Levetiracetam Versus Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Accurate prediction of neurologic changes in critically ill infants using pose AI

Importance

Infant alertness and neurologic changes are assessed by exam, which can be intermittent and subjective. Reliable, continuous methods are needed.

Objective

We hypothesized that our computer vision method to track movement, pose AI, could predict neurologic changes.

Design

Retrospective observational study from 2021-2022.

Setting

A level four urban neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Participants

Infants with corrected age ≤1 year, comprising 115 patients with 4,705 hours of video data linked to electroencephalograms (EEG), including 46% female and 25.2% white non-Hispanic.

Exposures

Pose AI prediction of anatomic landmark position and an XGBoost classifier trained on one-minute variance in pose.

Main outcomes and measures

Outcomes were cerebral dysfunction, diagnosed from EEG readings by an epileptologist, and sedation, defined by the administration of sedative medications. Measures of algorithm performance were receiver operating characteristic-area under the curves (ROC-AUCs) on cross-validation and on two test datasets comprised of held-out infants and held-out video frames from infants used in training.

Results

Infant pose was accurately predicted in cross-validation, held-out frames, and held-out infants (respective ROC-AUCs 0.94, 0.83, 0.89). Median movement increased with age and, after accounting for age, was lower with sedative medications and in infants with cerebral dysfunction (all P<5×10-3, 10,000 permutations). Sedation prediction had high performance on cross-validation, held-out frames, and held-out infants (ROC-AUCs 0.90, 0.91, 0.87), as did prediction of cerebral dysfunction (ROC-AUCs 0.91, 0.90, 0.76).

Conclusions and Relevance

We used pose AI to predict sedation and cerebral dysfunction in 4,705 hours of video from a large, diverse cohort of infants. Pose AI may offer a scalable, minimally invasive method for neuro-telemetry in the NICU.

Comparative Outcomes of Levetiracetam and Phenobarbital Usage in the Treatment of Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES AND AIM

The primary aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) and phenobarbital (PB) as first-line treatments for neonatal seizure management. This study was designed to measure and compare the incidence of adverse effects and to determine the discharge and mortality rates associated with the use of these antiseizure medications (ASMs). Through this comparison, this research sought to provide insights to optimise care for neonates experiencing seizures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 104 neonates treated for seizures at Zeynep Kamil Hospital from 2015 to 2020 after excluding those on non-PB/LEV antiseizure medications. Seizures were characterised using electroencephalogram (EEG) and categorised according to aetiology and frequency. Treatment efficacy was gauged by seizure cessation, as confirmed using EEG. Adverse effects and demographic data were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, employing the Shapiro-Wilk, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 104 neonates treated with first-line ASM were evaluated for efficacy; PB was administered in 68.26% of the cases, while LEV was utilised in 31.74%. The total complete response rate was 40.38%, with no significant difference between the PB and LEV groups (p = 0.309). The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) demonstrated that seizure frequency profoundly influenced treatment effectiveness, with IRRs of 2.09 for rare seizures, 3.25 for frequent seizures, and 4.01 for status epilepticus, indicating a higher treatment response rate with increasing seizure frequency. For second-line treatment, among a subset of 62 patients, PB had a slight, non-significant advantage over LEV, with an odds ratio of 1.09, suggesting a marginally better response to LEV. Adverse events were significantly more frequent in the PB group, affecting 19 of 67 neonates (28.36%), compared to only 2 of 71 neonates (2.82%) in the LEV group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discharge rates between the two groups (PB, 67.61%; LEV, 75.76%; p = 0.674). Interestingly, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the LEV group (45.45%) than that in the PB group (22.54%; p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

This study underscores LEV's superior safety profile over PB in neonatal seizure management, evidenced by a significantly lower rate of adverse events. PB seems to be more effective in the second-line treatment of neonatal seizures. Despite the lack of significant differences in the discharge rates, the higher mortality rate associated with LEV warrants further investigation. These findings advocate the cautious selection of antiepileptic drugs in neonatal care, with a preference for LEV based on its safety profile.

Comparison of the effect of phenobarbital & levetiracetam in the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) as adjuvant treatment in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Infants who are born from mothers with substance use disorder might suffer from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and need treatment with medicines. One of these medicines is phenobarbital, which may cause side effects in long-term consumption. Alternative drugs can be used to reduce these side effects. This study seeks the comparison of the effects of phenobarbital & levetiracetam as adjuvant therapy in neonatal abstinence syndrome.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was performed in one year from May 2021 until May 2022. The neonates who were born from mothers with substance use disorder and had neonatal abstinence syndrome in Afzalipoor Hospital of Kerman were studied. The treatment started with morphine initially and every four hours the infants were checked. The infants who were diagnosed with uncontrolled symptoms After obtaining informed consent from the parents were randomly divided into two groups and treated with secondary drugs, either phenobarbital or levetiracetam.

RESULTS

Based on the obtained results, it was clear that there was no significant difference between the hospitalization time of the two infant groups under therapy (phenobarbital: 18.59 days versus Levetiracetam 18.24 days) (P-value = 0.512). Also, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of the frequency of re-hospitalization during the first week after discharge, the occurrence of complications, and third treatment line prescription (P-value = 0.644).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the obtained results, like hospitalization duration time (P-value = 0.512) it seems that levetiracetam can be used to substitute phenobarbital in treating neonatal abstinence syndrome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current study has been registered in the Iran registry of clinical trials website (fa.irct.ir) on the date 25/2/2022 with registration no. IRCT20211218053444N2.

Epilepsy Incidence and Developmental Outcomes After Early Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medication in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures caused by hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) have significant morbidity and mortality. There is variability in clinical practice regarding treatment duration with antiseizure medication (ASM) after resolution of provoked neonatal seizures. We examined epilepsy incidence and developmental outcomes in post-HIE neonates discharged or not on ASM.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all HIE-admitted neonates to the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics neonatal intensive care unit between January 2008 and February 2021 who presented with encephalopathy, underwent therapeutic hypothermia, and developed seizures. Neonates were divided into two groups depending on whether ASM was continued or discontinued on discharge. We evaluated the incidence of epilepsy and developmental outcomes on follow-up in these two cohorts up to 12 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine neonates met the study criteria. ASM was continued on discharge in 41 neonates (59%) and discontinued before discharge in 28 (41%). At the 12-month follow-up, nine neonates (13%) had a diagnosis of epilepsy, out of which seven neonates had ASM continued on discharge (odds ratio [OR]: 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48, 29.9)]. There was no statistical difference between the development of postneonatal epilepsy between the two groups (P value 0.29). There was no significant difference in developmental outcome between the two groups after adjusting for covariates like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain abnormality and number of seizure days (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.21, 2.22; P = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant risk of seizure recurrence by age 12 months in infants who had discontinued ASM before discharge compared with those who had continued ASM. There was no difference in developmental outcomes at the 12-month follow-up between groups after adjusting for brain MRI abnormality and the number of seizure days during admission. Our results support early discontinuation of ASM after resolution of acute provoked seizures in neonates with HIE.

Early life phenobarbital exposure dysregulates the hippocampal transcriptome

Introduction: Phenobarbital (PB) and levetiracetam (LEV) are the first-line therapies for neonates with diagnosed seizures, however, a growing body of evidence shows that these drugs given during critical developmental windows trigger lasting molecular changes in the brain. While the targets and mechanism of action of these drugs are well understood-what is not known is how these drugs alter the transcriptomic landscape, and therefore molecular profile/gene expression during these critical windows of neurodevelopment. PB is associated with a range of neurotoxic effects in developing animals, from cell death to altered synaptic development to lasting behavioral impairment. LEV does not produce these effects. Methods: Here we evaluated the effects of PB and Lev on the hippocampal transcriptome by RNA sequencing. Neonatal rat pups were given a single dose of PB, Lev or vehicle and sacrificed 72 h later-at time at which drug is expected to be cleared. Results: We found PB induces broad changes in the transcriptomic profile (124 differentially expressed transcripts), as compared to relatively small changes in LEV-treated animals (15 transcripts). PB exposure decreased GABAergic and oligodendrocyte markers pvalb and opalin, and increased the marker of activated microglia, cd68 and the astrocyte- associated gene vegfa. These data are consistent with the existing literature showing developmental neurotoxicity associated with PB, but not LEV. Discussion: The widespread change in gene expression after PB, which affected transcripts reflective of multiple cell types, may provide a link between acute drug administration and lasting drug toxicity.

