Understanding Breathlessness Burden and Psychophysiological Correlates in Asthma

BACKGROUND

Breathlessness is a disabling symptom, with complexity that is often under-recognized and undertreated in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the burden of breathlessness in people with severe compared with mild-to-moderate asthma and identify psychophysiological correlates of breathlessness.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of people with mild-to-severe asthma, who attended 2 in-person visits to complete a multidimensional assessment. The proportion of people with mild-to-moderate versus severe asthma who reported physically limiting breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] dyspnea score ≥2) was compared. Psychophysiological factors associated with breathlessness in people with asthma were identified via a directed acyclic graph and explored with multivariate logistic regression to predict breathlessness.

RESULTS

A total of 144 participants were included, of whom, 74 (51%) had mild-to-moderate asthma and 70 (49%) severe asthma. Participants were predominantly female (n = 103, 72%) with a median (quartile 1, quartile 3) age of 63.4 (50.5, 69.5) years and body mass index (BMI) of 31.3 (26.2, 36.0) kg/m2. The proportion of people reporting mMRC ≥2 was significantly higher in those with severe- (n = 37, 53%) than those with mild-to-moderate (n = 21, 31%) asthma (P = .013). Dyspnoea-12 Total (8.00 [4.75, 17.00] vs 5.00 [2.00, 11.00], P = .037) score was also significantly higher in the severe asthma group. Significant predictors of physically limiting breathlessness were BMI, asthma control, exercise capacity, and hyperventilation symptoms. Airflow limitation and type 2 inflammation were poor breathlessness predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Over half of people with severe asthma experience physically limiting breathlessness despite treatment. Targeting psychophysiological factors, or traits, associated with breathlessness may help relieve this distressing symptom, which is of high priority to people with asthma.

Characterization and inhibition of inflammasome responses in severe and non-severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Increased airway NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β responses may underpin severe neutrophilic asthma. However, whether increased inflammasome activation is unique to severe asthma, is a common feature of immune cells in all inflammatory types of severe asthma, and whether inflammasome activation can be therapeutically targeted in patients, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the activation and inhibition of inflammasome-mediated IL-1β responses in immune cells from patients with asthma.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from patients with non-severe (n = 59) and severe (n = 36 stable, n = 17 exacerbating) asthma and healthy subjects (n = 39). PBMCs were stimulated with nigericin or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone, or in combination (LPS + nigericin), with or without the NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950, and the effects on IL-1β release were assessed.

RESULTS

PBMCs from patients with non-severe or severe asthma produced more IL-1β in response to nigericin than those from healthy subjects. PBMCs from patients with severe asthma released more IL-1β in response to LPS + nigericin than those from non-severe asthma. Inflammasome-induced IL-1β release from PBMCs from patients with severe asthma was not increased during exacerbation compared to when stable. Inflammasome-induced IL-1β release was not different between male and female, or obese and non-obese patients and correlated with eosinophil and neutrophil numbers in the airways. MCC950 effectively suppressed LPS-, nigericin-, and LPS + nigericin-induced IL-1β release from PBMCs from all groups.

CONCLUSION

An increased ability for inflammasome priming and/or activation is a common feature of systemic immune cells in both severe and non-severe asthma, highlighting inflammasome inhibition as a universal therapy for different subtypes of disease.

Sexual dimorphism in chronic respiratory diseases

Sex differences in susceptibility, severity, and progression are prevalent for various diseases in multiple organ systems. This phenomenon is particularly apparent in respiratory diseases. Asthma demonstrates an age-dependent pattern of sexual dimorphism. However, marked differences between males and females exist in other pervasive conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer. The sex hormones estrogen and testosterone are commonly considered the primary factors causing sexual dimorphism in disease. However, how they contribute to differences in disease onset between males and females remains undefined. The sex chromosomes are an under-investigated fundamental form of sexual dimorphism. Recent studies highlight key X and Y-chromosome-linked genes that regulate vital cell processes and can contribute to disease-relevant mechanisms. This review summarises patterns of sex differences in asthma, COPD and lung cancer, highlighting physiological mechanisms causing the observed dimorphism. We also describe the role of the sex hormones and present candidate genes on the sex chromosomes as potential factors contributing to sexual dimorphism in disease.

