Tokuhashi Scoring System has limited applicability in the majority of patients with spinal cord compression secondary to vertebral metastasis

Preoperative prediction of early mortality after surgery for spinal metastases

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide a convenient preoperative prediction of the risk of early postoperative mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis at our hospital between 2009 and 2021. Preoperative blood test data of all patients were collected, and the survival time was calculated by dividing the blood data. A multivariate analysis was conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The study population included 83 patients (average: 64.5 years), 22 of whom died within 3 months. The most common lesion was the thoracic spine, and incomplete paralysis was observed in 57 patients. The surgical methods included posterior implant fixation (n = 17), posterior decompression (n = 31), and posterior decompression with fixation (n = 35). In the univariate analysis, the presence of abnormal values was significantly associated with postoperative survival in six preoperative blood collection items (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, white blood cell, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and lactate dehydrogenase). In a multivariate analysis, four test items (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, and lactate dehydrogenase) were identified as independent prognostic factors.Comparing cases with ≥3 abnormal values among the above four items (high-risk group; n = 23) and those with ≤2 (low-risk group; n = 60), there was a significant difference in survival time. In addition, it was possible to predict cases of early death within 3 months after surgery with 73% sensitivity and 89% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that four preoperative blood test abnormalities (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein white blood cell, and lactate dehydrogenase) indicated the possibility of early death within 3 months after surgery.

Quality of life in patients with malignant spinal cord compression: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an oncological emergency that may result in a devastating combination of malignancy and disability. Existing quality of life (QoL) questionnaires commonly used in MSCC literature (EORTC QLQ-C30, BM-22, Brief Pain Inventory, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes) may not capture all the commonly reported symptoms and lack specificity to MSCC. The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine unmet patient needs and underreported QoL issues and compile a comprehensive list of QoL issues. The secondary objective of this review is to compile all existing QoL tools and questionnaires and determine whether any QoL issues are not addressed in the existing tools currently used in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and February 6, 2023, to compile all QoL issues and existing questionnaires used to assess QoL in patients with MSCC. All study designs were included given that they discussed QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review identified the most frequently discussed QoL issues in the literature studying MSCC. This included direct symptoms of MSCC such as back pain, paralysis, limb weakness/numbness, and urinary/bowel incontinence. Indirect symptoms coming from radiotherapy treatment such as dysphagia, painful swallowing, mouth pain, dry mouth, diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting were also noted. Other symptoms resulting from corticosteroid treatment included difficulty sleeping, blurring of vision, weight gain, and mood disturbance. Patients also experienced psychosocial issues such as anxiety, depression, emotional distress, low self-esteem, concerns about dependence on others, concerns about getting home, and fear about their prognosis and future.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC and QoL tools capturing these issues. Relevance of QoL issues identified in this systematic review must be prospectively validated by patients and healthcare professionals with experience in treating MSCC.

COMPLICATIONS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SPINAL METASTASES

ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate the complications of surgical treatment in a group of patients with spinal metastasis with epidural compression, undergoing surgical treatment. Methods: This is a comparative retrospective study (level of evidence III), which evaluated 96 patients with spinal metastases undergoing surgical treatment. Intra- and postoperative complications were obtained from the patients’ medical records and correlated with the following clinical characteristics: tumor type, tumor location, neurological deficit, age, number of affected vertebrae, Tokuhashi scale, Tomita scale, Karnofsky performance scale, and type of approach. Results: Complications of surgical treatment were observed in 29 (30.20%) patients. Surgical wound infection was the most frequent complication, observed in 15% of patients. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of spinal metastases presents complications in about 30% of patients and their occurrence should be considered in the treatment planning, weighing the risks and benefits for achieving the treatment goals. Level III evidence; Retrospective Study.

Prospective validation of a clinical prediction score for survival in patients with spinal metastases: the New England Spinal Metastasis Score

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS) was proposed as an intuitive and accessible prognostic tool for predicting survival in patients with spinal metastases. We designed an appropriately powered, prospective, longitudinal investigation to validate the NESMS.

PURPOSE

To prospectively validate the NESMS.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal observational cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients, aged 18 and older, presenting for treatment with spinal metastatic disease.

OUTCOME MEASURES

One-year mortality (primary); 6-month mortality and mortality at any time point following enrollment (secondary).

