Germ Cell Segregation from the Drosophila Soma Is Controlled by an Inhibitory Threshold Set by the Arf-GEF Steppke

Origin and establishment of the germline in Drosophila melanogaster

The continuity of a species depends on germ cells. Germ cells are different from all the other cell types of the body (somatic cells) as they are solely destined to develop into gametes (sperm or egg) to create the next generation. In this review, we will touch on 4 areas of embryonic germ cell development in Drosophila melanogaster: the assembly and function of germplasm, which houses the determinants for germ cell specification and fate and the mitochondria of the next generation; the process of pole cell formation, which will give rise to primordial germ cells (PGCs); the specification of pole cells toward the PGC fate; and finally, the migration of PGCs to the somatic gonadal precursors, where they, together with somatic gonadal precursors, form the embryonic testis and ovary.

A deficiency screen identifies genomic regions critical for sperm head-tail connection

The Sperm Neck provides a stable connection between the sperm head and tail, which is critical for fertility in species with flagellated sperm. Within the Sperm Neck, the Head-Tail Coupling Apparatus serves as the critical link between the nucleus (head) and the axoneme (tail) via the centriole. To identify regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome that contain genetic elements that influence Head-Tail Coupling Apparatus formation, we undertook a 2 part screen using the Drosophila Deficiency kit. For this screen, we utilized a sensitized genetic background that overexpresses the pericentriolar material regulatory protein Pericentrin-Like Protein. We had previously shown that Pericentrin-Like Protein overexpression disrupts the head-tail connection in some spermatids, but not to a degree sufficient to reduce fertility. In the first step of the screen, we tested for deficiencies that in combination with Pericentrin-Like Protein overexpression causes a reduction in fertility. We ultimately identified 11 regions of the genome that resulted in an enhanced fertility defect when combined with Pericentrin-Like Protein overexpression. In the second step of the screen, we tested these deficiencies for their ability to enhance the head-tail connection defect caused by Pericentrin-Like Protein overexpression, finding 6 genomic regions. We then tested smaller deficiencies to narrow the region of the genome that contained these enhancers and examined the expression patterns of the genes within these deficiencies using publicly available datasets of Drosophila tissue RNAseq and Drosophila testes snRNAseq. In total, our analysis suggests that some deficiencies may contain single genes that influence Head-Tail Coupling Apparatus formation or fertility, while other deficiencies appear to be genomic regions rich in testis-expressed genes that might affect the Head-Tail Coupling Apparatus through complex, multigene interactions.

Surrounding tissue morphogenesis with disrupted posterior midgut invagination during Drosophila gastrulation

Gastrulation involves multiple, physically-coupled tissue rearrangements. During Drosophila gastrulation, posterior midgut (PMG) invagination promotes both germband extension and hindgut invagination, but whether the normal epithelial rearrangement of PMG invagination is required for morphogenesis of the connected tissues has been unclear. In steppke mutants, epithelial organization of the PMG primordium is strongly disrupted. Despite this disruption, germband extension and hindgut invagination are remarkably effective, and involve myosin network inductions known to promote their wild-type remodelling. Known tissue-autonomous signaling could explain the planar-polarized, junctional myosin networks of the germband, but pushing forces from PMG invagination have been implicated in inducing apical myosin networks of the hindgut primordium. To confirm that the wave of hindgut primordium myosin accumulations is due to mechanical effects, rather than diffusive signalling, we analyzed α-catenin RNAi embryos, in which all of the epithelial tissues initially form but then lose cell-cell adhesion, and observed strongly diminished hindgut primordium myosin accumulations. Thus, alternate mechanical changes in steppke mutants seem to circumvent the lack of normal PMG invagination to induce hindgut myosin networks and invagination. Overall, both germband extension and hindgut invagination are robust to experimental disruption of the PMG invagination, and, although the processes occur with some abnormalities in steppke mutants, there is remarkable redundancy in the multi-tissue system. Such redundancy could allow complex morphogenetic processes to change over evolutionary time.

