Induction of multinucleated cells caused by UVA exposure in different stages of the cell cycle

Mechanism of cell death resulting from DNA interstrand cross-linking in mammalian cells

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are critical cytotoxic lesions produced by cancer chemotherapeutic agents such as the nitrogen mustards and platinum drugs; however, the exact mechanism of ICL-induced cell death is unclear. Here, we show a novel mechanism of p53-independent apoptotic cell death involving prolonged cell-cycle (G₂) arrest, ICL repair involving HR, transient mitosis, incomplete cytokinesis, and gross chromosomal abnormalities resulting from ICLs in mammalian cells. This characteristic ‘giant' cell death, observed by using time-lapse video microscopy, was reduced in ICL repair ERCC1- and XRCC3-deficient cells. Collectively, the results illustrate the coordination of ICL-induced cellular responses, including cell-cycle arrest, DNA damage repair, and cell death.

Reasons to reconsider the significance of apoptosis for cancer therapy

In recent years, the significance of apoptosis as a process in cell loss from normal tissue and tumours has been critically reviewed. In addition, the general lack of a correlation between radiation or drug-induced apoptosis and cell survival responses (using the clonogenic assay) in tumour cells has been demonstrated. Several different reasons have been discussed by other authors. It is the purpose of this review to argue that there are many different forms of cell death (terminal differentiation, micronucleation, mitotic catastrophe or multinucleation) that, like apoptosis, are regulated by the cell. In this context, apoptosis was the first cell death mechanism associated with active involvement of the cell (signal transduction). Furthermore, a large variety of different in vitro and a few in vivo models published so far show that the form of cell death can shift from, for example, mitotic catastrophe to apoptosis. The shift appears to be a general principle and depends on the cell model examined, the stressor type and the stressor intensity. These considerations help to explain the absence of a simple link between apoptosis and clonogenicity and suggest how to overcome that limitation, which has implications for the significance of apoptosis where the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer are concerned.