Access to orthopedic care for children with medicaid versus private insurance in California

Site of Service Disparities Exist for Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The rate of outpatient total joint arthroplasty procedures, including those performed at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient departments, is increasing. The purpose of this study was to analyze if type of insurance is associated with site of service (in-patient vs outpatient) for total joint arthroplasty and adverse outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Current Procedural Terminology codes in a national administrative claims database. Eligible patients were stratified by type of insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, private). The primary outcome was site of service. Secondary outcomes included general complications, procedural complications, and revision procedures. We evaluated the associations using adjusted multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 951,568 patients for analysis; 46,703 (4.9%) patients underwent UKA, 607,221 (63.8%) underwent TKA, and 297,644 (31.3%) underwent THA. Overall, 9.6% of procedures were outpatient. Patients with Medicaid were less likely than privately insured patients to receive outpatient UKA or THA (UKA: odds ratio [OR], 0.729 [95% CI, 0.640-0.829]; THA: OR, 0.625 [95% CI, 0.557-0.702]) but more likely than patients with Medicare to receive outpatient TKA or THA (TKA: OR, 1.391 [95% CI, 1.315-1.472]; THA: OR, 1.327 [95% CI, 1.166-1.506]). Patients with Medicaid were more likely to experience complications and revision procedures.

CONCLUSION

Differences in site of service and complication rates following hip and knee arthroplasty exist based on type of insurance, suggesting a disparity in care. Further exploration of drivers of this disparity is warranted and can inform interventions (eg, progressive value-based payments) to support equity in orthopedic services. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):179-184.].

Social deprivation index affects time to MRI after knee injury in pediatric patients and is predicted by patient demographics

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to characterize the association between the timing of MRI ordering and completion for pediatric knee injuries and Social Deprivation Index (SDI), which is a comprehensive, validated, county-level, measure of socioeconomic variation in health outcomes based upon combining geography, income, education, employment, housing, household characteristics, and access to transportation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was completed of patients 21 years old and younger from our institution with a history of knee sports injury (ligamentous/soft tissue injury, structural abnormality, instability, inflammation) evaluated with MRI between 5/26/2017 and 12/28/2020. Patients were from three states and attended to by physicians associated with an urban academic institution. Patients were assigned SDI scores based on their ZIP code. Excluded from the study were patients with a non-knee related diagnosis (hip, foot, or ankle), patients from ZIP codes with unknown SDI, and non-sports medicine diagnoses (tumor, infection, fracture).

RESULTS

In a multivariate regression analysis of 355 patients, increased SDI was independently associated with increased time from clinic visit to MRI order (p = 0.044) and from clinic visit to MRI completion (p = 0.047). Each 10-point increase in SDI (0-100) was associated with a delay of 7.2 days on average. SDI itself was found to be associated with a patient's race (p < 0.001), ethnicity (p < 0.001), and insurance category (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Increased SDI is independently associated with longer time from clinic visit to knee MRI order and longer time from clinic visit to knee MRI completion in our pediatric population. Recognizing potential barriers to orthopedic care can help create the change necessary to provide the best possible care for all individual patients.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Otolaryngology Office Visit and Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children with Otitis Media

OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities are pervasive in access to pediatric surgery. The goal of this study was to test the hypotheses that, compared with White children, non-White and Hispanic children: (1) were less likely to attend evaluations by otolaryngologists after a diagnosis of otitis media (OM) eligible for surgical referral, and (2) these children were less likely to receive tympanostomy tube (TT) after surgical consultation.

METHODS

The OptumLabs Data Warehouse is a de-identified claims database of privately insured enrollees. Guidelines on the management of OMs suggest that children should be evaluated for surgery if they have recurrent acute OM or chronic OM with effusion. A cohort of children who were diagnosed with OM were constructed. For Hypothesis 1, the primary outcome was otolaryngology office visit within 6 months of a diagnosis of recurrent or chronic OM. For Hypothesis 2, the outcome was TT placement within 6 months following the otolaryngology office visit. Cox regression models were used to determine the relationship between race/ethnicity and the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 187,776 children with OMs, 72,774 (38.8%) had otolaryngology visits. In a multivariate Cox model, the hazard ratios of attending otolaryngology visit for Black, Hispanic, and Asian children were 0.93 (95% CI,0.90, 0.96), 0.86 (0.83, 0.88), and 0.74 (0.71, 0.77), compared with White children. Among the children evaluated by otolaryngologists, 46,554 (63.97%) received TT. Black, Hispanic, and Asian children with recurrent acute OM had lower likelihood of receiving TT.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities in attending otolaryngology office visit contributed to the disparities in receiving TT.

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Equity in the Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) Diagnosis and Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study to Unravel the Effect of Area Deprivation and the Insurance Type

Background Timely diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is crucial for implementing less invasive treatment. However, socioeconomic barriers may lead to late diagnoses. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is an indicator of the socioeconomic challenges experienced by patients and their families. The primary objective is to investigate if the age at which DDH is diagnosed and the treatment protocol are influenced by the ADI or the insurance type. Materials and methods Using International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Edition (ICD-10) codes, newly diagnosed DDH patients (age under 10 years) from 2020 to 2023 were retrospectively identified at our pediatric tertiary center. Patients were categorized into four groups based on ADI percentile: (1) 1-10th percentile, (2) 11-20th percentile, (3) 21-40th percentile, and (4) 41-100th percentile. They were also stratified by insurance type. Age at diagnosis and treatment protocol (non-operative vs. operative) were collected and compared between the different ADI groups and insurance groups. Operative treatment was defined as open reduction with or without femoral/pelvic osteotomy. Results A total of 327 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and had available ADI scores for analysis. The average age at diagnosis was notably lower in ADI group 1 compared to all other ADI groups (p < 0.05) and considerably lower for patients with commercial insurance compared to those with public (p = 0.0002). The rate of surgical treatment was markedly lower in ADI group 1 compared to ADI groups 2 and 3 (both p < 0.05) and notably lower for those with commercial insurance compared to public (p = 0.0005). ADI groups 2-4 showed no significant differences in average age at diagnosis or surgical treatment rate. Conclusion The study demonstrates that socioeconomic factors affect the diagnosis and, consequently, the treatment course of DDH. Specifically, patients residing in areas with lower levels of deprivation tend to be diagnosed at a younger age and undergo surgical treatment less frequently.

Medicaid and Indigent Patients Experience Delayed Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures, Resulting in Worse Consequential Radiographic Outcomes

Distal radius fractures are the most common upper extremity injury. Patients referred to safety-net tertiary facilities following a fracture experience significant delays in treatment because of financial and language barriers as well as poor access to care at outlying community hospitals. This delay in treatment can affect postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates because of failure to restore anatomic alignment. The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess for risk factors associated with delayed fixation of distal radius fractures and evaluate the impact of delayed treatment on radiographic alignment. Patients with a distal radius fracture treated surgically during a 2-year period were identified. Measures included time from injury to surgery, demographic information, fracture classification, and radiographic parameters. The effect of surgery delay on radiographic outcomes was assessed with delayed surgery defined as 11 or more days out from injury. A total of 183 patients met study inclusion criteria. Medicaid and indigent patients were more likely to experience a delay in surgical treatment. Specifically, 70% of these patients were treated in a delayed fashion. Delayed treatment of 11 days or more was associated with worse radial height and inclination on postoperative radiographic imaging. Medicaid and indigent patients are more likely to experience delayed fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures. This delayed surgery negatively affects postoperative radiographic outcomes. These findings suggest a need to improve access to care for Medicaid and indigent patients and to proceed with operative intervention within 10 days for distal radius fractures. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):e93-e97.].

Socioeconomic, Racial, and Insurance Disparities in Clinical Outcomes After Surgery Among Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status (SES), race, and insurance type correlate with initial curve severity for patients with idiopathic scoliosis, but less is known regarding how these variables impact surgical outcomes. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of SES, race, and insurance on preoperative appointment attendance, likelihood of obtaining a preoperative second opinion, brace prescription, missed 6 or 12-month postsurgical appointments, incidence of emergency department visits 0 to 90 days after surgery, and major complications within a year of surgery.

