1
|
Fang M, Li J, Fang H, Wu J, Wu Z, He L, Deng J, Chen C. Prediction of acute kidney injury after total aortic arch replacement with serum cystatin C and urine N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase: A prospective observational study. Clin Chim Acta 2023; 539:105-113. [PMID: 36521552 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) after total aortic arch replacement (TAAR) is frequent and associated with adverse outcomes, whereas its early detection remains a challenge. Serum cystatin C (sCysC) and urinary N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (uNAG) are clinically available renal biomarkers, but their combination for AKI detection requires more evidence. This study aimed to assess the discriminative abilities of these biomarkers in AKI after TAAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing TAAR were included in this prospective observational study. The AKI prediction model was developed and internal verificated, and the significance of each variable was analyzed by random forest (RF). Finally, the best predictive critical values of sCysC and uNAG were explored by the AUC-ROC curve. RESULTS The AUC-ROC of the prediction model was substantially enhanced by adding sCysC and uNAG (0.909 vs 0.844, p < 0.001), and the clinical utility and risk reclassification were significantly improved. Additionally, the RF showed that sCysC and uNAG ranked first and second. The AUC-ROC for each were 0.864 and 0.802 respectively, and the cut-off values were 1.395 mg/L and 31.90 U/g Cre respectively. CONCLUSION The prediction model incorporating functional marker sCysC and tubular injury marker uNAG can improve the discriminative abilities of AKI after TAAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaoxian Fang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Heng Fang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jinlin Wu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Linling He
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia Deng
- Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Chunbo Chen
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang M, Li L, Li J, Xu M, Pu X, Li Q, Sun L, Zhang H, Gong M. Influence of Dynamic and Static Obstructive Renal Artery on Early Prognosis in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31:882-888. [PMID: 35074261 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) after acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD) surgery has a high mortality rate. Clarifying what type of renal artery problem (dynamic obstructive renal artery, DORA, or static obstructive renal artery, SORA) secondary to STAAD benefits from true lumen opening is helpful in providing a reference for the indication of renal artery intervention. METHODS From May 2018 to December 2019, 292 acute STAAD patients who underwent aortic surgery were enrolled in this study. DORA, SORA, and renal malperfusion were diagnosed according to preoperative aortic enhanced computed tomography (CTA). Renal artery problems secondary to STAAD were divided into three types: type 1, normal renal artery; type 2, DORA; and type 3, SORA. Acute kidney injury was divided into three stages: Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3, according to 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). The primary endpoint was all-cause 30-day in-hospital death, and the secondary endpoint was postoperative dialysis requirement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the difference among the three types. RESULTS Postoperative AKI occurred in 154 of 292 (52.7%) patients, and postoperative dialysis was present in 27 of 292 (9.2%) patients with STAAD. Postoperative AKI and dialysis were significantly more prevalent in the SORA group (AKI: 71% in SORA group vs 51.5% in DORA group vs 22.2% in normal group; postoperative dialysis: 22.2% in SORA group vs 5.4% in DORA group vs 6.1 in normal group). Thirty-day (30-day) mortality was also significantly higher in the SORA group (Log-rank test, p=0.012). Preoperative acute myocardial infarction and body mass index were the independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Static obstructive renal artery, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and renal blood cell transfusion >3 units were the independent risk factors for postoperative dialysis requirement. CONCLUSION Static obstructive renal artery led to higher 30-day in-hospital mortality and more postoperative dialysis. Open surgery reduced renal ischaemia injury caused by DORA, but it could not reduce renal ischaemia injury caused by SORA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maozhou Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jingzhang Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Menghui Xu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Pu
- Department of Intervention Diagnosis and Therapy, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qianxian Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lizhong Sun
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjia Zhang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Gong
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li L, Wang M, Li J, Guan X, Xin P, Wang X, Liu Y, Li H, Jiang W, Gong M, Zhang H. Short Term Prognosis of Renal Artery Stenosis Secondary to Acute Type B Aortic Dissection With TEVAR. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:658952. [PMID: 33969023 PMCID: PMC8102698 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.658952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of renal artery stenosis (RAS) resulting from acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on early prognosis in patients with ATBAD. Methods: A total of 129 ATBAD patients in the National Acute Aortic Syndrome Database (AASCN) who underwent TEVAR between 2019 and 2020 were enrolled in our study. Patients were divided into two groups: the RAS group and the non-RAS group. Results: There were 21 RAS patients (16.3%) and 108 non-RAS patients (83.7%) in our cohort. No patient in our cohort died during the 1-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in preoperative creatinine clearance rate (CCr) between the two groups (90.6 ± 46.1 μmol/L in the RAS group vs. 78.7 ± 39.2 μmol/L in the non-RAS group, P = 0.303) but the RAS group had a significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) than the non-RAS group (83.3 ± 25.0 vs. 101.9 ± 26.9 ml/min, respectively; P = 0.028).One month after TEVAR, CCr was significantly higher (99.0 ± 68.1 vs. 78.5 ± 25.8 ml/min, P = 0.043) and eGFR (81.7 ± 23.8 vs. 96.0 ± 20.0 ml/min, P = 0.017) was significantly lower in the RAS group than in the non-RAS group. Conclusions: In ATBAD, RAS could result in acute kidney injury (AKI) in the early stage after TEVAR. The RAS group had a high incidence of hypertension. These results suggest that patients with RAS may need further treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Maozhou Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jinzhang Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xinliang Guan
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Pu Xin
- Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China.,Department of Medical Imaging, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolong Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuyong Liu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Haiyang Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjian Jiang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Gong
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Hongjia Zhang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Beijing, China.,Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|