Endovascular treatment for extensive aortoiliac artery reconstruction: a single-center experience based on 1712 interventions

10년간의 3차 의료기관 경험을 바탕으로 한 대동맥장골동맥 폐색 질환 혈관내 치료의 기술적 고찰: 후향적 연구

Purpose

To examine the technical considerations of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) based on a 10-year experience in Songklanagarind Hospital.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for symptomatic AIOD between January 2010 and December 2020. The patients' clinical and lesion characteristics, including technical considerations of the procedure, were collected, analyzed, and stratified using the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).

Results

Most patients (80%) in this study had chronic limb-threatening ischemia lesions, with an occlusion rate of 37%. The technical success rate of TASC C & D was lower than that of TASC A & B, 84.4% vs. 99.2% p ≤ 0.001. A technical success rate of 93.3% (14/15) was found for the femoral and brachial approach, compared with a success rate of 89.0% (57/64) for the unibifemoral approach in TASC C & D, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.076). However, the puncture site complications in this route were up to 17.6%, which is the highest rate compared with other techniques. These complications could be treated either conservatively or minimally invasively.

Conclusion

In cases of failed femoral access, simultaneous femoral and brachial approaches improved the technical success rate of endovascular recanalization of TASC C & D aortoiliac occlusions.

Outcomes of balloon angioplasty and stent placement for iliac artery lesions classified as TASC II A, B: a single-center study

Background

Iliac artery stenosis or occlusion is a critical condition that can severely impact a patient's quality of life. The effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and intraluminal stenting for the treatment of iliac artery lesions classified as TASC II A and B was evaluated in this single-center prospective study.

Methods

Conducted between October 2016 and September 2020 at Cho Ray Hospital's Vascular Surgery Department, this prospective study involved PAD patients categorized by TASC II A and B classifications who underwent endovascular intervention. Intervention outcomes were assessed peri-procedure and during short-term and mid-term follow-ups.

Results

Of the total of 133 patients, 34.6% underwent balloon angioplasty, while 65.4% received stenting. The immediate technical success rate was 97.7%, while the clinical success rate was 62.4%. Complications were minimal, with major limb amputation reported in 1.5% of the cases. There was a significant improvement in Rutherford classification and ABI at short-term follow-up, with a patency rate of 90.2%. The mid-term post-intervention follow-up yielded similar results with an 86.1% patency rate. The mortality rates associated with arterial occlusion were 2.3% during short-term follow-up and 1.7% during mid-term follow-up.

Conclusion

Balloon angioplasty and stent placement are effective and safe interventions for TASC II A and B iliac artery occlusions with favorable short and mid-term outcomes. Further, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes are recommended for more comprehensive conclusions, including long-term follow-up assessment.

"Catheter Kissing" Technique to Recanalize Chronic Total Occlusions in Iliac Artery with Wire-Catheter Approach

BACKGROUND

To describe a technique in which 2 5-F curved catheters were used to facilitate the wire-catheter approach for recanalizing chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in the iliac arteries concurrently affecting the common iliac artery and external iliac artery.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective analysis involving endovascular recanalization of 17 iliac artery CTOs in 15 patients (mean age: 73.66 years; all men) between January 2019 and October 2022 using the subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention technique. With antegrade and retrograde guidewires in the subintimal spaces of CTOs, the location where the 2 guidewires seemed to overlap was identified as the rendezvous point. Although the 2 guidewires appeared to be in close proximity, there was no evidence that the bidirectional subintimal channels were connected. If several initial attempts failed, 2 5-F multipurpose catheters were introduced to the rendezvous point, followed by twisting, pulling, and pushing maneuvers until the tips of the catheters touched, indicating that the bidirectional subintimal channels were joined. A second wire rendezvous attempt was then employed to create a flossing-type guidewire. Outcome measurements included technical success, rendezvous points, complications, and procedure duration.

RESULTS

Among this cohort, 80.0% smoked and 66.7% had hypertension. In 11 limbs (64.7%), when initial wire rendezvous attempts failed, the "catheter kissing" technique was employed to successfully recanalize iliac artery CTOs, taking an average of 3.80 ± 1.64 min to complete the secondary wire rendezvous. The average length of CTOs was 111.06 ± 9.99 mm, with 7 (41.2%) and 8 (47.1%) cases exhibiting severe calcification and flush occlusion, respectively. The wire rendezvous point for all cases was in external iliac artery and the average time for successful secondary wire rendezvous was 3.80 ± 1.64 min. All patients were treated with iliac artery stents. No statistically significant difference was observed between the puncture sites of the common femoral artery and superficial femoral artery in relation to failure of the primary wire rendezvous (P = 0.644). No in-hospital deaths or complications were associated with the procedure, including iliac artery rupture, distal embolization, or access site complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with extensive iliac artery CTOs, the "catheter kissing" technique may offer an effective and time-efficient recanalization approach, without requiring additional specialized devices. Importantly, the risk of complications remains unchanged even when employing a wire rendezvous in a challenging subintimal space.

