Combined treatment with growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency

Short stature in a patient with familial glucocorticoid deficiency

A 10.5-year-old Caucasian girl with familial glucocorticoid deficiency (FGD) is presented. She had a homozygous S74I mutation of the ACTH receptor and her parents were heterozygous for the same mutation. Around 4 years prior to the diagnosis of FGD, she was diagnosed with antibody positive primary hypothyroidism and was on thyroxin supplementation. FGD patients are considered to be tall. Our patient was only 146.5 cm (4' 9.25") tall at age 17 years (-2.21 standard deviations below the mean for her age). The possible mechanism for short stature in FGD is speculated.

Phenotypic analysis and growth response to different growth hormone treatment schedules in two siblings with an inactivating mutation in the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor gene

Mutations in the GHRH receptor (GHRHR) gene (GHRHR) are emerging as a common cause of familial isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) type IB. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues has been advocated as a tool to delay puberty in patients with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD), allowing longer time for the beneficial effect of exogenous human GH (hGH) treatment on growth. We describe two male siblings with IGHD due to a homozygous missense GHRHR mutation who, because they were started on hGH therapy at different ages, presented with different height SDS at the onset of puberty and therefore had different predicted target heights. The shorter brother was treated with GnRH analogue plus hGH for 3 years, whereas the other brother received only hGH. Despite different predicted heights at the onset of puberty, they attained similar final heights. We conclude that in patients with IGHD, GnRH analogue treatment should be considered to delay puberty and obtain a maximal growth response if hGH treatment is started in late childhood and the predicted height at puberty onset is below the genetic target.

Can some growth hormone (GH)-deficient children benefit from combined therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and GH? Results of a retrospective study

Recombinant GH (rGH) treatment does not invariably correct height deficits in GH-deficient children once puberty has begun. The addition of GnRH analogs (GnRHa) to delay puberty has been advocated, but published results are few and sometimes conflicting. We retrospectively compared GH-deficient children treated with rGH and GnRHa for at least 1 yr after entering puberty and having attained their final height (n = 23) with a matched control group treated only with rGH. Overall, combined therapy did not significantly increase final height relative to rGH alone. However, the shortest girls at the onset of puberty (<25th percentile) benefited more than the tallest (>75th percentile) in both final height relative to predicted height and pubertal catch-up growth. In the control group, patients having experienced intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) attained a lower mean final height than patients without IUGR (difference significant in boys, but not in girls). In the combined therapy group, IUGR did not affect the final height of either sex. Our results suggest that two populations might benefit most from combined GnRHa and rGH therapy: girls particularly short at the onset of puberty and patients who had experienced IUGR. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these preliminary hypothesis.

Evaluation and treatment of low bone density in anorexia nervosa

The prevalence of anorexia nervosa has increased in recent years, and a large proportion of adults as well as adolescents with this disorder have low bone density and, therefore, an increased risk of fractures. Anorexia nervosa often begins during adolescence, when peak bone mass is accumulated, resulting in significant deficits in bone mass accrual. Therefore, it is important to determine bone mineral density in adolescent and adult women who have this disorder, and to improve or at least stabilize bone metabolism in those with low bone mass. To do this, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying low bone density in anorexia nervosa. This article discusses current concepts related to bone loss associated with anorexia nervosa, including how to prevent it.

