Clinical implications of drug interactions with coxibs

Investigation of Drug-Interaction Potential for Arthritis Dietary Supplements: Chondroitin Sulfate, Glucosamine, and Methylsulfonylmethane

Osteoarthritis is one of the leading conditions that promote the consumption of these dietary supplements. Chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine, and methylsulfonylmethane are among the prominent alternative treatments for osteoarthritis. In this study, these dietary supplements were incubated with cytochrome P450 isozyme-specific substrates in human liver microsomes, and the formation of marker metabolites was measured to investigate their inhibitory potential on cytochrome P450 enzyme activities. The results revealed no significant inhibitory effects on seven CYPs, consistent with established related research data. Therefore, these substances are anticipated to have a low potential for cytochrome P450-mediated drug interactions with osteoarthritis medications that are likely to be co-administered. However, given the previous reports of interaction cases involving glucosamine, caution is advised regarding dietary supplement-drug interactions.

Efficacy of duloxetine compared with opioid for postoperative pain control following total knee arthroplasty

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of duloxetine as an alternative to opioid treatment for postoperative pain management following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Among 944 patients, 290 (30.7%) of patients received opioid or duloxetine for pain control for 6 weeks when the pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was greater than 4 out of 10 at the time of discharge. 121 patients in the Opioid group and 118 in the Duloxetine group were followed up for more than one year. Preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcome measures (pain VAS score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) score were compared. The rate of further drug prescription (opioid or duloxetine) after 6 weeks of first prescription, 30-day readmission rate, and side effects were also investigated.

Results

There was no significant difference in pain VAS score, WOMAC Pain and Function score, at each time point between before and after surgery (all p>0.05). Fifteen (9.8%) patients in the opioid group and six (4.4%) patients in the duloxetine group were prescribed additional medication after first 6 weeks, showing no significant (p>0.05) difference in proportion. The 30-day readmission rate and the incidence of side effects were also similar (all p>0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects between the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Duloxetine and opioid did not show any difference in pain control, function, and side effects for up to one year after TKA. Although large-scale randomized controlled trials are still required to further confirm the side effects of duloxetine, it can be considered as an alternative to opioid for postoperative pain control following TKA.

Concomitant drugs with low risks of drug-drug interactions for use in oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur with investigational drugs and affect patient safety, trial outcomes, and drug development. A list of preferred drugs with minimal risks of DDIs for treatment of symptoms or comorbidities frequently encountered by cancer patients would be helpful.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature to assess DDIs reported for the main drugs available for treatment of symptoms/comorbidities frequently encountered by cancer patients. Reviews and relevant original articles cited were retrieved and analyzed, and the following data were collected and double-checked: pharmacological properties; effects, if any, of drugs on CYP enzymes, membrane transporters, and QT interval; and involvement in significant DDIs.

RESULTS

A list of preferred drugs with minimal risks of DDIs was compiled.

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging for heterogeneity in data sources, prevention of unexpected DDIs during clinical trials may be improved by using this list of preferred drugs for the management of study patient's symptoms.

Fetal serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant exposure: maternal and fetal factors

Prenatal serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure is common and neonatal outcomes vary greatly, often leading to confusion about whether to use or even continue antenatal use of these antidepressants. Importantly, some but not all infants are affected, which raises questions about how maternal drug metabolism contributes to fetal drug exposure. To address this key question, our paper reviews the role of key maternal, fetal, and placental pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and genetic factors that affect the extent of fetal drug exposure. Considering the role of these factors may further our understanding of variables that may assist in optimizing maternal psychopharmacotherapy during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

An overview of clinical pharmacology of Ibuprofen

Ibuprofen was the first member of Propionic acid derivatives introduced in 1969. It is a popular domestic and over the counter analgesic and antipyretic for adults and children. Ibuprofen has been rated as the safest conventional NSAID by spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting systems in the UK. This article summarizes the main pharmacological effects, therapeutical applications and adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions and food drug interactions of ibuprofen that have been reported especially during the last 10 years.

