Fontan operation and the cavopulmonary technique: immediate and late results according to the presence of atrial fenestration

Echocardiographic Screening for Postoperative Pericardial Effusion in Children

Pericardial effusion (PE) after cardiac surgery can be life threatening without timely detection, and the optimal screening method is unknown. We sought to evaluate the role of a surveillance echocardiogram on postoperative day 10 (± 2), determine the incidence of postoperative PE, and identify risk factors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all pediatric patients who underwent open heart surgery at a single institution over a 7-month period. To identify risk factors for PE, medical records of patients with PE detected within 6 weeks after surgery (cases) were compared with patients without PE (controls). Of 203 patients, 52 (26%) had PE within 6 weeks; 42 (81%) were trivial-small and 10 (19%) were moderate-large. Twenty-nine (56%) were first detected within 7 days post-operatively, including all cases developing cardiac tamponade (n = 3). An echocardiogram was done 10 (± 2) days post-operatively in 41/52 cases, of which 12/41 (29%) did not have a PE at this time, 24/41 (59%) had a trivial-small PE, and 5/41(12%) had a moderate-large PE; 2 of the latter had no prior detected PE. Closure of an atrial septal defect had the highest incidence of PE (42%). PE cases were associated with postoperative nasopharyngeal detection of a respiratory virus (OR 3.8, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the majority of PE cases were detected within 7 days post-operatively, including all cases subsequently developing cardiac tamponade. Day 10 echocardiography infrequently detected a moderate or large effusion that had previously gone undiagnosed. A positive perioperative nasopharyngeal aspirate for a respiratory virus was associated with postoperative PE.

Comparison of the fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan procedures: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits of fenestration for patients undergoing Fontan procedure seem controversial at early and late postoperative stages.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the outcomes between the fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan procedures.

METHODS

Studies comparing the fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan procedures were identified by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until July 2018. The assessed variables included postoperative oxygen saturation (SaO2), pulmonary artery pressure, mortality, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, ventilation time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, chest tube duration, protein-losing enteropathy, arrhythmia, and other follow-up outcomes including reintervention, stroke/thrombosis, and peak oxygen consumption. A random-effect/fixed-effect model was used to summarize the estimates of the mean difference (MD)/odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis stratified by early and late outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1929 Fontan patients from 14 studies were included. The early postoperative SaO2 was lower with fenestration than without fenestration (MD -2.52, 95% CI -4.16 to -0.87, P <.05); however, the late postoperative SaO2 showed no difference between the 2 approaches. The CPB time was shorter without fenestration than with fenestration (MD 10.72, 95% CI 2.54-18.9, P <.05); however, the incidence of arrhythmia was lower with fenestration than without fenestration (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.75, P <.05). Other variables showed no significant differences between the 2 approaches in Fontan patients.

CONCLUSION

Fenestration appears to result in a lower incidence of arrhythmia but with a longer CPB time and lower early SaO2. Other outcomes are comparable between the 2 approaches.

Life After Surviving Fontan Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of the Incidence and Predictors of Late Death

AIM

We now know that 20-40% of patients with a single ventricle will develop heart failure after the second decade post-Fontan surgery. However, we remain unable to risk-stratify the cohort to identify patients at highest risk of late failure and death. We conducted a systematic review of all reported late outcomes for patients with a Fontan circulation to identify predictors of late death.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed with subject terms ("single ventricle", "Hypoplastic left heart syndrome", "congenital heart defects" or "Fontan procedure") AND ("heart failure", "post-operative complications", "death", "cause of death", "transplantation" or "follow-up studies") for relevant studies between January 1990 and December 2015. Variables identified as significant predictors of late death on multivariate analysis were collated for meta-analysis. Survival data was extrapolated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves to generate a distribution-free summary survival curve.