METHODS

A review of 421 patients diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent surgery at a single high-volume pediatric spinal deformity institution between May 2015 and October 2021 was conducted. Area Deprivation Index, a quantitative measure of SES, was collected. Scores were stratified by quartile; higher scores indicated a lower SES. χ 2 tests for correlation were performed to determine whether clinical outcomes were dependent upon Area Deprivation Index, race, or insurance type; P ≤0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

The sample was 313 Caucasian (74%), 69 (16%) black, and 39 (9.3%) other patients. More patients had private versus public insurance (80% vs 20%) and were of higher SES. The likelihood of missing preoperative appointments was higher for black patients ( P = 0.037). Those with lower SES missed more postoperative appointments and received less bracing and second opinions ( P = 0.038, P = 0.017, P = 0.008, respectively). Being black and publicly insured correlated with fewer brace prescriptions ( P < 0.001, P = 0.050) and decreased rates of obtaining second opinions ( P = 0.004,  P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with idiopathic scoliosis surgery who were Caucasian, privately insured, and of higher SES were more likely to seek preoperative second opinions, be prescribed a brace, and attend postoperative appointments. Recognition of the inherent health care disparities prevalent within each pediatric spine surgery referral region is imperative to better inform local and national institutional level programs to educate and assist patients and families most at risk for disparate access to scoliosis care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective case-control study.

Public Insurance and Single-Guardian Households Are Associated with Diagnostic Delay in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Extensive literature documents the adverse sequelae of delayed diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), including worsening deformity and surgical complications. Less is known about predictors of delayed diagnosis of SCFE, particularly the effects of social determinants of health. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of insurance type, family structure, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic vulnerability on the delay of SCFE diagnosis.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients who underwent surgical fixation for stable SCFE at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2002 to 2021. We abstracted data on demographic characteristics, insurance status, family structure, home address, and symptom duration. We measured diagnostic delay in weeks from the date of symptom onset to diagnosis. We then geocoded patient addresses to determine their Census tract-level U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), using U.S. Census and American Community Survey data. We performed 3 separate logistic regression models to examine the effects of (1) insurance status, (2) family structure, and (3) SVI on a delay of ≥12 weeks (reference, <12 weeks). We adjusted for age, sex, weight status, number of siblings, and calendar year.

RESULTS

We identified 351 patients with SCFE; 37% (129) had a diagnostic delay of ≥12 weeks. In multivariable logistic regression models, patients with public insurance were more likely to have a delay of ≥12 weeks than patients with private insurance (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12 to 2.97]; p = 0.015) and patients from single-guardian households were more likely to have a delay of ≥12 weeks than patients from multiguardian households (adjusted OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.11 to 3.45]; p = 0.021). We did not observe a significant increase in the odds of delay among patients in the highest quartile of overall SVI compared with patients from the lower 3 quartiles, in both the U.S. comparison (adjusted OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.79 to 2.58]; p = 0.24) and the Massachusetts comparison (adjusted OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.79 to 2.66]; p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The delay in diagnosis of SCFE remains a concern, with 37% of patients with SCFE presenting with delay of ≥12 weeks. Public insurance and single-guardian households emerged as independent risk factors for diagnostic delay. Interventions to reduce delay may consider focusing on publicly insured patients and those from single-guardian households.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Epidemiologic patterns of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis detection and treatment in new york state

The purpose of this study is to examine the epidemiologic trends of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) detection and treatment in New York State (NYS), including disparities in access. The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent treatment for, or were diagnosed with, AIS from 2008 to 2016. Age determined adolescence; and the surgery date, 3-digit zip code, sex, race, insurance status, institution and surgeon license number were recorded to identify such trends. The geographical distribution was assembled from an NYS shapefile, obtained from the Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing database with analysis performed using tigris R. In total 54 002 patients with AIS, 3967 of whom were surgically treated, were identified for analysis. Diagnoses spiked in 2010. Females were diagnosed and underwent surgical treatment more frequently than males. AIS was diagnosed and treated in white patients more frequently than in black and Asian patients combined. From 2010 to 2013, the patients self-paying for surgical treatment decreased more than other payment modalities. Medium-volume surgeons continually increased the number of cases performed, whereas low-volume surgeons exhibited the opposite pattern. High-volume hospitals had a decrease in the number of cases from 2012 and were overtaken by medium-volume hospitals in 2015. Most procedures are performed within the New York City (NYC) area, though AIS was common in all NYS counties. AIS diagnoses increased after 2010, with fewer patients self-paying for surgery. White patients underwent more procedures than minority patients. Surgical cases were disproportionally performed in the NYC area compared to statewide.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis, Food Deserts, Poverty, and Urban/Rural Residence: Is There a Link?

BACKGROUND

Childhood obesity is increased in food deserts, a community with little to no access to healthy food. As obesity is associated with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), it was the purpose of this study to analyze the prevalence of SCFE patients by food desert location and its interaction with rural/urban location.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all consecutive patients with idiopathic SCFE treated at our institution over 11 years was performed. From the patient's address, the US Census Bureau tract in which the patient resided was determined. Using the census tract code, it was ascertained if the patient lived in a food desert and urban or rural location. Standard statistical analyses were performed; a P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 177 SCFE patients: 79 girls, 98 boys, 106, White, and 69 nonWhite. The average age at diagnosis was 12.1±1.7 years, the average symptom duration 4.1±5.1 months, and the average weight percentile 94±10. Of these 177 patients, 26.5% lived in a food desert, which was higher than the expected 17.5% ( P =0.023). Those living in a food desert were more commonly nonWhite (60% vs. 32%, P =0.0014). There were 25% from rural areas and 75% from urban areas. No rural SCFE patients lived in food deserts whereas 34% of urban patients lived in food deserts. The average poverty rate of the SCFE patient census tracts was 19%, no greater than the expected 15% ( P =0.32). SCFE patients living in rural census tracts had a lower poverty rate ( P <10 -6 ).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a correlation with the prevalence of SCFE patients by residence in a "food desert", but not with rural/urban locale or poverty status in Indiana. Further research will be needed to see if these findings apply to other states within the United States and other parts of the world.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A 10-Year National Analysis of Pediatric Elbow Fractures

Elbow fractures comprise 15% of all fractures in children. Our study identifies risk factors and consumer products that contribute to pediatric elbow fractures. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was used to collect demographic and consumer product information between 2010 and 2019 for patients younger than 17 years who presented to the emergency department with elbow fractures. Of the 458,433 elbow fractures, the average age of the patients was 7.4 ± 4.1 years and 55.6% were male children. The most common consumer product was sports and recreation equipment, followed by home furnishings. Male patients (P < .0001) and patients 8 years and older (79.2% vs 51.1%, P < .0001) experienced significantly greater rates of injury with sports and recreation equipment. This study evaluates the products associated with pediatric elbow fractures and highlights the importance of safe sports and recreation equipment use and the role of parental counseling in preventing falls from furniture.

Secret shopper studies: an unorthodox design that measures inequities in healthcare access

Secret shopper studies are particularly potent study designs that allow for the gathering of objective data for a variety of research hypotheses, including but not limited to, healthcare delivery, equity of healthcare, and potential barriers to care. Of particular interest during the COVID-19 pandemic, secret shopper study designs allow for the gathering of data over the phone. However, there is a dearth of literature available on appropriate methodological practices for these types of studies. To make these study designs more widely accessible, here we outline the case for using the secret shopper methodology and detail best practices for designing and implementing them.

Assessment of Ethno-racial and Insurance-based Disparities in Pediatric Forearm and Tibial Fracture Care in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Despite growing attention to healthcare disparities and interventions to improve inequalities, additional identification of disparities is needed, particularly in the pediatric population. We used state and nationwide databases to identify factors associated with the surgical treatment of pediatric forearm and tibial fractures.

METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient, Emergency Department, and Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases from four US states and the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database were quarried using International Classification of Diseases codes to identify patients from 2006 to 2015. Multivariable regression models were used to determine factors associated with surgical treatment.