A Cost-Consequence Analysis Comparing Balloon-Expandable Covered Stents for the Management of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

PURPOSE

To compare procedural and long-term costs associated with the use of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stents (BECS) in the management of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease (AIOD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cost-consequence model was developed to simulate the intra- and post-operative management of patients with AIOD from the perspective of private health-payers. The study assessed the costs of the LifeStream (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey), iCAST/Advanta V12 (Getinge, Goteborg, Sweden), BeGraft Peripheral (Bentley, Hechingen, Germany), and Viabahn Balloon Expandable (VBX) (W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, Arizona) BECS devices. Device costs were identified from the Australian Prosthesis List, whereas clinical outcomes of BECS were estimated from a systematic review of the literature. Costs were calculated over 24 and 36 month time horizons and reported in US dollars.

RESULTS

Long-term, per-patient cost of each device at 24 and 36 months was $6253/$6634 for the LifeStream; $6359/$6869 for the iCAST/Advanta V12; $4806 (data available to 24 months) for the BeGraft Peripheral; and $4839/$5046 for the Viabahn VBX, respectively. Most of the cost difference was attributed to the number of stents required per treated limb and frequency of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization events.

CONCLUSIONS

Best-available clinical evidence and economic modeling demonstrates that the BeGraft Peripheral and Viabahn VBX were of similar cost and the least costly options at 24 months, whereas at 36 months, the lowest cost BECS option for the treatment of AIOD was the Viabahn VBX.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This analysis supports economically informed decision-making for health-payers managing systems that care for patients with AIOD. Stent length and avoiding reintervention were identified as key areas of cost-saving for future BECS development.

Contemporary Minimally Invasive Surgery for TASC-D Aorto-Iliac Lesions: Analysis of Outcomes and Risk Factors for Primary and Secondary Patency

BACKGROUND

For complex extensive TASC-II D lesions, the standard of care remains conventional surgery. Nevertheless, guidelines tend to broaden endovascular surgery indications in expert centers for patients at high surgical risk with TASC-II D lesions. Due to the increasing use of endovascular surgery in this setting, we planned to evaluate the patency rate of this approach.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary center. All patients treated for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with classified D lesions according to the TASC-II classification and requiring management of the aortoiliac bifurcation were retrospectively included between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. The type of surgical approach was classified as a pure percutaneous approach or hybrid surgery. The main objective was to describe long-term patency results. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for loss of patency and long-term complications. The primary outcomes were primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency at 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. For the overall population, the primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency proportions at 5 years were 71.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63.2-81%), 82.1% (95% CI 74.9-89.3%), 96.3% (95% CI 92-100%), respectively. For primary patency, there was a significant difference in favor of the covered stent group at 36 months (P < 0.01) and 60 months (P = 0.037). In a multivariate model, only CS and age were associated with a better primary patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, CI 95% [0.15-0.83], P = 0.0193 and an HR 0.07, 95% CI [0.05-0.09], P = 0.005, respectively). The overall rate of perioperative complications was 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

We report that endovascular and hybrid surgery are safe and effective in the management of TASC-D complex aortoiliac lesions in mid to long-term follow-up. Short-term and long-term complications were all considered as minor.

Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) describes the partial or complete occlusion of blood flow in the distal arteries of the body. A decreased arterial patency may occur due to a reduction in the elasticity or diameter of the vessel. The goal of interventions is to decrease incidence and reduce complications by identifying and minimizing the primary causes. This paper discusses PAD affecting the aortoiliac, common femoral, and femoropopliteal arteries. In a significant portion of the population, PAD may lack usual symptoms such as limb pain, claudication, and diminished pulses. Imaging techniques become crucial to ensuring timely diagnosis, monitoring treatment effectiveness, and preventing recurrence. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a cheap and non-invasive preliminary technique to detect atherosclerotic plaques and grade arterial stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) provides the added advantage of minimizing artifacts. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard for grading the degree of stenosis but is only employed second-line to DUS or MRA due to the high dose of nephrotoxic contrast. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is able to overcome the anatomical limitations of DUS and MRA and proves to be a suitable alternative to DSA in patients with renal disease. Preventative measures involve monitoring blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and tobacco usage. First-line treatment options include endovascular procedures as well as surgical interventions in cases of significant arterial involvement. Endovascular treatments involve the use of balloon angioplasty, drug-coated balloons, and drug-coated stents, to name a few, that serve as minimally invasive techniques to manage PAD. Surgical procedures, although more complex, are considered gold-standard treatment options for long and intricate lesions. Endovascular methods are generally preferred over surgical options as the complication risk is severely reduced and the rates of reintervention are comparable to surgical options.

