Adherence to immunosuppressive therapy following liver transplantation: an integrative review

Investigation of the Relationship Between Health Literacy and Adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Heart Transplant Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy after heart transplantation, driven by factors such as patient, caregiver, institutional, policy-related issues, and health literacy, leads to rejection and increased mortality. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between health literacy and adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in heart transplant patients.

METHODS

The sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 57 patients who underwent heart transplantation in a university hospital in Izmir, Turkey. "Sociodemographic and Descriptive Characteristics Form", "Data on Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy Form", "Rapid Estimate of Adult Health Literacy in Medicine (REALM) Scale", and "Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS)" were used to collect the data..

RESULTS

The median score on the REALM scale was 64.00 (IQR = 3.00, min = 18.00, max = 66.00) and 80.7% of the patients scored adequately. The median score of the immunosuppressive therapy adherence scale was 11.00 (IQR= 1.00, min= 5.00, max= 12.00) and 42.1% of the patients scored full score. There was no statistically significant relationship between the median total scores of the REALM and ITAS scales in heart transplant patients (r = 0.181, P = .178).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the majority of heart transplant patients had adequate health literacy. It was found that less than half of these patients adhered to immunosuppressive therapy. Less than half of these patients were found to comply with immunosuppressive therapy. In this study, no relationship was found between health literacy and adherence to immunosuppressive therapy.

Risk Factors for Non-Adherence to Medication for Liver Transplant Patients: An Umbrella Review

Background/Objectives: Liver Transplantation (LT) is the second most common solid organ transplantation. Medication adherence on LT patients is key to avoiding graft failure, mortality, and important quality of life losses. The aim of this study is to identify risk-factors for non-adherence to treatment of liver transplant patients according to reliable published evidence. Methods: An umbrella review within the context of adherence to immunosuppressant medication of LT patients, was conducted. The review was performed in accordance with the principles of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 11 articles were finally included for the review. Non-adherence factors were identified and allocated using the WHO classification of factors for non-adherence. Each of these groups contains a subset of factors that have been shown to influence adherence to medication, directly or indirectly, according to literature findings. Conclusions: The results of the review indicate that sociodemographic factors, factors related to the patient, factors related to the treatment, condition-related and health system-related factors are good categories of predictors for both adherence and non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication in LT patients. This list of factors may help physicians in the treating and recognizing of patients with a potential risk of non-adherence and it could help in the designing of new tools to better understand non-adherence after LT and targeted interventions to promote adherence of LT patients.

Post-liver transplantation patient experience

Given improvements in post-transplant patient and graft survival, there is a growing need to focus on patient experience and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Though liver transplantation can be life-saving, it can also be associated with significant morbidity and complications. Patient HRQOL improves after transplantation, but it may not improve to that of age-matched cohorts. Understanding patient experience and the factors that contribute to it, including physical and psychological health, immunosuppression and medication adherence, return to employment or school, financial burden, and expectations, helps when thinking creatively about potential interventions to improve HRQOL.

Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Who Have Undergo Liver Transplantation: A Case Control Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the adherence to immunosuppressive medication use in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC reasons.

METHODS

The study population was determined as 242 patients with HCC and 1290 patients with non-HCC who had LT performed in our institute between March 2002 and November 2021; all these patients were contacted by phone in March 2022. The sample size was calculated using the MedCalc software program, and the number of patients required in each group was determined as 111 patients. Furthermore, we used the sample.int function, a random integer generator in the R (version 4.1.2) software program. Whereas demographic and clinical parameters were determined as independent variables, the immunosuppressive medication adherence scale (IMAS) score was determined as a dependent variable. Patients were evaluated by the IMAS. This 11-item IMAS scale evaluates the lowest compliance score as 11 and the highest as 55.