RESULTS

State databases identified 130,006 forearm (1575 open) and 51,979 tibial fractures (1339 open). Surgical treatment was done in 2.6% of closed and 37.5% of open forearm fractures and 7.9% of closed and 60.5% of open tibial fractures. A national estimated total of 3,312,807 closed and 46,569 open forearm fractures were included, 59,024 (1.8%) of which were treated surgically. A total of 719,374 closed and 26,144 open tibial fractures were identified; 52,506 (7.0%) were treated surgically. Multivariable regression revealed that race and/or insurance status were independent predictors for the lower likelihood of surgery in 3 of 4 groups: Black patients were 43% and 35% less likely to have surgery after closed and open forearm fractures, respectively, and patients with Medicaid were less often treated surgically for open tibial fractures in state (17%) and nationwide (20%) databases.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in pediatric forearm and tibial fracture care persist, especially for Black patients and those with Medicaid; identification of influencing factors and interventions to address them are important in improving equality and value of care.

Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) is a skeletal pathology affecting adolescents which requires timely surgery to prevent progression. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of SCFE can negatively affect patient prognosis, and few studies have examined how health disparities and barriers to care may influence these delays. In particular, only a handful of studies have included a Hispanic patient sample, despite this ethnic group’s increased risk for the disease and unique barriers to care. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 124 patients surgically treated for idiopathic SCFE from January 2010 to September 2017. Patient data included age, facility and date of diagnosis, sex, BMI, race and ethnicity, Southwick slip angle, and insurance type. Results indicated that patients with private insurance were more likely to present with a mild slip than patients who were insured by Medicaid or uninsured, while patients without insurance were more likely to have severe slips. Patients without insurance also had a significantly higher mean slip than patients with insurance. The relationship between insurance status and slip angle degree was significant independent of race, even though Hispanic individuals were significantly more likely to have Medicaid or be uninsured. All patients without insurance, and a majority of those with Medicaid, were diagnosed in the emergency department. Time to diagnosis and slip angle were positively correlated, which suggests that longer delays led to increase of the slip angle, consistent with previous findings. Time to diagnosis and BMI were also correlated, which may be tied to socioeconomic factors, but the possibility of weight bias should not be dismissed. These results suggest that socioeconomic status and other factors may have contributed to barriers to care which led to delays in diagnosis and thus more severe slips. Future SCFE research should include health disparities variables to better inform treatment and prognosis.

Do Patient Demographics and Socioeconomic Status Influence Severity and Time to Diagnosis in Children With Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

BACKGROUND

The time to diagnosis in stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is often several months because of nebulous history, symptoms of knee/thigh pain, and Medicaid insurance. This study examined the impact of socioeconomic status and demographics on the time to diagnosis and SCFE severity in Indiana children.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients at a tertiary children's hospital with SCFE from January 2010 through March 2021 was performed. Standard demographic data and type of insurance was collected. Neighborhood Atlas Mapping was used to determine the state decile of the area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of socioeconomic status using 17 variables related to income, employment, education, and housing. Statistical analyses consisted of standard univariate and bivariate analyses; logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of a mild SCFE. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 142 patients; 81 male and 61 female. The average age was 12.2±1.7 years, lateral epiphyseal shaft angle of 35±19 degrees, and symptom duration of 4.5±5.0 months. There was no correlation between ADI state deciles and lateral epiphyseal shaft angle (r2=0.008) or symptom duration (r2=0.019). Insurance status and race differed by ADI deciles. In the first decile (least disadvantaged), 44% had government insurance and 89% were White; in the 10th decile (most disadvantaged), 95% had government insurance and 38% were White. Predictors of a mild SCFE were female sex [odds ratio (OR): 3.2 [1.5, 7.0]; P=0.004], symptom duration <3 months [OR: 5.3 (2.4, 11.7); P=0.00004], and White race [OR: 2.4 (1.3, 6.2); P=0.01]. Insurance status and ADI were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to other studies, neither insurance or socioeconomic status were associated with a delay in diagnosis or SCFE severity. The symptom duration in children with SCFE does not appear to be decreasing over the last several decades. Further investigation is required as to why.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

What Are the Causes and Consequences of Delayed Surgery for Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study

Background:

The uncommon nature of tibial spine fractures (TSFs) may result in delayed diagnosis and treatment. The outcomes of delayed surgery are unknown.

Purpose:

To evaluate risk factors for, and outcomes of, delayed surgical treatment of pediatric TSFs.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of TSFs treated surgically at 10 institutions between 2000 and 2019. Patient characteristics and preoperative data were collected, as were intraoperative information and postoperative complications. Surgery ≥21 days after injury was considered delayed based on visualized trends in the data. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounders.

Results:

A total of 368 patients (mean age, 11.7 ± 2.9 years) were included, 21.2% of whom underwent surgery ≥21 days after injury. Patients who experienced delayed surgery had 3.8 times higher odds of being diagnosed with a TSF at ≥1 weeks after injury (95% CI, 1.1-14.3; P = .04), 2.1 times higher odds of having seen multiple clinicians before the treating surgeon (95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .03), 5.8 times higher odds of having magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ≥1 weeks after injury (95% CI, 1.6-20.8; P < .007), and were 2.2 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.3-3.9; P = .005). Meniscal injuries were encountered intraoperatively in 42.3% of patients with delayed surgery versus 21.0% of patients treated without delay (P < .001), resulting in 2.8 times higher odds in multivariate analysis (95% CI, 1.6-5.0; P < .001). Delayed surgery was also a risk factor for procedure duration >2.5 hours (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9; P = .006). Patients who experienced delayed surgery and also had an operation >2.5 hours had 3.7 times higher odds of developing arthrofibrosis (95% CI, 1.1-12.5; P = .03).

Conclusion:

Patients who underwent delayed surgery for TSFs were found to have a higher rate of concomitant meniscal injury, longer procedure duration, and more postoperative arthrofibrosis when the surgery length was >2.5 hours. Those who experienced delays in diagnosis or MRI, saw multiple clinicians, and had public insurance were more likely to have a delay to surgery.

Socioeconomic Status Impacts Access to Orthopaedic Specialty Care

»

Financial, personal, and structural barriers affect access to all aspects of orthopaedic specialty care.

»

Disparities in access to care are present across all subspecialties of orthopaedic surgery in the United States.

»

Improving timely access to care in orthopaedic surgery is crucial for both health equity and optimizing patient outcomes.

»

Options for improving orthopaedic access include increasing Medicaid/Medicare payments to physicians, providing secondary resources to assist patients with limited finances, and reducing language barriers in both clinical care and patient education.

Low socioeconomic status worsens access to care and outcomes for rotator cuff repair: a scoping review

Background

Poor socioeconomic status (SES) is consistently associated with poor quality of health care, particularly in the field of orthopedics. Expanding insurance coverage has created a larger patient population by specifically making health care more accessible, translating to greater demand for care in the low-SES population. The purpose of this article is to provide a scoping review of literature observing access and outcomes of rotator cuff repair surgery among low-SES populations.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of articles using PubMed, Embase, and EBSCO (May 2021) from 2010 onward. Peer-reviewed articles that recorded at least one SES measure specific to patients who underwent rotator cuff repair from the United States were included. SES measures were methodically defined as income, occupation, employment, education, and race. All data that aligned with these SES measures were extracted.

Results

Of the 1009 titles reviewed, 109 studies were screened by abstract, 23 were reviewed in full, and 7 studies met criteria for inclusion. Of the 5 studies investigating access, all 5 found disparities among postoperative physical therapy, orthopedic consult, and surgery, using Medicaid status as a proxy for income in addition to other income measures. Of the 3 studies analyzing outcomes, 2 found that low-SES patients had worse pain and function, again based on Medicaid status and other income measures. Education did not have a significant impact on outcomes, as per the 1 study that included it. No studies included measures of occupation or employment.

Conclusion

Patients of low SES face reduced access to cuff repair care and worse associated outcomes, despite federal and state government efforts to reduce health care disparity through health care reform. The small nature of this review reflects how measures of SES are often not examined in rotator cuff repair studies.

Social Determinants of Health Influence Access to Care and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact social determinants of health (SDOH) have on accessing orthopaedic treatment after an anterior cruciate ligament injury, as well as patient-reported and surgical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, Embase, and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies that reported at least 1 SDOH and its effect on patient-reported outcomes or surgical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Our search identified 937 studies. After eliminating 273 duplicates, 2 authors screened 664 articles on the basis of title and abstract. After this initial screening, 76 studies were evaluated for data extraction. Studies were categorized based on the social determinant(s) of health reported.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles published between 2002 and 2020 were included in this study, encompassing 15 retrospective cohort studies, 3 prospective cohort studies, 3 cross-sectional studies, and 1 case-control study from 9 journals across 3 countries. Of these articles, 9 investigated race/ethnicity, 8 investigated insurance status, 4 investigated income, 5 investigated education level, 2 investigated employment status, and 5 investigated socioeconomic status. Reported outcomes included time to treatment, concomitant knee injury, patient-reported outcome measurement scores, postoperative complications, need for additional surgery, and postoperative healthcare utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain SDOH, including black race, Hispanic ethnicity, public health insurance, and lower socioeconomic status contribute to a delay in access to care, which may result in increased severity of concomitant knee injuries encountered at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and inferior outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III, systematic review of level I-III evidence.

