Relationship between joint motion and acceleration during single-leg standing in healthy male adults

Effects of isokinetic and proprioceptive training after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction (LALR) is fundamental to avoid instability and the risk of osteoarthritis. After surgery, deficits in muscular strength and the proprioceptive system lead to functional changes. This study aimed to investigate if proprioceptive and isokinetic training can be incorporated to manage a professional soccer player after LALR.

METHOD

A 25-year-old professional soccer player, who injured his right ankle while playing, participated in the study. An MRI revealed partial rupture of the anterior talofibular ligament and associated fracture of the posterolateral distal fibular. Three months after the reconstruction surgery, the participant performed 20 sessions of isokinetic training along with 10 proprioceptive exercises. Outcomes were isokinetic inversion and eversion variables in concentric mode at 60, 120, and 240°/s (during the isokinetic phase - sustained velocity), postural sway (assessed in single-limb stance, using a force platform), and physical function (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)).

RESULTS

Post-treatment, the sustained velocity increased by ∼6% and decreased by 3% in the other isokinetic phases in inversion and eversion. At 60°/s, the Peak Torque/Body Mass for the evertor muscle was 30% higher post-treatment. Center of Pressure (CoP) data with eyes open showed a decrease for anteroposterior dispersions and displacement. The FAAM (sports sub-section) and LEFS increased by 15.6 and 9 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Isokinetic and proprioceptive training improved postural control parameters, physical function, and inversion and eversion isokinetic variables in a professional soccer player after lateral ligament reconstruction.

Center of Pressure Deviation during Posture Transition in Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability

Center of pressure (COP) tracking during posture transition is an ideal scale for determining the recurrence of an ankle injury, thereby preventing chronic ankle instability (CAI). However, the same is difficult to determine because the reduced ability of certain patients (who experienced sprain) to control posture at the ankle joint is masked by the chain of hip and ankle joint motion. Thus, we observed the effects of knee joint immobilization/non-immobilization on postural control strategies during the posture transition task and attempted to evaluate the detailed pathophysiology of CAI. Ten athletes with unilateral CAI were selected. To examine differences in COP trajectories in the CAI side and non-CAI legs, patients stood on both legs for 10 s and one leg for 20 s with/without knee braces. COP acceleration during the transition was significantly higher in the CAI group with a knee brace. The COP transition from the double- to single-leg stance phase was significantly longer in the CAI foot. In the CAI group, the fixation of the knee joint increased COP acceleration during postural deviation. This suggests that there is likely an ankle joint dysfunction in the CAI group that is masked by the hip strategy.

Wearable Devices and Smartphone Inertial Sensors for Static Balance Assessment: A Concurrent Validity Study in Young Adult Population

Falls represent a public health issue around the world and prevention is an important part of the politics of many countries. The standard method of evaluating balance is posturography using a force platform, which has high financial costs. Other instruments, such as portable devices and smartphones, have been evaluated as low-cost alternatives to the screening of balance control. Although smartphones and wearables have different sizes, shapes, and weights, they have been systematically validated for static balance control tasks. Different studies have applied different experimental configurations to validate the inertial measurements obtained by these devices. We aim to evaluate the concurrent validity of a smartphone and a portable device for the evaluation of static balance control in the same group of participants. Twenty-six healthy and young subjects comprised the sample. The validity for static balance control evaluation of built-in accelerometers inside portable smartphone and wearable devices was tested considering force platform recordings as a gold standard for comparisons. A linear correlation (r) between the quantitative variables obtained from the inertial sensors and the force platform was used as an indicator of the concurrent validity. Reliability of the measures was calculated using Intraclass correlation in a subsample (n = 14). Smartphones had 11 out of 12 variables with significant moderate to very high correlation (r > 0.5, p < 0.05) with force platform variables in open eyes, closed eyes, and unipedal conditions, while wearable devices had 8 out of 12 variables with moderate to very high correlation (r > 0.5, p < 0.05) with force platform variables under the same task conditions. Significant reliabilities were found in closed eye conditions for smartphones and wearables. The smartphone and wearable devices had concurrent validity for the static balance evaluation and the smartphone had better validity results than the wearables for the static balance evaluation.