Pharmacogenetics of analgesics: toward the individualization of prescription

The use of analgesics is based on the empiric administration of a given drug with clinical monitoring for efficacy and toxicity. However, individual responses to drugs are influenced by a combination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors that can sometimes be regulated by genetic factors. Whereas polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, polymorphic drug targets and disease-related pathways may influence the pharmacodynamic action of drugs. After a usual dose, variations in drug toxicity and inefficacy can be observed depending on the polymorphism, the analgesic considered and the presence or absence of active metabolites. For opioids, the most studied being morphine, mutations in the ABCB1 gene, coding for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and in the µ-opioid receptor reduce morphine potency. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 mutations influence the analgesic effect of codeine and tramadol, and polymorphism of CYP2C9 is potentially linked to an increase in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced adverse events. Furthermore, drug interactions can mimic genetic deficiency and contribute to the variability in response to analgesics. This review summarizes the available data on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of known polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, drug targets and other nonopioid biological systems on central and peripheral analgesics.

Prevention of lipopolysaccharide-induced intussusception in mice by the COX2 inhibitor rofecoxib

Intussusception (IS), an invagination of a portion of the intestine into itself, has recently attracted considerable interest after the withdrawal of a rotavirus vaccine because of reports on increased risk of IS shortly after vaccination. The present study was designed to shed further light on the mechanism of IS formation and its prevention. Intussusception was induced in adult mice by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 8 mg/kg) from salmonella typhimurium. The presence of IS was confirmed at laparotomy. The serum levels TNF-alpha were measured with ELISA. Six hours after LPS injection, 14.5% of the animals demonstrated IS. A total of 65 animals received rofecoxib (20 mg/kg), a selective COX2 inhibitor, 15-30 min before intraperitoneal injection of LPS, and only two (3%) in this group demonstrated IS 6 h later (P < 0.05 vs. control). We confirmed the well-known increase in serum TNF-alpha levels in response to LPS; however, this increase was not blocked by rofecoxib pretreatment. Notably, there was no correlation between the serum TNF-alpha levels and the development of IS. The results show that the occurrence of IS can be significantly decreased by pretreatment with a selective COX-2 inhibitor.

A study of the pharmacokinetic interactions of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren with allopurinol, celecoxib and cimetidine in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

Aliskiren is the first in a new class of orally effective direct renin inhibitors approved for the treatment of hypertension. This multiple-dose study investigated the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between aliskiren and three drugs, each predominantly eliminated by a different clearance/metabolic pathway: allopurinol (glomerular filtration), celecoxib (cytochrome P450 metabolism) and cimetidine (P-glycoprotein and organic anion/cation transporters).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Three open-label, multiple-dose studies in healthy subjects investigated possible pharmacokinetic interactions between aliskiren 300 mg od and allopurinol 300 mg od (n = 20), celecoxib 200 mg bid (n = 22), or cimetidine 800 mg od (n = 22). Subjects received aliskiren alone or co-administered with allopurinol, celecoxib or cimetidine. Allopurinol and celecoxib were also administered alone and in combination with aliskiren. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS.

RESULTS

Co-administration of aliskiren with allopurinol had no effect on allopurinol AUC(tau) (ratio of geometric means 0.93 [90% CI, 0.88, 0.98]) or oxypurinol AUC(tau) (mean ratio 1.12 [90% CI, 1.08, 1.16]) and C(max) (mean ratio 1.08 [90% CI, 1.04, 1.13]), with 90% CI within the bioequivalence range 0.80-1.25, and a minor effect on allopurinol C(max) (mean ratio 0.88 [90% CI, 0.78, 1.00]). Aliskiren co-administration had no effect on AUC(tau) or C(max) of celecoxib (mean ratios and 90% CI within range 0.80-1.25). Neither allopurinol nor celecoxib significantly altered aliskiren AUC(tau) or C(max) (geometric mean ratios 0.88-1.02 with 90% CI including 1.00, but with some 90% CI outside the 0.80-1.25 range due to high variability). Co-administration of aliskiren with cimetidine increased aliskiren AUC(tau) by 20% (mean ratio 1.20 [90% CI, 1.07, 1.34]) and C(max) by 25% (mean ratio 1.25 [90% CI, 0.98, 1.59]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multiple-dose study, aliskiren showed no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions when co-administered with allopurinol, celecoxib or cimetidine in healthy subjects.

