High-power, Short-duration Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of AF

Skin sympathetic nerve activity in different ablation settings for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Modifying the autonomic system after catheter ablation may prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evaluation of skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) is a noninvasive method for the assessment of sympathetic activity. However, there are few studies on the effects of different energy settings on SKNA.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes in SKNA in different energy settings and their relationship to AF ablation outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were enrolled. Forty-three patients received AF ablation with the conventional (ConV) energy setting (low power for long duration), and 29 patients using a high-power, short-duration (HPSD) strategy. The SKNA was acquired from the right arm 1 day before and after the radiofrequency ablation. We analyzed the SKNA and ablation outcomes in the different energy settings.

RESULTS

Both groups had a similar baseline average SKNA (aSKNA). We found that the median aSKNA increased significantly from 446.82 μV to 805.93 μV (p = 0.003) in the ConV group but not in the HPSD group. In the ConV group, patients without AF recurrence had higher aSKNA values. However, the 1-year AF recurrence rate remained similar between both groups (35 % vs. 28 %, p = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

The post-ablation aSKNA levels increased significantly in the ConV group but did not change significantly in the HPSD group, which may reflect different neuromodulatory effects. However, the one-year AF recurrence rates were similar for both groups. These results demonstrate that the HPSD strategy has durable lesion creation but less lesion depth, which may reduce collateral damage.

Efficacy and safety of high-power short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has emerged as an alternative to conventional standard-power long-duration (SPLD) ablation. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of HPSD versus SPLD for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were performed through August 2023. We used RevMan V. 5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

PROSPERO ID

CRD42023471797.

RESULTS

We included six RCTs with a total of 694 patients. HPSD was significantly associated with a decreased total procedure time (MD: -22.88 with 95% CI [-36.13, -9.63], P = 0.0007), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) time (MD: -19.73 with 95% CI [-23.93, -15.53], P < 0.00001), radiofrequency time (MD: -10.53 with 95% CI [-12.87, -8.19], P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference between HPSD and SPLD ablation with respect to the fluoroscopy time (MD: -0.69 with 95% CI [-2.00, 0.62], P = 0.30), the incidence of esophageal lesions (RR: 1.15 with 95% CI [0.43, 3.07], P = 0.77), and the incidence of first pass isolation (RR: 0.98 with 95% CI [0.88, 1.08], P = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

HPSD ablation was significantly associated with decreased total procedure time, PVI time, and radiofrequency time compared with SPLD ablation. On the contrary, SPLD ablation was significantly associated with low maximum temperature.

Esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5-40%, cryoballoon 3-25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications.

High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolations (PVI) are being performed using a high-power, short-duration (HPSD) strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of an HPSD versus low-power, long-duration (LPLD) approach to PVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Patients were grouped according to a HPSD (≥40 W) or LPLD (≤35 W) strategy. The primary endpoint was the 1-year recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia lasting ≥30 s, detected using three 14-day ambulatory continuous ECG monitoring. Procedural and safety endpoints were also evaluated. The primary analysis were regression models incorporating propensity scores yielding adjusted relative risk (RRa ) and mean difference (MDa ) estimates.

RESULTS

Of the 398 patients included in the AWARE Trial, 173 (43%) underwent HPSD and 225 (57%) LPLD ablation. The distribution of power was 50 W in 75%, 45 W in 20%, and 40 W in 5% in the HPSD group, and 35 W with 25 W on the posterior wall in the LPLD group. The primary outcome was not statistically significant at 30.1% versus 22.2% in HPSD and LPLD groups with RRa 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.55-1.10; p = .165). The secondary outcome of repeat catheter ablation was not statistically significant at 6.9% and 9.8% (RRa 1.59 [95% CI 0.77-3.30]; p = .208) respectively, nor was the incidence of any ECG documented AF during the blanking period: 1.7% versus 8.0% (RRa 3.95 [95% CI 1.00-15.61; p = .049) in the HPSD versus LPLD group respectively. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in the HPSD group (MDa 97.5 min [95% CI 84.8-110.4)]; p < .0001) with no difference in adjudicated serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

An HPSD strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedural times with similar efficacy in terms of clinical arrhythmia recurrence. Importantly, there was no signal for increased harm with a HPSD strategy.