A deficiency screen identifies genomic regions critical for sperm head-tail connection

A stable connection between the sperm head and tail is critical for fertility in species with flagellated sperm. The head-tail coupling apparatus (HTCA) serves as the critical link between the nucleus (head) and the axoneme (tail) via the centriole. To identify regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome that contain genetic elements that influence HTCA formation, we undertook a two part screen using the Drosophila deficiency (Df) kit. For this screen, we utilized a sensitized genetic background that overexpresses the pericentriolar material regulatory protein Pericentrin-Like Protein (PLP). We had previously shown that PLP overexpression (PLPOE) disrupts the head-tail connection in some spermatids, but not to a degree sufficient to reduce fertility. In the first step of the screen we tested for Dfs that in combination with PLPOE cause a reduction in fertility. We ultimately identified 11 regions of the genome that showed an enhanced fertility defect when combined with PLP overexpression. In the second step of the screen we tested these Dfs for their ability to enhance the HTCA defect caused by PLPOE, finding six. We then tested smaller Dfs to narrow the region of the genome that contained these enhancers. To further analyze the regions of the genome removed by these Dfs, we examined the expression patterns of the genes within these Dfs in publicly available datasets of RNAseq of Drosophila tissues and snRNAseq of Drosophila testes. In total, our analysis suggests that some of these Dfs may contain a single gene that might influence HTCA formation and / or fertility, while others appear to be regions of the genome especially rich in testis-expressed genes that might affect the HTCA because of complex, multi-gene interactions.

Reshaping the Syncytial Drosophila Embryo with Cortical Actin Networks: Four Main Steps of Early Development

Drosophila development begins as a syncytium. The large size of the one-cell embryo makes it ideal for studying the structure, regulation, and effects of the cortical actin cytoskeleton. We review four main steps of early development that depend on the actin cortex. At each step, dynamic remodelling of the cortex has specific effects on nuclei within the syncytium. During axial expansion, a cortical actomyosin network assembles and disassembles with the cell cycle, generating cytoplasmic flows that evenly distribute nuclei along the ovoid cell. When nuclei move to the cell periphery, they seed Arp2/3-based actin caps which grow into an array of dome-like compartments that house the nuclei as they divide at the cell cortex. To separate germline nuclei from the soma, posterior germ plasm induces full cleavage of mono-nucleated primordial germ cells from the syncytium. Finally, zygotic gene expression triggers formation of the blastoderm epithelium via cellularization and simultaneous division of ~6000 mono-nucleated cells from a single internal yolk cell. During these steps, the cortex is regulated in space and time, gains domain and sub-domain structure, and undergoes mesoscale interactions that lay a structural foundation of animal development.

The Arf-GEF Steppke promotes F-actin accumulation, cell protrusions and tissue sealing during Drosophila dorsal closure

Cytohesin Arf-GEFs promote actin polymerization and protrusions of cultured cells, whereas the Drosophila cytohesin, Steppke, antagonizes actomyosin networks in several developmental contexts. To reconcile these findings, we analyzed epidermal leading edge actin networks during Drosophila embryo dorsal closure. Here, Steppke is required for F-actin of the actomyosin cable and for actin-based protrusions. steppke mutant defects in the leading edge actin networks are associated with improper sealing of the dorsal midline, but are distinguishable from effects of myosin mis-regulation. Steppke localizes to leading edge cell-cell junctions with accumulations of the F-actin regulator Enabled emanating from either side. Enabled requires Steppke for full leading edge recruitment, and genetic interaction shows the proteins cooperate for dorsal closure. Inversely, Steppke over-expression induces ectopic, actin-rich, lamellar cell protrusions, an effect dependent on the Arf-GEF activity and PH domain of Steppke, but independent of Steppke recruitment to myosin-rich AJs via its coiled-coil domain. Thus, Steppke promotes actin polymerization and cell protrusions, effects that occur in conjunction with Steppke's previously reported regulation of myosin contractility during dorsal closure.