Action of Celecoxib on Hepatic Metabolic Changes Induced by the Walker-256 Tumour in Rats

The purpose of the present work was to investigate the influence of celecoxib on some hepatic metabolic parameters affected by the Walker-256 tumour in rats. Celecoxib was administered daily (5-50 mg/kg body weight) beginning at the day in which the tumour cells were inocculated. At day 14, the liver was isolated and perfused in order to measure alanine transformation, glycolysis and arginine transformation. Maximal reduction of tumour growth (75%), accompanied by an almost normal weight gain, was attained with a celecoxib dose of 12.5 mg/kg. Diminution of glucose utilization (glycolysis) and inhibition of gluconeogenesis and ureogenesis from alanine caused by the tumor were totally reversed by celecoxib. Oxygen uptake by the liver was also normalized by the drug. Hepatic arginine transformation, which is normally enhanced in rats bearing the Walker-256 tumour, remained elevated in celecoxib-treated animals. It was concluded that preservation of gluconeogenesis and normalization of hepatic glucose utilization can explain, partly at least, the clinical improvement of cancer patients treated with the drug. The lack of action of celecoxib on arginine hydrolysis might indicate that reduction in polyamine synthesis is not a factor contributing to the diminished tumour growth.

Dose-dependent reduction of 3,2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl-derived DNA adducts in colon and liver of rats administered celecoxib

Colon cancer is second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Western countries. Diet and smoking, which contain aromatic and heterocyclic amines, are major risk factors for colon cancer. Colorectal cancers have a natural history of long latency and therefore provide ample opportunities for effective chemoprevention. 3,2'-Dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl (DMABP) is an experimental aromatic amine that causes cancer in rat colon and serves as an experimental model for arylamine and heterocyclic amine mutagens derived from diet and smoking. In this study, we investigated the effects of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor on DMABP-induced DNA adduct formation in rat liver and colon. Male F-344 rats (5-week old) were provided free access to modified AIN-76A rat chow containing 0 (control), 500, 1000, or 1500 ppm celecoxib. Two weeks later, the rats received a subcutaneous injection of 100mg/kg DMABP in peanut oil. Two days after DMABP treatment, the rats were killed and DMABP-derived adducts were analyzed in colon and liver DNA by butanol extraction-mediated (32)P-postlabeling. Two major DNA adducts, identified as dG-C8-DMABP and dG-N(2)-DMABP, were detected in liver and colon of rats treated with DMABP. These DNA adducts were diminished approximately 35-40% with 500 ppm and 65-70% with 1,000 ppm celecoxib. In the colon, no further decline in DNA adducts was observed at 1500 ppm. The same DMABP-DNA adducts also were detected in the liver and were also diminished by celecoxib treatment. The reduction in DMABP-DNA adduct levels in celecoxib-treated animals provides further support for celecoxib as a chemopreventive agent for colorectal cancer.

Quantitative HPLC-UV method for the determination of firocoxib from horse and dog plasma

A sensitive reversed-phase HPLC-UV method was developed for the determination of firocoxib, a novel and highly selective COX-2 inhibitor, in plasma. A 1.0 mL dog or horse plasma sample is mixed with water and passed through a hydrophobic-lipophilic copolymer solid-phase extraction column to isolate firocoxib. Quantitation is based on an external standard curve. The method has a validated limit of quantitation of 25 ng/mL and a limit of detection of 10 ng/mL. The validated upper limit of quantitation was 2500 ng/mL for horses and 10,000 ng/mL for dogs. The average recoveries ranged from 88-93% for horse plasma and 96-103% for dog plasma. The coefficient of variation in all cases was less than 10%. This method is suitable for the analysis of clinical samples from pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies and drug monitoring.

Subacute toxicity of celecoxib on thyroid and testis of rats: Hormonal and histopathological changes

Celecoxib is an effective agent in the treatment of signs and symptoms of inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of two different doses of celecoxib on some hormones and endocrine glands of male rats. In this study, the doses of 10 and 50mg/kg/day of celecoxib were given to male rats orally for 28 days. At the end of the study, serum total triiodothyronine (T(3)), total thyroxine (T(4)), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels of rats were analyzed by radioimmunoassay technique using RIA kits. Thyroid and testis tissues of male rats were examined histopathologically. While there was no a change in serum T(3), T(4) and LH levels of celecoxib-treated rats, there were differences in serum TSH and testosterone levels of rats treated with 50mg/kg/day celecoxib for 28 days compared with those of control rats. In histopathological examinations, celecoxib-related changes were found in thyroid glands of the rats.

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors: when should they be used in the elderly?

