Physicians with self-diagnosed gadolinium deposition disease: a case series

Contrast Agents in Breast MRI: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) has become an essential modality in breast cancer diagnosis and management. It is particularly used for locoregional staging, high-risk screening, monitoring treatment response, and assessing complications related to breast implants. The integration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) enhances the sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRI by providing detailed morphological and functional insights, particularly highlighting tumor neoangiogenesis. Despite its advantages, CE-MRI faces challenges such as high costs, limited accessibility, and concerns about gadolinium retention in tissues, prompting ongoing research into safer, high-relaxivity contrast agents like gadopiclenol. Advances in multiparametric imaging, including dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging, have refined diagnostic accuracy, enabling precise staging, and treatment planning. The introduction of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) protocols offers a promising solution to barriers of cost and scan duration, maintaining diagnostic efficacy while improving patient accessibility and comfort. Future innovations in contrast agents, imaging protocols, and patient-centered approaches hold the potential to further enhance the utility of breast MRI, ensuring equitable and effective application in global healthcare systems.

Update on Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Safety, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media

Since its introduction more than 35 years ago, gadolinium-enhanced MRI has fundamentally changed medical practice. Although extraordinarily safe, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) may have side effects. Four distinct safety considerations include acute allergiclike reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), gadolinium deposition, and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure. Acute reactions after GBCA administration are uncommon-far less than with iodinated contrast agents-and, although rare, serious reactions can occur. NSF is a rare but serious sclerodermalike condition occurring in patients with kidney failure after exposure to American College of Radiology (ACR) group I GBCAs. Group II and III GBCAs are considered lower risk, and, through their use, NSF has largely been eliminated. Unrelated to NSF, retention of trace amounts of gadolinium in the brain and other organs has been recognized for over a decade. Deposition occurs with all agents, although linear agents appear to deposit more than macrocyclic agents. Importantly, to date, no data show any adverse biologic or clinical effects from gadolinium deposition, even with normal kidney function. This article summarizes the latest safety evidence of commercially available GBCAs with a focus on new agents, discusses updates to the ACR NSF GBCA safety classifications, and describes approaches for strengthening the evidence needed for regulatory decisions.

The safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents

Gadolinium-based contrast agents are increasingly used in clinical practice. While these pharmaceuticals are verified causal agents in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, there is a growing body of literature supporting their role as causal agents in symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure after intravenous use and encephalopathy following intrathecal administration. Gadolinium-based contrast agents are multidentate organic ligands that strongly bind the metal ion to reduce the toxicity of the metal. The notion that cationic gadolinium dissociates from these chelates and causes the disease is prevalent among patients and providers. We hypothesize that non-ligand-bound (soluble) gadolinium will be exceedingly low in patients. Soluble, ionic gadolinium is not likely to be the initial step in mediating any disease. The Kidney Institute of New Mexico was the first to identify gadolinium-rich nanoparticles in skin and kidney tissues from magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in rodents. In 2023, they found similar nanoparticles in the kidney cells of humans with normal renal function, likely from contrast agents. We suspect these nanoparticles are the mediators of chronic toxicity from magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. This article explores associations between gadolinium contrast and adverse health outcomes supported by clinical reports and rodent models.

Near-cure in patients with Gadolinium deposition disease undergoing intravenous DTPA chelation

Purpose

To demonstrate and evaluate factors contributing to near-cures in patients with Gadolinium Deposition Disease (GDD) undergoing intravenous (IV) DTPA chelation.

Methods

Patients who had undergone or are currently undergoing DTPA chelation for GDD were included in this report based on their medical records that showed their perceived improvement was at least 80% back to normal. A survey was developed that included factors commonly reported by patients treated in one clinic to determine if these 'near-cured' (pre-MRI baseline health) individuals possessed certain factors and lacked others. The anonymized survey was emailed to these individuals by the principal treating physician, the only investigator not blinded to the subjects. This report describes clinical documentation of patient status and their underlying factors in individuals treated by the primary author, and no research was performed. The survey was sent to sixteen individuals; Fourteen patients completed it (10 females; 41.1 ± 11.2 y/o).