Lower contact force predicts right pulmonary vein carina breakthrough after ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation using high-power short-duration

INTRODUCTION

Carina breakthrough (CB) at the right pulmonary vein (RPV) can occur after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) due to epicardial bridging or transient tissue edema. High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation may increase the incidence of RPV CB. Currently, the surrogate of ablation parameters to predict RPV CB is not well established. This study investigated predictors of RPV CB in patients undergoing ablation index (AI)-guided PVI with HPSD.

METHODS

The study included 62 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent AI-guided PVI using HPSD. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of RPV CB. Lesions adjacent to the RPV carina were assessed, and CB was confirmed through residual voltage, low voltage along the ablation lesions, and activation wavefront propagation.

RESULTS

Out of the 62 patients, 21 (33.87%) experienced RPV CB (Group 1), while 41 (66.13%) achieved first-pass RPV isolation (Group 2). Despite similar AI and HPSD, patients with RPV CB had lower contact force (CF) at lesions adjacent to the RPV carina. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified CF < 10.5 g as a predictor of RPV CB, with 75.7% sensitivity and 56.2% specificity (area under the curve: 0.714).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing AI-guided PVI with HPSD, lower CF adjacent to the carina was associated with a higher risk of RPV CB. These findings suggest that maintaining higher CF during ablation in this region may reduce the occurrence of RPV CB.

Very-high-power Short-duration Ablation versus Conventional Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of very-high-power short-duration (VHPSD) ablation (70-90 W/4-7 s) with conventional ablation (30-40 W/>20 s, 50 W/7-11 s) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with AF. A total of 13 studies were included in this analysis (1,527 patients). AF recurrence occurred in 14% (95% CI [11-18%]) of the VHPSD group. VHPSD was associated with lower AF recurrence (OR 0.65; 95% CI [0.48-0.89]; p=0.006) compared with the conventional ablation group. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI had a similar rate of AF recurrence (16% versus 10%) compared with PVI alone. Procedure and ablation durations were significantly shorter in the VHPSD group with a mean differences of -14.4 minutes (p=0.017) and -14.1 minutes (p<0.001), respectively. Complications occurred in 6% (95% CI [3-9%]) of the VHPSD group, and the rate was similar between the two groups (OR 1.03; 95% CI [0.60-1.80]; p=0.498). VHPSD ablation resulted in less AF recurrence and a shorter procedure time. Additional ablation beyond PVI alone in VHPSD may not provide additional benefits.

Comparison of pulsed-field ablation versus very high power short duration-ablation for pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

The newly introduced nonthermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology to achieve fast pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with high acute success rates and good safety features. However, previous studies have shown that very high power short duration ablation (VHPSD) is also highly effective and fast to achieve PVI with potentially less arrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Data comparing PFA to VHPSD-PVI is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared procedural and outcome data for PFA-PVI to VHPSD-PVI in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF/persAF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing de novo PVI (PFA or VHPSD) were included in this analysis. For PFA-PVI a pentaspline 20 electrode catheter was used. For VHPSD-PVI an enhanced irrigated catheter with a power setting of 70 W/7 s (70 W/5 s at posterior wall) was employed in conjunction with electro-anatomical mapping. All procedures were performed in deep analgo-sedation.

RESULTS

A total of n = 114 patients (n = 57[50%] PFA, n = 17[30%] PAF; n = 40[70%] persAF) were included in this analysis. PVI was successful in all patients. The PFA group revealed a significantly shorter procedure duration (65 ± 17 min vs. 95 ± 23 min, p < 0.01) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA 15 ± 5 min and VHPSD 12 ± 3 min; p < 0.001). At follow-up after median 125 days (interquartile range: 109-162) n = 46 PFA (80.7%) and n = 44 VHPSD pts (77.2%) were free from atrial arrhythmia after a single procedure (p = 0.819). Two tamponades occurred in the PFA while in VHPSD two pts suffered groin bleedings. One clinically nonsignificant PV stenosis occurred in the VHPSD group.

CONCLUSION

Pulsed-field ablation and VHPSD-PVI seem to be highly effective and safe to achieve PVI in the setting of PAF and persAF with comparable arrhythmia-free survival. However, procedure duration for PFA PVI is significantly shorter and therefore may be of potential benefit. Compared to PFA VHPSD-PVI might ensure information on left atrial substrate allowing to target concomitant secondary tachycardias.

