1
|
Zhou T, Zhang J, Liang Y, Gu R, Ma Y, Zhu W, Li J, Du X, Wang X, Wang P, Liu Y, Zhen S, Fu J, Li L, Zhang H. Nonadditive regulation confers phenotypic variation in hybrid maize. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2025; 246:631-644. [PMID: 39945291 DOI: 10.1111/nph.20453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/21/2025]
Abstract
Our knowledge of how the parental genomes interact to shape hybrid performance remains limited. This work established four hybrid maize populations and evaluated plant height (PH) in both the parental and hybrid populations, generating an extensive transcriptome and translatome dataset. We conducted a genome-wide association study, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTLs) mapping, transcriptome-wide association mapping (TWAS), and allele-specific expression analysis to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms underlying PH variation in hybrids. QTLs, eQTLs, and TWAS-associated genes (TAGs) exhibited both distinct variations and conserved patterns between the maternal and hybrid populations. The functional route (FR)-following QTLs demonstrated significant nonadditive effects on PH and expression traits. The intergenomic interactions of eQTLs in the heterozygous state drive the nonadditive regulation of eQTL-regulated genes (eGenes), resulting in the transformation of eGenes into TAGs and eQTLs into nonadditive QTLs for PH. This regulatory mechanism is further supported by the nonadditive regulation of phytohormone-related genes. Additionally, nonadditive TAGs and QTLs are implicated in regulating nonadditive translation. This study elucidates how nonadditive QTLs contribute to phenotypic variation in hybrid maize, offering a fresh perspective on the understanding of plant heterosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Zhou
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Yan Liang
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Riliang Gu
- State Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-breeding, Beijing Innovation Center for Crop Seed Technology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Yuting Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Wanchao Zhu
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Juan Li
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Xuemei Du
- State Key Laboratory of Maize Bio-breeding, Beijing Innovation Center for Crop Seed Technology of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xiaoli Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Pingxi Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Yangyang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Sihan Zhen
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Junjie Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Lin Li
- National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Hongwei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali B, Mary‐Huard T, Charcosset A, Moreau L, Rincent R. Improvement in genomic prediction of maize with prior gene ontology information depends on traits and environmental conditions. THE PLANT GENOME 2025; 18:e20553. [PMID: 39779652 PMCID: PMC11711123 DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Revised: 11/12/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Classical genomic prediction approaches rely on statistical associations between traits and markers rather than their biological significance. Biologically informed selection of genomic regions can help prioritize polymorphisms by considering underlying biological processes, making prediction models robust and accurate. Gene ontology (GO) terms can be used for this purpose, and the information can be integrated into genomic prediction models through marker categorization. It allows likely causal markers to account for a certain portion of genetic variance independently from the remaining markers. We systematically tested a list of 5110 GO terms for their predictive performance for physiological (platform traits) and productivity traits (field grain yield) in a maize (Zea mays L.) panel using genomic features best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP) model. Predictive abilities were compared to the classical genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). Predictive gains with categorizing markers based on a given GO term strongly depend on the trait and on the growth conditions, as a term can be useful for a given trait in a given condition or somewhat similar conditions but not useful for the same trait in a different condition. Overall, results of all GFBLUP models compared to GBLUP show that the former might be less efficient than the latter. Even though we could not identify a prior criterion to determine which GO terms can offer benefit to a given trait, we could a posteriori find biological interpretations of the results, meaning that GFBLUP could be helpful if more about the gene functions and their relationships with the growth conditions was known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baber Ali
- INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE–Le MoulonUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Tristan Mary‐Huard
- INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE–Le MoulonUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
- MIA Paris‐Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTechUniversité Paris‐SaclayPalaiseauFrance
| | - Alain Charcosset
- INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE–Le MoulonUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Laurence Moreau
- INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE–Le MoulonUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Renaud Rincent
- INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE–Le MoulonUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tanaka R, Kawai T, Kawakatsu T, Tanaka N, Shenton M, Yabe S, Uga Y. Transcriptome-based prediction for polygenic traits in rice using different gene subsets. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:915. [PMID: 39354337 PMCID: PMC11443665 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10803-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcriptome-based prediction of complex phenotypes is a relatively new statistical method that links genetic variation to phenotypic variation. The selection of large-effect genes based on a priori biological knowledge is beneficial for predicting oligogenic traits; however, such a simple gene selection method is not applicable to polygenic traits because causal genes or large-effect loci are often unknown. Here, we used several gene-level features and tested whether it was possible to select a gene subset that resulted in better predictive ability than using all genes for predicting a polygenic trait. RESULTS Using the phenotypic values of shoot and root traits and transcript abundances in leaves and roots of 57 rice accessions, we evaluated the predictive abilities of the transcriptome-based prediction models. Leaf transcripts predicted shoot phenotypes, such as plant height, more accurately than root transcripts, whereas root transcripts predicted root phenotypes, such as crown root length, more accurately than leaf transcripts. Furthermore, we used the following three features to train the prediction model: (1) tissue specificity of the transcripts, (2) ontology annotations, and (3) co-expression modules for selecting gene subsets. Although models trained by a gene subset often resulted in lower predictive abilities than the model trained by all genes, some gene subsets showed improved predictive ability. For example, using genes expressed in roots but not in leaves, the predictive ability for crown root diameter was improved by more than 10% (R2 = 0.59 when using all genes; R2 = 0.66, using 1,554 root-specifically expressed genes). Similarly, genes annotated as "gibberellic acid sensitivity" showed higher predictive ability than using all genes for root dry weight. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight both the possibility and difficulty of selecting an appropriate gene subset to predict polygenic traits from transcript abundance, given the current biological knowledge and information. Further integration of multiple sources of information, as well as improvements in gene characterization, may enable the selection of an optimal gene set for the prediction of polygenic phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryokei Tanaka
- Institute of Crop Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan.
