The impact of neuroticism upon married bipolar patients

Phenomenological predictors of psychosocial function in bipolar disorder: is there evidence that social cognitive and emotion regulation abnormalities contribute?

OBJECTIVES

Neurocognitive ability and mood have often been discussed as contributing mechanisms to the severe psychosocial dysfunction experienced in bipolar disorder (BD). In contrast, there has been little discussion on the contribution of social cognition or emotion regulation. This paper aims to assert a potential role for these constructs in psychosocial functioning in BD, with an overarching goal to highlight the necessary importance of considering them in future research examining psychosocial outcomes in the disorder.

METHODS

This paper provides a theoretical synthesis of available and indirect evidence for an influence of (1) social cognition and (2) emotion regulation on psychosocial functioning; it acknowledges important clinical questions that need addressing, and discusses how current research might be translated to improve the treatment of psychosocial dysfunction in BD.

RESULTS

Given their assumed roles in facilitating social interactions and modulating behaviours, it is certainly plausible that abnormalities in social cognition and emotion regulation are detrimental to psychosocial functioning. Currently, there is only minimal direct evidence examining their influence, although existing BD studies are preliminarily supportive of relationships between these constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

There are reasonable theoretical grounds, supported by indirect and preliminary evidence, to suggest that social cognition and emotion regulation may be important in the prediction of psychosocial outcome in BD. However, this proposition is limited by the paucity of empirical research directly examining this matter.

Personality traits and affective morbidity in patients with bipolar I disorder: the five-factor model perspective

In this study, we aimed to extend the present knowledge regarding the relationship of personality traits, as specified by the five-factor model (FFM), with the affective morbidity of bipolar I disorder. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the association of personality traits with affective morbidity, particularly with hospitalization for depressive, manic, or mixed episodes, in patients with bipolar I disorder. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory was administered to 83 subjects who showed a euthymic mood state. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify associations between five domains of personality and the number of hospitalizations for affective episode(s) (manic, depressive, and mixed state). As a secondary research interest, we attempted to determine personality traits which would be significantly different between subjects with Affective Switch from mania into depression Without Euthymia (ASWE) and non-ASWE. The Neuroticism score was positively associated with the number of hospitalization for depression and the total number of hospitalizations Extraversion and Openness scores showed a negative relationship with the number of hospitalizations for depression and the total number of hospitalizations. We found that ASWE patients showed significantly higher Neuroticism scores than did the non-ASWE group. However, there was no significant association between the hospitalization for manic episode and any particular personality trait based on the FFM. This study reveals that personality traits based on the FFM may contribute to an increased likelihood of depressive morbidity and switch into depression.

Differences in neuroticism and extraversion between patients with bipolar I or II and general population subjects or major depressive disorder patients

BACKGROUND

Whether levels of neuroticism or extraversion differ between patients with bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD) and subjects from the general population, or between BD I and BD II patients, remains unclear.

METHODS

BD patients (n=191) from the Jorvi Bipolar Study, and MDD patients (n=358) from both the Vantaa Depression Study and the Vantaa Primary Care Depression Study cohorts, were interviewed at baseline and at 18 months. A general population comparison group (n=347) was surveyed by mail. BD patients' neuroticism and extraversion scores, measured by Eysenck Personality Inventory, were compared at an index interview, when the levels of depression and mania were lowest, with scores of MDD patients and general population controls. Comparisons were also made between BD I (n=99) and BD II (n=92) patients.

RESULTS

In multinomial logistic regression, BD patients had higher neuroticism (OR=1.17, p<0.001) and lower extraversion (OR=0.92, p=0.003) than the general population. When entered simultaneously into the model, the effect of extraversion disappeared. In logistic regression, the levels of neuroticism and extraversion did not differ between BD and MDD patients, or between BD I and II patients.

LIMITATIONS

Patients' personality scores were not pre-morbid.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of neuroticism and extraversion are unlikely to differ between BD and MDD patients, or between BD I and II patients. The overall level of neuroticism is moderately higher and extraversion somewhat lower in BD patients than in the general population. High neuroticism may be an indicator of vulnerability to both bipolar and unipolar mood disorders.

