The effect of back squat depth and load on lower body muscle activity in group exercise participants

Les Mills BODYPUMPTM is a resistance training group exercise class with a low load, high repetition format. Squat training in BODYPUMPTM has two key variables: depth and load. The study aim was to determine the effect of these parameters on the mean and peak EMG amplitude of vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris and lateral gastrocnemius. Ten female BODYPUMPTM participants (age 41 ± 9 years, height 161.9 ± 3.8 cm, mass 67.7 ± 7.0 kg) performed 1 × 7 squats under four conditions, representing every combination of two depths (90° knee angle and 125° knee angle) and two loads (23% bodyweight and 38% bodyweight). The main effect of depth was significant for mean and peak activity of vastus lateralis and gluteus maximus, and peak activity of biceps femoris and lateral gastrocnemius. The main effect of load was significant for mean and peak activity of gluteus maximus and lateral gastrocnemius. There was no depth * load interaction. These data can be used to inform BODYPUMPTM programme design and amplify the training effect of participation in group exercise classes.

Support moment distribution during the back squat at different depths and loads in recreationally trained females

OBJECTIVES

The squat is used in athletic and clinical settings. However, the coordination of the lower extremity during the lift is not well understood. The purpose was to compare the peak moments of the lower extremity joints at three squat depths (above parallel, parallel and full) and three squat loads (unloaded, 50 % 1 repetition maximum, and 85 % of depth specific 1 repetition maximum) and find their contribution to support (Ms).

DESIGN

Nineteen females performed squats in a randomized order.

METHODS

Inverse dynamics and Winter's Ms equation were used to calculate peak moments of the hip, knee and ankle and calculate their contribution to Ms (α < 0.05).

RESULTS

Peak hip and ankle extensor moments varied with load but not depth and were greatest when using 85 % 1 repetition maximum. Peak knee extensor moments demonstrated a depth by load interaction. Within each depth as load increased so too did peak knee extensor moments and were highest squatting below parallel when loaded. The hip and knee contribution to Ms demonstrated a depth by load interaction while the ankle was only influenced by load. Within each depth as load increased hip contribution increased whereas the knee decreased contribution. When squatting with load the contribution of the hip decreased at below parallel while the knee increased.

CONCLUSIONS

To maximize peak hip moments squat with high load and to maximize peak knee moments squat deep with high load; however, depth and load dosages should be taken into consideration based on the status and goals of the individual.

Individual Muscle Contributions to the Acceleration of the Center of Mass During the Barbell Back Squat in Trained Female Subjects

ABSTRACT

Goodman, WW, Helms, E, and Graham, DF. Individual muscle contributions to the acceleration of the center of mass during the barbell back squat in trained female subjects. J Strength Cond Res 37(10): 1947-1954, 2023-The squat is used to enhance performance and rehabilitate the lower body. However, muscle forces and how muscles accelerate the center of mass (CoM) are not well understood. The purpose was to determine how lower extremity muscles contribute to the vertical acceleration of the CoM when squatting to parallel using 85% one-repetition maximum. Thirteen female subjects performed squats in a randomized fashion. Musculoskeletal modeling was used to obtain muscle forces and muscle-induced accelerations. The vasti, soleus, and gluteus maximus generated the largest upward accelerations of the CoM, whereas the muscles that produced the largest downward acceleration about the CoM were the hamstrings, iliopsoas, adductors, and tibialis anterior. Our findings indicate that a muscle's function is task and posture specific. That is, muscle function depends on both joint position and how an individual is interacting with the environment.

Effects of progressive body-weight versus barbell back squat training on strength, hypertrophy and body fat among sedentary young women

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of progressive bodyweight training and barbell back squat on muscle strength, muscluar hypertrophy, and body fat percentage in sedentary young women. Thirteen sedentary young women (aged 19.77 ± 0.83 years, height 164.91 ± 6.01) were randomly assigned to either the progressive bodyweight group (n = 6, consisting of 10 levels of movements progressing from bilateral to unilateral) or the barbell squat group (n = 7, 60-80% 1RM). Both groups underwent two training sessions per week for 6 weeks. Measurements of muscle strength (isokinetic knee extensor and flexor muscle peak torque of each leg), muscle thickness (gluteus maximus, rectus femoris, and gastrocnemius muscles), and body fat percentage were taken at baseline and post-testing. Both groups showed a significant increase in isometric peak torque of the knee extensor and flexor (p < 0.05), but there were no significant between-group differences in isometric peak torque of the knee extensor and flexor (p > 0.05) or in the mean concentric peak torque of the knee H/Q ratio (p > 0.05). Both groups also showed significant increases in muscle thickness (p < 0.05), with no significant differences in Gastrocnemius, Rectus femoris and Gluteus maximus (p > 0.05). The percentage of body fat significantly decreased in the barbell group (pre: 28.66 ± 4.58% vs post: 24.96 ± 5.91%, p = 0.044), but not in the bodyweight group (pre: 24.18 ± 4.63% vs post: 24.02 ± 4.48%, p = 0.679). Our findings indicate that while both training methods increased maximum strength and muscle mass, barbell back squat training may be more effective in reducing body fat percentage.