Deep Learning for Generalized EEG Seizure Detection after Hypoxia-Ischemia-Preclinical Validation

Brain maturity and many clinical treatments such as therapeutic hypothermia (TH) can significantly influence the morphology of neonatal EEG seizures after hypoxia-ischemia (HI), and so there is a need for generalized automatic seizure identification. This study validates efficacy of advanced deep-learning pattern classifiers based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) for seizure detection after HI in fetal sheep and determines the effects of maturation and brain cooling on their accuracy. The cohorts included HI-normothermia term (n = 7), HI-hypothermia term (n = 14), sham-normothermia term (n = 5), and HI-normothermia preterm (n = 14) groups, with a total of >17,300 h of recordings. Algorithms were trained and tested using leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation approaches. The accuracy of the term-trained seizure detectors was consistently excellent for HI-normothermia preterm data (accuracy = 99.5%, area under curve (AUC) = 99.2%). Conversely, when the HI-normothermia preterm data were used in training, the performance on HI-normothermia term and HI-hypothermia term data fell (accuracy = 98.6%, AUC = 96.5% and accuracy = 96.9%, AUC = 89.6%, respectively). Findings suggest that HI-normothermia preterm seizures do not contain all the spectral features seen at term. Nevertheless, an average 5-fold cross-validated accuracy of 99.7% (AUC = 99.4%) was achieved from all seizure detectors. This significant advancement highlights the reliability of the proposed deep-learning algorithms in identifying clinically translatable post-HI stereotypic seizures in 256Hz recordings, regardless of maturity and with minimal impact from hypothermia.

Enhancing GABAergic Tonic Inhibition Reduces Seizure-Like Activity in the Neonatal Mouse Hippocampus and Neocortex

Approximately one-third of neonatal seizures do not respond to first-line anticonvulsants, including phenobarbital, which enhances phasic inhibition. Whether enhancing tonic inhibition decreases seizure-like activity in the neonate when GABA is mainly depolarizing at this age is unknown. We evaluated if increasing tonic inhibition using THIP [4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo(5,4-c)pyridin-3-ol, gaboxadol], a δ-subunit-selective GABAA receptor agonist, decreases seizure-like activity in neonatal C57BL/6J mice (postnatal day P5-8, both sexes) using acute brain slices. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings showed that THIP enhanced GABAergic tonic inhibitory conductances in layer V neocortical and CA1 pyramidal neurons and increased their rheobase without altering sEPSC characteristics. Two-photon calcium imaging demonstrated that enhancing the activity of extrasynaptic GABAARs decreased neuronal firing in both brain regions. In the 4-aminopyridine and the low-Mg2+ model of pharmacoresistant seizures, THIP reduced epileptiform activity in the neocortex and CA1 hippocampal region of neonatal and adult brain slices in a dose-dependent manner. We conclude that neocortical layer V and CA1 pyramidal neurons have tonic inhibitory conductances, and when enhanced, they reduce neuronal firing and decrease seizure-like activity. Therefore, augmenting tonic inhibition could be a viable approach for treating neonatal seizures.

Risk assessment of arrhythmias related to three antiseizure medications: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Objective

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are first line therapy for seizure disorders. Their effects on arrhythmias, especially the risk of arrhythmias associated with lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), and perampanel (PER), have been intensely investigated.

Methods

We searched four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) until August 6, 2023. We used a common effects model and reported data as pooled incidence with 95% CIs. Meta-analyses were conducted to elucidate the risk of arrhythmias with different drugs, and Egger's regression was performed to detect publication bias analysis.

Results

We included 11 clinical trials with 1,031 participants. The pooled incidence of arrhythmias in the LEV group was 0.005 (95% CI: 0.001-0.013), while it was 0.014 in the LCM group (95% CI: 0.003-0.030). Publication bias analyses indicated no significant bias in the LEV group (t = 0.02, df = 4, p-value = 0.9852) but a significant bias in the LCM group (t = 5.94, df = 3, p-value = 0.0095). We corrected for this bias in the LCM group using the trim-and-fill method, which yielded a similar pooled incidence of 0.0137 (95% CI: 0.0036-0.0280), indicating good reliability. Due to insufficient studies, we could not conduct a meta-analysis for PER, and we analyzed them in our systematic review.

Conclusion

The use of LCM significantly elevated the risk of arrhythmias, while LEV had non-significant arrhythmogenic effects. As for the arrhythmogenic effects of PER, more clinical trials are needed in the future.

Relationship of Neonatal Seizure Burden Before Treatment and Response to Initial Antiseizure Medication

OBJECTIVE

To assess among a cohort of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) the association of pretreatment maximal hourly seizure burden and total seizure duration with successful response to initial antiseizure medication (ASM).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of data collected from infants enrolled in the HEAL Trial (NCT02811263) between January 25, 2017, and October 9, 2019. We evaluated a cohort of neonates born at ≥36 weeks of gestation with moderate-to-severe HIE who underwent continuous electroencephalogram monitoring and had acute symptomatic seizures. Poisson regression analyzed associations between (1) pretreatment maximal hourly seizure burden, (2) pretreatment total seizure duration, (3) time from first seizure to initial ASM, and (4) successful response to initial ASM.

RESULTS

Among 39 neonates meeting inclusion criteria, greater pretreatment maximal hourly seizure burden was associated with lower chance of successful response to initial ASM (adjusted relative risk for each 5-minute increase in seizure burden 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99). There was no association between pretreatment total seizure duration and chance of successful response. Shorter time-to-treatment was paradoxically associated with lower chance of successful response to treatment, although this difference was small in magnitude (relative risk 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal seizure burden may be more important than other, more commonly used measures in predicting response to acute seizure treatments.

Seizures after initiation of rewarming in cooled infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Seizures after initiation of rewarming from therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy are well recognised but not easy to predict.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was performed of NEOLEV2 trial data, a multicentre randomised trial of levetiracetam versus phenobarbital for neonatal seizures. Enrolled infants underwent continuous video EEG (cEEG) monitoring. The trial data were reviewed for 42 infants with seizures during therapeutic hypothermia and 118 infants who received therapeutic hypothermia but had no seizures on cEEG.

RESULTS

Overall, 112 of 160 (70%) had cEEG monitoring continued until rewarming was completed. Of the 42 infants with prior seizures, there were 30 infants with valid cEEG available and seizures occurred following the initiation of rewarming in 8 (26.6%). For the 118 seizure-naive infants, 82 (69.5%) continued cEEG until either rewarming was completed or 90 h of age and none had documented seizures.

CONCLUSION

Overall, just over a quarter of infants with prior seizures had cEEG evidence of at least one seizure in the 24 h after initiation of rewarming but no seizure-naive infant had cEEG evidence of seizure(s) on rewarming. Critically, by reporting the two groups separately, the data can provide guidance on the duration of EEG monitoring.

IMPACT

Infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy who have cEEG evidence of seizures during therapeutic hypothermia have a significant risk of further seizures on rewarming. For infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy but no cEEG evidence of seizures during therapeutic hypothermia, there is very little risk of de novo seizures. Ongoing work utilising large cohorts may generate EEG criteria that refine estimates of risk for rewarming seizures. Based on current experience, if seizures have occurred during therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, the EEG monitoring should be continued during rewarming and for 12 h thereafter to minimise the risk of missing an event.

Neonatal Seizures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for the Management

Neonatal seizures are a common cause of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Over the recent decades, there have been significant improvements in perinatal and neonatal medicine and electroencephalograp hic monitoring that have enhanced the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal seizures in highincome countries. However, the management of neonatal seizures remains a major challenge in low- to middle-income countries, where the availabilityof resources is limited. The purpose of this article is to present a comprehensive review of the current evidence on the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neonatal seizures and to offer practical management recommendations that could be implemented in resource-limited settings. Cite this article as: Spenard S, Ivan Salazar Cerda C, Cizmeci MN. Neonatal seizures in low and middleincome countries: Review of the literature and recommendations for the management. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(1):13-22.

Questions and Controversies in Neonatal Seizures

Neonatal seizures are relatively common, but their diagnosis and management remain challenging. We reviewed the scientific literature on neonatal seizures from July 1973 to November 2023. Several parameters were considered, including pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, electroencephalographic findings and treatment. Recent classification system of seizures and epilepsies in the newborn, as well as treatment recommendations of neonatal seizures, have been proposed. Nonetheless, the approach to neonatal seizures varies among clinicians and centres, including detection, investigation, treatment and follow-up of patients. There are still many issues on the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal seizures, including the meaning or relevance of some electroencephalographic findings, the precise estimation of the seizure burden, the limited efficacy and side effects risk of antiseizure medications, and the best measures to establish the outcome.