Chronic pain in the elderly is frequently a result of arthritic disorders, particularly osteoarthritis. The cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are as effective as standard NSAIDs for the relief of pain and for improving function in elderly patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. COX-2 inhibitors increase the risk of serious gastroduodenal adverse reactions but there is evidence that they carry a lower risk for these adverse effects than standard NSAIDs, except when there is concurrent aspirin use. Since gastroduodenal disorders are the most frequently reported serious adverse effects of NSAIDs and these disorders occur more frequently in the elderly, COX-2 inhibitors offer an alternative to standard NSAIDs in this age group. However, they are not appropriate for many patients with cardiovascular and renal disease. The adverse reaction profile of the COX-2 inhibitors has confirmed the role of the COX-2 enzyme in renal function, salt and water homeostasis and the vascular endothelium. Thus, like standard NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors can cause renal failure, hypertension and exacerbation of cardiac failure. Of note is that these disorders are dose related. Thus, there are good reasons to avoid high doses of COX-2 inhibitors in the elderly. Clinical trials indicate that daily doses of rofecoxib 12.5 mg, celecoxib 100-200 mg, valdecoxib 10mg and etoricoxib 60 mg are the minimum effective doses of these agents. Data from the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme indicate that celecoxib 200 mg/day and rofecoxib 25 mg/day are/were the most commonly prescribed doses and that 6% of patients had taken rofecoxib 50 mg/day for longer than recommended. Recent research indicates that COX-2 inhibitors have a thrombotic potential, especially in high doses and when use is prolonged, and this further limits the extent to which they can be used in the elderly. Important interactions with COX-2 inhibitors in the elderly include those with warfarin, which can result in loss of control of anticoagulation, and those with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists and diuretics, which can result in loss of control of blood pressure and cardiac failure and, in hypovolaemic conditions, renal failure. The clinical significance of an interaction between celecoxib and aspirin to reduce the antiplatelet effect of the latter drug is unknown. Preliminary information from spontaneous reporting systems indicates that there may be differences in the risk of cardiac failure and hypertension between standard NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors and between rofecoxib and celecoxib. More formal studies using equivalent doses are needed to test this observation. Use of COX-2 inhibitors may be considered in the elderly to reduce the risk of gastroduodenal complications associated with standard NSAIDs but only when consideration has first been given to use of less toxic medicines as alternatives or supplements, the appropriate dose of the COX-2 inhibitor or standard NSAID, the presence and possible impact of co-morbidities, and the implications of taking COX-2 inhibitors with any concomitant medications. Equally important is regular monitoring of the patient taking a COX-2 inhibitor for efficacy and adverse effects, and ensuring that the patient has a continuing need to keep taking the drug. Close attention also needs to be paid to intercurrent illnesses and new prescriptions that may reduce the safety of the COX-2 inhibitor. A standard NSAID plus a proton pump inhibitor may be equally effective as a COX-2 inhibitor in reducing the risk of gastroduodenal toxicity and if used the same prescribing advice applies. Current knowledge concerning the thrombotic potential of COX-2 inhibitors suggests that this combination, if tolerated, may be preferable to a COX-2 inhibitor, particularly where prolonged use is required. This knowledge also indicates that for patients with or at high risk of ischaemic heart disease or stroke, COX-2 inhibitors are contraindicated.

Selective COX-2 inhibitors and risk of myocardial infarction

Selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2, 'coxibs') are highly effective anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs that exert their action by preventing the formation of prostanoids. Recently some coxibs, which were designed to exploit the advantageous effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs while evading their side effects, have been reported to increase the risk of myo cardial infarction and atherothrombotic events. This has led to the withdrawal of rofecoxib from global markets, and warnings have been issued by drug authorities about similar events during the use of celecoxib or valdecoxib/parecoxib, bringing about questions of an inherent atherothrombotic risk of all coxibs and consequences that should be drawn by health care professionals. These questions need to be addressed in light of the known effects of selective inhibition of COX-2 on the cardiovascular system. Although COX-2, in contrast to the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) isoform, is regarded as an inducible enzyme that only has a role in pathophysiological processes like pain and inflammation, experimental and clinical studies have shown that COX-2 is constitutively expressed in tissues like the kidney or vascular endothelium, where it executes important physiological functions. COX-2-dependent formation of prostanoids not only results in the mediation of pain or inflammatory signals but also in the maintenance of vascular integrity. Especially prostacyclin (PGI(2)), which exerts vasodilatory and antiplatelet properties, is formed to a significant extent by COX-2, and its levels are reduced to less than half of normal when COX-2 is inhibited. This review outlines the rationale for the development of selective COX-2 inhibitors and the pathophysiological consequences of selective inhibition of COX-2 with special regard to vasoactive prostaglandins. It describes coxibs that are current ly available, evaluates the current knowledge on the risk of atherothrombotic events associated with their intake and critically discusses the consequences that should be drawn from these insights.