Midterm results of kissing stent reconstruction of the aortoiliac bifurcation

Purpose

One subset of peripheral arterial disease is aortoiliac occlusive diseases (AIOD). AIOD is the term for all arterial lesions between the infrarenal distal aorta and common femoral artery. Implantation of kissing stents (KS) with covered stents (CS), bare-metal stents (BMS) is one of the endovascular treatment (ET) modalities for AIOD involving aortic bifurcation. In this study, we report the outcomes of the KS technique in infrarenal AIOD.

Methods

Between January 2014 and September 2017, 31 patients who underwent ET were treated with KS technique either with balloon-expandable BMS or balloon-expandable CS. Technical details, clinical success, complications, and patency at follow-up were documented.

Results

The majority of patients were male (77.4%), and the median age was 62 years (range, 45-78 years). All patients were classified according to the TASC II criteria. Eight patients (25.8%) were classified as TASC B. Fifteen patients (48.4%) were classified as TASC C, and 8 patients (25.8%) were classified as TASC D. These 23 patients were classified as complex AIOD group. BMS was used in 17 patients (54.8%), and CS was used in 14 patients (45.2%). Technical and clinical success was achieved in 100% of treated cases. The median follow-up was 24 months (range, 24-34 months). Primary patency rates at 12, 18, and 24 months after ET were 100%, 96.8%, and 90.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

We found that the KS technique has satisfying 24-month results, even in complex AIOD lesions, with high technical success and acceptable midterm patency. Key Words: Aorta, Arterial occlusive diseases, Endovascular procedures, Iliac artery, Stents.

Patient doses in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment

OBJECTIVES

Constantly increasing number of procedures performed - endovascular or hybrid in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease during the last decades finds its explanation in the lower morbidity and mortality rates, compared to bypass surgery. The purpose of the current survey was to estimate patients' radiation exposure in aortoiliac segment after endovascular or hybrid revascularization and to study the main factors which have direct contribution.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 285 procedures conducted with the help of a mobile C-arm system in 223 patients was performed. Procedures were grouped according to criteria such as: type of intervention, vascular access, level of complexity and operating team. Different analyses were performed within the groups and dose values.

RESULTS

The median values of kerma-air product (KAP), the number of series and the peak skin dose (PSD) significantly increase with the increasing number of vascular accesses: for one access (16.68 Gy.cm², 6 and 336 mGy), for two (56.93 Gy.cm², 11 and 545 mGy), and for three (102.28 Gy.cm², 15 and 781 mGy). Significant dependence was observed in the case of single access site between the type of access and the dose values: hybrid and retrograde common femoral artery/superficial femoral artery (CFA/SFA) endovascular accesses, 10.06 Gy.cm²/301 mGy and 13.23 Gy.cm²/318 mGy respectively, in contrast with the contralateral CFA and left brachial access, 33 Gy.cm²/421 mGy and 38.33 Gy.cm²/448 mGy respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that the most important factors increasing the dose values are number and type of vascular accesses, followed by the combination and number of implanted stents with the complexity of the procedure. The PSD values for a single procedure were between 2 and 12 times lower than those IAEA proposed as trigger levels for radiation-induced erythema. This study shows that trigger levels were not reached even for patients with repeated procedures in the same segment in 1-year period.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The study gives important understanding and clarity on the growing awareness for dose-modifying factors during endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment.

Long-term results of endovascular reconstruction for aortoiliac occlusive disease

Background

Open surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Endovascular therapy has emerged as an attractive alternative for AIOD due to its minimal invasiveness. The aims of the present study were to investigate the long-term patency of endovascular treatment and to compare the outcomes of Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) A/B and C/D lesions.

Methods

Patients with AIOD (n=156) were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Patency rates were assessed at 12, 36, and 60 months after the procedure. Parameters for comparisons between TASC II A/B and C/D lesions included primary patency, secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), the technical success rate, the rate of complications, and risk factors for in-stent restenosis.

Results

For all patients, the technical success rate was 98.7%, the complication rate was 4.5%, and the mean follow-up period was 35.7 months. At 12, 36, and 60 months after the procedure, the primary patency rates were 96.5%, 88.3%, and 80.4%, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 99%, 96.4%, and 88%, respectively. The rates of freedom from TLR were 97.5%, 91.6%, and 89.6%. No significant differences were observed between A/B and C/D lesions in terms of primary patency (P=0.443), secondary patency (P=0.393), or freedom from TLR (P=0.481).

Conclusions

Endovascular reconstruction is effective and safe for AIOD, and should be the first-line treatment option for patients with TASC II A-D aortoiliac lesions.