| | - Tsubasa Kawai
- Institute of Crop Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan
| | - Taiji Kawakatsu
- Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8604, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Tanaka
- Institute of Crop Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan
| | - Matthew Shenton
- Institute of Crop Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan
| | - Shiori Yabe
- Institute of Crop Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan
| | - Yusaku Uga
- Institute of Crop Sciences, National Agriculture & Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8518, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumar P, Choudhary M, Sheoran S, Longmei N, Kumar B, Jat BS, Dagla MC, Bhushan B, Aggarwal SK, Bagaria PK, Sharma A, Singh SB. Teosinte-Derived Advanced Backcross Population Harbors Genomic Regions for Grain Yield Attributing Traits in Maize. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:10300. [PMID: 39408630 PMCID: PMC11476406 DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Maize is a highly versatile crop holding significant importance in global food, feed and nutritional security. Grain yield is a complex trait and difficult to improve without targeting the improvement of grain yield attributing traits, which are relatively less complex in nature. Hence, considering the erosion in genetic diversity, there is an urgent need to use wild relatives for genetic diversification and unravel the genomic regions for grain yield attributing traits in maize. Thus, the current study aimed to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) linked with grain yield and yield attributing traits. Two BC2F2 populations developed from the cross of LM13 with Zea parviglumis (population 1) and LM14 with Zea parviglumis (population 2) were genotyped and phenotyped in field conditions in the kharif season. BC2F2:3 lines in both populations were phenotyped again for grain yield and attributing traits in the spring season. In total, three QTLs each for ear height (EH), two QTLs for flag leaf length (FLL) and one QTL each for ear diameter (ED), plant height, flag leaf length (FLL), flag leaf width and 100 kernel-weight were identified in population 1. In population 2, two QTLs for kernel row per ear (KRPE) and one QTL for FLL were detected in. QTLs for EH, FLL and KPRE showed consistency across seasons. Among the identified QTLs, six QTLs were found to be co-localized near identified genomic regions in previous studies, validating their potential in contributing to trait expression. The identified QTLs can be utilized for marker assisted selection, transferring favorable alleles from wild relatives in modern maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pardeep Kumar
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Mukesh Choudhary
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Seema Sheoran
- ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute Regional Station, Karnal 132001, India;
| | - Ningthai Longmei
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Bhupender Kumar
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Bahadur Singh Jat
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Manesh Chander Dagla
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Bharat Bhushan
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Sumit Kumar Aggarwal
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Pravin Kumar Bagaria
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Ankush Sharma
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| | - Shyam Bir Singh
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana 141004, India; (P.K.); (N.L.); (B.K.); (B.S.J.); (M.C.D.); (B.B.); (S.K.A.); (P.K.B.); (A.S.); (S.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kristensen PS, Sarup P, Fé D, Orabi J, Snell P, Ripa L, Mohlfeld M, Chu TT, Herrström J, Jahoor A, Jensen J. Prediction of additive, epistatic, and dominance effects using models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines of hybrid rye and sugar beet. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 14:1193433. [PMID: 38162304 PMCID: PMC10756082 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1193433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Genomic models for prediction of additive and non-additive effects within and across different heterotic groups are lacking for breeding of hybrid crops. In this study, genomic prediction models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines from two different heterotic groups were developed and evaluated. The models can be used for prediction of general combining ability (GCA) of parental lines from each heterotic group as well as specific combining ability (SCA) of all realized and potential crosses. Here, GCA was estimated as the sum of additive genetic effects and within-group epistasis due to high degree of inbreeding in parental lines. SCA was estimated as the sum of across-group epistasis and dominance effects. Three models were compared. In model 1, it was assumed that each hybrid was produced from two completely inbred parental lines. Model 1 was extended to include three-way hybrids from parental lines with arbitrary levels of inbreeding: In model 2, parents of the three-way hybrids could have any levels of inbreeding, while the grandparents of the maternal parent were assumed completely inbred. In model 3, all parental components could have any levels of inbreeding. Data from commercial breeding programs for hybrid rye and sugar beet was used to evaluate the models. The traits grain yield and root yield were analyzed for rye and sugar beet, respectively. Additive genetic variances were larger than epistatic and dominance variances. The models' predictive abilities for total genetic value, for GCA of each parental line and for SCA were evaluated based on different cross-validation strategies. Predictive abilities were highest for total genetic values and lowest for SCA. Predictive abilities for SCA and for GCA of maternal lines were higher for model 2 and model 3 than for model 1. The implementation of the genomic prediction models in hybrid breeding programs can potentially lead to increased genetic gain in two different ways: I) by facilitating the selection of crossing parents with high GCA within heterotic groups and II) by prediction of SCA of all realized and potential combinations of parental lines to produce hybrids with high total genetic values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pernille Sarup
- Research and Development, Nordic Seed A/S, Odder, Denmark
| | - Dario Fé
- Research Division, DLF Seeds A/S, Store Heddinge, Denmark
| | - Jihad Orabi
- Research and Development, Nordic Seed A/S, Odder, Denmark
| | - Per Snell
- Research and Development, DLF Beet Seed AB, Landskrona, Sweden
| | - Linda Ripa
- Research and Development, DLF Beet Seed AB, Landskrona, Sweden
| | | | - Thinh Tuan Chu
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Ahmed Jahoor
- Research and Development, Nordic Seed A/S, Odder, Denmark
- Breeding, Nordic Seed Germany GmbH, Nienstädt, Germany
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Just Jensen
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cui L, Yang B, Xiao S, Gao J, Baud A, Graham D, McBride M, Dominiczak A, Schafer S, Aumatell RL, Mont C, Teruel AF, Hübner N, Flint J, Mott R, Huang L. Dominance is common in mammals and is associated with trans-acting gene expression and alternative splicing. Genome Biol 2023; 24:215. [PMID: 37773188 PMCID: PMC10540365 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03060-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dominance and other non-additive genetic effects arise from the interaction between alleles, and historically these phenomena play a major role in quantitative genetics. However, most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) assume alleles act additively. RESULTS We systematically investigate both dominance-here representing any non-additive within-locus interaction-and additivity across 574 physiological and gene expression traits in three mammalian stocks: F2 intercross pigs, rat heterogeneous stock, and mice heterogeneous stock. Dominance accounts for about one quarter of heritable variance across all physiological traits in all species. Hematological and immunological traits exhibit the highest dominance variance, possibly reflecting balancing selection in response to pathogens. Although most quantitative trait loci (QTLs) are detectable as additive QTLs, we identify 154, 64, and 62 novel dominance QTLs in pigs, rats, and mice respectively that are undetectable as additive QTLs. Similarly, even though most cis-acting expression QTLs are additive, gene expression exhibits a large fraction of dominance variance, and trans-acting eQTLs are enriched for dominance. Genes causal for dominance physiological QTLs are less likely to be physically linked to their QTLs but instead act via trans-acting dominance eQTLs. In addition, thousands of eQTLs are associated with alternatively spliced isoforms with complex additive and dominant architectures in heterogeneous stock rats, suggesting a possible mechanism for dominance. CONCLUSIONS Although heritability is predominantly additive, many mammalian genetic effects are dominant and likely arise through distinct mechanisms. It is therefore advantageous to consider both additive and dominance effects in GWAS to improve power and uncover causality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Cui