Atrial Ablation Lesion Evaluation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Review of Imaging Strategies and Histological Correlations

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a valuable noninvasive tool for evaluating tissue response following catheter ablation of atrial tissue. This review provides an overview of the contemporary CMR strategies to visualize atrial ablation lesions in both the acute and chronic postablation stages, focusing on their strengths and limitations. Moreover, the accuracy of CMR imaging in comparison to atrial lesion histology is discussed. T2-weighted CMR imaging is sensitive to edema and tends to overestimate lesion size in the acute stage after ablation. Noncontrast agent-enhanced T1-weighted CMR imaging has the potential to provide more accurate assessment of lesions in the acute stage but may not be as effective in the chronic stage. Late gadolinium enhancement imaging can be used to detect chronic atrial scarring, which may inform repeat ablation strategies. Moreover, novel imaging strategies are being developed, but their efficacy in characterizing atrial lesions is yet to be determined. Overall, CMR imaging has the potential to provide virtual histology that aids in evaluating the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation and monitoring of postprocedural myocardial changes. However, technical factors, scanning during arrhythmia, and transmurality assessment pose challenges. Therefore, further research is needed to develop CMR strategies to visualize the ablation lesion maturation process more effectively.

Index-Guided High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies have suggested the superiority of high-power compared to standard-power radiofrequency ablation ablation (RFCA). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-power compared to standard-power RFCA guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion index (LSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review and meta-analysis study comparing IGHP and IGLP approaches for AF ablation was conducted. The relevant published studies comparing IGHP and IGSP methods for RFCA in AF patients until October 2022 were collected from Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. A total of 2579 AF patients from 11 studies were included, 1682 received IGHP RFCA, and 897 received IGSP RFCA. To achieve successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the IGHP RFCA group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the IGHP RFCA group (mean difference (MD) -19.91 min; 95% CI -25.23 to -14.59 min; p < 0.01), radiofrequency (RF) application time (MD -10.92 min; 95% CI -14.70 to -7.13 min; p < 0.01), and fewer number of lesions (MD -10.90; 95% CI -18.77 to -3.02; p < 0.01) than the IGSP RFCA. First-pass PVI was significantly greater in the IGHP RFCA group than in the IGSP RFCA group (risk ratio (RR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; p < 0.01). The IGHP RFCA is an effective and efficient strategy for AF ablation. The superiority of IGHP RFCA includes the shorter procedure time, shorter RF application time, fewer number of lesions for complete PVI, and more excellent first-pass PVI.

Catheter Ablation for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: An Update of the Literature

Catheter ablation has been shown to be more effective at maintaining sinus rhythm and improving quality of life when compared to antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency and cryoablation are two effective methods. However, catheter-only ablation strategies have not consistently produced high success rates in treating longstanding and persistent AF patients. The emerging treatment of choice for such cases is hybrid ablation, which involves a multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach to achieve surgical ablation of the direct posterior left atrial wall in combination with endocardial catheter ablation. Studies have shown promising results for the hybrid approach when compared with catheter ablation alone, but it is not without risks. Large and randomised studies are necessary to further evaluate these strategies for managing AF.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety Profiles of High-power, Short-duration and Low-power, Long-duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is expected to be more effective and safer than low-power, long-duration (LPLD) RF ablation in treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Given the limited data available, the findings are controversial. This meta-analysis evaluated whether the clinical effects of HPSD outweigh those of LPLD. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases identified studies comparing HPSD to LPLD ablation. All the analyses used the random-effects model. This analysis included 21 studies with a total of 4,169 patients. Pooled analyses revealed that HPSD was associated with a lower recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) at 1 year (relative risk [RR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.78; P = .00001; I² = 0%). Furthermore, the HPSD approach reduced the risk of AF recurrence (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.40-1.01; P = .06; I² = 86%). The HPSD approach was associated with a lower risk of esophageal thermal injury (ETI) (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04; P = .09; I² = 73%). The HPSD strategy increased first-pass pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) and decreased acute PV reconnection (PVR), both of which were predominantly manifested in bilateral and left PVs. HPSD facilitated a reduction in procedural time, number of lesions created during PVI, and fluoroscopy time. The HPSD method reduces ETI, PVR, and recurrent AF. The HPSD approach also reduced the procedural time, number of lesions created during PVI, fluoroscopy time, and post-ablation AF relapse in 1 year, improving patient outcomes and safety.