Determinants of social functioning in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Evidence indicates that social outcomes in bipolar disorders (BP) are poorer than previously assumed. This study explores determinants of the quality and quantity of social activity.

METHODS

Seventy-seven subjects with BP completed self-report and observer-rated questionnaires assessing demographic and clinical factors, personality and social functioning.

RESULTS

Quality of functioning and spectrum of activity were found to be independent. The best determinants of the quality of functioning, accounting for 33% of the variance, were premorbid neuroticism and the current level of depressive symptoms. Only 30% of subjects were active in all social domains, and the quantity of social activity was largely explained by social circumstances, namely, living with someone else and later age of illness onset.

CONCLUSIONS

The implications of these findings are discussed in this paper. We suggest that future studies need to differentiate between factors associated with the quality of functioning as compared with the quantity of social activity.

Comparisons of perceived quality of life across clinical states in bipolar disorder: data from the first 2000 Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) participants

BACKGROUND

Evidence indicates that quality of life is subnormal in patients with bipolar disorder and that it differs across mood states. However, the pattern of specific deficits has not been well studied, and the role of potential confounders has received no attention.

METHOD

We investigated the self-reported quality of life, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction (QLESQ) at baseline across the clinical states of the first 2000 participants enrolled in Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder.

RESULTS

Bivariate analyses indicated significant differences across mood state, with depressive symptoms predicting lower SF-36 mental and physical scores and QLESQ overall score. However, adjustment for relevant clinical and demographic variables erased the difference in the SF-36 physical score. Notably, covariate adjustment removed the apparently "supranormal" SF-36 mental and QLESQ scores among those with mania/hypomania compared with those euthymic.

CONCLUSION

Depressive symptoms are a strong predictor of quality of life, yet covariate adjustment has an impact as well. Clinically, this indicates the need for addressing these factors if quality of life is to be maximized. Such factors should also be taken into account in future naturalistic and clinical trials research on quality of life in bipolar disorder.

XBP1 gene polymorphism (-116C/G) and personality

Recently, a polymorphism of the XBP1 gene (-116 C/G) was observed to play a significant role in the development of bipolar mood disorder from the Japanese population. The present study investigated a role of the polymorphism in the development of personality in healthy Japanese volunteers (n = 195). Personality traits were evaluated using NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R). As a result, a statistical trend for association between the polymorphism (genotype) and the NEO PI-R scores of agreeableness and neuroticism was observed (ANOVA, P = 0.01 and 0.006, respectively). Subjects with the G allele, especially those with G-G genotype, tended to show lower neuroticism and higher agreeableness in the present study. The result is provisional and should be interpreted with caution, partly because the previous study suggested the allele as a risk allele for bipolar disorder. Further studies are required to confirm the results.

The impact of high neuroticism in parents on children's psychosocial functioning in a population at high risk for major affective disorder: a family-environmental pathway of intergenerational risk

Behavioral genetic studies indicate that nongenetic factors play a role in the development of bipolar and major depressive disorders. The trait of neuroticism is common among individuals with major affective disorders. We hypothesized that high neuroticism among parents affects the family environment and parenting practices and thereby increases the risk of psychosocial problems among offspring. This hypothesis is tested in a sample of participants at high and low risk for major affective disorders, which contained parents with bipolar disorder (55), major depression (21), or no mental disorder (148) and their 146 children between 4 and 14 years of age. Parents with high neuroticism scores were characterized by low psychosocial functioning, poor parenting, more dependent stressful life events, and the use of more emotion-focused and less task-oriented coping skills. High neuroticism in parents was associated with internalizing and externalizing problems among the children, as assessed by parent and teacher ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist and clinician ratings. The results suggest that high neuroticism in parents with major affective disorders is associated with inadequate parenting practices and the creation of a stressful family environment, which are subsequently related to psychosocial problems among the offspring.