- National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China
- UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Human Aging Research Institute and School of Life Science, Nanchang University, and Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Human Aging, Jiangxi, China
- School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Bin Yang
- National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China
| | - Shijun Xiao
- National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Gao
- National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China
| | - Amelie Baud
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Delyth Graham
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Martin McBride
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Anna Dominiczak
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Sebastian Schafer
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Regina Lopez Aumatell
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carme Mont
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Albert Fernandez Teruel
- Departamento de Psiquiatría y Medicina Legal, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Norbert Hübner
- Genetics and Genomics of Cardiovascular Diseases Research Group, Max Delbrück Center (MDC) for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jonathan Flint
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard Mott
- UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Lusheng Huang
- National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choquette NE, Weldekidan T, Brewer J, Davis SB, Wisser RJ, Holland JB. Enhancing adaptation of tropical maize to temperate environments using genomic selection. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2023; 13:jkad141. [PMID: 37368984 PMCID: PMC10468305 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Tropical maize can be used to diversify the genetic base of temperate germplasm and help create climate-adapted cultivars. However, tropical maize is unadapted to temperate environments, in which sensitivities to long photoperiods and cooler temperatures result in severely delayed flowering times, developmental defects, and little to no yield. Overcoming this maladaptive syndrome can require a decade of phenotypic selection in a targeted, temperate environment. To accelerate the incorporation of tropical diversity in temperate breeding pools, we tested if an additional generation of genomic selection can be used in an off-season nursery where phenotypic selection is not very effective. Prediction models were trained using flowering time recorded on random individuals in separate lineages of a heterogenous population grown at two northern U.S. latitudes. Direct phenotypic selection and genomic prediction model training was performed within each target environment and lineage, followed by genomic prediction of random intermated progenies in the off-season nursery. Performance of genomic prediction models was evaluated on self-fertilized progenies of prediction candidates grown in both target locations in the following summer season. Prediction abilities ranged from 0.30 to 0.40 among populations and evaluation environments. Prediction models with varying marker effect distributions or spatial field effects had similar accuracies. Our results suggest that genomic selection in a single off-season generation could increase genetic gains for flowering time by more than 50% compared to direct selection in summer seasons only, reducing the time required to change the population mean to an acceptably adapted flowering time by about one-third to one-half.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E Choquette
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | | | - Jason Brewer
- USDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Scott B Davis
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
| | - Randall J Wisser
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
- Laboratoire d’Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environmentaux, INRAE, University of Montpellier, L’Institut Agro, Montpellier, FR 34000, USA
| | - James B Holland
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- USDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sun S, Wang B, Li C, Xu G, Yang J, Hufford MB, Ross-Ibarra J, Wang H, Wang L. Unraveling Prevalence and Effects of Deleterious Mutations in Maize Elite Lines across Decades of Modern Breeding. Mol Biol Evol 2023; 40:msad170. [PMID: 37494285 PMCID: PMC10414807 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Future breeding is likely to involve the detection and removal of deleterious alleles, which are mutations that negatively affect crop fitness. However, little is known about the prevalence of such mutations and their effects on phenotypic traits in the context of modern crop breeding. To address this, we examined the number and frequency of deleterious mutations in 350 elite maize inbred lines developed over the past few decades in China and the United States. Our findings reveal an accumulation of weakly deleterious mutations and a decrease in strongly deleterious mutations, indicating the dominant effects of genetic drift and purifying selection for the two types of mutations, respectively. We also discovered that slightly deleterious mutations, when at lower frequencies, were more likely to be heterozygous in the developed hybrids. This is consistent with complementation as a potential explanation for heterosis. Subsequently, we found that deleterious mutations accounted for more of the variation in phenotypic traits than nondeleterious mutations with matched minor allele frequencies, especially for traits related to leaf angle and flowering time. Moreover, we detected fewer deleterious mutations in the promoter and gene body regions of differentially expressed genes across breeding eras than in nondifferentially expressed genes. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive assessment of the prevalence and impact of deleterious mutations in modern maize breeding and establish a useful baseline for future maize improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shichao Sun
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Baobao Wang
- Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Changyu Li
- Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Gen Xu
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Jinliang Yang
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Matthew B Hufford
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Haiyang Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Wang
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
- Kunpeng Institute of Modern Agriculture at Foshan, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Foshan, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khaipho-Burch M, Ferebee T, Giri A, Ramstein G, Monier B, Yi E, Romay MC, Buckler ES. Elucidating the patterns of pleiotropy and its biological relevance in maize. PLoS Genet 2023; 19:e1010664. [PMID: 36943844 PMCID: PMC10030035 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Pleiotropy-when a single gene controls two or more seemingly unrelated traits-has been shown to impact genes with effects on flowering time, leaf architecture, and inflorescence morphology in maize. However, the genome-wide impact of biological pleiotropy across all maize phenotypes is largely unknown. Here, we investigate the extent to which biological pleiotropy impacts phenotypes within maize using GWAS summary statistics reanalyzed from previously published metabolite, field, and expression phenotypes across the Nested Association Mapping population and Goodman Association Panel. Through phenotypic saturation of 120,597 traits, we obtain over 480 million significant quantitative trait nucleotides. We estimate that only 1.56-32.3% of intervals show some degree of pleiotropy. We then assess the relationship between pleiotropy and various biological features such as gene expression, chromatin accessibility, sequence conservation, and enrichment for gene ontology terms. We find very little relationship between pleiotropy and these variables when compared to permuted pleiotropy. We hypothesize that biological pleiotropy of common alleles is not widespread in maize and is highly impacted by nuisance terms such as population structure and linkage disequilibrium. Natural selection on large standing natural variation in maize populations may target wide and large effect variants, leaving the prevalence of detectable pleiotropy relatively low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Taylor Ferebee
- Department of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Anju Giri
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Guillaume Ramstein
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brandon Monier
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Emily Yi
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - M Cinta Romay