Oral corticosteroids stewardship for asthma in adults and adolescents: A position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used for asthma treatment. This medication is highly effective for both acute and chronic diseases, but evidence indicates that indiscriminate OCS use is common, posing a risk of serious side effects and irreversible harm. There is now an urgent need to introduce OCS stewardship approaches, akin to successful initiatives that optimized appropriate antibiotic usage. The aim of this TSANZ (Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand) position paper is to review current knowledge pertaining to OCS use in asthma and then delineate principles of OCS stewardship. Recent evidence indicates overuse and over-reliance on OCS for asthma and that doses >1000 mg prednisolone-equivalent cumulatively are likely to have serious side effects and adverse outcomes. Patient perspectives emphasize the detrimental impacts of OCS-related side effects such as weight gain, insomnia, mood disturbances and skin changes. Improvements in asthma control and prevention of exacerbations can be achieved by improved inhaler technique, adherence to therapy, asthma education, smoking cessation, multidisciplinary review, optimized medications and other strategies. Recently, add-on therapies including novel biological agents and macrolide antibiotics have demonstrated reductions in OCS requirements. Harm reduction may also be achieved through identification and mitigation of predictable adverse effects. OCS stewardship should entail greater awareness of appropriate indications for OCS prescription, risk-benefits of OCS medications, side effects, effective add-on therapies and multidisciplinary review. If implemented, OCS stewardship can ensure that clinicians and patients with asthma are aware that OCS should not be used lightly, while providing reassurance that asthma can be controlled in most people without frequent use of OCS.

Transcriptomics of biopsies identifies novel genes and pathways linked to neutrophilic inflammation in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma is a complex disease. Transcriptomic profiling has contributed to understanding the pathogenesis of asthma, especially type-2 inflammation. However, there is still poor understanding of non-type-2 asthma, and consequently, there are limited treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathways in endobronchial biopsies associated with inflammatory phenotypes of severe asthma.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examined endobronchial biopsies from 47 adults with severe asthma (neutrophilic asthma (NA) n = 9, eosinophilic asthma (EA) n = 22 and paucigranulocytic asthma (PGA) n = 16) and 13 healthy controls (HC). RNA was extracted and transcriptomic profiles generated (Illumina Humanref-12 V4) and analysed using GeneSpring GX14.9.1. Pathway identification using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

RESULTS

NA had the most distinct profile, with signature of 60 top-ranked DEGs (FC >±2) including genes associated with innate immunity response, neutrophil degranulation and IL-10 signalling. NA presented enrichment to pathways previously linked to neutrophilic inflammation; dendritic cell maturation, Th1, TREM1, inflammasome, Th17 and p38 MAPK, as well as novel links to neuroinflammation, NFAT and PKCθ signalling. EA presented similar transcriptomic profiles to PGA and HC. Despite the higher proportion of bacterial colonization in NA, no changes were observed in the transcriptomic profiles of severe asthma culture positive compared with severe asthma culture negative.

CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE

NA features a distinct transcriptomic profile with seven pathways enriched in NA compared to EA, PGA and HC. All those with severe asthma had significant enrichment for SUMOylation, basal cell carcinoma signalling and Wnt/β-catenin pathways compared to HC, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. These findings contribute to the understanding of mechanistic pathways in endobronchial biopsies associated with NA and identify potential novel treatment targets for severe asthma.

"It's like being on a roller coaster": the burden of caring for people with severe asthma

Introduction

Family carers and significant others play a fundamental role in the well-being of people with severe asthma. This study aimed to investigate the challenges faced by family carers/significant others of people with severe asthma, to understand if there is an unmet need and to explore coping strategies.

