Effect of Telavancin on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 3A probe substrate midazolam: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in healthy subjects

Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis

Background: Remimazolam is a new ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. Remimazolam has been approved for procedural sedation by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2020. However, prior trials and the participants they enrolled were limited.

Aim: In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of remimazolam during procedural sedation.

Materials and Methods: The study protocol was registered (doi: 10.37766/inplasy2020.8.0043), and six databases were searched. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for judging the certainty of evidence (CoE).

Results: A total of five randomized controlled trials with 1,248 participants were included. Compared with the use of midazolam, the utilization of remimazolam resulted in an increase in procedure success rate [odds ratio (OR) = 9.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.35–34.57], a reduction in the application of rescue medication (OR = 13.58, 95% CI: 3.46–53.28), a decrease in time to recovery [minutes, weighted mean difference (WMD) = −5.70, 95% CI: −8.68 to −2.72], and a better cognitive recovery of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (WMD = 5.22, 95% CI: 2.88–7.55). No difference was found in completion of procedure (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 0.72–3.90) with inconclusive in TSA. Despite no difference of total AEs (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.24–1.50), more detailed analysis of AEs remained inconclusive in TSA. The GRADE assessment demonstrated low to very low CoE.

Conclusion: Our analysis suggested that remimazolam may be a better choice for procedural sedation than midazolam. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted to conclusively establish its safety.

Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management

Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-intubated patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most frequent hospital-acquired infections, especially in the intensive care unit. NP has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and health care costs, especially when the implicated pathogens are multidrug-resistant ones. This narrative review aims to critically review what is new in the field of NP, specifically, diagnosis and antibiotic treatment. Regarding novel imaging modalities, the current role of lung ultrasound and low radiation computed tomography are discussed, while regarding etiological diagnosis, recent developments in rapid microbiological confirmation, such as syndromic rapid multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction panels are presented and compared with conventional cultures. Additionally, the volatile compounds/electronic nose, a promising diagnostic tool for the future is briefly presented. With respect to NP management, antibiotics approved for the indication of NP during the last decade are discussed, namely, ceftobiprole medocaril, telavancin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Telavancin Compared with the Other Glycopeptides

Telavancin was discovered by modifying the chemical structure of vancomycin and belongs to the group of lipoglycopeptides. It employs its antimicrobial potential through two distinct mechanisms of action: inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis and induction of bacterial membrane depolarization and permeabilization. In this article we review the clinically relevant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of telavancin. For comparison, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of the other glycopeptides are presented. Although, in contrast to the newer lipoglycopeptides, telavancin demonstrates a relatively short half-life and rapid total clearance, its apparent volume of distribution (V_d) is almost identical to that of dalbavancin. The accumulation of telavancin after repeated dosing is only marginal, whereas the pharmacokinetic values of the other glycopeptides show much greater differences after administration of multiple doses. Despite its high plasma-protein binding of 90% and relatively low V_d of approximately 11 L, telavancin shows near complete equilibration of the free fraction in plasma with soft tissue. The ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC₂₄) of unbound plasma concentrations to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) required to inhibit growth of 90% of organisms (MIC₉₀) of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis of telavancin are sufficiently high to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets indicative for optimal bacterial killing. Considering both the AUC₂₄/MIC ratios of telavancin and the near complete equilibration of the free fraction in plasma with soft tissue, telavancin is an appropriate antimicrobial agent to treat soft tissue infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Although the penetration of telavancin into epithelial lining fluid (ELF) requires further investigations, the AUC₂₄/MIC ratio for S. aureus indicates that bactericidal activity in the ELF could be expected.

Scaling clearance in paediatric pharmacokinetics: All models are wrong, which are useful?

Linked Articles

This article is commented on in the editorial by Holford NHG and Anderson BJ. Why standards are useful for predicting doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83: 685–7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13230

Aim

When different models for weight and age are used in paediatric pharmacokinetic studies it is difficult to compare parameters between studies or perform model‐based meta‐analyses. This study aimed to compare published models with the proposed standard model (allometric weight^0.75 and sigmoidal maturation function).