Greater Hip Moments in Rear-Foot-Elevated Split Squats Than in Conventional Back Squats With the Same Relative Intensity of Loads

ABSTRACT

Arakawa, H, Mori, M, and Tanimoto, M. Greater hip moments in rear-foot-elevated split squats than in conventional back squats with the same relative intensity of loads. J Strength Cond Res 37(5): 1009-1016, 2023-Rear-foot-elevated split squat (RFESS) is often performed as an alternative to conventional double-leg back squat (DLBS). This study aimed to compare 3-dimensional joint kinetics of DLBS and RFESS using the same relative intensity of loads. Eight male college rugby players performed 3 repetitions of DLBS and RFESS at 10-repetition-maximum (RM) loading. Before testing, both exercises were incorporated into the subjects' training program with a progressive increase in loads for 4 months. A 3-dimensional optical motion capture system and force platform were used for data collection. The 3-dimensional moments at the knee and hip joints in each of the 3 axes were calculated based on the inverse dynamic procedure. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The hip extension moment was 44% greater in the RFESS than in the DLBS at the bottom position ( p < 0.01) and 47% greater for the peak value ( p < 0.01) on harmonic averages. The hip abduction and external rotation moments at the bottom position were also greater in the RFESS than in the DLBS. The findings suggest that the magnitude of hip extension moment per leg in DLBS tends to be restricted to less than that expected from the given strength level. In conclusion, the mechanical contribution of hip extensors per leg can be greater in RFESS than in DLBS when using respective 10RM loads, even if the absolute load is smaller and the trunk is more upright in RFESS.

Novice Female Exercisers Exhibited Different Biomechanical Loading Profiles during Full-Squat and Half-Squat Practice

Simple Summary

This study adapted a customized OpenSim model aiming to analyze the loadings difference between full-squat and half-squat in novice females. The joint moment and joint angle of the hip, knee, and ankle increase significantly in the full-squat, which might increase the risks of potential injury. In the case of training, the cohort of young females could perform half-squat practice when muscle strength is insufficient. This study may present implications for the design of novice strength training programs and the formulation of rehabilitation plans.

Abstract

Background: Females with different practice experience may show different body postures and movement patterns while squatting in different depths, which may lead to changes of biomechanical loadings and increase the risks of injuries. Methods: Sixteen novice female participants without squat training experience participated in this study. A 3D motion capture system was used to collect the marker trajectory and ground reaction force data during bodyweight squatting in different depths. The participants’ kinematic data and joint moment were calculated using OpenSim’s inverse kinematics and inverse dynamics algorithm. In this study, authors adapted a model especially developed for squatting and customized the knee joint with extra Degree-of-Freedom (DoF) in the coronal and horizontal plane with adduction/abduction and internal/external rotation. A paired-sample t-test was used to analyze the difference of joint range of motions (ROM) and peak moments between full-squat (F-SQ) and half-squat (H-SQ). One-Dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM1D) is used to analyze the difference of joint angle and moment between the process of squatting F-SQ and H-SQ. Results: (1) Compared with H-SQ, F-SQ showed larger ROM in sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes (p < 0.05). (2) SPM1D found that the difference in joint angles and joint moments between F-SQ and H-SQ was mainly concentrated in the mid-stance during squatting, which suggested the difference is greatly pronounced during deeper squat. (3) Peak hip extension moment, knee extension moment, hip adduction moment, and plantar flexion moment of F-SQ were significantly higher than H-SQ (p < 0.05). (4) Difference of hip and knee extension moments and rotation moments between the F-SQ and H-SQ were exhibited during descending and ascending. Conclusions: The study found that novice women had larger range of joint motion during the F-SQ than H-SQ group, and knee valgus was observed during squatting to the deepest point. Greater joint moment was found during F-SQ and reached a peak during ascending after squatting to the deepest point. Novice women may have better movement control during H-SQ. The findings may provide implications for the selection of lower limb strength training programs, assist the scientific development of training movements, and provide reference for squat movement correction, thus reducing the risk of injury for novice women in squatting practice.

Patellofemoral joint kinetics in females when using different depths and loads during the barbell back squat

Back squats are a common strengthening exercise for knee and hip musculature. However, repetitive loaded movements like backs squats result in high patellofemoral joint loading and therefore may contribute to the development of common overuse injuries. Thus, it is important to understand how changing parameters such as squat depth or load influences patellofemoral loading. This study investigated differences in patellofemoral loading when experienced female lifters squatted to three depths (above parallel, parallel, and below parallel) and with three loads (unloaded, 50%, and 85% of depth-specific one repetition maximums). Patellofemoral joint reaction forces (pfJRF) and stresses (pfJS) were calculated from biomechanical models incorporating knee extensor moments (KEM) and joint angles. Peak KEMs displayed a depth-by-load interaction such that within each depth, as load increased so did peak KEM. However, within each load, the effects of depth were different. Peak pfJRF also increased with load and was higher at below parallel than above or parallel depths. Peak pfJS also displayed a depth-by-load interaction, increasing with load within a given depth, and being greatest at the below parallel depths within a given load. If patellofemoral joint loading is a concern, clinicians or coaches should carefully monitor the depth and load combinations being used.