The Financial Burden of Nonoperatively Treated Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures: Medical Debt in Privately Versus Publicly Insured Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with public health insurance have greater difficulty obtaining orthopaedic care than their privately insured counterparts because of lower reimbursements. However, the relationship between insurance status and financial burden for patients and treating institutions is unknown. We compared patient medical debt and uncompensated hospital costs by insurance type for pediatric patients who received nonoperative treatment for distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 100 pediatric patients (above 18 y) treated nonoperatively at our US academic hospital for DRFs from 2016 to 2020. Patients were grouped according to insurance type at the time of treatment: preferred-provider organization (PPO), n=30; health maintenance organization (HMO), n=29; Medicaid, n=28; and uninsured, n=13. These groups were matched by number of encounters, total original charge, and total number of charges. The primary outcomes were patient medical debt and uncompensated costs to the hospital, comprising unpaid balance, uncollectible debt, and self-adjustments offered by the hospital. χ2 tests and analysis of variance were used to compare financial outcomes among subgroups (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Patient medical debt (ie, uncollectible debt) was generated by 20% of PPO, 7.7% of uninsured, and 6.9% of HMO patients (P=0.06). Medicaid patients generated no patient medical debt, whereas PPO patients generated a mean (±SD) of $15±$39 and HMO patients generated $26±$130, which was not significantly different than that of uninsured patients ($25±$89) (P<0.0001). Uncompensated costs were generated by 54% of uninsured, 20% of PPO, 6.9% of HMO, and 0% of Medicaid patients (P<0.0001). Uncompensated costs were the same as uncollectible debt for privately insured and Medicaid patients, whereas uninsured patients generated an additional $550±$600 from self-adjustments (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Unlike the Medicaid group, the privately insured and uninsured groups incurred patient medical debt and uncompensated costs after nonoperative DRF treatment. Thus, orthopaedic providers should be cost conscious with privately insured patients, while publicly insured patients may provide more consistent-albeit lower-reimbursement for the hospital.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does Insurance Status Affect Treatment of Children With Tibial Spine Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported disparities in orthopaedic care resulting from demographic factors, including insurance status. However, the effect of insurance on pediatric tibial spine fractures (TSFs), an uncommon but significant injury, is unknown.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of insurance status on the evaluation and treatment of TSFs in children and adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of TSFs treated at 10 institutions between 2000 and 2019. Demographic data were collected, as was information regarding pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment, with attention to delays in management and differences in care. Surgical and nonsurgical fractures were included, but a separate analysis of surgical patients was performed. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 434 patients (mean ± SD age, 11.7 ± 3.0 years) of which 61.1% had private (commercial) insurance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at similar rates for children with public and private insurance (41.4% vs 41.9%, respectively; P≥ .999). However, multivariate analysis revealed that those with MRI performed ≥21 days after injury were 5.3 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.3-21.7; P = .02). Of the 434 patients included, 365 required surgery. Similar to the overall cohort, those in the surgical subgroup with MRI ≥21 days from injury were 4.8 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.2-19.6; P = .03). Children who underwent surgery ≥21 days after injury were 2.5 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.1-6.1; P = .04). However, there were no differences in the nature of the surgery or findings at surgery. Those who were publicly insured were 4.1 times more likely to be immobilized in a cast rather than a brace postoperatively (95% CI, 2.3-7.4; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Children with public insurance and a TSF were more likely to experience delays with MRI and surgical treatment than those with private insurance. However, there were no differences in the nature of the surgery or findings at surgery. Additionally, patients with public insurance were more likely to undergo postoperative casting rather than bracing.

Epidemiology of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation at Children's Hospitals in the United States

Background:

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) was developed with the goal of delaying the progression of degenerative disease in the setting of substantial meniscal deficiency. This may be especially important in children and adolescents; however, there is a paucity of literature on MAT in this population.

Purpose:

To evaluate the epidemiology of MAT at pediatric hospitals in the United States, with specific attention to regional and characteristic trends.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The Pediatric Health Information System, a national database consisting of 49 children’s hospitals, was queried for all patients younger than 25 years who underwent MAT between 2011 and 2018. Characteristic information and surgical history were collected for each patient. The database was also queried for all patients who underwent other meniscal surgeries (including debridement, meniscectomy, and meniscal repair) during the same period (controls). Characteristic and geographic data from the control group were compared with those of the patients who underwent MAT. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounding factors.

Results:

A total of 27,168 meniscal surgeries were performed in 47 hospitals, with MAT performed 67 times in 17 hospitals. Twelve (18%) patients underwent a subsequent procedure after transplantation. In multivariate analysis, each year of increasing age resulted in 1.1 times higher odds of having undergone MAT (95% CI, 1.03-1.1; P = .002) compared with repair or meniscectomy. Patients who underwent MAT also had 2.0 times higher odds of being women (95% CI, 1.2-3.3; P = .01) and 2.0 times higher odds of being privately insured (95% CI, 1.1-3.6; P = .02). MAT was performed most frequently in the Northeast (4.9/1000 meniscal surgeries) and least often in the South (1.1/1000 meniscal surgeries) (P < .001).

Conclusion:

In the United States, pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent MAT were older and more likely to be female and have private insurance than those undergoing meniscal repair or meniscectomy. MAT was only performed in 17 of 47 children’s hospitals that perform meniscal surgery. These trends highlight the need for further research, especially regarding differences along the lines of sex and insurance status.

Financial Distress Is Associated With Delay in Seeking Care for Hand Conditions

Background: As medical costs continue to rise, financial distress due to these costs has led to poorer health outcomes and patient cost-coping behavior. Here, we test the null hypothesis that financial distress is not associated with delay of seeking care for hand conditions. Methods: Eighty-seven new patients presenting to the hand clinic for nontraumatic conditions completed our study. Patients completed validated instruments for measuring financial distress, pain catastrophizing, and pain. Questions regarding delay of care were included. The primary outcome was self-reported delay of the current hand clinic visit. Results: Patients who experience high financial distress differed significantly from those who experience low financial distress with respect to age, race, annual household income, and employment status. Those experiencing high financial distress were more likely to report having delayed their visit to the hand clinic (57% vs 30%), higher pain catastrophizing scores (17.7 vs 7.6), and higher average pain in the preceding week (4.5 vs 2.3). After adjusting for age, sex, and pain, high financial distress (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 4.90) and pain catastrophizing score (adjusted OR = 0.96) were found to be independent predictors of delay. Financial distress was highly associated with annual household income in a multivariable linear regression model. Conclusions: Patients with nontraumatic hand conditions who experience higher financial distress are more likely to delay their visit to the hand clinic. Within health care systems, identification of patients with high financial distress and targeted interventions (eg, social or financial services) may help prevent unnecessary delays in care.

Developmental hip dysplasia and hip ultrasound frequency in a large American payer database

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an important contributor to musculoskeletal morbidity, but effective strategies to screen for DDH remain controversial. The current utilization of hip ultrasound (US) screening for DDH in the United States is not defined. This study utilized Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart, a large commercial and Medicare Advantage claims database. The frequency of DDH and hip US utilization was estimated using billing data on an average of 2.9 million relevant beneficiaries included annually from 2007 through 2017. A total of 6806 DDH cases were identified with an average annual prevalence of 1.7 per 1000 infants, which was stable during the study period. Girls were more likely to be screened and diagnosed with DDH, comprising 72% of DDH cases with an OR of 2.55 (95% CI 2.42-2.69), p < 0.001. Hip US screening was employed in 0.9% of the infant population on average but increased substantially from 2007 (0.4%) to 2017 (2.2%). Most common billing diagnoses included hip deformity (27.4%), breech delivery (20.4%), and physical exam abnormality (17.7%). The average imaging costs per patient for all screened children was $108.94. Insurance claims reflect the current American practice of selective hip US with relative adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines based on reported diagnoses. While hip US utilization increased during the study period, prevalence of DDH diagnoses did not increase. Our results suggest that expansion of hip US screening may not effectively increase DDH detection although further investigation is needed to ascertain optimal screening strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Epidemiology of Surgical Procedures, Anesthesia, and Imaging Studies by Gestational Age during the First Year of Life in Medicaid-Insured Infants

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of surgical procedures, anesthetic use, and imaging studies by prematurity status for the first year of life we analyzed data for Texas Medicaid-insured newborns.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a retrospective population-based live birth cohort of newborn infants insured by Texas Medicaid in 2010-2014 with 4 subcohorts: extremely premature, very premature, moderate/late premature, and term.

