Catheter-directed thrombolysis for patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis

Real world data on clinical profile, management and outcomes of venous thromboembolism from a tertiary care centre in India

OBJECTIVES

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. This study describes a real-world scenario of VTE presenting to a tertiary care hospital in India.

METHODS

All patients presenting with acute VTE or associated complications from January 2017 to January 2020 were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patient admissions related to VTE were included over 3 years, of which 303 had an acute episode of VTE. The median age was 50 years (IQR 38-64); 30% of patients were younger than 40 years of age. Only 24% of patients had provoked VTE with recent surgery (56%) and malignancy (16%) being the commonest risk factors. VTE manifested as isolated DVT (56%), isolated pulmonary embolism (PE; 19.1%), combined DVT/PE (22.4%), and upper limb DVT (2.3%). Patients with PE (n = 126) were classified as low-risk (15%), intermediate-risk (55%) and high-risk (29%). Reperfusion therapy was performed for 15.7% of patients with intermediate-risk and 75.6% with high-risk PE. In-hospital mortality for the entire cohort was 8.9%; 35% for high-risk PE and 11% for intermediate-risk PE. On multivariate analysis, the presence of active malignancy (OR = 5.8; 95% CI: 1.1-30.8, p = 0.038) and high-risk PE (OR = 4.8; 95% CI: 1.6-14.9, p = 0.006) were found to be independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our data provides real-world perspectives on the demographic sand management of patients presenting with acute VTE in a referral hospital setting. We observed relatively high mortality for intermediate-risk PE, necessitating better subclassification of this group to identify candidates for more aggressive approaches.

Inferior vena cava filters utilization in patients with venous thromboembolism: Analysis of a database of a tertiary hospital

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) utilization in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in tertiary care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of database of a tertiary hospital in 2016-2017. All the records of patients admitted for VTE or diagnosed with VTE being hospitalized for other reasons were extracted. The data collected were number of patients, who received IVCF, indications to filter insertion, PE and death rate after procedure, frequency of IVCF occlusion.

RESULTS

2399 patients with VTE were admitted to hospital. 442 (18,4%) of them received IVCF (239 in 2016 and 203 in 2017). Retrievable models were used in most cases (98,8%). In 119 (5,0%) patients cava filters were used due to contraindications for anticoagulation, while in 184 (7,7%) patients' anticoagulation was not effective and thrombosis progression was registered. 101 (4,2%) patients received IVCF due to high PE risk (length of floating thrombus ≥7 cm, in proximal location), high pulmonary hypertension was indication to IVCF insertion in 38 (1,6%) patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in combination with pulmonary embolism (PE). Overall mortality rate after IVCF insertion was 5 (0,2%). No fatal PE was registered. IVCF occlusion during hospitalization occurred in 116 (4,8%) cases. Only 29 (1,2%) of patients were admitted back for IVCF removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Every one in five patients with proximal DVT and/or PE receives IVCF in a routine practice in tertiary hospital. The most common indications for IVCF implantation were inability for anticoagulation or anticoagulation failure. Removal rate of retrievable cava filters is low.

American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs in ∼1 to 2 individuals per 1000 each year, corresponding to ∼300 000 to 600 000 events in the United States annually.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about treatment of VTE.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and adult patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 28 recommendations for the initial management of VTE, primary treatment, secondary prevention, and treatment of recurrent VTE events.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations include the use of thrombolytic therapy for patients with PE and hemodynamic compromise, use of an international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0 over a lower INR range for patients with VTE who use a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for secondary prevention, and use of indefinite anticoagulation for patients with recurrent unprovoked VTE. Conditional recommendations include the preference for home treatment over hospital-based treatment for uncomplicated DVT and PE at low risk for complications and a preference for direct oral anticoagulants over VKA for primary treatment of VTE.

May-Thurner Syndrome: A Consideration for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Males

May–Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an underdiagnosed cause of lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The clinical prevalence of MTS-related DVT is likely underestimated, particularly in patients with other more recognisable risk factors. MTS is classically described in females between the age group of 20–50 years. In patients with acute iliofemoral thrombosis, medical treatment with anticoagulation alone has been associated with higher risk of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and lower iliofemoral patency rates, as compared to endovascular correction. We describe a case of MTS-related extensive iliofemoral DVT occurring in a middle age male who presented with acute onset of left lower limb swelling and pain, complicated by pulmonary embolism. Doppler compression ultrasonography of the left lower limb showed partial DVT extending from the left external iliac to the popliteal veins, and contrasted computed tomography (CT) of the thorax abdomen and pelvis established features of MTS, together with right pulmonary embolism. He was started on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and then underwent left lower limb AngioJet pharmacomechanical thrombolysis/thrombectomy, iliac vein stenting, and temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion. After the procedure, the patient recovered and improved symptomatically with rapid resolution of this left lower limb swelling and pain. He was switched to an oral Factor Xa inhibitor and was subsequently discharged. After 1-month follow-up, he remained well with stent patency visualised on repeat ultrasound and underwent an uneventful elective IVC filter retrieval with subsequent plans for a 1-year follow-up.