METHODS

The date of enrollment was set as time zero for all patients. The NESMS was assigned based on data collected at the time of enrollment. Patients were prospectively followed to one of two predetermined end-points: death, or survival at 365 days following enrollment. Survival was visually assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and then analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, followed by Bayesian regression to assess for robustness of point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

This study included 180 patients enrolled between 2017 and 2018. Mortality within 1-year occurred in 56% of the cohort. Using NESMS 3 as the referent, those with a score of 2 had significantly greater odds of mortality (odds ratio 7.04; 95% CI 2.47, 20.08), as did those with a score of 1 (odds ratio 31.30; 95% CI 8.82, 111.04). A NESMS score of 0 was associated with perfect prediction, as 100% of individuals with this score were deceased at 1-year. Similar determinations were encountered for mortality at 6-months and overall.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the NESMS and demonstrates its utility in prognosticating survival for patients with spinal metastatic disease, irrespective of selected treatment strategy. This is the first study to prospectively validate a prognostic utility for patients with spinal metastases. The NESMS can be directly applied to patient care, hospital-based practice and health-care policy.

Design of the prospective observational study of spinal metastasis treatment (POST)

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are several prognostic scores available that intend to inform decision-making for patients with spinal metastases. Many of these have not been found to reliably predict survival across the continuum of care. Recently, our group developed the New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS). While the NESMS demonstrated many of the necessary attributes of a useful prediction tool, it has yet to be validated prospectively.

PURPOSE

To describe the prospective observational study of spinal metastasis treatment (POST). This investigation examined the performance of the NESMS, compared its predictive capacity with other scoring systems and determined its ability to identify patients who benefit the most from surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study at two medical centers.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients age 18 and older with spinal metastases involving the spine.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Survival, post-treatment morbidity and health-related quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

The POST study assessed patients at baseline and at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month time-points. During the baseline assessment patient demographics, past medical history and assessment of co-morbidities, surgical history, primary tumor histology, and ambulatory status were recorded along with the designated treatment strategy (eg, operative or nonoperative). The NESMS and other predictive scores for each patient were calculated based on baseline data. Study-specific surveys administered at all time-points consisted of the EuroQuol 5-Dimension and Short-Form (SF)-12, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and PROMIS assessment of global health.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were enrolled in POST from 2017 to 2019. Patients were followed to one of the two predetermined study end-points (ie, mortality, or completion of the 12-month follow-up). Survival was considered the principle dependent variable. Post-treatment morbidity and health-related quality of life outcomes were considered secondarily. Analyses, by aim, relied on Cox proportional hazards regression, repeated measures logistic regression, propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

The POST's findings are anticipated to provide evidence regarding the prognostic capabilities of the NESMS as well as that of other popular grading schemes for survival, post-treatment complications and physical as well as mental function.

Evaluate the characteristics and clinical significance of "toxic twin-leaf" sign in spinal epidural metastases before percutaneous vertebroplasty

Objective

Our study aimed to analyze morphological features of spinal epidural metastases using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and investigate the formation mechanism and clinical significance of the “toxic twin-leaf” sign in spinal epidural metastasis.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively studied 108 patients with spinal epidural metastases who underwent MRI. Patients were divided into “toxic twin-leaf” sign group (group A) and irregular group (group B). Chi-square test was used to analyze data on sex, vertebra location, presence of fracture in the corresponding vertebral body, involvement of the corresponding pedicle, and the primary tumor. Further, group data were analyzed using the rank sum test; p ​< ​0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The “twin-leaf” sign was noted in 88 cases with 136 epidural masses and 20 cases of irregular shape in 108 patients; the “toxic twin-leaf” sign accounted for 87.18% of spinal epidural metastases. A difference between groups in the vertebra location (p ​< ​0.01) was observed, but no differences were found in sex, presence of fractures in the corresponding vertebral body, involvement of the corresponding pedicle, and primary tumor (p ​> ​0.05). Intergroup differences in the rate of spinal stenosis on axial and sagittal images were significant.

Conclusions

MRI axial sequences clearly revealed the morphology of spinal epidural metastases. Detection of the “toxic twin-leaf” sign in spinal epidural metastases was of great clinical significance. Furthermore, determining the degree of spinal stenosis in the axial sequence provided a more accurate evaluation of patients’ condition compared to the sagittal sequence.

