Skin sympathetic nerve activity in different ablation settings for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Modifying the autonomic system after catheter ablation may prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evaluation of skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) is a noninvasive method for the assessment of sympathetic activity. However, there are few studies on the effects of different energy settings on SKNA.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes in SKNA in different energy settings and their relationship to AF ablation outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were enrolled. Forty-three patients received AF ablation with the conventional (ConV) energy setting (low power for long duration), and 29 patients using a high-power, short-duration (HPSD) strategy. The SKNA was acquired from the right arm 1 day before and after the radiofrequency ablation. We analyzed the SKNA and ablation outcomes in the different energy settings.

RESULTS

Both groups had a similar baseline average SKNA (aSKNA). We found that the median aSKNA increased significantly from 446.82 μV to 805.93 μV (p = 0.003) in the ConV group but not in the HPSD group. In the ConV group, patients without AF recurrence had higher aSKNA values. However, the 1-year AF recurrence rate remained similar between both groups (35 % vs. 28 %, p = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

The post-ablation aSKNA levels increased significantly in the ConV group but did not change significantly in the HPSD group, which may reflect different neuromodulatory effects. However, the one-year AF recurrence rates were similar for both groups. These results demonstrate that the HPSD strategy has durable lesion creation but less lesion depth, which may reduce collateral damage.

Atrial fibrillation ablation workflow optimization facilitated by high-power short-duration ablation and high-resolution mapping

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a time-demanding procedure. High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation protocols and high-density mapping catheters have recently been introduced to clinical practice. We investigated the impact of high-density mapping and HPSD ablation protocols on procedural timing, efficacy, and safety by comparing different standardized set-ups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three electrophysiology (EP) laboratory set-ups were analysed: (i) circular catheter for mapping and HPSD ablation with 30/35 W guided by an ablation index (AI); (ii) pentaspline catheter for mapping an HPSD ablation with 50 W guided by an AI; and (iii) pentaspline catheter for mapping and HPSD ablation with 90 W over 4 s using a novel ablation catheter. All patients underwent PVI without additional left atrial ablation strategies. Procedural data and operating intervals in the EP laboratory were systematically analysed. Three hundred seven patients were analysed (30/35 W AI: n = 102, 50 W AI: n = 102, 90 W/4 s: n = 103). Skin-to-skin times [105.3 ± 22.7 (30/35 W AI) vs. 81.4 ± 21.3 (50 W AI) vs. 69.5 ± 12.2 (90 W/4 s) min, P ≤ 0.001] and total laboratory times (132.8 ± 42.1 vs. 107.4 ± 25.7 vs. 95.2 ± 14.0 min, P < 0.001) significantly differed among the study groups. Laboratory interval analysis revealed significant shortening of mapping and ablation times. Arrhythmia-free survival after 12 months was not different among the study groups (log-rank P = 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The integration of high-density mapping and HPSD protocols into an institutional AF ablation process resulted in reduced procedure times without compromising safety or efficacy.

Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation using true high-power short-duration vs. cryoballoon ablation

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is achievable and effective using radiofrequency (RF) catheter (CA) or cryoballoon (CB) ablation. The newly introduced high RF-power short-duration ablation (HPSD) technique has shown promising results. Data comparing HPSD- to CB-PVI is sparse. We sought to investigate success rates and procedural differences of HPSD-PVI vs. CB-PVI in patients undergoing ablation for PAF and persAF.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing de novo PVI (HPSD or CB) were included. A power setting of 70W/7 s (70W/5 s at posterior wall) using a flexible tip catheter with enhanced irrigation was considered as true HPSD. Follow-up consisted of out-clinic pts visits, tele-consultation, 48-h Holter ECG, app-based telemonitoring and cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) interrogation.

RESULTS

721 patients (46 HPSD, 675 CB) were analyzed. In all HPSD (27 persAF [59%]) and CB patients (423 persAF [63%]), PVI was successfully achieved. Procedure duration was significantly longer for HPSD (91 ± 19 min vs. 72 ± 18 min, p < 0.01). Ablation time was similar in both groups (HPSD: 44 ± 19 min vs. CB: 40 ± 17 min; p = 0.347). No major complications occurred in HPSD. For CB-PVI, in 25 (3.7%; p = 0.296) patients, complications occurred. At a follow-up of 290 ± 135 days, arrhythmia-free survival using HPSD was non-inferior to CB-PVI in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.096).

CONCLUSION

PVI using HPSD is equally effective and safe to CB-PVI. This analysis revealed a similar arrhythmia-free survival after HPSD and CB with low complication rates. Procedure duration for CB was significantly shorter while LA dwell time excluding mapping was equal. Currently, a prospective trial is conducted to corroborate these findings.

Magnetic resonance assessment of left atrial scar formation following a novel very high-power short-duration workflow for atrial fibrillation ablation

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation protocols using energy delivery with very high power and short duration (vHPSD) have been introduced to improve lesion formation. This study reports procedural data of vHPSD ablation in AF patients and analyses characteristics of ablation-induced left atrial (LA) scar formation from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing index pulmonary vein isolation following our institutional Q4U-AF workflow were prospectively enrolled. Ablation was conducted using a contact force sensing catheter allowing for vHPSD ablation using a temperature-controlled ablation mode. Thirty patients underwent cardiac late gadolinium enhancement MRI of the LA 3 months after ablation to assess LA scar.  Mean procedural duration was 66.5 ± 14.8 min. Mean ablation time was 4.7 ± 0.9 min with a mean number of 69.9 ± 14.2 applications. First-pass isolation was achieved in 51 patients (85%) for the right pulmonary veins (RPVs), in 37 patients (61.7%) for the left pulmonary veins (LPVs), and in 34 patients (56.7%) for both pulmonary veins (PVs). Magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months post-ablation demonstrated a mean scar width of 14.4 ± 2.6 mm around RPVs and 11.9 ± 1.9 mm at LPVs (P > 0.05). Complete PV encirclement was observed in 76.7% for RPVs, in 76.7% for LPVs, and in 66.7% for both PV pairs. During a mean follow-up of 4.7 ± 1.4 months, arrhythmia recurrence was observed in 3.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary vein isolation following a novel vHPSD workflow resulted in short procedure duration and high acute and mid-term efficacy. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated durable and transmural PV lesions with homogeneous and contiguous scar formation.