Outcome of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis Using Standard Treatment versus Thrombolytics: A Literature Review

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major health problem affectinga significant portion of population. Primary complications are Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in the short term and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) in the long term. Thrombolytic drugs act by activating plasminogen which in turn forms the enzyme plasmin. Plasmin consequently degrades blood clots by breaking down the fibrin molecules which make up the clots help to degrade the already formed clot. They can be used using different route of administration, doses and durations. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the outcome of thrombolytic therapy in terms of the efficacy, safety and effectiveness of the medicines. Electronic searches of databases (MEDLINE and Google Scholar) were queried for articles written in English since 2000 GC. A total of 760 results were obtained using the search keys, and after excluding duplicates, 275 articles were selected. Finally, 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which met the language of publication, study design and exclusion criteria were included in this systematic review. The data were obtained from nine trials (6 countries), providing a study-level data of 1309 participants. Almost all studies revealed that thrombolytic treatment was effective in the management of acute DVT. In most of the studies, the rate of rethrombosis was lower in case of thrombolytic than standard management. Hence, addition of thrombolytic results in persistence and increases the clinical benefits. Thrombolytic therapy was very effective in reversing closed veins, in boosting the patency rate,whilereflux was higher in patients treated with anticoagulants. Thrombolytic offers potential advantages over the standard treatment of DVT by reducing the proportion of patients with chronic disabling leg symptoms (such as PTS) by triple in the longer term. However, the incident of major bleeding was higher in patients receiving thrombolytics than anticoagulants.

The cumulative venous thromboembolism incidence and risk factors in intensive care patients receiving the guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis

Few prospective studies have reported the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the intensive care unit (ICU), especially for patients receiving guideline-recommended VTE prophylaxis. We aimed to design a prospective observational study to investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors of ICU-acquired VTE for those populations.We prospectively studied 281 consecutively included patients in the ICU at a single center. All patients provided informed consent. Patients received ultrasound evaluation and were followed for VTE before ICU discharge or within 28 days of ICU stay. The type of VTE thromboprophylaxis was also recorded for all patients. Variables from univariate analyses that were associated with VTE were included in the binary logistic regression analysis to determine VTE predictors. The cumulative VTE incidence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.Patients had a median age of 60 years (range, 18-89) and an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of 17 (range, 4-36). Despite all patients receiving guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis, the cumulative incidence of VTE at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days was 4.45% (95% CI 2.55-7.71), 7.14% (95% CI 4.61-10.97), 7.53% (95% CI 4.92-11.43), and 9.55% (95% CI 6.55-13.81), respectively. Central venous catheter use (P = .002, odds ratio [OR] = 4.50), Caprini score (P = .012, OR = 1.20), and ICU length of stay (P = .006, OR = 1.08) were independent risk factors related to the incidence of VTE for patients admitted to the ICU.Our prospective observational study found that the 28-day cumulative incidence of VTE was relatively high for patients admitted to the ICU, despite the use of guideline-recommended thromboprophylaxis. Patients with femoral central venous catheter, prolonged ICU length of stay, or a high Caprini score may have an increased risk of developing VTE.

Iliac vein compression: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment

Iliac vein compression (LIVC) is a prevalent finding in the general population, but a smaller number of patients are symptomatic. ILVC should be considered in symptomatic patients with unexplained unilateral lower leg swelling. Patients typically complain of one or more of the following symptoms: lower leg pain, heaviness, venous claudication, swelling, hyperpigmentation and ulceration. ILVC can be thrombotic, combined with acute or chronic DVT, or non-thrombotic. ILVC is best diagnosed with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), but computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have emerged as valid screening tests. Venography underestimates the severity of ILVC but may provide insights into the anatomy and the presence of collaterals. Based on current available evidence, endovascular therapy with stenting remains the main treatment strategy for ILVC. Dedicated nitinol venous stents are currently under review by the Food and Drug Administration for potential approval in the United States. These stents have been released outside the US. There is no consensus to the optimal anticoagulation regimen post-ILVC stenting. Oral anticoagulants, however, remain a preferred therapy in patients with history of thrombotic ILVC.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/InSwn2AebNY