Weighing in on molecular anchors: the role of ankyrin polypeptides in human arrhythmia

Common human ANK2 variant confers in vivo arrhythmia phenotypes

BACKGROUND

Human ANK2 (ankyrin-B) loss-of-function variants are directly linked with arrhythmia phenotypes. However, in atypical non-ion channel arrhythmia genes such as ANK2 that lack the same degree of robust structure/function and clinical data, it may be more difficult to assign variant disease risk based simply on variant location, minor allele frequency, and/or predictive structural algorithms. The human ankyrin-B p.L1622I variant found in arrhythmia probands displays significant diversity in minor allele frequency across populations.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to directly test the in vivo impact of ankyrin-B p.L1622I on cardiac electrical phenotypes and arrhythmia risk using a new animal model.

METHODS

We tested arrhythmia phenotypes in a new "knock-in" animal model harboring the human ankyrin-B p.L1622I variant.

RESULTS

Ankyrin-B p.L1622I displays reduced posttranslational expression in vivo, resulting in reduced cardiac ankyrin-B expression and reduced association with binding-partner Na/Ca exchanger. Ankyrin-B(L1622I/L1622I) mice display changes in heart rate, atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction, and alterations in repolarization. Furthermore, ankyrin-B(L1622I/L1622I) mice display catecholamine-dependent arrhythmias. At the cellular level, ankyrin-B(L1622I/L1622I) myocytes display increased action potential duration and severe arrhythmogenic afterdepolarizations that provide a mechanistic rationale for the arrhythmias.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support in vivo arrhythmogenic phenotypes of an ANK2 variant with unusual frequency in select populations. On the basis of our findings and current clinical data, we support classification of p.L1622I as a "mild" loss-of-function variant that may confer arrhythmia susceptibility in the context of secondary risk factors including environment, medication, and/or additional genetic variation.

Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Prolong Cardiac Repolarization through Transcriptional Mechanisms

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are an emerging class of anticancer agents that modify gene expression by altering the acetylation status of lysine residues of histone proteins, thereby inducing transcription, cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and cell death or apoptosis of cancer cells. In the clinical setting, treatment with HDAC inhibitors has been associated with delayed cardiac repolarization and in rare instances a lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmia known as torsades de pointes. The mechanism(s) of HDAC inhibitor-induced effects on cardiac repolarization is unknown. We demonstrate that administration of structurally diverse HDAC inhibitors to dogs causes delayed but persistent increases in the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc), an in vivo measure of cardiac repolarization, at timepoints far removed from the Tmax for parent drug and metabolites. Transcriptional profiling of ventricular myocardium from dogs treated with various HDAC inhibitors demonstrated effects on genes involved in protein trafficking, scaffolding and insertion of various ion channels into the cell membrane as well as genes for specific ion channel subunits involved in cardiac repolarization. Extensive in vitro ion channel profiling of various structural classes of HDAC inhibitors (and their major metabolites) by binding and acute patch clamp assays failed to show any consistent correlations with direct ion channel blockade. Drug-induced rescue of an intracellular trafficking-deficient mutant potassium ion channel, hERG (G601S), and decreased maturation (glycosylation) of wild-type hERG expressed by CHO cells in vitro correlated with prolongation of QTc intervals observed in vivo The results suggest that HDAC inhibitor-induced prolongation of cardiac repolarization may be mediated in part by transcriptional changes of genes required for ion channel trafficking and localization to the sarcolemma. These data have broad implications for the development of these drug classes and suggest that the optimal time to assess potentially transcriptionally mediated physiologic effects will be delayed relative to an epigenetic drug's Tmax/Cmax.