Results

The most common factor was the administration of ≤5 lifetime doses of a Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents (GBCA) (12/14). Unconfounded agents triggering GDD were seen in nine subjects. Most subjects (12/14) initiated chelation in the first year after the causative GBCA, and most (11/14) underwent ≤10 chelations with DTPA. Good healthcare status prior to MRI was observed in 5 subjects. The majority (11/14) described their immune status as strong. Severe physical disability prior to chelation was seen in 1.

Conclusion

Subjects with GDD can experience near-cure with IV DTPA chelation. Factors surveyed that predict near-cure include the start of chelation in the first year, few GBCA administrations, and good health status before MRI with GBCA injection. Nonetheless, a few patients with predictors of less successful outcomes still experienced near-cure.

Skin Toxicity After Exposure to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Normal Renal Function, Using Clinical Approved Doses: Current Status of Preclinical and Clinical Studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to summarize the current preclinical and clinical evidence on the association between exposure to gadolinium (Gd) compounds and skin toxicity in a setting similar to clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and PubMed references from January 2000 to December 2022 was performed using keywords related to gadolinium deposition and its effects on the skin, such as "gadolinium," "gadolinium-based contrast agents," "skin," "deposition," and "toxicity." In addition, cross-referencing was added when appropriate. For preclinical in vitro studies, we included all the studies that analyzed the response of human dermal fibroblasts to exposure to various gadolinium compounds. For preclinical animal studies and clinical studies, we included only those that analyzed animals or patients with preserved renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), using a dosage of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) similar to that commonly applied (0.1 mmol/kg).

RESULTS

Forty studies were selected. Preclinical findings suggest that Gd compounds can produce profibrotic responses in the skin in vitro, through the activation and proliferation of dermal fibroblasts and promoting their myofibroblast differentiation. Gadolinium influences the process of collagen production and the collagen content of skin, by increasing the levels of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. Preclinical animal studies show that Gd can deposit in the skin with higher concentrations when linear GBCAs are applied. However, these deposits decrease over time and are not associated with obvious macroscopic or histological modifications. The clinical relevance of GBCAs in inducing small fiber neuropathy remains to be determined. Clinical studies show that Gd is detectable in the skin and hair of subjects with normal renal function in higher concentrations after intravenous administration of linear compared with macrocyclic GBCA. However, these deposits decrease over time and are not associated with cutaneous or histological modifications. Also, subclinical dermal involvement related to linear GBCA exposure may be detectable on brain MRI. There is no conclusive evidence to support a causal relationship between GBCA administration at the clinical dose and cutaneous manifestations in patients with normal renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadolinium can produce profibrotic responses in the skin, especially acting on fibroblasts, as shown by preclinical in vitro studies. Gadolinium deposits are detectable in the skin even in subjects with normal renal function with higher concentrations when linear GBCAs are used, as confirmed by both preclinical animal and human studies. There is no proof to date of a cause-effect relationship between GBCA administration at clinical doses and cutaneous consequences in patients with normal renal function. Multiple factors, yet to be determined, should be considered for sporadic patients with normal renal function who develop clinical skin manifestations temporally related to GBCA administration.

Use of Real-Life Safety Data From International Pharmacovigilance Databases to Assess the Importance of Symptoms Associated With Gadolinium Exposure

OBJECTIVE

Recent scientific publications have reported cases of patients who complained from a variety of symptoms after they received a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). The aim of this study was to appreciate the importance of these clinical manifestations in the overall population by assessing the weight of "symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure" (SAGE) among the bulk of safety experiences reported to major health authorities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure were identified from a review of the scientific literature, and the corresponding preferred terms were searched in each system organ class (SOC) category recorded in the European and North American pharmacovigilance databases EudraVigilance (EV) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), respectively. The numbers of SAGE per preferred term, and cumulatively per SOC, were recorded and their weights in the overall spectrum of adverse events (AEs) were determined for each GBCA.

RESULTS

The analysis of the selected AEs revealed a significantly higher SAGE weight for gadobenate dimeglumine (EV: 25.83%, FAERS: 32.24%) than for gadoteridol (EV: 15.51%; FAERS: 21.13%) and significantly lower SAGE weights for gadobutrol (EV: 7.75%; FAERS: 13.31%) and gadoterate meglumine (EV: 8.66%; FAERS: 12.99%). A similar ranking was found for most of the SOCs except for "nervous system disorders," probably owing to a limitation in the methods of data selection. Furthermore, this analysis showed a greater percentage of reports mentioning a decrease in the quality of life of the patients when they were exposed to gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoteridol than to gadobutrol or gadoterate meglumine.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that SAGE represent a significant percentage of the bulk of AEs reported to the health authorities for each GBCA. It provided real-life arguments suggesting that SAGE may be more prevalent with linear than macrocyclic GBCAs and that gadoteridol may present a higher SAGE risk than the other macrocyclic contrast agents.

Gadolinium Deposition Disease: A Case Report and the Prevalence of Enhanced MRI Procedures Within the Veterans Health Administration

Background

Gadolinium (Gd) usage in the Veterans Health Administration is increasing and patients with renal disease are frequently exposed. Gd is not entirely eliminated within 24 hours after administration, which may pose long-term adverse effects.

Case Presentation

A Vietnam-era veteran aged > 70 years presented for evaluation of Gd-based contrast agent-induced chronic multisymptom illness. In the course of his routine clinical care, he was exposed to repeated Gd-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging studies. After his second Gd-based contrast agent exposure, he noted rash, pain, headaches, and hoarseness. Years after the exposure to the contrast agents, he continued to have detectable Gd in urine and serum.

Conclusions

Practitioners should be aware of long-term intracellular Gd retention (including the brain) as patients increasingly turn to consultants with concerns about Gd deposition disease. Data from patient advocates demonstrate that Gd is eliminated in intermediate and long phases, which may represent a multicompartment model. The commercialization of Gd use in imaging studies is outpacing the science addressing the long-term consequences of harboring this alien, toxic, nonphysiologic rare earth metal.

Severity of Flare Reactions in Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetate Chelations: Report on Different Immune Dampening Strategies in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report early clinical experience with various forms of immune dampening to mitigate the expected flare reaction in patients suffering from gadolinium deposition disease (GDD) receiving DTPA chelation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were clinical subjects, and no prospective research was performed on them. The study included 31 consecutive patients (21 women; age, 46.2 ± 12.5 years). The diagnosis of GDD was clinically made. The severity of the flare over the week after each chelation session was rated on a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is negligible, 10 is intolerably severe). Patients were followed for up to 5 chelation sessions. Four immune dampening strategies were used: (1) no concurrent treatment; (2) antihistamine plus montelukast (AH); (3) steroid/antihistamine taper postchelation (SAHT); and (4) steroid/antihistamine extending from prechelation to 5 days postchelation (extended hypersensitivity medication regimen; EHMR). The data were analyzed with generalized linear mixed models and with linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 102 flare scores were obtained at different time points. Ten patients underwent 5 chelations. The severity of the flare after the first chelation was significantly higher in cases of no concurrent therapy (8.4 ± 2.6) and AH (7 ± 1.4) compared with SAHT (6 ± 1.3) and EHMR (5 ± 1.1). Patients who underwent SAHT and EHMR experienced less severity of flare after the first chelation (P = 0.0049 and P = 0.0005, respectively). Considering all time points, the results were also significantly better with SAHT and EHMR.

CONCLUSION

Based on early clinical experience, EHMR seems to manage flare reactions in DTPA chelation well. This strategy may represent the first standard therapy in patients with GDD.

Symptoms Associated with Gadolinium Exposure (SAGE): A Suggested Term

In this article, members of the American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media propose a new term for symptoms reported after intravascular exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents-Symptoms Associated with Gadolinium Exposure, or SAGE. This term is advocated in lieu of other proposed nomenclature that presumes a causal relationship that has not yet been scientifically verified. The purpose of this new term, SAGE, is to assist researchers and clinical providers in describing such symptoms without prematurely causally attributing them to a disease and to standardize reporting of these symptoms to allow for coherent interpretation of related studies.