Reliability, Validity and Utility of Inertial Sensor Systems for Postural Control Assessment in Sport Science and Medicine Applications: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in mobile sensing and computing technology have provided a means to objectively and unobtrusively quantify postural control. This has resulted in the rapid development and evaluation of a series of wearable inertial sensor-based assessments. However, the validity, reliability and clinical utility of such systems is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to synthesise and evaluate studies that have investigated the ability of wearable inertial sensor systems to validly and reliably quantify postural control performance in sports science and medicine applications.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy utilising the PRISMA guidelines was employed to identify eligible articles through ScienceDirect, Embase and PubMed databases. In total, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated and qualitatively synthesised under two main headings: measurement validity and measurement reliability. Furthermore, studies that investigated the utility of these systems in clinical populations were summarised and discussed.

RESULTS

After duplicate removal, 4374 articles were identified with the search strategy, with 47 papers included in the final review. In total, 28 studies investigated validity in healthy populations, and 15 studies investigated validity in clinical populations; 13 investigated the measurement reliability of these sensor-based systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of wearable inertial sensors for sports science and medicine postural control applications is an evolving field. To date, research has primarily focused on evaluating the validity and reliability of a heterogeneous set of assessment protocols, in a laboratory environment. While researchers have begun to investigate their utility in clinical use cases such as concussion and musculoskeletal injury, most studies have leveraged small sample sizes, are of low quality and use a variety of descriptive variables, assessment protocols and sensor-mounting locations. Future research should evaluate the clinical utility of these systems in large high-quality prospective cohort studies to establish the role they may play in injury risk identification, diagnosis and management. This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 10 August 2018 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018106363): https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=106363 .

The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Kaiser Physical Activity Survey for Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of physical activity by condition-specific surveys provides more accurate results than generic physical activity questionnaires. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey (KPAS) in Turkish pregnant women.

METHODS

In the translation and cultural adaptation of the KPAS, the 6-phase guidelines recommended in the literature were followed. The study included a total of 151 pregnant women who were assessed using the Turkish version of KPAS, the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the SenseWear Pro3 Armband. To determine the test-retest reliability, the KPAS was reapplied after 7 days. The psychometric properties of KPAS were analyzed with respect to internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity.

RESULTS

Cronbach α coefficient indicating the internal consistency of the Turkish KPAS was found to be .60 to .80, showing moderate reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was very strong (intraclass correlation coefficient: .96-.98). The total KPAS scores were found to be moderately correlated with the total Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire score and the total energy expenditure value on the SenseWear Pro3 Armband.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that KPAS is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating physical activity in Turkish pregnant women in different aspects.

Reliability and validity of Turkish version of pregnancy physical activity questionnaire (PPAQ) in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2019;40:176-181. [PMID: 31466492 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606178]

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication during pregnancy. Evaluation of the quantitative physical activity in diabetic pregnant women is critical. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) in Turkish patients with GDM. A total of 120 pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 44 years with GDM were included. The reliability of the questionnaire was measured by internal consistency and analysis of 2-week test-retest reliability. Of the patients, 74 completed the test-retest procedure. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing the PPAQ with the Short Form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in 36 patients. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient scores varied between 0.72 and 0.95. The Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that the PPAQ total activity values were statistically significantly correlated with the total values of IPAQ-Short Form (r = 0.410 and p = .030). In conclusion, the Turkish version of the PPAQ is a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of the physical activity level of pregnant women with GDM.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? The pregnancy physical activity questionnaire (PPAQ) developed in 2004 by Chasan-Taber et al.; is a simple and short questionnaire measuring the frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity in pregnant women. To date, this questionnaire has been translated into many languages and has been used in a number of studies.What do the results of this study add? The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the PPAQ in Turkish pregnant women with GDM. On the basis of our study results, we suggest that the Turkish version of the PPAQ is a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of the physical activity level of pregnant women with GDM.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Evaluation of the quantitative physical activity in diabetic pregnant women may contribute to gain a better understanding of the role of physical activity during treatment and may be useful to compare the results of different studies carried out in different places more effectively.