Efficacy of Levetiracetam as Add-On Therapy in the Treatment of Seizures in Neonates

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus regarding the efficacy of add-on therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of seizures in neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of add-on therapy with LEV for achieving >80% seizure reduction after phenobarbital (PB) treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of near term neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with EEG-confirmed seizures despite treatment with PB as first-line therapy and using LEV as 2nd-, 3rd- or 4th-line treatment. Antiseizure medication was administered according to national guidelines. All neonates were monitored with 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. The total seizure burden in minutes, 2 h before and 4 h after administration of LEV, was calculated using raw EEG. Primary outcome was the efficacy of LEV in achieving >80% seizure reduction. The efficacy of additional midazolam (MDZ) and lidocaine (LDC) was also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 full-term neonates were included. The mean total loading dose of LEV was 40 mg/kg (36-44 mg/kg). Seizure etiology consisted of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n = 11), hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke (n = 16), central nervous system infection (n = 8), genetic (n = 8), metabolic disorders (n = 3), and unknown (n = 1). Following LEV administration, >80% seizure reduction was observed in 17% (8/47) of neonates, whereas it was 23% (6/26) after MDZ and 92% (23/25) after LDC administration.

DISCUSSION

Although the cumulative loading dose of LEV was low and the group of infants studied was heterogeneous, the efficacy of LEV as add-on therapy for the treatment of seizures in neonates was limited. The highest seizure reduction rate was seen after LDC administration.

[Neonatal seizures and progression to epilepsy in a tertiary hospital]

INTRODUCTION

Given the immaturity of the newborn, neonatal seizures are a diagnostic challenge. Most of them are secondary to an acute event. A small percentage constitute the onset of epilepsy.

AIMS

The aim was to analyse neonates with a diagnosis of seizures admitted to a tertiary hospital between November 2009 and May 2021, and their subsequent progression to epilepsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was carried out using the hospital database. Information was collected on neonates with a discharge diagnosis of 'seizures' or 'moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy'. Different variables were analysed: aetiology of the seizures, type, persistence over time, treatment and electroclinical correlates.

RESULTS

Of 165 patients, 55 presented neonatal seizures. As regards aetiology, 43 patients (78%) had seizures secondary to an acute event, of which 19 (34%) were hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathies, and 22 (40%) had other acute disorders. Genetic alteration was found in six of them (11%). Thirteen patients (24%) progressed to subsequent epilepsy, of whom seven had symptomatic epilepsy, with a period of latency after the acute event in two patients. Six patients had neonatal epilepsy with unprovoked seizures. Twenty-two (62%) showed electroclinical correlates. All of the confirmed crises (100%) were focal. All the seizures were treated. The drug of choice was phenobarbital.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of neonatal seizures requires high clinical suspicion and electroclinical confirmation. Most of them progress favourably, but a percentage constitute the onset of epilepsy, the identification of which will determine their therapeutic management.

Levetiracetam versus Phenobarbitone for Management of Neonatal Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review whether levetiracetam is non-inferior to phenobarbitone as the first-choice antiseizure medication (ASM).

METHODS

The authors searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 31, 2023. RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenobarbitone as first-line ASM in neonatal seizures were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed, and the Risk of Bias version 2 tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs enrolling 821 neonates [mostly term, with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)] were included. There was no significant difference in seizure control between levetiracetam and phenobarbitone (10 RCTs, 786 participants; relative risk RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.54; I2- 88%). Neonates in the levetiracetam group had a significantly lower incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.86), respiratory depression (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.66), and depressed sensorium (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.00). Three studies compared neurodevelopmental outcomes; however two of them were cross-over trials where infants received both drugs. Only one RCT enrolled pure cohorts and showed better neurodevelopment in the levetiracetam group at one month of age.

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitation of very-low certainty evidence, the results of this systematic review suggest that levetiracetam may be non-inferior to phenobarbitone for managing neonatal seizures. Considering a better safety profile and marginally better neurodevelopment in the short term, levetiracetam may be considered an initial choice for managing neonatal seizures.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (CRD42023438018).

Remote Monitoring for Seizures During Therapeutic Hypothermia in Neonates With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Importance

Neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) frequently experience seizures, which are associated with adverse outcomes. Efforts to rapidly identify seizures and reduce seizure burden may positively change neurologic and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Objective

To describe the onset, treatment, and evolution of seizures in a large cohort of newborns with HIE during TH assisted by a telehealth model and remote neuromonitoring approach.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study performed between July 2017 and December 2021 in 32 hospitals in Brazil. Participants were newborns with HIE meeting eligibility criteria and receiving TH. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to April 2023.

Exposure

Infants with HIE receiving TH were remotely monitored with 3-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) including raw tracing and video imaging, and bedside clinicians received assistance from trained neonatologists and neurologists.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data on modified Sarnat examination, presence, timing and seizure type, aEEG background activity, sleep-wake cycling, and antiepileptic drugs used were collected. Descriptive statistical analysis was used with independent t test, χ2, Mann-Whitney test, and post hoc analyses applied for associations.

Results

A total of 872 cooled newborns were enrolled; the median (IQR) gestational age was 39 (38-40) weeks, 518 (59.4%) were male, and 59 (6.8%) were classified as having mild encephalopathy by modified Sarnat examination, 504 (57.8%) as moderate, and 180 (20.6%) as severe. Electrographic seizures were identified in 296 newborns (33.9%), being only electrographic in 213 (71.9%) and clinical followed by electroclinical uncoupling in 50 (16.9%). Early abnormal background activity had a significant association with seizures. Infants with flat trace had the highest rate of seizures (58 infants [68.2%]) and the greatest association with the incidence of seizures (odds ratio [OR], 12.90; 95% CI, 7.57-22.22) compared with continuous normal voltage. The absence of sleep-wake cycling was also associated with a higher occurrence of seizures (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.67-2.96). Seizure onset was most frequent between 6 and 24 hours of life (181 infants [61.1%]); however, seizure occurred in 34 infants (11.5%) during rewarming. A single antiepileptic drug controlled seizures in 192 infants (64.9%). The first line antiepileptic drug was phenobarbital in 294 (99.3%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of newborns with HIE treated with TH, electrographic seizure activity occurred in 296 infants (33.9%) and was predominantly electrographic. Seizure control was obtained with a single antiepileptic drug in 192 infants (64.9%). These findings suggest neonatal neurocritical care can be delivered at remote limited resource hospitals due to innovations in technology and telehealth.

Thyroid Hormone Levels in Preterm Neonates with Birth Weight Less than 2500 g, Treated with Phenobarbital

Objectives

Indicatively, phenobarbital can impair thyroid function in adults and children. The present research aims to evaluate the thyroid hormone levels in preterm neonates who had received phenobarbital treatment.

Materials &Methods

This study was conducted on preterm neonates who weighed less or equal to 2500 g when phenobarbital was prescribed for treatment in the first 15 days of life. TSH and total T4 measurements were performed before and three months after initiation of phenobarbital.

Results

In this study, the sum of preterm neonates stood at 94, of which 53 were girls, with a mean birth weight of 2004.41 ± 315.41g. Weight of 8.5% were under 1500 g. The mean gestational age was estimated at 33.64 ± 2.01 weeks. Mean T4 levels were 12.24 ± 1.96 and 12.07 ± 1.95 (p=0.334), and mean TSH levels were 5.34 ± 2.14 and5.15 ± 2.15 (p=0.376) before and after prescribing phenobarbital, respectively. The same results were compared based on sex, gestational age, birth weight, and height for T4 and TSH and T4 based on head circumference. The only significant difference was TSH in preterm infants with head circumference <32 cm before and after prescribing phenobarbital (p=0.030).

Conclusion

In preterm newborns that had less than 2500 g birth weight, phenobarbital did not significantly alter the serum thyroid hormone levels.