Lumiracoxib: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile when coadministered with fluconazole in healthy subjects

This two-way crossover study evaluated the effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and selective COX-2 inhibition of lumiracoxib. Thirteen healthy subjects were randomized to fluconazole (day 1: 400 mg; days 2-4: 200 mg) or no drug. On day 4, all subjects received a single dose of lumiracoxib (400 mg). Lumiracoxib pharmacokinetics were assessed during the following 48 hours. Thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) inhibition was measured prior to lumiracoxib dosing and 2 hours afterwards. Fluconazole caused a small (18%) but not clinically relevant increase in lumiracoxib mean AUC(0- infinity ) but had no effect on lumiracoxib mean C(max). The geometric mean ratio (lumiracoxib plus fluconazole/lumiracoxib alone) for AUC(0- infinity ) was 1.19 (90% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12, 1.27) and for C(max) was 1.11 (90% CI = 0.98, 1.27). The decrease in TxB(2) from predose was not significantly different for lumiracoxib (11.8%) or lumiracoxib plus fluconazole (7.1%); no correlation between lumiracoxib concentration and TxB(2) decrease was seen. As fluconazole is a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, other CYP2C9 inhibitors are unlikely to affect lumiracoxib pharmacokinetics with clinical relevance, making dosage adjustment unnecessary.

COX-2 selective inhibitors: a literature review of analgesic efficacy and safety in oral-maxillofacial surgery

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly prescribed analgesic agents in surgical outpatients. Major limitations of NSAIDs are their gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (perforation, ulceration, and bleeding), impairment of hemostatic function, and renal failure (with long-term therapy). A new class of NSAIDs, the COX-2 selective inhibitors (CSIs or Coxibs), have been developed with the aim of reducing the GI adverse events of traditional NSAIDs while maintaining their effective anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties.

OBJECTIVE

This is a narrative review of the literature aimed to discuss analgesic efficacy, clinical safety and cost-benefit ratio of CSIs in the treatment of post-oral surgery pain.

METHODS

Relevant drug and clinical studies of analgesic efficacy and safety of CSIs in the management of postoperative dental pain were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, in peer-reviewed journals of medicine and dentistry. The Food and Drug Administration Web site was searched for data of tolerability. Hand-searching included several dental journals and bibliographies of relevant studies. The last electronic search was conducted in April 2003.

RESULTS

Data from well-designed, randomized, controlled trials of CSIs on the management of post-oral surgery pain indicate that these drugs are as well-effective analgesic agents as traditional NSAIDs and offer clinical advantages in terms of GI safety and unimpaired platelet function. CSIs do not offer advantages of renal safety over traditional NSAIDs.

CONCLUSION

Although CSIs display analgesic efficacy similar to that of traditional NSAIDs in the treatment of acute, post-oral surgery pain, there is reasonable evidence that these new drugs are preferable in patients who are at an increased risk of developing serious upper-GI complications, in patients who take aspirin for cardiovascular comorbid conditions, and in those allergic to aspirin. Furthermore, CSIs may be given more safely than NSAIDs in perioperative settings, because of their lack of impairment of the blood-clotting. However, the high costs of CSIs available at present limit their routine use in the short period of postoperative dental pain-in most cases 2 to 4 days after surgery-because there is not an increased risk of developing serious GI complications with the use of cost-saving NSAIDs. The GI safety advantages of CSIs may improve the tolerability of long-duration analgesic therapies, such as cases of painful temporomandibular joint disorders and chronic orofacial pain. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-benefit ratio of using CSIs for the management of acute pain.

Comparison of Changes in Blood Pressure Measurements and Antihypertensive Therapy in Older, Hypertensive, Ambulatory Care Patients Prescribed Celecoxib or Rofecoxib

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if changes in blood pressure and changes in class or dosing of antihypertensive drugs were significantly different in patients treated with celecoxib versus rofecoxib, two cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Thirty-one ambulatory care practices that shared an electronic medical record.

PATIENTS

Nine hundred sixty men and women over age 55 years with stable hypertension.

