Continuous Noninvasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present study, which was conducted in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, was to compare continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measured with the ClearSight device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) with invasive radial artery pressure used as the reference method. The authors hypothesized that the ClearSight device is an accurate, precise, safe, and efficient method for arterial blood pressure measurement comparable with an invasive radial arterial line.

DESIGN

The study included the retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients scheduled for elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (Edwards Lifesciences) at a single tertiary academic hospital, who underwent monitoring with both the ClearSight device and an invasive radial arterial pressure line. The patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement from October to December 2019.

SETTING

Single tertiary academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 20 patients, with 2,243 unique blood pressure data points.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A statistically significant correlation between the invasive radial arterial pressure line and the ClearSight device was observed for systolic blood pressure (correlation coefficient 0.86; p < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (correlation coefficient 0.56; p < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (correlation coefficient 0.78; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure between the two methods. Results for systolic blood pressure between the arterial line and ClearSight device were as follows: bias = 9.8 ± 10.1, percentage bias = 7.6%, and mean error = 15.8%. Results for diastolic blood pressure between the arterial line and ClearSight device were as follows: bias = -5.9 ± 7.8, percentage bias = 10.7%, and mean error = 28.4%. Results for mean arterial pressure between the arterial line and ClearSight device were as follows: bias = 0.3 ± 7.4, percentage bias = 0.4%, and mean error = 18.3%. The concordance rates of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were 100%, 95.1%, and 98.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy, agreement, and precision of the ClearSight device were convincing for mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure for patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Ascending Aorta Secondary to Embolized Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Since its approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2011, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has revolutionized the treatment of aortic valvular disease with a rapid increase in use. Potentially fatal aortic complications are rare, occurring in 0.2% to 1.1% of cases-all reported in the early perioperative period. We present a case of a late ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm with rupture secondary to erosion by an embolized transcatheter aortic valve occurring 6 years after implantation. The patient was successfully treated with a commercially available, off-the-shelf aortic endograft.

Acute intraventricular migration of a transcatheter aortic prosthesis

We describe a low-risk patient who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation after refusing conventional surgery. During the procedure, prosthesis migration into the left ventricle prompted emergency surgical aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is currently indicated in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis; its role in intermediate-risk subjects remains controversial, while in low-risk patients, surgery is still the procedure of choice. Because of such severe unpredictable procedure-related complications, the management of low-risk patients refusing surgery may be difficult. Whether the heart team should also consider potential ethical and economic aspects remains to be defined.

Mitral Valve Stenosis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Mitral stenosis is a rare and potentially severe complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Given the anatomic coupling and interdependence of the aortic and mitral valves, it comes by itself that procedures (either surgical or percutaneous) involving the aortic valve imply the risk of altering mitral valve function. Indeed, transcatheter aortic prostheses may impair adequate anterior mitral leaflet (AML) opening, especially when implanted in a "low" position, thus resulting in high transvalvular gradients. Hereby, we report the case of a 71-year-old male with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and a history of previous surgical mitral valve repair who underwent TAVR with a self-expandable prosthesis. Notwithstanding an acceptable angiographic position, the prosthetic frame was shown to interfere with the AML, as evidenced by augmented transmitral gradients; nonetheless, pulmonary artery pressures remained unchanged, and the patient experienced symptomatic improvement. Therefore, a conservative approach was chosen and the patient was discharged home after medical therapy optimization. Moreover, we provide a review of the available literature regarding the incidence, predictors and possible management of this infrequent complication.

Patient-specific simulation of guidewire deformation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a recent mini-invasive procedure to implant an aortic valve prosthesis. Prosthesis positioning in transcatheter aortic valve implantation appears as an important aspect for the success of the intervention. Accordingly, we developed a patient-specific finite element framework to predict the insertion of the stiff guidewire, used to position the aortic valve. We simulated the guidewire insertion for 2 patients based on their pre-operative CT scans. The model was designed to primarily predict the position and the angle of the guidewires in the aortic valve, and the results were successfully compared with intraoperative images. The present paper describes extensively the numerical model, which was solved by using the ANSYS software with an implicit resolution scheme, as well as the stabilization techniques which were used to overcome numerical instabilities. We performed sensitivity analysis on the properties of the guidewire (curvature angle, curvature radius, and stiffness) and the conditions of insertion (insertion force and orientation). We also explored the influence of the model parameters. The accuracy of the model was quantitatively evaluated as the distance and the angle difference between the simulated guidewires and the intraoperative ones. A good agreement was obtained between the model predictions and intraoperative views available for 2 patient cases. In conclusion, we showed that the shape of the guidewire in the aortic valve was mainly determined by the geometry of the patient's aorta and by the conditions of insertion (insertion force and orientation).