Anti-seizure medications for neonates with seizures

BACKGROUND

Newborn infants are more prone to seizures than older children and adults. The neuronal injury caused by seizures in neonates often results in long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. There are several options for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in neonates. However, the ideal choice of first-, second- and third-line ASM is still unclear. Further, many other aspects of seizure management such as whether ASMs should be initiated for only-electrographic seizures and how long to continue the ASM once seizure control is achieved are elusive.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess whether any ASM is more or less effective than an alternative ASM (both ASMs used as first-, second- or third-line treatment) in achieving seizure control and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with seizures. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 2. To assess maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy after achieving seizure control. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 3. To assess treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos and three databases in May 2022 and June 2023. These searches were not limited other than by study design to trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included neonates with EEG-confirmed or clinically diagnosed seizures and compared (1) any ASM versus an alternative ASM, (2) maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy, and (3) treatment of clinical or EEG seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and independently extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 trials (1342 infants) in this review. Phenobarbital versus levetiracetam as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) Phenobarbital is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after first loading dose (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.63 to 3.30; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and after maximal loading dose (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.78 to 4.50; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital when compared to levetiracetam on mortality before discharge (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.52; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), requirement of mechanical ventilation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.91; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), sedation/drowsiness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.44; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.76; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Phenobarbital versus phenytoin as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) We are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital versus phenytoin on achieving seizure control after maximal loading dose of ASM (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.72; 59 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy in clinically diagnosed neonatal seizures (two trials) We are uncertain about the effect of short-term maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy during the hospital stay (but discontinued before discharge) on the risk of repeat seizures before hospital discharge (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.01; 373 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Maintenance therapy with ASM compared to no maintenance therapy may have little or no effect on mortality before discharge (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.22; 373 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.61; 111 participants; low-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.12; 108 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 14.72; 126 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates (two trials) Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation (MD -1871.16, 95% CI -4525.05 to 782.73; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality before discharge (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.27; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.73; 35 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. We report data from the most important comparisons here; readers are directed to Results and Summary of Findings tables for all comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Phenobarbital as a first-line ASM is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after the first loading dose and after the maximal loading dose of ASM (moderate-certainty evidence). Phenobarbital + bumetanide may have little or no difference in achieving seizure control when compared to phenobarbital alone (low-certainty evidence). Limited data and very low-certainty evidence preclude us from drawing any reasonable conclusion on the effect of using one ASM versus another on other short- and long-term outcomes. In neonates who achieve seizure control after the first loading dose of phenobarbital, maintenance therapy compared to no maintenance ASM may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality before discharge, mortality by 18 to 24 months, neurodevelopmental disability by 18 to 24 months and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). In neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation, all-cause mortality before discharge and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). All findings of this review apply only to term and late preterm neonates. We need well-designed RCTs for each of the three objectives of this review to improve the precision of the results. These RCTs should use EEG to diagnose seizures and should be adequately powered to assess long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We need separate RCTs evaluating the choice of ASM in preterm infants.

Neuroprotective strategies for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage: Current status and challenges

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage (HIBD) is a prominent contributor to both immediate mortality and long-term impairment in newborns. The elusive nature of the underlying mechanisms responsible for neonatal HIBD presents a significant obstacle in the effective clinical application of numerous pharmaceutical interventions. This comprehensive review aims to concentrate on the potential neuroprotective agents that have demonstrated efficacy in addressing various pathogenic factors associated with neonatal HIBD, encompassing oxidative stress, calcium overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammatory response, and apoptosis. In this review, we conducted an analysis of the precise molecular pathways by which these drugs elicit neuroprotective effects in animal models of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBD). Our objective was to provide a comprehensive overview of potential neuroprotective agents for the treatment of neonatal HIBD in animal experiments, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the feasibility of clinical translation and establishing a solid theoretical foundation for the clinical management of neonatal HIBD.

Treatment of seizures in the neonate: Guidelines and consensus-based recommendations-Special report from the ILAE Task Force on Neonatal Seizures

Seizures are common in neonates, but there is substantial management variability. The Neonatal Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed evidence-based recommendations about antiseizure medication (ASM) management in neonates in accordance with ILAE standards. Six priority questions were formulated, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed, and results were reported following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 standards. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool and risk of Bias in non-randomised studies - of interventions (ROBINS-I), and quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE). If insufficient evidence was available, then expert opinion was sought using Delphi consensus methodology. The strength of recommendations was defined according to the ILAE Clinical Practice Guidelines development tool. There were six main recommendations. First, phenobarbital should be the first-line ASM (evidence-based recommendation) regardless of etiology (expert agreement), unless channelopathy is likely the cause for seizures (e.g., due to family history), in which case phenytoin or carbamazepine should be used. Second, among neonates with seizures not responding to first-line ASM, phenytoin, levetiracetam, midazolam, or lidocaine may be used as a second-line ASM (expert agreement). In neonates with cardiac disorders, levetiracetam may be the preferred second-line ASM (expert agreement). Third, following cessation of acute provoked seizures without evidence for neonatal-onset epilepsy, ASMs should be discontinued before discharge home, regardless of magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalographic findings (expert agreement). Fourth, therapeutic hypothermia may reduce seizure burden in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (evidence-based recommendation). Fifth, treating neonatal seizures (including electrographic-only seizures) to achieve a lower seizure burden may be associated with improved outcome (expert agreement). Sixth, a trial of pyridoxine may be attempted in neonates presenting with clinical features of vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy and seizures unresponsive to second-line ASM (expert agreement). Additional considerations include a standardized pathway for the management of neonatal seizures in each neonatal unit and informing parents/guardians about the diagnosis of seizures and initial treatment options.

A novel approach to seizures in neonates

THE CHALLENGE OF SEIZURE RECOGNITION

Recognition of seizures in neonates remains the foremost challenge to overcome. All neonates at risk for seizures, especially the critically ill, should undergo video-EEG monitoring. The initial step toward an accurate diagnosis is the accurate description and interpretation of the electro-clinical phenotype. THE IMPORTANCE OF SEIZURE SEMIOLOGY AND ASSOCIATION WITH ETIOLOGY: The early distinction between acute provoked seizures and neonatal-onset epilepsies serves as the primary determinant for guiding management, treatment choices, and duration. Seizures in neonates should be seen as a symptom, not a disease, and their semiology may suggest the etiology.

TREATMENT OF ACUTE PROVOKED SEIZURES

Neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy respond best to phenobarbital, while levetiracetam is a better choice for neonates with congenital heart diseases. Anti-seizure medication can be discontinued after 72 h of seizure freedom, before discharge from the hospital.

TREATMENT OF NEONATAL EPILEPSIES

Neonates with epilepsy usually require a personalized, etiology-based approach in terms of choice and duration of treatment. Neonates with channelopathies tend to respond to sodium channel blockers such as carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or phenytoin. The surgical option should be considered early in cases of large brain malformations, such as hemimegalencephaly.

Efficacy and safety of ketamine for neonatal refractory status epilepticus: case report and systematic review

Background

Evidence-based data on treatment of neonatal status epilepticus (SE) are scarce. We aimed to collect data on the efficacy and safety of ketamine for the treatment of neonatal SE and to assess its possible role in the treatment of neonatal SE.

Methods

We described a novel case and conducted a systematic literature review on neonatal SE treated with ketamine. The search was carried out in Pubmed, Cochrane, Clinical Trial Gov, Scopus and Web of Science.

Results

Seven published cases of neonatal SE treated with ketamine were identified and analyzed together with our novel case. Seizures typically presented during the first 24 h of life (6/8). Seizures were resistant to a mean of five antiseizure medications. Ketamine, a NMDA receptor antagonist, appeared to be safe and effective in all neonates treated. Neurologic sequelae including hypotonia and spasticity were reported for 4/5 of the surviving children (5/8). 3/5 of them were seizure free at 1-17 months of life.

Discussion

Neonatal brain is more susceptible to seizures due to a shift towards increased excitation because of a paradoxical excitatory effect of GABA, a greater density of NMDA receptors and higher extracellular concentrations of glutamate. Status epilepticus and neonatal encephalopathy could further enhance these mechanisms, providing a rationale for the use of ketamine in this setting.

Conclusions

Ketamine in the treatment of neonatal SE showed a promising efficacy and safety profile. However, further in-depth studies and clinical trials on larger populations are needed.

High Effectiveness of Midazolam and Lidocaine in the Treatment of Acute Neonatal Seizures

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical effectiveness of treating acute seizures with midazolam and lidocaine infusion.

METHODS

This single-center historical cohort study included 39 term neonates with electrographic seizures who underwent treatment with midazolam (1st line) and lidocaine (2nd line). Therapeutic response was measured using continuous video-EEG monitoring. The EEG measurements included total seizure burden (minutes), maximum ictal fraction (minutes/hour), and EEG-background (normal/slightly abnormal vs. abnormal). Treatment response was considered good (seizure control with midazolam infusion), intermediate (need to add lidocaine to the control), or no response. Using clinical assessments supplemented by BSID-III and/or ASQ-3 at 2 to 9 years old age, neurodevelopment was classified as normal, borderline, or abnormal.