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- USDA-ARS, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ramstein GP, Buckler ES. Prediction of evolutionary constraint by genomic annotations improves functional prioritization of genomic variants in maize. Genome Biol 2022; 23:183. [PMID: 36050782 PMCID: PMC9438327 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02747-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Crop improvement through cross-population genomic prediction and genome editing requires identification of causal variants at high resolution, within fewer than hundreds of base pairs. Most genetic mapping studies have generally lacked such resolution. In contrast, evolutionary approaches can detect genetic effects at high resolution, but they are limited by shifting selection, missing data, and low depth of multiple-sequence alignments. Here we use genomic annotations to accurately predict nucleotide conservation across angiosperms, as a proxy for fitness effect of mutations. Results Using only sequence analysis, we annotate nonsynonymous mutations in 25,824 maize gene models, with information from bioinformatics and deep learning. Our predictions are validated by experimental information: within-species conservation, chromatin accessibility, and gene expression. According to gene ontology and pathway enrichment analyses, predicted nucleotide conservation points to genes in central carbon metabolism. Importantly, it improves genomic prediction for fitness-related traits such as grain yield, in elite maize panels, by stringent prioritization of fewer than 1% of single-site variants. Conclusions Our results suggest that predicting nucleotide conservation across angiosperms may effectively prioritize sites most likely to impact fitness-related traits in crops, without being limited by shifting selection, missing data, and low depth of multiple-sequence alignments. Our approach—Prediction of mutation Impact by Calibrated Nucleotide Conservation (PICNC)—could be useful to select polymorphisms for accurate genomic prediction, and candidate mutations for efficient base editing. The trained PICNC models and predicted nucleotide conservation at protein-coding SNPs in maize are publicly available in CyVerse (10.25739/hybz-2957). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13059-022-02747-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume P Ramstein
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. .,Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.,USDA-ARS, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheng W, Ramachandran S, Crawford L. Uncertainty quantification in variable selection for genetic fine-mapping using bayesian neural networks. iScience 2022; 25:104553. [PMID: 35769876 PMCID: PMC9234235 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new approach for variable selection using a collection of Bayesian neural networks with a focus on quantifying uncertainty over which variables are selected. Motivated by fine-mapping applications in statistical genetics, we refer to our framework as an "ensemble of single-effect neural networks" (ESNN) which generalizes the "sum of single effects" regression framework by both accounting for nonlinear structure in genotypic data (e.g., dominance effects) and having the capability to model discrete phenotypes (e.g., case-control studies). Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate our method's ability to produce calibrated posterior summaries such as credible sets and posterior inclusion probabilities, particularly for traits with genetic architectures that have significant proportions of non-additive variation driven by correlated variants. Lastly, we use real data to demonstrate that the ESNN framework improves upon the state of the art for identifying true effect variables underlying various complex traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Cheng
- Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sohini Ramachandran
- Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Lorin Crawford
- Center for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Microsoft Research New England, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu D, Li X, Tanaka R, Wood JC, Tibbs-Cortes LE, Magallanes-Lundback M, Bornowski N, Hamilton JP, Vaillancourt B, Diepenbrock CH, Li X, Deason NT, Schoenbaum GR, Yu J, Buell CR, DellaPenna D, Gore MA. Combining GWAS and TWAS to identify candidate causal genes for tocochromanol levels in maize grain. Genetics 2022; 221:6603118. [PMID: 35666198 PMCID: PMC9339294 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Tocochromanols (tocopherols and tocotrienols, collectively vitamin E) are lipid-soluble antioxidants important for both plant fitness and human health. The main dietary sources of vitamin E are seed oils that often accumulate high levels of tocopherol isoforms with lower vitamin E activity. The tocochromanol biosynthetic pathway is conserved across plant species but an integrated view of the genes and mechanisms underlying natural variation of tocochromanol levels in seed of most cereal crops remains limited. To address this issue, we utilized the high mapping resolution of the maize Ames panel of ∼1,500 inbred lines scored with 12.2 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms to generate metabolomic (mature grain tocochromanols) and transcriptomic (developing grain) data sets for genetic mapping. By combining results from genome- and transcriptome-wide association studies, we identified a total of 13 candidate causal gene loci, including 5 that had not been previously associated with maize grain tocochromanols: 4 biosynthetic genes (arodeH2 paralog, dxs1, vte5, and vte7) and a plastid S-adenosyl methionine transporter (samt1). Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping of these 13 gene loci revealed that they are predominantly regulated by cis-eQTL. Through a joint statistical analysis, we implicated cis-acting variants as responsible for colocalized eQTL and GWAS association signals. Our multiomics approach provided increased statistical power and mapping resolution to enable a detailed characterization of the genetic and regulatory architecture underlying tocochromanol accumulation in maize grain and provided insights for ongoing biofortification efforts to breed and/or engineer vitamin E and antioxidant levels in maize and other cereals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joshua C Wood
- Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, & Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | | | - Maria Magallanes-Lundback
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Nolan Bornowski
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - John P Hamilton
- Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, & Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Brieanne Vaillancourt
- Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, & Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | | | - Xianran Li
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Wheat Health, Genetics, and Quality Research Unit, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
| | - Nicholas T Deason
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | | | - Jianming Yu
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
| | - C Robin Buell
- Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, & Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Dean DellaPenna
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Michael A Gore
- Corresponding author: Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roth M, Beugnot A, Mary-Huard T, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Fiévet JB. Improving genomic predictions with inbreeding and nonadditive effects in two admixed maize hybrid populations in single and multienvironment contexts. Genetics 2022; 220:6527635. [PMID: 35150258 PMCID: PMC8982028 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic admixture, resulting from the recombination between structural groups, is frequently encountered in breeding populations. In hybrid breeding, crossing admixed lines can generate substantial nonadditive genetic variance and contrasted levels of inbreeding which can impact trait variation. This study aimed at testing recent methodological developments for the modeling of inbreeding and nonadditive effects in order to increase prediction accuracy in admixed populations. Using two maize (Zea mays L.) populations of hybrids admixed between dent and flint heterotic groups, we compared a suite of five genomic prediction models incorporating (or not) parameters accounting for inbreeding and nonadditive effects with the natural and orthogonal interaction approach in single and multienvironment contexts. In both populations, variance decompositions showed the strong impact of inbreeding on plant yield, height, and flowering time which was supported by the superiority of prediction models incorporating this effect (+0.038 in predictive ability for mean yield). In most cases dominance variance was reduced when inbreeding was accounted for. The model including additivity, dominance, epistasis, and inbreeding effects appeared to be the most robust for prediction across traits and populations (+0.054 in predictive ability for mean yield). In a multienvironment context, we found that the inclusion of nonadditive and inbreeding effects was advantageous when predicting hybrids not yet observed in any environment. Overall, comparing variance decompositions was helpful to guide model selection for genomic prediction. Finally, we recommend the use of models including inbreeding and nonadditive parameters following the natural and orthogonal interaction approach to increase prediction accuracy in admixed populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgane Roth
- Plant Breeding Research Division, Agroscope, Wädenswil, 8820 Zurich, Switzerland,Corresponding author: INRAE GAFL, 67 Allée des Chênes 84140 Montfavet, France.