RESULTS

Out of a total number of 221 patients, 161 (72%) were men and 60 (27.1%) were women, with a median age of 58 years (IQR: 14); one patient in the non-HCC group was excluded due to lack of data. Among the HCC and non-HCC groups, significant differences were found in terms of the variables of age (P = .003), IMAS score (P < .001), sex (P = .001), working status (P = .004), chronic diseases (P = .008), tacrolimus alone (P < .001), tacrolimus plus everolimus (P < .001), and often medication changes (P < .001). A statistically significant correlation was found between the IMAS score and whether the patients had HCC (P < .001) and frequently changing immunosuppressive drugs (P = .023).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that patients with frequent drug changes or non-HCC etiology had better adherence to immunosuppressive drug use.

Analysis of the impact of liver transplantation as a condition of health

AIM

To analyse the impact that liver transplantation has had on the patient as a condition of their health.

METHOD

A prospective study was carried out, the sample of which was made up of liver transplant patients at the Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital from November 2019 to August 2021. The hospital anxiety and depression scale, the Model for End-stage liver disease sodium and liver fragility index and the Transplant Effects Questionnaire Spanish were used. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The student's t-test was used for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. For non-parametric samples, the Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis's sign were used.

RESULTS

The sample was made up of 60 patients with a mean age of 55.68 years, 70% being men. The mean anxiety and depression scores of the patients improved significantly after liver transplantation. The impact of physical health resulted that those patients with a higher Model for End-stage liver disease sodium were correlated with a greater feeling of guilt after transplantation. Furthermore, greater adherence to immunosuppressive treatment was directly correlated with greater disclosure and inversely with guilt, after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation is a process that impacts the health of patients. Those patients who arrive at the transplant with a more deteriorated physical situation present a greater guilt after the transplant. This impact is inversely correlated with adherence to immunosuppressive treatment. Nurses should intervene in such patients to reduce the impact on adherence to treatment.

Mediating Role of Hope Between Social Support and Self-Management Among Chinese Liver Transplant Recipients: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study

This study aimed to investigate the common status of self-management in liver transplant recipients and to explore the mediating role of hope in the relationship between social support and self-management. Two hundred and ten liver transplant recipients from two tertiary hospitals were included. Questionnaires were used for general demographic information, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Herth Hope Index, and the Self-Management Questionnaire for Liver Transplantation Recipients. Lifestyle management of liver transplant recipients was good, while the communication with physicians, cognitive symptom management, and exercise dimensions were less than satisfactory. Minimal assurance of family and education levels were significantly associated with self-management. Social support was positively correlated with self-management and hope (r = .31, p < .01; r = .40, p < .01). Hope was positively correlated with self-management (r = .39, p < .01). Additionally, the effect of social support on self-management was partially mediated (β = .17, p < .01) by hope. The proportion of mediation of hope was 40.09%. Therefore, well-designed interventions that boost both social support and hope may help improve self-management behavior in liver transplant recipients.

Designing and Psychometric Properties of Appraisal Adherence to Care and Treatment Scale in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Background: Care and treatment adherence are important factors for given good liver transplantation outcomes. Objectives: Design and validate an instrument to appraise adherence to care and treatment in liver transplantation recipients. Methods: A mixed-methods sequential exploratory study was conducted in two phases from 2017 to 2019, in the Liver Transplantation Clinic Tehran, Iran. In the qualitative phase, the concept of care and treatment adherence in liver transplantation recipients extracted by a conventional content analysis was performed on semi-structural interviews that were conducted on 18 liver transplantation recipients that were recruited through purposive sampling technique. Also, two physicians, one nurse coordinator of the liver transplantation team, and two family members were interviewed. The scale was developed based on operational definitions extracted from the qualitative phase. The validity was assessed by face, content, construct validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability was also evaluated by calculating test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha. The exploratory factor analysis was carried out with 286 filled the questionnaire. Results: Four factors were extracted in factor analysis. These factors explained 45.622% of the variance. The final version of the scale consisted of 20 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient reported as 0.889 for the total scale and the intraclass correlation coefficient was reported as 0.912. The confirmatory factor analysis led to a fitting model. Chi-square indices were reported as CMIN/DF = 2.34, NFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.96, and RAMSEA = 0.067. Conclusions: With a four factors structure, validity and reliability of adherence to care and treatment scale are acceptable; therefore, it can be used for appraisal care and treatment adherence in liver transplant recipients.

Good Practices in Transitional Care: continuity of care for patients undergoing liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

to develop a guide of care recommendations for good practices in care transition for adult patients undergoing liver transplantation.

METHODS

a methodological study, based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation in the updated version, II. Care recommendations were sustained by conducting an integrative literature review and qualitative research.

RESULTS

from evidence, three topics emerged: Care Transition Planning; Health Education for Self-Care; Care Management. Each of the central topics has respective subtopics, totaling six, giving rise to 30 care recommendations. Concerning evaluators' scores, in all domains the scores were higher than 90%.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

the proposed guide assists professionals in conducting care transition in liver transplantation, ensuring greater safety for patients in continuity of home care.

Patients' Experiences of Life Challenges After Liver Transplantation: A Qualitative Study

Patients experience a new life with different challenges after liver transplantation (LT). Identifying these challenges can facilitate the improvement of their quality of life. This study aimed to explore patients’ experiences of post-LT life challenges. This qualitative study was performed in 2019 through the content analysis approach. Participants were liver transplant recipients purposively recruited from a LT clinic. Semistructured interviews were conducted for data collection. Data were analyzed through Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis approach. Meaning units were identified and coded, and the codes were grouped into subcategories and categories according to their similarities. In total, 18 transplant recipients were interviewed. Their age mean was 51 years and their transplant age ranged from 4 months to 12 years. Their post-LT life challenges were categorized into 4 main categories, that is, self-care deficit, the need for seeking information, fears and concerns, and hope–despair duality. Nurses and members of LT team are recommended to assess transplant recipients’ life challenges and develop comprehensive plans for managing their challenges and problems and improving their quality of life.

Complications Following Liver Transplant at a Teaching Hospital

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to analyze the liver transplant complications in a reference transplant hospital in southern Brazil.

METHODS

The researchers used a cross-sectional, quantitative, exploratory, and descriptive study, conducted using 103 medical records of patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2011 to 2018. Data were analyzed through median, mean, and standard deviation, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.

RESULTS

There was a higher proportion of men (70.9%), with a mean age of 53.3 years, who had hepatitis C (43.7%). The indication for the procedure was hepatocellular carcinoma (34%). The most frequent complications included pulmonary (26.7%), graft-related complications such as rejection (21.1%), and viral infections (14.4%). In addition, infectious complications, such as pneumonia (45%) and septicemia (29%), occurred. The main causes of death were septic shock (15.6%) and multiple organ failure (21.9%). There was statistical significance between the recipient's age and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease value at the time of transplantation for the development of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from the present study provide important information about liver transplant. These data may enable the team to propose strategies for practice improvements, which will certainly offer better living conditions and transplant survival.

Barriers to Adherence to Medical Care Programs in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to medical care programs in transplant recipients is considered one of the life-threatening factors in transplant recipients, which can prevent achieving the desired levels of health care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine perceptions of liver transplant recipients about the barriers to their adherence to medical care programs.

METHODS

This study was conducted based on a qualitative content analysis method using semi-structured interviews with 23 liver transplant recipients, their families, and the transplant teams. A purposive sampling method was used in liver transplant clinics affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from May to November 2017.

RESULTS

Three main categories including factors related to therapeutic problems (educational problems and medication challenges), personal factors (self-management disability), as well as social problems (cultural conditions and passive family) were identified as the barriers to adherence to medical care programs.

CONCLUSION

Paying attention to barriers to adherence to medical care and planning for moderating them in a collaborative effort between transplant recipients and health care providers could increase the likelihood of survival and quality of life in these patients.