Methods

Carers of people with severe asthma were invited to participate in a face-to-face or telephone interview. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until reaching data saturation of themes. The 20 interviews were recorded and transcribed, and analysis of data followed an inductive thematic approach.

Results

We report three overarching emergent themes: 1) “Caring role impacts”, which centred around the negative and positive impacts of caring on carers' well-being; 2) “Unmet needs”, which encapsulated the support needs participants desired and were categorised into unmet information, biopsychosocial needs and carers' involvement in decision-making; and 3) “Coping strategies”, which were central to the range of tools and positive approaches in dealing with caring demands.

Discussion

Caring for someone with severe asthma can be burdensome and may negatively affect the physical and psychosocial health of the carer. Various coping strategies are used to manage the demands of these caring roles. Carers of people with severe asthma expressed a need for informational, biopsychosocial and involvement in care decision-making support. Tailored support services that are sensitive to their needs may improve their quality of life and encourage healthcare providers to value and acknowledge the important contribution that carers make.

Caring for someone with severe asthma can be burdensome, affecting the physical and psychosocial health of the supportive person negatively. Tailored support services may improve their quality of life.https://bit.ly/2KA9PWS

Imaging for precision medicine: can V-P SPECT measure mepolizumab response in asthma?

Monoclonal antibody therapies are effective for many but not all people with severe asthma. Precision medicine guides treatment selection using biomarkers to select patients most likely to respond according to their inflammatory endotypes. However, when assessing response to treatment, greater precision is required. We report a case series describing treatment response to mepolizumab in four severe asthma patients, assessed by traditional methods and with objective ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V-P SPECT). In this series, patients with severe asthma received mepolizumab treatment with clinical outcomes recorded at commencement and at approximately 16 weeks post-treatment initiation. V-P SPECT imaging was performed before and after treatment to determine ventilation heterogeneity and perfusion, and its ability to assess treatment responsiveness. V-P SPECT shows promise as an objective measure to assess lung ventilation and perfusion to observe and assess responsiveness to mepolizumab. With quantification, this measure may allow better precision in determining treatment improvements.

Severe Asthma Toolkit: an online resource for multidisciplinary health professionals-needs assessment, development process and user analytics with survey feedback

OBJECTIVES

Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on individuals, families and the healthcare system. New treatment and management approaches are emerging as effective options for severe asthma. Translating new knowledge to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals is a priority. We developed 'The Severe Asthma Toolkit' (https://toolkit.severeasthma.org.au) to increase awareness of severe asthma, provide evidence-based resources and support decisionmaking by healthcare providers.

SETTING

Roundtable discussions and a survey of Australians clinicians were conducted to determine clinician preferences, format and content for a severe asthma resource.

PARTICIPANTS

A reference group from stakeholder and consumer bodies and severe asthma experts provided advice and feedback. A multidisciplinary team of international experts was engaged to develop content. Written content was based on up-to-date literature. Peer and editorial review were performed to finalise content and inform web design. Website design focused on user experience, navigation, engagement, interactivity and tailoring of content for a clinical audience.

RESULTS

A web-based resource was developed. Roundtable discussions and a needs assessment survey identified the need for dedicated severe asthma management resources to support skills training. The end-product, which launched 26 March 2018, includes an overview of severe asthma, diagnosis and assessment, management, medications, comorbidities, living with severe asthma, establishing a clinic, paediatrics/adolescents and clinical resources. Analytics indicate access by users worldwide (32 169 users from 169 countries). User survey results (n=394) confirm access by the target audience (72% health professionals), who agreed the toolkit increased their knowledge (73%) and confidence in managing severe asthma (66%), and 75% are likely to use the resource in clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

The Severe Asthma Toolkit is a unique, evidence-based internet resource to support healthcare professionals providing optimal care for people with severe asthma. It is a comprehensive, accessible and independent resource developed by leading severe asthma experts to improve clinician knowledge and skills in severe asthma management.