Role of oesophageal cooling in the prevention of oesophageal injury in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of oesophageal cooling in the prevention of oesophageal injury in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through April 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of oesophageal cooling compared with control in the prevention of oesophageal injury during AF catheter ablation. The study primary outcome was the incidence of any oesophageal injury. The meta-analysis included 4 RCTs with a total of 294 patients. There was no difference in the incidence of any oesophageal injury between oesophageal cooling and control [15% vs. 19%; relative risk (RR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-2.41]. Compared with control, oesophageal cooling showed lower risk of severe oesophageal injury (1.5% vs. 9%; RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05-0.80). There were no significant differences among the two groups in mild to moderate oesophageal injury (13.6% vs. 12.1%; RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.28-4.23), procedure duration [standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.03; 95% CI -0.36-0.30], posterior wall radiofrequency (RF) time (SMD 0.27; 95% CI -0.04-0.58), total RF time (SMD -0.50; 95% CI -1.15-0.16), acute reconnection incidence (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.02-36.34), and ablation index (SMD 0.16; 95% CI -0.33-0.66).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing AF catheter ablation, oesophageal cooling did not reduce the overall risk of any oesophageal injury compared with control. Oesophageal cooling might shift the severity of oesophageal injuries to less severe injuries. Further studies should evaluate the long-term effects after oesophageal cooling during AF catheter ablation.

How far the zone of heat-induced transient block extends beyond the lesion during RF catheter cardiac ablation

PURPOSE

While radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) creates a lesion consisting of the tissue points subjected to lethal heating, the sublethal heating (SH) undergone by the surrounding tissue can cause transient electrophysiological block. The size of the zone of heat-induced transient block (HiTB) has not been quantified to date. Our objective was to use computer modeling to provide an initial estimate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used previous experimental data together with the Arrhenius damage index (Ω) to fix the Ω values that delineate this zone: a lower limit of 0.1-0.4 and upper limit of 1.0 (lesion boundary). An RFCA computer model was used with different power-duration settings, catheter positions and electrode insertion depths, together with dispersion of the tissue's electrical and thermal characteristics.

RESULTS

The HiTB zone extends in depth to a minimum and maximum distance of 0.5 mm and 2 mm beyond the lesion limit, respectively, while its maximum width varies with the energy delivered, extending to a minimum of 0.6 mm and a maximum of 2.5 mm beyond the lesion, reaching 3.5 mm when high energy settings are used (25 W-20s, 500 J). The dispersion of the tissue's thermal and electrical characteristics affects the size of the HiTB zone by ±0.3 mm in depth and ±0.5 mm in maximum width.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the size of the zone of heat-induced transient block during RFCA could extend beyond the lesion limit by a maximum of 2 mm in depth and approximately 2.5 mm in width.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of high-power vs. conventional-power radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation

Aim

To compare high-power (HP) vs. conventional-power (CP) radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled AF patients undergoing CP (30-40 W, 43 patients) or HP (50 W, 49 patients) radiofrequency ablation. Immediate pulmonary vein (PV) single-circle isolation, PV-ablation time, AF recurrence, AF recurrence-free survival, and complications were analyzed.

Results

Diabetes was more common in the CP group than in the HP group (27.91% vs. 10.20%, P = 0.029). The left PV single-circle isolation rate (62.79% vs. 65.31%), right PV single-circle isolation rate (48.84% vs. 53.06%), and bilateral PV single-circle isolation rate (32.56% vs. 38.78%; all P > 0.05) did not differ between the groups. Single-circle ablation times for the left PVs (12.79 ± 3.39 vs. 22.94 ± 6.39 min), right PVs (12.18 ± 3.46 vs. 20.67 ± 5.44 min), and all PVs (25.85 ± 6.04 vs. 45.66 ± 11.11 min; all P < 0.001) were shorter in the HP group. Atrial fibrillation recurrence within 3 months (13.95% vs. 18.37%), at 3 months (11.63% vs. 8.16%), and at 6 months after ablation (18.60% vs. 12.24%; all P > 0.05) was similar in both groups. Atrial fibrillation recurrence-free survival did not differ between the groups (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Cardiac rupture and pericardial tamponade did not occur in any patient. Pops occurred in 2 and 0 patients in the HP and CP groups, respectively (4.08% vs. 0.00%, P = 0.533).

