Pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol in critically ill neonates

The impact of extracorporeal support on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Infections represent a major risk for critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients requiring extracorporeal life-saving support such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). Patient outcomes rely on achieving target antimicrobial concentrations. In critically ill adults on extracorporeal support, suboptimal antimicrobial concentrations have been shown to be common. Our objective was to systematically review antimicrobial pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill term neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and/or CRRT and compare them to similar cohorts of patients not receiving ECMO or CRRT.

METHODS

Studies published between 1990 and 2022 were identified through systematic searches in PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Google Scholar and CINAHL. Studies were included which provided antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters (volume of distribution and clearance) in the neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and/or CRRT. Studies were excluded if no antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters were described or could be calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-four pharmacokinetic studies were identified describing 737 patients, with neonatal patients recruited in 70% of the ECMO studies and <1% of the CRRT studies. Of all the studies, 50% were case reports or case series. The pharmacokinetics were altered for gentamicin, daptomycin, ceftolozane, micafungin, voriconazole, cefepime, fluconazole, piperacillin, and vancomycin, although considerable patient variability was described.

CONCLUSION

Significant gaps remain in our understanding of the pharmacokinetic alterations in neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and CRRT support.

The expert clinical pharmacological advice program for tailoring on real-time antimicrobial therapies with emerging TDM candidates in special populations: how the ugly duckling turned into a swan

INTRODUCTION

The growing spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens makes the need of tailoring antimicrobial therapies by means of a 'patient-centered' approach fundamental. In this scenario, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of emerging antimicrobial candidates may be a valuable approach, but expert interpretation of TDM results should be granted for making them more clinically useful. The MD Clinical Pharmacologist may take over this task since this specialist may couple PK/PD expertise on drugs with a medical background and may provide expert interpretation of TDM results of antimicrobials for tailoring therapy on real-time in each single patient based on specific both drug/pathogen issues and patient issues.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to highlight the main key-points and organizational aspects for implementing a successful TDM-based expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program for tailoring antimicrobial therapies on real-time in different hospitalized patient special populations.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM-based ECPA programs lead by the MD Clinical Pharmacologist may represent a way forward for maximizing clinical efficacy and for minimizing the risk of resistance developments and/or toxicity of antimicrobials. Stakeholders should be aware of the fact that this innovative approach may be cost-effective.

A Proof of Concept of the Role of TDM-Based Clinical Pharmacological Advices in Optimizing Antimicrobial Therapy on Real-Time in Different Paediatric Settings

Introduction: Antimicrobial treatment is quite common among hospitalized children. The dynamic age-associated physiological variations coupled with the pathophysiological alterations caused by underlying illness and potential drug-drug interactions makes the implementation of appropriate antimicrobial dosing extremely challenging among paediatrics. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may represent a valuable tool for assisting clinicians in optimizing antimicrobial exposure. Clinical pharmacological advice (CPA) is an approach based on the correct interpretation of the TDM result by the MD Clinical Pharmacologist in relation to specific underlying conditions, namely the antimicrobial susceptibility of the clinical isolate, the site of infection, the pathophysiological characteristics of the patient and/or the drug-drug interactions of cotreatments. The aim of this study was to assess the role of TDM-based CPAs in providing useful recommendations for the real-time personalization of antimicrobial dosing regimens in various paediatric settings. Materials and methods: Paediatric patients who were admitted to different settings of the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna, Italy (paediatric intensive care unit [ICU], paediatric onco-haematology, neonatology, and emergency paediatric ward), between January 2021 and June 2021 and who received TDM-based CPAs on real-time for personalization of antimicrobial therapy were retrospectively assessed. Demographic and clinical features, CPAs delivered in relation to different settings and antimicrobials, and type of dosing adjustments were extracted. Two indicators of performance were identified. The number of dosing adjustments provided over the total number of delivered CPAs. The turnaround time (TAT) of CPAs according to a predefined scale (optimal, <12 h; quasi-optimal, between 12-24 h; acceptable, between 24-48 h; suboptimal, >48 h). Results: Overall, 247 CPAs were delivered to 53 paediatric patients (mean 4.7 ± 3.7 CPAs/patient). Most were delivered to onco-haematological patients (39.6%) and to ICU patients (35.8%), and concerned mainly isavuconazole (19.0%) and voriconazole (17.8%). Overall, CPAs suggested dosing adjustments in 37.7% of cases (24.3% increases and 13.4% decreases). Median TAT was 7.5 h (IQR 6.1-8.8 h). Overall, CPAs TAT was optimal in 91.5% of cases, and suboptimal in only 0.8% of cases. Discussion: Our study provides a proof of concept of the helpful role that TDM-based real-time CPAs may have in optimizing antimicrobial exposure in different challenging paediatric scenarios.

