Adult height of prepubertal short children born small for gestational age treated with GH

[Short stature due to intrauterine growth retardation. Clinical and hormonal-metabolic features, possibilities of growth-stimulating therapy]

The article presents data about short stature due to intrauterine development delay. This type of short stature - separate nosology, unites children born small for gestation age. The majority of them in the first years of life have accelerated growth rates, allowing the child to normalize their weight-growth indicators and catch up in the development of peers. In the absence of an accelerated growth rates, children have a high risk of lagging behind in physical development throughout childhood, achieving low final growth and becoming short adults. In addition, the fact of birth with small body sizes is associated with a number of hormonal and metabolic features, a risk of metabolic syndrome in adult years.It is assumed that the absence of postnatal growth acceleration is due to various damages to the GH-IGF1 axis (partial GH deficiency, partial resistance to GH, partial resistance to IGF1). Growth hormone therapy, initiated early in life, is able to normalize growth rates in childhood and ultimately significantly improve or normalize the final growth of short stature children born small for gestational age.

Prediction models for short children born small for gestational age (SGA) covering the total growth phase. Analyses based on data from KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database)

BACKGROUND

Mathematical models can be developed to predict growth in short children treated with growth hormone (GH). These models can serve to optimize and individualize treatment in terms of height outcomes and costs. The aims of this study were to compile existing prediction models for short children born SGA (SGA), to develop new models and to validate the algorithms.

METHODS

Existing models to predict height velocity (HV) for the first two and the fourth prepubertal years and during total pubertal growth (TPG) on GH were applied to SGA children from the KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database)--1st year: N = 2340; 2nd year: N = 1358; 4th year: N = 182; TPG: N = 59. A new prediction model was developed for the 3rd prepubertal year based upon 317 children by means of the all-possible regression approach, using Mallow's C(p) criterion.

RESULTS

The comparison between the observed and predicted height velocity showed no significant difference when the existing prediction models were applied to new cohorts. A model for predicting HV during the 3rd year explained 33% of the variability with an error SD of 1.0 cm/year. The predictors were (in order of importance): HV previous year; chronological age; weight SDS; mid-parent height SDS and GH dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Models to predict growth to GH from prepubertal years to adult height are available for short children born SGA. The models utilize easily accessible predictors and are accurate. The overall explained variability in SGA is relatively low, due to the heterogeneity of the disorder. The models can be used to provide patients with a realistic expectation of treatment, and may help to identify compliance problems or other underlying causes of treatment failure.

Impact of growth hormone therapy on adult height of children born small for gestational age

CONTEXT

Use of growth hormone (GH) therapy to promote growth in short children born small for gestational age (SGA) was recently approved in the United States and Europe, but there is still disagreement about the magnitude of effectiveness of GH.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of GH therapy on adult height in short SGA children by a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of controlled studies using as data sources the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and the bibliographic references from all retrieved articles describing RCTs up to November 2008. A meta-analysis of all RCT studies conducted up to the achievement of adult height was performed. Inclusion criteria were birth weight and/or length below -2 SD score (SDS), initial height less than -2 SDS, and GH dose range of 33 to 67 microg/kg per day. Adult height SDS and overall height gain SDS were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Four RCTs (391 children) met the inclusion criteria. The adult height of the GH-treated group significantly exceeded controls by 0.9 SDS. Mean height gain was 1.5 SDS in treated versus 0.25 SDS in untreated SGA subjects. No significant difference in adult height was observed between the 2 GH dose regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

GH therapy seems to be an effective approach to partially reduce the adult height deficit in short SGA children. However, the response to therapy is highly variable, and additional studies are needed to identify the responders.

Growth hormone treatment for short stature in children born small for gestational age

Children born small for gestational age (SGA) who do not show catch-up in the first 2 years generally remain short for life. Although the majority of children born SGA are not growth hormone (GH) deficient, GH treatment is known to improve average growth in these children.Early studies using GH in children born SGA demonstrated increased height velocity, but these effects tended to be short-term with effects decreasing when GH treatment stopped. With refined GH regimens, significant effects on height have been shown, with gains of approximately 1 standard deviation score after 2 years. Studies have also shown that long-term continuous GH therapy can significantly increase final height to within the normal range. GH treatment of children born SGA does not appear to unduly affect bone age or pubertal development. Growth prediction models have been used to identify various factors involved in the response to GH therapy with age at start, treatment duration, and GH dose showing strong effects. Genetic factors such as the exon 3 deletion of the GH receptor may contribute to short stature of children born SGA and may also be involved in the responsiveness to GH treatment, but there remain other unknown genetic and/or environmental factors. No unexpected safety concerns have arisen in GH therapy trials. In particular, no long-term adverse effects have been seen for glucose metabolism, and positive effects have been shown for lipid profiles and blood pressure.GH treatment in short children born SGA has shown a beneficial, growth-promoting effect in both the short-and long-term, and has become a recognized indication in both the US and Europe. Further studies on individualized treatment regimens and long-term safety are ongoing.

Safety and efficacy of growth hormone treatment in small for gestational age children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately 100,000 infants are born small for gestational age (birth weight <2 standard deviation) annually in the US alone. Because of catch-up growth, 10-20% of all children born small for gestational age will be eligible for growth hormone therapy. Growth hormone has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2003 and by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products though at different enrollment and treatment criteria. Benefits and risks of growth hormone therapy for small for gestational age children are the purpose of the present review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mean height increased by as much as two standard deviation over 3 years of treatment in infants born small for gestational age. Rapid catch-up growth is desirable and will only be achieved with higher growth hormone doses (0.48 mg/kg/week) Treatment should be continuous and not interrupted. The safety profile of growth hormone treatment is excellent. Transient elevation of insulin levels returned to near normal after growth hormone treatment was discontinued.