Conclusion

High-power ablation improved operation time and efficiency without increasing complications.

Esophageal safety in CLOSE-guided 50W high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation - The PREHEAT-PVI-Registry

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using high-power-short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RF) is emerging as the standard of care for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). While procedural short-term to mid-term efficacy and efficiency are very promising, this registry aims to investigate esopahgeal safety using an optimized ablation approach.

METHODS

In a single-centre experience, 388 consecutive standardized first-time AF ablation were performed using a CLOSE-guided-fixed-50W-circumferential PVI and substrate modification without intraprocedural oesophageal temperature measurement. 300 patients underwent post-procedural esophageal endoscopy to diagnose and grade endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) and were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

EDEL were detected in 35 of 300 patients (11.6%), 25 of 35 were low-grade KCC 1 lesions with fast healing tendencies. 6 patients suffered KCC 2a lesions, 4 patients had KCC 2b lesions (1.3% of all patients). No esophageal perforation or fistula formation was observed. Patient baseline characteristics, especially patients age, gender and body-mass-index did not influence EDEL incidence. Additional posterior box isolation did not increase the incidence of EDEL. In patients diagnosed with EDEL, mean catheter contact force during posterior wall ablation was higher (11.9 ± 1.8 vs. 14.7 ± 3 grams, p<0.001), mean RF duration was shorter (11.9 ± 1 vs. 10.7 ± 1.2 sec., p<0.001), while achieved AI was not different between groups (434 ± 4.9 vs. 433 ± 9.5, n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of EDEL after CLOSE-guided-50W-HPSD PVI is lower compared to historical cohorts using standard-power RF settings. Catheter contact force during posterior HPSD ablation should not exceed 15 grams. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety between high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods. Studies comparing HPSD and traditional applications in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation from inception through December 2021 were searched on Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Results. The meta-analysis included seventeen studies with a total of 4934 patients. HPSD group decreased procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −38.28 min, $P<0.001$ ), RF duration (MD −20.51 min, $P<0.001$ ), fluoroscopy duration (MD −5.19 min, $P<0.001$ ), and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (Odds ratio (OR) 0.40, $P<0.001$ ), while improving the freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.94, $P=0.005$ ) and rates of first-pass isolation (OR 8.92, $P=0.001$ ). Compared with the conventional group, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year follow-up was higher in the HPSD group without the guidance of AI/LSI (OR 1.66, $P=0.01$ ) and studies with a power setting of 40–50 W (OR 1.93, $P=0.002$ ). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar effectiveness with a power setting of 50 W in the HPSD RFA (OR 1.10, $P=0.52$ ). There was no difference in complications between the two groups ( $P=0.71$ ). Conclusion. HPSD RFA was associated with shorter procedure duration, higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia, and comparable safety compared to conventional RFA.

Impact of High-Power and Very High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Procedure Characteristics and First-Pass Isolation During Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Introduction

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation has been proposed to produce rapid and effective lesions for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aimed to evaluate the procedural characteristics and the first-pass isolation (FPI) rate of HPSD and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation compared to the low-power long-duration (LPLD) ablation technique.

Methods

One hundred fifty-six patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled and assigned to LPLD, HPSD, or vHPSD PVI. The energy setting was 30, 50, and 90 W in the LPLD, HPSD, and vHPSD groups, respectively. In the vHPSD group, 90 W/4 s energy delivery was used in the QMODE+ setting. In the other groups, ablation index-guided applications were delivered with 30 W (LPLD) or 50 W (HPSD).

Results

Bilateral PVI was achieved in all cases. Compared to the LPLD group, the HPSD and vHPSD groups had shorter procedure time [85 (75–101) min, 79 (65–91) min, and 70 (53–83) min], left atrial dwelling time [61 (55–70) min, 53 (41–56) min, and 45 (34–52) min], total RF time [1,567 (1,366–1,761) s, 1,398 (1,021–1,711) s, and 336 (247–386) s], but higher bilateral FPI rate (57, 78, and 80%) (all p-values &lt; 0.01). The use of HPSD (OR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.15–6.44, p = 0.023) and vHPSD (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.24–6.44, p = 0.014) ablation techniques were associated with a higher probability of bilateral FPI. The 9-month AF-recurrence rate was lower in case of HPSD and vHPSD compared to LPLD ablation (10, 8, and 36%, p = 0.0001). Moreover, the presence of FPI was associated with a lower AF-recurrence rate at 9-month (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04–0.24, p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Our prospective, observational cohort study showed that both HPSD and vHPSD RF ablation shortens procedure and RF time and results in a higher rate of FPI compared to LPLD ablation. Moreover, the use of HPSD and vHPSD ablation increased the acute and mid-term success rate. No safety concerns were raised for HPSD or vHPSD ablation in our study.

