The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper-responders in in vitro fertilization

PURPOSE

To provide agreed-upon guidelines on the management of a hyper-responsive patient undergoing ovarian stimulation (OS) METHODS: A literature search was performed regarding the management of hyper-response to OS for assisted reproductive technology. A scientific committee consisting of 4 experts discussed, amended, and selected the final statements. A priori, it was decided that consensus would be reached when ≥66% of the participants agreed, and ≤3 rounds would be used to obtain this consensus. A total of 28/31 experts responded (selected for global coverage), anonymous to each other.

RESULTS

A total of 26/28 statements reached consensus. The most relevant are summarized here. The target number of oocytes to be collected in a stimulation cycle for IVF in an anticipated hyper-responder is 15-19 (89.3% consensus). For a potential hyper-responder, it is preferable to achieve a hyper-response and freeze all than aim for a fresh transfer (71.4% consensus). GnRH agonists should be avoided for pituitary suppression in anticipated hyper-responders performing IVF (96.4% consensus). The preferred starting dose in the first IVF stimulation cycle of an anticipated hyper-responder of average weight is 150 IU/day (82.1% consensus). ICoasting in order to decrease the risk of OHSS should not be used (89.7% consensus). Metformin should be added before/during ovarian stimulation to anticipated hyper-responders only if the patient has PCOS and is insulin resistant (82.1% consensus). In the case of a hyper-response, a dopaminergic agent should be used only if hCG will be used as a trigger (including dual/double trigger) with or without a fresh transfer (67.9% consensus). After using a GnRH agonist trigger due to a perceived risk of OHSS, luteal phase rescue with hCG and an attempt of a fresh transfer is discouraged regardless of the number of oocytes collected (72.4% consensus). The choice of the FET protocol is not influenced by the fact that the patient is a hyper-responder (82.8% consensus). In the cases of freeze all due to OHSS risk, a FET cycle can be performed in the immediate first menstrual cycle (92.9% consensus).

CONCLUSION

These guidelines for the management of hyper-response can be useful for tailoring patient care and for harmonizing future research.

Reproductive Outcome After GnRH Agonist Triggering With Co-Administration of 1500 IU hCG on the Day of Oocyte Retrieval in High Responders: A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study

While triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) seems to be safe and effective in terms of the risk of developing OHSS and the number of metaphase II oocytes, it nevertheless results in luteal phase deficiency. To date, strategies have been developed in order to rescue defective luteal phase of GnRHa triggered cycles. Our study aimed to assess the reproductive outcome of GnRHa triggered cycles combined with modified luteal support (1500 IU hCG at the day of oocyte retrieval) in women with high ovarian response and to compare the outcome with hCG triggered cycles in GnRH antagonist IVF-ICSI procedures. A retrospective cohort database review of the results of GnRH antagonist IVF-ICSI cycles was conducted at a tertiary-care IVF center in Ljubljana, Slovenia. A total of 6126 cycles, performed from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, were included in the final analysis. Final oocyte maturation was performed with either 5000, 6500, or 10,000 IU hCG (women with normal ovarian response) or 0.6 mg GnRHa (buserelin), supplemented with 1500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval (in women with high ovarian response). In cases of excessive ovarian response and/or high risk of OHSS luteal support was not introduced and all good quality blastocysts were frozen. According to significant differences in patients' age and the number of oocytes in the two groups, matching by age and number of oocytes was performed. No significant differences were observed regarding pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, rate of early pregnancy loss, and livebirth rate per pregnancy between the GnRHa and hCG trigger groups, respectively. A significant difference in the number of developed embryos and blastocysts, as well as the number of frozen blastocysts, was seen in favor of the GnRHa trigger. However, the birth weight in the GnRHa trigger group was significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study support the use of GnRHa for final oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles in women with high ovarian response. Luteal phase rescue was performed by co-administration of 1500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval and estradiol and progesterone supplementation. In our experience, such an approach results in a comparable reproductive outcome with hCG trigger group.