Transcriptomic and functional analysis of the oosome, a unique form of germ plasm in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis

BACKGROUND

The oosome is the germline determinant in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis and is homologous to the polar granules of Drosophila. Despite a common evolutionary origin and developmental role, the oosome is morphologically quite distinct from polar granules. It is a solid sphere that migrates within the cytoplasm before budding out and forming pole cells.

RESULTS

To gain an understanding of both the molecular basis of oosome development and the conserved essential features of germ plasm, we quantified and compared transcript levels between embryo fragments that contained the oosome and those that did not. The identity of the differentially localized transcripts indicated that Nasonia uses a distinct set of molecules to carry out conserved germ plasm functions. In addition, functional testing of a sample of localized transcripts revealed potentially novel mechanisms of ribonucleoprotein assembly and pole cell cellularization in the wasp.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the composition of germ plasm varies significantly within Holometabola, as very few mRNAs share localization to the oosome and polar granules. Some of this variability appears to be related to the unique properties of the oosome relative to the polar granules in Drosophila, and some may be related to differences in pole formation between species. This work will serve as the basis for further investigation into the patterns of germline determinant evolution among insects, the molecular basis of the unique properties of the oosome, and the incorporation of novel components into developmental networks.

Coordination of Embryogenesis by the Centrosome in Drosophila melanogaster

The first 3 h of Drosophila melanogaster embryo development are exemplified by rapid nuclear divisions within a large syncytium, transforming the zygote to the cellular blastoderm after 13 successive cleavage divisions. As the syncytial embryo develops, it relies on centrosomes and cytoskeletal dynamics to transport nuclei, maintain uniform nuclear distribution throughout cleavage cycles, ensure generation of germ cells, and coordinate cellularization. For the sake of this review, we classify six early embryo stages that rely on processes coordinated by the centrosome and its regulation of the cytoskeleton. The first stage features migration of one of the female pronuclei toward the male pronucleus following maturation of the first embryonic centrosomes. Two subsequent stages distribute the nuclei first axially and then radially in the embryo. The remaining three stages involve centrosome-actin dynamics that control cortical plasma membrane morphogenesis. In this review, we highlight the dynamics of the centrosome and its role in controlling the six stages that culminate in the cellularization of the blastoderm embryo.

Germ Cell-less Promotes Centrosome Segregation to Induce Germ Cell Formation

The primordial germ cells (PGCs) specified during embryogenesis serve as progenitors to the adult germline stem cells. In Drosophila, the proper specification and formation of PGCs require both centrosomes and germ plasm, which contains the germline determinants. Centrosomes are microtubule (MT)-organizing centers that ensure the faithful segregation of germ plasm into PGCs. To date, mechanisms that modulate centrosome behavior to engineer PGC development have remained elusive. Only one germ plasm component, Germ cell-less (Gcl), is known to play a role in PGC formation. Here, we show that Gcl engineers PGC formation by regulating centrosome dynamics. Loss of gcl leads to aberrant centrosome separation and elaboration of the astral MT network, resulting in inefficient germ plasm segregation and aborted PGC cellularization. Importantly, compromising centrosome separation alone is sufficient to mimic the gcl loss-of-function phenotypes. We conclude Gcl functions as a key regulator of centrosome separation required for proper PGC development.