Can finite element models of ballooning procedures yield mechanical response of the cardiovascular site to overexpansion?

Patient-specific numerical models could aid the decision-making process for percutaneous valve selection; in order to be fully informative, they should include patient-specific data of both anatomy and mechanics of the implantation site. This information can be derived from routine clinical imaging during the cardiac cycle, but data on the implantation site mechanical response to device expansion are not routinely available.

We aim to derive the implantation site response to overexpansion by monitoring pressure/dimensional changes during balloon sizing procedures and by applying a reverse engineering approach using a validated computational balloon model. This study presents the proof of concept for such computational framework tested in-vitro. A finite element (FE) model of a PTS-X405 sizing balloon (NuMed, Inc., USA) was created and validated against bench tests carried out on an ad hoc experimental apparatus: first on the balloon alone to replicate free expansion; second on the inflation of the balloon in a rapid prototyped cylinder with material deemed suitable for replicating pulmonary arteries in order to validate balloon/implantation site interaction algorithm.

Finally, the balloon was inflated inside a compliant rapid prototyped patient-specific right ventricular outflow tract to test the validity of the approach. The corresponding FE simulation was set up to iteratively infer the mechanical response of the anatomical model. The test in this simplified condition confirmed the feasibility of the proposed approach and the potential for this methodology to provide patient-specific information on mechanical response of the implantation site when overexpanded, ultimately for more realistic computational simulations in patient-specific settings.

Replacement of a Dislocated Aortic Prosthesis After Transcatheter Valve Implantation

A 77-year-old woman who had severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and was a high risk for conventional surgery underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation by means of the transfemoral approach. The prosthesis migrated and became embolized in the left ventricle after inflation, causing interference with the mitral valve and also partial outflow tract obstruction. The patient was emergently transferred to the operating room. Vertical aortotomy was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass, and the calcified native leaflets were removed. The migrated Edwards SAPIEN XT valve was extracted and subsequently successfully sewn into the annulus after examination for leaflet and stent competence. The hemodynamic performance of the implanted valve was surprisingly more favorable than that of the conventional tissue prosthesis.

Rare complication of ventricular septal defect in three patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a highly-effective but technically challenging procedure. Despite improvement in device technology and operator techniques, complications are common and previously unknown procedural-related complications continue to arise. In this report, we present a case series of three patients with acquired perimembranous ventricular septal defects following transfemoral TAVR with an Edwards SAPIEN prosthesis.

Iatrogenic communications between aortic root and right ventricle/left atrium after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative, less invasive treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, who are high-risk for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement, due to co-morbidities. In addition to a 30-day 10% mortality risk there is a recognized range of complications, which commonly relate to vascular access trauma, paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and cerebrovascular events. In the following case reports, we discuss two previously unreported complications of TAVR: (i) an iatrogenic communication between the aortic root and the right ventricle and (ii) an iatrogenic communication between the aortic root and the left atrium. Informed written consent was obtained from both patients.

[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation : what do anesthetists need to know?]

Surgical replacement of aortic valves is the gold standard for therapy of high grade aortic valve stenosis. However, the changes in demography confront the responsible medical discipline with an increasingly higher risk profile of patients which necessitates the development of new less invasive alternative forms of treatment for the surgical therapy of aortic valve stenosis. This developmental process has progressed from mini-thoracotomy to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The TAVI procedure is a new therapeutic option for treatment of patients with high grade aortic valve stenosis and high perioperative morbidity and mortality risks with conventional aortic valve replacement. Because TAVI can be carried out while the heart is still beating and without a sternotomy or heart-lung maschine, this procedure is particularly suitable for elderly multimorbid patients and/or patients with previous cardiac surgery. The initial results of large prospective multicenter studies underline the value of TAVI in the modern treatment of high risk patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. In addition to an understanding of the surgical procedure, anesthetists must have precise knowledge of the perioperative anesthesia management and possible complications of the procedure.