Midterm Outcomes on Primary Endovascular Treatment of 395 Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease Patients: A Single-Center Experience

We report the results of endovascular treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) A&B, TASC C, and TASC D aortoiliac lesions in a single vascular center. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we analyzed 395 patients (mean age 61.2 ± 9.0; 359 men) between January 2015 and December 2017. Technical success was achieved in 96.5%; in-hospital mortality was 1.2% (n = 5). Median follow-up was 36 months (range 24-49 months). After 1 and 5 years, the primary patency rates were 99% and 85% for TASC A&B, 90%, and 78% for TASC C, and 90% and 74% for TASC D. Secondary patency rates were 99% and 90% for TASC A&B, 98% and 65% for TASC C, and 97% and 65% for TASC D. Previous peripheral revascularization (hazard ratio: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.01-3.08, P = .04) was associated with decreased primary patency along with lower age, TASC C, and TASC D class. This analysis reported the acceptable effectiveness and safety of stenting for all types of aortoiliac occlusive disease in a modern setting, with few complications and excellent long-term primary and secondary patency rates.

Outcomes Analysis of Surgical Conversion for Kissing-Stent Occlusion

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the operative outcomes following open aortoiliac/femoral graft reconstruction for bilateral kissing-stent (KS) occlusion.

METHODS

This is a bicentric, retrospective, observational cohort study. Between September 2007 and December 2019, 205 patients were treated with KS for aortoiliac reconstruction. Only those who had bilateral KS occlusion with subsequent aortoiliac/femoral graft replacement were included in this analysis. Primary outcomes were early (<30 days) and late survival, postoperative (<30 days) complications, and patency rates.

RESULTS

Nine patients (male, n = 7) were analyzed. The patient's mean age was 60 ± 5 years (range 55-62). Median delay from initial KS procedure was 36 months (interquartile range [IQR] 19-252). On admission, all patients presented with a worse Rutherford class compared to their initial pre-KS clinical presentation. Aortobifemoral bypass was performed in 5 patients, and aortobi-iliac reconstruction in 4 patients. There were no perioperative deaths and only 1 new case of erectile dysfunction occurred. At a median follow-up time of 24 months (IQR 12-54), primary patency rate was 88.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Open aortic reconstruction after KS occlusion was feasible and effective. Endovascular repair for aortoiliac obstructive disease may be pursued as first-line treatment even in complex lesions.

Successful Resection of a Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Primary Leiomyosarcoma with Atrial Thrombus Extension in a 30-Week Pregnant Woman

Leiomyosarcomas are an uncommon malignant subset of tumors accounting for approximately 20% of soft tissue sarcomas. Primary vascular leiomyosarcomas (PVLs) are a rare subset of leiomyosarcomas that may originate in the arterial or venous circulation but most commonly affect the inferior vena cava (IVC). PVLs more commonly affect women to men in a 2:1 ratio and most frequently occur in the fourth to sixth decades of life. Few reports have described this infrequent pathologic state in the setting of advanced pregnancy. Presented is a case of a 44-year-old 30-week pregnant woman who presented with a PVL of the retrohepatic IVC, which was complicated by occlusion of the IVC and tumor thrombus extension into the hepatic veins and right atrium. Herein, we describe our multidisciplinary management of this rare problem with successful surgical resection of her tumor and IVC reconstruction.

Meta-analysis of direct surgical versus endovascular revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of good-quality evidence comparing direct surgical (DS) with endovascular/hybrid (EVH) revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of studies comparing DS and EVH revascularization for AIOD.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing DS and EVH revascularization for AIOD from 2000 to 2018. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Demographics, clinical presentation, and comorbidities of the two groups were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves from selected studies were digitized with WebPlotDigitizer. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager, and outcome measures were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed for primary patency in the EVH group.

RESULTS

Eleven observational studies were identified comparing a sample of 4030 patients. The median Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score was 19 of 24. A total of 1679 and 2351 patients underwent DS and EVH techniques, respectively. No significant difference was found between means for sex, claudication, rest pain, tissue loss, preoperative ankle-brachial pressure index, and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D lesions in the two groups averaged across studies. However, the DS group had significantly younger patients (average age, 61.83 vs 66.77; P = .0011). The risk factors of the two groups, such as smoking, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal failure, and chronic lung disease, were comparable. Average hospital stay was significantly higher for the DS group (7.76 days vs 3.12 days; P = .025). Change in ankle-brachial pressure index, 30-day mortality, and 30-day graft/stent thrombosis were not significantly different for the groups. Overall, primary patency for a median follow-up of 50 months favored the DS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.73; P = .0002). There was moderate heterogeneity among studies (I² = 46%). The HR for the subgroup for which endovascular procedures were combined with common femoral endarterectomy was 0.43 compared with 0.88 for endovascular revascularization alone. Limb salvage was similar in both groups (HR, 1.10; CI, 0.74-1.64; P = .63), but overall survival after the procedure favored the DS group (HR, 0.75; CI, 0.60-0.94; P = .01; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-quality studies showed that DS revascularization had significantly better primary patency than EVH revascularization for AIOD, although DS patients were younger and may have differed on other confounding variables. Both techniques had similar limb salvage rates, and the primary patency was better for endovascular revascularization combined with common femoral endarterectomy than for endovascular revascularization alone.