Ablation index-guided 50W radiofrequency ablation for left atrial posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation

Background

Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation for posterior wall isolation (PWI) using high-power, short-duration remains untested. We sought to evaluate the acute outcomes of AI-guided 50 W ablation vs. conventional ablation, and investigate the differences in relationship between contact force (CF), time and AI in both groups.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing first-time AI-guided ablation with PWI using either 50 W or 35–40 W ablation were enrolled. Acute procedural metrics and individual lesion level ablation data were compared between groups.

Results

40 patients (50 W: n = 20, 35–40 W: n = 20) with atrial fibrillation were included. Total procedure time was significantly reduced with 50 W (120 vs. 143 mins, p = 0.004) and there was a trend toward decreased ablation time (22 vs. 28 mins, p = 0.052). First pass and acute success of PWI were comparable between the 50 W and 35–40 W groups (10 vs. 8 patients, p = 0.525 and 20 vs. 19 patients, p = 1.000, respectively). Individual lesion analysis of all 959 RF applications (50 W: n = 458, 35–40 W: n = 501) demonstrated that 50 W ablation led to lower ablation time per lesion (10.4 vs. 13.0s, p < 0.001), and increased AI (471 vs. 461, p < 0.001) and impedance drop (7.4 vs. 6.9ohms, p = 0.007). Excessive ablations (AI>600 for roof line; AI>500 elsewhere) were more frequently observed in the 50 W group (9.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.007). CF had very good discriminative capability for excessive ablation in both groups. At 50 W, limiting the CF to <10 g reduced the number of excessive ablations on the floor line and within the posterior box to 12% and 4%,respectively. Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

AI-guided 50 W RF ablation reduces the ablation time of individual lesions and total procedure time without compromising first pass and acute success rates of PWI or 12-month outcomes compared to conventional powers.

Reconnection patterns after high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation Reconnection patterns after CLOSE-guided 50W high-power-short-duration circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification - PV reconnection might no longer be an issue

INTRODUCTION

Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) with high-power-short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) technology is emerging as a new standard of care in many electrophysiology laboratories. While procedural short-term efficacy and efficiency is very promising, little is known about mid- to long-term effects of HPSD ablation for pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial substrate modification.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a single-centre registry, 412 AF procedures were performed in 400 individual patients using a standardized CLOSE protocol guided fixed 50W HPSD ablation, aiming for an ablation index (AI) of 400 on the posterior and 550 on the anterior wall. Additional substrate-tailored lines were performed when required. After a mean clinical follow-up of 337 ± 134 days, 15 patients suffered from AF recurrence beyond the blinding period. 12 gave consent to the indicated re-ablation. Here, 11 of 12 patients had chronic isolation of all 4 pulmonary veins (PV). In 3 of 6 patients, a reconnection of additional left atrial ablation lines was revealed. 10 out of 12 patients showed progressive fibrous atrial cardiomyopathy and required additional left atrial substrate modification or re-isolation of left-atrial lines. During the follow-up no clinical case of atrioesophageal fistula was registered. No PV stenosis after initial HPSD PVI was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring re-ablation of AF or other atrial tachycardia after a fixed 50W HPSD circumferential PVI and substrate modification predominantly suffer from progressive fibrous atrial cardiomyopathy, while PV reconnection appears to be a rare cause of AF recurrence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Systematic Characterization of High-Power Short-Duration Ablation: Insight From an Advanced Virtual Model

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) recently emerged as a new approach to radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. However, basic and clinical data supporting its effectiveness and safety is still scarce.

Objective: We aim to characterize HPSD with an advanced virtual model, able to assess lesion dimensions and complications in multiple conditions and compare it to standard protocols.