Targeting treatable traits in severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial

RATIONALE

Treatable traits have been proposed as a new paradigm for airway disease management.

OBJECTIVES

To characterise treatable traits in a severe asthma population and to determine the efficacy of targeting treatments to these treatable traits in severe asthma.

METHODS

Participants (n=140) with severe asthma were recruited to a cross-sectional study and underwent a multidimensional assessment to characterise treatable traits. Eligible participants with severe asthma (n=55) participated in a 16-week parallel-group randomised controlled trial to determine the feasibility and efficacy of management targeted to predefined treatable traits, compared to usual care in a severe asthma clinic. The patient-reported outcome of health-related quality of life was the trial's primary end-point.

MAIN RESULTS

Participants with severe asthma had a mean±sd of 10.44±3.03 traits per person, comprising 3.01±1.54 pulmonary and 4.85±1.86 extrapulmonary traits and 2.58±1.31 behavioural/risk factors. Individualised treatment that targeted the traits was feasible and led to significantly improved health-related quality of life (0.86 units, p<0.001) and asthma control (0.73, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidimensional assessment enables detection of treatable traits and identifies a significant trait burden in severe asthma. Targeting these treatable traits using a personalised-medicine approach in severe asthma leads to improvements in health-related quality of life, asthma control and reduced primary care acute visits. Treatable traits may be an effective way to address the complexity of severe asthma.

Six gene and TH2 signature expression in endobronchial biopsies of participants with asthma

BACKGROUND

Both the six gene signature (6GS: CPA3, DNASE1L3, CLC, IL1B, ALPL, and CXCR2) and T-helper 2 signature (TH2S: CLCA1, SERPINB2, and POSTN) are proposed as biomarkers in the identification of inflammatory phenotypes of asthma in induced sputum and epithelial brushings, respectively. The aim of this study was to explore patterns of gene expression of known signatures, 6GS and TH2S in endobronchial biopsies.

METHODS

This was an exploratory cross-sectional study of gene expression in endobronchial biopsies of 55 adults with asthma and 9 healthy controls (HC). The expression of the 6GS and TH2S was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Correlations with clinical and cellular characteristics were performed, and receiver operating characteristic was utilized to assess signatures' ability to predict asthma from HC and inflammatory phenotypes.

RESULTS

Gene expression of DNASE1L3 (P = .045) was upregulated in asthma compared with HC, and IL1B (P = .017) was upregulated in neutrophilic asthma compared with non-neutrophilic asthma. In asthma, the expression of CPA3 was negatively associated with ICS daily dose (r = -.339; P = .011), IL1B expression was positively associated with bronchial lavage fluid (BLF) total cell count (r = .340; P = .013) and both CLC and POSTN expression were associated with lymphocytes percentage in BLF (r = -.355, P = .009; r = -.300, P = .025, respectively). Both 6GS (area under curve [AUC] = 86.3%; P = .017) and TH2S (AUC = 72.7%; P = .037) could significantly predict asthma from HC. In addition, 6GS can identify neutrophilic (AUC = 93.2%; P = .005) and TH2S identifies eosinophilic (AUC = 62.7%; P = .033) asthma.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There was increased expression of DNASE1L3 in asthma and IL1B in neutrophilic asthma. These results show similar upregulated patterns of expression in two genes of the 6GS in endobronchial biopsies, previously identified in sputum. The upregulation of DNASE1L3 and IL1B suggests that common mechanisms may be at play throughout the airway.