The use of somatropin (recombinant growth hormone) in children of short stature

The availability of somatropin [recombinant human growth hormone (GH)] has revolutionized the treatment of short stature resulting from GH deficiency. It is also widely used as an adjunct in the treatment of other disorders which do not fit the definition of classic GH deficiency, such as intrauterine growth restriction, Turner syndrome, healthy children with short stature and skeletal dysplasias. The widespread use and ready availability of GH treatment has prompted questions about its tolerability, rationality, and the psychological effects of long-term treatment, leading to several trials. Early treatment of GH deficiency will allow the child to reach his or her genetic potential, although there continues to be marked variability in the criteria used to diagnose the deficiency, and in the treatment schedule, especially during puberty. Treatment has also been shown to have a beneficial effect on growth in children with chronic renal failure, with no adverse effects on the renal function. There are, however, no long-term data to determine final height, or randomized controlled studies to justify routine use of GH in conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction. It remains controversial in conditions such as Turner syndrome and achondroplasia, where the response to treatment is only moderate. Healthy children with short stature have not been shown to have a psychological disadvantage, again proving difficult to justify prolonged GH treatment for idiopathic short stature. Meticulous monitoring, long-term follow-up to adult or near-adult final height, and well-defined endpoints of treatment need to be better clarified. The metabolic effects of treatment on the patient's lipid profile, bone mineral density, and muscle mass need careful documentation, especially with the high doses used in an already susceptible population such as low birthweight children and those with Turner syndrome. Lastly, the psychosocial impact of GH treatment, financial implications, and cost efficacy of treatment in an ever-increasing list of indications should be taken into consideration for rationalizing its use in future.

Optimizing gh therapy in adults and children

Until the advent of modern neuroradiological imaging techniques in 1989, a diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults carried little significance other than as a marker of hypothalamo-pituitary disease. The relatively recent recognition of a characteristic clinical syndrome associated with failure of spontaneous GH secretion and the potential reversal of many of its features with recombinant human GH has prompted a closer examination of the physiological role of GH after linear growth is complete. The safe clinical practice of GH replacement demands a method of judging overall GH status, but there is no biological marker in adults that is the equivalent of linear growth in a child by which to judge the efficacy of GH replacement. Assessment of optimal GH replacement is made difficult by the apparent diverse actions of GH in health, concern about the avoidance of iatrogenic acromegaly, and the growing realization that an individual's risk of developing certain cancers may, at least in part, be influenced by cumulative exposure to the chief mediator of GH action, IGF-I. As in all areas of clinical practice, strategies and protocols vary between centers, but most physicians experienced in the management of pituitary disease agree that GH is most appropriately begun at low doses, building up slowly to the final maintenance dose. This, in turn, is best determined by a combination of clinical response and measurement of serum IGF-I, avoiding supraphysiological levels of this GH-dependent peptide. Numerous studies have helped define the optimum management of GH replacement during childhood. The recent requirement to measure and monitor GH status in adult life has called into question the appropriateness of simplistic weight- and surface area-based dosing regimens for the management of GH deficiency in childhood, with reliance on linear growth as the sole marker of GH action. It is clear that the monitoring of parameters other than linear growth to help refine GH therapy should now be incorporated into childhood GH treatment protocols. Further research will be required to define the optimal management of the transition from pediatric to adult GH replacement; this transition will only be possible once the benefits of GH in mature adults are defined and accepted by pediatric and adult endocrinologists alike.

Is there a place for combined therapy with GnRH agonist plus growth hormone in improving final height in short statured children?

The availability of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) and the optimization of substitutive therapy have improved final growth in children with GH deficiency, but despite this some of them fail to grow to their genetic potential. In particular, this may occur in patients who started the substitutive therapy too late and/or in whom bone age progressed too fast during GH administration. In these patients, with unfavorable auxological characteristics, the administration of a GnRH agonist in combination with GH may slow down bone maturation and prolong prepubertal growth, mimicking, to some extent, the growth pattern of patients with GH + Gn deficiency who grow better than children with isolated GHD. A different condition in which such a combined therapy might be used is the short normal child. As they are short but normally-growing children, the onset of puberty is in general appropriate for their chronological age but precocious for their height age. Thus, slowing down pubertal maturation may increase the time available for growth. GH would sustain growth during both GnRHa administration and after its withdrawal, when puberty starts again. Our preliminary results suggest that the administration of GH + GnRHa in combination may have a positive effect on final height in selected children with isolated GHD and in short normal children.

Final height after combined growth hormone and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue therapy in short healthy children entering into normally timed puberty

OBJECTIVE

Combined gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue and recombinant human growth hormone therapy has been used in an attempt to improve the final height of short non-GH deficient adolescents with normally timed puberty; its use, however, is still controversial as only short-term studies in a very limited number of patients have been undertaken, with either improvement in height prognosis or no beneficial effect on predicted growth. We have treated a group of extremely short healthy children with very low predicted adult heights entering into normally timed puberty with combined therapy, in order to determine whether we could improve their final height above their pretreatment predicted adult height.