| | - Aurélien Beugnot
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, UMR GQE-Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Tristan Mary-Huard
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, UMR GQE-Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France,Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR MIA-Paris Paris, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Moreau
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, UMR GQE-Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Alain Charcosset
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, UMR GQE-Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Julie B Fiévet
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, UMR GQE-Le Moulon, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Coelho de Sousa I, Nascimento M, de Castro Sant’anna I, Teixeira Caixeta E, Ferreira Azevedo C, Damião Cruz C, Lopes da Silva F, Ruas Alkimim E, Campana Nascimento AC, Vergara Lopes Serão N. Marker effects and heritability estimates using additive-dominance genomic architectures via artificial neural networks in Coffea canephora. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262055. [PMID: 35081139 PMCID: PMC8791507 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Many methodologies are used to predict the genetic merit in animals and plants, but some of them require priori assumptions that may increase the complexity of the model. Artificial neural network (ANN) has advantage to not require priori assumptions about the relationships between inputs and the output allowing great flexibility to handle different types of complex non-additive effects, such as dominance and epistasis. Despite this advantage, the biological interpretability of ANNs is still limited. The aim of this research was to estimate the heritability and markers effects for two traits in Coffea canephora using an additive-dominance architecture ANN and to compare it with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). The data used consists of 51 clones of C. canephora varietal Conilon, 32 of varietal group Robusta and 82 intervarietal hybrids. From this, 165 phenotyped individuals were genotyped for 14,387 SNPs. Due to the high computational cost of ANNs, we used Bagging decision tree to reduce the dimensionality of the data, selecting the markers that accumulated 70% of the total importance. An ANN with three hidden layers was run, each varying from 1 to 40 neurons summing 64,000 neural networks. The network architectures with the best predictive ability were selected. The best architectures were composed by 4, 15, and 33 neurons in the first, second and third hidden layers, respectively, for yield, and by 13, 20, and 24 neurons, respectively for rust resistance. The predictive ability was greater when using ANN with three hidden layers than using one hidden layer and GBLUP, with 0.72 and 0.88 for yield and coffee leaf rust resistance, respectively. The concordance rate (CR) of the 10% larger markers effects among the methods varied between 10% and 13.8%, for additive effects and between 5.4% and 11.9% for dominance effects. The narrow-sense ([Formula: see text]) and dominance-only ([Formula: see text]) heritability estimates were 0.25 and 0.06, respectively, for yield, and 0.67 and 0.03, respectively for rust resistance. The ANN was able to estimate the heritabilities from an additive-dominance genomic architectures and the ANN with three hidden layers obtained best predictive ability when compared with those obtained from GBLUP and ANN with one hidden layer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ithalo Coelho de Sousa
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America
- Department of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Moysés Nascimento
- Department of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Isabela de Castro Sant’anna
- Rubber Tree and Agroforestry Systems Research Center, Campinas Agronomy Institute (IAC), Votuporanga, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Cosme Damião Cruz
- Department of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Felipe Lopes da Silva
- Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thumma BR, Joyce KR, Jacobs A. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens. G3 GENES|GENOMES|GENETICS 2022; 12:6423988. [PMID: 34791210 PMCID: PMC8728041 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is being increasingly adopted by the tree breeding community. Most of the GS studies in trees are focused on estimating additive genetic effects. Exploiting the dominance effects offers additional opportunities to improve genetic gain. To detect dominance effects, trait-relevant markers may be important compared to nonselected markers. Here, we used preselected markers to study the dominance effects in a Eucalyptus nitens (E. nitens) breeding population consisting of open-pollinated (OP) and controlled-pollinated (CP) families. We used 8221 trees from six progeny trials in this study. Of these, 868 progeny and 255 parents were genotyped with the E. nitens marker panel. Three traits; diameter at breast height (DBH), wood basic density (DEN), and kraft pulp yield (KPY) were analyzed. Two types of genomic relationship matrices based on identity-by-state (IBS) and identity-by-descent (IBD) were tested. Performance of the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models with IBS and IBD matrices were compared with pedigree-based additive best linear unbiased prediction (ABLUP) models with and without the pedigree reconstruction. Similarly, the performance of the single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) with IBS and IBD matrices were compared with ABLUP models using all 8221 trees. Significant dominance effects were observed with the GBLUP-AD model for DBH. The predictive ability of DBH is higher with the GBLUP-AD model compared to other models. Similarly, the prediction accuracy of genotypic values is higher with GBLUP-AD compared to the GBLUP-A model. Among the two GBLUP models (IBS and IBD), no differences were observed in predictive abilities and prediction accuracies. While the estimates of predictive ability with additive effects were similar among all four models, prediction accuracies of ABLUP were lower than the GBLUP models. The prediction accuracy of ssGBLUP-IBD is higher than the other three models while the theoretical accuracy of ssGBLUP-IBS is consistently higher than the other three models across all three groups tested (parents, genotyped, and nongenotyped). Significant inbreeding depression was observed for DBH and KPY. While there is a linear relationship between inbreeding and DBH, the relationship between inbreeding and KPY is nonlinear and quadratic. These results indicate that the inbreeding depression of DBH is mainly due to directional dominance while in KPY it may be due to epistasis. Inbreeding depression may be the main source of the observed dominance effects in DBH. The significant dominance effect observed for DBH may be used to select complementary parents to improve the genetic merit of the progeny in E. nitens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bala R Thumma
- Gondwana Genomics Pty Ltd , Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu D, Tanaka R, Li X, Ramstein GP, Cu S, Hamilton JP, Buell CR, Stangoulis J, Rocheford T, Gore MA. High-resolution genome-wide association study pinpoints metal transporter and chelator genes involved in the genetic control of element levels in maize grain. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2021; 11:6156830. [PMID: 33677522 PMCID: PMC8759812 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Despite its importance to plant function and human health, the genetics underpinning element levels in maize grain remain largely unknown. Through a genome-wide association study in the maize Ames panel of nearly 2,000 inbred lines that was imputed with ∼7.7 million SNP markers, we investigated the genetic basis of natural variation for the concentration of 11 elements in grain. Novel associations were detected for the metal transporter genes rte2 (rotten ear2) and irt1 (iron-regulated transporter1) with boron and nickel, respectively. We also further resolved loci that were previously found to be associated with one or more of five elements (copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, and/or zinc), with two metal chelator and five metal transporter candidate causal genes identified. The nas5 (nicotianamine synthase5) gene involved in the synthesis of nicotianamine, a metal chelator, was found associated with both zinc and iron and suggests a common genetic basis controlling the accumulation of these two metals in the grain. Furthermore, moderate predictive abilities were obtained for the 11 elemental grain phenotypes with two whole-genome prediction models: Bayesian Ridge Regression (0.33–0.51) and BayesB (0.33–0.53). Of the two models, BayesB, with its greater emphasis on large-effect loci, showed ∼4–10% higher predictive abilities for nickel, molybdenum, and copper. Altogether, our findings contribute to an improved genotype-phenotype map for grain element accumulation in maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Wu
