The Coexistence of RAS and BRAF Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review

Concurrent NRAS-BRAF variants in metastatic colorectal cancer: a Tunisian case report

Target therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer needs the determination of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status to identify patients resistant to anti-EGFR treatment. RAS genes (KRAS/NRAS) are mutated in 40-60% of metastatic colorectal cancer and BRAF in 5-10%. The presence of a double mutation in RAS and BRAF is rare. Therefore, RAS and BRAF mutations were considered exclusive. Herein, we describe a novel concomitant NRAS/BRAF mutation identified in a series of 865 colorectal cancer patients.

ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1-3 Gene Fusions in Colorectal and Non-Colorectal Microsatellite-Unstable Cancers

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of actionable gene rearrangements in tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI). The detection of translocations involved tests for 5'/3'-end expression imbalance, variant-specific PCR and RNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Gene fusions were detected in 58/471 (12.3%) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs), 4/69 (5.8%) gastric cancers (GCs) and 3/65 (4.6%) endometrial cancers (ECs) (ALK: 8; RET: 12; NTRK1: 24; NTRK2: 2; NTRK3: 19), while none of these alterations were observed in five cervical carcinomas (CCs), four pancreatic cancers (PanCs), three cholangiocarcinomas (ChCs) and two ovarian cancers (OCs). The highest frequency of gene rearrangements was seen in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal carcinomas (53/204 (26%)). Surprisingly, as many as 5/267 (1.9%) KRAS/NRAS/BRAF-mutated CRCs also carried tyrosine kinase fusions. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) analysis of the fraction of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated gene copies in kinase-rearranged tumors indicated that there was simultaneous co-occurrence of two activating events in cancer cells, but not genetic mosaicism. CRC patients aged above 50 years had a strikingly higher frequency of translocations as compared to younger subjects (56/365 (15.3%) vs. 2/106 (1.9%), p = 0.002), and this difference was particularly pronounced for tumors with normal KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status (52/150 (34.7%) vs. 1/54 (1.9%), p = 0.001). There were no instances of MSI in 56 non-colorectal tumors carrying ALK, ROS1, RET or NTRK1 rearrangements. An analysis of tyrosine kinase gene translocations is particularly feasible in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type microsatellite-unstable CRCs, although other categories of tumors with MSI also demonstrate moderate occurrence of these events.

Clinical, Pathological and Molecular Insights on KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients from Northeastern Romania

Mutations in RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53 are well-established genetic abnormalities in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, limited information is available for patients from Eastern Europe, including Romania. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 104 mCRC patients from the Northeastern region of Romania to determine the frequency, distribution, coexistence, and clinicopathological and molecular correlations of these mutations. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (73.1%), followed by KRAS (45.2%) and PIK3CA (6.7%). Patients with KRAS mutant tumors and wild-type TP53 genotype were found to have no personal history of gastrointestinal cancer (p = 0.02, p = 0.007). KRAS mutations in exon 3 were associated with the female gender (p = 0.02) and the absence of lymph node invasion (p = 0.02). PIK3CA mutations were linked to the absence of lymph node invasion (p = 0.006). TP53 mutations were associated with KRAS mutations in exon 2 (p = 0.006), ulcerated histopathologic type (p = 0.04), and G2 differentiation (p = 0.01). It provides novel insights into genetic variations specific to the population from Northeastern Romania, which has been underrepresented in previous studies within Eastern Europe. Furthermore, our findings enable the development of genetic profiles in a developing country with limited access to specialized genetic tests and facilitate comparisons with other populations.

KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2 and MSI Status in a Large Consecutive Series of Colorectal Carcinomas