RESULTS

A good therapeutic response was obtained in 24 neonates, an intermediate response in 15, and no response in any of the neonates. Babies with good response showed lower values in maximum ictal fraction compared with those with intermediate response (95% CI: 5.85-8.64 vs. 9.14-19.14, P = 0.002). Neurodevelopment was considered normal in 24 children, borderline in five, and abnormal in other 10 children. Abnormal neurodevelopment was significantly associated with an abnormal EEG background, maximum ictal fraction >11 minutes, and total seizure burden >25 minutes (odds ratio 95% CI: 4.74-1708.52, P = 0.003; 1.72-200, P = 0.016; 1.72-142.86, P = 0.026, respectively) but not with the therapeutic response. Serious adverse effects were not recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggests that the midazolam/lidocaine association could potentially be efficacious in decreasing seizure burden in term neonates with acute seizures. These results would justify testing the midazolam/lidocaine combination as a first-line treatment for neonatal seizures in future clinical trials.

Bumetanide potentiates the anti-seizure and disease-modifying effects of midazolam in a noninvasive rat model of term birth asphyxia

Birth asphyxia and the resulting hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) are highly associated with perinatal and neonatal death, neonatal seizures, and an adverse later-life outcome. Currently used drugs, including phenobarbital and midazolam, have limited efficacy to suppress neonatal seizures. There is a medical need to develop new therapies that not only suppress neonatal seizures but also prevent later-life consequences. We have previously shown that the loop diuretic bumetanide does not potentiate the effects of phenobarbital in a rat model of birth asphyxia. Here we compared the effects of bumetanide (0.3 or 10 mg/kg i.p.), midazolam (1 mg/kg i.p.), and a combination of bumetanide and midazolam on neonatal seizures and later-life outcomes in this model. While bumetanide at either dose was ineffective when administered alone, the higher dose of bumetanide markedly potentiated midazolam's effect on neonatal seizures. Median bumetanide brain levels (0.47-0.53 µM) obtained with the higher dose were in the range known to inhibit the Na-K-Cl-cotransporter NKCC1 but it remains to be determined whether brain NKCC1 inhibition was underlying the potentiation of midazolam. When behavioral and cognitive alterations were examined over three months after asphyxia, treatment with the bumetanide/midazolam combination, but not with bumetanide or midazolam alone, prevented impairment of learning and memory. Furthermore, the combination prevented the loss of neurons in the dentate hilus and aberrant mossy fiber sprouting in the CA3a area of the hippocampus. The molecular mechanisms that explain that bumetanide potentiates midazolam but not phenobarbital in the rat model of birth asphyxia remain to be determined.

Early Discontinuation of Phenobarbital After Acute Symptomatic Neonatal Seizures in the Term Newborn

Acute symptomatic seizures in the term newborn are often seen after perinatal brain injury. Common etiologies include hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, metabolic derangements, and intracranial infections. Neonatal seizures are often treated with phenobarbital, which may cause sedation and may have significant long-term effects on brain development. Recent literature has suggested that phenobarbital may be safely discontinued in some patients before discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. Optimizing a strategy for selective early phenobarbital discontinuation would be of great value. In this study, we present a unified framework for phenobarbital discontinuation after resolution of acute symptomatic seizures in the setting of brain injury of the newborn.

Postnatal phenobarbital for the prevention of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) is a major complication of preterm birth. Large haemorrhages are associated with a high risk of disability and hydrocephalus. Instability of blood pressure and cerebral blood in the newborn flow are postulated as causative factors. Another mechanism may involve reperfusion damage from oxygen free radicals. It has been suggested that phenobarbital stabilises blood pressure and may protect against free radicals. This is an update of a review first published in 2001 and updated in 2007 and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of the postnatal administration of phenobarbital in preterm infants at risk of developing IVH compared to control (i.e. no intervention or placebo).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, CINAHL and clinical trial registries in January 2022. A new, more sensitive search strategy was developed, and searches were conducted without date limits.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs in which phenobarbital was given within the first 24 hours of life to preterm infants identified as being at risk of IVH because of gestational age below 34 weeks, birth weight below 1500 g or respiratory failure. Phenobarbital was compared to no intervention or placebo. We excluded infants with serious congenital malformations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all grades of IVH and severe IVH (i.e. grade III and IV); secondary outcomes were ventricular dilation or hydrocephalus, hypotension, pneumothorax, hypercapnia, acidosis, mechanical ventilation, neurodevelopmental impairment and death. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs (792 infants). The evidence suggests that phenobarbital results in little to no difference in the incidence of IVH of any grade compared with control (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.19; risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.07; I² for RD = 65%; 10 RCTs, 792 participants; low certainty evidence) and in severe IVH (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.21; 10 RCTs, 792 participants; low certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital on posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilation or hydrocephalus (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.26; 4 RCTs, 271 participants; very low certainty evidence), mild neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.17; 1RCT, 101 participants; very low certainty evidence), and severe neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.82; 2 RCTs, 153 participants; very low certainty evidence). Phenobarbital may result in little to no difference in death before discharge (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.21; 9 RCTs, 740 participants; low certainty evidence) and mortality during study period (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33; 10 RCTs, 792 participants; low certainty evidence) compared with control. We identified no ongoing trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that phenobarbital results in little to no difference in the incidence of IVH (any grade or severe) compared with control (i.e. no intervention or placebo). The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of phenobarbital on ventricular dilation or hydrocephalus and on neurodevelopmental impairment. The evidence suggests that phenobarbital results in little to no difference in death before discharge and all deaths during the study period compared with control. Since 1993, no randomised studies have been published on phenobarbital for the prevention of IVH in preterm infants, and no trials are ongoing. The effects of postnatal phenobarbital might be assessed in infants with both neonatal seizures and IVH, in both randomised and observational studies. The assessment of benefits and harms should include long-term outcomes.

Brain-Oriented Strategies for Neuroprotection of Asphyxiated Newborns in the First Hours of Life

Perinatal asphyxia represents the first cause of severe neurological disabilities and the second cause of neonatal death in term-born babies. Currently, no treatment can prevent immediate cell death from necrosis, but some therapeutic interventions, such as therapeutic hypothermia (TH), can reduce delayed cell death from apoptosis. TH significantly improves the combined outcome of mortality or major neurodevelopmental disability, but the number of patients to be treated is 7 to get 1 child with no adverse neurological outcome. The aim of this educational review is to analyze the other care strategies to be implemented to improve the neurological outcome of children with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Hypocapnia, hypoglycemia, pain control, and functional brain monitoring are recognized as appropriate approaches to improve outcome in critically ill infants with HIE. Pharmacologic neuroprotective adjuncts are currently under investigation. New drugs such as allopurinol and melatonin seem to provide positive effects although more randomized controlled trials are required to establish the effective therapeutic scheme. In the meantime, sustaining the respiratory, metabolic, and cardiovascular system during TH can be a valuable aid in managing and treating the patient with HIE in an optimal way.

Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective

Objectives

This article aims to critically review the literature on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU) from an Australian and New Zealand perspective and provide recommendations for clinicians.

Design and review methods

A taskforce of adult and paediatric neurologists, selected by the Epilepsy Society of Australia, reviewed the literature on cEEG for seizure detection in critically ill neonates, children, and adults in the ICU. The literature on routine EEG and cEEG for other indications was not reviewed. Following an evaluation of the evidence and discussion of controversial issues, consensus was reached, and a document that highlighted important clinical, practical, and economic considerations regarding cEEG in Australia and New Zealand was drafted.

Results

This review represents a summary of the literature and consensus opinion regarding the use of cEEG in the ICU for detection of seizures, highlighting gaps in evidence, practical problems with implementation, funding shortfalls, and areas for future research.

Conclusion

While cEEG detects electrographic seizures in a significant proportion of at-risk neonates, children, and adults in the ICU, conferring poorer neurological outcomes and guiding treatment in many settings, the health economic benefits of treating such seizures remain to be proven. Presently, cEEG in Australian and New Zealand ICUs is a largely unfunded clinical resource that is subsequently reserved for the highest-impact patient groups. Wider adoption of cEEG requires further research into impact on functional and health economic outcomes, education and training of the neurology and ICU teams involved, and securement of the necessary resources and funding to support the service.

Medical treatment in infants and young children with epilepsy: Off-label use of antiseizure medications. Survey Report of ILAE Task Force Medical Therapies in Children

OBJECTIVE

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) remain the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. These ASMs have mainly been tested in trials in adults with epilepsy, which subsequently led to market authorization (MA). For treatment of - especially young - children with epilepsy, several ASMs do not have a MA and guidelines are lacking, subsequently leading to "off-label" use of ASMs. Even though "off-label" ASM prescriptions for children could lead to more adverse events, it can be clinically appropriate and rational if the benefits outweigh the risks. This could be the case if "on-label" ASM, in mono- or polytherapy, fails to achieve adequate seizure control.

METHODS

The Medical Therapies Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission for Pediatrics performed a survey to study the current treatment practices in six classic, early life epilepsy scenarios. Our aim was not only to study first- and second-line treatment preferences but also to illustrate the use of "off-label" drugs in childhood epilepsies.

