1
|
Dewald F, Steger G, Fish I, Torre-Lage I, Hellriegel C, Milz E, Kolb-Bastigkeit A, Heger E, Fries M, Buess M, Marizy N, Michaelis B, Suárez I, Rubio Quintanares GH, Pirkl M, Aigner A, Oberste M, Hellmich M, Wong A, Orduz JC, Fätkenheuer G, Dötsch J, Kossow A, Moench EM, Quade G, Neumann U, Kaiser R, Schranz M, Klein F. SARS-CoV-2 Test-to-Stay in Daycare. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023064668. [PMID: 38596855 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-064668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Test-to-stay concepts apply serial testing of children in daycare after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 without use of quarantine. This study aims to assess the safety of a test-to-stay screening in daycare facilities. METHODS 714 daycare facilities and approximately 50 000 children ≤6 years in Cologne, Germany participated in a SARS-CoV-2 Pool-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening from March 2021 to April 2022. The screening initially comprised post-exposure quarantine and was adapted to a test-to-stay approach during its course. To assess safety of the test-to-stay approach, we explored potential changes in frequencies of infections among children after the adaptation to the test-to-stay approach by applying regression discontinuity in time (RDiT) analyses. To this end, PCR-test data were linked with routinely collected data on reported infections in children and analyzed using ordinary least squares regressions. RESULTS 219 885 Pool-PCRs and 352 305 Single-PCRs were performed. 6440 (2.93%) Pool-PCRs tested positive, and 17 208 infections in children were reported. We estimated that during a period of 30 weeks, the test-to-stay concept avoided between 7 and 20 days of quarantine per eligible daycare child. RDiT revealed a 26% reduction (Exp. Coef: 0.74, confidence interval 0.52-1.06) in infection frequency among children and indicated no significant increase attributable to the test-to-stay approach. This result was not sensitive to adjustments for 7-day incidence, season, SARS-CoV-2 variant, and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS Our analyses provide evidence that suggest safety of the test-to-stay approach compared with quarantine measures. This approach offers a promising option to avoid use of quarantine after exposure to respiratory pathogens in daycare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Dewald
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Public Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gertrud Steger
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
| | - Irina Fish
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
| | - Ivonne Torre-Lage
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
| | | | - Esther Milz
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
| | | | - Eva Heger
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
| | - Mira Fries
- Health department of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Isabelle Suárez
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne
| | | | - Martin Pirkl
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
| | - Annette Aigner
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Oberste
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne
| | - Anabelle Wong
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Gerd Fätkenheuer
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne
| | - Jörg Dötsch
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annelene Kossow
- Health department of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute for Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Gustav Quade
- MVZ Labor Dr. Quade and Kollegen GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Udo Neumann
- Youth Welfare Office of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rolf Kaiser
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Madlen Schranz
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Public Health, Berlin, Germany
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Klein
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zimmerman KO, Benjamin DK. Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic in K-12 Education. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023060352O. [PMID: 37394505 PMCID: PMC10312278 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-060352o] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel K. Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalu IC, Zimmerman KO, Goldman JL, Keener Mast D, Blakemore AM, Moorthy G, Boutzoukas AE, Campbell MM, Uthappa D, DeLaRosa J, Potts JM, Edwards LJ, Selvarangan R, Benjamin DK, Mann TK, Schuster JE. SARS-CoV-2 Screening Testing Programs for Safe In-person Learning in K-12 Schools. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:64-72. [PMID: 36412278 PMCID: PMC9969331 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piac119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening testing is a recommended mitigation strategy for schools, although few descriptions of program implementation are available. METHODS Kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) students and staff practicing universal masking during the delta and omicron variant waves from five schools in Durham, North Carolina and eight schools in Kansas City, Missouri participated; Durham's program was structured as a public health initiative facilitated by school staff, and Kansas City's as a research study facilitated by a research team. Tests included school-based rapid antigen or polymerase chain reaction testing, at-home rapid antigen testing, and off-site nucleic acid amplification testing. RESULTS We performed nearly 5700 screening tests on more than 1600 K-12 school students and staff members. The total cost for the Durham testing program in 5 public charter K-12 schools, each with 500-1000 students, was $246 587 and approximately 752 h per semester; cost per test was $70 and cost per positive result was $7076. The total cost for the Kansas City program in eight public K-12 schools was $292 591 and required approximately 537 h in personnel time for school-based testing; cost per test was $132 and cost per positive result was $4818. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were generally lower (0-16.16%) than rates in the community (2.7-36.47%) throughout all testing weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Voluntary screening testing programs in K-12 schools are costly and rarely detect asymptomatic positive persons, particularly in universally masked settings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04831866.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibukunoluwa C Kalu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kanecia O Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Dana Keener Mast