Methods

A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify published clearance (CL) reports for gentamicin and midazolam and all published models for scaling clearance in children. Each model was fitted to the CL values for gentamicin and midazolam, and the results compared with the standard model (allometric weight exponent of 0.75, along with a sigmoidal maturation function estimating the time in weeks of postmenstrual age to reach half the mature value and a shape parameter). For comparison, we also looked at allometric size models with no age effect, the influence of estimating the allometric exponent in the standard model and, for gentamicin, using a fixed allometric exponent of 0.632 as per a study on glomerular filtration rate maturation. Akaike information criteria (AIC) and visual predictive checks were used for evaluation.

Results

No model gave an improved AIC in all age groups, but one model for gentamicin and three models for midazolam gave slightly improved global AIC fits albeit using more parameters: AIC drop (number of parameters), –4.1 (5), –9.2 (4), –10.8 (5) and –10.1 (5), respectively. The 95% confidence interval of estimated CL for all top performing models overlapped.

Conclusion

No evidence to reject the standard model was found; given the benefits of standardised parameterisation, its use should therefore be recommended.

Limited sampling strategy of partial area under the concentration-time curves to estimate midazolam systemic clearance for cytochrome P450 3A phenotyping

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous (IV) midazolam is the preferred cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A probe for phenotyping, with systemic clearance (CL) estimating hepatic CYP3A activity. A limited sampling strategy was conducted to determine whether partial area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) could reliably estimate midazolam systemic CL during conditions of CYP3A baseline activity, inhibition, and induction/activation.

METHODS

Midazolam plasma concentrations during CYP3A baseline (n = 93), inhibition (n = 40), and induction/activation (n = 33) were obtained from 7 studies in healthy adults. Noncompartmental analysis determined observed CL (CL(obs)) and partial AUCs. Linear regression equations were derived from partial AUCs to estimate CL (CL(pred)) during CYP3A baseline, inhibition, and induction/activation. Preestablished criterion for linear regression analysis was r(2) ≥ 0.9. CL(pred) was compared with CL(obs), and relative bias and precision were assessed using percent mean prediction error and percent mean absolute error.

RESULTS

During CYP3A baseline and inhibition, all evaluated partial AUCs failed to meet criterion of r(2) ≥ 0.9 and/or percent mean absolute error <15%. During CYP3A induction/activation, equations derived from partial AUCs from 0 to 1 hour (AUC0-1), 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2), and 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4) were acceptable, with good precision and minimal bias. These equations provided the same conclusions regarding equivalency testing compared with intense sampling.

CONCLUSIONS

During CYP3A induction/activation, but not baseline or inhibition, midazolam partial AUC0-1, AUC0-2, and AUC0-4 reliably estimated systemic CL and consequently hepatic CYP3A activity in healthy adults.

Telavancin (VIBATIV) for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has emerged as a major causative pathogen in complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs). Unfortunately, treatment failure with vancomycin has been increasingly reported. Over the past decade, several alternative antimicrobial agents have been studied and approved for the treatment of cSSSIs. One such agent is the lipoglycopeptide telavancin, which was approved by the US FDA 2009. Given its dual mechanism of action, telavancin is characterized by a highly bactericidal activity and low potential for resistance selection. In addition, in clinical trials, it was efficacious and safe in the treatment of cSSSI. The purpose of this review is to give a background overview of telavancin, highlighting its microbiological, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics characteristics, to summarize the available evidence for its use in the treatment of cSSSIs, and to provide an updated evaluation of its safety profile.

Telavancin: a review of its use in patients with nosocomial pneumonia

Telavancin (Vibativ(®)), a lipoglycopeptide antibacterial agent, exhibits potent in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria associated with nosocomial pneumonia infections, including meticillin/oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates and S. aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. In two multinational trials in adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including infections caused by MRSA isolates, a 1-h intravenous infusion of telavancin 10 mg/kg once daily was noninferior to intravenous vancomycin 1 g every 12 h in terms of clinical cure rates in the all-treated (AT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at the follow-up/test-of-cure (FU/TOC) visit. At this visit, clinical cure rates in the AT populations of both groups were approximately 60 %, with rates increasing to ≥80 % in the CE population. Pooled analyses of these trials also generally showed no significant between-group differences in clinical cure rates at the FU/TOC visit in the AT, CE and microbiologically evaluable (ME) populations. In the ME population, clinical cure rates were generally similar in the telavancin and vancomycin groups, irrespective of whether infections were mono- or polymicrobial, or caused by MRSA or methicillin/oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates. Telavancin was generally well tolerated in patients with nosocomial pneumonia participating in clinical trials, with a tolerability profile that was generally similar to that of vancomycin. Telavancin offers an alternative treatment option in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-positive S. aureus, including those caused by MRSA and S. aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