RESULTS

Our results reveal that several ASMs (e.g. topiramate, oxcarbazepine, benzodiazepines) are prescribed "off-label" in distinct scenarios of young children with epilepsy. In addition, recent scientific guidelines were not always adopted by several survey respondents, suggesting a potential knowledge gap.

SIGNIFICANCE

We report the relatively common use of "off-label" prescriptions that underlines the need for targeted and appropriately designed clinical trials, including younger patients, which will also result in the ability to generate evidence-based guidelines.

Comparison between Phenobarbitone and Levetiracetam as the initial anticonvulsant in preterm neonatal seizures - a pilot randomized control trial in developing country setup

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous Levetiracetam and Phenobarbitone in the treatment of seizures in preterm neonates. It was an open-labeled, parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, India. Total 48 preterm neonates (28-36⁺⁶ weeks) with clinical seizures were randomized to receive either Levetiracetam (LEV; 40 mg/kg, then 20 mg/kg) or Phenobarbitone (PB; 15 mg/kg, then 10 mg/kg) intravenously as first loading dose in ratio 1:1; second loading was given for persistent seizure. Efficacy was denoted by cessation of clinical seizures with first or second doses of the allotted antiepileptic, and remaining seizure-free for the next 24 h. The demographic characteristics of preterm neonates and seizure types were comparable between both groups. Clinical seizure was controlled in 19 (79%) neonates in LEV group and 17 (70%) neonates in PB group, RR 1.12 (95% CI: 0.80 to 1.55), p = 0.504. There was increased respiratory support in PB group 9 (38%) vs. 3 (13%) in LEV group, RR 3.0 (95% CI: 0.92 to 9.74), p = 0.06.  Conclusion: Levetiracetam and Phenobarbitone were equally efficacious for clinical neonatal seizure control, but increased respiratory support was found with Phenobarbitone use. What is Known: • Preterm neonates are at higher risk of neonatal seizure and Phenobarbitone is commonly used as the first line antiepileptic drugs in treating them. What is New: • Levetiracetam found equally efficacious as Phenobarbitone for cessation of clinical seizures in preterm neonates, with less adverse effect.

Levetiracetam versus Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although phenobarbital (PB) is commonly used as a first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for neonatal seizures, in 2015 we chose to replace it with levetiracetam (LEV), a third-generation ASM. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of LEV and PB as first-line ASM, considering the years before and after modifying our treatment protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 108 neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed seizures treated with first-line LEV or PB in 2012 to 2020.

RESULTS

First-line ASM was LEV in 33 (31%) and PB in 75 (69%) neonates. The etiology included acute symptomatic seizures in 69% of cases (30% hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, 32% structural vascular, 6% infectious, otherwise metabolic) and neonatal epilepsy in 22% (5% structural due to brain malformation, 17% genetic). Forty-two of 108 (39%) neonates reached seizure freedom following first-line therapy. Treatment response did not vary by first-line ASM among all neonates, those with acute symptomatic seizures, or those with neonatal-onset epilepsy. Treatment response was lowest for neonates with a higher seizure frequency, particularly for those with status epilepticus versus rare seizures (P < 0.001), irrespective of gestational age, etiology, or EEG findings. Adverse events were noted in 22 neonates treated with PB and in only one treated with LEV (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a potential noninferiority and a more acceptable safety profile for LEV, which may thus be a reasonable option as first-line ASM for neonatal seizures in place of PB. Treatment should be initiated as early as possible since higher seizure frequencies predispose to less favorable responses.

Improving child health through Big Data and data science

Child health is defined by a complex, dynamic network of genetic, cultural, nutritional, infectious, and environmental determinants at distinct, developmentally determined epochs from preconception to adolescence. This network shapes the future of children, susceptibilities to adult diseases, and individual child health outcomes. Evolution selects characteristics during fetal life, infancy, childhood, and adolescence that adapt to predictable and unpredictable exposures/stresses by creating alternative developmental phenotype trajectories. While child health has improved in the United States and globally over the past 30 years, continued improvement requires access to data that fully represent the complexity of these interactions and to new analytic methods. Big Data and innovative data science methods provide tools to integrate multiple data dimensions for description of best clinical, predictive, and preventive practices, for reducing racial disparities in child health outcomes, for inclusion of patient and family input in medical assessments, and for defining individual disease risk, mechanisms, and therapies. However, leveraging these resources will require new strategies that intentionally address institutional, ethical, regulatory, cultural, technical, and systemic barriers as well as developing partnerships with children and families from diverse backgrounds that acknowledge historical sources of mistrust. We highlight existing pediatric Big Data initiatives and identify areas of future research. IMPACT: Big Data and data science can improve child health. This review highlights the importance for child health of child-specific and life course-based Big Data and data science strategies. This review provides recommendations for future pediatric-specific Big Data and data science research.

A Comparative Study of Levetiracetam and Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures as a First Line Treatment

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the use of intravenous levetiracetam as the first-line treatment of neonatal seizures compared with phenobarbital.

Methods

The study was conducted on 104 neonates (0-28 days) with clinical seizures after inclusion criteria. They were assigned in equal ratio into 2 groups; 1 included neonates who received phenobarbitone, and the other included neonates who received levetiracetam. Neonates were loaded with 20 mg/kg of intravenous drug-A (phenobarbitone) or drug-B (levetiracetam). In persistent seizures, a second loading dose of the same drug was given. Crossover to other drugs occurred if seizures persisted after the second dose of the same drug. The proportion of neonates who achieved cessation of seizures following the first or second loading dose of either drug-A or drug-B (PB or LEV) was the main outcome measure provided that they remained free of seizure for the following 24 hours.

Results

After 1 or 2 doses of Levetiracatam or Phenobarbitone, clinical seizures stopped (and remained seizure-free for 24 hours) in 41 (78.84%) and 34 (65.38%) patients, respectively (P = .01). Neonates in the LEV group showed better seizure control than neonates in the PB group (RR = 0.57; 95% CI (0.17, 0.80). We did not report any adverse drug reactions in the LEV group. However, 12 (23.07%) neonates developed adverse drug reactions in the PB Group.

Conclusion

Levetiracetam is considered an effective and safe drug as a first-line AED in neonatal seizures.

Ganaxolone versus Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizure Management

OBJECTIVE

Seizures are more common in the neonatal period than at any other stage of life. Phenobarbital is the first-line treatment for neonatal seizures and is at best effective in approximately 50% of babies, but may contribute to neuronal injury. Here, we assessed the efficacy of phenobarbital versus the synthetic neurosteroid, ganaxolone, to moderate seizure activity and neuropathology in neonatal lambs exposed to perinatal asphyxia.

METHODS

Asphyxia was induced via umbilical cord occlusion in term lambs at birth. Lambs were treated with ganaxolone (5mg/kg/bolus then 5mg/kg/day for 2 days) or phenobarbital (20mg/kg/bolus then 5mg/kg/day for 2 days) at 6 hours. Abnormal brain activity was classified as stereotypic evolving (SE) seizures, epileptiform discharges (EDs), and epileptiform transients (ETs) using continuous amplitude-integrated electroencephalographic recordings. At 48 hours, lambs were euthanized for brain pathology.

RESULTS

Asphyxia caused abnormal brain activity, including SE seizures that peaked at 18 to 20 hours, EDs, and ETs, and induced neuronal degeneration and neuroinflammation. Ganaxolone treatment was associated with an 86.4% reduction in the number of seizures compared to the asphyxia group. The total seizure duration in the asphyxia+ganaxolone group was less than the untreated asphyxia group. There was no difference in the number of SE seizures between the asphyxia and asphyxia+phenobarbital groups or duration of SE seizures. Ganaxolone treatment, but not phenobarbital, reduced neuronal degeneration within hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions, and cortical neurons, and ganaxolone reduced neuroinflammation within the thalamus.

INTERPRETATION

Ganaxolone provided better seizure control than phenobarbital in this perinatal asphyxia model and was neuroprotective for the newborn brain, affording a new therapeutic opportunity for treatment of neonatal seizures. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:1066-1079.