Outcomes From the Multicenter Italian Registry on Primary Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Purpose: To report the results of endovascular treatment of iliac and complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in a multicenter Italian registry. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study analyzed 713 patients (mean age 68±10 years; 539 men) with isolated iliac and complex aortoiliac lesions treated with primary stenting between January 2015 and December 2017. Indications for treatment were claudication in 406 (57%) patients and critical limb ischemia in 307 (43%). According to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC) classification, the lesions were categorized as type A (104, 15%), type B (171, 24%), type C (170, 24%), and type D (268, 37%). Early (<30 days) endpoints included mortality, thrombosis, and major complications. Late major outcomes were primary and secondary patency and freedom from reintervention as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; estimates are given with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Associations between baseline variables and primary patency were sought with multivariate analysis; the results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Results: Technical success was achieved in 708 (99%) lesions; in-hospital mortality was 0.6% (n=4). The median follow-up was 11 months (range 0-42). The estimated primary patency rate was 96% (95% CI 94% to 97%) at 1 year and 94% (95% CI 91% to 96%) at 2 years. The estimated secondary patency was 99% (95% CI 97% to 99%) at 1 year and 98% (95% CI 95% to 99%) at 2 years. The estimated freedom from reintervention was 98% (95% CI 96% to 99%) at 1 year and 97% (95% CI 94% to 98.5%) at 2 years. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the application of a covered stent was associated with an increased need for reintervention (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.74, p=0.005). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with decreased primary patency (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.25 to 10.8, p=0.018). Conclusion: Endovascular intervention with primary stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease achieved satisfactory 2-year patency regardless of the complexity of the lesion. Almost all TASC lesions should be considered for primary endovascular intervention if suitable.

Remote iliac artery endarterectomy with selective stent use at the proximal dissection zone in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D lesions

BACKGROUND

Remote iliac artery endarterectomy (RIAE) is a challenging technique in the treatment of arterial occlusive disease. The impact of proximal transection zone stenting on patency rates is still unclear.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RIAE in our hospital between March 2007 and October 2017. A stent was used in cases with a dissection flap or a stenosis at the proximal transection zone after RIAE. In all other cases, we did not use a stent. Study end points were patency rates, limb salvage, and survival after 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 115 RIAEs performed in 108 patients. All lesions were TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C (61.7%) or D (38.3%) lesions. The median follow-up time was 38.5 months (range, 0-117 months). The indications were claudication in 67.0% and critical limb ischemia in 33.0%. Group 1 (n = 56) included all patients without a stent; group 2 (n = 59) included all patients with stenting of the proximal dissection zone. Risk factors were similar between the groups. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates between the groups were not significantly different. The primary patency rate was 81.6% (group 1, 76.2%; group 2, 87.6%; P = .286), the primary assisted patency rate was 91.9% (group 1, 94.0%; group 2, 90.0%; P = .512), and the secondary patency rate was 93.8% (group 1, 94.0%; group 2, 91.6%; P = .435) after 5 years. Limb salvage (97.2%; group 1, 100%; group 2, 94.5%; P = .084) and survival time (57.1%; group 1, 66.7%; group 2, 43.5%; P = .170) were also not significantly different between the groups. A restenosis at the transection zone occurred in 14.3% in group 1 and 1.7% in group 2 (P = .013) during follow-up. A newly formed occlusion of the hypogastric artery was seen in 5.2% of patients after RIAE.

CONCLUSIONS

RIAE is a safe procedure with excellent patency rates. However, the restenosis rate is higher in cases without stenting.

Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data After Kissing Stent Treatment for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate short- and long-term technical and clinical outcomes after kissing stent treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) based on an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the Scopus database identified 156 articles on KS treatment of AIOD; of these 22 met the inclusion criteria. Authors of 19 articles with contact information were approached to join an IPD consortium. Eight author groups responded and 5 provided anonymized data for merging into an IPD database. The number of included procedures was equal before and after 2005. The primary study outcome was the cumulative patency at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were patency at up to 60 months, complications, and changes in Rutherford category and ankle-brachial index. The predictive value of stent protrusion length, pre-/postdilation, stent type, and patient demographics on primary patency were examined with Cox proportional hazard modeling; outcomes are reported as the hazard ratio (HR). The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to estimate patency rates.