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Ryokei Tanaka
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Xiaowei Li
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | | | - Suong Cu
- College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - John P Hamilton
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - C Robin Buell
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - James Stangoulis
- College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Torbert Rocheford
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Michael A Gore
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rogers AR, Dunne JC, Romay C, Bohn M, Buckler ES, Ciampitti IA, Edwards J, Ertl D, Flint-Garcia S, Gore MA, Graham C, Hirsch CN, Hood E, Hooker DC, Knoll J, Lee EC, Lorenz A, Lynch JP, McKay J, Moose SP, Murray SC, Nelson R, Rocheford T, Schnable JC, Schnable PS, Sekhon R, Singh M, Smith M, Springer N, Thelen K, Thomison P, Thompson A, Tuinstra M, Wallace J, Wisser RJ, Xu W, Gilmour AR, Kaeppler SM, De Leon N, Holland JB. The importance of dominance and genotype-by-environment interactions on grain yield variation in a large-scale public cooperative maize experiment. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2021; 11:6062399. [PMID: 33585867 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaa050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
High-dimensional and high-throughput genomic, field performance, and environmental data are becoming increasingly available to crop breeding programs, and their integration can facilitate genomic prediction within and across environments and provide insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits and the nature of genotype-by-environment interactions. To partition trait variation into additive and dominance (main effect) genetic and corresponding genetic-by-environment variances, and to identify specific environmental factors that influence genotype-by-environment interactions, we curated and analyzed genotypic and phenotypic data on 1918 maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and environmental data from 65 testing environments. For grain yield, dominance variance was similar in magnitude to additive variance, and genetic-by-environment variances were more important than genetic main effect variances. Models involving both additive and dominance relationships best fit the data and modeling unique genetic covariances among all environments provided the best characterization of the genotype-by-environment interaction patterns. Similarity of relative hybrid performance among environments was modeled as a function of underlying weather variables, permitting identification of weather covariates driving correlations of genetic effects across environments. The resulting models can be used for genomic prediction of mean hybrid performance across populations of environments tested or for environment-specific predictions. These results can also guide efforts to incorporate high-throughput environmental data into genomic prediction models and predict values in new environments characterized with the same environmental characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R Rogers
- Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Dunne
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Cinta Romay
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Martin Bohn
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.,USDA-ARS Plant, Soil, and Nutrition Research Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | | | - Jode Edwards
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.,USDA-ARS Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
| | - David Ertl
- Iowa Corn Promotion Board, Johnston, IA 50131, USA
| | - Sherry Flint-Garcia
- USDA-ARS Plant Genetics Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| | - Michael A Gore
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Christopher Graham
- Plant Science Department, West River Agricultural Center, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD 57769, USA
| | - Candice N Hirsch
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hood
- College of Agriculture, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467, USA
| | - David C Hooker
- Department of Plant Agriculture, Ridgetown Campus, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
| | - Joseph Knoll
- USDA-ARS Crop Genetics and Breeding Research Unit, Tifton, GA 31793, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Lee
- Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Aaron Lorenz
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - Jonathan P Lynch
- Department of Plant Science, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - John McKay
- Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Stephen P Moose
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Seth C Murray
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Rebecca Nelson
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Torbert Rocheford
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - James C Schnable
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
| | - Patrick S Schnable
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.,Plant Sciences Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
| | - Rajandeep Sekhon
- Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
| | - Maninder Singh
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Margaret Smith
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Nathan Springer
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
| | - Kurt Thelen
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - Peter Thomison
- Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Addie Thompson
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - Mitch Tuinstra
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Jason Wallace
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
| | - Randall J Wisser
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
| | - Wenwei Xu
- Texas A& M AgriLife Research, Texas A& M University, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA
| | | | - Shawn M Kaeppler
- Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Natalia De Leon
- Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - James B Holland
- Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.,Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.,USDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fritsche-Neto R, Galli G, Borges KLR, Costa-Neto G, Alves FC, Sabadin F, Lyra DH, Morais PPP, Braatz de Andrade LR, Granato I, Crossa J. Optimizing Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Small-Scale Maize Hybrid Breeding Programs: A Roadmap Review. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:658267. [PMID: 34276721 PMCID: PMC8281958 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The usefulness of genomic prediction (GP) for many animal and plant breeding programs has been highlighted for many studies in the last 20 years. In maize breeding programs, mostly dedicated to delivering more highly adapted and productive hybrids, this approach has been proved successful for both large- and small-scale breeding programs worldwide. Here, we present some of the strategies developed to improve the accuracy of GP in tropical maize, focusing on its use under low budget and small-scale conditions achieved for most of the hybrid breeding programs in developing countries. We highlight the most important outcomes obtained by the University of São Paulo (USP, Brazil) and how they can improve the accuracy of prediction in tropical maize hybrids. Our roadmap starts with the efforts for germplasm characterization, moving on to the practices for mating design, and the selection of the genotypes that are used to compose the training population in field phenotyping trials. Factors including population structure and the importance of non-additive effects (dominance and epistasis) controlling the desired trait are also outlined. Finally, we explain how the source of the molecular markers, environmental, and the modeling of genotype-environment interaction can affect the accuracy of GP. Results of 7 years of research in a public maize hybrid breeding program under tropical conditions are discussed, and with the great advances that have been made, we find that what is yet to come is exciting. The use of open-source software for the quality control of molecular markers, implementing GP, and envirotyping pipelines may reduce costs in an efficient computational manner. We conclude that exploring new models/tools using high-throughput phenotyping data along with large-scale envirotyping may bring more resolution and realism when predicting genotype performances. Despite the initial costs, mostly for genotyping, the GP platforms in combination with these other data sources can be a cost-effective approach for predicting the performance of maize hybrids for a large set of growing conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Fritsche-Neto
- Laboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Giovanni Galli
- Laboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Karina Lima Reis Borges
- Laboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Germano Costa-Neto
- Laboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Filipe Couto Alves
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Felipe Sabadin
- Laboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Danilo Hottis Lyra
- Department of Computational and Analytical Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Italo Granato
- Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux (LEPSE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Univ. Montpellier, SupAgro, Montpellier, France
| | - Jose Crossa
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México - Veracruz, Texcoco, Mexico
- Colegio de Posgraduado, Montecillo, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diepenbrock CH, Ilut DC, Magallanes-Lundback M, Kandianis CB, Lipka AE, Bradbury PJ, Holland JB, Hamilton JP, Wooldridge E, Vaillancourt B, Góngora-Castillo E, Wallace JG, Cepela J, Mateos-Hernandez M, Owens BF, Tiede T, Buckler ES, Rocheford T, Buell CR, Gore MA, DellaPenna D. Eleven biosynthetic genes explain the majority of natural variation in carotenoid levels in maize grain. THE PLANT CELL 2021; 33:882-900. [PMID: 33681994 PMCID: PMC8226291 DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koab032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Vitamin A deficiency remains prevalent in parts of Asia, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa where maize (Zea mays) is a food staple. Extensive natural variation exists for carotenoids in maize grain. Here, to understand its genetic basis, we conducted a joint linkage and genome-wide association study of the US maize nested association mapping panel. Eleven of the 44 detected quantitative trait loci (QTL) were resolved to individual genes. Six of these were correlated expression and effect QTL (ceeQTL), showing strong correlations between RNA-seq expression abundances and QTL allelic effect estimates across six stages of grain development. These six ceeQTL also had the largest percentage of phenotypic variance explained, and in major part comprised the three to five loci capturing the bulk of genetic variation for each trait. Most of these ceeQTL had strongly correlated QTL allelic effect estimates across multiple traits. These findings provide an in-depth genome-level understanding of the genetic and molecular control of carotenoids in plants. In addition, these findings provide a roadmap to accelerate breeding for provitamin A and other priority carotenoid traits in maize grain that should be readily extendable to other cereals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel C Ilut
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
| | - Maria Magallanes-Lundback
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
| | - Catherine B Kandianis
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Alexander E Lipka
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Peter J Bradbury
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
- United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, New York 14853
| | - James B Holland
- United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Plant Science Research Unit, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
| | - John P Hamilton
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
| | - Edmund Wooldridge
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Brieanne Vaillancourt
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
| | - Elsa Góngora-Castillo
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Jason G Wallace
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
| | - Jason Cepela
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Maria Mateos-Hernandez
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Brenda F Owens
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Tyler Tiede
- Present addresses: Nacre Innovations, Houston, Texas 77002 (C.B.K.); Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 (A.E.L.); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (E.W.); Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatan, CONACYT—Unidad de Biotecnologia, Merida, Yucatan 97200, Mexico (E.G.-C.); Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (J.C.); Bayer, Stonington, Illinois 62567 (M.M.-H.); BASF, Dawson, Georgia 39842 (B.F.O.); and Corteva Agriscience, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 (T.T.)
| | - Edward S Buckler
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
- Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
- United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, New York 14853
| | - Torbert Rocheford
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
| | - C Robin Buell
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
| | - Michael A Gore
- Authors for correspondence: (C.H.D.), (M.A.G.), and (D.D.P.)
| | - Dean DellaPenna
- Authors for correspondence: (C.H.D.), (M.A.G.), and (D.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
González-Diéguez D, Legarra A, Charcosset A, Moreau L, Lehermeier C, Teyssèdre S, Vitezica ZG. Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis. Genetics 2021; 218:iyab026. [PMID: 33864072 PMCID: PMC8128411 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
We revisited, in a genomic context, the theory of hybrid genetic evaluation models of hybrid crosses of pure lines, as the current practice is largely based on infinitesimal model assumptions. Expressions for covariances between hybrids due to additive substitution effects and dominance and epistatic deviations were analytically derived. Using dense markers in a GBLUP analysis, it is possible to split specific combining ability into dominance and across-groups epistatic deviations, and to split general combining ability (GCA) into within-line additive effects and within-line additive by additive (and higher order) epistatic deviations. We analyzed a publicly available maize data set of Dent × Flint hybrids using our new model (called GCA-model) up to additive by additive epistasis. To model higher order interactions within GCAs, we also fitted "residual genetic" line effects. Our new GCA-model was compared with another genomic model which assumes a uniquely defined effect of genes across origins. Most variation in hybrids is accounted by GCA. Variances due to dominance and epistasis have similar magnitudes. Models based on defining effects either differently or identically across heterotic groups resulted in similar predictive abilities for hybrids. The currently used model inflates the estimated additive genetic variance. This is not important for hybrid predictions but has consequences for the breeding scheme-e.g. overestimation of the genetic gain within heterotic group. Therefore, we recommend using GCA-model, which is appropriate for genomic prediction and variance component estimation in hybrid crops using genomic data, and whose results can be practically interpreted and used for breeding purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrés Legarra
- INRAE, INP, UMR 1388 GenPhySE, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - Alain Charcosset
- GQE-Le Moulon, INRAE, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Laurence Moreau