Methods: We evaluate, on both atrium and ventricle, three HPSD protocols (70 W/8 s, 80 W/6 s, and 90 W/4 s) through a realistic 3D computational model of power-controlled RF ablation, varying catheter tip design (spherical/cylindrical), contact force (CF), blood flow, and saline irrigation. Lesions are defined by the 50°C isotherm contour. Ablations are deemed safe or complicated by pop (tissue temperature >97°C) or charring (blood temperature >80°C). We compared HPSD with standards protocols (30–40 W/30 s). We analyzed the effect of a second HPSD application.

Results: We simulated 432 applications. Most (79%) associated a complication, especially in the atrium. The three HPSD protocols performed similarly in the atrium, while 90 W/4 s appeared the safest in the ventricle. Low irrigation rate led frequently to charring (72%). High-power short-duration lesions were 40–60% shallower and smaller in volume compared to standards, although featuring similar width. A second HPSD application increased lesions to a size comparable to standards.

Conclusion: High-power short-duration lesions are smaller in volume and more superficial than standards but comparable in width, which can be advantageous in the atrium. A second application can produce lesions similar to standards in a shorter time. Despite its narrow safety margin, HPSD seems a valuable new clinical approach.

Preventing esophageal complications from atrial fibrillation ablation: A review

Atrioesophageal fistula is a life-threatening complication of ablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. Methods to reduce the risk of esophageal injury have evolved over the last decade, and diagnosis of this complication remains difficult and therefore challenging to treat in a timely manner. Delayed diagnosis leads to treatment occurring in the context of a critically ill patient, contributing to the poor prognosis associated with this complication. The associated mortality risk can be as high as 70%. Recent important advances in preventative techniques are explored in this review.

Preventative techniques used in current clinical practice are discussed, which include high-power short-duration ablation, esophageal temperature probe monitoring, cryotherapy and laser balloon technologies, and use of proton pump inhibitors. A lack of randomized clinical evidence for the effectiveness of these practical methods are found. Alternative methods of esophageal protection has emerged in recent years, including mechanical deviation of the esophagus and esophageal temperature control (esophageal cooling). Although these are fairly recent methods, we discuss the available evidence to date. Mechanical deviation of the esophagus is due to undergo its first randomized study. Recent randomized study on esophageal cooling has shown promise of its effectiveness in preventing thermal injuries. Lastly, novel ablation technology that may be the future of esophageal protection, pulsed field ablation, is discussed.

The findings of this review suggest that more robust clinical evidence for esophageal protection methods is warranted to improve the safety of atrial fibrillation ablation.

Relationship between luminal esophageal temperature and volume of esophageal injury during RF ablation: In silico study comparing low power-moderate duration vs. high power-short duration

OBJECTIVE

To model the evolution of peak temperature and volume of damaged esophagus during and after radiofrequency (RF) ablation using low power-moderate duration (LPMD) versus high power-short duration (HPSD) or very high power-very short duration (VHPVSD) settings.

METHODS

An in silico simulation model of RF ablation accounting for left atrial wall thickness, nearby organs and tissues, as well as catheter contact force. The model used the Arrhenius equation to derive a thermal damage model and estimate the volume of esophageal damage over time during and after RF application under conditions of LPMD (30 W, 20 s), HPSD (50 W, 6 s), and VHPVSD (90 W, 4 s).

RESULTS

There was a close correlation between maximum peak temperature after RF application and volume of esophageal damage, with highest correlation (R²  = 0.97) and highest volume of esophageal injury in the LPMD group. A greater increase in peak temperature and greater relative increase in esophageal injury volume in the HPSD (240%) and VHPSD (270%) simulations occurred after RF termination. Increased endocardial to esophageal thickness was associated with a longer time to maximum peak temperature (R²  > 0.92), especially in the HPSD/VHPVSD simulations, and no esophageal injury was seen when the distances were >4.5 mm for LPMD or >3.5 mm for HPSD.

CONCLUSION

LPMD is associated with a larger total volume of esophageal damage due to the greater total RF energy delivery. HPSD and VHPVSD shows significant thermal latency (resulting from conductive tissue heating after RF termination), suggesting a requirement for fewer esophageal temperature cutoffs during ablation.