RESULTS

In total, 605 (40.9%) of 1480 patients presented in the literature were included in the IPD analysis. The indication for intervention was intermittent claudication in 84.2% and critical limb ischemia in 15.8%. Lesions were classified as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A or B in 52.8% and TASC C and D in 47.2%. The overall primary patency estimate was 81% at 24 months. Primary patency significantly increased after 2005 (p=0.005). Cox regression analysis revealed only age as a significant predictor of sustained primary patency (HR 0.60, p<0.005). Any previous endovascular intervention (HR 2.52, p=0.02) was the main predictor for loss of secondary patency; history of cardiovascular disease (HR 0.27, p=0.04) was the main predictor of sustained secondary patency.

CONCLUSION

The kissing stent technique has a good safety profile and acceptable patency rates up to 2 years, even in TASC C and D lesions, supporting an endovascular-first approach for AIOD.

Stent Protrusion >20 mm Into the Aorta: A New Predictor for Restenosis After Kissing Stent Reconstruction of the Aortoiliac Bifurcation

Purpose: To determine the long-term patency of aortoiliac kissing stents and to identify predisposing factors for the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 105 patients (median age 60.9 years; 64 women) with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease who had kissing stents implanted between 2001 and 2015. The indication for kissing stents was severe claudication in 91 (86.7%) patients and critical limb ischemia in 14 (13.3%). Lesions were TASC A in 52 (49.5%), B in 29 (27.6%), C in 4 (3.8%), and D in 20 (19%) patients. Twenty-five (23.8%) patients had heavily calcified lesions. In all, 210 stents were deployed [180 (85.7%) self-expanding and 30 (14.3%) balloon-expandable]. Follow-up included clinical evaluation, ankle-brachial index measurement, and duplex ultrasonography. Results: The median follow-up was 45 months. The primary patency rates were 93%, 86%, and 77% at 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Significant ISR developed in 23 (21.9%) patients (12 unilateral and 11 bilateral). Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed older age [hazard ratio (HR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.81, p=0.004] and larger aortic diameter (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.7, p<0.001) to be variables favoring long-term patency, while a longer aortic stent segment (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.09, p=0.003) and a larger discrepancy between the summed stent diameters and the aortic diameter (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.65, p=0.043) were associated with ISR development. Multivariate analysis showed a longer aortic stent segment to be the only significant determinant of ISR (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.01, p=0.035). Conclusion: The kissing stent technique can be performed with good long-term patency. Patients whose iliac stents protrude too far into the aorta need closer follow-up.

Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)

Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT).

Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by vascular surgeons at multiple medical centers in Japan.

Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.7%. Primary patency rates were 86% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Univariate analysis showed that critical limb ischemia (Rutherford class 4–6), vein graft, and superficial femoral artery occlusion were significantly associated with low primary patency. In multivariate analysis, only critical limb ischemia influenced primary patency. The secondary patency rate was 87% at both 5 and 8 years. The limb salvage rate was 98% at both 5 and 8 years. The overall survival rates were 71% at 5 years and 49% at 8 years.

Conclusion: The long-term results of CB were good in our study, compared with previous reports. Our results suggest that CB remains an option for the arterial reconstruction in unilateral iliac occlusive disease after EVT failed.

Endovascular Reconstruction for Chronic Infrarenal Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

According to the 2007 TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) guidelines, surgery is the preferred treatment for extensive (TASC II type C and D) aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Recent studies, however, have shown that endovascular management can be an effective first-line treatment option for TASC II type C and D categories. While endovascular therapy is now commonly performed in patients with TASC II type D lesions, very few studies have investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of extending endovascular therapy to the most severe subcategory of TASC II D lesions, chronic infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion (CIAO). Herein, we present our technique for endovascular treatment of CIAO which relies on bidirectional subintimal aortoiliac dissection, wire snare for true lumen reentry, and combined balloon-expandable and self-expanding covered stent reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation and bilateral iliac arteries. This technique safely extends the reach of endovascular therapy to the most severe subcategory of TASC II D AIOD, CIAO. It is a viable minimally invasive alternative to aortobifemoral bypass surgery. Long-term follow-up of larger cohorts is needed to verify clinical efficacy and durability of therapy.

Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions of TASC II type C and D compared with TASC II type A and B in Korea

Objective

To compare the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of endovascular treatment for TASC-II type C/D femoropopliteal lesion compared with TASC-II type A/B femoropopliteal lesion in Korea.

Methods

A total of 179 limbs [TASC-II A/B femoropopliteal lesion (group I, n = 105 limbs) and TASC-II C/D (group II, n = 74 limbs)] were retrospectively analyzed from patients who underwent angioplasty with or without primary stent implantation between February 2008 and November 2012 at two medical centers in South Korea. The major adverse limb event was defined as a composite of target lesion revascularization, symptom relapse with abnormal ankle brachial index, and major amputation.