High siRNA loading powder for inhalation prepared by co-spray drying with human serum albumin

The development of small interfering RNA (siRNA) formulation for pulmonary delivery is a key to the clinical translation of siRNA therapeutics for the treatment of respiratory diseases. Most inhalable siRNA powder formulations published to date were limited by the siRNA content which was often too low to be clinically relevant. This study aimed to prepare inhalable siRNA powder formulations that contained high siRNA loading of over 6% w/w by spray drying, with human serum albumin (HSA) investigated as a dispersion enhancer to improve the aerosol performance. The effect of siRNA, HSA and solute concentrations in the formulations were evaluated systemically using factorial analyses. All the spray dried siRNA powders exhibited excellent aerosol performance with fine particle fraction (FPF) consistently over 50% in all the formulations. An enrichment of HSA on the particle surface was observed. Surface corrugation was more prominent as HSA composition increased. Importantly, the bioactivity of siRNA was successfully preserved upon spray drying as demonstrated in the in vitro transfection study, and up to 78% of intact siRNA retained in the spray dried powder. Overall, HSA is an effective dispersion enhancer and spray drying is an appropriate technique to produce inhalable dry powder with high siRNA loading for further investigation.

Living well with severe asthma

Living well with severe asthma can be challenging. People with severe asthma can be refractory to treatment, can experience poor symptom control and are at a heightened risk of death. Patients experience symptoms of shortness of breath, chest tightness, cough and wheeze. These symptoms influence many aspects of an individual's life, resulting in emotional, financial, functional and medication-related burdens that negatively impact quality of life. Quality of life is known to be influenced by individual levels of satisfaction that stem from real-life treatment experiences. This experience is portrayed through the lens of the patient, which is commonly referred to as the patient perspective. The patient perspective is only one element of the patient experience. It influences health status, which, in severe asthma, is commonly assessed using validated health-related quality of life measures. A positive patient perspective may be achieved with implementation of management strategies tailored to individual needs. Management strategies developed in partnership between the patient, the severe asthma multidisciplinary team and the general practitioner may minimise disease-related impairment, allowing patients to live well with severe asthma.

Key points

Despite advances in treatment over the past decade, the experience of living with severe asthma has not significantly improved, with high levels of burden influencing the patient perspective.The impact of severe disease is not only restricted to asthma symptoms and acute attacks. It causes significant emotional, financial, functional and medication-related burdens, leading to impaired health-related quality of life.Clinical outcomes should not be stand-alone measures in severe asthma. Nonclinical measures should also be considered when evaluating health-related quality of life.Disease burden may be minimised and quality of life improved via self-management strategies, including education sessions, written asthma action plans, symptom monitoring, breathing exercises, physical activity and psychotherapeutic interventions.

Educational aims

To demonstrate the importance of the patient perspective in severe asthma.To identify the significant levels of disease burden associated with severe asthma.To discuss quality of life in severe asthma.To outline strategies that increase well-being in severe asthma.

Models of care for severe asthma: the role of primary care

Severe asthma encompasses treatment-refractory asthma and difficult-to-treat asthma. There are a number of barriers in primary, secondary and tertiary settings which compromise optimal care for severe asthma in Australia. Guidelines recommend a multidimensional assessment of severe asthma, which includes confirming the diagnosis, severity and phenotype and identifying and treating comorbidities and risk factors. This approach has been found to improve severe asthma symptoms and quality of life and reduce exacerbations. Primary care providers can contribute significantly to the multidimensional approach for severe asthma by performing spirometry, optimising therapy and addressing risk factors such as non-adherence and smoking before referring the patient to a respiratory physician for review. Primary care practitioners are encouraged to remain engaged with the management of a patient with severe asthma following specialist review by assisting with community-based allied health referrals, managing general medical comorbidities and administering prescribed biological therapies. Specialists can support primary care by providing advice to individuals with indeterminate diagnosis, streamlining investigation and management of unrecognised risk factors and complex comorbidities, optimising treatment for severe or difficult asthma including assessment of suitability for and, if appropriate, initiating advanced therapies such as biological therapies. When discharging patients back to primary care, specialists should provide clear recommendations regarding ongoing management and should specify the indications requiring further specialist review, ideally offering a streamlined re-referral pathway.