Gentamicin Dosing in Neonates with Normal Renal Function: Trough and Peak Levels

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Gentamicin is commonly used in neonates, and it requires drug concentration monitoring. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of high trough (≥ 2 mg/l) and therapeutic peak serum gentamicin concentrations (5-12 mg/l) using our current gentamicin regimen and to adjust the dosing regimen accordingly and reassess.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of neonates, with normal renal function, who were prescribed gentamicin. Group 1: March 2014-July 2017-gentamicin intravenous (IV) 2.5 mg/kg given every 36 h if < 30 weeks gestational age (GA) and every 24 h if ≥ 30 weeks GA; Group 2: August 2019-February 2020-gentamicin IV 3.5 mg/kg given every 36 h if < 30 weeks GA and every 24 h if ≥ 30 weeks GA. We assessed the number of neonates with aberrant trough and peak serum gentamicin concentrations.

RESULTS

Forty-eight neonates < 30 weeks GA and 34 ≥ 30 weeks GA were given 2.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Eleven (23%) neonates < 30 weeks GA and four (13%) ≥ 30 weeks GA had subtherapeutic peak concentrations (< 5 mg/l); none had supratherapeutic (> 12 mg/l) or toxic trough concentrations (≥ 2 mg/l). Forty-four neonates < 30 weeks GA and 54 ≥ 30 weeks GA were given 3.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Eighty-four (86%) had non-toxic trough concentrations (< 2 mg/l). One (1%) < 30 weeks GA neonate had subtherapeutic (< 5 mg/l) and one (1%) neonate ≥ 30 weeks GA had supratherapeutic (> 12 mg/l) peak concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin regimen of 2.5 mg/kg given every 36 h for neonates < 30 weeks GA and every 24 h for neonates ≥ 30 weeks GA was suboptimal at achieving therapeutic gentamicin peak. Increasing the dosage to 3.5 mg/kg achieved therapeutic peak concentrations in 98% and non-toxic trough concentrations in 86% of all neonates (prior to dose interval adjustment).

Simplified Dosing Regimens for Gentamicin in Neonatal Sepsis

Background: The effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of severe bacterial infections in newborns in resource-limited settings has been determined by empirical evidence. However, such an approach does not warrant optimal exposure to antibiotic agents, which are known to show different disposition characteristics in this population. Here we evaluate the rationale for a simplified regimen of gentamicin taking into account the effect of body size and organ maturation on pharmacokinetics. The analysis is supported by efficacy data from a series of clinical trials in this population.

Methods: A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate gentamicin concentration vs. time profiles in a virtual cohort of neonates. Model predictive performance was assessed by supplementary external validation procedures using therapeutic drug monitoring data collected in neonates and young infants with or without sepsis. Subsequently, clinical trial simulations were performed to characterize the exposure to intra-muscular gentamicin after a q.d. regimen. The selection of a simplified regimen was based on peak and trough drug levels during the course of treatment.

Results: In contrast to current World Health Organization guidelines, which recommend gentamicin doses between 5 and 7.5 mg/kg, our analysis shows that gentamicin can be used as a fixed dose regimen according to three weight-bands: 10 mg for patients with body weight <2.5 kg, 16 mg for patients with body weight between 2.5 and 4 kg, and 30 mg for those with body weight >4 kg.

