Effect of Ankle Mobility and Segment Ratios on Trunk Lean in the Barbell Back Squat

Knee flexion range of motion does not influence muscle hypertrophy of the quadriceps femoris during leg press training in resistance-trained individuals

This study investigated the effect of knee flexion range of motion (ROM) during the leg press exercise on quadriceps femoris muscle hypertrophy in resistance-trained individuals. Twenty-three participants (training age: 7.2 ± 3.5 years) completed a within-participant design, performing four sets of unilateral leg presses to momentary failure twice weekly for 8 weeks. In one leg, the knee flexion range of motion (ROM) was fixed at approximately 5-100°, while for the other leg, participants used their maximum individualized ROM (5-154 ± 7.8°). Quadriceps muscle thickness was assessed via B-mode ultrasonography in the proximal, central, and distal regions of the mid- and lateral thighs. Bayesian analyses were conducted to quantify treatment effects and provide inferential estimates using credible intervals and Bayes Factors (BF). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated 'moderate' (BF = 0.14 to 0.22) and 'extreme' (BF < 0.01) evidence in support of the null hypothesis, respectively. Within-condition analyses revealed small-to-medium hypertrophic adaptation in both conditions, with absolute increases ranging from 1.08 mm to 1.91 mm. These findings suggest that both knee flexion ROMs are similarly effective for promoting quadriceps femoris muscle hypertrophy over a relatively short training-period in resistance-trained individuals.

Are Anthropometric Measures, Range of Motion, or Movement Control Tests Associated with Lumbopelvic Flexion during Barbell Back Squats?

Background

Resistance training with the barbell back squat (BBS) exercise is practiced in sports, recreation, and rehabilitation. Although extensively debated, it is commonly believed and recommended that maintaining a neutral lumbopelvic alignment during BBS is an important technical aspect that might reduce the risk of injury. There is limited knowledge of how objectively measurable factors affect the extent to which the lumbopelvic region moves into flexion during a BBS.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to investigate the association among anthropometric measurements, range of motion in the hips and ankle joints, lumbopelvic movement control tests, and flexion of the lumbopelvic region during execution of the BBS.

Study design

Observational, cross sectional.

Methods

Eighteen experienced powerlifters and Olympic weightlifters were included and measurements of lumbopelvic movements were collected with inertial measurement units during BBS performed at 70 % of 1RM. Examination of anthropometric properties, range of motion in the hip and ankle joints, and lumbopelvic movement control tests were collected as independent variables. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate which independent variables were associated with lumbopelvic flexion during a BBS.

Results

The linear regression showed that a higher range of motion in ankle dorsiflexion could statistically significantly explain an increased amplitude of lumbopelvic flexion during the BBS. Anthropometrics, range of motion of the hips, and performance in lumbopelvic movement control tests did not show any statistically significant associations.

Conclusions

The results suggest that strength and conditioning professionals and clinicians who instruct and assess lifting technique in the BBS and/or use the BBS to assess performance or as an intervention should recognize that a higher range of motion in the ankle joints might affect lumbopelvic flexion during the BBS. In practice, the value of an individual assessment of lifting technique focusing on the goal of the movement should be emphasized.

Level of Evidence

3.

Can we enable individuals to reach further down without rounding their backs before beginning a lift? Examining the influence of starting foot and trunk position on reach depth

There is disagreement regarding the efficacy of 'safe' lifting recommendations for reducing low back disorder risk. These recommendations commonly focus on minimising lumbar spine flexion, which limits the range of allowable starting lift positions for that person. This study evaluated whether starting postural adaptations could allow a person to reach down further without rounding their lumbar spine before beginning a lift. Reach displacement was measured as participants performed a series of maximal reach tasks under different combinations of stance width, foot orientation and trunk inclination, with their lumbar spine motion restricted. There were no interactions between any of the three postural adaptations or any effect of stance width or trunk inclination. Seventy-nine percent of participants achieved their greatest reach displacement with their feet externally rotated, which contributed to a 4 cm greater reach displacement compared to a neutral foot orientation (p < 0.001).Practitioner summary: This study examined whether aspects of initial posture could influence the ability to adhere to 'safe' lifting recommendations across a range of lift heights. As a component of lifting (re)training interventions, practitioners should consider starting lift posture adaptations (e.g. manipulating foot external rotation) to improve capacity to adhere to recommendations.

Relationship among the COM Motion, the Lower Extremity and the Trunk during the Squat

Squatting is a common motion in activities of daily living and is frequently used in training programs. Squatting requires a shift of the body in both vertical and anterior-posterior directions. Postural control during squatting is considered a mixed strategy; however, details and roles of the trunk and lower limb joints are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among the kinematics of the lower limb, the trunk and the center of mass (COM) descent during squatting. Twenty-six healthy young adults performed repeated parallel squats. Lower limb joint and trunk angles and the COM were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. We evaluated the relationship between the kinematics and the squat depth by performing correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The ankle was the first to reach its maximum angle, and the remaining joints reached their maximum angles at the maximum squat depth. The knee joint motion and the squat depth were significantly correlated and there was a correlation between the hip and the ankle joint motion and the anteroposterior displacement of the COM during squatting. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that squat depth was predicted by both the knee and ankle motion and that anteroposterior displacement of the COM was predicted by the hip, ankle, and knee joint motion. The knees contributed to the vertical COM motion during squatting, while the hips contributed to the COM motion in the anteroposterior direction. On the other hand, the ankles contributed to COM motions in both the vertical and anteroposterior directions during squatting.