SPINAL METASTASIS: DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS - INTEGRATIVE REVIEW FROM 2012 TO 2017

ABSTRACT Care of the patient with spinal metastasis is challenging. The topic of this article is the treatment and prognosis of spinal metastases, aiming to enumerate and analyze literature that addresses this treatment and prognosis. The methodology used was an integrative review in the Virtual Health Library. Nineteen articles were identified demonstrating that there is research and scientific production in this area. The thematic units and their categories are: treatment decision - prognostic scales or clinical neurological evaluation; types of treatment - minimally invasive and/or traditional; and effectiveness of prognostic scales higher or lower probability of success, which provide insight into the different possibilities of patient evaluation and their applicability in practice. When making the diagnosis, planning the treatment, and establishing a prognosis, the professional must be in sync with current precepts and act based on the objective and subjective characteristics of the patients, such as beliefs and values, which although immeasurable, influence the survival and the effectiveness of treatment. Level of evidence I; Integrative Review.

Research on the predicting power of the revised Tokuhashi system: how much time can surgery give to patients with short life expectancy?

Object

The primary treatment option for symptomatic metastatic spinal tumors is surgery. Prognostic systems are designed to assist in the establishment of the indication and the choice of surgical methodology. The best-known prognostic system is the revised Tokuhashi system, which has a predictive ability of about 60%. In our study, we are attempting to find the reason for its poor predictive ability, despite its proper separation ability.

Methods

We have designed a one-center-based retrospective clinical trial, by which we would like to test the feasibility and the inaccuracy of the revised Tokuhashi system. In our database, there are 329 patients who underwent surgery. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results

A significant increase in survival time was observed in the ‘conservative’ category. Earlier studies reported OS 0.15 at the 180-day control time, in contrast with our 0.38 OS value. The literature suggested supportive care for this category, but in our population, every patient underwent surgery. Our population passes the 0.15 OS value on day 475. We propose an adjustment of the Tokuhashi category scores. We observed significant success in resolving pain. Motor functions were improved or stabilized compared to changes in vegetative dysfunction.

Conclusion

According to our results, the Tokuhashi scoring system makes very conservative predictions and prefers non-surgical palliative or supportive care. Surgical treatment increases the life expectancy of patients in poor condition. We propose modifying the therapeutic options of the revised Tokuhashi system, taking into consideration modern spine surgery techniques.

Functional outcomes and survival after surgical stabilization for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer with spinal metastasis of the thoracic and lumbar spines: a retrospective comparison between epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy groups

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the surgical results between targeted therapy and post-operative chemotherapy for patients with spinal metastasis of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

SETTING

Single-center study at an academic orthopedic department in Taiwan.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients were treated surgically for spinal metastasis of inoperable NSCLC with long posterior instrumentation with or without posterior decompression according to the patient's neurologic status. Post-operative radiotherapy of the spinal lesion and targeted therapy or chemotherapy were done following surgery after the surgical wound healed. Post-operative clinical outcomes and survival were evaluated and compared between these two groups. The overall survival represented survival from the date of diagnosis to death.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were grouped as the targeted therapy group and 30 patients as the chemotherapy group. The overall median survival times were 12.0 and 10.0 months in the targeted therapy and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Sixty-two patients were able to walk with or without an aid postoperatively. There was no significant difference observed between these two groups in terms of pain relief, neurologic improvement, ambulatory improvement, and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical stabilization with or without laminectomy improved functional outcomes in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer, and post-operative functional outcomes were similar between chemotherapy and targeted therapy groups. A longer survival was observed with targeted therapy for the patients whose NSCLC was diagnosed before spinal metastasis, however, the longer survival was not statistically significant.