Conclusion: The choice of the dose of an antibiotic must be supported by a strong scientific rationale, taking into account the differences in drug disposition in the target patient population. Our analysis reveals that a simplified regimen is feasible and could be used in resource-limited settings for the treatment of sepsis in neonates and young infants with sepsis aged 0–59 days.

Simulated Comparison of a Bayesian Clinical Decision Support System Versus Standard of Care For Achieving Gentamicin Pharmacokinetic Targets in Neonates

BACKGROUND

Gentamicin therapy in neonates is optimized through achieving specific peak and trough concentrations. The objective of this study was to compare the ability a Bayesian clinical decision support system (CDSS) with standard of care (SOC) in determining personalized gentamicin therapies for neonates, at regimen initiation and in response to measured drug concentrations.

METHODS

This retrospective review and simulation compared target attainment among 4 arms: historical dosing according to SOC, via nomogram for initial dosing (SOC-initial) and via clinician judgment in response to measured concentrations (SOC-adjusted), and simulated dosing using the CDSS, incorporating a neonatal pharmacokinetic model for initial dosing (CDSS-initial) and incorporating maximum a posteriori-Bayesian analysis in response to measured concentrations (CDSS-adjusted). "True" patient pharmacokinetic parameters and peak and trough concentration predictions were calculated via the CDSS using the entirety of the patient dosing and concentration history. The primary outcome was pharmacokinetic target attainment of desired gentamicin peak and trough concentrations.

RESULTS

The study included 564 gentamicin concentrations among 339 patients. Mean demographics were 35 weeks gestational age (52% premature births) and 2.44 kg dosing weight. Mean PK parameters were 0.0533 L/h/kg clearance, 0.458 L/kg volume of distribution, and 8.66 hours half-life. Peak concentrations in the desired range were achieved in 96% of significantly more often in the CDSS-initial regimens and 94% of CDSS-adjusted regimens versus 86% of SOC-initial regimens and 66% of SOC-adjusted regimens. No difference was found in trough target attainment among study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In simulation, a Bayesian CDSS showed superiority to SOC in achieving gentamicin pharmacokinetic exposure targets in neonates. Use of a CDSS may improve the safety and efficacy of gentamicin therapy for neonates.

Optimizing gentamicin conventional and extended interval dosing in neonates using Monte Carlo simulation - a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although aminoglycosides are routinely used in neonates, controversy exists regarding empiric dosing regimens. The objectives were to determine gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates, and develop initial mg/kg dosing recommendations that optimized target peak and trough concentration attainment for conventional and extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens.

METHODS

Patient demographics and steady-state gentamicin concentration data were retrospectively collected for 60 neonates with no renal impairment admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Mean pharmacokinetics were calculated and multiple linear regression was performed to determine significant covariates of clearance (L/h) and volume of distribution (L). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified breakpoints for significant covariates. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was used to determine optimal dosing recommendations for each CART-identified sub-group.

RESULTS

Gentamicin clearance and volume of distribution were significantly associated with weight at gentamicin initiation. CART-identified breakpoints for weight at gentamicin initiation were: ≤ 850 g, 851-1200 g, and > 1200 g. MCS identified that a conventional dose of gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg given every 48 h or an EID of 8-9 mg/kg administered every 72 h in neonates weighing ≤ 850 g, and every 24 and 48 h, respectively, in neonates weighing 851-1200 g, provided the best probability of attaining conventional (peak: 5-10 mg/L and trough: ≤ 2 mg/L) and EID targets (peak:12-20 mg/L, trough:≤ 0.5 mg/L). Insufficient sample size in the > 1200 g neonatal group precluded further investigation of this weight category.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides initial gentamicin dosing recommendations that optimize target attainment for conventional and EID regimens in neonates weighing ≤ 1200 g. Prospective validation and empiric dose optimization for neonates > 1200 g is needed.

Pharmacometrics in Pediatrics

Pharmacometrics have advanced from compartmental analysis to noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetics that require complicated mathematical programs. These sophisticated mathematical analyses determine not only the usual pharmacometric measures of clearance and volume of distribution but also the effects of covariates on these measures. Although these analyses are very suitable to studies of small patient populations often encountered in pediatric studies, most pediatric clinicians have not been trained in how these analyses are conducted or the meaning of the results of these analyses expressed in terms of error measures and fixed and variable effects. In addition, clinicians may not be able to evaluate whether their patient population is adequately represented in the analysis. Thorough and clear descriptions of the methodology and the strengths and weaknesses of these analyses need to be published in journals read by clinicians.

Relationship between amikacin blood concentration and ototoxicity in low birth weight infants

Amikacin (AMK) is used as empiric therapy for severe infections such as sepsis in low birth weight (LBW) infants. AMK administered once daily (OD) in adults is reported to be therapeutically effective and prevent side effects, however, evidence on AMK administration in LBW infants is limited, with no clear indications of effectiveness. We performed therapeutic drug monitoring analysis of 20 infants treated with AMK OD for severe infections such as bacteremia. Treatment effectiveness was admitted by the patients' medical records, and side effects of renal dysfunction and ototoxicity were investigated. The mean gestational age was 30.4 ± 5 weeks and mean body weight (Bw) was 1280.2 ± 809.8 g. The mean AMK dose was 14.1 ± 2.6 mg/kg and mean administration period was 10.1 ± 4.1 days. Blood concentration was measured 6.3 ± 2.3 days after AMK administration; mean peak and trough concentrations were 29.1 ± 7.5 μg/mL and 7.6 ± 6.9 μg/mL, respectively. Additionally, therapeutic effect was observed in all patients, and no significant change in serum creatinine (CRE) concentration (a marker of renal dysfunction) was observed, suggesting no renal dysfunction. Ototoxicity was observed in 4 patients, 3 of whom had trough concentrations ≥10 μg/mL. When we categorized patients into two groups using a trough cut-off value of 10 μg/mL, no difference in AMK dose was observed. However, there were significant differences in peak concentration, Bw, volume of distribution and CRE. Our findings suggest AMK trough concentration ≥10 μg/mL significantly affects ototoxicity in neonates.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Animal studies and trials in older children and adults suggest that a 'one dose per day' regimen of gentamicin is superior to a 'multiple doses per day' regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library (searched 8 April 2016), MEDLINE (1966 to 8 April 2016), Embase (1980 to 8 April 2016), and CINAHL (December 1982 to 8 April 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ('once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ('multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were included (N = 574) and 28 excluded. All except one study enrolled infants of more than 32 weeks' gestation. Limited information suggested that infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimens showed adequate clearance of sepsis (typical RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.19; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.19; 3 trials; N = 37). 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen was associated with fewer failures to attain peak level of at least 5 µg/ml (typical RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.47; typical RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.08; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 8; 9 trials; N = 422); and fewer failures to achieve trough levels of 2 µg/ml or less (typical RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.55; typical RD -0.22, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.15; NNTB = 4; 11 trials; N = 503). 'Once a day' gentamicin achieved higher peak levels (MD 2.58, 95% CI 2.26 to 2.89; 10 trials; N = 440) and lower trough levels (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.44; 10 trials; N = 440) than 'multiple doses a day' regimen. There was no significant difference in ototoxicity between two groups (typical RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.18 to 16.25; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05; 5 trials; N = 214). Nephrotoxicity was not noted with either of the treatment regimens. Overall, the quality of evidence was considered to be moderate on GRADE analysis, given the small sample size and unclear/high risk of bias in some of the domains in a few of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether a 'once a day' or a 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However, data suggest that pharmacokinetic properties of a 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to a 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There was no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on the assessment of pharmacokinetics, a 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating sepsis in neonates of more than 32 weeks' gestation.

Clinical Pharmacology Studies in Critically Ill Children

Developmental and physiological changes in children contribute to variation in drug disposition with age. Additionally, critically ill children suffer from various life-threatening conditions that can lead to pathophysiological alterations that further affect pharmacokinetics (PK). Some factors that can alter PK in this patient population include variability in tissue distribution caused by protein binding changes and fluid shifts, altered drug elimination due to organ dysfunction, and use of medical interventions that can affect drug disposition (e.g., extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy). Performing clinical studies in critically ill children is challenging because there is large inter-subject variability in the severity and time course of organ dysfunction; some critical illnesses are rare, which can affect subject enrollment; and critically ill children usually have multiple organ failure, necessitating careful selection of a study design. As a result, drug dosing in critically ill children is often based on extrapolations from adults or non-critically ill children. Dedicated clinical studies in critically ill children are urgently needed to identify optimal dosing of drugs in this vulnerable population. This review will summarize the effect of critical illness on pediatric PK, the challenges associated with performing studies in this vulnerable subpopulation, and the clinical PK studies performed to date for commonly used drugs.

Extended-interval gentamicin dosing in achieving therapeutic concentrations in malaysian neonates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of extended-interval gentamicin dosing practiced in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and special care nursery (SCN) of a Malaysian hospital.

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study with pharmacokinetic analysis of all patients aged ≤28 days who received gentamicin treatment in NICU/SCN. Subjects received dosing according to a regimen modified from an Australian-based pediatric guideline. During a study period of 3 months, subjects were evaluated for gestational age, body weight, serum creatinine concentration, gentamicin dose/interval, serum peak and trough concentrations, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Descriptive percentages were used to determine the overall dosing accuracy, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the accuracy rates among different gestational ages. Pharmacokinetic profile among different gestational age and body weight groups were compared by using ANOVA.

RESULTS

Of the 113 subjects included, 82.3% (n = 93) achieved therapeutic concentrations at the first drug-monitoring assessment. There was no significant difference found between the percentage of term neonates who achieved therapeutic concentrations and the premature group (87.1% vs. 74.4%), p = 0.085. A total of 112 subjects (99.1%) achieved desired therapeutic trough concentration of <2 mg/L. Mean gentamicin peak concentration was 8.52 mg/L (95% confidence interval [Cl], 8.13-8.90 mg/L) and trough concentration was 0.54 mg/L (95% CI, 0.48-0.60 mg/L). Mean volume of distribution, half-life, and elimination rate were 0.65 L/kg (95% CI, 0.62-0.68 L/kg), 6.96 hours (95% CI, 6.52-7.40 hours), and 0.11 hour(-1) (95% CI, 0.10-0.11 hour(-1)), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The larger percentage of subjects attaining therapeutic range with extended-interval gentamicin dosing suggests that this regimen is appropriate and can be safely used among Malaysian neonates.

Gentamicin trough levels using a simplified extended-interval dosing regimen in preterm and term newborns

To evaluate a simplified gentamicin extended-interval dosing regimen in a large cohort of preterm and term newborns, we conducted a retrospective cohort study over a 4-year period. All inborn newborns who received gentamicin for the first episode of suspected or proven sepsis were eligible. Newborns received 4 mg/kg gentamicin intravenously 24-hourly, except for those at <28 weeks of gestation who received gentamicin 36-hourly. Trough levels were taken before the third dose and considered non-toxic if ≤2 μg/mL. Infants were analysed in gestational age subgroups: <28 weeks, 28-31 weeks, 32-35 weeks, 36-39 weeks and ≥40 weeks. Newborns who received indomethacin co-medication were analysed separately. Nine hundred ninety-three newborns, gestational age range 23(+2)-42(+1) weeks, birth weight range 397-5936 g, were included. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) gentamicin trough level for all newborns was 1.3 μg/mL (0.8-1.7). Ninety per cent of newborns had non-toxic trough levels. The incidence of trough levels >2 μg/mL was between 2.2 and 9.7 % in all subgroups except for infants born at 28-31 weeks of gestation, where 21.7 % of trough levels were >2 μg/mL. Indomethacin co-medication significantly increased the median gentamicin trough level in preterm infants at <32 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that simplified gentamicin dosage regimens are feasible. Prospective evaluations are required to establish safety profiles.