Health-related quality of life burden in severe asthma

It is largely unrecognised that the impacts of asthma are different in patients with severe disease compared with patients with mild to moderate disease. Severe asthma is associated with a significant health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden due to excessive symptoms, frequent and life-threatening attacks, increased comorbidity burden, and high pharmacological treatment requirements. Interventions aimed at improving HRQoL need to be specifically tested in populations with severe asthma, including multicomponent interventions targeting the many clinical characteristics associated with the disease. It is necessary to have patient-reported outcome measures developed specifically for severe asthma. Public health messages recognising the significant burden of severe asthma on quality of life are needed.

Appropriate use of oral corticosteroids for severe asthma

Severe asthma represents a significant burden of disease, particularly in high income nations; oral corticosteroids (OCS) remain an important part of the management toolkit for these patients. Corticosteroids are effective at targeting numerous elements of the type 2/eosinophilic inflammatory pathway and lead to both rapid reduction in eosinophilic inflammation and longer term reduction in airway hyper-responsiveness. Resistance or insensitivity to corticosteroids is a feature of severe asthma, with persistent type 2 inflammation often occurring despite regular use of OCS. OCS remain the only accepted, effective treatment for acute asthma, and also continue to play an important role in the long term management of severe asthma, in spite of their significant side effect profile. Even with the availability of the new biological therapies against IgE and interleukin-5, it is likely that a large proportion of patients will continue to require OCS to control their asthma. Future work should focus on optimising the balance between OCS efficacy and safety, and continued development of agents that allow reduction, or ideally discontinuation of their use, is needed.

Monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma: is it worth it?

Background: To date, there is the strong need to compare the efficacy across the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) approved to treat severe asthma. Research design and method: A quantitative synthesis has been performed to compare the impact of omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and placebo on the risk of exacerbation and change in forced expiratory flow in 1 s (FEV₁) in severe asthmatic patients. Results: All the investigated mAbs were more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of exacerbation and improving lung function. Dupilumab showed a general superiority compared to the other mAbs, as it significantly reduced the risk of exacerbation vs. omalizumab, and significantly improved FEV₁ when compared to omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab. The overall-marked placebo effect indicates that a better adherence to drug regimens in the context of RCTs may lead to noteworthy improvement in the clinical condition of severe asthmatic patients. Conclusions: Further extensive meta-analyses are needed to identify the factors influencing the efficacy profile of mAbs in severe asthma. This may also permit to identify the profile of patients that are specifically responsive to either anti-IgE, anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5, or anti-IL-5Rα mAbs.

Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus affecting both children and adults, with debilitating and progressive symptoms. EoE has shown an explosive epidemiological rise in the past few decades. Many patients experience a poor level of disease control despite maximal use of available guideline-based therapies, which seriously hampers their quality of life. Diet restrictions and systemic and topical corticosteroids are the current mainstays of EoE therapy, but are associated with significant efficacy, treatment compliance, and safety issues such as oral or esophageal candidiasis, growth retardation, osteopenia, osteoporosis, glucose intolerance, and cataract formation. As EoE is a chronic inflammatory disease, immune cells and cytokines are responsible for the inflammatory response and symptoms. Monoclonal antibodies specifically targeting these pathophysiologic effectors offer more potent relief of histologic and clinical disease features while keeping off-target adverse effects to a minimum. Herein, we have reviewed the current evidence regarding efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies including mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), reslizumab (anti-IL-5), QAX576 (anti-IL-13), omalizumab (anti-immunoglobulin-E), and infliximab (anti-TNF-α) in treatment of EoE. Our review indicates that although the use of monoclonal antibodies for EoE treatment is safe with limited and reversible adverse events, however, it is not yet possible to reach a final verdict on the efficacy of mAbs in EoE. Future well-designed studies are needed to clarify the exact role of mAbs in EoE.