Multiorgan failure associated with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome due to inadequate protocol optimisation: a rare but avoidable complication

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a well-recognised iatrogenic complication following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Mild to moderate cases are mostly managed conservatively. Severe cases of OHSS can be potentially fatal. For this reason, UK clinics providing licensed fertility treatment are obliged to follow Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority guidelines for reporting severe incidents. We present an unusually severe complication of OHSS resulting in significant morbidity. A nulligravida woman aged 25, with a 4-year history of subfertility and multiple risk factors for the development of OHSS, underwent COS. Immediately following oocyte retrieval, the patient developed symptoms of early-onset severe OHSS. The subsequent clinical deterioration of the patient precipitated multiple organ failure, including renal and hepatic dysfunction. Despite supportive management in an intensive care unit, the patient required transfer to a tertiary liver centre for specialist treatment. OHSS is a preventable complication; therefore, such an uncommon presentation of the syndrome provides important clinical lessons to be discussed.

Associations between IVF outcomes and essential trace elements measured in follicular fluid and urine: a pilot study

PURPOSE

A hypothesis-generating pilot study exploring associations between essential trace elements measured in follicular fluid (FF) and urine and in vitro fertilization (IVF) endpoints.

METHODS

We recruited 58 women undergoing IVF between 2007 and 2008, and measured cobalt, chromium, copper, manganese, molybdenum, and zinc in FF (n = 46) and urine (n = 45) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). We used multivariable regression models to assess the impact of FF and urine trace elements on IVF outcomes, adjusted for age, body mass index, race, and cigarette smoking.

RESULTS

Trace elements were mostly present at lower concentrations in FF than in urine. The average number of oocytes retrieved was positively associated with higher urine cobalt, chromium, copper, and molybdenum concentrations. FF chromium and manganese were negatively associated with the proportion of mature oocytes, yet urine manganese had a positive association. FF zinc was inversely associated with average oocyte fertilization. Urine trace elements were significant positive predictors for the total number of embryos generated. FF copper predicted lower embryo fragmentation while urine copper was associated with higher embryo cell number and urine manganese with higher embryo fragmentation. No associations were detected for implantation, pregnancy, or live birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the importance of trace elements in both FF and urine for intermediate, although not necessarily clinical, IVF endpoints. The results differed using FF or urine biomarkers of exposure, which may have implications for the design of clinical and epidemiologic investigations. These initial findings will form the basis of a more definitive future study.

Predictive factors for recovery time in patients suffering from severe OHSS

BACKGROUND

To evaluate predictive factors for recovery time from severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, 201 women who were hospitalized for severe OHSS were included. Patients with recurrent OHSS were excluded. All the patients received standardized treatment including intravenous hydration, plasma volume expansion, human albumin, furosemid, subcutaneous heparin, and paracentesis if necessary. The main outcome parameter was recovery time from OHSS. Recovery was defined if a morning hematocrit <40%, rebalance of electrolytes, and serum creatinine <1 mg/dL were reached during the standardized therapy and the patient had not suffered from abdominal pain and discomfort at least for one day without any OHSS-specific infusions or medications.

RESULTS

Pregnant patients (n=80, 39.8%) revealed a longer median duration until recovery than non-pregnant patients (n=121, 60.2%; 10 days, IQR 7-13, vs. 8 days, IQR 6-10, respectively; p=0.001). In a generalized linear model, presence of polycystic ovary syndrome before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (beta=0.3342 +/- 0.1335, p=0.012) and use of hCG for ovulation induction (beta=0.222 +/- 0.1389, p=0.048) were associated with a longer recovery time in pregnant patients. In non-pregnant patients, none of the tested factors was associated with recovery time.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant patients with severe OHSS needed a significantly longer recovery time than non-pregnant patients. In pregnant patients, presence of polycystic ovary syndrome and ovulation induction with hCG were associated with longer recovery times.

Severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger with the addition of 1500 IU hCG

STUDY QUESTION

Is severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) completely prevented with the GnRH agonist trigger and 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue protocol?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Severe early OHSS can occur even after the GnRH agonist trigger and 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue protocol.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Prior studies including over 200 women who received the GnRH agonist trigger and 1500 hCG luteal rescue protocol have reported complete prevention of severe early OHSS. Only a few late OHSS cases have been reported and it has been suggested that this protocol can be safely applied to any women under risk.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort study included all women who were at high risk of OHSS and were given the GnRH agonist trigger plus hCG luteal rescue protocol between December 2008 and August 2012 in the two participating centers.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

There were 23 women with a mean estradiol level of 4891 ± 2214 pg/ml and a mean number of >12 mm follicles of 20 ± 6 on the day of ovulation triggering. OHSS was categorized according to the Golan criteria.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Overall 6 of the 23 (26%) women developed severe OHSS. Five women had severe early OHSS requiring ascites drainage and hospitalization and three of these women did not undergo embryo transfer. The number of follicles measuring 10-14 mm on the day of triggering was significantly different between women who developed severe early OHSS and those who did not.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The small number of women with severe early OHSS may have prevented identification of other significant risk factors.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Although the GnRH agonist plus 1500 IU hCG luteal rescue protocol significantly decreases the risk of severe OHSS, this life threatening complication can still occur in high-risk patients. It would be prudent to avoid hCG luteal rescue and freeze all embryos for future transfer in such women particularly when there are ≥18 follicles with 10-14 mm diameters even with few larger follicles.

Cabergoline for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a complication resulting from administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment. Most case are mild, but forms of moderate or severe OHSS appear in 3% to 8% of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles. Recently, the dopamine agonist cabergoline has been introduced as a secondary prevention intervention for OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS who are undergoing ART treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of cabergoline in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-risk women undergoing ART treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

Major medical databases (Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of trials, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO) were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of cabergoline in preventing OHSS. Databases were searched up to September 2011. Registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies were searched. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs which compared cabergoline with placebo, no treatment or another intervention for preventing OHSS in high-risk women were considered for inclusion. Primary outcome measures included incidence of moderate or severe OHSS and live birth rate. Secondary endpoints were clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and any other adverse effects of the treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and the full text of publications; extracted data; and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Pooled results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) by the Mantel-Haenszel method.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two trials involving 230 women met the inclusion criteria. Both studies had a moderate risk of bias. Oral cabergoline, 0.5 mg daily, was given as an intervention and compared with a matched placebo. A statistically significant reduction in OHSS was observed in the cabergoline treated group (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.77; 2 RCTs, 230 women) with a number needed to treat (NTT) of 7. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate OHSS, favouring cabergoline (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.78; 2 RCTs, 230 women) but not in severe OHSS (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.45; 2 RCTs, 230 women). There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.59; 2 RCTs, 230 women), miscarriage rate (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.07; 1 RCT, 163 women) or any other adverse effects of the treatment (OR 2.07, 95% CI 0.56 to 7.70; 1 RCT, 67 women). However, no data on multiple pregnancy rate or live birth rate were reported in either trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Cabergoline appears to reduce the risk of OHSS in high-risk women, especially for moderate OHSS. The use of cabergoline does not affect the pregnancy outcome (clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate), nor is there an increased risk of adverse events. Further research should consider the risk of administering cabergoline and the comparison between cabergoline and established treatments (such as intravenous albumin and coasting). Large, well-designed and well-executed RCTs that involve more clinical endpoints are necessary to further evaluate the role of cabergoline in OHSS prevention.

Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos for fertility preservation for female cancer patients

In vitro fertilization and embryo cryopreservation is regarded as the only established method for fertility preservation in female cancer patients. However, a possible delay in treatment of the primary disease due to ovarian stimulation, exposure to supraphysiologic estrogen levels induced by ovarian stimulation, the requirement for a male partner or willingness to use donor sperm for embryo production, legal, ethical, religious issues related to cryopreservation of embryos raise concerns for patients and physicians. Recent improvements achieved with oocyte vitrification have increased the effectiveness of oocyte cryopreservation rendering it a viable option, especially for patients without a male partner. In vitro maturation avoids treatment delay or exposure to increased estradiol levels associated with ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. In vitro maturation combined with embryo or oocyte vitrification provides previously unavailable options for some patients and improves the services provided by a fertility preservation program.