RESULTS

In 1 102 958 infants, surgical procedures per 100 infants were 135.9 for extremely premature, 35.4 for very premature, 15.5 for moderate/late premature, and 6.5 for term. Anesthetic use was 62.0 for extremely premature, 20.8 for very premature, 11.1 for moderate/late premature, and 5.6 for the term subcohort. The most common procedures in the extremely premature were neurosurgery, intubations, and procedures that facilitated caloric intake (gastrostomy tubes and fundoplications). The annual rates for the first year of life for chest radiograph ranged from 15.0 per year for the extremely premature cohort to 0.6 for term infants and for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 0.3 to 0.01. MRI was the most common imaging study with anesthesia support in all maturity levels. MRIs were done in extremely premature without anesthesia in over 90% and in term infants in 57.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical procedures, anesthetic use, and imaging studies in infants are common and more frequent with higher a degree of prematurity while the use of anesthesia is lower in more premature newborns. These findings can provide direction for outcome studies of surgery and anesthesia exposure.

Variability in the Duration of Designated Pediatric Orthopaedic Rotations Among US Residency Programs

Our goal was to assess the variability in the assigned duration of pediatric orthopaedic rotation among US allopathic orthopaedic residency programs to see how pediatrics is incorporated into surgical education.

Improvement in Outpatient Follow-up With a Postdischarge Phone Call Intervention

INTRODUCTION

Attending clinic appointments after injury is crucial for orthopaedic trauma patients to evaluate healing and to update recommendations. However, attendance at these appointments is inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a personalized phone call placed 3 to 5 days after hospital discharge on attendance at the first postdischarge outpatient clinic visit.

METHODS

This prospective study was done at an urban level 1 trauma center. One hundred fifty-nine patients were exposed to a reminder phone call, with 33% of patients being reached for a conversation and 28% receiving a voicemail reminder. Phone calls were made by a trained trauma recovery coach, and the main outcome measure was attendance at the first postdischarge clinic visit.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (54%) attended their scheduled appointments. Appointment adherence was more common among the group reached for a conversation (70% versus 51% for voicemail cohort and 34% for no contact group). Patients exposed to the Trauma Recovery Services (TRS) during their hospital stay attended appointments more often (91% versus 61%, P = 0.026). Age, sex, mechanism of injury, and distance from the hospital were not associated with specific follow-up appointment adherence. Insured status was associated with higher attendance rates (71% versus 46%, P = 0.0036). Other economic factors such as employment were also indicative of attendance (64% versus 48%, P = 0.05). Current tobacco use was associated with poor appointment attendance (30%) versus 56% for nonsmokers (P = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Patients reached by telephone after discharge had better rates of subsequent clinic attendance. Economic factors and substance use appear vital to postoperative clinic visit compliance. Patients with met psychosocial needs, as identified by individuals with satisfactory emotional support, and exposure to TRS had the highest rates of postdischarge appointment attendance.

Is the incidence of paediatric stress fractures on the rise? Trends in New York State from 2000 to 2015

The purpose of this study is to analyze trends in the epidemiology of paediatric stress fractures. The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for stress fractures in children between the ages of 6 and 18 years. After checking for monotonicity of the data, Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated. Multivariate regressions were used to test for associations between demographic variables and risk of stress fracture. Analysis of 11 475 386 outpatient visits between 2000 and 2015 showed that the annual incidence of paediatric stress fractures increased from 1.37 cases per 100 000 outpatient visits in 2006 to 5.32 per 100 000 visits in 2015 (ρ = 0.876, P < 0.01). The mean age at the time of injury was 14.4 ± 2.8 years. Children younger than 14 years accounted for 33.6% of the cohort. Age, male sex, white ethnicity, and private insurance were statistically significant predictors of stress fractures in a multivariate model. This study is the first to document an increase in the annual incidence of paediatric stress fractures.

Inequalities in Pediatric Fracture Care Timeline Based on Insurance Type

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic and insurance status are often linked with limited access to health care. Despite several government-funded projects aimed at curtailing these barriers, pediatric orthopaedic patients continue to experience delays in receiving timely care for fracture treatments. This delay has been well-identified within the orthopaedic literature but, to our knowledge, has never been characterized based on timeline. Thus, the goal of this study is to evaluate the role of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance type on the timeline of pediatric patients to obtain orthopaedic care within our community.

METHODS

Pediatric patients presenting to our clinic for the treatment of one of 21 most common fractures were included. Patient demographics and the timeline of patient care were collected by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Government-funded insurance accounted for 60.6% of the 413 patients. These patients experienced significant (P < 0.001) delays in access to care when compared with commercial insurance patients; the time between injury and referral as well as the overall time from injury to orthopaedic evaluation was 2.8 and twofold greater at 4.4 days and 9.2 days, respectively. A strong correlation was established between income levels and insurance type.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric patients with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely to rely on government-funded insurance and experience delays in fracture evaluation.

Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Burn Survivors Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery in the Rehabilitative Period

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life is decreased in burn survivors, with scars implicated as a cause. The authors aim to characterize the use of reconstructive surgery following hospitalization and determine whether patient-reported outcomes change over time. The authors hypothesized improvement in health-related quality of life following reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

Adult burn survivors undergoing reconstructive surgery within 24 months after injury were extracted from a prospective, longitudinal database from 5 U.S. burn centers (Burn Model System). Surgery was classified by problem as follows: scar, contracture, and open wound. The authors evaluated predictors of surgery using logistic regression. Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 health survey outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months were compared at follow-up intervals and matched with nonoperated participants using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-two of 1359 participants (27.4 percent) underwent one or more reconstructive operation within 24 months of injury. Factors that increased the likelihood of surgery included number of operations during index hospitalization (p < 0.001), hand (p = 0.001) and perineal involvement (p = 0.042), and range-of-motion limitation at discharge (p < 0.001). Compared to the physical component scores of peers who were not operated on, physical component scores increased for participants undergoing scar operations; however, these gains were only significant for those undergoing surgery more than 6 months after injury (p < 0.05). Matched physical component scores showed nonsignificant differences following contracture operations. Mental component scores were unchanged or lower following scar and contracture surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants requiring more operations during index admission were more likely to undergo reconstructive surgery. There were improvements in Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 scores for those undergoing scar operations more than 6 months after injury, although contracture operations were not associated with significant differences in Short Form-12/Veterans RAND 12 scores.

Disparities in Use of Subspecialty Concussion Care Based on Ethnicity

Concussion is common and subspecialty care can be essential to ensure recovery. However, barriers may exist to accessing care. This study aimed to assess disparities in subspecialty concussion care related to ethnicity, limited English proficiency (LEP), and insurance status. We utilized logistic regression to analyze 2010-2015 administrative data from four Sports Medicine clinics, comparing odds of being seen for concussion to odds of being seen for fracture by ethnicity, insurance type, and interpreter usage, controlling for demographic factors. ICD-9 codes were used to identify concussion and fracture. Our final sample contained 25,294 subjects: 5621 with concussion and 19,673 with fracture. In bivariate analysis, youth seen for concussion had 83% lower odds of being Hispanic compared with youth seen for fracture (95%CI: 75-92%). Due to interactions between ethnicity and interpreter use, we utilized a stratified multivariate model as our final model. Youth with concussion had 1.8× greater odds of having private insurance compared with youth with fracture (Hispanic OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.3; Non-Hispanic OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-2.0). Youth with concussion also had greater odds of not using an interpreter, though the strength of this association was weaker for Hispanic youth compared with non-Hispanic youth (Hispanic OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.30-2.17; Non-Hispanic OR 4.36, 95% CI 3.00-6.35). Age and sex were included as covariates. In conclusion, our analysis suggests disparities in subspecialty concussion care for Hispanic youth, as well as for individuals with LEP and non-private insurance. Further research should explore means for improving access to concussion care for all youth.