Stochastic process pharmacodynamics: dose timing in neonatal gentamicin therapy as an example

We consider dosing regimens designed to cure patients by eradicating colony forming units (CFU) such as bacteria. In the field of "population" pharmaco-kinetics/dynamics (PK/PD), inter-individual variability (IIV) of patients is estimated using model parameter statistical distributions. We consider a more probabilistic approach to IIV called stochastic process theory, motivated by the fact that tumor treatment planning uses both approaches. Stochastic process PD can supply additional insights and suggest different dosing regimens due to its emphasis on the probability of complete CFU eradication and its predictions on "pure chance" fluctuations of CFU number per patient when treatment has reduced this integer to less than ~100. To exemplify the contrast between stochastic process PD models and standard deterministic PD models, which track only average CFU number, we analyze, neglecting immune responses, neonatal intravenous gentamicin dosing regimens directed against Escherichia coli. Our stochastic calculations predict that the first dose is crucial for CFU eradication. For example, a single 6 mg/kg dose is predicted to have a higher eradication probability than four daily 4 mg/kg doses. We conclude: (1) neonatal gentamicin dosing regimens with larger first doses but smaller total doses deserve investigation; (2) in general, if standard PK/PD models predict average CFU number drops substantially below 100, the models should be modified to incorporate stochastic effects more accurately, and will then usually make more favorable, or less unfavorable, predictions for front boosting ("hit hard early"). Various caveats against over-interpreting the calculations are given.

High-dose gentamicin in newborn infants: is it safe?

Dosing regimens often recommend lower gentamicin doses in neonates (3-5 mg/kg) than in older children (7 mg/kg or more) despite the higher volume of distribution in neonates. We studied an extended-interval high-dose (6 mg/kg) gentamicin regimen in a single tertiary neonatal unit from 2004-2012. During the first week of life, dosing interval was 24 h for term infants, 36 h for preterm infants with gestational age (GA) 29-36 weeks and 48 h for preterm infants with GA <29 weeks. After the first week of life, dosing interval was 24 h if corrected age (GA + postnatal age) ≥29 weeks and 36 h if corrected age <29 weeks. Outcome measures were trough plasma concentration (TPC), ototoxicity and prescription errors. In 546 treatment episodes, TPC was measured prior to the third gentamicin dose. There were 37 episodes (6.7 %) of prescription errors, mainly a too long dosing interval. We included 509 treatment episodes (440 infants) in the final analysis. Mean (standard deviation) gentamicin TPC during the first week of life was 1.1 (0.5) mg/L and after the first week of life 0.8 (0.6) mg/L. In 31 (6 %) episodes, TPC was ≥2.0 mg/L, predominantly among term infants with renal impairment. Thirty-eight patients failed the neonatal hearing screening, but only four of these 38 had permanent hearing loss. All four had a TPC <2.0 mg/L. Conclusions: This extended-interval high-dose gentamicin regimen was associated with low numbers of elevated TPCs, low numbers of prescription errors and no evidence for ototoxicity.

Extended interval dosing of gentamicin in premature neonates ≤ 28-week gestation

AIM

To evaluate an extended interval dosing (EID) regimen of gentamicin in neonates ≤28-week gestation.

METHODS

In 2008, an EID regimen for gentamicin was introduced for all neonates admitted to the NICU in Calgary. The dosing interval was based on a 22 h level after the first dose of 5mg/kg. We conducted an observational study in 33 infants ≤28-week gestation on the EID regimen from the first day of life and compared gentamicin peak and trough levels with a historical control of 34 infants who received gentamicin in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 24 h (TID, traditional interval dosing).

RESULTS

In the EID group, based on the 22 h level, dosing interval was 36 h in 20 neonates and 48 h in 13 neonates. All neonates, except one, achieved therapeutic peak and trough levels. Compared to the TID group, the EID group had higher peak levels (median 9.8 μg/mL vs. 4.6 μg/mL, p < 0.001) with no difference in trough levels. With target peak levels of 5-12 μg/mL and trough levels of <2 μg/mL, a higher proportion of neonates in the TID group would need dose adjustment.

CONCLUSION

In neonates ≤ 28-week gestation, an EID regimen from day one of life, using a single level 22 h after the first dose for dosing interval, achieves therapeutic peak and trough levels and more optimum peak levels as compared to a TID regimen.