SUMMARY

Growth hormone treatment in small for gestational age children has been found to be well tolerated and is an important advance in the treatment of short stature in pediatrics. Treatment of short prematurely born infants with growth hormone may offer similar efficacy and safety as growth hormone treatment in small for gestational age infants.

Improvement in growth after two years of growth hormone therapy in very young children born small for gestational age and without spontaneous catch-up growth: results of a multicenter, controlled, randomized, open clinical trial

CONTEXT

GH treatment is effective in children born small for gestational age (SGA); however, its effectiveness and safety in very young SGA children is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to analyze the outcome of very young SGA children treated with GH and followed for 2 yr. The results after 24 months of treatment, compared with a control group without treatment during 12 months followed by 12 months of treatment, are shown.

DESIGN

We performed a multicenter, controlled, randomized, open trial.

SETTINGS

The pediatric endocrinology departments of 14 public hospitals in Spain participated in the study.

PATIENTS

Seventy-six children, aged 2-5 yr born SGA and without catch-up growth, were studied.

INTERVENTION

Children received GH at 0.06 mg/kg.d for 2 yr (group I) or were followed for 12 months with no treatment and then treated for 12 months (group II).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age, general health status, pubertal stage, bone age, height, weight, biochemical and hormonal analyses, and adverse side effects were determined at biannual check-ups.

RESULTS

The mean height sd score gain for chronological age in children treated for 24 months (group I) was 2.10, whereas in those treated only during the last 12 months (group II) was 1.43. In both groups, children under 4 yr of age had the greatest gain in growth velocity. No significant acceleration of bone age or side effects related to treatment was seen.

CONCLUSION

Very young SGA children without spontaneous catch-up growth could benefit from GH treatment because growth was accelerated and no negative side effects were observed.

Small for gestational age: short stature and beyond

Depending on the definitions used, up to 10% of all live-born neonates are small for gestational age (SGA). Although the vast majority of these children show catch-up growth by 2 yr of age, one in 10 does not. It is increasingly recognized that those who are born SGA are at risk of developing metabolic disease later in life. Reduced fetal growth has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The majority of pathology is seen in adults who show spontaneous catch-up growth as children. There is evidence to suggest that some of the metabolic consequences of intrauterine growth retardation in children born SGA can be mitigated by ensuring early appropriate catch-up growth, while avoiding excessive weight gain. Implicitly, this argument questions current infant formula feeding practices. The risk is less clear for individuals who do not show catch-up growth and who are treated with GH for short stature. Recent data, however, suggest that long-term treatment with GH does not increase the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome in young adults born SGA.

Growth hormone treatment of non-growth hormone-deficient growth disorders

Although a large body of data on efficacy and safety of growth hormone (GH) treatment for various non-growth hormone-deficient (GHD) growth disorders has accumulated from a combination of clinical trial and postmarketing sources in the last 20 years or more, there remain limitations. Clinical trial data have the advantage of direct comparison of well-matched, randomized patient groups receiving treatment (or not) under comparable conditions and, as such, provide the highest quality evidence of efficacy. Clinical trials, however, are typically too small for any statistically valid assessment for safety, which is more comprehensively addressed using postmarketing data. Consequently, while the efficacy of GH treatment in children with non-GHD growth disorders has been solidly established and, based on the combination of the rigor of the clinical trial data and numerical power of the postmarketing data, no major concerns exist regarding safety, additional long-term data are required.

Growth Hormone Therapy in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age

There is still a lack of data from randomized, controlled, long-term studies of growth hormone (GH) treatment in children born small for gestational age (SGA), but the available evidence indicates consistently that GH therapy is a valid growth-promoting treatment in these children, particularly if started early. Whilst side effects appear uncommon, ongoing surveillance is required and treated children should be monitored for changes in glucose homeostasis, lipid profiles and blood pressure, especially during puberty. We provide an update on the safety and efficacy of GH treatment in short children born SGA.

Growth hormone therapy in short children born small for gestational age

Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is one of the most common causes of childhood short stature, and recombinant GH therapy has been recently licensed to promote growth in short SGA children from the age of 4 years old. Studies are now reporting very encouraging effects on adult height gains, especially in those children who started GH therapy early, at least 2 years prior to the onset of puberty. Compared to the age at starting treatment, the GH dose has a less significant impact on final height, and more attention needs to be paid now to identify earlier those SGA children who fail to catch-up spontaneously. The benefits are not just in terms of height, but also in body composition and possibly blood pressure and lipid levels. However the risk of side effects and long-term complications, particularly related to the expected metabolic effects of GH in inducing insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, need to be carefully monitored especially in SGA children with a family history of type 2 diabetes. Recently, GH therapy was found to amplify the adrenarche of short SGA children and to induce a pro-inflammatory shift, as judged by a rise of neutrophil count and circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6), and a fall in adiponectin levels. Further progress is anticipated to assess the addition of insulin-sensitizing therapy to attenuate the GH-induced hyperinsulinemia, in order to alter the pro-inflammatory course, to avoid excessive release of adrenal androgens, and to slow down the potential rapid tempo of pubertal progression in SGA children. In the meantime, post-SGA short stature is rapidly becoming one of the prime indications for GH therapy in childhood.