Disparities in Access to Musculoskeletal Care: Narrowing the Gap: AOA Critical Issues Symposium

The current health-care system in the United States has numerous barriers to quality, accessible, and affordable musculoskeletal care for multiple subgroups of our population. These hurdles include complex cultural, educational, and socioeconomic factors. Tertiary referral centers provide a disproportionately large amount of the care for the uninsured and underinsured members of our society. These gaps in access to care for certain subgroups lead to inappropriate emergency room usage, lengthy hospitalizations, increased administrative load, lost productivity, and avoidable complications and/or deaths, which all represent a needless burden on our health-care system. Through advocacy, policy changes, workforce diversification, and practice changes, orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to seek solutions to improve access to quality and affordable musculoskeletal care for the communities that they serve.

Epidemiology of syndactyly in New York State

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of literature focusing on the incidence and surgical management of syndactyly. In this study, we describe the incidence and rates of surgical management of patients with syndactyly in New York State.

AIM

To describe the incidence and surgical management of patients with syndactyly using an America's population-based database.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. All patients with a diagnosis of syndactyly at birth were identified and followed longitudinally to determine yearly incidence as well as demographic and surgical factors. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were used.

RESULTS

There were 3306 newborns with a syndactyly diagnosis between 1997 and 2014 in New York State. The overall incidence was 0.074% or 7 cases per 10000 live births. A small number of patients underwent surgical correction in New York State (178 patients, 5.4%). Among the surgical patients, most of the operations were performed before the age of two (79%). Approximately 87% of surgeries were performed at teaching hospitals, and 52% of procedures were performed by plastic surgeons. Skin grafting was performed in 15% of cases. Patients having surgery in New York State were more likely to have Medicaid insurance compared to patients not having surgery (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Syndactyly occurs in approximately 7 per 10000 live births, and the majority of patients undergo surgical correction before age two. There may be several barriers to care including the availability of specialized hand surgeons, access to teaching hospitals, and insurance status.

Does Medicaid expansion improve access to care for the first-time shoulder dislocator?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of individual state Medicaid expansion status on access to care for shoulder instability.

METHODS

Four pairs of Medicaid expanded (Louisiana, Kentucky, Iowa, and Nevada) and unexpanded (Alabama, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Utah) states in similar geographic locations were chosen for the study. Twelve practices from each state were randomly selected from the American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine directory, resulting in a sample size of 96 independent sports medicine offices. Each office was called twice to request an appointment for a fictitious 16-year-old first-time shoulder dislocator with either in-state Medicaid insurance or Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) private insurance.

RESULTS

A total of 91 physician offices in 8 states were contacted by telephone. An appointment was obtained at 36 (39.6%) offices when calling with Medicaid and at 74 (81.3%) offices when calling with BCBS (P < .001). Thirty-five (38.5%) offices were able to make appointments for both types of insurance, 39 (42.9%) for only BCBS, 1 (1.1%) for only Medicaid, and 16 (17.5%) for neither. For Medicaid patients, an appointment was booked in 13 (27.7%) clinics from Medicaid expanded states and in 23 (52.3%) clinics from unexpanded states (P = .016).

CONCLUSION

For a first-time shoulder dislocator, access to care is more difficult with Medicaid insurance compared with private insurance. Within Medicaid insurance, access to care is more difficult in Medicaid expanded states compared with unexpanded states. Medicaid patients in unexpanded states are twice as likely as those in expanded states to obtain an appointment.

Impact of Insurance Status on Time to Evaluation and Treatment of Meniscal Tears in Children, Adolescents, and College-Aged Patients in the United States

Background:

The meniscus is vital for load bearing, knee stabilization, and shock absorption, making a meniscal tear a well-recognized sport-related injury in children and young adults. An inverse relationship between the quality and value of orthopaedic care provided and the overall treatment cycle exists in which delayed meniscal tear treatment increases the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes. Although a majority of children and young adults have health insurance, many athletes within this demographic still face significant barriers in accessing orthopaedic services because of insurance type and household income.

Purpose:

To determine the impact of insurance status and socioeconomic markers on the time to orthopaedic evaluation and treatment as well as the rate of surgical interventions for meniscal tears in children and young adult athletes in the United States.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients ≤22 years of age who presented to our institution between 2008 and 2016 and who were diagnosed with meniscal tears. Patients were categorized based on insurance and socioeconomic status. Dates of injury, referral, evaluation by an orthopaedic surgeon, and surgery were also recorded. Chi-square and regression analyses were utilized to determine the significance and correlation between the influencing factors and time to referral, evaluation, and surgery.

Results:

Publicly insured, commercially insured, and uninsured patients comprised 49.4%, 26.6%, and 24.1%, respectively, of the 237 patients included in this study. Insurance status was predictive of time to orthopaedic referral, initial evaluation, and surgery (P < .01). Uninsured and publicly insured patients experienced significant delays during their orthopaedic care compared with commercially insured patients. However, no correlation was found between insurance status or household income and the rate of surgical interventions.

Conclusion:

Publicly insured and uninsured pediatric and college-aged patients faced significant barriers in accessing orthopaedic services, as demonstrated by substantially longer times between the initial injury and referral to an orthopaedic evaluation and surgery; however, these socioeconomic factors did not affect the rate of surgical management. Clinical competency regarding the effects of socioeconomic factors on the time to orthopaedic care and efforts to expedite care among underinsured and underserved children are vital for improving patient outcomes.

A Dedicated Fracture Reduction Room: A Cost-Effective Alternative to the Operating Room

INTRODUCTION

Charges, procedural efficiency, return to activity, and complications after closed treatment of fractures performed in an operating room (OR) versus closed reduction in a dedicated fracture reduction room (FRR) were compared.

METHODS

Patients with closed fractures of the forearm who underwent closed reduction in the year before (OR), and after implementation of the FRR, were retrospectively reviewed. Charges, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, sex, age, length of follow-up, prior reduction, fracture location/displacement, time from injury to procedure, procedural time, time to return to activity, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria in the FRR group (13 men, 5 women), and 22 in the OR group (18 men, 4 women). No notable differences in age, sex, follow-up, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, fracture location/displacement, incidence of prior reduction, or time to return to activity were observed. Two (9.5%) complications occurred in the FRR group versus 7 (32%) in the OR group, P > 0.05. No anesthesia complications were present. Patients treated in the FRR incurred charges of $5,299 ± $1,289 versus $10,455 ± $2,290 in the OR, P < 0.001. Total time of visit in the FRR was ∼30% less than the OR, P < 0.001. No notable delay in treatment was observed.

DISCUSSION

In the era of finite resources and value-based care, implementation of a FRR resulted in safe, cost-effective, and increased procedural efficiency.

Access to Orthopaedic Care for Spanish-Speaking Patients in California

BACKGROUND

Communication is the foundation of any patient-doctor relationship. Patients who are unable to communicate effectively with physicians because of language barriers may face disparities in accessing orthopaedic care and in the evaluation and treatment of musculoskeletal symptoms. We evaluated whether Spanish-speaking patients face disparities scheduling appointments with orthopaedists via the telephone.

METHODS

From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) web site, we randomly selected 50 orthopaedic surgeons' offices in California specializing in knee surgery. The investigator called eligible offices using a script to request an appointment for a hypothetical Spanish-speaking or English-speaking 65-year-old man with knee pain. The caller randomly selected the patient's primary language for this first call. A second call was placed a week later requesting an appointment for an identical patient who spoke the alternate language.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients' access to appointments with an orthopaedic surgeon (p = 0.8256). Thirty-six English-speaking patients and 35 Spanish-speaking patients were offered an appointment. Twenty-eight Spanish-speaking patients were instructed to bring a friend or family member who could translate for them, 3 were told that the provider spoke sufficient Spanish to communicate without the need for an interpreter, and 4 were told that an interpreter would be made available.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not detect a disparity between Spanish-speaking and English-speaking patients' access to appointments with an orthopaedic surgeon. However, 80% of Spanish-speaking patients were asked to rely on nonqualified interpreters for their orthopaedic appointment. This study suggests that orthopaedic offices in California depend heavily on ad hoc interpreters rather than professional interpretation services. It also highlights potential barriers to the provision of qualified interpreters. Additional study is warranted to assess how this lack of adequate utilization of medical interpreters affects the patient-doctor relationship, the quality of care received, and the financial burden on the health system.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Optimizing the care that we provide to our patients is a goal of every orthopaedic surgeon. We highlight the importance of utilizing professional interpreters as a means to reduce health-care disparities and overall health-care costs, as well as the importance of improving reimbursement and infrastructure for physicians to utilize qualified interpreters in caring for their limited-English-proficient patients.