RESULTS

Thirty-four relevant publications were identified, with a total of 7536 patients included in the analysis. Mean follow-up duration was 114 months (range 24-269 months). There were 688 (11%) late deaths. Predominant causes of death were late Fontan failure (34%), sudden death (19%) and perioperative death (16%). Estimated mean survival at 5, 10 and 20 years post Fontan surgery were 95% (95%CI 93-96), 91% (95%CI 89-93) and 82% (95%CI 77-85). Significant predictors of late death include prolonged pleural effusions post Fontan surgery (HR1.18, 95%CI 1.09-1.29, p<0.001), protein losing enteropathy (HR2.19, 95%CI 1.69-2.84, p<0.001), increased ventricular end diastolic volume (HR1.03 per 10ml/BSA increase, 95%CI 1.02-1.05, p<0.001) and having a permanent pacemaker (HR12.63, 95%CI 6.17-25.86, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 80% of patients who survive Fontan surgery will be alive at 20 years. Developing late sequelae including protein losing enteropathy, ventricular dysfunction or requiring a pacemaker predict a higher risk of late death.

Decision-Making for Surgery in the Management of Patients with Univentricular Heart

A series of technical refinements over the past 30 years, in combination with advances in perioperative management, have resulted in dramatic improvements in the survival of patients with univentricular heart. While the goal of single-ventricle palliation remains unchanged - normalization of the pressure and volume loads on the systemic ventricle, the strategies to achieve that goal have become more diverse. Optimal palliation relies on a thorough understanding of the changing physiology over the first years of life and the risks and consequences of each palliative strategy. This review describes how to optimize surgical decision-making in univentricular patients based on a current understanding of anatomy, physiology, and surgical palliation.

Post-operative chylothorax in children: an evidence-based management algorithm

AIM

To develop an evidence-based algorithm for the therapeutic approach to the management of post-operative chylothorax.

METHODS

Review and analysis of published literature sourced from Medline from 1964-2007.

RESULTS

Understanding the pathophysiology of chylothorax and the anatomical structure of the thoracic duct assisted clinical decision making in the management of a patient with chylothorax. Treatment options for post-operative chlothorax include conservative management with medium chain triglyceride-enriched diet or total parenteral nutrition in combination with adequate drainage of pleural fluid, somatostatin or octreotide therapy or surgical intervention. Based on analysis of the available evidence an algorithm for therapeutic approach to the management of post-operative chylothorax has been developed.

CONCLUSION

Post-operative chylothorax is associated with significant morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. An evidence based algorithm to guide the therapeutic approach to management of post-operative chylolthorax is proposed.

What was the impact of the introduction of extracardiac completion for a single center performing total cavopulmonary connections?

BACKGROUND

Creation of an extracardiac cavopulmonary connection has been proposed as a superior alternative to the lateral intracardiac tunnel for the completion of total cavopulmonary connection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We made a retrospective review of our experience with 125 patients undergoing a total cavopulmonary connection between June 1994 and January 2003. Our experience with the extracardiac connection for completion began in 1999. Since 1994, we have constructed an intracardiac tunnel in 50 patients, and an extracardiac connection in 75. Of the total number, 83 had undergone an earlier partial cavopulmonary connection. Additional intracardiac procedures were performed in 43 patients at time of completion, in 25 of those undergoing extracardiac completion, and in 18 of the patients having an intracardiac procedure. The mean size of the tube used for completion was 19 mm. The mean cross-clamp time for placement of the intracardiac tunnel was 77 min, with a median of 80.5 min, and a mean cardiopulmonary bypass time of 139 min, with a median of 131 min. For construction of the extracardiac connection, a mean cross-clamp time in 24 of the 75 patients was 54 min, with a median of 54 min. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time for all the patients with an extracardiac connection was 100 min, with a median of 88 min. Reoperations were needed in 10 patients, 6 having intracardiac and 4 extracardiac procedures. Of these, 5 were early and 5 late, including one take down. None of the patients died after these interventions. Taken overall, 8 patients died, with 5 early deaths. In the multivariable analysis, cardiopulmonary bypass time of more than 120 min, atrioventricular valvar replacement, and banding of the pulmonary trunk prior to the total cavopulmonary connection, all reached statistical significance for early death, whereas only heterotaxy syndrome remained as the sole risk factor for late death. There was no significant difference in survival between the modifications used.

DISCUSSION

Whereas we could not identify any clinical superiority for the extracardiac approach in the short-term, the concept of extracardiac completion has helped to simplify the overall procedure. Longer follow-up will be required to elucidate any potential advantages.