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Ashley M Blakemore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ganga Moorthy
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelique E Boutzoukas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa M Campbell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diya Uthappa
- Duke University School of Medicine, Doctor of Medicine Program, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse DeLaRosa
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Laura J Edwards
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rangaraj Selvarangan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel K Benjamin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- The ABC Science Collaborative, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tara K Mann
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer E Schuster
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
DeJonge PM, Pray IW, Gangnon R, McCoy K, Tomasallo C, Meiman J. School District Prevention Policies and Risk of COVID-19 Among In-Person K-12 Educators, Wisconsin, 2021. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:1791-1799. [PMID: 36383939 PMCID: PMC9670223 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.307095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives. To assess the rate of COVID-19 among in-person K-12 educators and the rate's association with various COVID-19 prevention policies in school districts. Methods. We linked actively working, in-person K-12 educators in Wisconsin to COVID-19 cases with onset from September 2 to November 24, 2021. A mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for pertinent person- and community-level confounders, compared the hazard rate of COVID-19 among educators working in districts with and without specific COVID-19 prevention policies. Results. In-person educators working in school districts that required masking for students and staff experienced 19% lower hazards of COVID-19 than did those in districts without any masking policy (hazard ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval = 0.72, 0.92). Reduced COVID-19 hazards were consistent and remained statistically significant when educators were stratified by elementary, middle, and high school environments. Conclusions. In Wisconsin's K-12 school districts, during the fall 2021 academic semester, a policy that required both students and staff to mask was associated with significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 among in-person educators across all grade levels. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(12):1791-1799. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307095).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M DeJonge
- Peter DeJonge is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison. Ian W. Pray, Katherine McCoy, Carrie Tomasallo, and Jonathan Meiman are with the Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Ronald Gangnon is with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Ian W Pray
- Peter DeJonge is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison. Ian W. Pray, Katherine McCoy, Carrie Tomasallo, and Jonathan Meiman are with the Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Ronald Gangnon is with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Ronald Gangnon
- Peter DeJonge is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison. Ian W. Pray, Katherine McCoy, Carrie Tomasallo, and Jonathan Meiman are with the Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Ronald Gangnon is with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Katherine McCoy
- Peter DeJonge is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison. Ian W. Pray, Katherine McCoy, Carrie Tomasallo, and Jonathan Meiman are with the Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Ronald Gangnon is with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Carrie Tomasallo
- Peter DeJonge is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison. Ian W. Pray, Katherine McCoy, Carrie Tomasallo, and Jonathan Meiman are with the Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Ronald Gangnon is with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Jonathan Meiman
- Peter DeJonge is with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison. Ian W. Pray, Katherine McCoy, Carrie Tomasallo, and Jonathan Meiman are with the Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Ronald Gangnon is with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lammie SL, Ford L, Swanson M, Guinn AS, Kamitani E, van Zyl A, Rose CE, Marynak K, Shields J, Donovan CV, Holman EJ, Mark-Carew M, Welton M, Thomas ES, Neatherlin JC. Test-to-Stay Implementation in 4 Pre-K-12 School Districts. Pediatrics 2022; 150:e2022057362. [PMID: 35922896 PMCID: PMC10043738 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-057362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Globally, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected how children learn. We evaluated the impact of Test to Stay (TTS) on secondary and tertiary transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and potential impact on