Results

Immediate procedural success rates were not significantly different (96.2% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.450). Although major adverse limb event, mainly driven by symptom relapse with abnormal ankle brachial index, were significantly higher in group II ( p = 0.013), the incidence of major amputation was very low and similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Even though there were higher incidences of overall procedural complication and major adverse limb event, the technical success rate of endovascular treatment for TASC-II C/D femoropopliteal lesion was comparable to endovascular treatment for TASC-II A/B FPL without an increase in major procedural complications or serious clinical events during follow-up.

Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Therapy for Aortoiliac TASC D Lesions

Background:

Although there is increasing evidence of the effectiveness of endovascular therapy for complex aortoiliac (AI) occlusive disease, it is not universally applied to TASC D lesions.

Methods:

A total of 2096 patients, 2601 limbs with AI occlusive disease, were enrolled. The lesions were categorized as TASC D (395) or TASC A-C (2206), and we compared baseline data, procedure, and follow-up result between the 2 groups.

Results:

The success rate of the procedure was significantly lower in the TASC D group (91.6% vs 99.3%, P < .01), and more procedure complications occurred in the TASC D group (11.1% vs 5.2%, P < .01). The results of a 5-year follow-up revealed no significant difference in primary patency (77.9% vs 77.1%, P = .17) and major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACLE; 30.5% vs 33.4%, P = .42) between the 2 groups. A multivariate analysis revealed complications and critical limb ischemia are independent predictors of MACLE in the TASC D group.

Conclusion:

The success rate of the procedure was lower in the TASC D group. Complications were more frequent in the TASC D group, and they were related to MACLE.

A comparison between aortobifemoral bypass and aortoiliac kissing stents in patients with complex aortoiliac obstructive disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare early and late results of aortobifemoral bypass and endovascular recanalization with the kissing stent technique in the management of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D lesions in the aortoiliac district in a multicenter study.

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2013, 210 open and endovascular interventions for TASC II class C and D aortoiliac obstructive lesions were performed at three Italian teaching hospitals. In all the cases, the intervention was performed for aortic and bilateral iliac involvement. An aortobifemoral bypass was performed in 82 patients (group 1); in the remaining 128, an endovascular recanalization with the kissing stent technique was carried out (group 2). Early results in the two groups were compared with the χ² test. Follow-up results were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate (forward Cox regression) analysis to identify potentially significant predictors of primary patency in the whole study group was performed.

RESULTS

Patients in group 2 were more frequently female and more frequently had diabetes and arterial hypertension than patients in group 1. The indication for surgical intervention was the presence of critical limb ischemia in 29 cases in group 1 (35%) and in 31 cases in group 2 (24%; P = .07). Technical success in group 2 was 98.5%; two patients required immediate conversion to open surgery for iliac rupture. There was one perioperative death in group 1 (mortality rate, 1%; P = .2 in comparison with group 2). Four perioperative thromboses occurred, two in group 1 and two in group 2 (in one case requiring conversion to open surgical intervention), and no amputations at 30 days were recorded. Cumulative postoperative local and systemic complications occurred in 17 patients in group 1 (20.5%) and in 9 patients in group 2 (7%; P < .001). Mean duration of follow-up was 38 months (range, 1-96 months). Survival rates at 6 years were 65.5% (standard error [SE], 0.08) in group 1 and 83.5% (SE, 0.08) in group 2 (P = .08; log-rank, 2.2). At the same time interval, primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were similar; reintervention rates were 6% in group 1 (SE, 0.05) and 11% in group 2 (SE, 0.04; P = .3; log-rank, 0.8). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that only the presence of critical limb ischemia was independently associated with poorer primary patency during follow-up (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-6.4; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter experience, endovascular repair of aortoiliac complex lesions with the kissing stent technique provided similar satisfactory early and late results to those obtained with open surgery.

Strategies for managing aortoiliac occlusions: access, treatment and outcomes

Treatment of severe aortoiliac disease has dramatically evolved from a dependence on open aortobifemoral grafting to hybrid and endovascular only approaches. Open surgery has been the gold standard treatment of severe aortoiliac disease with excellent patency rates, but with increased length of stay and major complications. In contrast, endovascular interventions can successfully treat almost any lesion with decreased risk, compared to open surgery. Although primary patency rates remain inferior, secondary endovascular interventions are often minor procedures resulting in comparable long-term outcomes. The risks of renal insufficiency, embolization and access complications are not insignificant; however, most can be prevented or managed without significant clinical consequence. Endovascular therapies should be considered a first-line treatment option for all patients with aortoiliac disease, especially those with high-risk cardiovascular comorbidities.