Prediction of survival in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases: Comparison between the Tokuhashi score and expert oncologists

BACKGROUND

Existing scoring systems have suboptimal accuracy in prognosticating patients with spinal metastases. Currently, there is no superior method in predicting survival. This study aims to compare the accuracy of survival prediction by expert oncologists versus the revised Tokuhashi scores with actual survivals in a cohort of symptomatic spinal metastases patients.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgical treatment for metastatic spinal tumours in a tertiary hospital between January 2011 to December 2015 were reviewed. Each patient's data was reconstructed into an anonymised clinical scenario and presented independently to five blinded attending oncologists with at least three years' post fellowship experience. They were surveyed for survival prediction twice at no less than four weeks' interval apart; the test-retest reliability was examined. The agreement of their prognostication and modified Tokuhashi scores were compared with actual survivals.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included during the study period. The mean age at presentation was 61.1 years (range, 41 to 79), and mean actual survival was 21.6 months (range, 1 to 68). Cohen's kappa agreement with actual survival was higher by oncologists' estimation (0.52) than by revised Tokuhashi score prediction (0.31) (p = 0.018). Intra-class correlation showed high inter-reliability (0.71) between the five oncologists and a high test-retest reliability (0.69) between both rounds of the survey.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that expert oncologists provided more accurate survival prediction than revised Tokuhashi scores in patients with spinal metastases. Future studies are required to identify factors in their assessment that led to improved accuracy.

Analysis of Four Scoring Systems for the Prognosis of Patients with Metastasis of the Vertebral Column

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic spinal diseases are common health problems and there is no consensus on the appropriate treatment of metastases in several conditions. Using clinical measures (e.g., survival time and functional status), prognosis prediction systems advise on the appropriate interventions. The aim of this article is to assess and compare 4 widely used scoring systems (revised Tokuhashi, Tomita, van der Linden, and modified Bauer scores) on a single-center cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective study was designed of 329 patients who were subjected to surgery because of metastatic spinal diseases. Subpopulations according to the classifications of the 4 scoring systems were identified. The overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier formula. The difference between the survival curves of subpopulations was analyzed with log-rank tests. The consistency rates for the 4 scoring systems are calculated as well.

RESULTS

The follow-up period was 8 years. The median survival time was 222 days. The overall survival of prognostic categories in 3 scoring systems was significantly different from each other, but we found no differences between the categories of the van der Linden system. In this cohort, the revised Tokuhashi system gave the best approximation for survival, with a mean predictive capability 60.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of 4 standard scoring systems showed that 3 were self-consistent, although none of systems was able to predict the survival in our cohort. Based on the predictive capability, the revised Tokuhashi system may provide the best predictions with careful examination of individual cases.

Surgical intervention for vertebral metastases may benefit lung cancer patients no less than other patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Spinal metastasis is considered to have a worse prognosis in lung cancer than in other cancers, but recent clinical studies report improved overall survival of lung cancer. We compared the postoperative prognoses of vertebral metastatic tumors from lung with other types of cancer.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2015, 31 Japanese patients (mean age 73 years, range 55-88 years; 19 males, 12 females) underwent surgery for spinal metastasis at our center. We observed patients retrospectively in March 2016, dividing them into groups by cancer type: lung (LK group, n = 10); prostate, breast, or thyroid (PB group, n = 12); and other (OT group, n = 9). We compared survival and revised Tokuhashi score, which provides a basis for choosing a treatment course. Neurologic status was graded before and after surgery using the Frankel system.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16.5 months (range 1-62 months). Only seven of 31 patients (22.6%) were alive at final follow-up. Frankel grade significantly improved postoperatively only in the LK (P = 0.01) and PB (P = 0.048) groups. Revised Tokuhashi score differed across groups (P < 0.0001), and was significantly lower in the LK group than in the PB group (P = 0.00) and OT group (P = 0.02). Postoperative survival was significantly shorter in the LK group than in the PB group (P = 0.01) but did not differ between the LK and OT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised Tokuhashi score may underestimate the survival of lung cancer patients, who may derive the same benefit from surgical intervention as those with vertebral metastasis from other cancer types.

Is there a relationship between spinal instability in neoplastic disease and Tokuhashi scoring system?

Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) classification evaluates spinal stability by adding together six radiographic and clinical components. The objective of this study was to verify the association between SINS and Tokuhashi scoring system (TSS) score. Fifty-eight patients with vertebral metastases were admitted from 2010 to 2014 at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. They were evaluated according to their SINS and Tokuhashi SS score. Fourteen patients (24.13 %) scored from 0 to 6 points (stable spine), 37 (63.79 %) scored from 7 to 12 (potentially unstable), and 7 (12.06 %) scored from 13 to 18 (unstable). In stable spine patients according to SINS, the mean TSS score was 9.2. In potentially unstable spine patients, the mean TSS score was 8.24. In unstable spine patients, mean TSS score was 6.28. There was a statistically significant difference of the TSS score between stable and unstable patients. After evaluating TSS score in each patient, the worse the SINS, the worse was also the TSS score.

Survival analysis in patients with metastatic spinal disease: the influence of surgery, histology, clinical and neurologic status

Spine is the most common site for skeletal metastasis in patients with malignancy. Vertebral involvement quantification, neurological status, general health status and primary tumor histology are factors to set surgical planning and therapeutic targets. We evaluated the impact of general clinical and neurological status, histologic type and surgery in survival. Method : The study sample consisted of consecutive patients admitted from July 2010 to January 2013 for treatment. Results : Sixty eight patients were evaluated. 23 were female and 45 were male. Main primary neoplasic sites were: breast, prostate, lung/pleura and linfoproliferative. Thirty three out of 68 received surgical treatment, 2 received percutaneous biopsy and 33 had nonsurgical treatment. Survival : Log Rank curves revealed no statistical significant difference according to histological type, surgical approach and Frankel Score. Karnofsky Score was statistically different. Conclusion : Histological type and clinical status were statistically associated with life expectancy in vertebral metastatic disease.

The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI): an external validation study

PURPOSE

The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI) was recently reported as an adjunct in the management of metastatic spinal disease. Based on the tumour type and a general condition score, survivorship is predicted. We aimed to externally validate this new score.

METHODS

We assessed the survivorship of 121 patients identified from a prospectively collated database in the National Spinal Injuries Unit in the Republic of Ireland. Actual survivorship was calculated according to the tumour subtype and general conditioning, according to the Karnofsky Performance Score (OSRI = Primary Tumour Pathology + (2-General Conditioning Score)). Our results were then compared to those previously published.

RESULTS

45.5 % were female (n = 55). The mean age at presentation was 61.5 years (range 23-85). Breast and prostate cancers were the most frequent diseases encountered. The actual survival in our cohort closely mirrored the predicted survival, according to the equation used to calculate the OSRI with an overall strong correlation found (r = 0.798, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found that the OSRI is a simple to use scoring system. We found a strong correlation in our results with the predicted survivorship based on the OSRI. The OSRI can be used as a useful adjunct in the management of patient with metastatic disease of the spine.

Prognostic parameters and spinal metastases: a research study

OBJECT

To identify pre-operative prognostic parameters for survival in patients with spinal epidural neoplastic metastasis when the primary tumour is unknown.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent surgery for spinal epidural neoplastic metastases between February 1997 and January 2011. The inclusion criteria were as follows: known post-operative survival period, a Karnofsky Performance Score equal to or greater than 30 points and a post-operative neoplastic metastasis histological type. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate post-operative survival, and the Log-Rank test was used for statistical inference.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients who underwent 52 surgical procedures were identified. The mean age at the time of spinal surgery was 53.92 years (std. deviation, 19.09). The median survival after surgery was 70 days (95% CI 49.97-90.02), and post-operative mortality occurred within 6 months in 38 (73.07%) patients. Lung cancer, prostate cancer, myeloma and lymphoma, the 4 most common primary tumour types, affected 32 (61.53%) patients. The three identified prognostic parameters were the following: pre-operative walking incapacity (American Spinal Injury Association, A and B), present in 86.53% of the patients (p-value = 0.107); special care dependency (Karnofsky Performance Score, 10-40 points), present in 90.38% of the patients (p-value = 0.322); and vertebral epidural neoplastic metastases that were in contact with the thecal sac (Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini, sector D), present in 94.23% of the patients (p-value = 0.643). When the three secondary prognostic parameters were combined, the mean post-operative survival was 45 days; when at least one was present, the survival was 82 days (p-value = 0.175).

CONCLUSIONS

Walking incapacity, special care dependency and contact between the neoplastic metastases and the thecal sac can help determine the ultimate survival of this patient population and, potentially, which patients would benefit from surgery versus palliation alone. A 2- to 3-month post-operative survival period justified surgical treatment.