Heterophilic antibodies may be a cause of falsely low total IGF1 levels

Discordance of insulin-like growth factor-1 results and interpretation on four different platforms

OBJECTIVE

Inconsistent Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) measurements among different platforms have been observed. In this study, we compared the IGF-1 assay on four different platforms.

METHODS

A total of 110 serum specimens were analyzed in this comparison study. IGF-1 was measured on the three different chemiluminescent automated immunoassay of Siemens Immulite 2000 XPi, DiaSorin Liaison XL, IDS iSYS and LC-MS/MS method. Results were compared with Weighted Deming regression. Bias was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

Weighted Deming regression analysis showed approximately 36 % negative variation on Immulite, compared to Liaison (Immulite = 0.64 * DiaSorin + 2.95, r² = 0.95); 8 % negative variation on iSYS, compared to Liaison (iSYS = 0.92 * DiaSorin + 0.51, r² = 0.97); 17 % negative variation on LC-MS/MS, compared to Liaison (LC-MS/MS = 0.83 * DiaSorin-11.23, r² = 0.93); 34 % positive variation on LC-MS/MS compared to Immulite (LC-MS/MS = 1.34 * Immulite-21.97, r² = 0.96); 81 % positive variation on IDS iSYS compared to Immulite (IDS iSYS = 1.81 * Immulite-117.65, r² = 0.83). The Bland-Altman plot showed a significant negative variation of Immulite versus DiaSorin and positive variation of IDS iSYS versus Immulite. Overall agreement between different platforms was poor, which reflected systematic difference. The variation between platforms increased as IGF-1 values increased.

CONCLUSIONS

There are wide variations between different platforms for IGF-1 measurement. The lack of standardization in IGF-1 measurement creates a challenge for clinicians to monitor IGF-1 and treat patients with pituitary disorders, when switching from one platform to another. The potential impact of the variations in IGF-1 measurement between different platforms should be taken into consideration when managing patients.

Hormone Immunoassay Interference: A 2021 Update

Immunoassays are powerful qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques. Since the first description of an immunoassay method in 1959, advances have been made in assay designs and analytical characteristics, opening the door for their widespread implementation in clinical laboratories. Clinical endocrinology is closely linked to laboratory medicine because hormone quantification is important for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of endocrine disorders. Several interferences in immunoassays have been identified through the years; although some are no longer encountered in daily practice, cross-reaction, heterophile antibodies, biotin, and anti-analyte antibodies still cause problems. Newer interferences are also emerging with the development of new therapies. The interfering substance may be exogenous (e.g., a drug or substance absorbed by the patient) or endogenous (e.g., antibodies produced by the patient), and the bias caused by interference can be positive or negative. The consequences of interference can be deleterious when clinicians consider erroneous results to establish a diagnosis, leading to unnecessary explorations or inappropriate treatments. Clinical laboratories and manufacturers continue to investigate methods for the detection, elimination, and prevention of interferences. However, no system is completely devoid of such incidents. In this review, we focus on the analytical interferences encountered in daily practice and possible solutions for their detection or elimination.

The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor stimulating activity (IRSA) in health and disease

Determination of true IGF-I bioactivity in serum and other biological fluids is still a substantial challenge. The IGF-IR Kinase Receptor Activation assay (IGF-IR KIRA assay) is a novel tool to asses IGF-IR stimulating activity (IRSA) and has opened a new era in studying the IGF system. In this paper we discuss many studies showing that measuring IRSA by the IGF-IR KIRA assay often provides fundamentally different information about the IGF system than the commonly used total IGF-I immunoassays. With the IGF-IR KIRA assay phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of the IGF-IR is used as read out to quantify IRSA in unknown (serum) samples. The IGF-IR KIRA assay gives information about net overall effects of circulating IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBPs and IGFBP-proteases on IGF-IR activation and seems especially superior to immunoreactive total IGF-I in monitoring therapeutic interventions. Although the IRSA as measured by the IGF-IR KIRA assay probably more closely reflects true bioactive IGF-I than measurements of total IGF-I in serum, the IGF-IR KIRA assay in its current form does not give information about all the post-receptor intracellular events mediated by the IGF-IR. Interestingly, in several conditions in health and disease IRSA measured by the IGF-IR KIRA assay is considerably higher in interstitial fluid and ascites than in serum. This suggests that both the paracrine (local) and endocrine (circulating) IRSA should be measured to get a complete picture about the role of the IGF system in health and disease.