Pediatric nonoperative skull fractures: delayed complications and factors associated with clinic and imaging utilization

OBJECTIVE

Skull fractures represent a common source of morbidity in the pediatric trauma population. This study characterizes the type of follow-up that these patients receive and discusses predictive factors for follow-up.

METHODS

The authors reviewed cases of nonoperative pediatric skull fractures at a single academic hospital between 2007 and 2017. Clinical patient and radiological fractures were recorded. Recommended neurosurgical follow-up, follow-up appointments, imaging studies, and fracture-related complications were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors for outpatient follow-up and imaging.

RESULTS

The study included 414 patients, whose mean age was 5.2 years; 37.2% were female, and the median length of stay was 1 day (IQR 0.9-4 days). During 438 clinic visits and a median follow-up period of 8 weeks (IQR 4-12, range 1-144 weeks), 231 imaging studies were obtained, mostly head CT scans (55%). A total of 283 patients were given recommendations to attend follow-up in the clinic, and 86% were seen. Only 12 complications were detected, including 7 growing skull fractures, 2 traumatic encephaloceles, and 3 cases of hearing loss. Primary care physician (PCP) status and insurance status were associated with a recommendation of follow-up, actual follow-up compliance, and the decision to order outpatient imaging in patients both with and without intracranial hemorrhage. PCP status remained an independent predictor in each of these analyses. Follow-up compliance was not associated with a patient's distance from home. Among patients without intracranial hemorrhage, a follow-up recommendation and actual follow-up compliance were associated with pneumocephalus and other polytraumatic injuries, and outpatient imaging was associated with a bilateral fracture. No complications were found in patients with linear fractures above the skull base in those without an intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric nonoperative skull fractures drive a large expenditure of clinic and imaging resources to detect a relatively small profile of complications. Understanding the factors underlying the decision for clinic follow-up and additional imaging can decrease future costs, resource utilization, and radiation exposure. Factors related to injury severity and socioeconomic indicators were associated with outpatient imaging, the decision to follow up patients in the clinic, and patients' subsequent attendance. Socioeconomic status (PCP and insurance) may affect access to appropriate neurosurgical follow-up and deserves future research attention. Patients with no intracranial hemorrhage and with a linear fracture above the skull base do not appear to be at risk for delayed complications and could be candidates for reduced follow-up and imaging.

Variation in the Delivery of Inpatient Orthopaedic Care to Medicaid Beneficiaries within a Single Metropolitan Region

BACKGROUND

There is variability in access to and utilization of orthopaedic care, particularly for those with Medicaid insurance. One potential contributor is perceived unwillingness of surgeons and hospitals to accept underinsured patients. We used administrative data to examine the payer mix for select inpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures at all hospitals within a single region, hypothesizing that the delivery of orthopaedic surgery to Medicaid beneficiaries varies highly at the hospital level.

METHODS

Using administrative data, we analyzed inpatient hospitalizations for elective cases (total knee or hip arthroplasty; spinal decompression or fusion) and trauma cases (hip hemiarthroplasty; femoral or tibial and fibular fracture repair) among 22 hospitals in a single region from 2011 to 2016 for patients who were 18 to 64 years of age. The primary outcome was the percentage of each hospital's caseload with Medicaid listed as the primary payer. The secondary outcome measured each hospital's Medicaid percentage against the percentage of Medicaid-insured individuals within 10 miles of the hospital (Medicaid share ratio), using a ratio of 1 as a benchmark. To quantify variation, we calculated a weighted coefficient of variation of the Medicaid share ratio for all cases combined, elective cases only, and trauma cases only.

RESULTS

For all cases (n = 19,204), the mean percentage of Medicaid-funded surgical procedures was 7.6% (range, 0.2% to 57.3%). The mean Medicaid share ratio was 1.0 (range, 0.05 to 4.20). Across 22 hospitals, the weighted coefficient of variation for Medicaid share was 69, indicating very high variation. For elective cases alone, the mean percentage of Medicaid-funded surgical procedures was 5.5% (range, 0.2% to 64.6%). The mean Medicaid share ratio was 0.71 (range, 0.05 to 4.73), and the weighted coefficient of variation was 93. For trauma cases alone, Medicaid-funded surgical procedures were 14.7% (range, 0.0% to 35.7%). The mean Medicaid share ratio was 2.0 (range, 0 to 3.93), and the weighted coefficient of variation was 34.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of care was highly variable when benchmarking against the insurance composition of each hospital's surrounding community. Although generalizability to other regions is limited, our findings support previously asserted notions that delivery of orthopaedic care may differ on the basis of socioeconomic markers (such as insurance status). If not addressed, these inequities may exacerbate existing racially and socioeconomically based disparities in care.

Medicaid Patients Have Greater Difficulty Scheduling Health Care Appointments Compared With Private Insurance Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Medicaid patients are known to have reduced access to care compared with privately insured patients; however, quantifying this disparity with large controlled studies remains a challenge. This meta-analysis evaluates the disparity in health services accessibility of appointments between Medicaid and privately insured patients through audit studies of health care appointments and schedules. Audit studies evaluating different types of outpatient physician practices were selected. Studies were categorized based on the characteristics of the simulated patient scenario. The relative risk of appointment availability was calculated for all different types of audit scenario characteristics. As a secondary analysis, appointment availability was compared pre- versus post-Medicaid expansion. Overall, 34 audit studies were identified, which demonstrated that Medicaid insurance is associated with a 1.6-fold lower likelihood in successfully scheduling a primary care appointment and a 3.3-fold lower likelihood in successfully scheduling a specialty appointment when compared with private insurance. In this first meta-analysis comparing appointment availability between Medicaid and privately insured patients, we demonstrate Medicaid patients have greater difficulty obtaining appointments compared with privately insured patients across a variety of medical scenarios.

Access to Physical Therapy for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Following Orthopedic Surgery

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between insurance status and access to physical therapy (PT). Masked telephone interviews with PT facilities in a major metropolitan area were conducted with researchers posing as parents of children. Each facility was called twice: once with a private insurer and once with a government insurer. Earliest available appointment, if the facility accepted insurance, and amount of time required to return a call were recorded. Fifty-four PT clinics responded. Clinics that accepted private insurance were significantly greater than the proportion that accepted government insurance (85.2% vs 14.8%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in time between initial call and first offered appointment, in the 2 insurance conditions (private: 8.09 days, government: 8.67 days, P = .33). There were no significant differences in appointment delays between both insurance conditions. Our study found there was a significantly lower rate of children with government-funded insurance that had access to postsurgical rehabilitation.

Influence of Insurance Type on the Access to Pediatric Care for Children With Distal Radius Torus Fractures

BACKGROUND

Previous literature has demonstrated that pediatric orthopaedic patients with private insurance have less difficulty obtaining appointments than those with Medicaid. Not all injuries of an orthopaedic nature, however, require specialist care. This study evaluated the willingness of pediatricians to provide care for minor orthopaedic injuries and whether or not the patient's insurance status influenced the decision to provide care.