PATIENTS

We treated 10 healthy adolescent short children (7 girls and 3 boys) simultaneously for 30.0 +/- 5.2 months with the GnRH analogue leuprolide acetate (0.3 mg/kg im every 28 days) and with rhGH (0.1 U/kg/day, sc, 6 days a week). The mean chronological age of our patients was 11.8 +/- 1.3 years, with a mean bone age of 11.2 +/- 0.9 years, height of 128.9 +/- 7.5 cm (-2.4 +/- 0.4 SD below the mean) and a predicted adult height of 150.7 +/- 9.8 cm; they were all in Tanner stage II-III of puberty. Ten healthy short children (7 girls and 3 boys) in the early stages of puberty with a mean chronological age of 11.4 +/- 1.0 years, a mean bone age of 11.0 +/- 0.8 years, height of 128.9 +/- 7.8 cm (-2.3 +/- 0.4 SD below the mean) and a mean adult predicted height of 151.8 +/- 10.1 cm served as controls and were simultaneously followed without therapy for the same study period.

MEASUREMENTS

Height and pubertal status were followed every 3 months during combined therapy and until final height of our patients was reached; bone ages were obtained every 6 months. Growth hormone deficiency was ruled out in all our subjects prior to beginning of the study by a normal response to oral clonidine and normal IGF-1 levels. Basal serum testosterone and/or oestradiol levels, as well as LH and FSH following administration of LH-releasing hormone were obtained before treatment and after 6 weeks and 4 months of combined therapy and every 6 months thereafter. Routine biochemistry as well as thyroid function tests were obtained at each visit.

RESULTS

Combined treatment resulted in an interruption of pubertal development with a suppression of gonadal steroids and of the LH response to LH-releasing hormone. Growth velocity decreased from 6.5 +/- 1.6 cm/year before treatment to 5.5 +/- 1.5 cm/year and 3.9 +/- 1.3 cm/year during the first and second year of treatment (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively) resulting in a height Z score reduction, declining from -2.4 +/- 04 to -2.6 +/- 0.7 SD. Bone age maturation declined averaging 0.75 bone age year/year of treatment but height SDS for bone age declined from -1.7 +/- 0.7 to -2.2 +/- 0.5 at the end of the second year of therapy with no improvement in predicted adult height (150.7 +/- 9.8 cm before and 150.0 +/- 8.0 after 2 years of therapy). After discontinuing treatment growth velocity did not improve and bone maturation advanced more rapidly (averaging 2.0 +/- 0.4 year/year of follow up) and the mean final height of our patients was 151 +/- 2.4 cm (-2.6 +/- 0.6 SD below the mean) which was not greater than the mean pretreatment predicted adult height and well below their target height; these results were also similar to those of the control population in whom the predicted adult height at the beginning of the study and after 2 years of follow up, was not different from their final height and well below their target height.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that combined rhGH and GnRH analogue therapy in short adolescents with normally timed puberty does not contribute to increase their final height above their pretreatment predicted adult height; we can therefore not recommend this form of therapy for this group of patients given the poor results obtained, as well as the cost of these medications and the

Growth and neuroendocrine dysfunction following therapy for childhood cancer

Poor linear growth and short adult stature are common complications following successful treatment of childhood cancer. Although several factors contribute to the impaired growth of these patients, growth potential is most reduced following radiotherapy to the head or spine. Younger age at treatment and female sex seem to be significant and independent risk factors for short adult height. Early diagnosis and timely therapy of the endocrine sequelae of cancer treatment (i.e., GH deficiency, hypothyroidism, and precocious puberty) ensure that these individuals will reach their optimum growth potential. For patients exposed to high-dose radiotherapy (> 35-40 Gy) to the region of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, a variety of neuroendocrine abnormalities in addition to GH deficiency and early sexual development may occur, including deficiencies of LH/FSH, TSH, and ACTH as well as hypersecretion of prolactin. Because these problems may develop many years after irradiation, patients at risk for neuroendocrine disturbances require long-term endocrine follow-up.