Insulin like growth factor 1 is linked to higher cardiovascular risk score in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is a peptide that shares sequence homology with insulin and has endocrine, paracrine and autocrine functions, acts on endothelial cells, and stimulates angiogenesis. IGF1 also affects renal hemodynamics both directly and indirectly by interacting with the renin-angiotensin system.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed at detecting a relation between age-adjusted IGF1 (AAIGF1) and cardiovascular risk score in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

DESIGN

Patients were 90 females and 42 males with different stages of CKD ranging from 0 to 4. After taking a consent, serum IGF1 was recorded and adjusted for the age of the patient using the IGF1 score equation: {[(log IGF-1 + 0.00625xage)-2.555]/0.104}. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses of AAIGF1 to different metabolic parameters and microvascular complications of type 2 DM were done. A ROC curve for CV risk score was issued.

RESULTS

AAIGF1 showed a significant bidirectional change with the stage of CKD. Univariate analysis was done including cardiovascular parameters in relations to AAIGF1. A significant positive correlation was found between AAIGF1 and CV risk score (B = 0.036, p = 0.003), SBP (B = 0.030, P = 0.004) and DBP (B = 0.071, P = 0.000), with a reciprocal relation to EF (B = -0.050, P = 0.016). Multivariate regression showed a significant correlation between AAIGF1 and age, HOMAIR, HOMAB, Uric acid. A ROC curve with AUC of 0.675, P = 0.003, showed that AAIGF1 of approximately -1.7 is a cut off for intermediate CV risk (10 year risk score >7.5%).

CONCLUSION

AAIGF1 shows a bidirectional relation to the grade of chronic kidney disease in adults with type 2 DM. A cut off point for AAIGF1 was set to indicate intermediate CV risk score, which can encourage using AAIGF1 as a prognostic marker for higher CV risk score. Medications that modulate IGF1 level can affect CV risk.

Long-term follow-up of patients with elevated IGF-1 and nadir GH > 0.4 µg/L but < 1 µg/L

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of initial investigation and after 5 years of patients with a suspicious clinical scenario for acromegaly, elevated IGF-1, and nadir GH during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) > 0.4 µg/L but < 1 µg/L.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients who had elevated IGF-1 (outside puberty and pregnancy) in two measurements and GH between 0.4 and 1 µg/L during OGTT were selected.

RESULTS

During initial assessment, only one patient had microadenoma on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary. In this patient, IGF-1 returned to normal spontaneously after 5 years. In the remaining 16 patients, spontaneous normalization of IGF-1 was observed in four and IGF-1 continued to be elevated in 12 after 5 years. None of the latter patients developed a phenotype of acromegaly, changes in physiognomy or increase in IGF-1 and no tumor was detected by imaging methods. Two patients had nadir GH < 0.4 µg/L, while the nadir GH remained between 0.4 and 1 µg/L in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients (notably young adult or adult women) without a typical phenotype in whom IGF-1 is measured due to a suspicious clinical scenario and is found to be slightly elevated, even if confirmed and in the absence of other causes, a nadir GH cut-off value of 0.4 µg/L instead of 1 µg/L in the OGTT might be inadequate for the diagnosis.

Elevated IGF-1 with GH suppression after an oral glucose overload: incipient acromegaly or false-positive IGF-1?

OBJECTIVE

To report the evolution of patients with a suggestive clinical scenario and elevated serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), but growth hormone (GH) suppression in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), in whom acromegaly was not initially excluded.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty six patients with a suggestive clinical scenario, who had elevated IGF-1 (outside puberty and pregnancy) in two measurements, but GH < 0.4 µg/L in the OGTT, were selected. Five years after initial evaluation, the patients were submitted to clinical and laboratory (serum IGF-1) reassessment. Patients with persistently elevated IGF-1 were submitted to a new GH suppression test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary.

RESULTS

Four patients were lost to follow-up. During reassessment, 42 patients continued to show no "typical phenotype" or changes in physiognomy. Fifteen of the 42 patients had normal IGF-1. Among the 27 patients with persistently elevated IGF-1 and who were submitted to a new OGTT, GH suppression was confirmed in all. Two patients exhibited a lesion suggestive of microadenoma on pituitary MRI. In our interpretation of the results, acromegaly was ruled out in 40 patients and considered "possible" in only 2.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that even in patients with a suggestive clinical scenario and elevated IGF-1, confirmed in a second measurement and without apparent cause, acromegaly is very unlikely in the case of GH suppression in the OGTT.

Cell-based assays for IGF-I bioactivity measurement: overview, limitations and current trends

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is an important growth promoting protein that is involved in numerous cellular responses and multiple biological systems. Although the molecular structure, function and recombinant production of IGF-I in various hosts have been the subject of much researches over the recent past, methods to determine the bioactivity of this protein have not been fully explored. Several assays have traditionally been used to measure IGF-I bioactivity, but have not become a routine laboratory practice due to the high cost involved and technical problems. Thus, there is still a need for a rapid, technically simple and accurate assay to determine IGF-I bioactivity. This review highlights the various cell-based assays currently commercially available for measuring the bioactivity of IGF-I along with their limitations. This is aimed at presenting the modern-day IGF researcher with a holistic overview of the current trends and future prospects regarding IGF-I bioactivity determinations.