This study aimed to analyze clinical and regional factors influencing the distribution of actionable genetic alterations in a large consecutive series of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations, HER2 amplification and overexpression, and microsatellite instability (MSI) were tested in 8355 CRC samples. KRAS mutations were detected in 4137/8355 (49.5%) CRCs, with 3913 belonging to 10 common substitutions affecting codons 12/13/61/146, 174 being represented by 21 rare hot-spot variants, and 35 located outside the "hot" codons. KRAS Q61K substitution, which leads to the aberrant splicing of the gene, was accompanied by the second function-rescuing mutation in all 19 tumors analyzed. NRAS mutations were detected in 389/8355 (4.7%) CRCs (379 hot-spot and 10 non-hot-spot substitutions). BRAF mutations were identified in 556/8355 (6.7%) CRCs (codon 600: 510; codons 594-596: 38; codons 597-602: 8). The frequency of HER2 activation and MSI was 99/8008 (1.2%) and 432/8355 (5.2%), respectively. Some of the above events demonstrated differences in distribution according to patients' age and gender. In contrast to other genetic alterations, BRAF mutation frequencies were subject to geographic variation, with a relatively low incidence in areas with an apparently warmer climate (83/1726 (4.8%) in Southern Russia and North Caucasus vs. 473/6629 (7.1%) in other regions of Russia, p = 0.0007). The simultaneous presence of two drug targets, BRAF mutation and MSI, was observed in 117/8355 cases (1.4%). Combined alterations of two driver genes were detected in 28/8355 (0.3%) tumors (KRAS/NRAS: 8; KRAS/BRAF: 4; KRAS/HER2: 12; NRAS/HER2: 4). This study demonstrates that a substantial portion of RAS alterations is represented by atypical mutations, KRAS Q61K substitution is always accompanied by the second gene-rescuing mutation, BRAF mutation frequency is a subject to geographical variations, and a small fraction of CRCs has simultaneous alterations in more than one driver gene.

Concurrent RAS and RAS/BRAF V600E Variants in Colorectal Cancer: More Frequent Than Expected? A Case Report

The assessment of RAS and BRAF mutational status is one of the main steps in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Multiple mutations in the BRAF and RAS pathway are described as a rare event, with concurrent variants in KRAS and BRAF genes observed in approximately 0.05% of mCRC cases. Here, we report data from a case series affected by high-risk stage III and stage IV CRC and tested for RAS and BRAF mutation, treated at our Medical Oncology Unit. The analysis of KRAS, NRAS (codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, 146), and BRAF (codon 600) hotspot variants was performed in 161 CRC tumors from August 2018 to September 2021 and revealed three (1.8%) patients showing mutations in both KRAS and BRAF (V600E), including two cases with earlier CRC and one with metastatic disease. We also identified one patient (0.6%) with a mutation in both KRAS and NRAS genes and another one (0.6%) with a double KRAS mutation. Notably, the latter was characterized by aggressive behavior and poor clinical outcome. The mutational status, pathological features, and clinical history of these five CRC cases are described. Overall, this study case series adds evidence to the limited available literature concerning both the epidemiological and clinical aspects of CRC cases characterized by the presence of concurrent RAS/BRAF variants. Future multicentric studies will be required to increase the sample size and provide additional value to results observed so far in order to improve clinical management of this subgroup of CRC patients.

Liquid profiling of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: steps needed to achieve its full clinical value as standard care

The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is at the threshold of implementation into standard care for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, data about the clinical utility of liquid profiling (LP), its acceptance by clinicians, and its integration into clinical workflows in real‐world settings remain limited. Here, LP tests requested as part of routine care since 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Results show restrained request behavior that improved moderately over time, as well as reliable diagnostic performance comparable to translational studies, with an overall agreement of 91.7%. Extremely low ctDNA levels at < 0.1% in over 20% of cases, a high frequency of concomitant driver mutations (in up to 14% of cases), and ctDNA levels reflecting the clinical course of disease were revealed. However, certain limitations hampering successful translation of ctDNA into clinical practice were uncovered, including the lack of clinically relevant ctDNA thresholds, appropriate time points of LP requests, and integrative evaluation of ctDNA, imaging, and clinical findings. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential clinical value of LP for CRC patient management and demonstrate issues that need to be addressed for successful long‐term implementation in clinical workflows.

Biomarkers in colorectal liver metastases: Rising complexity and unknown clinical significance?

Surgical resection of the liver is the standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases, but 70% of patients still experience recurrence, resulting in limited survival. Molecular biomarkers promise guidance within the selection process of individualized treatment and provide better prognostic forecasting of recurrence and response to treatment. Presently, most investigated biomarkers include mutations of KRAS, BRAF, TP53, PIK3CA, APC, expression of Ki-67, and microsatellite instability. As some colorectal cancer tumors exhibit more than one molecular target, in line with a rising number of potential biomarkers, the complexity of their clinical implementation is rising steadily. Therefore, it is important to approach new insights into molecular biomarkers with explicit caution to their clinical applicability and significance, as there are contradictory results arising from multiple available studies and meta-analyses. This review helps to shed light on the complexity of promising biomarkers in both the prognosis and diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases.