Clopidogrel Desensitization: Background and Recommendations for Use of a Rapid (4 Hour) Protocol

The purpose of this section is to educate the reader on how to successfully manage patients with a hypersensitivity reaction to clopidogrel using desensitization protocol based on various published protocols. Additionally, we will define drug desensitization, and describe the possible mechanism of how desensitization may function as alternative medication. The indications/contraindications for desensitization will be reviewed. The different published clopidogrel desensitization protocols will be discussed. Based on those protocols, we recommend a protocol we feel is safe and efficacious. Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine antiplatelet drug widely used for treatment and also employed for secondary prevention regarding a range of cardiovascular diseases. However, it has been reported to cause hypersensitivity reactions. Ticlopidine is an alternative medication that can be considered when patients have an allergic reaction to clopidogrel. Additionally, ticlopidine is associated with increased risk causing potentially life-threatening adverse reactions to include: Aplastic anemia, reversible neutropenia, and thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura vs. clopidogrel. Thus, clopidogrel desensitization offers an attractive alternative. Drug desensitization is defined as causing a temporary state of tolerance to a specific medication responsible for a hypersensitivity reaction. Furthermore, drug desensitization can only be maintained by continuous administration of this drug. Discussion: The exact immunologically mediated mechanism of how rapid oral desensitization works is not fully understood and yet to be defined. Ultimately desensitization results in causing antigen-specific mast cell tolerance. Various protocols have been published. The length of desensitization ranged from 2 h using 9 doses to 7 h using 15 doses. Recommendations: Taking the above into account, we recommend using a modification to the protocol that has the largest number of patients to undergo a standardized clopidogrel desensitization. This approach is shorter, as time has immense importance for these patients. Dosing starts at 10 mg dose and with 60 min intervals between doses, this now becomes a 4 h desensitization protocol.

Comparing Allergist and Cardiologist Considerations for the Optimal Management of Thienopyridines Hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The thienopyridine family includes ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel which are antiplatelet drugs largely used, mainly associated to aspirin, for treatment of acute coronary syndromes and after percutaneous coronary interventions, to avoid thrombosis. In some patients, thienpyridines may cause hypersensitivity reactions which jeopardize the optimal therapeutic and preventive approach to vascular diseases. The management of thienopyridine hypersensitivity seems to be best done as an interdisciplinary collaboration between the allergist and cardiologist.

METHOD

The present study investigates the management of thienopyridines hypersensitivity on the basis of published case reports and studies, comparing the pro and contro of pharmacological treatments, different desensitization protocols to thienopyridines and substitution of antiplatelet agents eaches others, according to the point of view of cardiologist and allergist. For the cardiologist, the important issues are the necessity of continuing therapy, the desired duration of therapy based on the clinical indication of the individual patient and appropriateness of using one of the alternative P2Y12 inhibitors. For the allergist, the important issues are weighing the risk and benefits of the various therapeutic options: treating "through" desensitization, or switching to an alternative agent.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

All the data seem to suggest that only working together, a cardio-allergy team of specialists may evaluate and offer the best approach to clinical decision-making for the individual patient.

Use of Alternative Antiplatelet Agents for Clopidogrel Hypersensitivity

Clopidogrel is a widely used agent for secondary prevention of vascular events and is a cornerstone of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) post coronary stent implantation. Hypersensitivity reactions to clopidogrel are well documented and may range from localized to systemic in presentation. This can lead to discontinuation of therapy, thus increasing the risk of vascular events. The authors have developed recommendations for potential alternative agents for the management of clopidogrel hypersensitivity reactions. Proposed strategies include treatment with an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor, cilostazol or warfarin.

A joint allergist/cardiologist classification for thienopyridines hypersensitivity reactions based on their symptomatic patterns and its impact on the management strategies

The role and importance of thienopyridines such as ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel is well-established for several indications, ranging from prevention of acute coronary syndromes to percutaneous coronary interventions, where the dual antiplatelet therapy represents the gold standard to avoid denovo coronary stenosis. However, there is a significant cohort of patients with coronary artery disease who may manifest hypersensitivity reactions to thienopyridines. The examination of the various case reports from medical literature leads to identify mainly four clinical patterns of hypersensitivity to thienopyridines which involves more frequently cutaneous, hematologic, and articular tissues, therefore the kind and predominance of clinical symptoms may determine a different clinical approach to overcome or neutralize thienopyridines hypersensitivity.

Oral antiplatelet agent hypersensitivity and cross-reactivity managed by successful desensitisation

Oral platelet aggregation inhibitors are widely used for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary stent thrombosis. Premature discontinuation following percutaneous coronary intervention would pose a grave risk of in-stent thrombosis, acute myocardial infarction and eventual death. Although they share the same mechanism of adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibition, they belong to either the chemical class of thienopyridines (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticlopidine) or cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidines (ticagrelor and cangrelor). This case describes the first documented cross-reactive hypersensitivity of clopidogrel towards both its fellow thienopyridine, prasugrel, as well as the structurally dissimilar ticagrelor, and its subsequent successful desensitisation.

Leucocytoclastic vasculitis as a late complication of clopidogrel therapy

We describe a case of leucocytoclastic vasculitis manifested as exanthematous rash in a 57-year-old woman on long-term therapy with clopidogrel. The diagnosis was confirmed by skin biopsy. The patient was managed symptomatically with oral antihistaminics and topical steroids in consultation with dermatologists. Clopidogrel therapy was discontinued on suspicion of drug-induced vasculitis. The rash resolved completely within 2 weeks of withdrawal of clopidogrel, satisfying criteria for a probable adverse drug reaction. Leucocytoclastic vasculitis is an unusual adverse effect of clopidogrel therapy and even rarer as a late complication.

Recurrent acute stent thrombosis due to allergic reaction secondary to clopidogrel therapy

Despite significant benefits including mortality advantage demonstrated with antiplatelet therapy in large clinical trials, the occurrence of adverse ischemic events, including stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention has been the challenging and devastating complication. Clopidogrel as a monotherapy, or more common in combination with aspirin, represents a cornerstone of modern pharmacotherapy in the invasive era. Although vigilance in maintenance of this dual antiplatelet treatment is mandatory, obligatory cessation of one of these agents can be observed in rare circumstances of adverse events. We describe a patient who developed recurrent acute stent thrombosis associated with clopidogrel-induced allergic reaction and discuss our therapeutic considerations.

Management of clopidogrel hypersensitivity without drug interruption

Clopidogrel hypersensitivity affects up to 6% of treated patients, often leading to discontinuation of the drug. Conventional desensitization protocols incorporate a washout period off medication that may be problematic after percutaneous coronary intervention because premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is a major risk factor for stent thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a strategy for treating clopidogrel hypersensitivity without drug interruption using corticosteroids and antihistamines to facilitate development of physiologic tolerance. The study population consisted of 25 consecutive patients who developed clopidogrel hypersensitivity after percutaneous coronary intervention and were managed with suppressive therapy using corticosteroids and antihistamines. Treatment success (resolution of hypersensitivity symptoms without interrupting clopidogrel) was assessed, in addition to duration of clopidogrel therapy and adverse cardiac events during late follow-up (mean 670 ± 630 days). The cohort included 19 men and 6 women with a mean age of 62 ± 9 years. Drug-eluting stents were used in 16 patients (64%). Clopidogrel hypersensitivity occurred 6 ± 2 days after drug initiation. Treatment included corticosteroids (5 patients), antihistamines (5 patients), or corticosteroids and antihistamines (15 patients). Patients treated with corticosteroids received tapering courses for a mean of 10 ± 8 days. Treatment was successful with sustained symptom resolution in 22 of 25 patients (88%). Clopidogrel therapy was continued in successfully desensitized patients for 417 ± 369 days and in patients with drug-eluting stents for 529 ± 376 days. There were no deaths, myocardial infarctions, or stent thrombosis during extended follow-up. In conclusion, clopidogrel hypersensitivity can be successfully treated using short-course corticosteroids and antihistamines without interrupting drug therapy. This technique enables long-term continuation of clopidogrel and confers a low risk of adverse cardiac events.

Profound thrombocytopenia induced by clopidogrel with a prior history of long-term safe administration

Clopidogrel has shown an excellent safety, tolerability and efficacy ever since its marketing. However, here we report a rare case with profound thrombocytopenia following clopidogrel administration previously safely exposed to this same drug. This reminds us that thrombocytopenia might be induced by clopidogrel even with a prior, safe history of long-term administration.

Clopidogrel Hypersensitivity: A Novel Multi-Day Outpatient Oral Desensitization Regimen

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel hypersensitivity has posed a problem for the acute treatment and long-term care of a particular patient population with coronary artery disease and stent placement. Patients with clopidogrel hypersensitivity have had an increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, if they ingest clopidogrel without undergoing an oral desensitization procedure. The previously published desensitization protocols have either been performed in the intensive care unit, requiring significant cost and healthcare utilization, or have required a full-day outpatient commitment on behalf of the patient.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a multi-day outpatient oral clopidogrel desensitization protocol is effective and safe for patients with clopidogrel hypersensitivity.

METHODS

gWe retrospectively assessed the efficacy of a 10-dose outpatient multiday clopidogrel desensitization protocol performed in a university allergy-immunology center from April 2006 to October 2008 in patients with clopidogrel hypersensitivity. Patients were desensitized over 2–3 half-day clinical visits and were able to go home between desensitization sessions. A preliminary cost analysis was performed using the average of actual costs for the outpatient clopidogrel desensitization procedure and was compared with the average cost for an inpatient oral desensitization completed at our institution.

RESULTS

Eight patients with coronary artery disease, cardiac stent placement, and clopidogrel hypersensitivity underwent an outpatient multi-day oral clopidogrel desensitization procedure. All patients were successfully desensitized with the multi-day protocol without complications. No patient had recurrence of allergic reaction 3 months after the procedure. A preliminary cost analysis demonstrated a lower cost for the outpatient compared to the inpatient oral clopidogrel desensitization protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

This outpatient 10-dose multi-day clopidogrel desensitization protocol is a safe and effective novel approach for the treatment of clopidogrel hypersensitivity in patients with coronary artery disease and cardiac stent placement. In addition to safety and efficacy, this protocol offers the patient the convenience of avoiding hospital admission or full-day time commitments.

A novel strategy for managing clopidogrel-induced adverse skin reactions

AIMS

We conducted a prospective observational study using a course of steroids and antihistamines to treat a cohort of patients who developed skin reactions to clopidogrel, to assess whether dual antiplatelet therapy could be continued in an outpatient setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 2,701 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at our centre over a 23 month period. Patients with skin reactions to clopidogrel were identified and then commenced on five days oral prednisolone (30 mg/od) and chlorpheniramine (4 mg/tds) for seven days. A subsequent telephone survey was performed to evaluate a number of variables. The probability of the adverse reaction being secondary to clopidogrel was assessed using the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. Twenty (0.7%) patients were identified who developed adverse skin reactions to clopidogrel. There was complete resolution seen in the majority (89%) of patients within an average of 3.2 days following treatment. One patient had partial resolution, and one had no response to treatment, but both were able to continue clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a novel, safe and effective way of managing clopidogrel-induced skin reactions using a short course of prednisolone and chlorpheniramine, without stopping or substituting clopidogrel.