GCL and CUL3 Control the Switch between Cell Lineages by Mediating Localized Degradation of an RTK

The separation of germline from somatic lineages is fundamental to reproduction and species preservation. Here, we show that Drosophila Germ cell-less (GCL) is a critical component in this process by acting as a switch that turns off a somatic lineage pathway. GCL, a conserved BTB (Broad-complex, Tramtrack, and Bric-a-brac) protein, is a substrate-specific adaptor for Cullin3-RING ubiquitin ligase complex (CRL3^GCL). We show that CRL3^GCL promotes PGC fate by mediating degradation of Torso, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and major determinant of somatic cell fate. This mode of RTK degradation does not depend upon receptor activation but is prompted by release of GCL from the nuclear envelope during mitosis. The cell-cycle-dependent change in GCL localization provides spatiotemporal specificity for RTK degradation and sequesters CRL3^GCL to prevent it from participating in excessive activities. This precisely orchestrated mechanism of CRL3^GCL function and regulation defines cell fate at the single-cell level.

The Arf GAP Asap promotes Arf1 function at the Golgi for cleavage furrow biosynthesis in Drosophila

Drosophila embryo cleavage requires the conserved Arf GAP Asap. Asap seems to recycle Arf1 to the Golgi from post-Golgi membranes for optimal Golgi output and cleavage furrow biosynthesis.

Biosynthetic traffic from the Golgi drives plasma membrane growth. For Drosophila embryo cleavage, this growth is rapid but regulated for cycles of furrow ingression and regression. The highly conserved small G protein Arf1 organizes Golgi trafficking. Arf1 is activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors, but essential roles for Arf1 GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) are less clear. We report that the conserved Arf GAP Asap is required for cleavage furrow ingression in the early embryo. Because Asap can affect multiple subcellular processes, we used genetic approaches to dissect its primary effect. Our data argue against cytoskeletal or endocytic involvement and reveal a common role for Asap and Arf1 in Golgi organization. Although Asap lacked Golgi enrichment, it was necessary and sufficient for Arf1 accumulation at the Golgi, and a conserved Arf1-Asap binding site was required for Golgi organization and output. Of note, Asap relocalized to the nuclear region at metaphase, a shift that coincided with subtle Golgi reorganization preceding cleavage furrow regression. We conclude that Asap is essential for Arf1 to function at the Golgi for cleavage furrow biosynthesis. Asap may recycle Arf1 to the Golgi from post-Golgi membranes, providing optimal Golgi output for specific stages of the cell cycle.

PH Domain-Arf G Protein Interactions Localize the Arf-GEF Steppke for Cleavage Furrow Regulation in Drosophila

The recruitment of GDP/GTP exchange factors (GEFs) to specific subcellular sites dictates where they activate small G proteins for the regulation of various cellular processes. Cytohesins are a conserved family of plasma membrane GEFs for Arf small G proteins that regulate endocytosis. Analyses of mammalian cytohesins have identified a number of recruitment mechanisms for these multi-domain proteins, but the conservation and developmental roles for these mechanisms are unclear. Here, we report how the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of the Drosophila cytohesin Steppke affects its localization and activity at cleavage furrows of the early embryo. We found that the PH domain is necessary for Steppke furrow localization, and for it to regulate furrow structure. However, the PH domain was not sufficient for the localization. Next, we examined the role of conserved PH domain amino acid residues that are required for mammalian cytohesins to bind PIP3 or GTP-bound Arf G proteins. We confirmed that the Steppke PH domain preferentially binds PIP3 in vitro through a conserved mechanism. However, disruption of residues for PIP3 binding had no apparent effect on GFP-Steppke localization and effects. Rather, residues for binding to GTP-bound Arf G proteins made major contributions to this Steppke localization and activity. By analyzing GFP-tagged Arf and Arf-like small G proteins, we found that Arf1-GFP, Arf6-GFP and Arl4-GFP, but not Arf4-GFP, localized to furrows. However, analyses of embryos depleted of Arf1, Arf6 or Arl4 revealed either earlier defects than occur in embryos depleted of Steppke, or no detectable furrow defects, possibly because of redundancies, and thus it was difficult to assess how individual Arf small G proteins affect Steppke. Nonetheless, our data show that the Steppke PH domain and its conserved residues for binding to GTP-bound Arf G proteins have substantial effects on Steppke localization and activity in early Drosophila embryos.