Use of 4-mg/kg/24-hour empiric aminoglycoside dosing in preoperative neonates with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Empiric dosing of gentamicin has not been evaluated in critically ill neonates with unrepaired congenital heart disease (CHD). Many factors may alter gentamicin pharmacokinetics in this patient population and there are few data describing gentamicin dosing regimens in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an empiric gentamicin dosing regimen for neonates achieves acceptable serum trough concentrations in neonatal patients with unrepaired CHD receiving alprostadil.

METHODS

Term neonates with unrepaired CHD who received gentamicin for empiric treatment of sepsis were identified over a 3-year period. Patients were included if they received gentamicin 4 mg/kg/dose every 24 hours, were receiving alprostadil for maintenance of a patent ductus arteriosus, and had at least one gentamicin serum trough concentration determined. Patients were evaluated to determine whether they achieved a serum trough concentration of <1 mg/L, and differences in patient characteristics were noted for those who achieved an appropriate trough concentration and those who did not.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients met study criteria, and 22% of patients had a trough gentamicin concentration of <1 mg/L at a mean (SD) time of 23.6 (0.3) hours after a dose. Few statistically significant differences in patient characteristics were noted for those who achieved an appropriate serum trough concentration and those who did not, and included Apgar scores at 1 minute and later day of life at admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Current empiric gentamicin dosing regimens may not be appropriate for critically ill neonates with unrepaired CHD. Routine serum concentration monitoring may be warranted in this population.

Validation of a dosage individualization table for extended-interval gentamicin in neonates

BACKGROUND

Extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing is increasingly used in neonates; however, guidance on how to monitor concentrations and adjust dosages accordingly is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively validate the use of a 22-hour gentamicin concentration dosing table for the individualization of extended-interval dosing in the neonatal population by examining the peak and trough concentrations achieved through its use.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out on gentamicin concentrations achieved using a 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentration dosing table for determining dosing intervals in neonates. Neonates (N = 104) in the first week of life, gestational age 23 weeks to full term, in level II and III neonatal intensive care units were included. Neonates were given gentamicin 5 mg/kg intravenously; a table using 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentrations was then used to individualize dosing intervals. Pre- and post-serum gentamicin concentrations on the dosing interval indicated were measured with the second or third doses and used to calculate the peak and trough concentrations achieved.

RESULTS

Use of the 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentration dosing table resulted in dosing intervals that provided appropriate peak (mean 10.55 mg/L) and trough (mean 0.75 mg/L) concentrations (with second or third doses) in all neonates. All patients had trough concentrations less than 2 mg/L, and 73% had a trough concentration less than 1 mg/L. No peak concentrations were less than 5 mg/L, 82% of patients had a peak concentration from 5 to 12 mg/L, and the remaining 18% had concentrations from 12.1 to 16 mg/L. Peak and trough concentrations were similar across all gestational ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentration dosing table to individualize extended-interval gentamicin dosages in neonates resulted in appropriate peak and trough concentrations in all neonates studied. Use of this table will result in appropriate extended-interval aminoglycoside dosages in neonates early in treatment, using a single serum concentration.

Pharmacokinetic changes in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass used to temporarily sustain cardiac and/or respiratory function in critically ill patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation further complicates the management of critically ill patients who already have profound physiologic derangements with consequent altered pharmacokinetics. The purpose of this study is to identify and critically review the published literature describing pharmacokinetics in the presence of ECMO. This review revealed a dearth of data describing pharmacokinetics during ECMO in critically ill adults, with most of the available data originating in neonates. Of concern, the present data indicate substantial variability and a lack of predictability in drug behavior in the presence of ECMO. The most common mechanisms by which ECMO affects pharmacokinetics are sequestration in the circuit, increased volume of distribution, and decreased drug elimination. While lipophilic drugs and highly protein-bound drugs (eg, voriconazole and fentanyl) are significantly sequestered in the circuit, hydrophilic drugs (eg, β-lactam antibiotics, glycopeptides) are significantly affected by hemodilution and other pathophysiologic changes that occur during ECMO. Although the published literature is insufficient to make any meaningful recommendations for adjusting therapy for drug dosing, this review systematically describes the available data enabling clinicians to make conclusions based on available data. Furthermore, this review serves to highlight the need for well-designed and conducted clinical and laboratory-based studies to provide the data from which robust dosing guidance can be developed to improve clinical outcomes in this most unwell cohort of patients.

Mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity and targets of hair cell protection

Aminoglycosides are commonly prescribed antibiotics with deleterious side effects to the inner ear. Due to their popular application as a result of their potent antimicrobial activities, many efforts have been undertaken to prevent aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Over the years, understanding of the antimicrobial as well as ototoxic mechanisms of aminoglycosides has increased. These mechanisms are reviewed in regard to established and potential future targets of hair cell protection.

Comparative evaluation of six extended-interval gentamicin dosing regimens in premature and full-term neonates

PURPOSE

Six extended-interval gentamicin dosing regimens were comparatively evaluated in premature and full-term neonates.

METHODS

Data regarding six physician-ordered dosing regimens of gentamicin for neonates in a hospital neonatal intensive care unit were collected and analyzed. Neonates of gestational age (GA) 29 weeks or younger received 4.5 mg/kg every 48 hours. Neonates of GA 30-34 weeks received one of three dosing regimens: 3.5, 4, or 4.5 mg/kg every 36 hours. Neonates of GA 35 weeks or older received either 3.5 or 4 mg/kg every 24 hours. Blood samples were collected 30 minutes before and 30 minutes after the third dose was infused for binary trough and peak level determinations, respectively.

RESULTS

Peak gentamicin concentrations in the target range were attained most often in neonates of GA 29 weeks or younger who received gentamicin 4.5 mg/kg every 48 hours, in neonates of GA 30-34 weeks treated with gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg every 36 hours, and in neonates of GA 35 weeks or older treated with gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg every 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

For neonates of GA 30-34 weeks, gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg every 36 hours resulted in the highest percentage of peaks in the target range compared with 4 and 4.5 mg/kg every 36 hours. For neonates of GA 35 weeks or older, gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg every 24 hours provided the highest percentage of peaks in the target range compared with 4 mg/kg every 24 hours. The differences between the percentages of trough values in the target range of 0.5-2 μg/mL were not significant among dosing subgroups within each age group.

Accuracy of Empiric Gentamicin Dosing Guidelines in Neonates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of a neonatal gentamicin nomogram to achieve therapeutic gentamicin serum concentrations without further adjustment, allowing for decreased serum drug monitoring

METHODS

Retrospective single center review of all gentamicin pharmacokinetic evaluations in patients ≤ 30 days of life from July 2005 – June 2007. Patients were evaluated for postnatal age, gestational age, weight, serum creatinine, dose/interval, serum drug peaks and troughs, results of discharge hearing test and recent use of indomethacin. Logistic regression was utilized to determine potential factors impacting overall dosing accuracy, potentially allowing for decreased therapeutic drug monitoring. Factors found to be significant were incorporated into new guidelines which were evaluated through pharmacokinetic modeling.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy rate was 84% when empiric dosing guidelines were utilized; 16% of all doses were changed due to supratherapeutic troughs and 1% were changed due to subtherapeutic peaks. Variables found to impact the necessity for dose changes incuded gestational age (p≤0.001), weight (p≤0.001), indomethacin use (p≤0.001), number of indomethacin doses used (p≤0.001 and p=0.009 for 1–3 and 4–6 doses, respectively), and SCr in patients ≥ 7 days old (p=0.028); however, only gestational age remained a significant predictor when all other factors were considered (p=0.008). The current guidelines were changed to account for increased troughs in patients ≤ 28 weeks gestation and examined through pharmacokinetic modeling. Pharmacokinetic modeling of the new guidelines predicted an overall accuracy of 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

From the data gathered regarding the accuracy in patients ≥ 35 weeks gestation, we recommend to decrease therapeutic drug monitoring within this cohort. Utilizing the results of regression analysis, the current guidelines have been adjusted to allow for increased clearance in patients ≤ 28 weeks gestation, although they still need to be prospectively evaluated.