METHODS

Ninety-nine pediatric primary care offices were randomly selected from 2 regions in Florida. Each office was contacted twice, 2 to 3 months apart, and presented with a fictionalized account of a patient that had sustained a torus ("buckle") fracture of the distal radius. In the first call, the patient was presented as having private insurance, and in the second call as having Medicaid insurance. If the patient was denied an appointment, the reason was recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 99 offices, 100% were willing to treat the patient's injury if the child had private insurance, compared with 76% if the child had Medicaid. All Medicaid patient refusals were based on the insurance status of the patient. No office refused to see the patient due to the nature of the injury. Ninety-four percent of offices in South Florida were willing to see the Medicaid patient, compared with 58% in Central Florida. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

It was previously unknown whether pediatricians felt comfortable managing minor orthopaedic injuries. This study demonstrates that 100% of the pediatricians surveyed were willing to treat a child with a distal radius buckle fracture with proper insurance. This information potentially can provide additional avenues for patients to achieve timely access to care. However, as seen in previous studies, there was a statistically significant difference in access to care for the same child with Medicaid. Until reimbursement rates for Medicaid improve, these patients will continue to have difficulty obtaining access to care to both primary care providers and specialists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective survey study.

Recurrent Shoulder Instability: Do Morbidity and Treatment Differ Based on Insurance?

Background:

Patients with public insurance often face barriers to obtaining prompt orthopaedic care. For patients with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability, delayed care may be associated with increasing bone loss and subsequently more extensive surgical procedures.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether differences exist in patients undergoing treatment for shoulder instability between those with Medicaid versus non-Medicaid insurance. We hypothesized that at the time of surgery, Medicaid patients would have experienced greater delays in care, would have a more extensive history of instability, would have more bone loss, and would require more extensive surgical procedures than other patients.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Patients were identified who underwent surgical stabilization for traumatic anterior shoulder instability between January 1, 2011, and December 1, 2015, at a single sports medicine practice. Clinic, billing, and operative records were reviewed for each patient to determine age, sex, insurance type, total number of instability episodes, time from first instability episode to surgery, intraoperative findings, and procedure performed. Glenoid bone loss was quantified by use of preoperative imaging studies.

Results:

During this time period, 206 patients (55 Medicaid, 131 private insurance, 11 Tricare, 9 workers’ compensation) underwent surgical stabilization for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Average wait time from initial injury to surgery was 1640 days (95% CI, 1155-2125 days) for Medicaid patients compared with 1237 days (95% CI, 834-1639 days) for others (P = .005). Medicaid patients were more likely to have sustained 5 or more instability events at the time of surgery (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.64-6.69; P = .001), had a higher risk of having 15% or more glenoid bone loss on preoperative imaging (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-10.0; P = .01), and had a higher risk of requiring Latarjet or other open stabilization procedures as opposed to an arthroscopic repair (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-6.2; P = .002) when compared with other patients.

Conclusion:

Among patients undergoing surgery for traumatic anterior shoulder instability, patients with Medicaid had significantly more delayed care. Correspondingly, they reported a more extensive history of instability, were more likely to have severe bone loss, and required more invasive stabilization procedures.

Socioeconomic status impacts outcomes following pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Previous research has shown that delays in pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are associated with increased prevalence of concomitant knee injuries and worse outcomes following surgery. However, few studies have described factors that may contribute to these delays and adverse outcomes. This study seeks to determine the effect of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction.A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a tertiary pediatric hospital between 2009 and 2015 was conducted. Variables included chronologic, demographic, and socioeconomic data, and postoperative complications. Socioeconomic status was measured using health insurance type and median household income levels derived from 2009 to 2015 US Census Bureau.A total of 127 patients (69 male, 58 female) were included. The mean age at time of surgery was 15.0 years. Overall, 68 patients had commercial insurance and 59 patients had government-assisted insurance. The mean household median income for patients with commercial insurance was $87,767 compared to $51,366 for patients with government-assisted insurance. Patients with government-assisted insurance plans demonstrated greater delays in time from injury to initial orthopaedic evaluation (P = .0003), injury to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination (P = .021), injury to surgery (P < .0001), initial orthopaedic evaluation to surgery (P = .0036), and injury to return to play clearance, P = .044. Median household income was significantly related to time from injury to MRI examination (P = .0018), injury to surgery (P = .0017), and initial orthopaedic evaluation to surgery (P = .039). Intraoperatively, 81% of patients with government-assisted insurance had concomitant meniscal injuries compared 65% of patients with commercial insurance, P = .036. Postoperatively, 22% of patients with government-assisted insurance were found to have decreased knee range of motion ("stiffness") compared to 9% of patients with commercial insurance, P = .034.Pediatric patients who have government-assisted plans may experience delays in receiving definitive injury management and be at risk for postoperative complications. Our findings suggest a significant discrepancy in time to treatment as well as rates of concomitant knee injuries and postoperative complications between government and commercial insurance types.Level of Evidence: III.

Variations in Utilization of Carpal Tunnel Release Among Medicaid Beneficiaries

PURPOSE

To evaluate the null hypothesis that Medicaid patients receive carpal tunnel release (CTR) at the same time interval from diagnosis as do patients with Medicare Advantage or private insurance.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review using a database containing claims records from 2007 to 2016. The cohort consisted of patient records with a diagnosis code of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and a procedural code for CTR within 3 years of diagnosis. We stratified patients into 3 groups by insurance type (Medicaid managed care, Medicare Advantage, and private) for an analysis of the time from diagnosis until surgery and use of preoperative electrodiagnostic testing.

RESULTS

Of all patients who received CTR within 3 years of diagnosis, Medicaid patients experienced longer intervals from CTS diagnosis to CTR compared with Medicare Advantage and privately insured patients (median, 99 days vs 65 and 62 days, respectively). The Medicaid cohort was significantly less likely to receive CTR within 1 year of diagnosis compared with the Medicare Advantage cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.54) or within 6 months of diagnosis compared with the privately insured cohort (adjusted OR = 0.61). Those in the Medicaid cohort were less likely to receive electromyography and nerve conduction studies within 9 months before surgery compared with their Medicare Advantage (adjusted OR = 0.43) and privately insured (adjusted OR = 0.41) counterparts. These effects were statistically significant after accounting for age, sex, region, and Charlson comorbidity index.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid managed care patients experience longer times from diagnosis to surgery compared with Medicare Advantage or privately insured patients in this large administrative claims database. Similar variation exists in the use of electrodiagnostic testing based on insurance type.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Medicaid patients may experience barriers to CTS care, such as delays from diagnosis to surgery and reduced use of electrodiagnostic testing.

Does Medicaid Insurance Provide Sufficient Access to Pediatric Orthopedic Care Under the Affordable Care Act?

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act had a profound impact on health insurance coverage of children. Given the importance of pediatric specialty care, this study assessed access to pediatric orthopedic urgent care for a child’s likely operative distal radius fracture. Researchers called 180 pediatric orthopedic surgeons in 8 states requesting appointments for the caller’s fictitious 11-year-old child who suffered a distal radius fracture. Each office was called twice to assess the ability to obtain an appointment for Medicaid and privately insured patients. Overall, significantly fewer offices scheduled appointments for Medicaid than privately insured patients (38.3% vs 82.8%, P < .001). Patients with Medicaid in states without Medicaid expansion were more successful in obtaining appointments than patients with Medicaid in states with Medicaid expansion (41 [47%] vs 28 [30%]; P < .001; 95% confidence interval = 0.3-0.9). Pediatric Medicaid patients experienced reduced access to care, and this access was worse in states that had expanded Medicaid eligibility.

The Impact of Insurance Status on the Development of Nonunion following Scaphoid Fracture

Purpose  Certain factors have been associated with the development of scaphoid nonunion, including delayed diagnosis, smoking, inadequate initial management, proximal location, and carpal instability. We hypothesized that insurance status would also be a risk factor for the development of scaphoid nonunion. Methods  A case-control study was performed on patients who presented to a single surgeon at a tertiary referral center during 2006 to 2015. Cases were patients presenting with nonunions, controls, and patients with acute fractures. Patients were characterized as underinsured if they lacked any type of insurance or if they were on Medicaid. Results  Patients (39 nonunions [cases] and 32 primary fractures [controls]) presenting with nonunions were more likely than controls to have had displaced fractures (72 vs. 41%) and fractures located at the proximal aspect of the scaphoid (18 vs. 0%), and to be underinsured (46 vs. 19%). Conclusion  Patients presenting with nonunions were more likely to be underinsured than patients presenting with primary fractures. This finding suggests that underinsurance is a risk factor for the development of nonunion. Assuming delay between fracture and intervention is a known risk factor for the development of nonunion, and it is likely that the association between nonunion and underinsurance is mediated through this delay. Level of Evidence  Prognostic, level III, case-control study.