- GQE-Le Moulon, INRAE, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Knoch D, Werner CR, Meyer RC, Riewe D, Abbadi A, Lücke S, Snowdon RJ, Altmann T. Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2021; 134:1147-1165. [PMID: 33523261 PMCID: PMC7973648 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03759-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Complementing or replacing genetic markers with transcriptomic data and use of reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression based on Gaussian kernels increases hybrid prediction accuracies for complex agronomic traits in canola. In plant breeding, hybrids gained particular importance due to heterosis, the superior performance of offspring compared to their inbred parents. Since the development of new top performing hybrids requires labour-intensive and costly breeding programmes, including testing of large numbers of experimental hybrids, the prediction of hybrid performance is of utmost interest to plant breeders. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of hybrid prediction models in spring-type oilseed rape (Brassica napus L./canola) employing different omics profiles, individually and in combination. To this end, a population of 950 F1 hybrids was evaluated for seed yield and six other agronomically relevant traits in commercial field trials at several locations throughout Europe. A subset of these hybrids was also evaluated in a climatized glasshouse regarding early biomass production. For each of the 477 parental rapeseed lines, 13,201 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 154 primary metabolites, and 19,479 transcripts were determined and used as predictive variables. Both, SNP markers and transcripts, effectively predict hybrid performance using (genomic) best linear unbiased prediction models (gBLUP). Compared to models using pure genetic markers, models incorporating transcriptome data resulted in significantly higher prediction accuracies for five out of seven agronomic traits, indicating that transcripts carry important information beyond genomic data. Notably, reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression based on Gaussian kernels significantly exceeded the predictive abilities of gBLUP models for six of the seven agronomic traits, demonstrating its potential for implementation in future canola breeding programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Knoch
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Seeland, OT Gatersleben Germany
| | - Christian R. Werner
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG Scotland, UK
| | - Rhonda C. Meyer
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Seeland, OT Gatersleben Germany
| | - David Riewe
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Seeland, OT Gatersleben Germany
- Institute for Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Product Protection, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI)—Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Amine Abbadi
- NPZ Innovation GmbH, Hohenlieth, 24363 Holtsee, Germany
- Norddeutsche Pflanzenzucht Hans-Georg Lembke KG, Hohenlieth, 24363 Holtsee, Germany
| | - Sophie Lücke
- Norddeutsche Pflanzenzucht Hans-Georg Lembke KG, Hohenlieth, 24363 Holtsee, Germany
| | - Rod J. Snowdon
- Department of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - Thomas Altmann
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Seeland, OT Gatersleben Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Technological developments have revolutionized measurements on plant genotypes and phenotypes, leading to routine production of large, complex data sets. This has led to increased efforts to extract meaning from these measurements and to integrate various data sets. Concurrently, machine learning has rapidly evolved and is now widely applied in science in general and in plant genotyping and phenotyping in particular. Here, we review the application of machine learning in the context of plant science and plant breeding. We focus on analyses at different phenotype levels, from biochemical to yield, and in connecting genotypes to these. In this way, we illustrate how machine learning offers a suite of methods that enable researchers to find meaningful patterns in relevant plant data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aalt Dirk Jan van Dijk
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, the Netherlands
- Biometris, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, the Netherlands
| | - Gert Kootstra
- Farm Technology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, the Netherlands
| | - Willem Kruijer
- Biometris, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, the Netherlands
| | - Dick de Ridder
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim MS, Lozano R, Kim JH, Bae DN, Kim ST, Park JH, Choi MS, Kim J, Ok HC, Park SK, Gore MA, Moon JK, Jeong SC. The patterns of deleterious mutations during the domestication of soybean. Nat Commun 2021; 12:97. [PMID: 33397978 PMCID: PMC7782591 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20337-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, soybean is a major protein and oil crop. Enhancing our understanding of the soybean domestication and improvement process helps boost genomics-assisted breeding efforts. Here we present a genome-wide variation map of 10.6 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms and 1.4 million indels for 781 soybean individuals which includes 418 domesticated (Glycine max), 345 wild (Glycine soja), and 18 natural hybrid (G. max/G. soja) accessions. We describe the enhanced detection of 183 domestication-selective sweeps and the patterns of putative deleterious mutations during domestication and improvement. This predominantly selfing species shows 7.1% reduction of overall deleterious mutations in domesticated soybean relative to wild soybean and a further 1.4% reduction from landrace to improved accessions. The detected domestication-selective sweeps also show reduced levels of deleterious alleles. Importantly, genotype imputation with this resource increases the mapping resolution of genome-wide association studies for seed protein and oil traits in a soybean diversity panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung-Shin Kim
- Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28116, Korea
- Plant Immunity Research Center, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - Roberto Lozano
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Ji Hong Kim
- Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28116, Korea
| | - Dong Nyuk Bae
- Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28116, Korea
| | - Sang-Tae Kim
- Department of Life Science, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, 14662, Korea
| | - Jung-Ho Park
- Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28116, Korea
| | - Man Soo Choi
- National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Korea
| | - Jaehyun Kim
- National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Korea
| | - Hyun-Choong Ok
- National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Korea
| | - Soo-Kwon Park
- National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Korea
| | - Michael A Gore
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Jung-Kyung Moon
- National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Korea.
- Agricultural Genome Center, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 55365, Korea.
| | - Soon-Chun Jeong
- Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28116, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Genomic Prediction Informed by Biological Processes Expands Our Understanding of the Genetic Architecture Underlying Free Amino Acid Traits in Dry Arabidopsis Seeds. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2020; 10:4227-4239. [PMID: 32978264 PMCID: PMC7642941 DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Plant growth, development, and nutritional quality depends upon amino acid homeostasis, especially in seeds. However, our understanding of the underlying genetics influencing amino acid content and composition remains limited, with only a few candidate genes and quantitative trait loci identified to date. Improved knowledge of the genetics and biological processes that determine amino acid levels will enable researchers to use this information for plant breeding and biological discovery. Toward this goal, we used genomic prediction to identify biological processes that are associated with, and therefore potentially influence, free amino acid (FAA) composition in seeds of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Markers were split into categories based on metabolic pathway annotations and fit using a genomic partitioning model to evaluate the influence of each pathway on heritability explained, model fit, and predictive ability. Selected pathways included processes known to influence FAA composition, albeit to an unknown degree, and spanned four categories: amino acid, core, specialized, and protein metabolism. Using this approach, we identified associations for pathways containing known variants for FAA traits, in addition to finding new trait-pathway associations. Markers related to amino acid metabolism, which are directly involved in FAA regulation, improved predictive ability for branched chain amino acids and histidine. The use of genomic partitioning also revealed patterns across biochemical families, in which serine-derived FAAs were associated with protein related annotations and aromatic FAAs were associated with specialized metabolic pathways. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that genomic partitioning is a viable strategy to uncover the relative contributions of biological processes to FAA traits in seeds, offering a promising framework to guide hypothesis testing and narrow the search space for candidate genes.
Collapse
|