INFECÇÕES RELACIONADAS À ASSISTÊNCIA À SAÚDE E FATORES ASSOCIADOS NO PÓS-OPERATÓRIO DE TRANSPLANTE HEPÁTICO

RESUMO Objetivo: identificar a incidência das infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde e seus fatores associados, durante o primeiro mês do pós-operatório de pacientes adultos submetidos ao transplante hepático em um hospital público de Fortaleza. Método: estudo retrospectivo, descritivo com abordagem quantitativa, realizado com 53 receptores de fígado no primeiro semestre do ano de 2015. Os dados foram coletados através dos prontuários, fichas ambulatoriais e de notificação de infecções. Resultados: dos pacientes avaliados, 15 (28,3%) apresentaram infecção durante o primeiro mês, em que o mais prevalente foi a sepse clínica (n=6; 37,4%), seguida de infecção do trato respiratório (n=3; 18,8%), trato urinário (n=3;18,8%), sítio cirúrgico (n=3; 18,8%) e por último, infecção de corrente sanguínea (n=1; 6,2%). Os que apresentaram associação estatística em relação a não ocorrência de infecções foram o grupo dos pacientes casados e a indicação de cirrose por hepatite C. A média dos dias de internação no pós-operatório, o uso do imunossupressor micofenolato de mofetil e a média do uso de alguns dispositivos invasivos, foram identificados como os fatores associados à ocorrência de infecções, sendo estatisticamente significativos para p=<0,05. Conclusão: a identificação da incidência das infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde e seus fatores associados em pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático, poderá subsidiar o direcionamento das ações de saúde, com a finalidade de diminuir a morbimortalidade associada às infecções e otimizando a recuperação desses pacientes.

Predictors of Non-adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Asian Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Adherence to immunosuppressive medications has been shown to affect post-transplant outcomes. We aimed to determine the level of adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant (LT) recipients and to elucidate factors associated with it, as well as patient preferences on the dosing schedule.

METHODS

LT recipients were recruited during transplant clinic follow-up. A validated Morisky 8-item questionnaire was completed by patients to assess their adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Adherence was determined by the sum of the responses to the questionnaire. Low, medium, and high adherence were defined by a Morisky score of >2, 1 to 2, and 0, respectively. Data on the patient's socio-economic and clinical background, dosing schedule of immunosuppressant medications, and patient preferences were included in the questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 107 LT recipients were approached and 75 completed the questionnaire. The majority of patients (48/74, 64.9%) preferred a once-daily medication regimen. The proportion of high adherence was 24/75 (32.0%), medium adherence was 51/75 (42.7%), and low adherence was 19/75 (25.3%). Multivariate analysis showed younger age and post-transplant duration >5 years as independent predictors for low adherence. Among low-adherence patients, 16/19 (84.2%) patients were on a twice-daily regimen, and, of these, 14/16 (87.5%) preferred their medications to be reduced to once daily.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion (68%) of LT recipients had low to moderate adherence to medications, with younger age and longer post-transplant duration of >5 years as independent predictors. Early identification of at-risk patients is essential to allow implementation of measures to improve adherence. Simplifying medication regimens to once daily is a potential way to improve adherence.

Factors influencing health self-management in adherence to care and treatment among the recipients of liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation is the global treatment of end-stage liver diseases. Since the patients' survival rate has been improved, the patient may experience reductions in physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functions after liver transplantation influencing their adherence to care and treatment. The transplant survival is complex and patients' adherence to care and treatment should be considered when health care providers make decisions regarding treatment. This qualitative study aimed to explore factors influencing health self-management in adherence to care and treatment among the recipients of care and treatment.

METHODS

In this study, 23 interview sessions were carried out with a total 18 patients, 2 family members and 3 transplantation team members from May to November 2017. The patients were selected using the purposive method from both genders, with a various age range and initial diseases leading to liver transplantation, and time passed from liver transplantation. A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on literature review and pilot interviews. The participants were asked to describe their experiences of self-management behaviors in adherence to treatment and care. The data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis method and managing via the MAXQDA-10 software.

RESULTS

Two themes were developed during data analysis as "self-regulation" and "self-care". "Self-regulation" consisted of "intentionally changing", "positively thinking", "information seeking", "problem-solving", "past knowledge transferring", and "self-controlling". "Self-care" had three sub-themes "shift to independence", "vigilance", and "self-care support".

CONCLUSION

The participants perceived the health self-management in adherence to care as a set of factors related to "self-regulation" and "self-care" behaviors. "Self-regulation" is required to create a balance in life. Also, "self-care" efforts can help with maintaining and improving patients' health.