Recent clinical trials in atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of atrial fibrillation can be overwhelming with the amount of information and treatment options available today. This review discusses landmark and other clinically relevant trials published in the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been several recent key clinical trials and subanalyses in the field of atrial fibrillation. Early rhythm control with ablation or antiarrhythmic medications has upended the previous practice of rate control for patients with atrial fibrillation. Vein of Marshall alcohol ablation in combination with endocardial mitral annular ablation and a hybrid epicardial/endocardial approach has shown promising results in the fight against persistent atrial fibrillation. Early ablation with cryoballoon therapy vs. antiarrhythmic therapy gives further evidence for early ablation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

SUMMARY

The rapid development in technology and medications to treat atrial fibrillation, prevent stroke and improve quality of life for patients has created a vast amount of information for physicians to process. The present review will focus on the recent (within 2 years) clinical trials in atrial fibrillation and the impact they may have on your practice.

High-power, short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: Pros and cons

This article reviews and compares the rationale and evidence supporting high-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) ablation with those of conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The pros and cons of each approach, biophysics of ablation, pre-clinical studies informing clinical utilization, and the accumulated clinical evidence are presented. Both conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation and high-power, short-duration ablation are similarly safe, and effective approaches for AF ablation. Theoretical advantages of high-power, short-duration ablation, including greater procedure efficiency and limited conductive heating of collateral structures, must be weighed against the narrower safety margin related to rapid energy delivery during high power ablation.

The superiority of high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) using the high-power short duration (HPSD) results in better ablation lesion formation in the swine model. This systematic review and meta-analysis purposed to investigate the safety and efficacy profile between HPSD and low-power long-duration (LPLD) ablation strategies to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

METHODS

We completed the literature review after identifying the relevant articles comparing HPSD and LPLD ablation methods for AF recorded in ClinicalTrials.com, CENTRAL, PubMed, and ScienceDirect until February 2021. The overall effects were calculated using pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for categorical and continuous data, respectively. We also estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The HPSD strategy took shorter procedure time (MD = -33.75 min; 95% CI = -44.54 to -22.97; P < .01), fluoroscopy time (MD = -5.73 min; 95% CI = -8.77 to -2.70; P < .001), and ablation time (MD = -17.71; 95% CI = -21.02 to -14.41) than LPLD strategy. The HPSD RFCA was correlated with lower risk of esophageal thermal injury (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.94; P = .02). The HPSD method resulted in higher first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (RR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.64; P < .01), lower PV reconnection (RR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.64; P < .01), and lower recurrent AF (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.96; P = .02) than LPLD strategy.

CONCLUSION

HPSD RFCA was superior to the conventional LPLD RFCA in terms of safety and efficacy in treating AF patients.

Procedural efficacy and safety of standardized, ablation index guided fixed 50 W high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification using the CLOSE protocol

INTRODUCTION

Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation according to the CLOSE protocol is very effective in terms of chronic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, the optimal radiofrequency (RF) power remains controversial. Here, we thought to investigate the efficiency and safety of an AI-guided fixed circumferential 50 W high-power short-duration (HPSD) PVI using the CLOSE protocol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a single-center trial, 40 patients underwent randomized PVI using AI-guided ablation without esophageal temperature monitoring. In 20 patients a CLOSE protocol guided fixed 50 W HPSD was followed irrespective of the anatomical localization. Twenty subjects were treated according to the CLOSE protocol with standard power settings (20 W posterior and 40 W roof and anterior wall). In addition, 80 consecutive patients were treated according to the HPSD protocol to gather additional safety data. All patients underwent postprocedural esophagogastroduodenoscopy to reveal esophageal lesions (EDELs). The mean total procedural time was 80.3 ± 22.5 in HPSD compared to control 109.1 ± 27.4 min (p < .001). The total RF-time was significantly lower in HPSD with 1379 ± 505 s versus control 2374 ± 619 s (p < .001). There were no differences in periprocedural complications. EDEL occurred in 13% in the HPSD and 10% in the control group. EDEL occurring in the 50 W HSDP patients were smaller, more superficial, and had a faster healing tendency.

CONCLUSION

A fixed 50 W HPSD circumferential PVI relying on the AI and CLOSE protocol reduce the total procedure time and the total RF time, without increasing the complication rates. The incidence of EDELs was similar using 50 W at the posterior atrial wall.

Comparison of In Vivo Tissue Temperature Profile and Lesion Geometry for Radiofrequency Ablation With High Power-Short Duration and Moderate Power-Moderate Duration: Effects of Thermal Latency and Contact Force on Lesion Formation

[Figure: see text].