1
|
Gioia FP, Ferrante G, Liccardo G, Barberis G. 487 LEFT MAIN TRIFURCATION RESTENOSIS: A COMBINED STRATEGY FOR A COMPLEX ANATOMICAL SCENARIO. Eur Heart J Suppl 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac121.335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Unprotected left main trifurcations (ULMT) are highly challenging lesions for the interventionalist. There is still no evidence on the best revascularization strategy, and the risk of short-term procedural complications and long-term adverse outcomes remains high.
We report the case of a 62-years-old with multiple risk factors and a high bleeding risk attributable to severe pancytopenia. Due to an episode of unstable angina, he underwent coronary angiography showing a left main stem (LM) trifurcation with critical ostial left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis, and a proximal LAD sub-occlusive lesion extending to the ostium of the first diagonal (D1) Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) consisted of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided deployment of two drug-eluting stents (DES) from LM to mid-LAD.
One year later he was admitted for chest pain relapse. Coronary angiogram demonstrated critical in-stent restenosis at the proximal LAD and sub-occlusions of ostial ramus intermediate (RI) and ostial circumflex (Cx) (Figure 1).
Re-do PCI consisted of multiple pre-dilations and deployment of a DES on proximal-mid LAD within the previous stent, with two sequential triple kissing inflations on LAD-RI-Cx (Figure 2). Angioplasty on RI and Cx was accomplished with two drug-coated balloons (DCBs) kissing inflation, followed by final triple kissing, with an optimal angiographic result (Figure 3).
In our opinion, the combined use of DCBs and main branch stenting, further optimized by multiple triple kissing balloons, seems to be the most harmonious approach to treat such complex coronary lesions, where the use of multiple stenting strategies might be an overly cumbersome strategy, especially when an intrinsic bleeding risk makes long or powerful anti-thrombotic protocols not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Paolo Gioia
- Department Of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical And Research Center , IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, Rozzano - Milan , Italy
- Humanitas University, Department Of Biomedical Sciences , Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele - Milan , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrante
- Department Of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical And Research Center , IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, Rozzano - Milan , Italy
- Humanitas University, Department Of Biomedical Sciences , Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele - Milan , Italy
| | - Gaetano Liccardo
- Department Of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical And Research Center , IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, Rozzano - Milan , Italy
- Humanitas University, Department Of Biomedical Sciences , Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele - Milan , Italy
| | - Giancarlo Barberis
- Department Of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical And Research Center , IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, Rozzano - Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cannata F, Regazzoli D, Barberis G, Chiarito M, Leone PP, Lavanco V, Stefanini GG, Ferrante G, Pagnotta P, Bragato R, Corrada E, Torracca L, Condorelli G, Reimers B. Mitral Valve Stenosis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2019; 20:1196-1202. [PMID: 30905659 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Mitral stenosis is a rare and potentially severe complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Given the anatomic coupling and interdependence of the aortic and mitral valves, it comes by itself that procedures (either surgical or percutaneous) involving the aortic valve imply the risk of altering mitral valve function. Indeed, transcatheter aortic prostheses may impair adequate anterior mitral leaflet (AML) opening, especially when implanted in a "low" position, thus resulting in high transvalvular gradients. Hereby, we report the case of a 71-year-old male with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and a history of previous surgical mitral valve repair who underwent TAVR with a self-expandable prosthesis. Notwithstanding an acceptable angiographic position, the prosthetic frame was shown to interfere with the AML, as evidenced by augmented transmitral gradients; nonetheless, pulmonary artery pressures remained unchanged, and the patient experienced symptomatic improvement. Therefore, a conservative approach was chosen and the patient was discharged home after medical therapy optimization. Moreover, we provide a review of the available literature regarding the incidence, predictors and possible management of this infrequent complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cannata
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Damiano Regazzoli
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy.
| | - Giancarlo Barberis
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Mauro Chiarito
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Pier Pasquale Leone
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Lavanco
- Non-invasive Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Giulio G Stefanini
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrante
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Pagnotta
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Renato Bragato
- Non-invasive Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Elena Corrada
- Non-invasive Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Lucia Torracca
- Cardiac Surgery, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Condorelli
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| | - Bernhard Reimers
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comella P, Massidda B, Natale D, Filippelli G, Farris A, Condemi G, Palmeri S, Tafuto S, Vessia G, Barberis G. Bevacizumab (Bev), irinotecan (IRI), folinic acid (FA), and 5-fluorouracil (FU) every 2 weeks (BIFF regimen) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients (pts): The SICOG experience. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e15067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15067 Background: The IRIFAFU regimen produced in MCRC pts a consistent activity (RR, 33% [95% CI, 27–39%], PFS, 7.4 [95% CI, 6.5–8.3] mo.) in 2 consecutive randomized SICOG trials . Bev was proven to significantly improve the efficacy of IFL regimen. Here we report the safety and activity results of the BIFF regimen as first-line treatment of MCRC. Patients: From Feb 2007 to Jul 2008, 95 pts with MCRC were treated: so far, 85 pts were evaluated for safety: M/F were 47/38, median age (range) was 64 (35–78) yrs. Fifty-six pts had a colon, and 29 pts a rectal carcinoma. ECOG PS was 0 (63 pts, 74%), or 1 (22 pts, 26%). Thirty-four (40%) pts had 1 site, 33 (39%) 2 sites, and 18 (21%) pts ≥3 sites of disease. Liver was involved in 66 (78%), lung in 23 (24%) pts. Twenty-one (25%) pts had an unresected primary (colon 13, rectum 8). Bev 5 mg/kg (1-h), and IRI 180 mg/sqm (1-h) were given IV on day 1, 6S-FA 250 mg/sqm (2-h), and FU 850 mg/sqm (bolus) were given IV on day 2 biweekly for a maximum of 12 cycles. Bev was continued until progression, severe toxicity, or refusal. Results: A median of 9 (range, 1–12) cycles of BIFF were delivered. G4 hematologic toxicity was: neutropenia (21%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). G≥3 non-hematologic toxicity was: diarrhea 15%, vomiting 7%, stomatitis 4%, hypertension 1%. No severe episodes of bleeding were registered. Among 81 assessable pts, 5 CRs (3 in liver, 1 in liver & nodes, 1 in liver & lung), and 41 PRs were registered, giving a RR of 57% (95% CI, 45–68%). Overall, 71/81 (88%, 95% CI, 77–93%) pts obtained a disease control. Liver mets resection, or primary resection, was safely performed in 3 pts and in 2 pts, respectively. After a median follow- up of 12 (range, 6–24) mo., median FFS was 8.4 (95% CI, 6.8–10.0), and median PFS was 14.1 (95% CI, 9.6–18.6) mo. With only 14 deaths, OS results are still immature. Conclusions: Unexpected side effects of the BIFF regimen were not registered. Addition of Bev increased the activity without worsening the tolerability of IRIFAFU combination as compared with our previous experience. Efficacy of BIFF was comparable with that reported with other Bev plus IRI-based combinations. Updated follow-up will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Comella
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - B. Massidda
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - D. Natale
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - G. Filippelli
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - A. Farris
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - G. Condemi
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - S. Palmeri
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - S. Tafuto
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - G. Vessia
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - G. Barberis
- National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy; University Medical School, Cagliari, Italy; City Hospital, Penne, Italy; City Hospital, Paola, Italy; University Medical School, Sassari, Italy; City Hospital, Siderno, Italy; University Medical School, Palermo, Italy; City Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy; City Hospital, Altamura, Italy; Villa Betania Hospital, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|