and metabolism of small molecule kinase inhibitors (TKI) and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) showed different characteristics based on the differences of action mechanism and molecular characteristics. TKI absorbed rapidly (Tmax ≈ 1-4 h) and distributed in large amounts (Vd > 100 L). It was mainly oxidized and reduced by cytochrome P450 CYP3A4. However, due to the large molecular diameter, mAb was distributed to tissues slowly, and the volume of distribution was usually very low (Vd < 10 L). It was mainly hydrolyzed and metabolized into peptides and amino acids by protease hydrolysis. In addition, some of the latest drugs are still in clinical trials, and the in vivo process still needs further study. CONCLUSION According to the summary of the research progress of the existing targeting drugs, it is found that they have high specificity, but there are still deficiencies in drug resistance and safety. Therefore, the development of safer and more effective targeted drugs is the future research direction. Meanwhile, this study also provides a theoretical basis for clinical accurate drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengli Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Qiuzheng Du
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Lihua Zuo
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Peng Xue
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Chao Lan
- Department of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Zhi Sun
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies used in oncology: Part 1, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific T-cell engagers. Eur J Cancer 2020; 128:107-118. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
4
|
García-Foncillas J, Sunakawa Y, Aderka D, Wainberg Z, Ronga P, Witzler P, Stintzing S. Distinguishing Features of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors. Front Oncol 2019; 9:849. [PMID: 31616627 PMCID: PMC6763619 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Cetuximab and panitumumab are two distinct monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and both are widely used in combination with chemotherapy or as monotherapy to treat patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Although often considered interchangeable, the two antibodies have different molecular structures and can behave differently in clinically relevant ways. More specifically, as an immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 isotype mAb, cetuximab can elicit immune functions such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity involving natural killer cells, T-cell recruitment to the tumor, and T-cell priming via dendritic cell maturation. Panitumumab, an IgG2 isotype mAb, does not possess these immune functions. Furthermore, the two antibodies have different binding sites on the EGFR, as evidenced by mutations on the extracellular domain that can confer resistance to one of the two therapeutics or to both. We consider a comparison of the properties of these two antibodies to represent a gap in the literature. We therefore compiled a detailed, evidence-based educational review of the known molecular, clinical, and functional differences between the two antibodies and concluded that they are distinct therapeutic agents that should be considered individually during treatment planning. Available data for one agent can only partly be extrapolated to the other. Looking to the future, the known immune activity of cetuximab may provide a rationale for this antibody as a combination partner with investigational chemotherapy plus immunotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús García-Foncillas
- Cancer Institute, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Dan Aderka
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Zev Wainberg
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM) Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corsini LR, Fanale D, Passiglia F, Incorvaia L, Gennusa V, Bazan V, Russo A. Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of non-hematological tumors: a safety review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:1197-1209. [PMID: 30457416 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1550068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The introduction of monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) into clinical practice revolutionized the treatment strategies in several solid tumors. These agents differ from cytotoxic chemotherapy for their mechanism of action and toxicity. By targeting specific antigens present on healthy cells and modulating immune system activity, these biological drugs are able to generate a wide spectrum of peculiar adverse events that can negatively impact on patients' quality of life. Areas covered: In this review, the main side effects associated with the use of moAbs have been described to show their incidence and current management strategies, which may drive clinicians in their daily practice. Expert opinion: The majority of these drugs represents an example of successful innovation, since they are able to induce a significant improvement of patients' survival and quality of life without any increase in related side effects as compared to standard cancer treatments. For this reason, they have become new milestones in personalized therapy for different non-hematological malignancies. With the increasing use of moAbs in treatment regimens, it is strongly recommended that clinicians are knowledgeable about the side effects associated with these agents, their management and monitoring, to optimize the clinical treatment of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Rita Corsini
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Daniele Fanale
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Francesco Passiglia
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Lorena Incorvaia
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Vincenzo Gennusa
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Viviana Bazan
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- a Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Development and validation of an ELISA to study panitumumab pharmacokinetics. Bioanalysis 2018; 10:205-214. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2016-0292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR that is approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. To investigate its pharmacokinetics and concentration–response relationship, a validated assay is required. Results: An ELISA assay was developed and validated according to international recommendations. Six calibrators (ranging from 0.1 to 20 mg/l) plus one anchor point (50 mg/l) and three quality controls (0.45, 2 and 8 mg/l) were defined. The limit of detection, lower limit of quantification and upper limit of quantification were 0.033, 0.112 and 10 mg/l, respectively. Conclusion: This method is validated and can be used to study pharmacokinetics of panitumumab or to perform therapeutic drug monitoring.