Lacosamide decreases neonatal seizures without increasing apoptosis

OBJECTIVE

Many seizing neonates fail to respond to first-line anticonvulsant medications. Phenobarbital, an allosteric modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A ) receptors, has low efficacy in treating neonatal seizures and causes neuronal apoptosis. Nonetheless, it is one of the most used anticonvulsants in this age group. In neonatal mice, phenobarbital's poor effectiveness is due in part to high intraneuronal chloride concentration, which causes GABA to exert depolarizing actions. Therefore, another approach to treat neonatal seizures could be to use anticonvulsants that do not rely on GABAergic modulation. We evaluated whether lacosamide decreases seizures in neonatal mice and whether it increases apoptosis in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

In vitro, we measured the effect of different lacosamide concentrations on seizure-like activity induced by the pro-convulsant drug 4-aminopyridine in neocortical brain slices (layer IV/V) from neonatal (postnatal day 8-11) and adult (1-1.6 months old) C57BL/6J mice. In vivo, we recorded the effect of different lacosamide concentrations on neonatal behavioral seizures induced by kainic acid. We studied neocortical apoptosis in vitro and in vivo, measuring terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP nick-end labeling signal and cleaved-caspase 3.

RESULTS

Lacosamide reduced epileptiform activity in neocortical brain slices of neonates and adults in a concentration-dependent manner. In vivo, lacosamide reduced the duration and number of behavioral seizures. Lacosamide did not increase total or neuronal apoptosis in the neocortex in vitro or in vivo.

SIGNIFICANCE

Lacosamide reduces neocortical seizure-like activity in neonatal mice in vitro and in vivo without an acute increase in apoptosis. Our results support the use of lacosamide to treat neonatal seizures, with the advantage of not increasing apoptosis acutely.

Neonatal Arterial Ischaemic Stroke: Advances in Pathologic Neural Death, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis

Neonatal arterial ischaemic stroke (NAIS) is caused by focal arterial occlusion and often leads to severe neurological sequelae. Neural deaths after NAIS mainly include necrosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis. These neural deaths are mainly caused by upstream stimulations, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and death receptor pathways. The current clinical approaches to managing NAIS mainly focus on supportive treatments, including seizure control and anticoagulation. In recent years, research on the pathology, early diagnosis, and potential therapeutic targets of NAIS has progressed. In this review, we summarise the latest progress of research on the pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of NAIS and highlight newly potential diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Management and prognosis of pediatric status epilepticus

Background

Pediatric status epilepticus is a neurological emergency with the potential for severe developmental and neurological consequences. Prompt diagnosis and management are necessary.

Objectives

To outline the existing best available evidence for managing pediatric and neonatal status epilepticus, in the light of emerging randomized controlled studies. We also focus on short and long-term prognoses.

Materials and methods

This is a systematic overview of the existing literature.

Results

Status epilepticus, its treatment, and prognosis are usually based on the continuation of seizure activity at 5 and 30 min. Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus further complicates management and requires continuous EEG monitoring with regular reassessment and adjustment of therapy. Benzodiazepines have been accepted as the first line of treatment on the basis of reasonable evidence. Emerging randomized controlled trials demonstrate equal efficacy for parenterally administered phenytoin, levetiracetam, and valproic acid as second-line agents. Beyond this, the evidence for third-line options is sparse. However, encouraging evidence for midazolam and ketamine exists with further data required for immunological, dietary, and surgical interventions.

Conclusion

Our overview of the management of pediatric and neonatal status epilepticus based on available evidence emphasizes the need for evidence-based guidelines to manage status epilepticus that fails to respond to second-line treatment.

Analysis of the risk factors of post-operative seizure in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus undergoing endoscopic third ventriculostomy

OBJECTIVE

The cause and mechanism of epilepsy after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) have still remained elusive. This single-center study aimed to explore and analyze the risk factors of post-operative seizure in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus undergoing ETV.

METHODS

Data of pediatric patients with hydrocephalus who were treated with ETV from October 1, 2015, to November 31, 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Basic demographic characteristics, etiology of hydrocephalus, surgical details, and laboratory measurements were collected. An early postoperative seizure was defined as the occurrence of at least one clinical seizure within 24 h of ETV.

RESULTS

A total of 50 participants were included in the study, of whom 5 (10.00%) cases were in postoperative epilepsy group and 45 (90.00%) cases were in non-epilepsy group. Epilepsy patients were younger than those without epilepsy, while no statistically significant difference was found (P = 0.0836). In the age subgroup, children with epilepsy were younger than 2 years old. All patients with epilepsy received Ringer's solution intraoperatively. The mean postoperative serum calcium and potassium concentrations were significantly lower in patients with epilepsy than in those without epilepsy (P_calcium = 0.0429; P_potassium = 0.0250). Moreover, a faster decrease of serum potassium and calcium levels was found in children with epilepsy compared with those without epilepsy after ETV.

CONCLUSION

The decrease of serum calcium and potassium levels, younger age, and using Ringer's solution as irrigation fluid were risk factors for epilepsy after ETV.

Neonatal seizures: stepping outside the comfort zone

Seizures are the most common neurological disorders in newborns. Managing neonatal seizures is challenging, especially for neurologists who are not neonatal specialists. Acute brain injury during ischemic insult is a key component of seizure occurrence, while genetic and metabolic disorders play less prevalent but more severe roles. The diagnosis of neonatal seizure is ambiguous, as the subjective differentiation between seizure and nonepileptic events is difficult; therefore, electrographic recording is the gold standard for diagnosis. The detection of electrographic seizures by neonatologists is currently facilitated by amplitude-integrated electroencephalography availability in many neonatal intensive care units. Although it is less sensitive than conventional electroencephalography, it is better to record all risky neonates to filter the abnormal events as early as possible to enable the initiation of dedicated therapy at proper dose and time and facilitate the initial response to antiepileptic drugs. This, in turn, helps maintain the balance between unnecessary drug use and their neurotoxic effects. Moreover, the early treatment of electrographic seizures plays a vital role in the suppression of subsequent abnormal brain electricity (status epilepticus) and shortening the hospital stay. An explicit understanding of seizure etiology and pathophysiology should direct attention to the proper prescription of short- and long-term antiepileptic medications to solve the challenging issue of whether neonatal seizures progress to postneonatal epilepsy and long-term cognitive deficits. This review addresses recent updates in different aspects of neonatal seizures, particularly electrographic discharge, including their definition, etiology, classification, diagnosis, management, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Neonatal seizures—diagnostic options and treatment recommendations

Seizures in neonates should prompt rapid evaluation to verify the diagnosis, determine etiology, and initiate appropriate treatment. Neonatal seizure diagnosis requires EEG confirmation and clinical observation alone is insufficient. Although most neonatal seizures are related to acute brain injury, some neonates present early-onset structural or metabolic/genetic epilepsy. Video-EEG monitoring, the gold standard for neonatal seizure detection and quantification, is resource-intensive and often unavailable, with amplitude-integrated EEG offering a reasonable alternative in guiding treatment. Whereas new-generation antiseizure medication (ASM), such as levetiracetam, appear promising, particularly in terms of tolerability, older-generation ASM, such as phenobarbital and phenytoin, are yet to be replaced. Acute treatment should aim at stopping both electroclinical and electrographic-only seizures. In neonates with acute provoked seizures, ASM should be discontinued without tapering after 72 h of seizure freedom and before hospital discharge.

Neonatal seizures treatment based on conventional multichannel EEG monitoring: an overview of therapeutic options

INTRODUCTION

Seizures are the main neurological emergency during the neonatal period and are mostly acute and focal. The prognosis mainly depends on the underlying etiology. Conventional multichannel video-electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosis, but treatment remains a challenge.

AREAS COVERED

: This review, based on PubMed search over the last 4 decades, focuses on the current treatment options for neonatal seizures based on cEEG monitoring. There is still no consensus on seizure therapy, owing to poor scientific evidence. Traditionally, the first-line treatments are phenobarbital and phenytoin, followed by midazolam and lidocaine, but their efficacy is limited. Therefore, current evidence strongly suggests the use of alternative antiseizure medications. Randomized controlled trials of new drugs are ongoing.

EXPERT OPINION

: Therapy for neonatal seizures should be prompt and tailored, based on semeiology, mirror of the underlying cause, and cEEG features. Further research should focus on antiseizure medications that directly act on the etiopathogenetic mechanism responsible for seizures and are therefore more effective in seizure control.

Levetiracetam or Phenobarbitone as a First-Line Anticonvulsant in Asphyxiated Term Newborns? An Open-Label, Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pragmatic Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neonatal seizures are one of the most challenging problems for experts across the globe. Although there is no consensus on the "ideal" treatment of neonatal seizures, phenobarbitone has been the drug of choice for decades. Unfortunately, although extensively studied in adults and children, levetiracetam lacks rigorous evaluation in the neonatal population, despite its frequent use as an off-label drug. The objective of this open-label, randomized, active-control, single-center, pragmatic trial was to compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam with phenobarbitone for term asphyxiated infants as a first-line drug.