Kinematic adaptations to restricting spine motion during symmetrical lifting

When lifting an object from the ground a person has many possible whole-body movement solutions to accomplish the task. It is unclear why lifters use most of their available lumbar spine flexion range-of-motion despite many ergonomic guidelines advising against doing so. Experimentally restricting spine motion and observing compensatory movement strategies is one approach to address this knowledge gap. A kinematic analysis was performed on 16 participants who completed symmetrical lifting tasks with and without wearing a spine motion-restricting device. Sagittal trunk, lumbar spine, and lower extremity kinematics, along with stance width and foot orientation in the transverse plane were evaluated between restricted and unrestricted lifting conditions. Restricting spine motion required greater ankle dorsiflexion (p < 0.001), knee flexion (p < 0.001), and hip flexion (p < 0.001) motion in comparison to unrestricted lifting. Motion was reallocated such that hip flexion showed the largest increase in restricted lifting, followed by ankle dorsiflexion, then knee flexion compared to unrestricted lifting. Trunk inclination decreased (i.e., more upright) in restricted compared to unrestricted lifting (p < 0.001). Neither stance width (p = 0.163) nor foot orientation (p = 0.228) were affected by restricting spine motion. These adaptive movements observed indicate lower extremity joint motion must be available and controlled to minimize lumbar spine flexion during lifting.

The effect of increasing heel height on lower limb symmetry during the back squat in trained and novice lifters

Background

Symmetry during lifting is considered critical for allowing balanced power production and avoidance of injury. This investigation assessed the influence of elevating the heels on bilateral lower limb symmetry during loaded (50% of body weight) high-bar back squats.

Methods

Ten novice (mass 67.6 ± 12.4 kg, height 1.73 ± 0.10 m) and ten regular weight trainers (mass 66.0 ± 10.7 kg, height 1.71 ± 0.09 m) were assessed while standing on both the flat level floor and on an inclined board. Data collection used infra-red motion capture procedures and two force platforms to record bilateral vertical ground reaction force (GRF_vert) and ankle, knee and hip joint kinematic and kinetic data. Paired t-tests and statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) procedures were used to assess differences in discrete and continuous bilateral symmetry data across conditions.

Results

Although discrete joint kinematic and joint moment symmetry data were largely unaffected by raising the heels, the regular weight trainers presented greater bilateral asymmetry in these data than the novices. The one significant finding in these discrete data showed that raising the heels significantly reduced maximum knee extension moment asymmetry (P = 0.02), but in the novice group only. Time-series analyses indicated significant bilateral asymmetries in both GRF_vert and knee extension moments mid-way though the eccentric phase for the novice group, with the latter unaffected by heel lift condition. There were no significant bilateral asymmetries in time series data within the regular weight training group.

Conclusions

This investigation highlights that although a degree of bilateral lower limb asymmetry is common in individuals performing back squats, the degree of this symmetry is largely unaffected by raising the heels. Differences in results for discrete and time-series symmetry analyses also highlight a key issue associated with relying solely on discrete data techniques to assess bilateral symmetry during tasks such as the back squat.

The effect of elevating the heels on spinal kinematics and kinetics during the back squat in trained and novice weight trainers

This research assessed the influence of various heel elevation conditions on spinal kinematic and kinetic data during loaded (25% and 50% of body weight) high-bar back squats. Ten novice (mass 67.6 ± 12.4 kg, height 1.73 ± 0.10 m) and ten regular weight trainers (mass 66.0 ± 10.7 kg, height 1.71 ± 0.09 m) completed eight repetitions at each load wearing conventional training shoes standing on the flat level floor (LF) and on an inclined board (EH). The regular weight training group performed an additional eight repetitions wearing weightlifting shoes (WS). Statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to assess differences in spinal curvature and kinetics across the shoe/floor conditions and loads. SPM1D analyses indicated that during the LF condition the novice weight trainers had greater moments around L4/L5 than the regular weight trainers during the last 20% of the lift (P < 0.05), with this difference becoming non-significant during the EH condition. This study indicates that from a perspective of spinal safety, it appears advantageous for novice weight trainers to perform back squats with their heels slightly elevated, while regular weight trainers appear to realize only limited benefits performing back squats with either EH or WS.

Hand reach star excursion balance test: An alternative test for dynamic postural control and functional mobility

Tests of dynamic postural control eliciting full-body three-dimensional joint movements in a systematic manner are scarce. The well-established star excursion balance test (SEBT) elicits primarily three-dimensional lower extremity joint movements with minimal trunk and no upper extremity joint movements. In response to these shortcomings we created the hand reach star excursion balance test (HSEBT) based on the SEBT reach directions. The aims of the current study were to 1) compare HSEBT and SEBT measurements, 2) compare joint movements elicited by the HSEBT to both SEBT joint movements and normative range of motion values published in the literature. Ten SEBT and HSEBT reaches for each foot were obtained while capturing full-body kinematics in twenty recreationally active healthy male subjects. HSEBT and SEBT areas and composite scores (sum of reaches) for total, anterior and posterior subsections and individual reaches were correlated. Total reach score comparisons showed fair to moderate correlations (r = .393 to .606), while anterior and posterior subsections comparisons had fair to good correlations (r = .269 to .823). Individual reach comparisons had no to good correlations (r = -.182 to .822) where lateral and posterior reaches demonstrated the lowest correlations (r = -.182 to .510). The HSEBT elicited more and significantly greater joint movements than the SEBT, except for hip external rotation, knee extension and plantarflexion. Comparisons to normative range of motion values showed that 3 of 18 for the SEBT and 8 of 22 joint movements for the HSEBT were within normative values. The findings suggest that the HSEBT can be used for the assessment of dynamic postural control and is particularly suitable for examining full-body functional mobility.