Influenza vaccination in pediatric age

How does one choose the appropriate pharmacotherapy for children with lower respiratory tract infections?

INTRODUCTION

The definition of acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) includes any infection involving the respiratory tract below the level of the larynx. In children, the most common acute LRTIs, and those with the greatest clinical relevance, are community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), bronchiolitis, bronchitis and tuberculosis (TB). The clinical relevance of LRTIs implies that they must be addressed with the most effective therapy. Antibiotics and antivirals play an essential role in this regard.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, the most recent advances in the drug treatment of LRTIs in children are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Although LRTIs are extremely common and one of the most important causes of hospitalization and death in children, anti-infective therapy for these diseases remains unsatisfactory. For CAP and BR, the most important problem is the overuse and misuse of antibiotics; for BCL, the lack of drugs with demonstrated efficacy, safety and tolerability; for TB, the poor knowledge on the true efficacy and safety of the new drugs specifically planned to overcome the problem of MDR M. tuberculosis strains. There is still a long way to go for the therapy of pediatric LRTIs to be considered satisfactory.

Vaccination against Paediatric Respiratory Pathogens

Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are extremely common in children, especially those under 5 years old. They can lead to complications, super-infection, respiratory failure, and even compromised respiratory function in adulthood. For some of the responsible pathogens, vaccines are available. This review reports current issues about vaccines against the main respiratory pathogens to highlight the available strategies to reduce the burden of paediatric respiratory disease. The optimal use of influenza, pneumococcal, pertussis and measles vaccines is required in order to reduce ARI burden. Vaccination coverage rates must be improved to achieve the full benefits of these vaccines. Recently, advances in the knowledge of respiratory syncytial virus structural biology and immunology as well as the development of new techniques to generate vaccine candidates have increased the number of promising vaccines even against this harmful pathogen.

Influenza immunization policies: Which could be the main reasons for differences among countries?

Despite the availability of effective prophylactic and therapeutic measures, influenza remains one of the most important infectious disease threats to the human population. Every year, seasonal influenza epidemics infect up to 30% of the population; a relevant portion of the ill are hospitalized, and more than a marginal number die. In an attempt to reduce the medical, social and economic burden of influenza, vaccines are recommended by many health authorities worldwide. However, not all countries have a national program for influenza immunization. The main aim of this paper is to list the differences among influenza immunization policies of various countries, highlighting the most important scientific reasons that may have led health authorities to make different decisions. The manuscript highlights that national influenza immunization policies can vary significantly from country to country. These differences arise from insufficient evidence of the relevance of influenza infection from a clinical, social and economic point of view. The lack of precise data on the true frequency and clinical relevance of influenza infection makes it nearly impossible to establish the economic burden of influenza. Moreover, it remains very difficult to evaluate the efficacy of the different influenza vaccines and whether their use is cost-effective considering the various types of people receiving them and the indirect advantages. Disparities among countries will be overcome only when more reliable data regarding all these aspects of influenza infection, particularly those related to the true impact of the disease, are precisely defined.

Severe influenza in children: incidence and risk factors

INTRODUCTION

The identification of factors that can predispose to the development of severe influenza is essential to enable the implementation of optimal prevention and control measures for vulnerable populations.

AREAS COVERED

Unfortunately, data in the pediatric age group remain difficult to interpret. However, epidemiological data seem to suggest that the most severe influenza cases, those who are hospitalized, those who are admitted to the intensive care unit, and those who died, occur in children in the first 2 years of life and in school age patients. Expert commentary: Immaturity of the immune system, and in particular of the mechanisms that usually recognize influenza viruses and activate cytokine and chemokine responses to reduce viral replication, might explain the high hospitalization rate observed in the youngest patients. Some underlying chronic conditions favour the development of the severe cases, sometime leading to death, although both admission to the intensive care unit and death can occur in otherwise healthy subjects.

Oseltamivir for influenza infection in children: risks and benefits

Influenza is a common disease affecting many children each year. In a number of cases, particularly in children <2 years old and in those with severe chronic underlying disease, influenza can be complicated by lower respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media, rhinosinusitis, febrile seizures, dehydration or encephalopathy. Oseltamivir is the influenza virus drug that is most commonly studied in children for both the treatment and prevention of influenza. To avoid the risk that children with mild influenza or patients suffering from different viral infections receive oseltamivir, oseltamivir treatment should be recommended only in severe influenza cases, especially if confirmed by reliable laboratory tests. However, therapy must be initiated considering the risk of complications and the presence of severe clinical manifestations at age- and weight-appropriate doses. Because the vaccine remains the best option for preventing influenza and its complications, prophylaxis using oseltamivir should only be considered in select patients.