in-person learning in 4 school districts in the United States from September 13 to November 19, 2021. METHODS Implementation of TTS varied across school districts. Data on index cases, school-based close contacts, TTS participation, and testing results were obtained from 4 school districts in diverse geographic regions. Descriptive statistics, secondary and tertiary attack risk, and a theoretical estimate of impact on in-person learning were calculated. RESULTS Fifty-one schools in 4 school districts reported 374 coronavirus disease COVID-19 index cases and 2520 school-based close contacts eligible for TTS. The proportion participating in TTS ranged from 22% to 79%. By district, the secondary attack risk and tertiary attack risk among TTS participants ranged between 2.2% to 11.1% and 0% to 17.6%, respectively. Nine clusters were identified among secondary cases and 2 among tertiary cases. The theoretical maximum number of days of in-person learning saved by using TTS was 976 to 4650 days across jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS TTS preserves in-person learning. Decisions to participate in TTS may have been influenced by ease of access to testing, communication between schools and families, testing logistics, and school resources. Tertiary attack risk determination became more complicated when numbers of close contacts increased. Minimizing exposure through continued layered prevention strategies is imperative. To ensure adequate resources for TTS, community transmission levels should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Lammie
- Epidemic Intelligence Service
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Contributed equally as co-first authors
| | - Laura Ford
- Epidemic Intelligence Service
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- Contributed equally as co-first authors
| | - Megan Swanson
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Angie S Guinn
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emiko Kamitani
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - André van Zyl
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- 4ES Corporation, San Antonio Texas
| | - Charles E Rose
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kristy Marynak
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jamila Shields
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Catherine V Donovan
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emily J Holman
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Miguella Mark-Carew
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- G2S Corporation, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Michael Welton
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- G2S Corporation, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Ebony S Thomas
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - John C Neatherlin
- COVID-19 Emergency Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Myers V, Saban M, Wilf-Miron R. Covid-19 in children aged 5-11: Examining the issues surrounding vaccination and public health policy. Paediatr Respir Rev 2022; 43:85-90. [PMID: 35568661 PMCID: PMC9023081 DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children under 12 are now the largest unvaccinated group. Following FDA approval, vaccination of 5-11 year olds is now being encouraged in some countries. We present data on child COVID-related morbidity in Israel and discuss the complexities surrounding vaccinating children aged 5-11. METHODS Data were obtained from Israel's open COVID database regarding new confirmed daily COVID-19 cases, severe hospitalized cases and deaths by age group in Israel from February 2020-November 2021, as well as vaccination rate and adverse events following vaccination. RESULTS In 5-11 year olds, there were 460 hospitalizations, including 72 moderate to critical (0.007% population rate), with 3 deaths (0.0003% population rate). Children (0-19) made up the largest proportion (41%) of cases, but comprised just <0.1% of deaths, and <1% of severe cases. Post-vaccine myocarditis was much lower than severe COVID risk except in boys aged 12-19 where it was equivalent to the risk of mechanical ventilation due to COVID in boys aged 10-19 (12 per 100,000). High numbers of children were quarantined. CONCLUSIONS COVID risk is minimal for most children though rare complications do occur. Israeli and US pediatric associations have recommended vaccinating children, particularly in high-incidence scenarios where risk-benefit balance is more clear-cut. However only a quarter of eligible parents have vaccinated their children. Parents may consider health grounds but also restrictions on children, population vaccination levels, waning immunity and new variants, and should be provided with clear information to help them make an informed decision. Policymakers should reevaluate the need for isolations, testing and mask-wearing in school age children, which are detrimental to their wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Myers
- Gertner Institute of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
| | - Mor Saban
- Gertner Institute of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Rachel Wilf-Miron
- Gertner Institute of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel,School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harris-McCoy K, Lee VC, Munna C, Kim AA. Evaluation of a Test to Stay Strategy in Transitional Kindergarten Through Grade 12 Schools - Los Angeles County, California, August 16-October 31, 2021. MMWR. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT 2021; 70:1773-1777. [PMID: 34968371 PMCID: PMC8736271 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm705152e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Veronica C Lee
- Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, California
| | - Cortney Munna
- Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, California
| | - Andrea A Kim
- Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, California
| |
Collapse
|