METHODS

The participants included in this study were inborn term asphyxiated infants with seizures in the first 48 hours of life. Infants satisfying the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive levetiracetam (20 mg/kg) or phenobarbitone (20 mg/kg). Clinical seizure control was noted. Infants who failed to respond to the primary drug were given the other group drug.

RESULTS

Of 103 eligible infants, 82 were randomly assigned (44 levetiracetam group, 38 phenobarbitone group). Clinical seizure control with the primary drug and maintenance of the same for 24 hours was observed in 29 infants (65.9%) in the levetiracetam group and 13 infants (34.2%) in the phenobarbitone group (P < .05, relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.84). Of the infants in the phenobarbitone group who did not respond to the primary drug, 57.8% were controlled after adding levetiracetam.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam can be used with effectiveness as a first- and second-line drug in asphyxiated term infants. A more extensive study on pharmacokinetics and optimal regimen is required.

Efficacy of Levetiracetam and Phenobarbital as First-Line Treatment for Neonatal Seizures

High neonatal seizure burden is associated with worsened neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared the efficacy of initial treatment with levetiracetam vs phenobarbital for maintaining low seizure burden in a retrospective cohort of 25 neonates monitored with video electroencephalography (EEG). Video EEG tracing were reviewed and paired with medication bolus times to determine seizure burden after treatment. Initial cumulative dose of phenobarbital was 20 mg/kg in all but 1 case; initial cumulative dose of levetiracetam ranged from 50 to 100 mg/kg. Eleven of 17 (65%) patients sustained seizure burden <10% following initial treatment with levetiracetam, compared with 5 of 8 (63%) with phenobarbital. Thirteen (76%) patients treated with levetiracetam had sustained seizure burden <20% compared with 6 (75%) treated with phenobarbital. The phenobarbital group showed a larger absolute reduction in average seizure burden in the hour before and after treatment (-24.3  vs -14.2 minutes/h). Six of 17 (35%) patients treated with levetiracetam remained seizure free after initial treatment, compared with 2 of 8 (25%) patients treated with phenobarbital. Initial treatment with levetiracetam was associated with shorter average time to seizure freedom (15 vs 21 hours). None of these results were statistically significant. Cumulative doses of levetiracetam 100 mg/kg were well tolerated and associated with substantial decrease in seizure burden in several cases. Levetiracetam remains a promising first-line treatment for neonatal seizures; additional randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of high-dose levetiracetam on seizure burden and long-term outcomes are warranted.

Neonatal Seizure Management: Is the Timing of Treatment Critical?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the time to treatment of the first electrographic seizure on subsequent seizure burden and describe overall seizure management in a large neonatal cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Newborns (36-44 weeks of gestation) requiring electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring recruited to 2 multicenter European studies were included. Infants who received antiseizure medication exclusively after electrographic seizure onset were grouped based on the time to treatment of the first seizure: antiseizure medication within 1 hour, between 1 and 2 hours, and after 2 hours. Outcomes measured were seizure burden, maximum seizure burden, status epilepticus, number of seizures, and antiseizure medication dose over the first 24 hours after seizure onset.

RESULTS

Out of 472 newborns recruited, 154 (32.6%) had confirmed electrographic seizures. Sixty-nine infants received antiseizure medication exclusively after the onset of electrographic seizure, including 21 infants within 1 hour of seizure onset, 15 between 1 and 2 hours after seizure onset, and 33 at >2 hours after seizure onset. Significantly lower seizure burden and fewer seizures were noted in the infants treated with antiseizure medication within 1 hour of seizure onset (P = .029 and .035, respectively). Overall, 258 of 472 infants (54.7%) received antiseizure medication during the study period, of whom 40 without electrographic seizures received treatment exclusively during EEG monitoring and 11 with electrographic seizures received no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of neonatal seizures may be time-critical, but more research is needed to confirm this. Improvements in neonatal seizure diagnosis and treatment are also needed.

Retrospective Evaluation of First-line Levetiracetam use for Neonatal Seizures after Congenital Heart Defect repair with or without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

Levetiracetam (LEV) efficacy for neonatal seizures is debated. We evaluated LEV as a first line anti-seizure medicine (ASM) in neonates following neonatal congenital heart defect (CHD) repair who did not require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vs neonates who required ECMO.

METHODS

A single center retrospective review of neonates with CHD from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Neonates were included if seizures were present on continuous EEG after CHD repair either on or off ECMO, and they received LEV as a first line ASM. Primary outcomes were seizure resolution with LEV, adverse events and response to subsequent ASM.

RESULTS

Eighteen total neonates were evaluated, 10 with seizures post-CHD repair who did not require ECMO and 8 who required ECMO. In the non-ECMO cohort, nine of ten were successfully treated with LEV monotherapy with no adverse events. In comparison, the eight neonates who required ECMO had a higher initial seizure burden (1.6% vs 17%, p=0.003), were more likely to have injury on neuroimaging (12.5 vs 75%, p= 0.04), and all neonates required multiple ASMs. Seizure burden did not decrease with LEV, but significantly decreased with phenobarbital and fosphenytoin (14.4% and 10.5%, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with CHD and seizures on and off ECMO demonstrated divergent seizure characteristics including seizure burden and response to LEV. LEV may reduce neonatal seizure burden after uncomplicated CHD repair. However, in neonates requiring ECMO, multiple ASMs were required. A prospective evaluation of ASM efficacy and safety in this high-risk population is urgently needed.

A Review of the Prevalence, Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Pediatric Epilepsies in India

Pediatric seizures are one of the most common neurological manifestations seen in pediatrics. Unravelling the etiology, timely and appropriate investigations followed by suitable therapies are essential for improving quality of life. During the pandemic, focused group discussions were conducted among 50 pediatric neurologists across five cities in India to gather insights on treatment practices in pediatric epilepsy and to optimize therapeutic strategies and alternative approaches for rational use of antiepileptic medications. These discussions were mainly aimed at reviewing current literature on prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and management of epilepsy in children and subsequently rationalizing diagnostic and treatment approaches in routine clinical practice. Epileptic encephalopathies comprise of childhood epilepsy with progressive cerebral dysfunction. Genomics plays a vital role in identifying the underlying genetic associations, empowering precision therapy. Currently, the ketogenic diet has become a well-recognized modality for reducing severity of seizures. To overcome the high incidence of adverse effects due to older antiepileptic drugs, newer drugs are being developed to improve ease of use, diminish drug interactions, decrease adverse effects, and identify drugs with unique mechanisms of action. Common lacunae in practice include information gaps, educating parents, or caregivers about rational drug use and ensuring compliance to antiepileptic medications. This article discussed the consensus clinical viewpoint of expert clinicians, as well as insights on optimized treatment of pediatric epilepsies in both infancy and childhood. It also discusses aspects, like reducing drug burden, emerging therapies in the identification of the genetic basis of epilepsies, and targeted therapy alternatives, for pediatric populations in the Indian scenario.

Characteristics of Neonates with Cardiopulmonary Disease Who Experience Seizures: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare key seizure and outcome characteristics between neonates with and without cardiopulmonary disease.

STUDY DESIGN

The Neonatal Seizure Registry is a multicenter, prospectively acquired cohort of neonates with clinical or electroencephalographic (EEG)-confirmed seizures. Cardiopulmonary disease was defined as congenital heart disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and exposure to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We assessed continuous EEG monitoring strategy, seizure characteristics, seizure management, and outcomes for neonates with and without cardiopulmonary disease.

RESULTS

We evaluated 83 neonates with cardiopulmonary disease and 271 neonates without cardiopulmonary disease. Neonates with cardiopulmonary disease were more likely to have EEG-only seizures (40% vs 21%, P < .001) and experience their first seizure later than those without cardiopulmonary disease (174 vs 21 hours of age, P < .001), but they had similar seizure exposure (many-recurrent electrographic seizures 39% vs 43%, P = .27). Phenobarbital was the primary initial antiseizure medication for both groups (90%), and both groups had similarly high rates of incomplete response to initial antiseizure medication administration (66% vs 68%, P = .75). Neonates with cardiopulmonary disease were discharged from the hospital later (hazard ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.25-0.45, P < .001), although rates of in-hospital mortality were similar between the groups (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.66-1.94, P = .64).

CONCLUSION

Neonates with and without cardiopulmonary disease had a similarly high seizure exposure, but neonates with cardiopulmonary disease were more likely to experience EEG-only seizures and had seizure onset later in the clinical course. Phenobarbital was the most common seizure treatment, but seizures were often refractory to initial antiseizure medication. These data support guidelines recommending continuous EEG in neonates with cardiopulmonary disease and indicate a need for optimized therapeutic strategies.