Overlooked benefits of using polyclonal antibodies

The benefits of polyclonal antibodies as tools for assay-specific target discovery and detection are numerous. As the future of basic research, diagnostics and biomarker discovery is dependent on high-quality reproducible data, there is a need to understand the importance and benefits of these valuable tools. All antibody forms - polyclonal, hybridoma-based monoclonal and recombinant monoclonal - have pros and cons for development, validation and use. Yet, polyclonal antibodies are embroiled in a firestorm of controversy concerning data reproducibility. We address best practices for developing and using polyclonal antibodies, pitfalls to their use and how to avoid them, and benefits to the life science community. Eliminating their use risks overlooking the unique benefits of polyclonal antibodies as 'fit-for-purpose' life science tools.

Nanoformulated ABT-199 to effectively target Bcl-2 at mitochondrial membrane alleviates airway inflammation by inducing apoptosis

Elimination of airway inflammatory cells is essential for asthma control. As Bcl-2 protein is highly expressed on the mitochondrial outer membrane in inflammatory cells, we chose a Bcl-2 inhibitor, ABT-199, which can inhibit airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness by inducing inflammatory cell apoptosis. Herein, we synthesized a pH-sensitive nanoformulated Bcl-2 inhibitor (Nf-ABT-199) that could specifically deliver ABT-199 to the mitochondria of bronchial inflammatory cells. The proof-of-concept study of an inflammatory cell mitochondria-targeted therapy using Nf-ABT-199 was validated in a mouse model of allergic asthma. Nf-ABT-199 was proven to significantly alleviate airway inflammation by effectively inducing eosinophil apoptosis and inhibiting both inflammatory cell infiltration and mucus hypersecretion. In addition, the nanocarrier or Nf-ABT-199 showed no obvious influence on cell viability, airway epithelial barrier and liver function, implying excellent biocompatibility and with non-toxic effect. The nanoformulated Bcl-2 inhibitor Nf-ABT-199 accumulates in the mitochondria of inflammatory cells and efficiently alleviates allergic asthma.

Management of severe asthma: targeting the airways, comorbidities and risk factors

Severe asthma is a complex heterogeneous disease that is refractory to standard treatment and is complicated by multiple comorbidities and risk factors. In mild to moderate asthma, the burden of disease can be minimised by inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators and self-management education. In severe asthma, however, management is more complex. When patients with asthma continue to experience symptoms and exacerbations despite optimal management, severe refractory asthma (SRA) should be suspected and confirmed, and other aetiologies ruled out. Once a diagnosis of SRA is established, patients should undergo a systematic and multidimensional assessment to identify inflammatory endotypes, risk factors and comorbidities, with targeted and individualised management initiated. We describe a practical approach to assessment and management of patients with SRA.

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for eosinophilic asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CONTEXT

Benralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the α chain of the IL-5 receptor (IL-5Rα) and is currently being assessed in clinical trials for asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

Our systematic review and meta-analysis intends to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic asthma.

DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION

Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were performed to identify randomized controlled trials of benralizumab and clinic outcomes in asthmatics.

RESULTS

In total, 7 articles with 2,321 subjects met our inclusion criteria. From this pooled analysis, we found that benralizumab significantly reduces exacerbations (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.76, p < 0.00001; I² = 52%, p = 0.06) compared to placebo in eosinophilic asthma. There was no statistical trend for improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second or asthma control indices such as Quality of Life Assessment (AQLQ) and Asthma Control Questionnaire score in benralizumab-treated patients. In addition, safety data indicated that benralizumab administration resulted no increasing incidence of adverse events and was well tolerated (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95-1.05, p = 0.96; I² = 40%, p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for asthma patients with severe or uncontrolled symptoms and elevated eosinophils and provide support for benralizumab as an ideal option to treat asthma in this patient population.

