Single-Center Experience With the Talent LPS Endograft in Patients With at Least 5 Years of Follow-up

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term survival After Elective Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair 1969-2011: 5 Year Survival Remains Poor Despite Advances in Medical Care and Treatment Strategies

Background

Improved critical care, pre-operative optimization, and the advent of endovascular surgery (EVAR) have improved 30 day mortality for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. It remains unknown whether this has translated into improvements in long-term survival, particularly because these factors have also encouraged the treatment of older patients with greater comorbidity. The aim of this study was to quantify how 5 year survival after elective AAA repair has changed over time.

Methods

A systematic review was performed identifying studies reporting 5 year survival after elective infrarenal AAA repair. An electronic search of the Embase and Medline databases was conducted to January 2014. Thirty-six studies, 60 study arms, and 107,814 patients were identified. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine 5 year survival and to report whether 5 year survival changed over time.

Results

Five-year survival was 69% (95% CI 67 to 71%, I² = 87%). Meta-regression on study midpoint showed no improvement in 5 year survival over the period 1969–2011 (log OR −0.001, 95% CI −0.014–0.012). Larger average aneurysm diameter was associated with poorer 5 year survival (adjusted log OR −0.058, 95% CI −0.095 to −0.021, I² = 85%). Older average patient age at surgery was associated with poorer 5 year survival (adjusted log OR −0.118, 95% CI −0.142 to −0.094, I² = 70%). After adjusting for average patient age, an improvement in 5 year survival over the period that these data spanned was obtained (adjusted log OR 0.027, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.042).

Conclusion

Five-year survival remains poor after elective AAA repair despite advances in short-term outcomes and is associated with AAA diameter and patient age at the time of surgery. Age-adjusted survival appears to have improved; however, this cohort as a whole continues to have poor long-term survival. Research in this field should attempt to improve the life expectancy of patients with repaired AAA and to optimise patient selection.

Relining of an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft 9 years after placement

We describe a case of delayed failure with an aortic stent graft 104 months after the graft was initially placed. This case details an endovascular strategy of dealing with the loss of stent graft integrity and underscores the importance of continued follow-up of patients with aortic stent grafts.

Technical and clinical outcome of Talent versus Endurant endografts for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Objective

The technical evolution of endografts for the interventional management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has allowed a continuous expansion of indications. This study compares the established Talent endograft with its successor, the Endurant endograft, taking individual aortoiliac anatomy into account.

Methods

From June 2007 to December 2010, 35 patients with AAA were treated with a Talent endograft (33 men) and 36 patients with an Endurant endograft (34 men). Aortoiliac anatomy was evaluated in detail using preinterventional computed tomography angiography. The 30-day outcome of both groups were compared regarding technical and clinical success as well as complications including endoleaks.

Results

The Endurant group included more patients with unfavorable anatomy (kinking of pelvic arteries, p = 0.017; shorter proximal neck, p = 0.084). Primary technical success was 91.4% in the Talent group and 100% in the Endurant group (p = 0.115). Type 1 endoleaks occurred in 5.7% of patients in the Talent group and in 2.8% of those in the Endurant group (p = 0.614). Type 3 endoleaks only occurred in the Talent group (2.9% of patients; p = 0.493). Type 2 endoleaks were significantly less common in the Endurant group than in the Talent group (8.3% versus 28.6%; p = 0.035). Rates of major and minor complications were not significantly different between both groups. Primary clinical success was significantly better in the Endurant group (97.2%) than in the Talent group (80.0%) (p = 0.028).

Conclusion

Endurant endografts appear to have better technical and clinical outcome in patients with difficult aortoiliac anatomy, significantly reducing the occurrence of type 2 endoleaks.

Outcome of renal stenting for renal artery coverage during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine the outcome of adjunctive renal artery stenting for renal artery coverage at the time of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Between August 2000 and August 2008, 29 patients underwent elective EVAR using bifurcated Zenith stent grafts (Cook, Indianapolis, Ind) and simultaneous renal artery stenting. Renal artery stenting during EVAR was performed with endograft "encroachment" on the renal artery ostium (n = 23) or placement of a renal stent parallel to the main body of the endograft ("snorkel," n = 8). Follow-up included routine contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), multiview abdominal radiographs, and serum creatinine measurement at 1, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

Thirty-one renal arteries were stented successfully in 29 patients. The 18 patients with planned renal artery stent placement had a proximal neck length <15 mm. Mean proximal neck length was shorter in patients who underwent the "snorkel" technique (6.9 +/- 3.1 mm) compared with those with planned endograft encroachment (9.9 +/- 2.6 mm). None of the patients with unplanned endograft encroachment had neck lengths <15 mm (mean length, 26.3 +/- 10.2 mm). Mean proximal neck angulation was 42.8 degrees +/- 24.0 degrees and did not differ between the groups. One patient had a type I endoleak on completion angiography, and two additional patients had a type I endoleak on the first postoperative CT scan. All type I endoleaks resolved by the 1-month postoperative CT scan. The primary assisted patency of renal artery stents was 100% at a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 2 days-77.4 months). In one patient near occlusion of a renal artery stent was noted on follow-up CT scan at 9 months; patency was restored by placement of an additional stent. One patient required dialysis after sustained hypotension from a right external iliac artery injury that resulted in prolonged postoperative bleeding. Mean serum creatinine was 1.1 +/- 0.3 mg/dL at baseline, 1.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dL at 1 month of follow-up, and 1.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dL at 2 years of follow-up. There were no late type I endoleaks (>1 month postoperatively) or stent graft migrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive renal artery stenting during endovascular AAA repair using the "encroachment" and "snorkel" techniques is safe and effective. Short- and medium-term primary patency rates are excellent, but careful follow-up is needed to determine the durability of these techniques.