Acceleration Pattern and Neuromuscular Response of the Spine and Ankle During the Limits-of-Stability Test

Kuo, FC. Acceleration pattern and neuromuscular response of the spine and ankle during the limits-of-stability test. J Strength Cond Res 34(3): 857-865, 2020-This study aimed to explore the acceleration amplitude, frequency, and electromyography (EMG) activity at the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities under various platform-stability settings. Thirty two young adults (16 men and 16 women) were recruited from a university in Taiwan. A balance system for limits-of-stability testing was used with 2 platform stability settings (i.e., level 4 and static). An inertial motion system and a telemetry EMG system were used to record kinematic and EMG data. Consequently, compared with the level 4 setting, the static-level setting required greater thoracic lateral flexion, pelvic course, and pelvic pitch; greater acceleration amplitudes of the spine, pelvis, and thigh; and greater acceleration frequencies at the shin and ankle. Participants exhibited a significant increase in knee flexion, ankle abduction, foot acceleration, and activity of the rectus femoris and tibialis anterior muscles when the platform stability was decreased. In addition, higher median frequencies of the spine and pelvis and larger amplitudes of the foot were observed under the level 4 setting. The men exhibited a larger range of motion in lumbar joint and thoracic rotation than did the women. To maintain stability, subjects must readjust their head, spine, and ankle movement amplitudes and frequencies depending on the platform stability. The study findings suggest the use of static platform settings for spine control facilitation and unstable platform settings for proprioception and muscle strengthening of lower extremity.

Center of Pressure Trace and Sensory Components of the Limits of Stability Test in Older Adults With Vertebral Compression Fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with vertebral compression fracture (VCF) usually exhibit impaired postural control and consequently are at an increased risk of falling. This study aimed to assess the sensory and kinematic components of the limits of stability (LOS) test in patients with VCF.

METHODS

This study enrolled 13 adults with VCF (VCF group), 13 older adults without spinal deformity (NE group), and 13 young adults (NY group). The Biodex balance system was employed to calculate the balance score and the LOS of participants. An inertia motion system was used to record kinematic data. The center of pressure signals of postural stability and LOS were used to calculate the frequency power spectrum for interpreting the sensory component.

RESULTS

Compared with the NY group, the VCF group exhibited a longer reaction time and lower balance scores and used a higher median frequency in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior direction of body acceleration to perform the LOS test. The required ranges of hip rotation and pelvic pitch were significantly higher in the older adult group than in the NY group. In the postural stability test, the VCF group exhibited significantly higher frequency power in the 0.01- to 0.5-Hz band (visual and vestibular) under both the eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions than the other groups. In the LOS test, the VCF group also exhibited lower sensory component activity than the other groups, particularly in vestibular function (0.1-0.5 Hz).

CONCLUSIONS

Both musculoskeletal degeneration and sensory integration impairment may contribute to poor direction control and a longer reaction time in patients with VCF.

The Turkish version of the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to translate the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, adapt it for use with Turkish subjects and determine its reliability and validity. [Subjects and Methods] The Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire was translated into Turkish and administered twice at 7–14-day intervals to pregnant women to assess the test-retest reliability. Cronbach’s α was used for internal consistency, and the inter-rater correlation coefficient was used to calculate the test-retest reliability. The Turkish Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were used to estimate validity. [Results] The internal consistency during the first and third trimesters of pregnancy was excellent, with Cronbach’s α values of 0.93 and 0.95, respectively. The mean interval between the two assessments was 11.1 ± 2.1 days. The correlation coefficient between the total activity measured by the Turkish version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire estimates of the total metabolic equivalent were fair to poor during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy (r = 0.17, r = 0.17, r = 0.21, respectively). The Turkish version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire showed fair correlations with the Short Form 36 Health Survey physical component score (r = −0.30) and mental component score (r = −0.37) for the first trimester of pregnancy. [Conclusion] The Turkish version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire was found to be reliable and valid for assessing a pregnant woman’s physical activity.