The EPIC nitinol stent system in the treatment of iliac artery lesions: one-year results from the ORION clinical trial

PURPOSE

To report the 1-year results of a pivotal study for a new-generation nitinol stent for the treatment of iliac atherosclerotic lesions.

METHODS

The ORION trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00896337) was a single-arm, non-randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial that enrolled 125 patients (81 men; mean age 61.1±9.3 years) implanted with the EPIC self-expanding nitinol stent system in 166 de novo or restenotic iliac artery lesions ≤13 cm long. The primary endpoint was the 9-month major adverse event rate [i.e., device- or procedure-related death within 30 days, myocardial infarction during the index hospitalization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), or index limb amputation]. Follow-up occurred at hospital discharge and at 1, 9, and 12 months. An independent core laboratory evaluated ultrasound results at 1, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint met the prespecified performance goal, with only 3.4% (4/117) of patients experiencing a major adverse event by 9 months (p<0.0001). By 12 months, 6 (5.4%) of 111 patients had TVR; none had an index limb amputation. The ankle-brachial index, Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and Rutherford classifications all showed sustained improvements through 12 months. Primary patency was 94.4% with comparable results for lesions classified as complex (TASC II C/D 95.5%) or non-complex (TASC II A/B 95.0%).

CONCLUSION

The EPIC stent system demonstrated safety and effectiveness through 12 months, including improvements for complex lesions. The EPIC stent is a viable alternative to surgery for patients with either complex or non-complex lesions.

Overview of classification systems in peripheral artery disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD), secondary to atherosclerotic disease, is currently the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. While PAD is common, it is estimated that the majority of patients with PAD are undiagnosed and undertreated. The challenge to the treatment of PAD is to accurately diagnose the symptoms and determine treatment for each patient. The varied presentations of peripheral vascular disease have led to numerous classification schemes throughout the literature. Consistent grading of patients leads to both objective criteria for treating patients and a baseline for clinical follow-up. Reproducible classification systems are also important in clinical trials and when comparing medical, surgical, and endovascular treatment paradigms. This article reviews the various classification systems for PAD and advantages to each system.

Long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac bifurcation lesions in the real-AI registry

PURPOSE

To report long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for aortoiliac bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the multicenter REtrospective AnaLysis of Aorto-Iliac stenting (REAL-AI) registry in Japan were pooled. Of 2096 patients who underwent EVT for de novo aortoiliac disease between January 2005 and December 2009, 190 patients (148 men; mean age 70±9 years) had aortoiliac bifurcation lesions that were treated with stents, whose configuration (single, V, or kissing) and type (balloon-expandable or self-expanding) were subjected to regression analysis to determine any impact on primary patency along with other demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics, including Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C/D classification. The primary endpoints were restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, major cardiovascular events, and major cardiovascular + limb events.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 6.3%, and 1- and 5-year primary patency rates were 87% and 73%, respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 31±15 months, there were 36 (19.0%) restenoses, 22 (11.6%) TLRs, and 4 (2.1%) reocclusions; stent fracture (2, 1.1%) and major amputation (2, 1.1%) were rare. Only female gender [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 4.26, 95% CI 1.89 to 9.71, p<0.001] and residual diameter stenosis (AHR 1.04, 96% CI 1.01 to 1.06, p=0.01) were independent predictors of primary patency.

CONCLUSION

Stenting for aortoiliac bifurcation lesions was found to be safe and effective. Neither stent configuration nor type appeared to affect vessel patency in true bifurcation lesions.

Role of the latest endovascular technology in the treatment of intermittent claudication

Intermittent claudication is a serious symptom in patients with peripheral arterial disease, and severely limits activities of daily living. Conservative treatment (optimal medical therapy and exercise rehabilitation programs) and revascularization procedures (endovascular treatment [EVT] or open bypass surgery) can relieve intermittent claudication. Among these treatment options, EVT has developed dramatically during the past decade, and has enabled physicians to offer less invasive treatment options with increasing durability. EVT for aortoiliac lesions has matured, and its long-term patency now approaches that of open bypass surgery. The latest EVT technologies include drug-eluting stents, stent grafts, drug-coated balloons, and bioresorbable stents. The recently reported patency of stent grafts in the femoropopliteal lesions was comparable with that of the prosthetic bypass graft. In the course of the paradigm shift from bypass surgery to EVT, evidence of any long-term benefit of EVT compared with supervised exercise is still inconclusive. EVT could improve walking performance in the short-term, while supervised exercise could improve walking performance more efficiently in the long-term. Combined treatment with EVT and exercise may offer the most sustainable and effective symptom relief. This paper reviews the relevant literature on the treatment of intermittent claudication, focusing on the latest EVT technologies, and outlines a strategy for achieving long-term benefits.