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang C, Luo H. miR-19-5p Enhances Tumorigenesis in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells by Targeting TSPYL5. DNA Cell Biol 2017; 37:23-30. [PMID: 29240449 DOI: 10.1089/dna.2017.3804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The cancer suppressor gene, testis-specific protein Y-encoded-like 5 (TSPYL5), has been implicated in various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we investigated the role of TSPYL5 in the development of CRC in vitro. First, we used bioinformatics to predict the binding target of TSPYL5, and found that the microRNA, miR-19-5p, bound to the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of TSPYL5. This interaction was further validated by the dual-luciferase assay. Second, we found that overexpressed TSPYL5 enhanced apoptosis in HT29 cells and reduced cell proliferation, reduced cell migration/invasion, and most of the cells accumulated in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. These effects were reversed after addition of miR-19-5p mimics. Third, knocking down expression of miR-19-5p also increased apoptosis, and reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in HT29 cells. We speculate that miR-19-5p induces the degradation of TSPYL5 by binding to its 3'UTR. Our results suggest that increasing the expression of TSPYL5 in HT29 cells or inhibiting miR-19-5p promotes apoptosis of HT29 cells. Thus, miR-19-5p could be used as biomarkers of CRC, with potential implications for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Remin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hesheng Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Remin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Battaglin F, Dadduzio V, Bergamo F, Manai C, Schirripa M, Lonardi S, Zagonel V, Loupakis F. Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an overview of current practice and future perspectives. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2017; 17:1297-1308. [PMID: 28752777 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1356815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted agents alone or in combination with chemotherapy are current standard of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody which inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). It is currently approved in combination with chemotherapy in first- and second-line and as a monotherapy in chemorefractory patients. RAS gene mutations confer resistance to anti-EGFR agents; thus, panitumumab is restricted to the treatment of RAS wild-type (WT) tumors. Areas covered: This review explores the available data on panitumumab and presents new perspectives on predictive markers of anti-EGFR efficacy including primary tumor sidedness and BRAF mutations. Other details covered include panitumumab's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety aspects of the therapy as well as mechanisms of secondary resistance and future prospects of treatment in different settings. Expert opinion: Panitumumab has significantly added to the treatment armamentarium for RAS WT mCRC. The effort spent in identifying predictive biomarkers of panitumumab efficacy has been of pivotal importance to development of the molecular selection of patients with mCRC. Primary and secondary resistance, however, still represent important issues. Novel strategies to overcome those issues are currently underway with promising results which highlight the potential use of panitumumab in combination with other targeted agents in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Battaglin
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Vincenzo Dadduzio
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Francesca Bergamo
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Chiara Manai
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Marta Schirripa
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| | - Fotios Loupakis
- a Clinical and Experimental Oncology Department, Medical Oncology Unit 1 , Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS , Padova , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Arora N, Gupta A, Singh PP. Biological agents in gastrointestinal cancers: adverse effects and their management. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 8:485-498. [PMID: 28736636 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological therapy comprises agents that by virtue of their unique mechanisms of action, are able to specifically incite a response against or target malignant cells. They differ from conventional chemotherapy with regard to mechanisms of action, indications and side effect profile. Biologic agents have revolutionized therapy for a number of malignancies. In the setting of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/Neu) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have proven to be invaluable additions to chemotherapy. However, these agents bring with them a set of side effects attributable to their unique mechanisms of action. The anti VEGF agents-bevacizumab, aflibercept and ramucirumab, can result in renal and vascular complications such as hypertension, arterial thrombotic events (ATE), proteinuria and GI perforations. The anti EGFR agents classically cause dermatological toxicities, in addition to hypomagnesemia, which can be dose limiting for patients. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets Her2/Neu, is known to cause cardiotoxicity, especially when used with anthracyclines. Use of immunotherapy agents such as nivolumab is associated with the development immune related adverse events (irAEs). The use of these agents is expected to increase over the next few years and it is crucial that patients and practitioners are aware of their adverse effects and current management strategies. This review highlights the adverse events associated with the use of biologic and immunologic therapies in GI cancers, their incidence and current management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nivedita Arora
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Arjun Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Preet Paul Singh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Springfield Clinic Cancer Center, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Management of adverse events during treatment of gastrointestinal cancers with epidermal growth factor inhibitors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017; 114:102-113. [PMID: 28477738 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is involved in development and progression of some gastrointestinal cancers, and is targeted by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat these conditions. Targeted agents are generally better tolerated than conventional chemotherapy, but have characteristic toxicities that can affect adherence, dosing, and outcomes. Skin conditions are the most common toxicities associated with EGFR inhibitors, particularly papulopustular rash. Other common toxicities include mucosal toxicity, electrolyte imbalances (notably hypomagnesaemia), and diarrhoea, while the chimaeric mAb cetuximab is also associated with increased risk of infusion reactions. With appropriate prophylaxis, the incidence and severity of these events can be reduced, while management strategies tailored to the patient and the degree of toxicity can help to ensure continuation of anti-cancer therapy. Here, we review the main toxicities associated with EGFR-inhibiting mAbs and TKIs in patients with gastrointestinal cancers, and provide recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pikija S, Pilz G, Gschwandtner G, Rösler C, Schlick K, Greil R, Sellner J. Panitumumab-Associated Encephalopathy after Accidental Intra-arterial Application through Dislocated Central Venous Access Device. Front Neurol 2016; 7:196. [PMID: 27872609 PMCID: PMC5098172 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and immune-related side effects are increasingly recognized with the use of monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy. Here, we report a patient who developed of acute-onset encephalopathy and coma, which began shortly after administration of panitumumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Echocardiography revealed that the drug had been infused into the left cardiac ventricle via a dislocated central venous line. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging disclosed multiple cortical hyperintensities, which were preferentially located in the frontal lobes. While the neurological condition improved within a few days, the patient died 4 weeks later. It seems likely that the administration of the antibody via the intra-arterial route contributed to the development of this condition. Toxic encephalopathy may be a hitherto unrecognized complication of panitumumab treatment and should be taken into consideration in patients developing CNS symptoms undergoing this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slaven Pikija
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria
| | - Georg Pilz
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria
| | - Gerald Gschwandtner
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria
| | - Cornelia Rösler
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria
| | - Konstantin Schlick
- Laboratory of Immunological Molecular Cancer Research, Department of Internal Medicine III with Hematology, Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Laboratory of Immunological Molecular Cancer Research, Department of Internal Medicine III with Hematology, Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria
| | - Johann Sellner
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|