INTERVENTION

Patients had to have at least a 30-day supply of celecoxib or rofecoxib (any dose) prescribed between July 1, 1999, and June 30, 2000.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were followed for 6 months, and logistic regression and survival models were used to compare outcomes between groups while adjusting for confounders. Baseline characteristics of 517 patients receiving celecoxib and 443 receiving rofecoxib were similar. No significant differences were observed, regardless of the COX-2 inhibitor prescribed, in the proportion of patients whose systolic blood pressure increased by 20 mm Hg, whose diastolic blood pressure increased by 15 mm Hg, or who were prescribed a new class of antihypertensive drug. Compared with patients taking celecoxib, those taking rofecoxib were significantly more likely (odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.60) to have had the dosage of their antihypertensive drug increased and also the dosage increased sooner (p<0.05). New-onset cardiac and renal comorbidity, number of physician visits, and changes in body weight and laboratory values were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in blood pressure changes or in the proportion of patients who were prescribed a new class of antihypertensive drug were found between rofecoxib- and celecoxib-treated patients. However, significantly more rofecoxib-treated patients had the dosage of their existing antihypertensive drug increased compared with those receiving celecoxib.

Adverse Drug Events Involving COX-2 Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To describe the types and severity of adverse drug-related events (ADEs) observed in patients receiving cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and to increase the awareness of risk factors that predispose patients to ADEs associated with COX-2 inhibitors.

METHODS

A review of ADEs reported at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital (UPMC-P) revealed significant events related to use of celecoxib or rofecoxib. A query of the internal ADE database was performed to identify ADEs involving COX-2 inhibitors from January 1999 to June 2002. A similar query was performed to identify ADEs involving nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reported during this same time period. Utilization data were also collected.

RESULTS

Forty-eight ADEs involving 24 patients receiving COX-2 inhibitors were reported and validated via the UPMC-P ADE review process compared with 38 events in 33 patients receiving nonselective NSAIDs. The types of ADEs reported as related to COX-2 inhibitors were similar to those reported in association with nonselective NSAIDs. Forty-two percent of ADEs (n = 20) involving COX-2 inhibitors and 45% of events (n = 17) involving nonselective NSAIDs were classified as severe. All patients receiving COX-2 inhibitors and 91% of patients receiving nonselective NSAIDs exhibited risk factors that increased their risk to experience an ADE; all but 1 of these patients were receiving outpatient COX-2 inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed ADEs involving COX-2 inhibitors were similar to those associated with nonselective NSAIDs. Most events may have been preventable, highlighting the need for education regarding the appropriate use of COX-2 inhibitors.

Rofecoxib: an update on physicochemical, pharmaceutical, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic aspects

Rofecoxib (MK-966) is a new generation non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID) that exhibits promising anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity. It selectively inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 isoenzyme in a dose-dependent manner in man. No significant inhibition of COX-1 is observed with rofecoxib up to doses of 1000 mg. The pharmacokinetics of rofecoxib has been found to be complex and variable. Mean oral bioavailability after single dose of rofecoxib (12.5, 25 or 50 mg) is 93% with t(max) varying widely between 2 and 9 h. It is highly plasma-protein bound and is metabolized primarily by cytosolic reductases to inactive metabolites. Rofecoxib is eliminated predominantly by hepatic metabolism with a terminal half-life of approximately 17 h during steady state. Various experimental models and clinical studies have demonstrated rofecoxib to be superior, or at least equivalent, in anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic efficacy to comparator nonselective NSAIDs in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and other pain models. Emerging evidence suggests that rofecoxib may also find potential use as supportive therapy in various pathophysiologic conditions like Alzheimer's disease, and in various malignant tumours and polyps, where COX-2 is overly expressed. Rofecoxib is generally well-tolerated. Analysis of data pooled from several trials suggests that rofecoxib is associated with fewer incidences of clinically symptomatic gastrointestinal ulcers and ulcer complications vis-à-vis conventional NSAIDs. However, this gastropreserving effect may be negated by concurrent use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular risk reduction. Rofecoxib tends to show similar tolerability for renal and cardiothrombotic events as compared with nonnaproxen nonselective NSAIDs. No clinically significant drug interaction has been reported for rofecoxib except with diuretics, where it reverses their salt-wasting effect and thus can be clinically exploited in electrolyte-wasting disorders. There is only modest information about the physicochemical and pharmaceutical aspects of rofecoxib. Being poorly water soluble, its drug delivery has been improved using varied formulation approaches. Although it is stable in solid state, rofecoxib is photosensitive and base-sensitive in solution form with its degradation mechanistics elucidated. Analytical determinations of rofecoxib and its metabolites in biological fluids employing HPLC with varied types of detectors have been reported. Isolated studies have also been published on the chromatographic and spectrophotometric assay of rofecoxib and its degradants in bulk samples and pharmaceutical dosage forms. The current article provides an updated overview on the physicochemical, pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic vistas of rofecoxib.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of etoricoxib, a potent and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in healthy male volunteers