Multidimensional assessment of severe asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The management of severe asthma is complex. Multidimensional assessment (MDA) of specific traits has been proposed as an effective strategy to manage severe asthma, although it is supported by few prospective studies. We aimed to systematically review the literature published on MDA in severe asthma, to identify the traits included in MDA and to determine the effect of MDA on asthma-related outcomes. We identified 26 studies and classified these based on study type (cohort/cross-sectional studies; experimental/outcome studies; and severe asthma disease registries). Study type determined the comprehensiveness of the assessment. Assessed traits were classified into three domains (airways, co-morbidities and risk factors). The airway domain had the largest number of traits assessed (mean ± SD = 4.2 ± 1.7) compared with co-morbidities (3.6 ± 2.2) and risk factors (3.9 ± 2.1). Bronchodilator reversibility and airflow limitation were assessed in 92% of studies, whereas airway inflammation was only assessed in 50%. Commonly assessed co-morbidities were psychological dysfunction, sinusitis (both 73%) and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD; 69%). Atopic and smoking statuses were the most commonly assessed risk factors (85% and 86%, respectively). There were six outcome studies, of which five concluded that MDA is effective at improving asthma-related outcomes. Among these studies, significantly more traits were assessed than treated. MDA studies have assessed a variety of different traits and have shown evidence of improved outcomes. This promising model of care requires more research to inform which traits should be assessed, which traits should be treated and what effect MDA has on patient outcomes.

Severe asthma: Current management, targeted therapies and future directions-A roundtable report

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by respiratory symptoms, airway inflammation, airway obstruction and airway hyper-responsiveness. Asthma is common and directly affects 10% of Australians, 1-5% of adults in Asia and 300 million people worldwide. It is a heterogeneous disorder with many clinical, molecular, biological and pathophysiological phenotypes. Current management strategies successfully treat the majority of patients with asthma who have access to them. However, there is a subset of an estimated 5-10% of patients with asthma who have severe disease and are disproportionately impacted by symptoms, exacerbations and overall illness burden. The care required for this relatively small proportion of patients is also significant and has a major impact on the healthcare system. A number of new therapies that hold promise for severe asthma are currently in clinical trials or are entering the Australian and international market. However, recognition of severe asthma in clinical practice is variable, and there is little consensus on the best models of care or how to integrate emerging and often costly therapies into current practice. In this article, we report on roundtable discussions held with severe asthma experts from around Australia, and make recommendations about approaches for better patient diagnosis and assessment. We assess current models of care for patient management and discuss how approaches may be optimized to improve patient outcomes. Finally, we propose mechanisms to assess new therapies and how to best integrate these approaches into future treatment.

Omalizumab Treatment Response in a Population With Severe Allergic Asthma and Overlapping COPD

BACKGROUND

Asthma and COPD are common airway diseases. Individuals with overlapping asthma and COPD experience increased health impairment and severe disease exacerbations. Efficacious treatment options are required for this population. Omalizumab (anti-IgE) therapy is effective in patients with severe persistent asthma, but limited data are available on efficacy in populations with overlapping asthma and COPD.

METHODS

Data from the Australian Xolair Registry were used to compare treatment responses in individuals with asthma-COPD overlap with responses in patients with severe asthma alone. Participants were assessed at baseline and after 6 months of omalizumab treatment. We used several different definitions of asthma-COPD overlap. First, we compared participants with a previous physician diagnosis of COPD to participants with no COPD diagnosis. We then made comparisons based on baseline lung function, comparing participants with an FEV₁ < 80% predicted to those with an FEV₁ > 80% predicted after bronchodilator use. In the population with an FEV₁< 80%, analysis was further stratified based on smoking history.

RESULTS

Omalizumab treatment markedly improved asthma control and health-related quality of life in all populations assessed based on the Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores. Omalizumab treatment did not improve lung function (FEV₁, FVC, or FEV₁/FVC ratio) in populations that were enriched for asthma-COPD overlap (diagnosis of COPD or FEV₁ < 80%/ever smokers).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that omalizumab improves asthma control and health-related quality of life in individuals with severe allergic asthma and overlapping COPD. These findings provide real-world efficacy data for this patient population and suggest that omalizumab is useful in the management of severe asthma with COPD overlap.