Determination of IGFs and their binding proteins

The worldwide clinical and scientific interest in peptides belonging to the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system has brought along a call for standardization of assays used to quantify the different IGF related proteins. This relates in particular to the measurement of IGF-I, which has stood the test of time as an important biochemical tool in the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) related disorders. The first international consensus statement on the measurement of IGF-I in 2011 represents an important milestone and will undoubtedly improve commutability of reference ranges for IGF-I and clinically applicable cut-off values. By contrast, there is no consensus addressing the measurements of the other IGF-related peptides. Nevertheless, measurement of these peptides may be of interest, either as additional tools in GH disorders or as prognostic biomarkers of various diseases. Therefore, standardization of assays for the other IGF-related peptides is highly relevant. This chapter discusses the recent consensus on IGF-I measurements and how this approach may be applied to measurement of the other IGF-related peptides. In addition, assay pitfalls, pre- and post-analytical challenges, alternative methods for IGF-I measurements and potential assays of tomorrow will be discussed.

Targeted selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometric immunoassay for insulin-like growth factor 1

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) is an important biomarker of human growth disorders that is routinely analyzed in clinical laboratories. Mass spectrometry-based workflows offer a viable alternative to standard IGF1 immunoassays, which utilize various pre-analytical preparation strategies. In this work we developed an assay that incorporates a novel sample preparation method for dissociating IGF1 from its binding proteins. The workflow also includes an immunoaffinity step using antibody-derivatized pipette tips, followed by elution, trypsin digestion, and LC-MS/MS separation and detection of the signature peptides in a selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. The resulting quantitative mass spectrometric immunoassay (MSIA) exhibited good linearity in the range of 1 to 1,500 ng/mL IGF1, intra- and inter-assay precision with CVs of less than 10%, and lowest limits of detection of 1 ng/mL. The linearity and recovery characteristics of the assay were also established, and the new method compared to a commercially available immunoassay using a large cohort of human serum samples. The IGF1 SRM MSIA is well suited for use in clinical laboratories.

A novel mass spectrometry-based method for determining insulin-like growth factor 1: assessment in a cohort of subjects with newly diagnosed acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To develop an alternative method to immunoassay for the quantitative analysis of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) using a mass spectrometry (MS)-based approach.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

A stable isotope dilution Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography tandem MS (uHPLC-MS/MS)-based method for the quantification of IGF-1 was developed. The method employed Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) of two tryptic peptides derived from IGF-1, and utilised solid phase extraction for enrichment of the peptide fraction containing IGF-1 rather than immunocapture, so was less susceptible to assay interference. Plasma samples from 25 consecutive unselected patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly, collected both before and after 24 weeks of primary medical therapy with Lanreotide Autogel(®), were analysed by a widely used commercial immunoassay (Siemens Immulite 2000(®)) and by uHPLC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

The uHPLC-MS/MS method showed good correlation with the immunoassay over a wide range of IGF-1 concentrations. The Passing and Bablock regression was: uHPLC-MS/MS (nmol/l) = 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-1.46) × immunoassay (nmol/l) + 3.14 (95% confidence interval: -2.71 to 10.32). Six patients had discordant growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 levels following primary medical therapy, and in all six the immunoassay and uHPLC-MS/MS platforms returned comparable results. The method was not affected by concentrations of IGFBP3 up to 12,500 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

uHPLC-MS/MS offers an independent method for determining/validating IGF-1 in subjects with acromegaly. Further studies, including the establishment of age- and sex-matched reference ranges and calibration to the new International IGF-1 standard IS 02/254, are now required to allow its introduction in to routine clinical use.

Biotherapeutic bioanalysis: a multi-indication case study review

A thorough understanding of the structure and biology of a biotherapeutic is crucial to defining a suitable strategy for pharmacokinetic characterization in proof-of-concept disease models, toxicology species as well as the healthy and disease indication patient populations. This manuscript summarizes parameters that impact bioanalytical strategy for over 50 biotherapeutics indicated for the treatment of oncology, rheumatoid arthritis, allergy, multiple sclerosis, hematology, metabolism and infectious disease. We have addressed numerous therapeutic modalities including chimeric, humanized and fully human monoclonal antibodies, replacement proteins, peptides and fusion proteins, including polyethylene glycol and Fc fusions, as well as antibody–drug conjugates. With the rapid evolution of biotherapeutics over the last 20 years and the contraction of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology labor force, efficient workflow management becomes a crucial bioanalytical component. Thus, we have also addressed new technologies that have demonstrated either increased throughput or enhanced characterization, including Meso Scale Discovery, Gyrolab and affinity MS.