[(14)C]Etoricoxib (100 microCi/dose) was administered to six healthy male subjects (i.v., 25 mg; p.o., 100 mg). Following the i.v. dose, the plasma clearance was 57 ml/min, and the harmonic mean half-life was 24.8 h. Etoricoxib accounted for the majority of the radioactivity (approximately 75%) present in plasma following both i.v. and p.o. doses. The oral dose, administered as a solution in polyethylene glycol-400, was well absorbed (absolute bioavailability of approximately 83%). Total recovery of radioactivity in the excreta was 90% (i.v.) and 80% (p.o.), with 70% (i.v.) and 60% (p.o.) excreted in urine and 20% in feces after either route of administration. Radiochromatographic analysis of the excreta revealed that etoricoxib was metabolized extensively, and only a minor fraction of the dose (<1%) was excreted unchanged. Radiochromatograms of urine and feces showed that the 6'-carboxylic acid derivative of etoricoxib was the major metabolite observed (> or =65% of the total radioactivity). 6'-Hydroxymethyl-etoricoxib and etoricoxib-1'-N-oxide, as well as the O-beta-D-glucuronide conjugate and the 1'-N-oxide derivative of 6'-hydroxymethyl-etoricoxib, were present in the excreta also (individually, < or =10% of the total radioactivity). In healthy male subjects, therefore, etoricoxib is well absorbed, is metabolized extensively via oxidation (6'-methyl oxidation >1'-N-oxidation), and the metabolites are excreted largely in the urine.

Physician-reported management of edema and destabilized blood pressure in cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor users with osteoarthritis and treated hypertension

BACKGROUND

The addition of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug to the regimen of a patient with treated hypertension can cause a destabilization of blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe physician-reported management of clinically significant edema and/or destabilized blood pressure in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and hypertension when initiating therapy with rofecoxib or celecoxib.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was administered to physicians who attended one of several arthritis consultant programs sponsored by Pharmacia Corporation, with attendees selected by local sales representatives. Each program included a clinical presentation by a physician concerning the cardiorenal safety of celecoxib, followed by a consultative presentation and session led by a Pharmacia Clinical Education Manager.

RESULTS

A total of 828 physicians in the following specialties completed the survey: family practice (33.0%), internal medicine (25.0%), orthopedics (15.2%), and rheumatology (11.4%). Responding physicians expected that the majority of patients who experienced edema would contact them (68.4%). They reported that they schedule follow-up visits for blood pressure monitoring 65.6% of the time after initiating a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibitor, with family practitioners and internists most likely to indicate that they would do so and orthopedists least likely. Responding physicians indicated that the presence of edema and destabilized blood pressure generally led to discontinuation of the COX-2-specific inhibitor (58%-82% of the time). Internists and family practitioners were most likely to report that they treat edema by initiating or modifying diuretic therapy (33%-51% of the time). For destabilized blood pressure, an antihypertensive drug was reported to be initiated or modified 40% to 55% of the time by family practitioners and internists, whereas orthopedists indicated that they referred patients to the primary care provider. The COX-2-specific inhibitor prescribed resulted in management differences: physicians indicated that they were more likely to switch from rofecoxib to celecoxib in the event of edema or destabilized blood pressure, whereas they were more likely to adjust the celecoxib dose than the rofecoxib dose. Because the data were captured from convenience samples of physicians attending sponsored meetings, it is possible that respondents provided the answers they thought the sponsor would want. Because this was a cross-sectional survey, reported behavior was not compared with actual behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant percentage of physicians reported that they monitor patients with OA and hypertension for the occurrence of destabilized blood pressure and edema after initiation of a COX-2-specific inhibitor. Physicians indicated that they would nearly always intervene when either event is identified.