Telavancin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that is structurally related to vancomycin. It demonstrates in vitro activity against a variety of Gram-positive pathogens including, but not limited to, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Telavancin is currently FDA-approved for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of telavancin compared to vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Overall, telavancin has a favorable safety profile. However, mild gastrointestinal disturbances and reversible increases in serum creatinine were observed in clinical studies. Additional clinical studies are needed to evaluate telavancin's efficacy and safety in comparison to other antistaphylococcal agents for the treatment of infections such as bacteremia and endocarditis.

Population pharmacokinetics of telavancin in healthy subjects and patients with infections

A population pharmacokinetic model of telavancin, a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, was developed and used to identify sources of interindividual variability. Data were obtained from healthy subjects (seven phase 1 studies), patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI; two phase 2 and two phase 3 studies), and patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP; two phase 3 studies). A two-compartment open model with zero-order input best fit the telavancin data from healthy individuals and patients with cSSSI or HAP. Telavancin clearance was highly correlated with renal function and, to a lesser extent, with body weight. Other covariates were related to at least one parameter in cSSSI (gender, bacterial eradication, and surgery) or HAP (age of ≥ 75 years) but did not markedly affect exposure. These analyses support current dosing recommendations for telavancin based on patient weight and renal function.

Telavancin: a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria in adults

BACKGROUND

Telavancin, a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, is a semisynthetic derivative of vancomycin. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes the pharmacology, in vitro and in vivo activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical efficacy and tolerability of telavancin.

METHODS

Relevant information was identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-August 2010), Iowa Drug Information Service (1966-August 2010), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-August 2010), and Google Scholar using the terms telavancin, lipoglycopeptide, and TD-6424. Abstracts and posters from scientific meetings, as well as documents submitted by the manufacturer of telavancin to the FDA as part of the approval process, were consulted. In vivo and in vitro experimental and clinical studies and review articles that provided information on the activity, mechanism of action, pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of telavancin were reviewed.

RESULTS

In vitro, telavancin has potent activity against S aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains; Streptococcus pneumoniae; and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci with MICs generally <1 μg/mL. Telavancin appears to have a dual mechanism of action, inhibiting cell wall formation and disrupting the cell membrane. In Phase III studies (ATLAS 1 and ATLAS 2), telavancin was found to be noninferior to vancomycin, with clinical cure rates of 88.3% and 87.1%, respectively, in clinically evaluable patients in the treatment of cSSSIs (difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -2.1 to 4.6; P = NS). The effectiveness of telavancin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia was assessed in 2 Phase III studies (ATTAIN 1 and ATTAIN 2). Preliminary findings were that the effectiveness of telavancin was not significantly different from that of vancomycin, with cure rates of 82.7% and 80.9% in the clinically evaluable population, respectively (difference, 1.8%; 95% CI, -4.1 to 7.7; P = NS). The most commonly (>10%) reported adverse events included taste disturbances, nausea, headache, vomiting, foamy urine, constipation, and insomnia.

CONCLUSION

In clinical trials, the effectiveness of telavancin was not significantly different from that of vancomycin in the treatment of cSSSIs, and telavancin was generally well tolerated.

Role of telavancin in treatment of skin and skin structure infections

Skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) are a common diagnosis encountered by ambulatory and inpatient practitioners across the country. As the SSSIs become more complicated, they require increased health care resources and often involve hospitalization and intravenous antimicrobials. Complicated SSSIs are caused by a variety of pathogens, including Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anerobic bacteria. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage is warranted, taking into account area disease-state epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility data. Telavancin is an antimicrobial agent with a broad Gram-positive spectrum of activity which was recently approved for the treatment of SSSIs. It may especially benefit patients with resistant organisms, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This article reviews telavancin and its pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data to enhance the practitioner’s knowledge base on the appropriateness of telavancin for the treatment of SSSIs.