The prenatal visit

Barriers to the Identification and Management of Psychosocial Problems: Changes From 2004 to 2013

OBJECTIVE

Pediatricians report many barriers to caring for children with mental health (MH) problems. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has focused attention on MH problems, but the impact on perceived barriers is unknown. We examined whether perceived barriers and their correlates changed from 2004 to 2013.

METHODS

In 2004, 832 (52%) of 1600 and in 2013, 594 (36.7%) of 1617 of randomly selected AAP members surveyed responded to periodic surveys, answering questions about sociodemographics, practice characteristics, and 7 barriers to identifying, treating/managing, and referring child/adolescent MH problems. To reduce nonresponse bias, weighted descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Lack of training in treatment of child MH problems (∼66%) and lack of confidence treating children with counseling (∼60%) did not differ across surveys. Five barriers (lack of training in identifying MH problems, lack of confidence diagnosing, lack of confidence treating with medications, inadequate reimbursement, and lack of time) were less frequently endorsed in 2013 (all P < .01), although lack of time was still endorsed by 70% in 2013. In 2004, 34% of pediatricians endorsed 6 or 7 barriers compared to 26% in 2013 (P < .005). Practicing general pediatrics exclusively was associated with endorsing 6 or 7 barriers in both years (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although fewer barriers were endorsed in 2013, most pediatricians believe that they have inadequate training in treating child MH problems, a lack of confidence to counsel children, and limited time for these problems. These findings suggest significant barriers still exist, highlighting the need for improved developmental and behavioral pediatrics training.

Improving newborn preventive services at the birth hospitalization: a collaborative, hospital-based quality-improvement project

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to test the effectiveness of a statewide, collaborative, hospital-based quality-improvement project targeting preventive services delivered to healthy newborns during the birth hospitalization.

METHODS

All Vermont hospitals with obstetric services participated. The quality-improvement collaborative (intervention) was based on the Breakthrough Series Collaborative model. Targeted preventive services included hepatitis B immunization; assessment of breastfeeding; assessment of risk of hyperbilirubinemia; performance of metabolic and hearing screens; assessment of and counseling on tobacco smoke exposure, infant sleep position, car safety seat fit, and exposure to domestic violence; and planning for outpatient follow-up care. The effect of the intervention was assessed at the end of an 18-month period. Preintervention and postintervention chart audits were conducted by using a random sample of 30 newborn medical charts per audit for each participating hospital.

RESULTS

Documented rates of assessment improved for breastfeeding adequacy (49% vs 81%), risk for hyperbilirubinemia (14% vs 23%), infant sleep position (13% vs 56%), and car safety seat fit (42% vs 71%). Documented rates of counseling improved for tobacco smoke exposure (23% vs 53%) and car safety seat fit (38% vs 75%). Performance of hearing screens also improved (74% vs 97%). No significant changes were noted in performance of hepatitis B immunization (45% vs 30%) or metabolic screens (98% vs 98%), assessment of tobacco smoke exposure (53% vs 67%), counseling on sleep position (46% vs 68%), assessment of exposure to domestic violence (27% vs 36%), or planning for outpatient follow-up care (80% vs 71%). All hospitals demonstrated preintervention versus postintervention improvement of > or = 20% in > or = 1 newborn preventive service.

CONCLUSIONS

A statewide, hospital-based quality-improvement project targeting hospital staff members and community physicians was effective in improving documented newborn preventive services during the birth hospitalization.

Environmental tobacco smoke exposure: prevalence and mechanisms of causation of infections in children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is probably one of the most important public health hazards in our community. Our aim with this article is to (1) review the prevalence of ETS exposure in the United States and how this prevalence is often measured in practice and (2) summarize current thinking concerning the mechanism by which this exposure may cause infections in young children.

METHODS

We conducted a Medline search to obtain data published mainly in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

There is still a very high prevalence of ETS exposure among US children ranging from 35% to 80% depending on the method of measurement used and the population studied. The mechanism by which ETS may be related to these infections is not entirely clear but may be through suppression or modulation of the immune system, enhancement of bacterial adherence factors, or impairment of the mucociliary apparatus of the respiratory tract, or possibly through enhancement of toxicity of low levels of certain toxins that are not easily detected by conventional means.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ETS exposure in the United States is still very high, and its role in causing infections in children is no longer in doubt even if still poorly understood. Research, therefore, should continue to focus on the various mechanisms of causation of these infections and how to best reduce the exposure levels.

The newborn screening educational gap: what prenatal care providers do compared with what is expected

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this evaluation was to examine prenatal care providers' knowledge of, attitudes towards, and barriers for providing information about newborn screening and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) screening.

STUDY DESIGN

We mailed a 12-question survey to 6197 prenatal care providers in California asking about their experiences with newborn and prenatal screening services.

RESULTS

Although 4/5 of respondents believe newborn screening is very important for their patients, only 1/3 discuss it with all their patients. Over half believe either pediatricians (38%) or hospital staff (36%) will discuss newborn screening. Only 61% of providers give their patients the newborn screening educational booklet, even though California law requires that the booklet be provided to all pregnant women.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women and state professionals rely on prenatal care providers to educate pregnant women about newborn screening; however, many providers do not appear to view it as part of their responsibility. Therefore, the state needs to improve communication with both providers and the public about newborn screening.

Thinking outside the box: prenatal care and the call for a prenatal advance directive

The concept of advance directives is well-known in the care of adults as a mechanism for choosing in advance the extent of medical interventions desired in clinical situations, particularly life-extending interventions such as ventilation support and drugs to maintain cardiopulmonary status. Infants born extremely prematurely often require life-supporting measures for which their parents or guardians report feeling unprepared to make decisions about. Current prenatal care does not include an educational component that teaches women about the length of gestation needed for a healthy viability, survivorship, and outcome without major impairment. Women who go into preterm labor are asked to make immediate decisions during times of crisis without any formal education base for this decision making. Feminist ethics (the philosophical stance that articulates that women's moral experience is worthy of respect and disallows women's subordination) (Becker LB, Becker CB, eds. Feminist ethics. In: Encyclopedia of Ethics. New York: Routledge Press; 2001) requires that healthcare decisions be based on education, context, and particular situations. The purpose of this article is to examine the current content of typical prenatal care and education and to suggest an additional educational component to prenatal care-education of women about infant viability and the planning of future decisions if a nonviable or critically ill newborn is delivered. A prenatal discussion and parental/family directive is suggested.